Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thanks for having the balls to speak out!

  • I feel sorry for you

  • @GreenandGoldChampion on the contrary. i feel sorry for you. & all the other Paulqaeda who are sinking their time, money resources to a failed candidate & a loser. even worse HE KNOWS he will not win, he's just splitting the GOP/conservative vote for the spotlight.

  • @mrltavern So along with the power of abrasiveness you the ability to read the minds of politicians everywhere, praise the mighty and insightful mr. l

  • Ratings have been disabled because you know you're wrong. LOL

  • @Luieburger DUH no bc I know that you as loyal Paulqaeda will sit there all day hitting the thumbs down much like you sit on your computers all day looking for online polls where you vote over and over again for "DR." Paul to make it seem like he has a lot of people who would vote for him to make him seem legit.

  • @johneverymann1 no I just refuse to deal with psychos who want to change the subject in order to protect Ron Paul.

  • @biggstanker OH SHUT THE FUCK UP. GET OFF MY PAGE. He talks over again about how the president needs to go to Congress & he's a Congressman if he really believes this he will never do such a thing. get the fuck out of here & go support that loser until your asshole bleeds.

  • Maybe Paul is counting money from Iranian's Military in his "More Money from the Military" talk. Well Paul can (After this election) go and become Al-Qaeda's Lobbyist. His might as well get paid for the job he has been doing already for them free of charge for a decade.

  • I'll give you a thumbs up and I think you do a better Ron Paul than Mark Levin..

  • @MrTimotheus85 thanks. I still have to hear Levin do it before I will agree with you.

  • (continued) vague answer, that the free market will fix everything.

    It's not like "poof, its fixed", he can't fix it over night, and usually when change is forced that quickly, there are unforeseen recourse.

    He predicts well, like how he predicted 9/11 in 1999, and the econ bubble... yada yada yada, but not sure if congress will even let him do anything, or even if he, himself can even implement anything.

  • @mtktm yes when he states he's going to cut 1 trillion, he's going to have to go to Congress to do that. unless he wants to use some exec power which he will NEVER do. ditto on the 0 tax rate that he said in the debate this week. he would get steamrolled by Democrats if they should ever get power again.

  • @mrltavern He would use executive power to cut spending. Executive orders that were used to create FEMA, DEA, and EPA can be reversed without approval from congress. He would just see that as reversing unconstitutional departments. As commander in chief he wouldn't need approval to bring troops home. Veto bills? You can accomplish plenty without congress.

  • @biggstanker no he wouldnt. that would go against everything he believes.

  • @biggstanker well then that goes against everything he believes. makes him sound more like a fraud.

  • Actually, its been proven. CNN and FOX (surprisingly enough) have shown the results a while ago. (this campaign)

    All campaigning donations and contributions have to be made public. IIRC, donations have to have a name attached and verified to be accepted. Same goes for all candidates

    skip to 2:35

    youtube.com/watch?v=7o7eXmYa5O­c

    I have some reservations about him though. The logic of how everything has gotten to where its at seems sound, but seems to just give the vague (continue)

  • @mtktm yeah but the link doesnt work. & i prob seen it before anyway. main point anything that's been made public it cannot be verified. anyone can just write down what they want in the occupation box. they're not going to verify thousands of donations $25-50

  • I have uncovered the Paulbots who as you know hack Tea Party sites put up fake names and then blast the comments sections with anything that breathes "Paulisms" in the title.....the canned lengthy answers.... if you have time to burn it would be great if you could look at this profile on facebook (damn tries to post link wont let me.. Ill leave you a message

    look at the number of posts, and then google the name, like over 5000 comments a day!

  • the $113k dollars Paul receives from the Military is nothing considering that there are about 250 million active duty military personnel.

    113 people donating $1,000 or 226 military donating $500 is all he receives from a military of 2.5 million individuals.

    RuPaul could easily raise that much from the Bradley Manning-types IVAW DODT freaks.

    It's nothing.

  • Stupid comments removed. Plain and simple.

  • I got that you don't like Ron Paul, but I couldn't find the numbers about the miltary donations--I listened to a lot, but didn't have a whole 30 minutes, esp. with all the harsh name calling and crude talk. But I am really curious to see the numbers and facts you have. Maybe you could make a website or something concise if you have facts to share.

  • @BriansJoy SHUT YOUR MOUTH. you try and prove it and you cannot. I explained it very clearly. there's no way you can prove that it's actual military donating. there's no way to verify that dummy. also, as i said, if he's supported by military why does he lose in areas where military is a large presence ie Ft hood. he lost in 2008 primary with only 5percent of vote.

  • I listened to the first 10 minutes. You had 10 minutes to give references and provide facts a develop a line of reasoning. You didn't do any of that. I am just disappointed that I wasted 10 minutes of my time! Are you familiar with the concept of "providing references"? Did you attend college or something? Did they teach you how to write a paper? Did they teach you how you should provide references for your claims?

  • @emrankhan1389 10 mins. you didnt even hear the best part about the false claim on military donations. oh well, remain stupid. I can't help you. dont want to either. when Ron Paul tards can VERIFY these donations they claim come from the military then we'll talk. also the first 10 mins you fucking mindless retard was my assessment of his debate performance. Also, point out exactly what you want me to verify in first 10 I will be glad to .

  • @emrankhan1389 last comment didnt go through. but I read it. schmuck, dont tell me to be concise when u cant prove CANNOT prove that his donors r military. ur a deceptive group of cunts & theres no way to prove his donors are military and whos not. I've made my case. your a bunch of lying cunts.

  • Have I told you that I love you? Over the top, right on, you tell it BEAUTIFULLY, my friend....you ROCK!!!

  • @RuthSias that's quite different response than I normally get. lol.

  • @mrltavern lol...couldn't help myself....I have quite a bit of distaste toward Wacko Paul - and you lay it out so well....just hit home sweetie.....what can I say?

  • Thumb UP!

    We can work our way around Paulqaeda.

    They don't GET to win every online battle (which REALLY pisses them off - which makes it MORE fun to do).

    (Hope you have comment ratings shut off, too.) 

  • @shellymic thanks. 25 comments in under 20 mins. most just idiotic drivel from paulqaeda. they can't prove shit. yes ratings off.

  • Paulqaeda? Fuck you in the mouth, you fascist cunt.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more