Added: 5 years ago
From: PostToastie
Views: 11,176
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No dermal impressions were visible on ANY of Wallace's fakes. This would be extremely difficult to accomplish this with wooden carvings. Refer to Jimmy Chilcutt and the late Professor Grover Kranz for expert analysis of photographs and casts.

    No evidence of flexion in any of prints left by the Wallace carvings. Wooden carvings do not 'flex' as a bipedal foot is designed to do. There are several places where a foot would show signs of flexion. Wallace's fakes were all flat and hard.

  • That's right, Wallace did make fake bigfoot 'stompers' and tracks, and he never claimed those tracks to be real. The real ones that he found were very different from tracks made by his 'stompers', which had no dermal ridges.

  • Very intersing...Wallace was familiar with real tracks though...check the double ball on the foot...an extra point of mid tarsal flexion...hmmm.

  • Very important piece you have created and posted here. Thanks for adding this to the growing repository of Bigfoot facts on YouTube.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more