Even MICHAEL JACKSON said that the same people that are MANIPULATING the news WRITE THE HISTORY books. The ILLUMINATI is all beihnd it! Search the internet and read the bible - make connections. The lies are EVERYWHERE. You cannot believe it's possible when you find out.
By the way, if anyone sees this comment and would like to see at least some evidence in support of evolution, and if for some reason they do not know how to find it, can look up videos titled "the case for evolution" with niles Eldridge. Also, try some videos by people such as potholer54 and others in the suggestions list of videos beside potholer54's videos on evolution. I found them quite adequit. As a disclaimer, the narrators may be a bit rude, but the facts are well explained.
@ItsEasyIfYouThink All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
Lol... I have to say... I just watched the first... 2 and a half minutes of this video, and i had to laugh at how this guy tried to claim that "technology, with the exception of the past 200 years, was more advanced as time goes back." hahahahaha ok... what if i just said... the scientific method? uhm... how about... metal working... inventions like the telescope... lol pretty much everthing around the enlightenment, before which progression was slower, but still evident and very effective!
This cannot be true...because it if were the current prevailing mythology of life would be false. Since none of the high-priests from this contemporary myth (evolution) are willing to admit the overwhelming paucity of evidence, the flat out dishonesties, and errors, it will be many years before the human race can intellectually advance.
Ica stones have been found to be hoaxes and are well known for being such. It would not matter anyhow as these stones cannot even be categorized as evidence. Petroglyphs cannot be dated. Show me a human skeleton in the same lithography as a dinosaur and we can call that evidence. As of yet that has not happened. I suggest "evidence" in the title should be deleted as it is not evidence. Also I lived in Bolivia and it is the Aymara Indians (i worked with them) not the Amante Indians.
@coolvideo28 What creation science? Do creationists have any degree in Biology? The answer is no. They have a Bible in which they get al there answers from. I've had thousands of religious arguments in which creationists are backed up in a corner and say "God made it that way". That is not a valid point. You have no evidence to back up your theory. You do NO research to fill the giant holes in the Creationist theory.
@WhiteRoarBlack All real Science is Creation Science. Science is nothing more then the study of Gods Creation. U can either believe What Your Creator says about his Creation or believe in some men who made up a Fairytale (evolution)& have lots of followers even though there is not One piece of evidence suporting it. the Fossil record Proves Creation there isnt One transitional fossil. If you want to learn some real Science go watch my favorited vdeos on my channel. You wont because your scared.
@coolvideo28 "God"? You cannot observe God. There is no evidence for God. You cannot find an answer to the universe so conjure up an answer like your "God". Do you really think that Cain got a wife as a reward from "God" by killing his brother Abel? The first 4 commandments are about God enforcing his rules out of pure selfishness. I myself have overcome being selfish, so why can't God? I don't have an answer, so I use observation to look for one. Not by a book that was written by lunatics.
@WhiteRoarBlack Everything is evidence of God a Creator even U. If I showed U a baried car that was rusted up & dated it from the rock it was next to saying this obviously evolved U w/ B laughing on the ground rolling around yet U let some brainwashed people who call them selfs scientists tell U that everything evolved it would be so funny if it wasnt so sad. better said "Ye] blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel." Matthew 23:24
@coolvideo28 there are transitional fossils, you are ignoring them, and then expect scientists to knock on your door carrying transitional fossils, which you will again ignore because you are incapable of accepting evidence that doesn't support your worldview.
@ballsy101 HAHAHAAA I expect Scientists to come to my door HAHAAA Nope I just want to see some evidence they cant find 1 piece of evidence suporting evol.
Don't deny what's there. You're not seeing what's in front of your eyes because they're obscured by the cataracts of ignorance. You would understand if you weren't such an assblassted trashfool. Go eat some waffles and suck a key.
@ballsy101 You have nothing to bring to the table so you bring insults and name calling go grow up eventualy you will hopefuly mature enough to admit the truth that you believe in God and then go read & study the Bible. Then you will learn the truth. Jesus is your only hope.
@coolvideo28 I apologize, that was my friend and not me. To make up for it, let me try a different angle, is there any way I can show you evidence of transitional fossils? Pictures? Articles? Websites with a ".edu" at the end? If I show you these, will you accept the fact that there are transitional fossils? Or will you not?
@ballsy101 I am the type of person who likes to see the truth. I dont care if it comes from a 6 year old who dug it up in his back yard or a Scientist. I know Scientists that got there degree and are ignorant to most of Science and I know people who have studied Science there whole life because they love it and know more then Scientists with all kinds of degrees. I wil tell you what go check out the videos on my channel w/ an open mind & I will look at the evidence you bring me.Have a great day.
@gregrutz I have debated you sooo many times and proved evol. a complete Fraud over and over you no evol. is a lie so why are you still trying to pretend you believe in it and lying about evidence. Please dont answere me. I will continue praying for you bye.
@gregrutz Ya and the quran is taught in every school/university in all muslum nations does that make that crazyness true. As usual No logic. Then why do you keep commenting to me again please dont answere bye
@gregrutz Nope the quran just copied a small part of the Bible and wrote nonsense the truth always gets copied the Bible is Gods living word if you dont know it then you dont know the truth. Nothing could be more ignorant then ignoring what are Creator says about his Creation.
@coolvideo28 The bible is not gods living word. Like all other books it was written by men. Specifically at the council of nicea when christianity was still a cult practiced by many groups who all had their own ideas of what it should be/was. The bible was created to unify those groups and is a combination of their ideas/beliefs. Sorry but thats just plain ol history.
@Cinthorc Wow almost everything you said was wrong. Gods living word was inspired by God writen by men.The word was writen way before the council of nicea they just compiled the Books into one book the Bible. Christianity started in the begining when adam spoke and had a relationship with God it just wasnt called Christianity yet because Jesus CHRIST hadnt come to earth yet to live and die and rise again for You me and everyone. You need to get some real history try reading the Bible.
@coolvideo28 So your historical reference to back up your claims regarding the bible is a story from within the bible? ...have you read many other books? have you read any ancient mythology? the bible draws parallels to old world religions intentionally to have made the transition from polytheism to monotheism easier on pagan cultures. Tell me, do you believe any American or European history? I know its not outlined in the bible or anything but trust me, its legit.
@GladosHal3000 You just dont know the truth, until you study the Bible and pray to Jesus God for wisdom and understanding you will never know the truth.
@GladosHal3000 I just use common sense and believe What God says about the Creation he Created, there could be nothing more ignorant then ignoring your Creator he knows everything.
@GladosHal3000 Just some weeks ago some scientists found a galaxy far away that is supposed to be much older than the big bang is supposed to be.. does that mean that big bang theory is fail now?
@greken145 When/what are you talking about? In January we discovered the oldest galaxy to date which suggests galaxies are able to form faster than we may have first thought (about 500 million years after big bang) and thats about it. Even if you did mention something pre-dating big bang or something older than would have originally been thought possible it means only that things are even older than 6000 years. Thats whats wonderful about science, its always correcting itself, unlike scripture.
@GladosHal3000 Yea, at the same time it means that science can be wrong. There are many unanswered questions about big bang. And about scripture..the problem with atheists is that they tend to see Bible from a physic point of view which is completely wrong. The mening with genesis isnt to explain us scientifically in every detail how the earth or univerese was created. Its mening is to show us that there is a God who loves us and wants us to save ourselves by following his rules.
@greken145 Yes, science can be wrong. Atheists generally don't have a problem with what you just described from the bible points of contention arise when followers take it literally and then create videos like this one.
@greken145 People have died in the past because they went against the teachings of the bible. The bible was written to be taken literally. Henry Morris father of modern creation science said and I quote "Thus it is obvious that one can reject the historicity of Genesis I only if he likewise rejects the rest of the bible as well. The only bible-honoring truth is, of course, that Genesis I-II is actual historical truth". I'm an atheist, but I wish more theists shared your views, but they don't.
@mmawilldesha What do u mean by the "Bible was written to be taken litterally?" Cause the Bible i know is full of for ex. symbolisms. And are u talking old or new testament? I honestly dont know who that guy is and i dont wait for others to tell me how i will believe in something. I can discuss different ways of viewing things though.
@greken145 Well, if you're a creationist then you should know who Henry Morris. He is the reason for videos like this. I might've jumped the gun, because I assumed you were a creationist theist. What I mean by written to be taken literally is that the people who wrote the bible weren't messing around when they wrote it. Had you been born in the times of Giordano Bruno and said that you didn't see the bible from a physical point of view you would've been either killed, or put in prison.
@greken145 Again I'm an atheist now, but before I was a christian for 17 yrs. I was taught growing up was that everything in the bible is true end of story and to never question it, if you do you go to hell. That's why I see it from a physical point of view, that's what I was taught, and that's way most atheists see the bible that way. It's good to know that some christians take the bible literally word for word as things that have actually happened but that was not the intentions of the writers
@mmawilldesha Well, then u were taught the wrong way. Jesus said clearly: "u want to have an eternal life, follow me", He never said anything about punishing those who go against, He even forgave those who killed Him. Bible isnt an easy book to understand, some words might have ment something completely different before in time and some verses might be symbolisms or metaphors.
I have read it completely twice. Both the Old and New Testaments. However I didn't stop with the Jew propaganda. I read as many ancient historical texts as I can dig up. I find the Bible, like I said before, a weak translation of the Sumerian Tablets (among others). The Bible is not the word of God. It is the censored words of Lord Enki written 12,000 years ago. The Old Testament is a history of the JEW, not of the gentile and written to hide the fact the Jew is not the follower of Creator
The Bible is a plagiarized re-write of the Sumerian Tablets which date thousands of years before the Bible was written. At best the Bible is 10% correct in it's account of creation and the rest is nothing more than the history of the Jews written by the Jews. Also if you do your real homework you will find that the God of the Jews is Lord Enki, not the prime creator of all things. Sadly Christians believe in the same Annunaki/Sumerian God as the Jews.There are better references than the Bible.
For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. Hebrews 4:12
And the Conquistadores gave to the Head of the Children of the light of the Sun,
a Bible, then he threw it to the ground, he didn't like weapons they had, he saw
the hypocrisy. By doing this he took away the religious mask off their faces.
This children of the devil when they felt discovered, massacred hundreds of the Children of the light of the Sun that had come out to greet them in peace.
So some civilizations from a few thousand years ago made intricate drawings in the earth, mapped the movements of the moon to make reliable calenders. They supposedly made "working flying machines", could supposedly preform brain surgery, and had porno. How is this a "more advanced" civilization? Even if all of this was true (which I doubt the last two claims very much); today we have been in space, we have computers, hell we have working lights (evidence says they didn't even have these).
Scientific questions are settled in court? Great. Just have federal judges figure it all out, make their rulings and all the scientists who write "wrong" opinions will be jailed and fined. That fixes all the nasty bickering nicely.
haha i stopped watching after this guy said "demonstrate amazing technology... and the co-existence of humans and dinosaurs."
Believe what you want, but for the love of God (yes, your God), don't be proud of it in view of the public. You'll only "demonstrate" how ignorant creationists really are.
@sbkang85 Creationists are very interested in real science, not science fiction.
All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
@sbkang85 Please show us our ignorance in a public SCIENCE forum.
All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
@BereanBeacon1 Instead of continually challenging the people that understand biology to a contest held in a forum specifically not designed for science, why not challenge the creationists to take their evidences into the actual scientific arena?
Do you think creationists are too scared to try real science in the forum where real science is done? Because what you're doing now is comparable to issuing a biker build-off challenge and holding it in an emergency room.
@BereanBeacon1 We've already shown creationists to be utterly ignorant of anything resembling science in the actual scientific arena, the life science prize challenge is not in a scientific forum.
This video is not scientific and everyone should know it isn't. First of all, this was an isolated case of human fossils and dinosaur fossils placed together. Most likely there was an earthquake or upheaval that brought older rocks up several layers. Second, myths generally contain large, fantastic versions of modern animals. Last, if this a-hole wants to mess with public school, I'd like to see him present a case to the supreme court.
@BereanBeacon1 Oh, poor little Creationist. Still letting the big bad public school system bother you? Well, the truth hurts. If you want to listen to what unqualified people and an over 2000 year old book are saying, then be my guest. Consider yourself the best damn thing God ever created, cause you know what? It's not going to matter in the next few decades when you creationists are all but extinct internationally and a minority in the US.
Patton and his ilk spam the Internet with this kind of drivel and it is deplorable. It should be immediately evident to anyone who listens closely that Patton cannot even keep his own lies straight within a given presentation.
Patton's academic credentials are a hoax and he knows it, but he has no qualms about making a living exploiting the weak of mind and propagating these lies.
If he was merely deluded, one might excuse him, but there is a deliberate effort to deceive occurring here.
@obsops All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK.
@BereanBeacon1 A repost for you: That "Life Science Prize"? It is a joke. Number 5 ("Evidence must be scientific, that is, objective, valid, reliable and calibrated") on the list is a problem for creationists. Look up the Dover Trial. The evidence and lack-thereof has already been settled in court.
Any valid scientific study would pass peer review. Creationists have NO science to back them up and don't follow the scientific peer review process. YOU are the chicken.
@BereanBeacon1 10,000 is chump change compared to how many nobel prizes scientists have won. You can't evolve from a chicken. The mammal split from the reptile chain before the dinosaurs existed but remained small like mice until the dinosaurs died. The birds split after the dinosaurs became extinct. Your remarks show you are ignorant, close-minded, rude, and generally unpleasant individual. You're grammar may be better than that of your fellow Creationists but you are still over your head.
Don Patton has no degrees or scientific background and is academically dishonest by claiming a Ph.D. The "Ph.D". is from an unaccredited diploma mill run by his close friend Carl Baugh. Lying for Jesus has no bounds especially when you need money to run your "ministry".
@BereanBeacon1 Early in his academic career he did. His recent (past 20 years) has been dedicated to writing books to offend Christians. He is an arrogant jerk. He does however hold numerous degrees from real universities.
Patton has no background other than in theology (no real degrees there also) and utters complete and utter pseudo-scientific nonsense to offend educated Christians and keep the ignorant and intellectually challenged dumbed down.
@Forallilovebook See the big box next to the word SEARCH ? Type in the words proof of evolution and hit ENTER. There is enough evidence here on youtube. See cdk007, DonExodus, AronRa videos.
@Forallilovebook Answers in what? You don't start with the answers and look for evidence that fits. You look and the evidence and see what it predicts.
@Forallilovebook carbon/radiometric dating is, idiot. in fact i'm willing to bet you have no idea what either of those dating methods are or how they prove the earth is 6.54 billion years old.
@myco578 Carbon dating is getting a rock and doing a bunch of tests on it. It's very accurate to up to 50,000 years. And since your an illeterate, you must know Carbon Dating is a form of Radiometric Dating. Neither of those prove the world is 6.54 Billion years old, and no one has ever proven it. *facepalm*
@Forallilovebook i said carbon dating "/" radiometric dating. okay fine, how about Rubidium-strontium dating, which has a half life up to 50 billion years. there's more than just carbon dating, there's 17 well known methods for measuring the actual age of the earth, not just making shit up like the bible. and its 4.54 billion i made a typo.
What?, Where is the evidence that Nazca Villagers used hot air balloons?. Sophisticated math to figure it out that is not an astronaut?, LOL. The Nazca Villagers had gold?, LOL. FALSE. The images in Nazca were created to point at were the water was located at and the Astronaut is just a man who was drawn during the 1600 AD. Dinosaurs in Nazca? LOL. Caral which is way older civilization than Nazca and just a few miles away never showed any dinosaurs draws. BS BS BS BS.... Ignorant old men.
when i was child I found small stones with nazca lines graved on them,,,the monkey and the bird figures,,,,unfortunatley they built the a patio of the schools there we didnt say nothing ,,we were to small to know this stones were important,,,to Peru,,,This place was located in South Lima
@12bamish Mess with the bull, you get the horns, not eaten.
Most bears are omnivores, like us meaning, they eat what is available and/or convienient.
There is a tribe of Native Americans that had "dragon" myths based on pterosaur fossils found in the area, they didn't know they where old, the "giant sky monsters" could still be around as far as they could tell.
@mockerofscoffers ''we will never change each other will we brother''
Correct, no matter how much proof for evolution there is, you will never accept it. There is nothing I can do to educate you. Nothing I can show you to change your mind.
@mockerofscoffers If I gave you the component parts of a colour TV could you construct a working TV from them? If the answer is "no" then using your "logic" colour TV's are designed and constructed by "god".
@lewisner Mmyeah.. As this vid shows, people were smarter the further we go back. The pyramids themselves are a testimony to that fact. The oldest one is the best preserved one. By far. That means the earliest builders were better at it then the later ones. That's a pattern you see all over the world. If one would bother to look. Evolution is a fairytale. Grow up.
@lewisner Nope, they didn't have computers and such. And yet, here they are! And we, with our computers are unable to copy most of it. And still you don´t see. Yes, they had good achitects! And engineers, doctors, blacksmiths (metallurgy), etc. They found batteries, The evidence is all around you, staring you in the face. So the Inca´s had slaves? You know of the average life expactancy of the people from 2000 to 3000 BC? Tell me your sources.
@lewisner Yeah, I understand the transition from non-thinking to thinking can hurt.. And indeed, my humour knows no boundaries! I see you failed to produce the sources for your fantastic claims?
@lewisner So then tell me......just how did those dinosaurs end up on those stones? I would like to hear what you would consider the most logical explanation.
@carp1844 Go to Wikipedia and search for Ica Stones. There were genuine stones found in the 16th century but these did not depict dinosaurs. In 1966 Cabrera (not Cabera - the maker of this video didn't even spell his name right!) was sold the "dinosaur" stones by a farmer Basilio Uschuya who later told police he had carved them himself.
On Wikipedia please read carefully the section "Exposure As A Hoax".
@carp1844 Here are two ideas for that. If it were true that dinosaurs co-existed with Nazca Villagers. Then they would had existed with the Chimu, Caral and perhaps even later on with the Incas.
Nazca is about the same time as Chimu. Caral is way older than Nazca, none of this other empires has any sort of draws about dinosaurs. Is it possible that Nazca villagers found dinosaurs fossils and study them?, or is more possible those stones are purely fake.
@Caleta280 I appreciate your logical approach to this and you make some good points. I feel it would be honest to inform you that I do have a biased opinion. Through extensive research of other civilizations mentioning or depicting dinos coupled with my understanding of Bible prophecy and the holes in evolution I am thoroughly convinced of the Genesis creation. These stones fit into my world view therefor in my opinion deserve a bit more of a chance at the table before being quickly dismissed.
@gregrutz You will notice in my comment that I simply said "they fit into my world view". I did not ,however, say that I firmly believe they are genuine. I simply said that I think they deserve a chance at the table before being quickly dismissed. In other words people should not jump to conclusions until ALL of the facts are in. If nothing else my statement shows that I am honest enough to not take an affirmative stance one way or the other on these stones. I would welcome such honesty from you
@carp1844 "people should not jump to conclusions until ALL of the facts are in". The facts are that no fossils of the dinosaurs depicted have been found here, in fact those dinosaurs were mostly confined to Arizona. The original stones were discovered in the 1600's and none of them depict dinosaurs. These stones were "discovered" by a farmer in the 1960's and under examination by police he admitted he had carved them based on Dinosaur books. If they were genuine they'd have been claimed by Peru.
@lewisner Are you of the opinion that people are getting smarter? Advances in technology do not represent the average person. Advances in technology are built upon the discoveries of previous generations therefor you cannot compare using technology. My parent's generation could name all US states and every president by the 3rd grade. A third grader that can do that now would be a rare exception. This is only one of many examples. Your logic is flawed.
I was promisuous in my youth, I was rebellious, I sold drugs, I mocked the Bible (tho I never read it), I openly mocked God and made fun of Christians.
But God, who is rich in mercy, forgave me; my past present and future! When I repented of my sin and accepted Yeshua (Jesus) as The Promised One, The Messiah, The Christ! Praise God! I'm forgiven!
amen for your testimony!.. i too led the same life style, i called it "the foolish years" lol... but im happy you found Jesus, and he is a trillion times more happy, you can believe that!..
also, whoever it was that said the Bible speaks of the world as flat and the center of the universe is obvs too ignorant for you to spend your time talking to.. the Bible actually speaks of the earth as being a sphere, which back then was no fact!
@mockerofscoffers This isn't evidence - it's just silly nonsense. Can't you tell the difference? You should read more and you wouldn't accept nonsense as fact.
@masala505 ...you would have no idea how much i read or know....evidence is not proof of anything..it is just that...EVIDENCE.........Like the evidence you have presented to me... about "MOST ATHEISTS generalising" on what they think they know.
You are the proof in the pudding to my initial post...........I rest my case.
@mockerofscoffers There is a mountain of evidence proving evolution, there is also a lot of evidence showing there was never a global flood. What is the name of the mud layer with all the fossils in it?
And search proof of evolution There is enough right here on YouTube.
@gregrutz .....you mean the strata..yeah why do they find trees through all different levels of the strata that are meant to be millions of years in difference?
Same tree through the various levels..what happens when you get a jar of mud rocks and sand and stir it up....when it settles it does so in layers..sounds like flood evidence. Macro evolution is a farce why don't you Youtube ppsimmons and look at the fairytale that seculars science has concocted since the days of Darwin.
This fuck face twists the facts aquaducts are not astonishing at least not by todays standards at most they are crude
warrenjohnathan29 1 week ago
What a fraud.Imagine con-men like this teaching children.
stratocaster539 3 weeks ago
@stratocaster539 Sad for you that the artifacts are real.
AbandonedPanda 1 week ago
really informative and interesting
xtremetom180 1 month ago
interesting video and very informative
thegeffc 1 month ago
ya figures you would say it was fake or someone made just like your evolutionary crap that is all mainly made up or drawn get a life
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
theknox idiot is not qualified to debunk anything
thoostorm4 3 months ago
It amazing how ignorant religious fanatics can find so much room on the web.
windysalasso 3 months ago
Even MICHAEL JACKSON said that the same people that are MANIPULATING the news WRITE THE HISTORY books. The ILLUMINATI is all beihnd it! Search the internet and read the bible - make connections. The lies are EVERYWHERE. You cannot believe it's possible when you find out.
Andicous 4 months ago
How is that evidence?
"I had evidence but then someone destroyed it...BELIEVE ME YET?"
josephpatrickknox 5 months ago
@josephpatrickknox Destroyed? He didn't say these were destroyed. Go to the museums.
Andicous 4 months ago
that dinosaur pottery is either fake or made by people today
multisnootylives1 5 months ago
@multisnootylives1 fool, open ur eyes.
Andicous 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@multisnootylives1 how the fuck would a mentally ill u tuber know???????????
thoostorm4 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@multisnootylives1 if nutzu recruited you why would you risk things for a cartoonboy?????you willbe reported
thoostorm4 3 months ago
Noah's ark was dinosaur.
uniontera 7 months ago
"human skull?" Really, can we have the picture with more details than just a lanscape picture with a hypothetcal face in the ground...
Oh wait there is a face on Mars as well !!!
MattleSystem 8 months ago
Oh man, i almost forgot. Also check out "Ken Miller on Human Evoution." very convincing stuff there.
ItsEasyIfYouThink 9 months ago
By the way, if anyone sees this comment and would like to see at least some evidence in support of evolution, and if for some reason they do not know how to find it, can look up videos titled "the case for evolution" with niles Eldridge. Also, try some videos by people such as potholer54 and others in the suggestions list of videos beside potholer54's videos on evolution. I found them quite adequit. As a disclaimer, the narrators may be a bit rude, but the facts are well explained.
ItsEasyIfYouThink 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ItsEasyIfYouThink All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
BereanBeacon1 9 months ago
Lol... I have to say... I just watched the first... 2 and a half minutes of this video, and i had to laugh at how this guy tried to claim that "technology, with the exception of the past 200 years, was more advanced as time goes back." hahahahaha ok... what if i just said... the scientific method? uhm... how about... metal working... inventions like the telescope... lol pretty much everthing around the enlightenment, before which progression was slower, but still evident and very effective!
ItsEasyIfYouThink 9 months ago
This cannot be true...because it if were the current prevailing mythology of life would be false. Since none of the high-priests from this contemporary myth (evolution) are willing to admit the overwhelming paucity of evidence, the flat out dishonesties, and errors, it will be many years before the human race can intellectually advance.
thinkingman07 9 months ago
Amazing documental, thanks a lot!
xchris1800 10 months ago
Ica stones have been found to be hoaxes and are well known for being such. It would not matter anyhow as these stones cannot even be categorized as evidence. Petroglyphs cannot be dated. Show me a human skeleton in the same lithography as a dinosaur and we can call that evidence. As of yet that has not happened. I suggest "evidence" in the title should be deleted as it is not evidence. Also I lived in Bolivia and it is the Aymara Indians (i worked with them) not the Amante Indians.
cmsalvagio 11 months ago
I love watching Real Science (Creation Science) when there is so much evolution fairytale around trying to brainwash us and are kids with these lies.
coolvideo28 11 months ago
@coolvideo28 What creation science? Do creationists have any degree in Biology? The answer is no. They have a Bible in which they get al there answers from. I've had thousands of religious arguments in which creationists are backed up in a corner and say "God made it that way". That is not a valid point. You have no evidence to back up your theory. You do NO research to fill the giant holes in the Creationist theory.
WhiteRoarBlack 11 months ago
@WhiteRoarBlack All real Science is Creation Science. Science is nothing more then the study of Gods Creation. U can either believe What Your Creator says about his Creation or believe in some men who made up a Fairytale (evolution)& have lots of followers even though there is not One piece of evidence suporting it. the Fossil record Proves Creation there isnt One transitional fossil. If you want to learn some real Science go watch my favorited vdeos on my channel. You wont because your scared.
coolvideo28 11 months ago
@coolvideo28 "God"? You cannot observe God. There is no evidence for God. You cannot find an answer to the universe so conjure up an answer like your "God". Do you really think that Cain got a wife as a reward from "God" by killing his brother Abel? The first 4 commandments are about God enforcing his rules out of pure selfishness. I myself have overcome being selfish, so why can't God? I don't have an answer, so I use observation to look for one. Not by a book that was written by lunatics.
WhiteRoarBlack 11 months ago
@WhiteRoarBlack Everything is evidence of God a Creator even U. If I showed U a baried car that was rusted up & dated it from the rock it was next to saying this obviously evolved U w/ B laughing on the ground rolling around yet U let some brainwashed people who call them selfs scientists tell U that everything evolved it would be so funny if it wasnt so sad. better said "Ye] blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel." Matthew 23:24
look around everything was obviously created.
coolvideo28 11 months ago
@coolvideo28 "trees and clouds look nice, therefore MY god did it" is not a argument for creation, it's an argument for ignorance and stupidity.
ballsy101 9 months ago
@WhiteRoarBlack Haha yes your right , obviously God aint made out of the propertys that mortals like us are made out of thats why he is God.
julioloaiza100 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@julioloaiza100 ther is no invisible man in the sky phukhead
thoostorm4 10 months ago
@coolvideo28 there are transitional fossils, you are ignoring them, and then expect scientists to knock on your door carrying transitional fossils, which you will again ignore because you are incapable of accepting evidence that doesn't support your worldview.
ballsy101 9 months ago
@ballsy101 HAHAHAAA I expect Scientists to come to my door HAHAAA Nope I just want to see some evidence they cant find 1 piece of evidence suporting evol.
coolvideo28 9 months ago
@coolvideo28
Don't deny what's there. You're not seeing what's in front of your eyes because they're obscured by the cataracts of ignorance. You would understand if you weren't such an assblassted trashfool. Go eat some waffles and suck a key.
ballsy101 9 months ago
@ballsy101 You have nothing to bring to the table so you bring insults and name calling go grow up eventualy you will hopefuly mature enough to admit the truth that you believe in God and then go read & study the Bible. Then you will learn the truth. Jesus is your only hope.
coolvideo28 9 months ago
@coolvideo28 I apologize, that was my friend and not me. To make up for it, let me try a different angle, is there any way I can show you evidence of transitional fossils? Pictures? Articles? Websites with a ".edu" at the end? If I show you these, will you accept the fact that there are transitional fossils? Or will you not?
ballsy101 9 months ago
@ballsy101 I am the type of person who likes to see the truth. I dont care if it comes from a 6 year old who dug it up in his back yard or a Scientist. I know Scientists that got there degree and are ignorant to most of Science and I know people who have studied Science there whole life because they love it and know more then Scientists with all kinds of degrees. I wil tell you what go check out the videos on my channel w/ an open mind & I will look at the evidence you bring me.Have a great day.
coolvideo28 9 months ago
@coolvideo28 Explain Dinosaurs with Feathers. Scientists have found over 20 different ones.
Some other Species that possess transitional features: Epidexipteryx hui, Protoavis, Protarchaeopteryx, Archeopteryx, Avimimus, Sinosauropteryx, Caudipteryx, Rahonavis, Shuvuuia, Sinornithosaurus, Beipiasaurus, Microraptor, Nomingia, Tiktaalik, Epidendrosaurus, Cryptovolans, Scansoriopteryx, Yixianosaurus, Dilong, Pedopenna, Jinfengopteryx, Sinocalliopteryx, Sinornis, Ambiortus, Hesperornis, Ichthyornis
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz I have debated you sooo many times and proved evol. a complete Fraud over and over you no evol. is a lie so why are you still trying to pretend you believe in it and lying about evidence. Please dont answere me. I will continue praying for you bye.
coolvideo28 8 months ago
@coolvideo28 Evolutionary Biology is still taught at every major university, you haven't proven anything. And you are too brainwashed to argue with.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz Ya and the quran is taught in every school/university in all muslum nations does that make that crazyness true. As usual No logic. Then why do you keep commenting to me again please dont answere bye
coolvideo28 8 months ago
@coolvideo28 Correct, the quran is bull shit which proves your holy book is just as good as it is.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz Nope the quran just copied a small part of the Bible and wrote nonsense the truth always gets copied the Bible is Gods living word if you dont know it then you dont know the truth. Nothing could be more ignorant then ignoring what are Creator says about his Creation.
coolvideo28 8 months ago
@coolvideo28 The bible is not gods living word. Like all other books it was written by men. Specifically at the council of nicea when christianity was still a cult practiced by many groups who all had their own ideas of what it should be/was. The bible was created to unify those groups and is a combination of their ideas/beliefs. Sorry but thats just plain ol history.
Cinthorc 8 months ago
@Cinthorc Wow almost everything you said was wrong. Gods living word was inspired by God writen by men.The word was writen way before the council of nicea they just compiled the Books into one book the Bible. Christianity started in the begining when adam spoke and had a relationship with God it just wasnt called Christianity yet because Jesus CHRIST hadnt come to earth yet to live and die and rise again for You me and everyone. You need to get some real history try reading the Bible.
coolvideo28 8 months ago
@coolvideo28 So your historical reference to back up your claims regarding the bible is a story from within the bible? ...have you read many other books? have you read any ancient mythology? the bible draws parallels to old world religions intentionally to have made the transition from polytheism to monotheism easier on pagan cultures. Tell me, do you believe any American or European history? I know its not outlined in the bible or anything but trust me, its legit.
Cinthorc 8 months ago
@coolvideo28 LOL! the pure stupidity of this statement assures me you wouldn't make it through test chamber 1.
GladosHal3000 8 months ago
@GladosHal3000 You just dont know the truth, until you study the Bible and pray to Jesus God for wisdom and understanding you will never know the truth.
coolvideo28 8 months ago
@coolvideo28 Right, because as we all know, personal experiences and dogma are the basis of any sound facts. That was sarcasm... don't agree with it.
GladosHal3000 8 months ago
@GladosHal3000 I just use common sense and believe What God says about the Creation he Created, there could be nothing more ignorant then ignoring your Creator he knows everything.
coolvideo28 8 months ago
@GladosHal3000 Just some weeks ago some scientists found a galaxy far away that is supposed to be much older than the big bang is supposed to be.. does that mean that big bang theory is fail now?
greken145 8 months ago
Comment removed
GladosHal3000 8 months ago
@greken145 When/what are you talking about? In January we discovered the oldest galaxy to date which suggests galaxies are able to form faster than we may have first thought (about 500 million years after big bang) and thats about it. Even if you did mention something pre-dating big bang or something older than would have originally been thought possible it means only that things are even older than 6000 years. Thats whats wonderful about science, its always correcting itself, unlike scripture.
GladosHal3000 8 months ago
@GladosHal3000 Yea, at the same time it means that science can be wrong. There are many unanswered questions about big bang. And about scripture..the problem with atheists is that they tend to see Bible from a physic point of view which is completely wrong. The mening with genesis isnt to explain us scientifically in every detail how the earth or univerese was created. Its mening is to show us that there is a God who loves us and wants us to save ourselves by following his rules.
greken145 8 months ago
@greken145 Yes, science can be wrong. Atheists generally don't have a problem with what you just described from the bible points of contention arise when followers take it literally and then create videos like this one.
GladosHal3000 8 months ago
@greken145 People have died in the past because they went against the teachings of the bible. The bible was written to be taken literally. Henry Morris father of modern creation science said and I quote "Thus it is obvious that one can reject the historicity of Genesis I only if he likewise rejects the rest of the bible as well. The only bible-honoring truth is, of course, that Genesis I-II is actual historical truth". I'm an atheist, but I wish more theists shared your views, but they don't.
mmawilldesha 7 months ago
@mmawilldesha What do u mean by the "Bible was written to be taken litterally?" Cause the Bible i know is full of for ex. symbolisms. And are u talking old or new testament? I honestly dont know who that guy is and i dont wait for others to tell me how i will believe in something. I can discuss different ways of viewing things though.
greken145 7 months ago
@greken145 Well, if you're a creationist then you should know who Henry Morris. He is the reason for videos like this. I might've jumped the gun, because I assumed you were a creationist theist. What I mean by written to be taken literally is that the people who wrote the bible weren't messing around when they wrote it. Had you been born in the times of Giordano Bruno and said that you didn't see the bible from a physical point of view you would've been either killed, or put in prison.
mmawilldesha 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mmawilldesha hence the skull in the stone was destroyedreligious fanatics possibility
thoostorm4 3 months ago
@greken145 Again I'm an atheist now, but before I was a christian for 17 yrs. I was taught growing up was that everything in the bible is true end of story and to never question it, if you do you go to hell. That's why I see it from a physical point of view, that's what I was taught, and that's way most atheists see the bible that way. It's good to know that some christians take the bible literally word for word as things that have actually happened but that was not the intentions of the writers
mmawilldesha 7 months ago
@mmawilldesha Well, then u were taught the wrong way. Jesus said clearly: "u want to have an eternal life, follow me", He never said anything about punishing those who go against, He even forgave those who killed Him. Bible isnt an easy book to understand, some words might have ment something completely different before in time and some verses might be symbolisms or metaphors.
greken145 7 months ago 3
@greken145 Also to anwser your question, when I wrote that comment I was talking about Genesis which is in the old testament.
mmawilldesha 7 months ago
Comment removed
ZZYY86 9 months ago
I have read it completely twice. Both the Old and New Testaments. However I didn't stop with the Jew propaganda. I read as many ancient historical texts as I can dig up. I find the Bible, like I said before, a weak translation of the Sumerian Tablets (among others). The Bible is not the word of God. It is the censored words of Lord Enki written 12,000 years ago. The Old Testament is a history of the JEW, not of the gentile and written to hide the fact the Jew is not the follower of Creator
SpincterManBubba 1 year ago
The Bible is a plagiarized re-write of the Sumerian Tablets which date thousands of years before the Bible was written. At best the Bible is 10% correct in it's account of creation and the rest is nothing more than the history of the Jews written by the Jews. Also if you do your real homework you will find that the God of the Jews is Lord Enki, not the prime creator of all things. Sadly Christians believe in the same Annunaki/Sumerian God as the Jews.There are better references than the Bible.
SpincterManBubba 1 year ago
@SpincterManBubba The proof of the Bible comes by reading it.
For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. Hebrews 4:12
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
One of the most engaging features of crazies is that they attract ever more entertaining crazies.
puffin02 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@puffin02 yes u tubers like you attract more u tubers
thoostorm4 10 months ago
And the Conquistadores gave to the Head of the Children of the light of the Sun,
a Bible, then he threw it to the ground, he didn't like weapons they had, he saw
the hypocrisy. By doing this he took away the religious mask off their faces.
This children of the devil when they felt discovered, massacred hundreds of the Children of the light of the Sun that had come out to greet them in peace.
isanewday 1 year ago
The WICKED conquerors that went there to steal, destroy and kill.
They found a group of people where there was no prostitution,
their crops fed every one, and pacific in gesture.
Admitted by some of conquerorS in their death bed.
isanewday 1 year ago
@isanewday The conquerors were not Christians.
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
So some civilizations from a few thousand years ago made intricate drawings in the earth, mapped the movements of the moon to make reliable calenders. They supposedly made "working flying machines", could supposedly preform brain surgery, and had porno. How is this a "more advanced" civilization? Even if all of this was true (which I doubt the last two claims very much); today we have been in space, we have computers, hell we have working lights (evidence says they didn't even have these).
bigggyd 1 year ago
Scientific questions are settled in court? Great. Just have federal judges figure it all out, make their rulings and all the scientists who write "wrong" opinions will be jailed and fined. That fixes all the nasty bickering nicely.
GospelHouseKat 1 year ago
tosser
shootjohny 1 year ago
The truth is foolishness to those who are perishing.
I believe the Bible as the truth about creation..
I won't be 'Worm food...'
jamesglory1 1 year ago
The guy's insane.
Cluck away all you want, deadhead. All you're doing is telling everyone you're loopy.
puffin02 1 year ago
No way im watching this crap for 44 minutes.
Whatever4690 1 year ago
lol, look at his 'arguments' below. Tell us the truth for once - you're shockofgod, aren't you? xD
EddieTheFishReturns 1 year ago
haha i stopped watching after this guy said "demonstrate amazing technology... and the co-existence of humans and dinosaurs."
Believe what you want, but for the love of God (yes, your God), don't be proud of it in view of the public. You'll only "demonstrate" how ignorant creationists really are.
sbkang85 1 year ago
@sbkang85 Creationists are very interested in real science, not science fiction.
All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
@sbkang85 Please show us our ignorance in a public SCIENCE forum.
All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BereanBeacon1 Instead of continually challenging the people that understand biology to a contest held in a forum specifically not designed for science, why not challenge the creationists to take their evidences into the actual scientific arena?
Do you think creationists are too scared to try real science in the forum where real science is done? Because what you're doing now is comparable to issuing a biker build-off challenge and holding it in an emergency room.
TheScienceFoundation 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1 We've already shown creationists to be utterly ignorant of anything resembling science in the actual scientific arena, the life science prize challenge is not in a scientific forum.
What part of that is so hard to get?
TheScienceFoundation 1 year ago
This video is not scientific and everyone should know it isn't. First of all, this was an isolated case of human fossils and dinosaur fossils placed together. Most likely there was an earthquake or upheaval that brought older rocks up several layers. Second, myths generally contain large, fantastic versions of modern animals. Last, if this a-hole wants to mess with public school, I'd like to see him present a case to the supreme court.
MunkyDrag0n 1 year ago
@MunkyDrag0n We don't want your schools that people like you have destroyed. Cluck, cluck.
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1 Oh, poor little Creationist. Still letting the big bad public school system bother you? Well, the truth hurts. If you want to listen to what unqualified people and an over 2000 year old book are saying, then be my guest. Consider yourself the best damn thing God ever created, cause you know what? It's not going to matter in the next few decades when you creationists are all but extinct internationally and a minority in the US.
MunkyDrag0n 1 year ago
@MunkyDrag0n Cluck
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1 Cluck you, Creationist, Cluck you too.
MunkyDrag0n 1 year ago
Patton and his ilk spam the Internet with this kind of drivel and it is deplorable. It should be immediately evident to anyone who listens closely that Patton cannot even keep his own lies straight within a given presentation.
Patton's academic credentials are a hoax and he knows it, but he has no qualms about making a living exploiting the weak of mind and propagating these lies.
If he was merely deluded, one might excuse him, but there is a deliberate effort to deceive occurring here.
obsops 1 year ago
@obsops All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK.
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1 A repost for you: That "Life Science Prize"? It is a joke. Number 5 ("Evidence must be scientific, that is, objective, valid, reliable and calibrated") on the list is a problem for creationists. Look up the Dover Trial. The evidence and lack-thereof has already been settled in court.
Any valid scientific study would pass peer review. Creationists have NO science to back them up and don't follow the scientific peer review process. YOU are the chicken.
Get an education.
jknengr796 1 year ago 2
@BereanBeacon1 10,000 is chump change compared to how many nobel prizes scientists have won. You can't evolve from a chicken. The mammal split from the reptile chain before the dinosaurs existed but remained small like mice until the dinosaurs died. The birds split after the dinosaurs became extinct. Your remarks show you are ignorant, close-minded, rude, and generally unpleasant individual. You're grammar may be better than that of your fellow Creationists but you are still over your head.
MunkyDrag0n 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1 "CLUCK, CLUCK"
What are you, an infant?
Clearly you must think your response was quite clever, since you have repeated it in your response to others as well.
A $10K Life Science Prize? Science is not a box of cereal. To a scientist, the prize is in getting things right.
This Patton person is a con man pure and simple.
And your appetite for conflict does not sit well with your own Christian doctrine.
When I die I will become worm food, nothing more, as will you.
obsops 1 year ago
Don Patton has no degrees or scientific background and is academically dishonest by claiming a Ph.D. The "Ph.D". is from an unaccredited diploma mill run by his close friend Carl Baugh. Lying for Jesus has no bounds especially when you need money to run your "ministry".
jknengr796 1 year ago
@jknengr796 Richard Dawkins has never written a peer review science paper, so there.
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1 Early in his academic career he did. His recent (past 20 years) has been dedicated to writing books to offend Christians. He is an arrogant jerk. He does however hold numerous degrees from real universities.
Patton has no background other than in theology (no real degrees there also) and utters complete and utter pseudo-scientific nonsense to offend educated Christians and keep the ignorant and intellectually challenged dumbed down.
jknengr796 1 year ago
nice footage kinda pushing your own views and one sided with the jesus junk,
andypanda105 1 year ago
SHOW ME ACTUAL EVIDENCE EVOLUTIONIST BITCHES!
Forallilovebook 1 year ago
@Forallilovebook See the big box next to the word SEARCH ? Type in the words proof of evolution and hit ENTER. There is enough evidence here on youtube. See cdk007, DonExodus, AronRa videos.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@Forallilovebook Read something not writen by clueless men in the bronze age.
cjdragon1988 1 year ago
@Forallilovebook Read a science book moron.
gregrutz 1 year ago
Read Answers in Genesis website. Oh yeah, you Evolutionist bitches can't read.
Forallilovebook 1 year ago
@Forallilovebook Answers in what? You don't start with the answers and look for evidence that fits. You look and the evidence and see what it predicts.
gregrutz 1 year ago
Creation evidence?!? A poor attempt to prove evolution wrong is not evidence for creation.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz not poor. Tell me some lies in it.
Forallilovebook 1 year ago
@Forallilovebook Start with the first sentence. ''the further back we go the more advance technology is''
Get real !
Nothing support creation or a global flood.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz haha, lies. Nothing supports True Evolution
Forallilovebook 1 year ago
@Forallilovebook DNA proves Evolution of Species.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz DNA is not accurateafter 1,000 years idiot
Forallilovebook 1 year ago
@Forallilovebook carbon/radiometric dating is, idiot. in fact i'm willing to bet you have no idea what either of those dating methods are or how they prove the earth is 6.54 billion years old.
myco578 1 year ago
@myco578 Carbon dating is getting a rock and doing a bunch of tests on it. It's very accurate to up to 50,000 years. And since your an illeterate, you must know Carbon Dating is a form of Radiometric Dating. Neither of those prove the world is 6.54 Billion years old, and no one has ever proven it. *facepalm*
Forallilovebook 1 year ago
@Forallilovebook i said carbon dating "/" radiometric dating. okay fine, how about Rubidium-strontium dating, which has a half life up to 50 billion years. there's more than just carbon dating, there's 17 well known methods for measuring the actual age of the earth, not just making shit up like the bible. and its 4.54 billion i made a typo.
myco578 1 year ago
What?, Where is the evidence that Nazca Villagers used hot air balloons?. Sophisticated math to figure it out that is not an astronaut?, LOL. The Nazca Villagers had gold?, LOL. FALSE. The images in Nazca were created to point at were the water was located at and the Astronaut is just a man who was drawn during the 1600 AD. Dinosaurs in Nazca? LOL. Caral which is way older civilization than Nazca and just a few miles away never showed any dinosaurs draws. BS BS BS BS.... Ignorant old men.
Caleta280 1 year ago
when i was child I found small stones with nazca lines graved on them,,,the monkey and the bird figures,,,,unfortunatley they built the a patio of the schools there we didnt say nothing ,,we were to small to know this stones were important,,,to Peru,,,This place was located in South Lima
Maratrushka 1 year ago
Why are people being eaten by herbivores?
Skeletons = mythical monsters.
Like dragons in China and the rest of Asia where many fossils are found
cjdragon1988 1 year ago
@cjdragon1988 When any animal is hungry or threatened they become opportunistic eaters. This is true of the bear today.
The dragons of China are found on the Zodiac along with eleven very real animals. Why then would the Chinese put a myth among them?
12bamish 1 year ago
@12bamish Mess with the bull, you get the horns, not eaten.
Most bears are omnivores, like us meaning, they eat what is available and/or convienient.
There is a tribe of Native Americans that had "dragon" myths based on pterosaur fossils found in the area, they didn't know they where old, the "giant sky monsters" could still be around as far as they could tell.
cjdragon1988 1 year ago
Art does not prove evolution wrong. Keep trying.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz ..what makes something beautiful to the eye of the beholder?
Why is beauty subjective?
Explain this in scientific terms to me.....you can't
EPIC FAIL!!!!!
mockerofscoffers 1 year ago
@mockerofscoffers Sorry I thought we were talking about science.
Darwin did not know about 'mutations' and he showed how evolution works, I don't know why you are stuck on them.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz ...you confuse me...........we will never change each other will we brother...?
I don't hate u ..i luv u.........peace my brother...i dont want to argue anymore...iv'e said what i have had to say.
mockerofscoffers 1 year ago
@mockerofscoffers ''we will never change each other will we brother''
Correct, no matter how much proof for evolution there is, you will never accept it. There is nothing I can do to educate you. Nothing I can show you to change your mind.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz .......and vice versa
mockerofscoffers 1 year ago
@mockerofscoffers If I gave you the component parts of a colour TV could you construct a working TV from them? If the answer is "no" then using your "logic" colour TV's are designed and constructed by "god".
lewisner 1 year ago
@mockerofscoffers What one conciders beautiful depends on ones standards, based on the life experiences of the indeviduals.
cjdragon1988 1 year ago
@uberownagemonkey ...genetic mutations are not beneficial.........they do not add information to the genome.
Dawkins could not even give one example of this happening.
You parrot what you have read by secular science...it is not truth
mockerofscoffers 1 year ago
So why don't we find dinosaur fossils in rock younger than 65,000,000 years?
gregrutz 1 year ago
Do some research on this guys academic credentials...
wjcsydney 1 year ago
That Museum must be getting hush money.
thechessstick 1 year ago
Hillbilly
odinata 1 year ago
Pretty significative that the user who posted this video, also claim to be:
"Searching for Evolutionists Who will Defend Their Position (DEBATE DODGERS)"
...which coincidentally has been removed by the user.
:D
alphaimposter 1 year ago
America is doomed. We have god on our money, Britain has Darwin. We are truly a nation of dim wits.
macharius188 1 year ago
@macharius188 Don't worry. Evolution removes Stupid Genes from the pool, so religion is doomed.
lewisner 1 year ago
@lewisner Mmyeah.. As this vid shows, people were smarter the further we go back. The pyramids themselves are a testimony to that fact. The oldest one is the best preserved one. By far. That means the earliest builders were better at it then the later ones. That's a pattern you see all over the world. If one would bother to look. Evolution is a fairytale. Grow up.
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@EdjeBos "As this vid shows, people were smarter the further we go back. " LMAO!
The average life expectancy was 30.........let's try to dig up some Peruvian computers or mobile phones shall we?
They had good architects and unlimited slave labour to build them.
lewisner 1 year ago
@lewisner Nope, they didn't have computers and such. And yet, here they are! And we, with our computers are unable to copy most of it. And still you don´t see. Yes, they had good achitects! And engineers, doctors, blacksmiths (metallurgy), etc. They found batteries, The evidence is all around you, staring you in the face. So the Inca´s had slaves? You know of the average life expactancy of the people from 2000 to 3000 BC? Tell me your sources.
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@EdjeBos Enough. Continuing this convo will damage my cerebral cortex. If it is satire, you are very good at it.
lewisner 1 year ago
@lewisner Yeah, I understand the transition from non-thinking to thinking can hurt.. And indeed, my humour knows no boundaries! I see you failed to produce the sources for your fantastic claims?
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@lewisner So then tell me......just how did those dinosaurs end up on those stones? I would like to hear what you would consider the most logical explanation.
carp1844 1 year ago
@carp1844 Go to Wikipedia and search for Ica Stones. There were genuine stones found in the 16th century but these did not depict dinosaurs. In 1966 Cabrera (not Cabera - the maker of this video didn't even spell his name right!) was sold the "dinosaur" stones by a farmer Basilio Uschuya who later told police he had carved them himself.
On Wikipedia please read carefully the section "Exposure As A Hoax".
lewisner 1 year ago
@carp1844 Here are two ideas for that. If it were true that dinosaurs co-existed with Nazca Villagers. Then they would had existed with the Chimu, Caral and perhaps even later on with the Incas.
Nazca is about the same time as Chimu. Caral is way older than Nazca, none of this other empires has any sort of draws about dinosaurs. Is it possible that Nazca villagers found dinosaurs fossils and study them?, or is more possible those stones are purely fake.
Caleta280 1 year ago
@Caleta280 I appreciate your logical approach to this and you make some good points. I feel it would be honest to inform you that I do have a biased opinion. Through extensive research of other civilizations mentioning or depicting dinos coupled with my understanding of Bible prophecy and the holes in evolution I am thoroughly convinced of the Genesis creation. These stones fit into my world view therefor in my opinion deserve a bit more of a chance at the table before being quickly dismissed.
carp1844 1 year ago
@carp1844 ''These stones fit into my world view ''
Yes, if it fits you accept it, if it does not fit you dismiss it. That is how religions work, but not science.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz You will notice in my comment that I simply said "they fit into my world view". I did not ,however, say that I firmly believe they are genuine. I simply said that I think they deserve a chance at the table before being quickly dismissed. In other words people should not jump to conclusions until ALL of the facts are in. If nothing else my statement shows that I am honest enough to not take an affirmative stance one way or the other on these stones. I would welcome such honesty from you
carp1844 1 year ago
@carp1844 I know that dinosaurs died off in the last of 6 major mass extinctions that happened on the earth, about 65,000,000 years ago, honest.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz Prove it.
Forallilovebook 1 year ago
@carp1844 "people should not jump to conclusions until ALL of the facts are in". The facts are that no fossils of the dinosaurs depicted have been found here, in fact those dinosaurs were mostly confined to Arizona. The original stones were discovered in the 1600's and none of them depict dinosaurs. These stones were "discovered" by a farmer in the 1960's and under examination by police he admitted he had carved them based on Dinosaur books. If they were genuine they'd have been claimed by Peru.
lewisner 1 year ago
@lewisner Are you of the opinion that people are getting smarter? Advances in technology do not represent the average person. Advances in technology are built upon the discoveries of previous generations therefor you cannot compare using technology. My parent's generation could name all US states and every president by the 3rd grade. A third grader that can do that now would be a rare exception. This is only one of many examples. Your logic is flawed.
carp1844 1 year ago
@carp1844 The failings of the American education system are not a good barometer of human intelligence as a whole.
A large proportion of Americans believe an invisible man created the entire universe in one day 6800 years ago.
If you went to Sweden or Finland most people think that is nonsense.
You are not using any logic at all, let alone flawed logic.
lewisner 1 year ago 2
@lewisner I'm a Creationist and I don't even believe that.
Forallilovebook 1 year ago
I was promisuous in my youth, I was rebellious, I sold drugs, I mocked the Bible (tho I never read it), I openly mocked God and made fun of Christians.
But God, who is rich in mercy, forgave me; my past present and future! When I repented of my sin and accepted Yeshua (Jesus) as The Promised One, The Messiah, The Christ! Praise God! I'm forgiven!
Bible is true, God is real.
wdc1958 1 year ago
@wdc1958
amen for your testimony!.. i too led the same life style, i called it "the foolish years" lol... but im happy you found Jesus, and he is a trillion times more happy, you can believe that!..
also, whoever it was that said the Bible speaks of the world as flat and the center of the universe is obvs too ignorant for you to spend your time talking to.. the Bible actually speaks of the earth as being a sphere, which back then was no fact!
JusJuiceIt 1 year ago
wow, the Bible says the earth is flat?? Show me where!
The Bible says the earth is the center of the universe? Show me where!
Fact is, you wouldn't believe til you're bound "hand and foot and cast into outer darkness where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth."
Bible is true, God is real.
wdc1958 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
funny how most atheists generalise and call Christians uneducated and ignorant.
And all of a sudden they are all experts on rebutting every piece of anti evolutionary evidence.
This just shows the mindset and utter arrogance of their condition......so sad.
mockerofscoffers 1 year ago
funny how most atheists generalise and call Christians uneducated and ignorant.
And all of a sudden they are all experts on rebutting every piece of anti evolutionary evidence.
This just shows the mindset and utter arrogance of their condition......so sad.
mockerofscoffers 1 year ago 3
@mockerofscoffers This isn't evidence - it's just silly nonsense. Can't you tell the difference? You should read more and you wouldn't accept nonsense as fact.
masala505 1 year ago
@masala505 ...you would have no idea how much i read or know....evidence is not proof of anything..it is just that...EVIDENCE.........Like the evidence you have presented to me... about "MOST ATHEISTS generalising" on what they think they know.
You are the proof in the pudding to my initial post...........I rest my case.
mockerofscoffers 1 year ago
@mockerofscoffers
amen!.. very well put my friend, we must pray for them!
JusJuiceIt 1 year ago
@mockerofscoffers What anti evolutionary evidence?!?
''millions of fossils buried in mud all over the world, looks like a flood to me''
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz ...let me rephrase..."The lack of evolutionary evidence"
Macro evolution has as much evidence as a fable.
And yes there was a worldwide food.......Whats the problem there?
mockerofscoffers 1 year ago
@mockerofscoffers There is a mountain of evidence proving evolution, there is also a lot of evidence showing there was never a global flood. What is the name of the mud layer with all the fossils in it?
And search proof of evolution There is enough right here on YouTube.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz .....you mean the strata..yeah why do they find trees through all different levels of the strata that are meant to be millions of years in difference?
Same tree through the various levels..what happens when you get a jar of mud rocks and sand and stir it up....when it settles it does so in layers..sounds like flood evidence. Macro evolution is a farce why don't you Youtube ppsimmons and look at the fairytale that seculars science has concocted since the days of Darwin.
mockerofscoffers 1 year ago
@mockerofscoffers ''funny how most atheists generalise and call Christians uneducated and ignorant.''
That is really stupid.
Scientists, not atheists, or anyone who has read a science book thinks you are uneducated and ingorant.
gregrutz 1 year ago