I personally know Dr. Matt Johnson. HE's a clinical psychologist in Grants Pass, Oregon. Really nice guy and he saw it sasquatch at the oregon caves. He's for real, he still goes on expeditions to look for sasquatch.
"The Father of Big Foot"? Please this family should have read some American History before they made these claims. If they did they would have realized that The Legend of Big Foot has been apart of this countries history even before British settlers landed here.
No dermal impressions were visible on ANY of Wallace's fakes. This would be extremely difficult to accomplish this with wooden carvings. Refer to Jimmy Chilcutt and the late Professor Grover Kranz for expert analysis of photographs and casts.
No evidence of flexion in any of prints left by the Wallace carvings. Wooden carvings do not 'flex' as a bipedal foot is designed to do. There are several places where a foot would show signs of flexion. Wallace's fakes were all flat and hard.
That's right, Wallace did make fake bigfoot 'stompers' and tracks, and he never claimed those tracks to be real. The real ones that he found were very different from tracks made by his 'stompers', which had no dermal ridges.
This has been flagged as spam show
Didn't Ray Wallace make some hoax Bigfoot movies as well? I can't find any on the net.
texashoncho 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I personally know Dr. Matt Johnson. HE's a clinical psychologist in Grants Pass, Oregon. Really nice guy and he saw it sasquatch at the oregon caves. He's for real, he still goes on expeditions to look for sasquatch.
rockabillebastard 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
humans dont know everything there are animal species we doint know about yet
magicaltails 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The fact that some prints are faked have nothing to do with the fact that others can only be understood to be real.
sonofawindowdresser 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The Father of Big Foot"? Please this family should have read some American History before they made these claims. If they did they would have realized that The Legend of Big Foot has been apart of this countries history even before British settlers landed here.
TheBean 5 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
North Americans of European descent are notorious for forgetting about the Native Americans. Kinda discusting really.
sonofawindowdresser 4 years ago
No dermal impressions were visible on ANY of Wallace's fakes. This would be extremely difficult to accomplish this with wooden carvings. Refer to Jimmy Chilcutt and the late Professor Grover Kranz for expert analysis of photographs and casts.
No evidence of flexion in any of prints left by the Wallace carvings. Wooden carvings do not 'flex' as a bipedal foot is designed to do. There are several places where a foot would show signs of flexion. Wallace's fakes were all flat and hard.
MickPsyphon 5 years ago
That's right, Wallace did make fake bigfoot 'stompers' and tracks, and he never claimed those tracks to be real. The real ones that he found were very different from tracks made by his 'stompers', which had no dermal ridges.
PostToastie 4 years ago
Very intersing...Wallace was familiar with real tracks though...check the double ball on the foot...an extra point of mid tarsal flexion...hmmm.
joeyvader 5 years ago
Very important piece you have created and posted here. Thanks for adding this to the growing repository of Bigfoot facts on YouTube.
Labyrinth13 5 years ago