One truly good result from 9/11 was that many people started seeking truth. If everyone would just start seeking the truth? of life for themselves, our world would reflect that honest, serious, and unifying intent. If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click the first result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this, pass it on.
TV Fakery was used on 9/11. Computer graphic images(planes) were inserted into the videos.They may have used some type of low flying plane that day,but it wasn't flt 175 &11.
The US Army had military 'psyops' personnel training with CNN in March 2000, under their training exercise "TRAINING WITH INDUSTRY." The Army site also says they train with BOEING!
SEE>"ARMY PSYOPS AT CNN"
SEE>"Department of Army:Training with industry program"
@lucymo1000 You need help man. Seriously. Tell that shit to somebody that was actually there. You are so stupid. Sucks I wasted ten seconds of my life with you. You don't deserve to breath my air.
Dick Chaney AVOiDS JAiL if LiBERiA ACCEPTS His $500mil PLEA BARGON this is the guy that (non truthers) put their trust in. the liberian government found him guilty and wanted him on interpol. they wouldnt. instead they put the guy from wikileaks on interpol...... fascinatiung ..... i think its criminal not to have a( true) investigation of 911. the families demand it and a large % of the population. it goes deeper than just 911. america must demand it
nothing can be gleaned from these vids. Until people stop being bitrate misers and start using 480p and 720p, anything can look like anything... Just a lot of smeary, jumpy blobs.
“The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who Is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost invariably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And if he is not romantic personally, he is apt to spread discontent among those who are."
@theBartone9119 So all you have to offer is ad hominem. (snore...)
It's whatever you say it is buddy, no need to implore the use of logic here.
If you say an airplane can land inside a building without loosing so much as a rivet, exploding after impact (not during) making a spectacular fireball outside and still having enough energy leftover to shred a 50 ton shop press 2b, entirely collapse WTC's AND keep metal molten hot for weeks on end?
"Dogmas--religious, political, scientific--arise out of erroneous belief that thought can encapsulate reality or truth. Dogmas are collective conceptual prisons. And the strange thing is that people love their prison cells because they give them a sense of security and a false sense of "I know."
1. Post just 15 witness recorded live on 911 of the WTC planes with no connection to the media or government. Considering that there are approx 8 million people in NYC, this should be easy enough, right?
2. Post just 10 family members of the victims from all four planes recorded on video? Just 10 people out of 265 passengers. Easy, right?
@Ackdacka You're a crack pot conspiracy theorist lol There's so much evidence that the official story is true it's undeniable...And don't think I'm assuming that it's not OK to ask questions because it is, but when you get your answers...SHUT THE FUCK UP!
Myself I wouldn't call this ultar slow motion, because it wasn't filmed in ultra slow motion, and when you slow it down, it just becomes jumpy. Which isn't propper slow motion. The film is slow, but iits jumpy, in which it shouldn't be.
Using the slider from 3:32 to 3:48 its very clear to see what I'm talking about but what is it? could it be a refraction of light from debris projected on to the camera lens? I have no other explanation.
at 0:17 something moving extremely fast comes from behind tower one and shoots off out of frame within 0.5 seconds, does anyone else see this? Its very quick but replaying it over and over you can see it is not debris, what on earth is it? Dare I say it is saucer shaped!
@Loudboy187 i see what you mean. it could be number of things, i would say a reflection of something shiny in the sun that was moved shined into the camera, but that wouldnt make sense.
Interesting. First you can see the two engines go shooting out of the building...followed by the APU, (auxilary power unit), which was in the very tail of the aircraft. Each engine weighs about 8,000 lbs and the apu quite a bit less I should imagine...maybe 4 or 500 pounds....but a VERY solid chunk of high-strength steels just the same.
The US has attacked itself and lied about it before people, why is this such a shock?! Google this "Gulf of Tonkin" and you'll find the LIE that got us into Vietnam. 9-11 was the lie that took us into the Gulf once again, only a different gulf this time.
2- Can you do something? Yes, you choose not to based on your #1 and #3 questions. So your order is flawed as is your mindset.
3- Yes it directly effects you, or I should say it did if you lived in New York or lost a family member on 9-11 as I did. If your so shallow that you dont care about the 3000 lives lost that day in an attack on your beloved "country" because it didn't effect your "lifestyle" directly, well, then I pity you and your lifestyle
@squillyb7718 I'm not going to sit and waste my life mourning 911. What's done is done. "I think mathematically with out emotion"
I have sympathy for you if that is the case. There's a reason why people with higher intelligence tend to have other serious mental health issues. You then take into consideration how those things handicap them in other areas, such as the ability to enjoy life, and then ask yourself if being that intelligent is even worth it.
@DAROMSninja Maybe I would shed a tear as well if you did sit and mourn, that is that exact opposite of why I stopped in on this thread. Use some of your passion and find the TRUTH about what happened that day. Learn the truth about the world in which you live. I commented on the hate I saw breeding in this thread, it's uncalled for. Whether its my children or yours someday, they will want to know "how you let this happen" and what will you tell them then, it just didn't fit with your lifestyle?
@squillyb7718 The truth? About what happened on 911? I have watched quite a few documentaries on 911. All of them present "Facts" that I simply do not have time to research to verify if true. The fact that everything is basically a conspiracy "theory" prevents me from believing 100%. Also, knowing is pointless unless you can do something about it, which I cannot. What do i gain by researching? Knowing? Even if I did research, there's an 80% chance I still would not "know" for sure what happened.
@DAROMSninja 9-11?? You need to go way back to understand the truth. 9-11cover up is true, the fact that 19 terrorists operating from a cave pulled this off sounds like the real conspiracy story. I mean come on, doesn't common sense tell you something is wrong when they found more than half of the alleged hi jackers alive and living in other countries?? Doesn't that alone cast a shadow of a doubt? And these are facts that you keep calling conspiracy theories, mostly physics. What's to debate?
@DAROMSninja So what are you saying?.....that you prefer to go on living in a fantasy? The world is a very real place. Freedom loving people of America might have to revolt against those in power who just might be traitors. If you want a future for you and your family, you should want to know the truth about Sept 11th. For instance, why hasn't there been any more suicide attacks inside America since Sept 11th? That fails the stink test.
@DAROMSninja I enjoy life, every aspect. What I enjoy the most is helping people "see" for the first time. I remember things, too many things. That's the gift or curse in which your after. My brain never shuts down like a normal persons would. I pick a "target" and lock on until its solved. Along with this ability to remember facts I also remember things I see that hurt my to my soul. The ignorance taught to our youth, everyone tolerant through the media, I am sad for us all, yet numb.
@DAROMSninja Being able to retain reason and focus without emotion helps me solve complex problems, but you are correct, it does not help me with my family and they most likely suffer as a result. My wife is a strong woman and my daughters are very gifted as well. I wasn't born this way, I was in an industrial accident, the building collapsed on me. This syndrome is a result of the closed head injuries I sustained. When you can take everything aside and study only fact, things change drastically
@DAROMSninja You are ignorant beyond words. Your trouble is you can't even properly assess your own guidelines. Don you benefit by being aware? Would you benefit from being aware that ...the barbarians are at the gate? Can you do something about it? You aren't even looking for ways to TRY...only ways to get OUT of doing something about it. Does it directly affect your lifestyle? Sept 11th affects everybody's standard of living. If you don't get that, then you are uneducable.
This is a business, the United States Federal Corporation and the Israeli governments are involved. The jig has been up for a while now, start telling your families, tell your freinds, tell your neighbors. search you tube for ENDGAME and wake up to whats really happening right in front of your well polarized faces.
@squillyb7718 You got some issues. Basically you just came up with a bunch of bullshit out of nowhere and expect people to follow everything you said/care. There's a strong chance you have a high IQ or some mental disorder that makes you deeply sit and ponder things that are very simple to normal people, you then came to the conclusion that some kind of conspiracy is going on. Meanwhile people like me are living life happily enjoying ourselves.
@DAROMSninja from your other post you have some obvious issues. Your 1,2,3, belief system is very self centered. Bullshit out of no where? EVERYTHING I posted is a FACT, feel free to look it up, it would take less time than it did for you to respond to me. And if you think the Supreme Court definitions according to Cornell Law Library is bullshit you are exactly what I said, misguided. The People came to the conclusion that the "Official NIST report" was a conspiracy, not the other way around.
@DAROMSninja I would like to address this directly "There's a strong chance you have a high IQ or some mental disorder that makes you deeply sit and ponder things that are very simple to normal people, you then came to the conclusion that some kind of conspiracy is going on. "
#1-yes I have a rather high IQ in comparison to the average person. And your also correct in the assumption you made in regards to my health. I don't think like you, I can not. I think mathematically with out emotion
@DAROMSninja Meanwhile people like me are living life happily enjoying ourselves.
JM: The German people were happily enjoying themselves before all hell broke loose in WW2. Can't you see that? Millions around you are suffering.....but you are self centered to the death, apparently. By the time it affects you personally, nobody will be left to care.
@ihatekhomeini shut the fuck up you crazy muslim peace of shit. do as all a favor, blow yourself up, and go to hell earlier just like most of your pig fucker buddies do.
@paintdataint hehe, you fucking idiot. I'm not a muslim, I hate islam, it ruined my country with the help of USA. So shut the fuck up you ignorant fucking fat nigger.
@ihatekhomeini hahaha. you must be from one big shithole to think that. And fat nigger is probably the worst insult you could have said. that is the complete opposite of who i am. thanks for the laugh though.
@paintdataint You write like a retarted nigger, and you probably are one of those ashamed to be nigger niggers. At least my country is not filled with niggers, prostitutes, and hispapics.
@ihatekhomeini I write like a nigger? I am white as snow you ass. And hey! atleast my country isnt filled with a bunch of racist douche bags like yours. so shut the fuck up you bigot.
@ihatekhomeini Your a troll. One of many that tries to take away from the facts being played on the screen. So now you'll go on the tracking software like the rest of them, tracked for all to see lol. Your an idiot and the people arguing with you are idiots. you've done nothing be instigate hate bred by stupidity since you wrote your acclaimed FUCK USA remark. Well done. Now that you know your being tracked you'll disappear right, like the others do?
@paintdataint You fucking Americans created muslim fundamentalism, you destroyed my country by helping these fucking islamic shitheads, if only you could understand history you piece of shit. That's why I say fuck USA. If only the founding fathers where alive. Fucking piece of midwest ignorant fat fucking piece of shit. Go and pray to your capitalist god for more bail outs for wall street, so the poor can stay poor and rich get richer. You are a nigger right?
@ihatekhomeini i cant wait till i turn 18 so when i join the military, I can find your curry smelling ass and fly a plane into YOU and your family and post it over youtube. Then everyone can laugh at your death and say how much of a worthless piece of shit you are.
@ihatekhomeini Whats good about your country? seriously, nobody cares about you. America is the greatest country in the world and I wouldn't want to live anywhere else. You can stay in your shithole.
@ihatekhomeini Haha. Please. I'm just fed up with people from 3rd world countries crying out for attention on youtube by saying "fuck america" when they just wished they lived here.
@DAROMSninja You are seriously misguided and need to do some history homework. America? You mean the United States Federal Corporation don't you? America, isn't a country its a continent. The United States is defined as a FEDERAL CORPORATION and I'm not yelling, legally it has to be in all caps. try using google "us not a country?" and see what you get lol. Please start there and then educate yourselves and your families. Keep that patriotism in your voice, were gonna need it!
(13) “Security agreement” means an agreement that creates or provides for a lien.
(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States;
@doomangel444 of course the educated responder to the PUBLIC thread should shut up. That makes sense. Try saying something logical. And I am talking to you, calling you out on your bullshit and much like most of you uneducated hate mongers you have no tangible response. This crap you post belittles the focus of the OP's video. The FACT that there is a conspiracy by the US and Israeli governments to cover up the true events of 9-11. go to 9-11 timeline to find the truth
@ihatekhomeini Obviously attacking this poster will get you banned, but not before we track your IP. You and the rest of the HATE TROLLS will be extinguished.
Whoa...at like 1:19, did the plane go ALL THE WAY through the building?? I never even knew it went that far! I thought it just got lodged into the middle of the building!
I don't know guys, it just looks like an airplane flying into a building and blowing up. It doesn't really shed any new light on this for me at least.
Let's make the least number of assumptions possible. We can start by eliminating the one about how the United States government, who is wholly incapable of efficiently handling even the most rudimentary tasks, somehow plotted a vast conspiracy to kill its own people and managed to keep it a secret.
@LoveStain your assuming it the visible government, supposed ti m m cveigh was going to b low up a building and he was willing to get some help. but why give him help, the outcome ended the m ilitia movement of 2.5 million ar med lunatics.
9/11 would have been a flawless production if: 1) The impact was more realistic 2) Stick to "blue" skies 3) WHY so many plane trajectories? 4) Layering techniques should be used sparingly 5) The plane "shape" should be consistent 6) Either black or white smoke, not both. 7) Draw in the top right corner of the WTC1, in the above video 8) Enough of the tilting horizons 9) Clue your early reporters in on whats happening. "NO missiles" 10) Sound effects must be consistent.
This 'ultra slow motion' garbage is funny too. The same amount of frames exist, so all this does is increase the time between them, and incorporate frame blending, which further erodes the resolution. Analyzing these videos (which the entire no plane movement is based on) is a joke. No one who knows anything about video would even pretend to do this.
The guy that took this video is either a big liar or he knew that something was going to happen that's why he is crouching so low to take this shot or he is in a manhole also he didn't recorded no sound of the plane he is either plain stupid or someone cut the sound of tape!
What happened to the top right corner of WTC1...??? Draw a straight line along the right face of WTC1 above the smoke. The building was square at time of collapse...???
Hey no brains Why is the smoke WHITE, in the first 10 seconds of the above video, and in the following video the smoke is BLACK, yet the WTC is similarly overexposed in both videos...???
@nobraintheory "i will absolutely destroy you in a video debate. Bring it". Well destroy me and tell me why the smoke coming from WTC1 is white in one video and black in the other, even though the WTC is overexposed in both. And the color of smoke and flame from the WTC2 explosion is similar in both videos. And a clever analogy no brains, because on TV the WTC were effectively as real as your hologram.
"Well destroy me and tell me why the smoke coming from WTC1 is white in one video and black in the other,"
Different cameras look drastically different, it's not all the same camera's exposure. Highlights, midtones, and darks , along with color, are all independent from each other. Some cameras have multiple sensors, etc.
"on TV the WTC were effectively as real as your hologram."
So, let me get this straight. You think the buildings, people, smoke, explosions, etc. were all fake?
@nobraintheory The building is bright white in both videos The Flame is orange in both videos The smoke is white from 2nd impact in both videos The sky is blue in both videos But the smoke is black and white in both videos. And we are talking simple 2001 home video cameras here with 1 low resolution CCD. This event is captured simultaneously , with identical colours and highlights and darks for both cameras. Keep trying ProfessorNobrains,.
Not exactly, look at the top of the towers. You can see the dark upper area in the second video, but not the first. The highlights are different. You can also see the area of smoke that's lit by the sun, and the area in shadow in both videos. It's just more pronounced because there is a great difference in the second.
The WTC is the same color as the smoke in video 1 and the WTC is not the same color as the smoke in the video 2, in fact the difference is from black to white. Fairbanks is underneath, seeing more dark shadow on the smoke therefore we should have less luminous exposure, and the angle of sun would mean less reflection from his lucky vantage. But from directly in front of the WTC with the sun behind us, giving maximum reflective radiant exposure, yet the smoke is black? Keep Trying NoBrains
*****ATTENTION***** Don't let the Disinfo clowns lead you to the physical damage debate, for 8.5 years they can defend it very well. Discuss the VIDEO FAKERY only. They have NO answer for; 1) the different trajectories 2) the black/white smoke from different videos coming from WTC1 at exact time of 2nd impact. 3) Verrazano bridge, out of place and way too big and always moving even when the WTC display nil rotation.??? Don't worry about plane damage PUSH FAKERY
@ProtectAus - "Don't worry about plane damage PUSH FAKERY"
If you weren't lying you wouldn't have to push anything. Investigators don't push, they just look at evidence. You people are like cult recruiters, looking for the least intelligent and most gullible.
@nobraintheory We all know that video FAKERY is not a lie, thats why you come to these sites every day. There is 9/11 conspiracy sites with millions of hits, but here you are, why do you find this so important? And this video is about "Video FAKERY" so why don't you "comment" about it, instead of PUSHING your agenda. And if someone can find this page i don't consider them to be "the least intelligent and most gullible" that honor i leave for "nobraintheory" an appropriate name
@nobraintheory "i teach video production and CGI at a university, and I own a media company. I literally do this all day." How can you teach, mark papers, run a media company ALL day and still have time to troll the web for 10 hours a day, you must have excellent time management skills? And from your stupid emotional arguments about CGI, a debate would be a waste of my time. The EVIDENCE for TV FAKERY is overwhelming, Just face it.
nobraintheory claims to teach at a university and run a media company, yet he posts no videos. I exposed another shill about two months ago. He claimed to be an airline pilot. After a few days, he admitted to being a high school student. The only planes he'd flown had been virtual. He was a fraud, parroting the "official story". I think this is also the case with nobraintheory.
"This account is specifically to laugh and make fun of you"....
This hardly sounds like a "hobby" that a respected university professor or media company owner would take up. It sounds more like what a high school student would post on Facebook. Face the facts Professor Nobrainer, you're nothing but a shill and a fraud. And a lame one, at that.
LMAO! Professor Nobrainer, besides trolling youtube to "laugh and make fun of you", you also a liar. You said NOBODY believes no planes, really? According to you, I'm the only person on this planet that knows no planes were used as weapons on 9/11. That's a lie.
FACT: A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity.
FACT: An aluminum, hollow airliner cannot penetrate and fly through a steel framed/concrete building.
@lmfecher lol you are a fucking idiot. go to college and take some engineering classes or classes on statics...everything you said is wrong and you are discrediting intelligent people who actually know what they are talking about. how do you think a piece of straw could penetrate a wooden barn dumbass? with a high enough velocity, any structure can be compromised, the plane could easily puncture and damage a few columns but to have the whole buildling explode in 10 seconds...that cant happen!
I am a former aircraft mechanic and Gulf War vet. I was trained by the United States Navy in Newtonian Laws and Mechanics and Crash Physics. And I have a Bachelor of Science degree. "how do you think a piece of straw could penetrate a wooden barn dumbass?"...
You're comparing wood and steel, why?
The fact is a 767 cannot fly at 500mph at 800ft. Air density and structural integrity prohibit that speed at sea level. Aluminum cannot slice through steel, period.
@lmfecher lol, have you ever been in a hurricane? when a piece of straw goes 300+ miles per hour, the kinetic energy it has allows it to puncture even thin sheet metal..open your eyes, yeah the plane was 2 mm thick AL and it was going around 450 mph, thats a fact, and yes, the turbines and the airplane shell impacted the front of the building and buckled about 40 2-inch columns...thats not hard at all. what IS impossible is for the 3 floors of fire to somehow buckle and destroy 80 floors...
I have NEVER heard of straw penetrating steel. Wood, yes. Steel, no. Please provide an example of this. As far as kinetic energy goes, I'm glad you brought that up. Here's the answer. In the case of the anomalous entry of flight 175 into WTC 2, you are saying that the force of the 767 allowed it to enter the building. But, you are forgetting about acceleration.
In this case, the acceleration part of Force equals Mass times Acceleration is really negative, that is, it is opposed to the speed of the 767, meaning the plane must decelerate as it makes contact with the building to release any energy.
When the 767 hit the building its mass must decelerate to equal the force applied to the building. But it doesn't decelerate; it just melds into the building, meaning that no force is applied.
@lmfecher "But it doesn't decelerate; it just melds into the building, meaning that no force is applied. "
In reality the plane does decelerate, which if you were interested you could easily prove with a motion track. But you won't do this, because it contradicts your theory and proves you wrong.
You're the cgi expert and media owner, right? Then make a video showing the IMPACT of UAL 175. Show me where the aircraft actually HITS the tower. I mean, you're a professor, right? Then why not assign this task to your students?
"Then make a video showing the IMPACT of UAL 175. Show me where the aircraft actually HITS the tower."
There are already 50 videos, if you can't see the impact in any of them, I can't help you. Hint - It hits where the explosion is, and the giant plane shape hole is made.
"Then why not assign this task to your students?"
Haha. Because they have better things to do than explain reality to someone who doesn't understand it.
@lmfecher - You said "it becomes more apparent that you are NOT a cgi expert or a professor."
I will bet you one thousand dollars I am, and I even own a media company. I have tax returns, references, clients, etc. Bet me.
You on the other hand don't even pretend to have any knowledge of video production or CGI, but you run off at the mouth like you know what you're talking about. You're a retired mechanic. You know NOTHING about video, and it's obvious by your moronic beliefs.
"Ah, but I do know about Newtonian laws and basic crash physics. The videos were faked."
But you won't post the math to support your words, so once again your comment is useless. If you say the crash was physically impossible, it's up to you to support your statement with physics. Without your math, it's just words on a page.
Decide on the bet yet?
"No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11. "
More useless words. All the evidence contradicts your statement.
Why do you insist on changing the subject whenever you've painted yourself into a corner? Only posers and frauds do this. If you are indeed a media owner, professor and cgi expert, then you should be able to create and post your own debunking videos. Why then is your channel so empty? All you have done is parrot the official story. I say again, you are a poser and a fraud.
And in all of the videos of "planes" hitting the towers, NONE of them show IMPACT. Show me a video where the airliner actually HITS the tower. Many of them show the airliner PENETRATING the tower face, exploding INSIDE the tower, and then flying THROUGH the opposite side of the tower. Please tell me Professor Nobrainer, how could the fragile nose cone exit the other side of WTC 2 intact?
Yes, stupid, they do. They all show a giant explosion and a cloud of debris. You just lie over and over and say they don't. It's pathetic. Try watching one that's not in 'ultra slow motion.' IF THERE WAS NO IMPACT, WHAT PUSHED THE COLUMNS INWARD INSIDE THE PLANE HOLE?
"how could the fragile nose cone exit.. "
It didn't. No one thinks it did but Simon Shack and the people stupid enough to believe him.
I watched the video and it shows exactly the same magic act that was performed on 9/11, a commerical airliner flying through a steel framed/reinforced concrete building without IMPACTING the building FIRST!! Deceleration means "slowing down". Your "proof of deceleration" video confirms what I've been saying all along, no commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11. Do you know what really decelerates? A REAL plane hitting a building. It's called crash physics.
Uh... yeah. And it does. You can't argue with this, it's a fact.
"Do you know what really decelerates?"
The plane in this video.
"It's called crash physics. "
Something you like to talk about, but you still refuse to post any math supporting your ignorant, empty words. Why. Because you have done no math, you're just guessing.
You keep bringing up math. Ok, let's do the math. 2+2=4 all day long. But a hollow, aluminum airliner cannot penetrate and fly through a steel framed/reinforced concrete tower, with its nose cone INTACT, ever. The airliner DOES NOT slow down, nor does it IMPACT the tower. No commerical airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
"The nosecone didn't stay intact. If you listened to anyone other than Simon Shack you would know that"..
Not only do I think for myself, I do my own research and arrive at my own conclusions. There are many videos from mainstream media that clearly show the nosecone fully intact as it exits WTC 2, clearly violating Newtonian laws and basic crash physics. Therefore, no commerical airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
Another lie? Have you actually LOOKED at all the videos that show the nosecone exit the opposite side of WTC 2? Here's one of many...watch?v=9cvWwIxMbmE
According to you, the airliner was able to penetrate TWO steel framed/reinforced concrete walls, exiting with it's nosecone intact. Impossible. No commerical airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
"According to you, the airliner was able to penetrate TWO steel framed/reinforced concrete walls"
That's absolutely not correct, I never said that. I've said over and over that's not the nose. Don't pause the video, watch. Where does the 'nose' go? Does it disappear?
You keep acting like you misunderstand, but you know full well what we're talking about.
"If it's not the nosecone we see starting at 1:09 in this video, what is it?"
Plane parts that shot out of the building and were found. Of course, you must think they were fired out of a cannon after the explosives carved a plane shaped hole in the building, when the hologram hit.
Why do you insist on using the hologram thing? Clearly a tactic a fraud would use. I'll ask again, at 1:09 in this video, the nosecone exits out the other side of the tower intact. How is this possible?
Because there is no other explanation for the live tv footage and eyewitnesses who saw a plane. Do you have one?
"the nosecone exits out the other side of the tower intact. How is this possible? "
I've answered this now about 50 times to you personally. Read this carefully: IT'S NOT THE NOSECONE. IT'S THE ENGINE AND LANDING GEAR, WHICH WAS FOUND.
If the plane was CGI why would they animate the nose exiting?
@lmfecher The nose cone is called the "radome" because it houses the weather radar. It is made of fibrglass and it disintegrated on impact. I guarantee it. The ONLY things that survived the impact were the 8,000 pound solid steel engine cores, the solid steel high-strength landing gear, and possibly the auxilary power unit in the tail of the plane. Very little else would have survived. Anything made of densely packed steel on the plane would have survived. The aluminum vaporised on impact.
I know what it's called, I worked on military aircraft for six years. Show me ANY video of UAL 175 actually CRASHING into WTC 2. There was no deceleration OR impact because no commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11. Even the wingtips sliced right through steel beams...impossible.
@lmfecher You're preaching to the choir friend. But you are wrong about the implosion theory. Sept 11th happened just as we saw it that day live....but the hijackers were patsy terrorists working for traitors within the CIA and the PNAC cabal who occupied the White House at the time. Again, you are right but you are wrong. The devil is in the details man.
There were no hijackers because there were NO PLANES. Again, show me a video where UAL 175 actually CRASHES into WTC 2.
FACT: A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity.
FACT: A 767 cannot penetrate a steel framed tower wall, slice through steel core columns, explode, and then penetrate and exit out another steel framed wall with its nosecone intact.
No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
@lmfecher: and then penetrate and exit out another steel framed wall with its nosecone intact.
JM: You are delusional. What is seen exiting the opposite wall of the tower are the two engine cores and some other high strength steel components. The super tough and exotic high strength alloy core of the engines becomes a giant FSDS tank round. A fin stabilized, disgarding sabot, anti-tank round....a penetrator.
"The ONLY things that survived the impact were the 8,000 pound solid steel engine cores, the solid steel high-strength landing gear, and possibly the auxilary power unit in the tail of the plane"...
Really? These are the components that survived? Where are they? The engine found on Murray Street isn't a powerplant for a 767 nor is it an APU. And the wheel section found isn't from a 767 either. So where exactly ARE these components you speak of?
"After the investigation"? LMFAO! Who's investigation? The same people who omitted WTC 7 from the "official story"? Again, the engine found on Murray Street does not belong to a 767, nor does the landing gear found. Airliners cannot fly that fast at that altitude and an aluminum, hollow tube cannot pass through steel without an IMPACT. NO commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
JM: I'm not debating that. I was just saying that any airplane parts that existed belonged to the companies that owned the planes....that's all I meant. " the engine found on Murray Street does not belong to a 767" Did you personally examine it? You arer obsessed with a LIE. What you are doing is hurting the truth movement. You should know to...lead, follow, or get out of the way.
JM: I'm not debating that. I was just saying that any airplane parts that existed belonged to the companies that owned the planes....that's all I meant. " the engine found on Murray Street does not belong to a 767" Did you personally examine it? You are obsessed with a LIE. What you are doing is hurting the truth movement. How do you explain that every engineer in the world watched it yet doesn't believe in implosion. You won't answer this question.
You call yourself a jet mech? The engine found on Murray Street was identified as a CFM56 engine. If you were any kind of mech, you'd know that engine type does not belong on a 767, it belongs on a 737. Any you're lying when you state that "every engineer in the world watched it, yet doesn't believe in implosion", ever heard of Richard Gage, for example?
No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
Hey slacker, if I found the source, I'll bet you could, too. You do know how to use your computer for something other than video games and porn, don't you? Here's a hint...go to google and type in "CFM56 found on Murray Street", or is that too hard for you to do, Skippy?
"If the perpetrators went to that much trouble, don't you think they would have planted the right engine debris"?
Why should they? Americans are stupid enough to believe that what they hear and see on television is the gospel truth. Americans don't read, don't research, and they don't think for themselves, so why bother planting the correct aircraft parts? All they have to do is propose a threat, real or imagined and the fearful sheeple will do anything to be protected.
The video on this page clearly shows the nosecone exiting the opposite side of WTC 2 starting at 1:09. Just another example of MANY videos showing the same thing. You're a fraud, a shill and a coward. No commerical airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
it just went derectly threw like a knife:0
XXNIKXX776 4 months ago
One truly good result from 9/11 was that many people started seeking truth. If everyone would just start seeking the truth? of life for themselves, our world would reflect that honest, serious, and unifying intent. If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click the first result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this, pass it on.
TruthContest 4 months ago
TV Fakery was used on 9/11. Computer graphic images(planes) were inserted into the videos.They may have used some type of low flying plane that day,but it wasn't flt 175 &11.
The US Army had military 'psyops' personnel training with CNN in March 2000, under their training exercise "TRAINING WITH INDUSTRY." The Army site also says they train with BOEING!
SEE>"ARMY PSYOPS AT CNN"
SEE>"Department of Army:Training with industry program"
lucymo1000 5 months ago
The USGOV has been lying to the citizens for decades!
CHENEY LIED about his whereabouts on 9/11. He said he was in his office in the White House.
Cheney went into elaborate details about how he was "bodily carried" to the downstairs bunker.We've all heard his story!
Psychopathic LIAR!
He was in Florida with Bush @8:48am,edt on 9/11.
SEE ABC NEWS VIDEO>>youtube.com/watch?v=UbE5QBMEgjU
lucymo1000 5 months ago
@lucymo1000 You need help man. Seriously. Tell that shit to somebody that was actually there. You are so stupid. Sucks I wasted ten seconds of my life with you. You don't deserve to breath my air.
JonathanMorgan2 4 months ago
911 : THE ACCUSATION - KEVIN SMITH SH0W & ROBERT JAN KELDER
LATELIERDELALIBERTE 6 months ago
2 planes could never take out 2 towers build like they were!!, impossible!!!
onekeypianoplayer 7 months ago
@demarch77
Try spell check before you comment, shit stain. It'll make your ignorance a tad more credible. :)
It's spelled R-E-A-L-L-Y.
lmfecher 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dick Chaney AVOiDS JAiL if LiBERiA ACCEPTS His $500mil PLEA BARGON this is the guy that (non truthers) put their trust in. the liberian government found him guilty and wanted him on interpol. they wouldnt. instead they put the guy from wikileaks on interpol...... fascinatiung ..... i think its criminal not to have a( true) investigation of 911. the families demand it and a large % of the population. it goes deeper than just 911. america must demand it
pederman15 10 months ago
3:40 - 3:48 check out the ufo
shaneshine 11 months ago 5
nothing can be gleaned from these vids. Until people stop being bitrate misers and start using 480p and 720p, anything can look like anything... Just a lot of smeary, jumpy blobs.
theauntiechrist 1 year ago
It doesn't appear to be a commercial airliner which would have been larger and brightly colored.
dyennior 1 year ago 2
that was just a propaganda
armymenz 1 year ago
Hey silly that's no plane, its a black blob.
Or was it moving sooo fast it warped the video camera somehow causing it to be tricked into thinking it sees a black blob?
8:36 Plane makes an amazing landing, no damage to building until passengers disembark.
Then chaos ensues.
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
@GnosticNinja ARE YOU COMPLETELY INSANE?
BurnYourCash 9 months ago
“The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who Is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost invariably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And if he is not romantic personally, he is apt to spread discontent among those who are."
~ Henry Louis Mencken
GnosticNinja 7 months ago
@GnosticNinja Dude you need to be checked out, you are MESSED UP IN THE BRAIN! Grab the straight jackets and everything, I fear for your safety
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@theBartone9119 When a humming bird flaps its wings 10x faster than an airplane can travel a camera can record what the naked eye misses.
Captured in a single frame, the size color & shape of the wings are revealed.
To the blind it matters not what is captured in a single frame, for they see nothing.
To the ignorant un-trained eye they see it but their mind comprehends it not.
"“Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who could not hear the music."
~ Angela Monet
GnosticNinja 7 months ago
@GnosticNinja
Well it still looks more like Flight 77 than a missile, be gone wacko truther! NEXT!
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@theBartone9119 So all you have to offer is ad hominem. (snore...)
It's whatever you say it is buddy, no need to implore the use of logic here.
If you say an airplane can land inside a building without loosing so much as a rivet, exploding after impact (not during) making a spectacular fireball outside and still having enough energy leftover to shred a 50 ton shop press 2b, entirely collapse WTC's AND keep metal molten hot for weeks on end?
Yeah, that DOES seem wacko to a truther!
GnosticNinja 7 months ago
(no W's)killtown*911review*org/oddities/911*html
"Dogmas--religious, political, scientific--arise out of erroneous belief that thought can encapsulate reality or truth. Dogmas are collective conceptual prisons. And the strange thing is that people love their prison cells because they give them a sense of security and a false sense of "I know."
~ Eckhart Tolle
GnosticNinja 7 months ago
watch?v=7Ff_IlvyAQk
watch?v=IObpyT4oRKk
watch?v=AB-5psEuh1Q
“The man who cannot believe in his senses, and the man who cannot believe in anything else, are both insane” ~ Lord Chesterfield
GnosticNinja 7 months ago
The title should be "2nd plane impact with three seconds between every frame." You can't 'ultra slow down' 15fps video. Stupid twoofers...
nobraintheory 1 year ago 15
This has been flagged as spam show
@nobraintheory
I have two easy tasks for ya:
1. Post just 15 witness recorded live on 911 of the WTC planes with no connection to the media or government. Considering that there are approx 8 million people in NYC, this should be easy enough, right?
2. Post just 10 family members of the victims from all four planes recorded on video? Just 10 people out of 265 passengers. Easy, right?
muzicmaker2001 1 year ago
@nobraintheory good go make a vid yourself, and dont troll me bro!
Ackdacka 1 year ago 4
@Ackdacka You're a crack pot conspiracy theorist lol There's so much evidence that the official story is true it's undeniable...And don't think I'm assuming that it's not OK to ask questions because it is, but when you get your answers...SHUT THE FUCK UP!
theBartone9119 7 months ago
Myself I wouldn't call this ultar slow motion, because it wasn't filmed in ultra slow motion, and when you slow it down, it just becomes jumpy. Which isn't propper slow motion. The film is slow, but iits jumpy, in which it shouldn't be.
spikew10 1 year ago
NOSE OUT.
icesurf7 1 year ago
Using the slider from 3:32 to 3:48 its very clear to see what I'm talking about but what is it? could it be a refraction of light from debris projected on to the camera lens? I have no other explanation.
Loudboy187 1 year ago
at 0:17 something moving extremely fast comes from behind tower one and shoots off out of frame within 0.5 seconds, does anyone else see this? Its very quick but replaying it over and over you can see it is not debris, what on earth is it? Dare I say it is saucer shaped!
Loudboy187 1 year ago 2
@Loudboy187 i see what you mean. it could be number of things, i would say a reflection of something shiny in the sun that was moved shined into the camera, but that wouldnt make sense.
icesurf7 1 year ago
@Loudboy187 It's a turbofan engine shaft deflected towards the observer
The shafts would be the first items thro both sides
Unless they hit a floor edge on
They both had the impact energy (and spin) of an artillery shell
Yes, a plane had REALLY BEEN there a moment before...
beachcomber2008 1 year ago
Interesting. First you can see the two engines go shooting out of the building...followed by the APU, (auxilary power unit), which was in the very tail of the aircraft. Each engine weighs about 8,000 lbs and the apu quite a bit less I should imagine...maybe 4 or 500 pounds....but a VERY solid chunk of high-strength steels just the same.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
The US has attacked itself and lied about it before people, why is this such a shock?! Google this "Gulf of Tonkin" and you'll find the LIE that got us into Vietnam. 9-11 was the lie that took us into the Gulf once again, only a different gulf this time.
squillyb7718 1 year ago
Basically there are a set of guidelines I run through before I decide if i want to care or not:
1. Do I benefit from being aware if the conspiracy is true or not?
2. Can I do something about it?
3. Does it directly affect my lifestyle?
Once those guidelines are met, I'll consider giving anything you said the slightest bit of attention. And that would be very generous of me.
DAROMSninja 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja
1- Do you benefit? WOW just WOW
2- Can you do something? Yes, you choose not to based on your #1 and #3 questions. So your order is flawed as is your mindset.
3- Yes it directly effects you, or I should say it did if you lived in New York or lost a family member on 9-11 as I did. If your so shallow that you dont care about the 3000 lives lost that day in an attack on your beloved "country" because it didn't effect your "lifestyle" directly, well, then I pity you and your lifestyle
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@squillyb7718 I'm not going to sit and waste my life mourning 911. What's done is done. "I think mathematically with out emotion"
I have sympathy for you if that is the case. There's a reason why people with higher intelligence tend to have other serious mental health issues. You then take into consideration how those things handicap them in other areas, such as the ability to enjoy life, and then ask yourself if being that intelligent is even worth it.
DAROMSninja 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja Maybe I would shed a tear as well if you did sit and mourn, that is that exact opposite of why I stopped in on this thread. Use some of your passion and find the TRUTH about what happened that day. Learn the truth about the world in which you live. I commented on the hate I saw breeding in this thread, it's uncalled for. Whether its my children or yours someday, they will want to know "how you let this happen" and what will you tell them then, it just didn't fit with your lifestyle?
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@squillyb7718 The truth? About what happened on 911? I have watched quite a few documentaries on 911. All of them present "Facts" that I simply do not have time to research to verify if true. The fact that everything is basically a conspiracy "theory" prevents me from believing 100%. Also, knowing is pointless unless you can do something about it, which I cannot. What do i gain by researching? Knowing? Even if I did research, there's an 80% chance I still would not "know" for sure what happened.
DAROMSninja 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja 9-11?? You need to go way back to understand the truth. 9-11cover up is true, the fact that 19 terrorists operating from a cave pulled this off sounds like the real conspiracy story. I mean come on, doesn't common sense tell you something is wrong when they found more than half of the alleged hi jackers alive and living in other countries?? Doesn't that alone cast a shadow of a doubt? And these are facts that you keep calling conspiracy theories, mostly physics. What's to debate?
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja So what are you saying?.....that you prefer to go on living in a fantasy? The world is a very real place. Freedom loving people of America might have to revolt against those in power who just might be traitors. If you want a future for you and your family, you should want to know the truth about Sept 11th. For instance, why hasn't there been any more suicide attacks inside America since Sept 11th? That fails the stink test.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja I enjoy life, every aspect. What I enjoy the most is helping people "see" for the first time. I remember things, too many things. That's the gift or curse in which your after. My brain never shuts down like a normal persons would. I pick a "target" and lock on until its solved. Along with this ability to remember facts I also remember things I see that hurt my to my soul. The ignorance taught to our youth, everyone tolerant through the media, I am sad for us all, yet numb.
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja Being able to retain reason and focus without emotion helps me solve complex problems, but you are correct, it does not help me with my family and they most likely suffer as a result. My wife is a strong woman and my daughters are very gifted as well. I wasn't born this way, I was in an industrial accident, the building collapsed on me. This syndrome is a result of the closed head injuries I sustained. When you can take everything aside and study only fact, things change drastically
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja You are ignorant beyond words. Your trouble is you can't even properly assess your own guidelines. Don you benefit by being aware? Would you benefit from being aware that ...the barbarians are at the gate? Can you do something about it? You aren't even looking for ways to TRY...only ways to get OUT of doing something about it. Does it directly affect your lifestyle? Sept 11th affects everybody's standard of living. If you don't get that, then you are uneducable.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
This is a business, the United States Federal Corporation and the Israeli governments are involved. The jig has been up for a while now, start telling your families, tell your freinds, tell your neighbors. search you tube for ENDGAME and wake up to whats really happening right in front of your well polarized faces.
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@squillyb7718 You got some issues. Basically you just came up with a bunch of bullshit out of nowhere and expect people to follow everything you said/care. There's a strong chance you have a high IQ or some mental disorder that makes you deeply sit and ponder things that are very simple to normal people, you then came to the conclusion that some kind of conspiracy is going on. Meanwhile people like me are living life happily enjoying ourselves.
DAROMSninja 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja from your other post you have some obvious issues. Your 1,2,3, belief system is very self centered. Bullshit out of no where? EVERYTHING I posted is a FACT, feel free to look it up, it would take less time than it did for you to respond to me. And if you think the Supreme Court definitions according to Cornell Law Library is bullshit you are exactly what I said, misguided. The People came to the conclusion that the "Official NIST report" was a conspiracy, not the other way around.
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja I would like to address this directly "There's a strong chance you have a high IQ or some mental disorder that makes you deeply sit and ponder things that are very simple to normal people, you then came to the conclusion that some kind of conspiracy is going on. "
#1-yes I have a rather high IQ in comparison to the average person. And your also correct in the assumption you made in regards to my health. I don't think like you, I can not. I think mathematically with out emotion
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja Meanwhile people like me are living life happily enjoying ourselves.
JM: The German people were happily enjoying themselves before all hell broke loose in WW2. Can't you see that? Millions around you are suffering.....but you are self centered to the death, apparently. By the time it affects you personally, nobody will be left to care.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
I hope this happens to all of USA. You fucking pieces of shit!
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
how the tower even remained standing after that i do not know. That is sad to see.
SumthinMstBAvailable 1 year ago
FUCK USA
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
@ihatekhomeini shut the fuck up you crazy muslim peace of shit. do as all a favor, blow yourself up, and go to hell earlier just like most of your pig fucker buddies do.
paintdataint 1 year ago
@paintdataint hehe, you fucking idiot. I'm not a muslim, I hate islam, it ruined my country with the help of USA. So shut the fuck up you ignorant fucking fat nigger.
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
@ihatekhomeini hahaha. you must be from one big shithole to think that. And fat nigger is probably the worst insult you could have said. that is the complete opposite of who i am. thanks for the laugh though.
paintdataint 1 year ago
@paintdataint You write like a retarted nigger, and you probably are one of those ashamed to be nigger niggers. At least my country is not filled with niggers, prostitutes, and hispapics.
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
@ihatekhomeini I write like a nigger? I am white as snow you ass. And hey! atleast my country isnt filled with a bunch of racist douche bags like yours. so shut the fuck up you bigot.
paintdataint 1 year ago
@paintdataint Haha, your country is not filled with racists, lol, your all a bunch of hillbilly redneck racists, except for you, little nigger.
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
@ihatekhomeini haha your comments are hilarious. KEEP IT UP!
paintdataint 1 year ago
@paintdataint thanx, yours are not.
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
@ihatekhomeini Your a troll. One of many that tries to take away from the facts being played on the screen. So now you'll go on the tracking software like the rest of them, tracked for all to see lol. Your an idiot and the people arguing with you are idiots. you've done nothing be instigate hate bred by stupidity since you wrote your acclaimed FUCK USA remark. Well done. Now that you know your being tracked you'll disappear right, like the others do?
The Israeli and US gov's are resp for this
squillyb7718 1 year ago
Comment removed
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
@paintdataint You fucking Americans created muslim fundamentalism, you destroyed my country by helping these fucking islamic shitheads, if only you could understand history you piece of shit. That's why I say fuck USA. If only the founding fathers where alive. Fucking piece of midwest ignorant fat fucking piece of shit. Go and pray to your capitalist god for more bail outs for wall street, so the poor can stay poor and rich get richer. You are a nigger right?
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
@ihatekhomeini i cant wait till i turn 18 so when i join the military, I can find your curry smelling ass and fly a plane into YOU and your family and post it over youtube. Then everyone can laugh at your death and say how much of a worthless piece of shit you are.
doomangel444 1 year ago
@doomangel444 good thing that shitpieces like you join the army, that way we get rid of you real fast! Go die for the rich kids in America!
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
@ihatekhomeini Whats good about your country? seriously, nobody cares about you. America is the greatest country in the world and I wouldn't want to live anywhere else. You can stay in your shithole.
DAROMSninja 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja if nobody cares about me why comment.
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
@ihatekhomeini Haha. Please. I'm just fed up with people from 3rd world countries crying out for attention on youtube by saying "fuck america" when they just wished they lived here.
DAROMSninja 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja I don't live in a third world country, and I wouldn't want to live in the US if you paid me. Now fuck off.
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja You are seriously misguided and need to do some history homework. America? You mean the United States Federal Corporation don't you? America, isn't a country its a continent. The United States is defined as a FEDERAL CORPORATION and I'm not yelling, legally it has to be in all caps. try using google "us not a country?" and see what you get lol. Please start there and then educate yourselves and your families. Keep that patriotism in your voice, were gonna need it!
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@DAROMSninja Here, let me help ALL of you!
Title 28 3002
§ 3002. Definitions
(13) “Security agreement” means an agreement that creates or provides for a lien.
(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States;
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@doomangel444 this bullshit rhetoric garbage is exactly what proves your ignorance and hate, just like the person you are arguing with.
"when a scholar is arguing with a fool, from a distance an observer might not not who is who."
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@squillyb7718 shut upppp no one was talking to you. Your obviously just one mistake your mom should of swallowed.
doomangel444 1 year ago
@doomangel444 of course the educated responder to the PUBLIC thread should shut up. That makes sense. Try saying something logical. And I am talking to you, calling you out on your bullshit and much like most of you uneducated hate mongers you have no tangible response. This crap you post belittles the focus of the OP's video. The FACT that there is a conspiracy by the US and Israeli governments to cover up the true events of 9-11. go to 9-11 timeline to find the truth
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@ihatekhomeini Obviously attacking this poster will get you banned, but not before we track your IP. You and the rest of the HATE TROLLS will be extinguished.
squillyb7718 1 year ago
@squillyb7718 hehe, good luck tracking my IP.
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
were the twin towers made out of chop sticks ???
omezi 1 year ago
Whoa...at like 1:19, did the plane go ALL THE WAY through the building?? I never even knew it went that far! I thought it just got lodged into the middle of the building!
CountryMusicCentral 1 year ago
I don't know guys, it just looks like an airplane flying into a building and blowing up. It doesn't really shed any new light on this for me at least.
reymatt76 1 year ago
At 3:40 , clear ufo
mrlustig 1 year ago
@mrlustig haha, go fuck yourself idiot =DDDD
enoosuomest 1 year ago
yep when you slow it down it looks like the plane hit the building on purpose .somebody hates america real bad.
datzfast 1 year ago
FUCK TERRORISTS!
HackaFlash 1 year ago
@HackaFlash Kill them!
gerrarditto4u 1 year ago
Occam's Razor.
Let's make the least number of assumptions possible. We can start by eliminating the one about how the United States government, who is wholly incapable of efficiently handling even the most rudimentary tasks, somehow plotted a vast conspiracy to kill its own people and managed to keep it a secret.
Seriously people ...
LuvStayn 1 year ago
@LoveStain your assuming it the visible government, supposed ti m m cveigh was going to b low up a building and he was willing to get some help. but why give him help, the outcome ended the m ilitia movement of 2.5 million ar med lunatics.
datzfast 1 year ago
Conspiracy theorists...
falubii 1 year ago
9/11 would have been a flawless production if: 1) The impact was more realistic 2) Stick to "blue" skies 3) WHY so many plane trajectories? 4) Layering techniques should be used sparingly 5) The plane "shape" should be consistent 6) Either black or white smoke, not both. 7) Draw in the top right corner of the WTC1, in the above video 8) Enough of the tilting horizons 9) Clue your early reporters in on whats happening. "NO missiles" 10) Sound effects must be consistent.
ProtectAus 1 year ago
@ProtectAus
The no plane theory would be taken seriously if:
1) It had any evidence to support it's claims
nobraintheory 1 year ago
genius!! i would have never thought to do anything to support our claims if i was on their side... you are much better at debating than i am...
s694019001 1 year ago
This 'ultra slow motion' garbage is funny too. The same amount of frames exist, so all this does is increase the time between them, and incorporate frame blending, which further erodes the resolution. Analyzing these videos (which the entire no plane movement is based on) is a joke. No one who knows anything about video would even pretend to do this.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
00:15
O_o
ODAL123 1 year ago
The guy that took this video is either a big liar or he knew that something was going to happen that's why he is crouching so low to take this shot or he is in a manhole also he didn't recorded no sound of the plane he is either plain stupid or someone cut the sound of tape!
thunderbolt2011 1 year ago
y not just slide down the buildings?
pandadust1 1 year ago
What happened to the top right corner of WTC1...??? Draw a straight line along the right face of WTC1 above the smoke. The building was square at time of collapse...???
ProtectAus 1 year ago
Hey no brains Why is the smoke WHITE, in the first 10 seconds of the above video, and in the following video the smoke is BLACK, yet the WTC is similarly overexposed in both videos...???
ProtectAus 2 years ago
"Why is the smoke WHITE, in the first 10 seconds of the above video, and in the following video the smoke is BLACK,"
Because the buildings were holograms and the machine was on the fritz. Why do you think?
nobraintheory 2 years ago
@nobraintheory "i will absolutely destroy you in a video debate. Bring it". Well destroy me and tell me why the smoke coming from WTC1 is white in one video and black in the other, even though the WTC is overexposed in both. And the color of smoke and flame from the WTC2 explosion is similar in both videos. And a clever analogy no brains, because on TV the WTC were effectively as real as your hologram.
ProtectAus 2 years ago
"Well destroy me and tell me why the smoke coming from WTC1 is white in one video and black in the other,"
Different cameras look drastically different, it's not all the same camera's exposure. Highlights, midtones, and darks , along with color, are all independent from each other. Some cameras have multiple sensors, etc.
"on TV the WTC were effectively as real as your hologram."
So, let me get this straight. You think the buildings, people, smoke, explosions, etc. were all fake?
nobraintheory 2 years ago
@nobraintheory The building is bright white in both videos The Flame is orange in both videos The smoke is white from 2nd impact in both videos The sky is blue in both videos But the smoke is black and white in both videos. And we are talking simple 2001 home video cameras here with 1 low resolution CCD. This event is captured simultaneously , with identical colours and highlights and darks for both cameras. Keep trying ProfessorNobrains,.
ProtectAus 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ProtectAus - I asked you one question, and you couldn't answer it. Why avoid questions?
Do you think the entire videos, (buildings, explosions, people, smoke) are fake?
"And we are talking simple 2001 home video cameras here with 1 low resolution CCD. "
How do you know, have you asked any of the authors?
nobraintheory 2 years ago
"The building is bright white in both videos"
Not exactly, look at the top of the towers. You can see the dark upper area in the second video, but not the first. The highlights are different. You can also see the area of smoke that's lit by the sun, and the area in shadow in both videos. It's just more pronounced because there is a great difference in the second.
How does any of this support no planes?
nobraintheory 2 years ago
The WTC is the same color as the smoke in video 1 and the WTC is not the same color as the smoke in the video 2, in fact the difference is from black to white. Fairbanks is underneath, seeing more dark shadow on the smoke therefore we should have less luminous exposure, and the angle of sun would mean less reflection from his lucky vantage. But from directly in front of the WTC with the sun behind us, giving maximum reflective radiant exposure, yet the smoke is black? Keep Trying NoBrains
ProtectAus 2 years ago
@ProtectAus - You must have missed my question for the second time:
DO YOU THINK THE ENTIRE VIDEO; PEOPLE, BUILDINGS, SMOKE, EXPLOSIONS, WAS FAKED?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
*****ATTENTION***** Don't let the Disinfo clowns lead you to the physical damage debate, for 8.5 years they can defend it very well. Discuss the VIDEO FAKERY only. They have NO answer for; 1) the different trajectories 2) the black/white smoke from different videos coming from WTC1 at exact time of 2nd impact. 3) Verrazano bridge, out of place and way too big and always moving even when the WTC display nil rotation.??? Don't worry about plane damage PUSH FAKERY
ProtectAus 2 years ago
@ProtectAus - "Don't worry about plane damage PUSH FAKERY"
If you weren't lying you wouldn't have to push anything. Investigators don't push, they just look at evidence. You people are like cult recruiters, looking for the least intelligent and most gullible.
nobraintheory 2 years ago
@nobraintheory We all know that video FAKERY is not a lie, thats why you come to these sites every day. There is 9/11 conspiracy sites with millions of hits, but here you are, why do you find this so important? And this video is about "Video FAKERY" so why don't you "comment" about it, instead of PUSHING your agenda. And if someone can find this page i don't consider them to be "the least intelligent and most gullible" that honor i leave for "nobraintheory" an appropriate name
ProtectAus 2 years ago
"We all know that video FAKERY is not a lie, thats why you come to these sites every day. "
And while I teach video production and motion graphics, you just guess and say things.
"There is 9/11 conspiracy sites with millions of hits, but here you are, why do you find this so important?"
It's fun.
"And this video is about "Video FAKERY" so why don't you "comment" about it, instead of PUSHING your agenda."
I will absolutely destroy you in a video debate. Bring it.
nobraintheory 2 years ago
@nobraintheory "i teach video production and CGI at a university, and I own a media company. I literally do this all day." How can you teach, mark papers, run a media company ALL day and still have time to troll the web for 10 hours a day, you must have excellent time management skills? And from your stupid emotional arguments about CGI, a debate would be a waste of my time. The EVIDENCE for TV FAKERY is overwhelming, Just face it.
ProtectAus 2 years ago
nobraintheory claims to teach at a university and run a media company, yet he posts no videos. I exposed another shill about two months ago. He claimed to be an airline pilot. After a few days, he admitted to being a high school student. The only planes he'd flown had been virtual. He was a fraud, parroting the "official story". I think this is also the case with nobraintheory.
lmfecher 2 years ago
"nobraintheory claims to teach at a university and run a media company, yet he posts no videos."
How do you know I've posted no videos. This account is specifically to laugh and make fun of you.
"I exposed another shill about two months ago."
Ohhhh, no! Don't expose me.
"I think this is also the case with nobraintheory. "
Wrong again. How about you talk about all this fake video evidence so I can embarrass you again. Speculating about me is just silly.
nobraintheory 2 years ago
"This account is specifically to laugh and make fun of you"....
This hardly sounds like a "hobby" that a respected university professor or media company owner would take up. It sounds more like what a high school student would post on Facebook. Face the facts Professor Nobrainer, you're nothing but a shill and a fraud. And a lame one, at that.
lmfecher 2 years ago
@lmfecher - "This hardly sounds like a "hobby" that a respected university professor or media company owner would take up."
Well it is.
"Face the facts Professor Nobrainer, you're nothing but a shill and a fraud."
Then the rest of the world is as well, because NOBODY believes no planes. Even other twoofers think your theory is embarrassing.
All of this speculation about me is pointless, and it does nothing to support the no plane theory.
nobraintheory 2 years ago
LMAO! Professor Nobrainer, besides trolling youtube to "laugh and make fun of you", you also a liar. You said NOBODY believes no planes, really? According to you, I'm the only person on this planet that knows no planes were used as weapons on 9/11. That's a lie.
FACT: A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity.
FACT: An aluminum, hollow airliner cannot penetrate and fly through a steel framed/concrete building.
No planes were used on 9/11.
lmfecher 2 years ago 2
@lmfecher - "Professor Nobrainer, besides trolling youtube..."
Still concentrating on me instead of proving your points?
"FACT: A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity."
I'll bet you one thousand dollars if I point an airliner straight down and gas it, it will be going faster than 500mph when it hits the ground.
"FACT: An aluminum, hollow airliner cannot penetrate and fly through a steel framed/concrete building. "
Show your math. I say it can.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nobraintheory
"I'll bet you one thousand dollars if I point an airliner straight down and gas it, it will be going faster than 500mph when it hits the ground".
May I remind you, Professor Nobrainer, that the "aircraft" in question, UAL 175, was flying straight and level when it supposedly hit WTC 2.
FACT: A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity.
Try again.
lmfecher 1 year ago 2
@lmfecher lol you are a fucking idiot. go to college and take some engineering classes or classes on statics...everything you said is wrong and you are discrediting intelligent people who actually know what they are talking about. how do you think a piece of straw could penetrate a wooden barn dumbass? with a high enough velocity, any structure can be compromised, the plane could easily puncture and damage a few columns but to have the whole buildling explode in 10 seconds...that cant happen!
snillocekim 1 year ago
@snillocekim
I am a former aircraft mechanic and Gulf War vet. I was trained by the United States Navy in Newtonian Laws and Mechanics and Crash Physics. And I have a Bachelor of Science degree. "how do you think a piece of straw could penetrate a wooden barn dumbass?"...
You're comparing wood and steel, why?
The fact is a 767 cannot fly at 500mph at 800ft. Air density and structural integrity prohibit that speed at sea level. Aluminum cannot slice through steel, period.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher lol, have you ever been in a hurricane? when a piece of straw goes 300+ miles per hour, the kinetic energy it has allows it to puncture even thin sheet metal..open your eyes, yeah the plane was 2 mm thick AL and it was going around 450 mph, thats a fact, and yes, the turbines and the airplane shell impacted the front of the building and buckled about 40 2-inch columns...thats not hard at all. what IS impossible is for the 3 floors of fire to somehow buckle and destroy 80 floors...
snillocekim 1 year ago
@snillocekim
I have NEVER heard of straw penetrating steel. Wood, yes. Steel, no. Please provide an example of this. As far as kinetic energy goes, I'm glad you brought that up. Here's the answer. In the case of the anomalous entry of flight 175 into WTC 2, you are saying that the force of the 767 allowed it to enter the building. But, you are forgetting about acceleration.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@snillocekim
In this case, the acceleration part of Force equals Mass times Acceleration is really negative, that is, it is opposed to the speed of the 767, meaning the plane must decelerate as it makes contact with the building to release any energy.
When the 767 hit the building its mass must decelerate to equal the force applied to the building. But it doesn't decelerate; it just melds into the building, meaning that no force is applied.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher "But it doesn't decelerate; it just melds into the building, meaning that no force is applied. "
In reality the plane does decelerate, which if you were interested you could easily prove with a motion track. But you won't do this, because it contradicts your theory and proves you wrong.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
You're the cgi expert and media owner, right? Then make a video showing the IMPACT of UAL 175. Show me where the aircraft actually HITS the tower. I mean, you're a professor, right? Then why not assign this task to your students?
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher
"You're the cgi expert and media owner, right?"
Yep.
"Then make a video showing the IMPACT of UAL 175. Show me where the aircraft actually HITS the tower."
There are already 50 videos, if you can't see the impact in any of them, I can't help you. Hint - It hits where the explosion is, and the giant plane shape hole is made.
"Then why not assign this task to your students?"
Haha. Because they have better things to do than explain reality to someone who doesn't understand it.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
"Hint - It hits where the explosion is, and the giant plane shape hole is made".
Had this been a real commerical airliner, the explosion would have occurred on IMPACT, not INSIDE the building.
Everytime you comment, it becomes more apparent that you are NOT a cgi expert or a professor. Rather, you're a poser and a fraud.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher
"Everytime you comment, it becomes more apparent that you are NOT a cgi expert or a professor. Rather, you're a poser and a fraud."
Then bet me one thousand dollars like I offered, and I will shut you up. Take the bet you lying pussy coward.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
Bet you a thousand dollars for what? The obvious, that you're a poser and a fraud?
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher - You said "it becomes more apparent that you are NOT a cgi expert or a professor."
I will bet you one thousand dollars I am, and I even own a media company. I have tax returns, references, clients, etc. Bet me.
You on the other hand don't even pretend to have any knowledge of video production or CGI, but you run off at the mouth like you know what you're talking about. You're a retired mechanic. You know NOTHING about video, and it's obvious by your moronic beliefs.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
Ah, but I do know about Newtonian laws and basic crash physics. The videos were faked. No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lmfecher
"Ah, but I do know about Newtonian laws and basic crash physics. The videos were faked."
But you won't post the math to support your words, so once again your comment is useless. If you say the crash was physically impossible, it's up to you to support your statement with physics. Without your math, it's just words on a page.
Decide on the bet yet?
"No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11. "
More useless words. All the evidence contradicts your statement.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@lmfecher - Are you on disability/retirement from the same government you claim is behind the attacks?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
Why do you insist on changing the subject whenever you've painted yourself into a corner? Only posers and frauds do this. If you are indeed a media owner, professor and cgi expert, then you should be able to create and post your own debunking videos. Why then is your channel so empty? All you have done is parrot the official story. I say again, you are a poser and a fraud.
lmfecher 1 year ago
How did I paint myself into a corner? You said you've proven something is physically impossible, but you won't post the math. Why?
"then you should be able to create and post your own debunking videos."
What should I put in them? There are almost 50 videos that show planes and it means nothing to you.
"Why then is your channel so empty?"
Because I don't owe you anything.
"I say again, you are a poser and a fraud. "
Then take the bet, and I'll prove you wrong.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
And in all of the videos of "planes" hitting the towers, NONE of them show IMPACT. Show me a video where the airliner actually HITS the tower. Many of them show the airliner PENETRATING the tower face, exploding INSIDE the tower, and then flying THROUGH the opposite side of the tower. Please tell me Professor Nobrainer, how could the fragile nose cone exit the other side of WTC 2 intact?
lmfecher 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lmfecher
"NONE of them show IMPACT."
Yes, stupid, they do. They all show a giant explosion and a cloud of debris. You just lie over and over and say they don't. It's pathetic. Try watching one that's not in 'ultra slow motion.' IF THERE WAS NO IMPACT, WHAT PUSHED THE COLUMNS INWARD INSIDE THE PLANE HOLE?
"how could the fragile nose cone exit.. "
It didn't. No one thinks it did but Simon Shack and the people stupid enough to believe him.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lmfecher - I'll ask again, are you on disability/retirement from the same government you claim is behind the attacks? I'll bet you are.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lmfecher
"Ah, but I do know about Newtonian laws and basic crash physics."
Any progress on posting those equations?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@lmfecher - More proof of deceleration.
/watch?v=GIZO-zY3Cug
You know what doesn't decelerate? Holograms and CGI planes.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
I watched the video and it shows exactly the same magic act that was performed on 9/11, a commerical airliner flying through a steel framed/reinforced concrete building without IMPACTING the building FIRST!! Deceleration means "slowing down". Your "proof of deceleration" video confirms what I've been saying all along, no commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11. Do you know what really decelerates? A REAL plane hitting a building. It's called crash physics.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher -
"Deceleration means "slowing down".
Uh... yeah. And it does. You can't argue with this, it's a fact.
"Do you know what really decelerates?"
The plane in this video.
"It's called crash physics. "
Something you like to talk about, but you still refuse to post any math supporting your ignorant, empty words. Why. Because you have done no math, you're just guessing.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
You keep bringing up math. Ok, let's do the math. 2+2=4 all day long. But a hollow, aluminum airliner cannot penetrate and fly through a steel framed/reinforced concrete tower, with its nose cone INTACT, ever. The airliner DOES NOT slow down, nor does it IMPACT the tower. No commerical airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher "with its nose cone INTACT"
The nosecone didn't stay intact. If you listened to anyone other than Simon Shack you would know that.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nobraintheory
"The nosecone didn't stay intact. If you listened to anyone other than Simon Shack you would know that"..
Not only do I think for myself, I do my own research and arrive at my own conclusions. There are many videos from mainstream media that clearly show the nosecone fully intact as it exits WTC 2, clearly violating Newtonian laws and basic crash physics. Therefore, no commerical airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher
"There are many videos from mainstream media that clearly show the nosecone fully intact"
Nope, another lie.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
Another lie? Have you actually LOOKED at all the videos that show the nosecone exit the opposite side of WTC 2? Here's one of many...watch?v=9cvWwIxMbmE
According to you, the airliner was able to penetrate TWO steel framed/reinforced concrete walls, exiting with it's nosecone intact. Impossible. No commerical airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 1 year ago
"According to you, the airliner was able to penetrate TWO steel framed/reinforced concrete walls"
That's absolutely not correct, I never said that. I've said over and over that's not the nose. Don't pause the video, watch. Where does the 'nose' go? Does it disappear?
You keep acting like you misunderstand, but you know full well what we're talking about.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
If it's not the nosecone we see starting at 1:09 in this video, what is it?
lmfecher 1 year ago
"If it's not the nosecone we see starting at 1:09 in this video, what is it?"
Plane parts that shot out of the building and were found. Of course, you must think they were fired out of a cannon after the explosives carved a plane shaped hole in the building, when the hologram hit.
Why would the nose cone just disappear?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
Why do you insist on using the hologram thing? Clearly a tactic a fraud would use. I'll ask again, at 1:09 in this video, the nosecone exits out the other side of the tower intact. How is this possible?
lmfecher 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lmfecher
"Why do you insist on using the hologram thing?"
Because there is no other explanation for the live tv footage and eyewitnesses who saw a plane. Do you have one?
"the nosecone exits out the other side of the tower intact. How is this possible? "
I've answered this now about 50 times to you personally. Read this carefully: IT'S NOT THE NOSECONE. IT'S THE ENGINE AND LANDING GEAR, WHICH WAS FOUND.
If the plane was CGI why would they animate the nose exiting?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@lmfecher The nose cone is called the "radome" because it houses the weather radar. It is made of fibrglass and it disintegrated on impact. I guarantee it. The ONLY things that survived the impact were the 8,000 pound solid steel engine cores, the solid steel high-strength landing gear, and possibly the auxilary power unit in the tail of the plane. Very little else would have survived. Anything made of densely packed steel on the plane would have survived. The aluminum vaporised on impact.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
@JetMechMA
"The nose cone is called the "radome"...
I know what it's called, I worked on military aircraft for six years. Show me ANY video of UAL 175 actually CRASHING into WTC 2. There was no deceleration OR impact because no commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11. Even the wingtips sliced right through steel beams...impossible.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher You're preaching to the choir friend. But you are wrong about the implosion theory. Sept 11th happened just as we saw it that day live....but the hijackers were patsy terrorists working for traitors within the CIA and the PNAC cabal who occupied the White House at the time. Again, you are right but you are wrong. The devil is in the details man.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
@JetMechMA
There were no hijackers because there were NO PLANES. Again, show me a video where UAL 175 actually CRASHES into WTC 2.
FACT: A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity.
FACT: A 767 cannot penetrate a steel framed tower wall, slice through steel core columns, explode, and then penetrate and exit out another steel framed wall with its nosecone intact.
No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lmfecher: and then penetrate and exit out another steel framed wall with its nosecone intact.
JM: You are delusional. What is seen exiting the opposite wall of the tower are the two engine cores and some other high strength steel components. The super tough and exotic high strength alloy core of the engines becomes a giant FSDS tank round. A fin stabilized, disgarding sabot, anti-tank round....a penetrator.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
Comment removed
lmfecher 1 year ago
@JetMechMA
"The ONLY things that survived the impact were the 8,000 pound solid steel engine cores, the solid steel high-strength landing gear, and possibly the auxilary power unit in the tail of the plane"...
Really? These are the components that survived? Where are they? The engine found on Murray Street isn't a powerplant for a 767 nor is it an APU. And the wheel section found isn't from a 767 either. So where exactly ARE these components you speak of?
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher After the investigation they belonged to American and United Airlines.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
@JetMechMA
"After the investigation"? LMFAO! Who's investigation? The same people who omitted WTC 7 from the "official story"? Again, the engine found on Murray Street does not belong to a 767, nor does the landing gear found. Airliners cannot fly that fast at that altitude and an aluminum, hollow tube cannot pass through steel without an IMPACT. NO commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher "Who's investigation?"
JM: I'm not debating that. I was just saying that any airplane parts that existed belonged to the companies that owned the planes....that's all I meant. " the engine found on Murray Street does not belong to a 767" Did you personally examine it? You arer obsessed with a LIE. What you are doing is hurting the truth movement. You should know to...lead, follow, or get out of the way.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
@lmfecher "Who's investigation?"
JM: I'm not debating that. I was just saying that any airplane parts that existed belonged to the companies that owned the planes....that's all I meant. " the engine found on Murray Street does not belong to a 767" Did you personally examine it? You are obsessed with a LIE. What you are doing is hurting the truth movement. How do you explain that every engineer in the world watched it yet doesn't believe in implosion. You won't answer this question.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
@JetMechMA
You call yourself a jet mech? The engine found on Murray Street was identified as a CFM56 engine. If you were any kind of mech, you'd know that engine type does not belong on a 767, it belongs on a 737. Any you're lying when you state that "every engineer in the world watched it, yet doesn't believe in implosion", ever heard of Richard Gage, for example?
No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher: The engine found on Murray Street was identified as a CFM56 engine.
JM: Post the source of that. I've never seen anything saying it was a CFM.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
@JetMechMA
Hey slacker, if I found the source, I'll bet you could, too. You do know how to use your computer for something other than video games and porn, don't you? Here's a hint...go to google and type in "CFM56 found on Murray Street", or is that too hard for you to do, Skippy?
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher If the perpetrators went to that much trouble, don't you think they would have planted the right engine debris?
JetMechMA 1 year ago
@JetMechMA
"If the perpetrators went to that much trouble, don't you think they would have planted the right engine debris"?
Why should they? Americans are stupid enough to believe that what they hear and see on television is the gospel truth. Americans don't read, don't research, and they don't think for themselves, so why bother planting the correct aircraft parts? All they have to do is propose a threat, real or imagined and the fearful sheeple will do anything to be protected.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@nobraintheory
The video on this page clearly shows the nosecone exiting the opposite side of WTC 2 starting at 1:09. Just another example of MANY videos showing the same thing. You're a fraud, a shill and a coward. No commerical airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 1 year ago