Trotsky
4:26
Added: 4 years ago
From: vidyohistory
Views: 92,936
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (654)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Go to hell boy, I'm Slavic, which I highly doubt that you are, take a trip to any country in Eastern Europe and says that Trotsky's Russian, let's see what happens to you...teen slacker.

  • ""Leon Trotsky was a Russian revolutionary??""

    He was JEWISH, not Russian, whose real name was "Lev Bronstein"

  • @Puszko You can still be Russian and Jewish! FFS,what do you think Abrahmovich is? He is Jewish but also Russian. It's not difficult to understand is it?! Idiot.

  • @vorkutaman He does not belong to ethnic Russians and I quite understand what it is, Abramovich, Rabinovich, Shlomovich and many others, all Jews ... and idiot it`s your father, I did not have offended you... animal.

  • @Puszko Oh dear, another internet fool talking bullshit. Go take your medicine,durak.

  • Lenin and Trotsky!!! wow i wish they where both still alive we would learn so much from these 2 great men!

  • @KGBspartan4 Yes.. they were best at killing these 135 MILLIONS of RUssians...SHALOM!

  • @VendPrekmurec Lol.

  • хорошо

  • Burton was a great actor, but the Trotsky film is lousy.

  • @CaptainCrunch35 Tha is a myth..Lenin was also murderous and so was Trotsky..Trotsky fell victim to the same system he had helped to create so he should not have expected any mercy. Stalin killed a lot of communist who themselves had killed others with great joy....why should anybody be sorry for that.

    Communism=ideologically organized massmurder and enslavement of peasents and workers. A more feudal slave state than the USSR and China didn t exist.

  • @am1966ath China has surpassed the US as the number one nation in the world though... because Maoism in a sense gave way to the same principles Trotsky and Lenin sought. One vanguard party for a nation under a socialist democracy. Shit even Americans are starting to immigrate to China, boy if our comrade could only see this.

  • @esesolox3 China, after Mao abandoned state communistic economy..but the secret police, the party is well and kicking and opressive as ever. Mao and his ideas didn t gave way to anything other than shit, hunger,social disorder and poverty. Mao is no architect of Chinas boom-times...he is the demon the chinese are hidding.

  • @CaptainCrunch35 Hah! that's what I always say, though I say it as "Stalin... was no communist, he was a power-hungry dictator, who strangled Lenin's communist vision while it was still in it's crib"

  • wasnt that Richard Burton playing Trotsky?2:15

  • As a supporter of Trotskys ideas, it's actually quite heartening to find that the most vocal opponents and haters of this guy are people who support Stalin, Mao, and are apparently extremely racist towards Jews. As someone once said to me, "Every now and then you have to step back and realise, 'I'm arguing with some dumbass who has a Stalin avatar. Haven't I already won?'"

  • When Trotsky was asked by Lord Breaverbock and the hated Hearst whether heh still believed in Marxist Proletarian Revolution, he told them: "This is a tragi-comic misunderstanding.." as he took their money. This is the "red hero" worshipped by you stupid labor aristocrat traitors. Wake up, revisionites... TIME TO DIE!!! LONG LIVE STALIN, YEZHOV, MAO AND LIN BIAO

  • am i the only one that got TRAUMATIZED by the ice pick scene ?!

  • @vito22andolini I KNOW! I was like, "Noooo, thats where his brain is!!" :(

  • Trotsky was a great revolutionist and a great thinker. He should have led Russia.

  • We terminated the fucking stalinist!!! Comrade Trotsky :) This time we killed Stalin!!

  • @Bolshev1k 9/22/2011 is a great victory day!!!! We terminated the stalinist workergirls who was insulting TROTSKY!! LONG LIVE COMRADE TROTSKY!!!

  • Poor Trotsky!!!!

  • @ThaPacsta Im a communist. And I beleive in god. I don't like the ideology where you have different relgions. Just beleive in god.

  • @JuliusIsMe hum....that is kind of anti-communist and borderline racist

  • Im captiancrunch35. New account, anyways, fuck stalin.

  • Why are some idiots praising Stalin here? Want to know what his legacy is? THE USSR IS GONE!

  • @AndrewMann552

    Because he killed this vermin just like Adolf killed Röhm. Could you imagine guys like Bronstein and Ernst running countries like Germany and Russia. London would have kept its empire if they did.

  • @BENNYSIEGEL90 Actually Trotsky advocated using the Red Army to intervene in Germany and help the Communists there stop the rise of Nazism. Trotsky was warning the world in detail what trash Hitler was while Stalin was making idiotic pacts with Nazi Germany. And as I wrote earlier, Stalin's main legacy is that the USSR eventually collapsed, plus he regularly made pacts with England and other right-wing forces. BOOKS, use them LOL

  • @BENNYSIEGEL90 Actually ignore my previous comments, I looked at your page and apparently you're some sort of neo-Nazi lunatic.

  • Where is the part where you talk about how Trotsky threatened the families of red army soldiers? Or his time with the mensheviks?

  • poor trotsky!

  • Can anyone said me the name of the song from the first part of the video, please?

  • @Kreldoom trying to find out that myself, found this though in th e meantime /watch?v=Rfs0XEF_1sU

  • asesino de miles de campesionos en ucrania solo por ser anarquistas y no quererse someter a su dictadura "proletariada" . este fue un asesino pero muchos comunistas lo toman como su dios junto con lenin y el papa marx.

    no entiendo la diferencia entre fascismo y comunismo

  • Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin all deserve each other; a putrid Bolshevik troika. Let Zinoviev, Kamenev and Bukharin carry their mummies into the catacombs of Leninism and incinerate themselves. Or hack each other to death with ice picks (Leninists don't just massacre non-Leninist socialists, but also each other!).

    Then we will be rid of this authoritarian Bolshevik madness and can begin to envision a truly humane and libertarian socialism.

  • back when communism was fresh and all about the revolutionary zeal and ideology

  • ƸӜƷ•*´¨`*•.¸☆ TROTSKY WAS A TRAITOR ☆.•*´¨`*•.¸ƸӜƷ 

  • @hmustache Who is the traitor, Trotsky, who wanted a worldwide revolution and freedom, or Stalin who established a totalitarian regime for 30 years and was prayed like a fascist leader ?

  • He was a real communist, because he believed in freedom, work, and equality. Not like Stalin, who was a totalitarian nazi pig

  • he got an ice pick that made his ears burn!! the stranglers 1970!! haha

  • Trotsky o Gorbashev dos primeiros tempos da URSS: traidor inocente e bobo. Contribuiu decisivamente para o fortalecimento dos fascistas.

  • Perhaps it was best for all of us that Stalin outsmarted Trotsky. Trotsky wanted a World Revolution which meant destroying capitalism all over the world. And how did he plan to do that? WAR. Stalin wanted to keep communism in Russia and wisely so. Trotsky was too brilliant for his own damn good. Thank you, Stalin, for getting rid of him. LONG LIVE CAPITALISM.

  • I started reading the book ''under the sign of the scorpion" by juri lina and it lays down important historical events in a complete different fashion than whats been the broadly kowns facts about it un the West. It = mind blowing stuff i recommend it to anyone who is interested in the history of humankind. The books is full of grammatical errors (like my post ) but english is not his motherlanguage nor is it mine.

  • @masterBizan

    I'm in the process of reading that book too. I know for a certainty that Russians are aware of whatand who was behind the so called "Russian Revolution"!

  • Is this is an accurate portrayal of the man's death? That shriek made me shudder, I felt sorry for him..

  • @armand011

    Frank Jackson, Trotsky's killer, said in a later testimony that once he struck Trotsky with the ice pick he heard the longest and loudest scream he'd ever heard in his life. So the film probably toned the brutality of his death down a bit.

  • @htcfagg That's truly harrowing, and terrifying..

  • Russia would have been so much better off had Lenin lived and Trotsky remained in power alongside him. Lenin's death paved the way for Stalin to doom the idea of Marxism. Damn him.

  • Great video and great man.

    Trotsky actualy believed what he said and was a humble server to the cause of the workers revolution.

  • I liked this except for the Richard Burton clip. I thought it detracted from the seriousness of the subject matter.

  • would anybody like to explain why he first made sure he got rid of anarchists

    if he was for the workers

    confused.

  • Trotsky NO GRACIAS!!!

    Yo tambien haria lo que hizo Ramon Mercader, clavarle con gusto el Piolet >:D

    Un traidor a la lucha comunista, un burgues seudorrevolucionario disfrazado de bolchevique, sabiendo que fue un MENCHEVIQUE!

    y que solo ```apoyo``` a Lenin, cuando la revolucion bolchevique tomo gran fuerza y se acercaba la victoria comunista!

    Trotsky NO!

    Gora Marx! Gora Engels! Gora Lenin! Gora Stalin!

  • Read his autobiography, "My Life".

    Great book.

  • This guy had big balls

  • I'm learning about communism still, and right now Trotsky and Tito seem like the best guys. Tell me your thoughts. Maybe on why one is better than the other or anything like that.

  • @Togglebog96 indeed ,Tito just wanted that his people was free and trotski was the best communist ever, even George Orwell who hated communism describes Trotsky as a hero in animal farm

  • @Togglebog96 Tito was not a great guy - he was not as cowardly or worthless as Stalin, no, but he can be placed in a similar category to people like Castro. He was still hostile to the idea of real worker's democracy, the thing that Trotsky fought for and was murdered for. I don't think Tito would have considered himself a Trotskyist, and Trotsky would not have supported Tito. Tito still represented a privileged layer, and defended that privileged layer against the mass of the people.

  • why did communist hate capitalism?

  • @TheFarmerboyproducti Because capitalism makes everyone into slaves, unless you are really rich.

  • @unifieddynasty

    capitalism does have its cons friend, but I wouldn't exactly describe it as " makes everyone into slaves ".

    But I would say its a good concept poluted by banks and the rich.

    thank you

  • @TheFarmerboyproducti Capitalism; defined by Karl Marx as "Exploitation of the proletariat by the bourgeoisie". It IS pretty much a happy face stamped over slave labor. It may seem like a good concept but it's not, what you think is referred to as the "Illusion of Capitalism".

  • @TheFarmerboyproducti They did not. If you read any of Marx , Lenin, or Trostky, for example, the basic idea is that industrialism leads capitalism eventually to socialism.

  • Russia should build and put great and notable monuments of Leon Trotsky in all russian cities in order to respect the memory of this great russian hero, who reformed the Red Army and defeated the foreign interventionists, something which Stalin wasn't even capable to dream about, much less to implement in reality.

  • @Deckye Wall Street bankers gave the Bolsheviks the equivalent of a billion dollars in gold,which they used to equip the red army.They had the best former Tsarist generals Jewish money could buy.Trotsky was a Jewish supremacist who wanted to enslave Russian Christians.He was also a sociopath with a narcissistic personality disorder,so he was hated by everyone who knew him.

  • @Deckye Yeah but Stalin was anti-Trotsky

  • @Deckye

    Plus Stalin's idea of military tactics was a mass suicide run.

  • @Deckye

    Reformed the Red Army? He actually established it you clutz! A man that had not military experience! Typical Trot dumbass!

  • @Deckye Monuments to the devil, you can put in your country! In Russia, this will not happen, i hope so...

  • @Deckye I'm a trotskyist, but to say Stalin didn't defeat foreign interventionists is a lie. Even if we discount Stalin's massively important role in wwii, his role in the civil war is much understated. He was looked to by Lenin to turn numerous large battles into the soviets' favor.

  • @melsm26 It was Stalin who saved Petrograd from Yudenich in may 1919, it was Stalin who saved Tsaritsyn back in 1918 along with its supply line that vas vital to the Soviet Republic and it was Stalin's ally Budyonny who crushed Denikin in autumn 1919

  • "These trials developed not from communism, not from socialism, but from stalinism"

    This is what the world doesn't know and is the main reason why millions around the world hate and condemn communism and socialism, because they believe that it is the communist and the socialist ideology's fault why millions of innocent people were imprisoned and killed, while in reality, it was stalinism which did all these atrocities.

  • @Deckye Trotsky was the worlds sorest loser,pissed that Stalin won instead of him.He was willing to do anything to destroy the Soviet Union.Including collaborating with the CIA  and the Gestapo.

  • @Steelie1963 read a book or two pal. or are you gonna start some hippie rant about dont believe everything you read?

  • @oljackson99 According to the books I've read,Stalin won and Trotsky lost!Trotsky called on the Red Army to overthrow Stalin.The purges were justified to eliminate Trotskyite elements,including Trotsky himself who should have been purged in 1929.This is how it goes down in one party states(see Hitler vs. Rohm).Stalin was a major figure in 20th century history,unlike Trotsky who is only a footnote.

  • @Steelie1963 yes im aware of that i studied it for 3 years. trotsky did not lose in any democratical sense, he was ousted by force and lucky not to be killed earlier by the tyrant bully stalin. the likes of kamenev were not so lucky. stalin was a major figure yes, but he was a dispicable power hungry dictator who was directly responsible for the starvation of millions of his own ppl. earlier u made a comment saying you though he was a great man and you hate blacks and jews. racist cunt

  • @oljackson99 Trotsky criticized Stalins collectivisation program for not being militaristic enough i.e. not shooting enough people.Trotsky was a bloodthirsty tyrant who would have killed millions.I never said I hated Jews and Blacks,I only want to be free of Jewish corruption and Black degeneracy.How do you feel about Pakistanis gang raping English girls and home grown terrorists?You are another white liberal idiot who doesn't know his own country is being stolen from him.

  • @Steelie1963 trotsky was none of those things. and i am aware of the state of this country, last saturday i was car jacked in chapeltown, leeds by 3 black guys and robbed at knife point. i dont allow such things to cloud my sensible judgement though. i have also had my house robbed by white lads in my time as a student here, so its crime from all angles. trotsky was incredibly liberal and a good man for it! he only had the peoples interest at heart. unless every book ive read on it lied to me

  • @oljackson99 Try reading the biography by Robert Service who said 'Trotsky was close to Stalin in his intent,he revelled in terror'.He invented blocking units and ordered the executions of thousands of opponents,so yeah a very liberal guy!I've been a victim of crime myself,so I have sympathy for you.I grew up in a white town and things seemed a lot safer and cleaner back then.I'm an advocate for sterilizing white trash criminals,we need to clean up the gene pool!

  • @Steelie1963 well all im saying is i studied the russian revolution in great depth and i never saw a shred of evidence to suggest trotsky executed thousands of opponents. im sure this guy has said that, but its his word against every other historians. i feel i am at good jurisdiction to say hes incorrect on that

  • @oljackson99 What's your take on the Kronstadt rebellion?Instead of engaging the sailors in talks Lenin and Trotsky organized a massacre.After assembling red army divisions,on 5th March 1921 Trotsky made his 'Shoot them like Partridges!' speech.Blocking units were set up to mow down reluctant soldiers and thousands were killed in repeated assaults.After the fortress was overrun 500 sailors were shot on the spot.Over 2000 sailors were later executed.ALL POWER TO THE SOVIETS!Down with Bolshevism!

  • @Steelie1963 They were absolutely right to attack Kronstadt. It doesn't matter what their political ideology was. I used to have doubts about the action against Kronstadt. Those doubts evaporated as soon as I saw a MAP of the place. No sane person, whether Bolshevik, anarchist, or any other political ideology, would have refrained from the attack on Kronstadt, at that time of the year, in that military situation. If they had stalled at all, they faced the reopening of the front. Good on them.

  • @dalellll So the only justifiable massacre of striking workers in history was ordered by Trotsky?Using this logic the Nazis were justified in their mass executions of Jews because it was saving them from anti semitism! Trotsky wanted to suppress democracy because he knew he would lose an election,and the white armies were a spent force because they wern't backed with Wall street money.The Bolsheviks plundered Russia of it's wealth.The only winners were the Jewish bankers.

  • @oljackson99 Check out Emma Goldman on Trotsky re Kronstadt 1921.

  • @Steelie1963

    Service's biography was recently discredited by the The American Historical Review, which stated that it "fails to meet the basic standards of historical scholarship". For more information google "wsws Robert Service".

  • @Hardwyck The best biography I ever read was 'Young Stalin' by Simon Sebag-Montefiore.Stalin was a dedicated Leninist from 1902.I admire his 'expropriations' and how he shagged his way around Russia,leaving a trail of broken hearts and illegitimate babies.I couldn't imagine Trotsky as a bank robbing serial seducer!Stalin was a genuine outlaw, and it was fitting that he became leader as the Bolsheviks had no mandate.The SR's won the election and should have formed a government.

    1

  • @oljackson99 " Unless every book ive read on it lied to me" You might actually be on to something when you say that in a total disbelieving fashion :D

  • Trotsky, a great hero.

    He was sometimes very brutal, like during the crushing of the Kronstadt rebellion, but definitely he was the real great hero of the Russian Civil War during the 1919-1923 period.

    Under Trotsky's leadership, the Soviet Union would've been a real democratic socialist paradise, instead of a stalinist socialist dictatorship, which it was even after Stalin's death in 1953, and it was stalinism which in the end contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union.

  • We have exterminated the property owners in Russia.We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America.

    (The Jew,December 1925,Zinobit)

    --The world revolution which we will experience will be exclusively our affair and will rest in our hands.This revolution will tighten the Jewish domination over all other people.

    - Le Peuple Juif,February 8,1919

    This book is very detail about their plan,please read it for free on internet.

    Who Is Esau-Edom..Who Is Esau-Edom..

  • The world could so use a Trotsky today...

  • @ProletarianRage I'm proud of my white heritage.Every modern invention,every advance in science,medicine,exploration,t­ransport and technology were all made by white men!All the great composers and most of the great philosophers were white men.Our civil society guarantees property rights and the rule of law.If it wasn't for your white heritage you wouldn't have a pot to piss in.We also invented modern sewerage systems!

  • @Steelie1963 Science was long practiced by the ancient Greeks, early Africans also pioneered arts and science, renowned technology and great philosophers were found in the middle east, rule of law is universal, and your idea of "property rights" equates to stealing land from the natives. Nothing you mention has anything to do with Anglos, and nothing you said even resembles a fact. Do yourself a favor, shut up and stop proving your ignorance.

  • @truthslap The ancient Greeks were Caucasian,and their scientific discoveries and democratic ideals are still being used today.Why do you discount your heritage?Name one African scientific discovery still being used today and I'll shut up!The pilgrims found out the natives were savages and exterminated them to ensure the survival of the colony.As for Anglos how about Da Vinci,Newton,Watt,Tesla,Benz,E­dison,Watson and Crick,Bell,Marconi,Logie -Baird,Von Braun,Ford,The Wright brothers,Whittle,etc.

  • @Steelie1963 ancient Greeks were not Caucasian, they weren't from Caucas, they wouldn't have thought of themselves as anything other than Greek. They would've thought of you as a non-Greek, a barbarian. xenophobia is the only thing you had in common. Africans were first to practice arithmetic, mineral mining, organized fishing expeditions, plan cities, mummify their dead, etc. They discovered America before Columbus. I could go on for days. also, half the people you mentioned are NOT Anglos.

  • @truthslap A caucasian is anyone west of the ural mountains and north of Africa,including all people of european descent including all the scientist/inventors on my list.Can Anglos only come from the British Isles?Your definition is too narrow.As a pan-european I believe all people of European descent around the world are part of the European race.Egyptians aren't Africans you moron,they are arab-semitic people.Sub-Saharan Africans never even invented the wheel or written language.

  • @Steelie1963 Yes, Anglos DO come from the British Isles, that's not a narrow definition it's a fact. There is NO European race, I am a European myself and I am VERY much different than the Anglos, French, Germans, Turks, etc. According to your definition even the Russians are Anglos, that's just ridiculous. the ancient Egyptians were NOT Arabs, they were most likely a blend of races, based on an AFRICAN civilization. Sub-Saharan Africans had writing, the wheel, math, and farming since 6000 BC.

  • @truthslap It's time for the truth to slap you in the face!There have been repeated waves of immigration into the British Isles over the centuries.Romans,Vikings,Norma­ns,Saxons etc.You are either being disingenious or you're ignorant.Sub-Saharan Africans never invented any thing,all they had was what others gave them.All modern inventions came from men of European descent.Part of the greatness of Europeans is our diversity.Languages,cultures,d­ress,music,literature,all of it uniquely European.

  • @Steelie1963 I'm speaking to an American who knows NOTHING about Europe, and you're making all these flimsy, untenable stretches to fit your nationalist, racist point of view. There has been open immigration in ALL of Europe, not just the British Isles, for thousands of years until shortly after WWII. What you don't understand is that European cultures retain their identities, and almost never homogenize with the foreigners. There is NO "uniquely European" you dope, these are DIFFERENT cultures.

  • @truthslap I'm from New Zealand you moron,a great nation founded and built by my British ancestors.There HAS been open immigration between European countries which proves my point about the mixed ancestry of all Europeans.Immigrants into the US came from many different European Nations and they assimilated into the mainstream culture easily.Only a brainwashed self-hating white man would deny the importance of his own legacy.

  • @Steelie1963 As for the Romans, Viking, Normans and Saxons, we're talking about an entirely different time period than the rest, that sort of forceful immigration happened over a thousand years ago. The Anglos still make up the majority of Brits, as I already mentioned, European culture is very adept at breeding among themselves. The majority of Brits consider themselves 100% Anglo, with all the identifiable traits to match. also Sub-Saharan Africans invented their OWN writing and math systems.

  • @truthslap During the Apartheid era in South Africa they had a serious problem with illegal immigration.Black Africans were literally dying to get into the place,because living standards and working conditions were much better than their own countries.Why do 'refugees' always seek asylum in European run countries?Because they know that soft hearted white people are going to look after them.Nationalism is growing in all white majority nations.Europeans around the world awake!

  • @Steelie1963 Colonialism including South Africa created jobs in the short-term, but it's a top-down structure that equates to nothing more than stealing the native's land and resources, certainly it causes immigration in the short run, but the actual promise of wealth is non-existent. secondly, Europeans do assimilate in America, they don't as much in Europe, my family hasn't left Portugal since the 1400s. thirdly, Africa is every bit as culturally diverse and historically important as Europe.

  • @truthslap I have a workmate from South Africa who is English-Portugese,he was smart enough to come and live in a majority European Nation where corruption and anti-white discrimination isn't endemic.I'm sorry I called you a moron,you sound like an intelligent guy,and I will always defend your right to an opinion.Arguing on the internet is like the special olympics.Even if you win you're still a retard!

  • @Steelie1963 I can certainly agree to disagree. I won't be supporting any kind of racism myself, I think it's the lowest common denominator, it divides societies, impoverishes honest workers, and causes untold senseless violence. I'll just end by saying that nations are wealthy for many reasons, usually from their colonies and trade routes, and race has absolutely nothing to do with it. I believe you're a rational individual that's unfortunately been taken by nationalistic cultural assumptions.

  • @ProletarianRage What's a syntax?Is it what you pay a prostitute?It must make you feel intellectual and superior to use such big words!I've never met a 'socialist' who wasn't a selfish lying hypocritical POS,just like you.If you promise to visit North Korea and never come back I will gladly buy you a one way ticket.

  • Robert Service and other leading British academics have launched a campaign of historical falsification, slandering Trotsky, and denying his historical significance. The purpose of the campaign is to prevent young people coming into political struggle from learning about Trotsky's political legacy. David North of the World Socialist Website has written a number of essays in defence of Trotsky - see "Political biography and the historical lie: An examination of Robert Service’s Trotsky" on wsws

  • what is the song BTW?

  • He could speak english?

    If only if they had him instead of the dunce who singed a non aggression pact with Hitler.

  • Trotsy was a mass murderer. The only difference between him and Stalin is that Trotsky was not in the saddle in the end. The ideological difference is cosmetic and overplayed. Stalin and Trotsky were interchangeable evil bastards - even Trotsky was possibly the bigger warmonger. It's shame they didn't icepick each other to death at the same time so the left wouldn't turn the loser into a saint (as they tend to do so they can reinvent history).

  • @jiros00 Theyve done the same thing with Che. You can see this repetitive thinking with the left. The dead ones become "martyrs", & the living ones that exercise power become scapegoats for an explanation that they werent "true communists" like the dead ones would have been. Communism is going to keep popping up over & over again, repeating the same mistakes. Unless the left choose to learn that its a ridiculous theory which can never work. More people will die unless we learn from history.

  • @TheMedievalMan

    I agree with you about how many on the left idealize those who have died, but the left isn't one monolithic block.

    The left =/= communism. Yes, some leftists are communists, but I would say, at least in the West, most of those on the left are not communists and have more of a social-democratic character.

  • @RudeDan Yes, I agree with you. The kind of leftists I am referring to here are the commie admiring crazy leftists, who have no clue how to learn anything from history. Many of them are young ignorant people who have a seriously flawed view of history. You would think that the most murdering ideology in history, would convince people to learn a little better. Yet that is sadly not the case. Although I disagree with socialism, I know that there is a difference between socialists & commies.

  • @TheMedievalMan Commies? If you mean the whole wave of XX century communism it´s simply a mess, Castro, Mao, Stalin, Lenin are simply mass murderers, and people citing them as heroes are simply wrong.

    Now trotsky was one the worst mass killers and psychopatic man on history, at the extreme of kidnapping women and kids as hostages during rebellions, and having aproved the use of chemicals and toxic gas against the Kronstadt rebels on 1921.

    But do not play Marx on this, he was a great theorist.

  • @Mrgokueldestructor I disagree on that final point, Marx was no good theorist. He merely wrote a book saying that wealth, family & class differences are the root of all evil, so lets use the state to abolish them. Workers of the world unite indeed, under a seriously flawed ideology. The traditions that we practice, & how we economically trade with one another is not wrong. It is simply taking things too far, moderation is the key here. If you want social justice, then become a Distributist.

  • @TheMedievalMan Well, i´m not saying i´m a complete Marxist, the man had some mistakes and maybe took too far his beliefs, but nobody has explained better the function of capital, materialism and conditions for a social change, and yes, those are only tehories.

    I don´t like dogmas either nor extreme ideals, but the state is correctly portrayed as the source of pain, poverty and corruption on the society, i think it should reduce it´s functions, and we should adopt a social economical system.

  • Trotsky had a lot of blood on his hands himself; he was especially brutal to his own soldiers as head of the Red Army, and exiled to the coldest part of Russia the very same soldiers that fought for the Revolution, when they rebelled against the oppression and racism of the Marxists.

    That being said, the coward that killed Trotsky was rewarded by Stalin with the "Hero of the People" medal; Stalin then went on to kill 30 million of his own citizens for their land. Pretty blood history....

  • Real name: Lev Bronstein :)

  • @karlkarlkarl1234 Therefore, mate :) He was a Jew...

  • @viktoruschka Oh, really? A subversive, destructive and marxist Jew?? Really...? How "rare"...

  • @InertLoop Hehe, I hope I'm understanding your irony, mate... As you seem to be a very cultured person, you perfectly know that most Soviet leaders were Jews (Lenin, Kaganovich, Zinoviev, usw) and they weren't precisely the most non-violent and pacific people on this world. So, if we add to this little historical fact, the killing of Palestines which is being performed in Israel, it's natural to have a ver poor opinion on Jews... If you didn't meant what I thought, sorry! My apologies! :)

  • @viktoruschka NO! You have a huge "prejudice" against these noble creatures. For instance, we have a Jewish runned government here in Argentina with a kykess as president and guess what? They are encouraging MORE brown immigration from our trashy neighbors, feeding MILLIONS of ghetto parasites with more and more welfare (OUR money), and now they say we are not anymore a country with mediterranean ancestry and traditions, oh no, we are part of Latin America and amerindios. I love these people! :D

  • @viktoruschka Jews are good people when you get to know them. All they do is try to DESTROY US, that's all. Not big deal, who cares! They are NATION-WRECKERS, that's what they know BEST... how to DESTROY NATIONS. So, let them do their Job, for christ's sake and please, don't forget to be nice to them :)

    ta ta!

  • @karlkarlkarl1234 Not Lev. Leiba.

  • @karlkarlkarl1234 His Jewish heritage was one of the main reasons he was against Stalin's non aggression pact with Germany, too bad he didn't get to live to see the end of it, and the red army kick some Fascist ass.

  • Modern tyrants have things much easier than their predecessors…. No Phillip II could paralyze freedom of thought more severely than a modern censor. How much more efficient than the guillotine of Robespierre are the machine guns of Trotsky!

  • JUST A BUNCH OF LIES OF THE COVER AGENTS OF TROTSKY-FASCISM. THIS MOTHERFUCKER TROSTSKY SPENT MOST OF HIS LIFE OPPOSSING AND ATTACKING LENIN AND OPPORTUNISTICALLY JOINED THE BOLSHEVICS AT THE LAST MINUTE. (AUGUST 1917). STALIN JOINED 1903. HE WAS SO STUPID TO ENGAGE THE POWERFUL GERMAN ARMY WHEN THE RED ARMY WAS BORN, REFUSING TO SIGN THE BREST LITOVSK PEACE AGREEMENT WITH THE GERMANS. THE GERMANS OVERRAN RUSSIA AND TOOK WHATEVER THEY WANTED. DEEP INSIDE HE WANTED TO DESTROY THE REVOLUTION.

  • “The Workers’ Opposition has come out with dangerous slogans. They have made a fetish of democratic principles. They have placed the workers’ right to elect representatives above the party, as it were, as if the party were not entitled to assert its dictatorship even if that dictatorship temporarily clashed with the passing moods of the workers’ democracy. " Leon Trotsky, our dear "democratic" Communist.

  • Trotsky supported Stalins invasion of eastern Poland,and would have supported the execution of 20,000 Polish military officers and members of the gentile intelligentsia by the jewish NKVD.

  • Trotskys only critisism of Stalins collectivisation policy was that it wasn't 'militaristic' enough.A euphemism for not shooting enough people.He would have sent in his jewish executioners Yagoda and Koganovich[son of Cohen] to do his dirty work with the order'Don't economise on bullets!'He would have enjoyed a reverse pogrom in the Ukraine and would have cheered and clapped when Koganovich told him about the rising pile of bodies.

  • Simon Sebag-Montifiore wrote that Trotsky was wrong about Stalin.He wasn't a mediocrity,'He was extraordinary in every way'. Stalin also hated Trotsky on sight. You gotta love this guy,go Stalin!He also wrote that before meetings commenced there was a large amount of locker room style banter ,from which the uptight Trotsky abstained.Another reason to dislike this weasally jew.

  • Every year an lenin-order for Ramón Mercader, posthumously!!!

  • Marx, Engels, Rosa Luxemburg, Lenin, Trotsky. Who will carry on the works of these majestic people? Long Live the revolution

  • @mpawlak10 Are all communists as in denial as you?

  • @bonfirejovi what do you mean?

  • Lenin wanted trade unions and Soviets to remain independent.Trotsky was opposed to this and forced the Soviets to be State controlled.A democracy was stangled at birth and this totalitarian environment set the stage for the mass executions and repression that followed. It culminated in the Kronstadt massacre,on Trotskys orders which is when all hope was lost and the Soviet Union became a distopian hellhole,seven years before Stalin came to power! Try reading Emma Goldman.

  • @Steelie1963 Dream on. the sailors in Kronstadt in 1921 were new recruits not the same ones as 1917, fooled by anarchists and foreign agents, their leaders who fled ended up advocating a foreign intervention to restore monarchy, it's a sad event but the decision to fight it was the right one, and it was a collective decision with Lenin and Zinoviev.

  • @Longlivethe4th Beside, in 1920 Trotsky had advocated a limited kind of NEP to answer immediate economic problems. The others refused so he had to enforce war-communism, whose brutallity was a reason for Kronstadt rebellion.

    These were tough times and nobody's perfect. However, there is a clear difference between a world revolutionnary course (lenin and Trotsky) and a conciliatory (socialism in one country...) one which signed Popular front pacts with any force barely "progressive".

  • @Longlivethe4th I find Trotskyites with their preachy earnestness and their facial hair to be very annoying,and thats only the women!After reading'Young Stalin' by Sebag-Montifiore,I have to agree that Trotsky was wrong about Stalin,and being whacked with an ice plck was a fitting end for him.

  • @Steelie1963 I won't discuss personal tastes, do you have any logical argument to back them or not ? (in which case we could just stop right here).

  • @Longlivethe4th According to wikipedia over 90% of the Kronstadt sailors were from 1917 and their list of demands was moderate and fair.The future of socialism has to be anarchism-syndicalism.Marxism-­Leninism is for the history books.Long live the workers and sailors of the Kronstadt naval base!Long live workers democracy!Down with jewish bolshevism!

  • @Steelie1963 Yeah, all hail anarcho-stalinism !

  • @Longlivethe4th I admire Stalin because he was an amazing man,and I consider myself to be a national-anarchist,socialism will only work in a whites only environment with no jews blacks muslims and other undesirables,including self hating white people like you.

  • @Steelie1963 thank you for your frankness, now I know your "socialism" will never happen, it's just a classic brown-red silliness.

    as for stalin, he had a talent for bureaucratic manoeuvering, but really nothing else. He was just the face that the rotten apparatus chose to promote at that time.

    oh and why do you think I hate myself ? I'm French I'm proud for Robespierre, the Paris commune may 68... but not for De gaulle Sarkozy or Mitterand and the rotten unions...

  • @Longlivethe4th It looks like both of our socialisms will never happen,but we're still allowed to dream.I'm a great fan of Jean Le Pen, a great european patriot.You seem to be in denial of the massive problems caused by immigration in France,it's never too late to take your country back.

  • @Steelie1963 Le Pen is one of the wealthiest men in France, and I think it's people like that who create the real big problems. If some turbulent youth (some immigrants some not) cause troubles that's mostly because the system has no real place for them and because they adopt the twisted image of themselves that TV spreads. It's not too late to unite all sections of the working class against the establishment. The refineries strikes could have brought down the governement.

  • @Steelie1963 Fascism in socialist guise is no socialism at all.

    You disgust me, class traitor.

  • @ProletarianRage You disgust me you useful idiot jewish dupe!Where there are Africans.there is Africa.Where there are Mexicans,there is Mexico.Where there are Europeans,there is Europe!I grew up in a town where we never locked our doors.Now we need security systems and voluntary patrols to keep the savages at bay. People of European descent are the only people who are taught to hate themselves and feel guilty.For what?being the most creative and progressive people in history!

  • Who am I useful to, exactly? I wasn't sure I understood, your grammar and syntax is exceptionally poor. I don't hate myself, but nor do I take pride in my white heritage. One cannot be proud of a heritage, because it is not something one accomplishes. I am proud only of my realization that socialism, one which combines in solidarity all the people of the Earth, is the only possible road to the future for Humanity.

    Watch your back, class traitor. The revolution is coming.

  • @ProletarianRage You have no understanding of history.The Jewish ideology of Marxism-Leninism was promoted as a way of dominating and manipulating the people of Europe.The large majority of communist party leaders were Jewish,and many idealistic party members were unaware of the secret agenda.Useful idiots like you!You are a race traitor who deserves whats coming to him.I bet you've never heard of the Wichita Massacre and the Knoxville Horror(google if you dare).

  • Well I never knew Trotsky was English!

  • What movie is 2:14-3:29 from?

  • Anyone who supports communism: send me everything you own. Prove it. I'll decide what you deserve to get, and I'll give you whatever I own that I think you should have.

  • @ShaolinTaoist It's funny but also quite sad how many people have no clue what communism really means and then go on to display their ignorance by spouting nonsense like this and thinking they've made a clever criticism. Have you ever heard the term "strawman argument"? Look it up some time. And when you're done with that, try finding out what the communism actually is, since you obviously don't know at this point.

  • Jewish piece of excrement.

  • Trotsky was a jewish tyran & murderer of Russian people

  • @SlavicFront88 Thumbs Up.

  • Гитлер не уничтожил столько своего народа,сколько Сталин и Троцкий.В архивах значатся не все