I found one more reason for "gravity" with out drawing force. This particle who moving now far and coming to here and finally moving to centre of earth, getting closer eachother and thats why this particle are more density together, when this particle moving closer earth. Two times closer after half way to here and two times closer after half way here etc.
Do you understund expanding space? If, lets told for us, how space expanding?
Did you know, nobody ever proof, space expanding. So, you can BELIEVE, space expanding, but you cant ever proof with science experiement, space expanding. You can BELIEVE, there is god or expanding space. Expanding space is not science! It is religion!
Science can't prove anything. That isn't how science works. Science cannot prove things are true, it simply disproves alternatives. If, as you so incoherently argue, the conventional view is based only on widespread belief, what is your idea based on, other than the belief of a crackpot, moronic dullard?
In conclusion, the only thing that isn't expanding is your knowledge of physics (or grammar, for that matter). You suck and dont understund science (sic). Sadly, I can't "PROOF" I am right.
You post to can do some science test / experiments what you can make again.
Wll, with quaks and particle you can make a science test / expierements what you can do again, but with space you cant make any science test / expierements!
So, if you say, space expanding, it is religion!
it is not science and if you cant understund that, i cant help you!
Atomic nuclei recycle all the time of each other's energy! Also of the energy which is the kernel/nucleus between the moving particle radiates. Was sufficient for particles radiating energy recycling of atoms in kernel/nuclei-energy?
Perhaps the atoms in the kernel/nucleus does not need to be much more/infinity energy?
I am just wondering how you explain some phenomenon with out gravity like gravitationally bound objects at great distances. Lets just suppose for a second that you are right this would explain very close objects not ones found many many miles away so is their a new force we must be introduced to?
This is such crap.... How could u ever TRY to explain something based on the sun's age given that it's age was calculated using exactly the sort of physics you deny? This is ludicrous!
That is not science, that resembles the experiments and theories I used to come up with when I was like.. 12 or 13... total lack of basic knowledge AND good sense.
Drop it right now cuz this is getting u nowhere. This is even worse than those conspiracy theories.. those have a bit of plausability... THIS DOESN'T!
Today's theories additional gum space dimensions, to be expanding and arching space, theories of the dark substance and energy are not in the right. They are in the total incorrect. No space expands simsalapim macig way. Also child understands that for example Energy of atomic bomb expands of bomb in other words energy of bomb changes less for the dense. Just can some supporter of the initial explosion theory tells how space expands? Can't! So, energy inside atoms nucleus expanding all a time!
It's kindda hard to understand your comebacks especially with the use of a computer translator... The sun is pretty dynamic and it works basically like all stars, it's burning hydrogen and forming helium and the only reason it does so is because it has enough big a mass that fusion occurs thus liberating energy. When Einstein and others first came up with his ideas regarding atomic level physics, people automatically linked them to how things actually behave in our level. Your theory is off.
Read a bit about doppler effect, redshift and blue shift. This can be used to detect if stars are distancing themselves from us... and it turns out most of the galaxies are distancing from ours. I'm not saying the newest theories about dark matter are "dead on"... that has yet to be seen about... I'm saying your theory is off because it sort of discards electricity... I know you will not understand what I just wrote... Just... read a bit. Your theory is creative, I give you that, but wrong
I read enough to know u never proved anything u developed. U never tested anything. I'm sorry but I have to ask: Are you familiar with the scientific method?
The bottom line is: Anyone Schizophrenic enough could come up with new theoretical explanations for how the universe works. It doesn't mean it would be accepted mathematically. Your theory is so parallel and so unsupported factually that it will certainly be ignored by the scientific community. Don't be sad about that.
Besides, the way the text is written in english only makes me realize you DO have a model in your head and u do "feel" this model is right! This is easy to believe in. The only problem here is science is not science fiction. There are lots of "we can observe" parts that are just observed IN YOUR BRAIN... Seriously... if u come up with stuff like that and want anyone "scientifically ready" enough to be impressed by your theories, u gotta come with ALL the numbers.
I dont have a theory! I just have a idea with out numbers. i jus looking people who like to come meking new and right physics with me. If you BELIEVE extra dimensions, it is OK for me. I dont BELIEVE any magic dimensions. I dont believe that space expanding, because i already KNOW that atoms nucleus can expanding and i have a already some phenomena who prove that. Sorry about that. but yours physics it is wrong physics!
It's not a theory.. not even a thesis.. And exactly for that reason u can't KNOW anything. all u do is you BELIEVE in this stuff u made up out of drugs, or too much free time. I don't REALLY KNOW anything about any physics at all. If you're talking about the "curled up people experiment" please explain it to me cuzit sounds like choreographic dancing to say the most. No physicist is gonna wanna waste his time on this. It's not disturbing enough for them. U gotta have other projects!Pseudoscience
I don't know if you see what you're doing, but you're killing off ALL the physics known to man to be replaced by some imagination u came up with and now u say out loud that you KNOW that atoms and everything else are EXPANDING.. becoming bigger as time passes... without a single piece of evidence? uhhmm... That's very humble and not a long shot... Instead of doing that why don't u look for a psychologist and realize who superprotected you? You aren't right all the time, you know that?espcly now.
I have a evidence for expanding atoms more that you have any evidense for expanding space or extra dimensions! You cant even told how space expanding. I can show you how sun chancing all a time not so density energy. So, also atoms nucleus can chancing same way not so density energy. Sorry about that, but thats the way it is! Or if you can told how space expanding, lets told that for me
Oh wow! You have proved it! I believe you and from now on, to me, pressure caused by the difference of energy densities along the size scale levels is what makes the universe work! I feel lucky because I can understand the world better now. Thank you.
Now for you and on your familiar are historical opportunity comes with to make history! Comes with to upset our world picture! Finally we have key physics, to all theory. Got acquainted with onesimpleprinciple com to the sides thought and be unprejudiced! Make own Etimespace your video and tells in those own I said how macrocosm seriously functioned onesimpleprinciple according to the thought ! Thanks to you! Send this message forward and get involved in!
get aquainted with the electric universe theory & you can do away with the unscientific onesimpleprinciple concept & learn how stars, galaxies & the universe really work.
How you expalin gravity? i already know, there is no any force who drawing anything! So, how that electric theory expalin, why we stay down earth skin?
A simple question for you.If the pressure is from space holding us,then it must be constant?& must be uniform?& must apply pressure evenly wherever you are?How can it be less on some planets & more on others?The force pushing has to be even,there is no mechanism that allows this energy to get stronger in areas & weaker in others.Your hypothesis fails,Sorry its not science & can easily be debunked.Gravity is real,it is a weak electrostacic attraction at the atomic level which compounds with mass.
Why sun energy changing all a time to not not so density energy? 5 billion years ago sun energy was much smaller area in space who dont expanding! Now that energy maked 10 billion lightyears splitter energyball! Why? because all energyconcentration expanding all a time. Also atoms nucleus expanding all a time. Also photons, electrons and neutrinos expanding all a time and they opening expanding energy all a time! Sorry, but thats the way it is!
Reads few book about that how from Heliocentric model was resisted and how foolish claims Galilei Galileo should bump, before Heliocentric model started to move foolish from Country middle model to the litter basket
Galileo met resistance from the church, who wasn't going to let some scientist with a telescope upset their grand scheme. Now, we have the information superhighway, aka the internet. Free thinkers can not be silenced, nor bullied. However, i consider you a free thinker and i want to silence your illogical bullshit :D
What lab or evidence do you have to back every single outrageous claim up?
Convince people in Finland you are right, then they will hire a translator for the rest of us.
You cant prove any way how space expanding or how space curving. Well. space dont expanding or doing anything!
I can prove that energy can change not so density energy.
Like sun doing all a time or like earth doing all a time or like you doing all a time.
5 miljards years ago sun energy was much smaller area what that energy it is now. Now this energy maked 10 miljards lightyears diameter energyball. So, sun changing all a time for not so density energy. It happens for atoms nucleus too
All the phenomens can be explained by one force and this force is the pressure. (Don´t forget the power of thought! You also can move yourself by the power of thought! Quite right. You get yourself to move with the help of the muscles .
You so you send message of your brains to your muscles and you get yourself to move?
What is power/force of this thought, which get you to move there where you want?).
We can describe by people what happens in the atomcores all the time. For example one thousand people can go to the space and curl up close to each other. Now we have made an energyconsentration of people that covers a
certain spot of the space. We know that the biggest part of the atoms is empty space. Also between people there exists empty space that does not expand or curve.
These people can begin to straighten or in other words to open up and this way they push themselves away from each other. One can observe the hardest pressure in the middle of this human energyconsentration and people who locate in the middle must do an enormeous job so that they woun´t flatten in the centre. These people in the centre sweat the most. This is excactly the same thing that happens without gravitation for example in the centre of the earth and in the centre of the sun.
The density of the human energyconsentration reduces and the people push themselves away from the centre of the human energyconsentration. Now for a little while we can observe a phenomen of gravitation without a drawing force (that actually does not exist) on the surface of the human
energyconsentration.
In my opinion the space does not expand or curve. If it would expand, could you describe how does the space expand?
It is easy to describe how the energy all the time turns into a less dense energy in the atomcores, so I think that it is time to forget all about the magical expanding and curving of the space. You can also forget all the spare spacedimentions, the dark substance and the dark energy.
So the space does not expand or curve!
The atomcores expand and open up expanding electrons and expanding photons and they beam their expanding energy as waves away from themselves.
You look at the galax, you can understand that the energy inside the galaxy is denser than outside the galaxy. If you look at a star, you can understand that energy inside the star is denser than outside the star. You will know for sure that the energy inside the atomcore is denser than outside the atomcore. It is not difficult to understand that the energy inside the protons is denser than outside of them and the energy inside the quarks is denser than outside the quarks and so on...
That three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentration that bems energywaves with the nature of the galaxies, is formed also from separate three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentrations ect. And so the smaller separate energyconsentrations we talk about, the denser and denser the energy is all the time.
So the atomcore does not have a centre point, where the energy would be denser than outside it. There is no centre point also at the universe, outside which the energy would be less denser. Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away
from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe.
Wow, now any moron with a mouse can spout complete bullshit and pretend it's something like science. If this twat's ideas had any feasibility he'd be collecting his nobel prize. Sadly, he has completely misunderstood every science lesson he ever attended, but has the overwhelming arrogance to assume he is somehow smarter than Newton and Einstein.
Why you dont have theory for everything? Because you have a wrong physics. You cant even see space, but still you say, space expanding. No way. Lets take a thoausands people and make a people energyconcentration. All people going very near eachother and after that they start to opening and pushing themselfs far a way. Now middle of people energyconcentration have a pressure and people energyconcentration is not so density. Lets told me how space expanding? No, space dont expanding!
We can see the Sun, because the energy from the Sun comes towards us.
But, the energy that comes from the Sun towards us is its own energy. It is the one and same energy which the Sun consist of.
Here with us it just is less thickly than what it was "inside" the Sun. I wrote inside with the apostrophes, because now we can ask how big the Sun seriously is?
When the Sun caught fire, the energy has already openned forth from that area.
At the time when the Sun started to radiate light, It filled the certain amount of the space.
Nowadays that energy of the Sun fills in the space much larger area and the Sun has changed for the less densed energy, in the space which does not expand or arch.
If Sun is 5 billion years old, then the diameter of the ball forming from the energy of the Sun is 10 billion light years.
Quite a big Sun.
Much larger than five billion years ago.
In other words the energy of Sun has simply expanded or exploded or openned for much less densed energy as it was before, in the space which does not expand or arch.
The mortal atoms are the photons removing from the Sun. They explode and release energy waves, which have the nature of electrons and photons.
The surface of the mortals planet has opened from Sun five billion years ago. To this surface it can dig holes or walk on it.
For the mortal the Planet and its surface seems to be as big as always. It can stay on the surface, because the surface of the planet removes with increasing speed away from the Sun.
Not to mention that there is not enough "energy from space" to even stop this atomic expansion, even if we assumed it occurred. The energy provided from photons from space is not dense enough to do much at all on the atomic scale, let alone negate some sort of imaginary repulsion.
This violates everything we know about atomic physics. Atoms don't "expand" because all objects tend towards a ground state of energy, and this means that the atom takes on the smallest radius it can. Increasing radius means that either the energy state is excited, in which case this is not stable and will decay naturally OR the natural radius has increased, in which case, simple differential equations with exponentials demonstrate this cannot be the case.
I found one more reason for "gravity" with out drawing force. This particle who moving now far and coming to here and finally moving to centre of earth, getting closer eachother and thats why this particle are more density together, when this particle moving closer earth. Two times closer after half way to here and two times closer after half way here etc.
Etimespace 2 years ago
Do you understund expanding space? If, lets told for us, how space expanding?
Did you know, nobody ever proof, space expanding. So, you can BELIEVE, space expanding, but you cant ever proof with science experiement, space expanding. You can BELIEVE, there is god or expanding space. Expanding space is not science! It is religion!
.
Etimespace 2 years ago
Science can't prove anything. That isn't how science works. Science cannot prove things are true, it simply disproves alternatives. If, as you so incoherently argue, the conventional view is based only on widespread belief, what is your idea based on, other than the belief of a crackpot, moronic dullard?
In conclusion, the only thing that isn't expanding is your knowledge of physics (or grammar, for that matter). You suck and dont understund science (sic). Sadly, I can't "PROOF" I am right.
PurpleBlu3s 2 years ago
You post to can do some science test / experiments what you can make again.
Wll, with quaks and particle you can make a science test / expierements what you can do again, but with space you cant make any science test / expierements!
So, if you say, space expanding, it is religion!
it is not science and if you cant understund that, i cant help you!
.
Etimespace 2 years ago
More very important information onesimpleprinciple com pages forum.
Lets google,
Scoop from Savo, onesimpleprinciple
.
Etimespace 2 years ago
Wrong. That's all I have to say.
DarksideNeverAgain 2 years ago
Atomic nuclei recycle all the time of each other's energy! Also of the energy which is the kernel/nucleus between the moving particle radiates. Was sufficient for particles radiating energy recycling of atoms in kernel/nuclei-energy?
Perhaps the atoms in the kernel/nucleus does not need to be much more/infinity energy?
Etimespace 2 years ago
Check out
Explaination of the OneSimplePrinciple Model
video
More From: gadzometer
Etimespace 2 years ago
I expalain everything with change of pressure. Density of energy changes.
Space dont expanding!
Etimespace 2 years ago
I am just wondering how you explain some phenomenon with out gravity like gravitationally bound objects at great distances. Lets just suppose for a second that you are right this would explain very close objects not ones found many many miles away so is their a new force we must be introduced to?
bobbysnobby 2 years ago
How space expanding?
How space can expanding?
Where space is?
Is space some other space who dont changes?
Etimespace 2 years ago
just wonder why you dont have a theory of everything?
Are you sire, you have a right model of/an atom?
Big bang theory proofs, all energy was very density 13,7 billion years ago?
Today this same energy it is not so density?
We already know, nucleus of atoms is only energy?
How this energy can keep "himselfs" same density?
What it is this force?
How that force working?
Etimespace 2 years ago
Video name it is
Himalaya mountains
Jukteri
Etimespace 2 years ago
There is only energy and space. Density of energy changing in space who dont change at all.
Check out physorg com news
Huge undersea mountain found off Indonesia: scientists
i profetian, that mountain getting bigger "fast".
check out also my video
How mountain born
Etimespace 2 years ago
When the time comes, the first 100 Etimespace friends to celebrate the birth of the universe.
Since the universe is still, to the universe's birth to celebrate every day.
Celebrations held in Kuopio, and they obviously do not pay anything celebrant!
If the idea of the work and it brings the idea of the big developer money, paid to the first 100 Subscriber also travel to Kuopio!
So make sure your invitation to an all-time historical celebrations!
Savor
Etimespace 3 years ago
This is such crap.... How could u ever TRY to explain something based on the sun's age given that it's age was calculated using exactly the sort of physics you deny? This is ludicrous!
That is not science, that resembles the experiments and theories I used to come up with when I was like.. 12 or 13... total lack of basic knowledge AND good sense.
Drop it right now cuz this is getting u nowhere. This is even worse than those conspiracy theories.. those have a bit of plausability... THIS DOESN'T!
breeknow 3 years ago
Today's theories additional gum space dimensions, to be expanding and arching space, theories of the dark substance and energy are not in the right. They are in the total incorrect. No space expands simsalapim macig way. Also child understands that for example Energy of atomic bomb expands of bomb in other words energy of bomb changes less for the dense. Just can some supporter of the initial explosion theory tells how space expands? Can't! So, energy inside atoms nucleus expanding all a time!
Etimespace 3 years ago
It's kindda hard to understand your comebacks especially with the use of a computer translator... The sun is pretty dynamic and it works basically like all stars, it's burning hydrogen and forming helium and the only reason it does so is because it has enough big a mass that fusion occurs thus liberating energy. When Einstein and others first came up with his ideas regarding atomic level physics, people automatically linked them to how things actually behave in our level. Your theory is off.
breeknow 3 years ago
Read a bit about doppler effect, redshift and blue shift. This can be used to detect if stars are distancing themselves from us... and it turns out most of the galaxies are distancing from ours. I'm not saying the newest theories about dark matter are "dead on"... that has yet to be seen about... I'm saying your theory is off because it sort of discards electricity... I know you will not understand what I just wrote... Just... read a bit. Your theory is creative, I give you that, but wrong
breeknow 3 years ago
I already read about that. I just wonder, did you already read my text at all?
onesimpleprinciple com
I can explain redshifting ( no doppler) with out expanding space
Etimespace 3 years ago
I read enough to know u never proved anything u developed. U never tested anything. I'm sorry but I have to ask: Are you familiar with the scientific method?
The bottom line is: Anyone Schizophrenic enough could come up with new theoretical explanations for how the universe works. It doesn't mean it would be accepted mathematically. Your theory is so parallel and so unsupported factually that it will certainly be ignored by the scientific community. Don't be sad about that.
breeknow 3 years ago 3
Besides, the way the text is written in english only makes me realize you DO have a model in your head and u do "feel" this model is right! This is easy to believe in. The only problem here is science is not science fiction. There are lots of "we can observe" parts that are just observed IN YOUR BRAIN... Seriously... if u come up with stuff like that and want anyone "scientifically ready" enough to be impressed by your theories, u gotta come with ALL the numbers.
breeknow 3 years ago
I dont have a theory! I just have a idea with out numbers. i jus looking people who like to come meking new and right physics with me. If you BELIEVE extra dimensions, it is OK for me. I dont BELIEVE any magic dimensions. I dont believe that space expanding, because i already KNOW that atoms nucleus can expanding and i have a already some phenomena who prove that. Sorry about that. but yours physics it is wrong physics!
Etimespace 3 years ago
It's not a theory.. not even a thesis.. And exactly for that reason u can't KNOW anything. all u do is you BELIEVE in this stuff u made up out of drugs, or too much free time. I don't REALLY KNOW anything about any physics at all. If you're talking about the "curled up people experiment" please explain it to me cuzit sounds like choreographic dancing to say the most. No physicist is gonna wanna waste his time on this. It's not disturbing enough for them. U gotta have other projects!Pseudoscience
breeknow 3 years ago
I don't know if you see what you're doing, but you're killing off ALL the physics known to man to be replaced by some imagination u came up with and now u say out loud that you KNOW that atoms and everything else are EXPANDING.. becoming bigger as time passes... without a single piece of evidence? uhhmm... That's very humble and not a long shot... Instead of doing that why don't u look for a psychologist and realize who superprotected you? You aren't right all the time, you know that?espcly now.
breeknow 3 years ago
I have a evidence for expanding atoms more that you have any evidense for expanding space or extra dimensions! You cant even told how space expanding. I can show you how sun chancing all a time not so density energy. So, also atoms nucleus can chancing same way not so density energy. Sorry about that, but thats the way it is! Or if you can told how space expanding, lets told that for me
Etimespace 3 years ago
Oh wow! You have proved it! I believe you and from now on, to me, pressure caused by the difference of energy densities along the size scale levels is what makes the universe work! I feel lucky because I can understand the world better now. Thank you.
breeknow 3 years ago
Now for you and on your familiar are historical opportunity comes with to make history! Comes with to upset our world picture! Finally we have key physics, to all theory. Got acquainted with onesimpleprinciple com to the sides thought and be unprejudiced! Make own Etimespace your video and tells in those own I said how macrocosm seriously functioned onesimpleprinciple according to the thought ! Thanks to you! Send this message forward and get involved in!
Etimespace 3 years ago
get aquainted with the electric universe theory & you can do away with the unscientific onesimpleprinciple concept & learn how stars, galaxies & the universe really work.
rubberdown1969 3 years ago
How you expalin gravity? i already know, there is no any force who drawing anything! So, how that electric theory expalin, why we stay down earth skin?
Etimespace 3 years ago
A simple question for you.If the pressure is from space holding us,then it must be constant?& must be uniform?& must apply pressure evenly wherever you are?How can it be less on some planets & more on others?The force pushing has to be even,there is no mechanism that allows this energy to get stronger in areas & weaker in others.Your hypothesis fails,Sorry its not science & can easily be debunked.Gravity is real,it is a weak electrostacic attraction at the atomic level which compounds with mass.
rubberdown1969 3 years ago
Electric Universe theory explains it all, the energy is electric currents in magnetic fields & nothing to do with pressure lol.
rubberdown1969 3 years ago
Why sun energy changing all a time to not not so density energy? 5 billion years ago sun energy was much smaller area in space who dont expanding! Now that energy maked 10 billion lightyears splitter energyball! Why? because all energyconcentration expanding all a time. Also atoms nucleus expanding all a time. Also photons, electrons and neutrinos expanding all a time and they opening expanding energy all a time! Sorry, but thats the way it is!
Etimespace 3 years ago
This is so utter bulls*it, it makes me cry. How can anyone even state as illogical crap like this...aaargh! :D
Humidi 3 years ago 6
Reads few book about that how from Heliocentric model was resisted and how foolish claims Galilei Galileo should bump, before Heliocentric model started to move foolish from Country middle model to the litter basket
Etimespace 3 years ago
Galileo met resistance from the church, who wasn't going to let some scientist with a telescope upset their grand scheme. Now, we have the information superhighway, aka the internet. Free thinkers can not be silenced, nor bullied. However, i consider you a free thinker and i want to silence your illogical bullshit :D
What lab or evidence do you have to back every single outrageous claim up?
Convince people in Finland you are right, then they will hire a translator for the rest of us.
Basicpiviot 3 years ago
Maybe if u learned how to actually speak english correctly people could understand the bullshit coming out of your mouth.
deathdealer0902 3 years ago
Maybe! :);):)
Etimespace 3 years ago
You cant prove any way how space expanding or how space curving. Well. space dont expanding or doing anything!
I can prove that energy can change not so density energy.
Like sun doing all a time or like earth doing all a time or like you doing all a time.
5 miljards years ago sun energy was much smaller area what that energy it is now. Now this energy maked 10 miljards lightyears diameter energyball. So, sun changing all a time for not so density energy. It happens for atoms nucleus too
Etimespace 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All the phenomens can be explained by one force and this force is the pressure. (Don´t forget the power of thought! You also can move yourself by the power of thought! Quite right. You get yourself to move with the help of the muscles .
You so you send message of your brains to your muscles and you get yourself to move?
What is power/force of this thought, which get you to move there where you want?).
Etimespace 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We can describe by people what happens in the atomcores all the time. For example one thousand people can go to the space and curl up close to each other. Now we have made an energyconsentration of people that covers a
certain spot of the space. We know that the biggest part of the atoms is empty space. Also between people there exists empty space that does not expand or curve.
Etimespace 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These people can begin to straighten or in other words to open up and this way they push themselves away from each other. One can observe the hardest pressure in the middle of this human energyconsentration and people who locate in the middle must do an enormeous job so that they woun´t flatten in the centre. These people in the centre sweat the most. This is excactly the same thing that happens without gravitation for example in the centre of the earth and in the centre of the sun.
Etimespace 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The density of the human energyconsentration reduces and the people push themselves away from the centre of the human energyconsentration. Now for a little while we can observe a phenomen of gravitation without a drawing force (that actually does not exist) on the surface of the human
energyconsentration.
In my opinion the space does not expand or curve. If it would expand, could you describe how does the space expand?
Etimespace 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is easy to describe how the energy all the time turns into a less dense energy in the atomcores, so I think that it is time to forget all about the magical expanding and curving of the space. You can also forget all the spare spacedimentions, the dark substance and the dark energy.
So the space does not expand or curve!
The atomcores expand and open up expanding electrons and expanding photons and they beam their expanding energy as waves away from themselves.
Etimespace 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You look at the galax, you can understand that the energy inside the galaxy is denser than outside the galaxy. If you look at a star, you can understand that energy inside the star is denser than outside the star. You will know for sure that the energy inside the atomcore is denser than outside the atomcore. It is not difficult to understand that the energy inside the protons is denser than outside of them and the energy inside the quarks is denser than outside the quarks and so on...
Etimespace 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentration that bems energywaves with the nature of the galaxies, is formed also from separate three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentrations ect. And so the smaller separate energyconsentrations we talk about, the denser and denser the energy is all the time.
Etimespace 3 years ago
So the atomcore does not have a centre point, where the energy would be denser than outside it. There is no centre point also at the universe, outside which the energy would be less denser. Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away
from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe.
Etimespace 3 years ago
Wow, now any moron with a mouse can spout complete bullshit and pretend it's something like science. If this twat's ideas had any feasibility he'd be collecting his nobel prize. Sadly, he has completely misunderstood every science lesson he ever attended, but has the overwhelming arrogance to assume he is somehow smarter than Newton and Einstein.
alien8ted 3 years ago
Why you dont have theory for everything? Because you have a wrong physics. You cant even see space, but still you say, space expanding. No way. Lets take a thoausands people and make a people energyconcentration. All people going very near eachother and after that they start to opening and pushing themselfs far a way. Now middle of people energyconcentration have a pressure and people energyconcentration is not so density. Lets told me how space expanding? No, space dont expanding!
Etimespace 3 years ago
Let's renew some Etimespace videos!
Idea from Kuopio, No gravity and bending light!
You can change the image of the Universe with us!
Etimespace 3 years ago
How the size of the Sun is defined?
We can see the Sun, because the energy from the Sun comes towards us.
But, the energy that comes from the Sun towards us is its own energy. It is the one and same energy which the Sun consist of.
Here with us it just is less thickly than what it was "inside" the Sun. I wrote inside with the apostrophes, because now we can ask how big the Sun seriously is?
Etimespace 3 years ago
When the Sun caught fire, the energy has already openned forth from that area.
At the time when the Sun started to radiate light, It filled the certain amount of the space.
Nowadays that energy of the Sun fills in the space much larger area and the Sun has changed for the less densed energy, in the space which does not expand or arch.
Etimespace 3 years ago
If Sun is 5 billion years old, then the diameter of the ball forming from the energy of the Sun is 10 billion light years.
Quite a big Sun.
Much larger than five billion years ago.
In other words the energy of Sun has simply expanded or exploded or openned for much less densed energy as it was before, in the space which does not expand or arch.
Etimespace 3 years ago
How about amortal which forms from the "atoms" of photon energy.
This mortal goes away from the Sun with the photons opening from the Sun.
Even thought mortal goes away from the Sun billoion years, it would not observe for having removed farther from the Sun.
Nor wouldnt it notice how its own energy had changed to less densely..
Actually the mortal could not ever even see the Sun as we see it now.
Etimespace 3 years ago
The mortal atoms are the photons removing from the Sun. They explode and release energy waves, which have the nature of electrons and photons.
The surface of the mortals planet has opened from Sun five billion years ago. To this surface it can dig holes or walk on it.
For the mortal the Planet and its surface seems to be as big as always. It can stay on the surface, because the surface of the planet removes with increasing speed away from the Sun.
Etimespace 3 years ago
Not to mention that there is not enough "energy from space" to even stop this atomic expansion, even if we assumed it occurred. The energy provided from photons from space is not dense enough to do much at all on the atomic scale, let alone negate some sort of imaginary repulsion.
Gravity, in sum, does exist.
lucretius1 3 years ago
This violates everything we know about atomic physics. Atoms don't "expand" because all objects tend towards a ground state of energy, and this means that the atom takes on the smallest radius it can. Increasing radius means that either the energy state is excited, in which case this is not stable and will decay naturally OR the natural radius has increased, in which case, simple differential equations with exponentials demonstrate this cannot be the case.
lucretius1 3 years ago