as what Mrs Fan said, he should consult her before/after the meeting, when she commended him to sit, he should coz the meeting was chaired by her. trust me, before 1997, this kind of things would never happen. if you want others to respect you, you have to respect others too. just like his clothing, if you respect the meeting's place (a place to make decision for bettering hong kong), you should at least wear a shirt. not jean and t-shirt. he doesnt even respect the place....shame on him
I don't know about Hong Kong, but in America, the Senators and Congressmen have a certain time frame where they can speak. If the President of the Senate or the Speaker of the House requested something that is stipulated under the conduct code, fellow senators and congressmen have to follow. Therefore,I do not believe what Chairwoman Fan did was wrong. She was trying to continue with the daily proceeding and she has the right to do that. Councilman Leung did not follow with the procedure.
Whatever happens in US, stays in US. Just because things were handled in a certain manner doesn't necessary means that's the right way or the best way.
Afterall, we didn't vote for such a dumb ass president.
Are you suggesting that common courtesy is not the best way to pursue? Leung rudely interrupted the session for this request, which Chairwoman Fan addressed already, after several warnings.
In addition, I didn't mention anything about the President of the United States. I talked about the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House, since they are also the legislative branch of the government. Please read and research extensively before making such an irrelevant and uneducated comment.
I have problem with your wording. I think Leung politely, rather than "rudely" asked his question and stated his clarification. Whereas, Fan callously interrupted him. Obliviously Fan lost her nerve. It was like Fan wanted to shut him off not to lose face by giving your so-called "warnings" .
Regardless the manner he asked the question, I am addressing the action, not the question. Every meeting has its own set of rules and codes, Leung did not follow procedures like he was told by his superior, in this case, it was Chairwoman Fan. If every member of the council behaves like this, the council would be unorganized. Don't take me wrong that I have something against Leung. Fan told him that the flag was lowered, he need not to pursue his line of statements any further.
But Leung didn't even have a chance to announce his statement. After Fan's interruption, Leung clarified he was trying to do the follow-up, instead of causin' troble, 'cause Fan didn't reply him ahead of the meeting. God knows if Fan was tryin'to evade his request! With that said, don't you think Fan took advantage of Leung with her authoirity?
其實長毛哩d真系9人,好似我系街邊睇到d區議員咩成功爭取汽水機一樣,佢根本就系故意發表,令人知道佢有做d正義的野,以唔系,佢系想人知道佢有幾正義,政治9人來~
hungsuiwai 4 months ago
你長毛私下遞信 係議事程序個時當面提問 范太身為政治中立既主席 本來都唔應該係咁既場合答你呢D私人問題 好喇 答埋你喇 又要話答得唔清楚 又要話你答左我都唔信 即係要人地當面白紙黑字播埋片你先肯尊重議事程序? 仲要問范太做咩唔打俾佢 喂 唔係路呀嘛 使唔使解釋埋因為琴晚唔得閒所以無覆你call呀? 樓下仲要有人有腦唔用 一味隨意謾罵 因人廢言 失望!
christo361 8 months ago
范徐麗泰做得好..范徐麗泰自己都唔可以隨意發言..所以只能暗示..佢一早就知長毛想講咩..長毛唔明先搞成咁..本來都冇事..之後自己仲係要講..明明仲未可以發言..先被人趕走啦..
Garrrrry5 8 months ago
長毛道行晤夠范婦人黎架啦...
LoCLai 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
长毛虽然搞笑 但是很有正气 佩服
alanbfung 9 months ago
不會吧,惱羞成怒 係咁用咩?用得好難睇,咁就叫惱羞成怒, 用得一D 意思都冇, 只是想引人注意吧.我唔覺得范徐麗泰 叫做惱羞成怒. 只見其怒,而不見其惱羞. 所以更加不會有惱羞而成怒.
覺得長毛咁樣比人趕走而變得好型個D, 應該都係冇咩腦.
理由係, 佢冇咩著數, 真正有腦有計謀的人,不會咁樣比人趕走,因為比人趕走左,只會失去
在議會內發言同做事的機會, 覺得比人叫一聲就要坐,好似好冇面咁,好似一坐就係失敗投降,其實如果佢很坐,只會反應出長毛係一個有智慧有耐性有修養有計有謀的人.
好可惜,佢睇來冇咁ga智慧, 但長毛也可算係一個男子漢,總比很多人敢做敢言.
但日子久了,睇睇下,好似當自己係哲古華拉, 成日都要出位,出到又點,對[大家]又有咩好呢?
簡單講: 要成功要有勇有謀,只想扮哲古華拉的話,只會失敗.
xkwong701 11 months ago
長毛最後很帥 很有型
MingMing3628 1 year ago
长毛虽然搞笑 但是很有正气 佩服
chgy919 1 year ago 2
一看就知道系更年期果个行列的女人,做咩就系要野距呢!
yesterda 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"2:30范講:你所要求既已經做曬!你可以坐返低!
2:37再講:而家請你坐返低,話左比你聽,你要求既事已經同你做左,你坐返低! 你唔好破壞我地呢度氣氛啦!
2:51再講:我答左你啦,話比你聽你坐返低,我已經同你做左啦!
3:00再講:你唔應該嚮個會議廳度濫用議員發言既權利,你應該嚮會外問我,你唔應該嚮會議廳裹面,唔按照規程,唔按照議程隨意發言,呢個你係唔"arm"既........
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
係范冇答?定係長毛聽唔到人答?
范已經答左三次,佢既要求已經做左!?唔識"你既要求已經做左"係咩意思?
范亦有講到明呢個問題應該會議後問丫!
只係長毛一直失聰唔聽人回應只掛住自己講野吧?"
lungft 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2:30范講:你所要求既已經做曬!你可以坐返低!
2:37再講:而家請你坐返低,話左比你聽,你要求既事已經同你做左,你坐返低! 你唔好破壞我地呢度氣氛啦!
2:51再講:我答左你啦,話比你聽你坐返低,我已經同你做左啦!
3:00再講:你唔應該嚮個會議廳度濫用議員發言既權利,你應該嚮會外問我,你唔應該嚮會議廳裹面,唔按照規程,唔按照議程隨意發言,呢個你係唔"arm"既........
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
係范冇答?定係長毛聽唔到人答?
范已經答左三次,佢既要求已經做左!?唔識"已經做左"係咩意思?
范亦有講到明呢個問題應該會議後問丫!
只係長毛一直失聰唔聽人回應只掛住自己講野吧?
lungft 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2:30范講:你所要求既已經做曬!你可以坐返低!
2:37再講:而家請你坐返低,話左比你聽,你要求既事已經同你做左,你坐返低! 你唔好破壞我地呢度氣氛啦!
2:51再講:我答左你啦,話比你聽你坐返低,我已經同你做左啦!
3:00再講:你唔應該嚮個會議廳度濫用議員發言既權利,你應該嚮會外問我,你唔應該嚮會議廳裹面,唔按照規程,唔按照議程隨意發言,呢個你係唔"arm"既........
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
係范冇答?定係長毛聽唔到人答?
范已經答左三次,佢既要求已經做左!?唔識"已經做左"係咩意思?
范亦有講到明呢個問題應該會議後問丫!
只係長毛一直失聰唔聽人回應只掛住自己講野吧?
lungft 1 year ago
Comment removed
lungft 1 year ago
Comment removed
lungft 1 year ago
范徐麗泰 PK la .
nonograms 1 year ago
請你坐番低...你可以坐番低...(小怒)請你坐番低...(中怒) 請你坐番低...(大怒)請你坐番低...坐番低la...坐番低...坐番低... 一未只系識[我幫你做左la~]甘... 難道係去做雞???
a03165 1 year ago
哈哈!長毛真搞笑
cobianhuyan 1 year ago
范徐麗泰已經變成共產黨的走狗了!
k98hk 1 year ago 2
范太好嘢!!
EmperorChiCheung 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
長毛正仆街
siuk817 1 year ago
好似個班主任嬲個小學生
我可唔可以去toliet
唔得
我真係好急wow
都話 唔得囉
newzoned 1 year ago 2
堂堂正正比個回覆咪好囉, 做咩要趕人走
上個月兼職搵到$5000, 好開心!
w w w. ejobhk. net
easyjob001 1 year ago
范徐麗泰一直唔答咁長毛就當然一直問
范真係高"鬥"
LouisC89 1 year ago
最好香港来个大地震,就什么事都解决了。
xbdxbd 1 year ago
既然是立法会,就说明大家同意坐下来按照规则谈。同意现有规则并为自己争取利益。
希望香港能做好法治,民主示范。
myth206 1 year ago
@myth206 抵趕, 趕得太遲勒 ! 個個唔男唔女既咩鬼毛, ....好心啦, 唔好嘩眾取寵, 嘩親眾實取寵格, 係人都知啦, 幼稚, 低級, 邊個下次帶把太極劍, 同佢斬左D毛, 就好勒 !
washingzoo1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
六十年來國運開
老毛嗜殺鄧貪財
為求災星不降禍
爭先恐後當奴才
共產宣傳近百載
越傳越弱真不該
今日誰人識馬列
貪官污吏站前臺
Bugslightyear 2 years ago
范太 fuck off
99619962 2 years ago
范徐麗泰k sud冇錯
alvinism 2 years ago 4
這正正是所謂 講規則, 講 '和諧', 講統一口徑,
沒人性, 沒關心
荒謬.
ymt0702 2 years ago 2
吾解吾可以私下會外問呢?
有人選都要守下規則
kammy6114 2 years ago 2
范太講左可以係議會外問la,唔通范太好難搵咩?再者主席已破例話俾佢聽已經做左,佢仲死要面響度嘈,你係人選就大晒咩!
Barceman1 2 years ago
@Barceman1
講得好!我都唔認為范徐麗泰錯晒喎。跟規據做事,亦係議員嘅義務之一,我覺得有部份網民似乎愛毛心切,唔諗清楚是非就diu人。
EmperorChiCheung 1 year ago 7
@Barceman1 你沒有聽到范太一直沒有回覆嗎?
mjjonathan 1 year ago
佢約人要走~! 諗左個idea! 最後成功走人~!
mydenon 2 years ago 2
支持長毛 長毛 !!!!!
jonathanchu118 2 years ago
T.T
sunny974151 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
奴隶制(共产主义),奴隶主(共产党)拥有奴隶(人民)的制度。奴隶(人民)须为奴隶主(共产党)干活,无报酬,且无人身自由。法律确认奴隶为奴隶主的私有财产,共产主义跟奴隶制也一样,国家所有财产归共产党。人民跟本不可能享受自己生产所得的回报。奴隶主(共产党)对奴隶(人民)握有生杀予夺的权力,可随意奴役、杀害。奴隶(人民)没有独立的人格,没有任何自由和权利。
brokensocialism 2 years ago 2
as what Mrs Fan said, he should consult her before/after the meeting, when she commended him to sit, he should coz the meeting was chaired by her. trust me, before 1997, this kind of things would never happen. if you want others to respect you, you have to respect others too. just like his clothing, if you respect the meeting's place (a place to make decision for bettering hong kong), you should at least wear a shirt. not jean and t-shirt. he doesnt even respect the place....shame on him
chuktung 2 years ago
共产主义及社会主义是注定失败!现在全世界只有五个名字叫共产主义国家的国家.有多少个正在搞资本主义呢?大家心照明白!在共产国家的人民.个个做牛做马.共产党的幹部就大鱼大肉.当年毛泽东的肚子那麽大.中国人民个个都骨瘦如柴. 大家心里就明白了.西方的共产主义和社会主义是不适合中国的!中国共产党应该取消共党专政! 中国才有希望! 人权! 民主! 自由! 平等!
brokensocialism 2 years ago
我認為范徐麗泰冇錯~!
ENDLESS0205 2 years ago 6
「飯誰例拜」主席是偽君子。
attilahistory 2 years ago
范徐都話按左長毛要求做左lor, 佢仲死要講,都short short地... 我係佢我寧願收聲,一齊繼續去開會。要係為港人出聲的話,就應該唔應該為小事去被人幹離場。
khhenry 2 years ago
支持长毛,香港应该有表达不同声音的人
helloalaen 2 years ago 5
我覺得長毛雖然都好有同情心,但係破壞議事規則真係好過分.佢最多咪係傳媒度講咪算囉
henrytam1001 2 years ago
Respect to the Lost. Play the game by the Rules, Red card~~ OUT
siuwang888 2 years ago
我對范徐麗泰有D反感
jeffjeffjam 2 years ago 2
歷史的見證, 范太而家有冇反省?
numb5r 2 years ago
有勇無謀
hkkennyc 2 years ago
Well done, Mrs Fan
Doooku 2 years ago
下半旗沒有錯...但佢破壞规矩...其實亦有不對
saxocy 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
長毛好野! 支持長毛!
petermango123 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
范徐麗泰白痴?
manyankating 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
香港人好彩有長毛咁議員,如果唔係的話實被尼班低能狗官玩殘
Tran295 2 years ago 7
女人當政必妖術,以前幫英犬打飛机太多,正一垃圾會
Tran295 2 years ago
搞錯,長毛建議下半旗都有錯? 范太,你食屎吧啦! 你唔岩做立法會主席!
petermango123 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
長毛好乖
hkkhnyc 3 years ago 14
赶他是应为不守议事厅规矩,与他的提议内容无关。
违反规矩就该赶,不然大家都违反就像菜市场一样还议什么事?立什么法?支持长毛这样反专政的议员。亦不反对他另类的方式,但应该智慧一些寻找法律法规的漏洞,游走边缘,而不应该胡搅蛮缠,落人口实。
two2046 3 years ago 3
個主席真係好好笑,咁都得- -
2g314d31 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
范徐麗泰去死啦﹗
antisnobsociety 3 years ago
还是应该遵守会场规则
Shenzhenfootball 2 years ago 7
這是良心與規則的衝突,長毛建議下半旗正是良心的體現,至於違反議事規則,范太是可以懲罰他
rkwinwin 2 years ago 8
范徐麗泰惱羞成怒「紅牌」趕長毛
范徐小姐開頭都有道理
後來長毛一句[你冇回復我,我吾知你咩選擇]
就趕佢出去(趕佢出去之前都吾重申要選擇囉)
而佢自己又冇講清楚做左咩選擇
一未只系識[我幫你做左la~]甘
andypokemon1 3 years ago 22
@andypokemon1 主席趕他出去前所做的解釋:“由於你不遵守本席對你既要求,我也都對你做出了警告,所以現在我認為你今天不需要再在這個會議廳。”主席做出了多次警告,可是梁議員仍然繼續發言,我認為趕出去是合理的。
至於下半旗的要求,范徐麗泰已經多次表明:“你既要求已經幫你左o左,”我不知道閣下所謂的”選擇“是為何意?
wmygenius 3 months ago
就是做得不夠好看,在那個時候很難找下台階
而且長毛的賣點就是從不向上級妥協
當然這也是他自招的,而並非因衝動造成問題
有些事情不在直播時找碴, 最後結果只會是沉在海底的最深處
gn82137 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
长毛是傻逼
9692210 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
范徐麗泰 is a bitch
ksl007 3 years ago
ksl007 is a bitch
abcddcbaabcddcbaabcd 3 years ago
同意fsjgt
两个人都有唔啱。长毛在不适当场合讲不适当的说话,范太对长毛有 偏见,将事情严重化。
但范太實在不必要求長毛離場
因為長毛 已經好心平氣和了
雖然 長毛有不符合流程之處 但不致於要離場的地步
至於影片題目 就有點不合題了
wanglsrtq 3 years ago 9
我都入過去坐過,長毛有錯,但係佢吾敢做,佢跟本冇机會發言,佢都好有points,好過好多人,勁過breast chan!
albertshum1 3 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
屌那媽...你班友係盲定係聾呀?
好明顯長毛玩緊野啦....
成班弱智仔...壞學生挑戰老師呀?
唔好認自己係香港人添呀..影衰晒...
國有國法..家有家規呢八隻字都唔識...
范太講左N次..你要求既時我做好啦...仲要keep asking呢D咪就係明玩野咋嘛...屌..仲要死撐呀長毛..有病
有本事就唔好spam我...講贏我啦..
不過..對你地黎講..都幾有難度啦..
TomAnkit 3 years ago
結果幾日後大陸就宣佈下半旗
LONGTZE 3 years ago 12
長毛 doesn't show respect in the court room.. she already give him a chance to sit down
carltonlau2006 3 years ago 11
两个人都有唔啱。长毛在不适当场合讲不适当的说话,范太对长毛有偏见,将事情严重化。
fsjgt 3 years ago 7
其實范徐麗泰都算係咁
你睇下曾鈺成...
jirojiro1029 3 years ago 17
This comment has received too many negative votes show
黃陰民,甩毛的主要是以曄眾取寵的手法來混亂議事!除了漫骂以外,從没見過他們有何实质建議。用了我們那麼多社會资源的尊貴議員,我觉得我們納稅白费了。只會取笑人家語言能力,以人身攻擊取代实质議事,只可蒼白表明這些人剩下的只一張臭咀吧,只會煽情,实质政見,貢獻社會,欠奉了!
光是漫骂,我們需要他們嗎?
strongerthanviagra 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
多加一句,你們英語絕好嗎?幾次聽見甩毛说差勁的英語,笑到我肚痛。請好好反思,你們只會小丑般拋香蕉的尊貴議員,在用議員津资時,好意思嗎?我們不需要小丑煽情演劇,請拿出实力貢獻議會政治。别白花我們的社會资源。
你們的行為真的有點像台灣的民進党,亂、無能、浪费資源、只差一點到打鬥,貪腐。希望你們不會這樣
strongerthanviagra 3 years ago
長毛已經好有禮貌啦喎~~~
patrick3kuan 3 years ago 5
一句講晒!! 狗官太多!! 香港或中國人社會擦鞋文化太根深柢固!! 不過吊詭在d官成日擦錯鞋!! 同捉錯主子既心意.
joeyjordisonhin 3 years ago 2
我覺得唔合理,下半旗有咩問題呀?點解要會外問呀?唔係私人野喎!范太有問題!佢又叫人質詢,又唔俾人講野,好偏見!根本就唔想俾梁國雄講野!范太好唔公道囉~
minaotabo 3 years ago 10
关键五系距要求咩内容
立法会系一个庄严既地方,议员代表民众参加会议,应该严格遵守会议程序,长毛要求既内容无错啊,但系距五应该随意发言,应该尊重立法会程序
我觉得范太甘做并无不妥
qcnana 3 years ago
好似小學生比老師趕出課室咁...
我諗番起被老師針對ge同學
banzaofking 3 years ago 12
范太對長毛根本有偏見...
jchuoe 3 years ago 10
喪盡天良
PrayBrethren 3 years ago
support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛
support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛
support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛
support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛support長毛
范徐麗泰正仆街!!!!!!!!!
maowai 3 years ago
你未死過o架!敢話范太!仆街啦!
abctv1975 2 years ago
范徐麗泰正仆街
messihardaway35 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
范徐麗泰 kill 長毛
正仆街
miruru623 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
會程明明開始質詢緊
但係冇lala長毛插斷左
有咩都唔一定定要即時問ga ma
同埋范太都講左幫佢做左
我係中立ge
但長毛今次明顯唔係理直氣壯果個
kaming19891108 3 years ago
長毛係會議上話自己白紙黑字問范太,但范太竟然無回覆(我本身係公務員,覺得好匪夷所思,若有市民去信我部門,而部門唔回覆俾傳媒踢爆個處長都幾大鑊!)長毛又話范太唔接佢電話(大意)....注意范太一直無否認長毛指控而迴避,即係証明長毛所言非虛。
espn2204 3 years ago 6
(接)咁長毛係少數能面對面范太嘅場合嚟質范太我覺得無可厚非。而且在公事上,市民係有權知道范太依立法會主席呢個公家身份唔回覆議員嘅要求。
espn2204 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
長毛想出位者,范太警告過都系甘。
silentisnotgold 3 years ago
我鐘意最LAST 一句
den4442524 3 years ago 5
只說一問
死賤八婆(范徐麗泰)
equity0101 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
佢係咁叫下半旗... 咁係咪要范太話「好啦!我地依家香港下半旗!」先肯擺休呀?? 佢有冇權講做呀, 講多都無謂啦.. 都知佢果尾野架啦....
saragatha 3 years ago
支持社民連打倒曾蔭權
marscayso 3 years ago
范太隨便趕走人民選的議員,表示對人民的藐視
xxxcheung 3 years ago 11
我本身支持長毛但范徐麗泰冇錯喎,
就呢單野黎睇長毛有唔啱
nostrike 3 years ago
講得好!懂得分是非曲直!我欣賞你!
abctv1975 2 years ago
為人出民發言都有錯?, 我想問你, 有邊一個人夠膽喺讀書既時候話校長你做錯啦..冇..冇可能有..點解, 因為自己冇權力, 除非自己唔想讀書啦..你估長毛好想講野呀, 自己一d 權力都冇, 明知講咗都冇用, 明知比人鬧, 都要喺咁多人前講野, 冇錯, 主席係..佢係答咗佢. 一笱佢好明顯只係想應付住佢..唔通佢會話我未做,對唔住呀? ..係為人民既怕咩用多1 分鐘, 聽下佢講咩, 再唔啱聽先踢都未遲, 如果陣最後會講野既人都冇..我地只係會生活喺一個主席講野冇人可以發言既社會..呢d係為人民咩? 守規律可以令上面做野咩? 佢地佢做咗啦..做咩大家知咩?
mmmmgee 3 years ago 8
Agree~!我唔明長毛有咩錯...
日日報紙頭版都係四川大地震.有幾慘
大家唔會唔知~!下半旗係絕對正確~
問題係"長毛比北京早提出下半旗"...
試下係北京先提出下半旗
試問范徐麗泰會唔會仲咁態度?
一字咁淺,范太擺已經到明有"針對"成份
nami0511 3 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
你又真系夠膚淺,人地長毛唔跟議事程序系度問私人請求,比人趕系自己衰
bachelbel 3 years ago
引用 caine443 :曾蔭權呼籲社會各界,視乎情況許可,配合全國哀悼。香港政府機構及學校
5月19日至21日下半旗,表達對四川汶川大地震遇難同胞的深切哀悼。
所有政府人員5月19日下午2時28分默哀3分鐘。
請范徐麗泰向梁國雄道歉。
PS:膚淺?根本係范太一開始就千方百計截住長毛唔俾機會佢提「下半旗」
你唔好同我講"為四川大地震下半旗"係你口中"私人請求"...
nami0511 3 years ago 3
長毛呢次係有唔啱... 一來你入得去個議聽係應該尊重返, 當時又唔係同人拗緊嘢...
同埋范太都清楚咁答咗兩次, 已經幫佢提咗上去.. 呢樣嘢確實唔到范太話事, 你追問佢都無用.
nidron 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
吊 , ト街啦你 , 淨係識司法覆核晒能晒納稅人啲錢 , 你個合家富貴實有報應 , 唔能好咁能得戚呀你 , 人在做天在看 , 睇你同个冥嘴串得几耐 !
rest888 3 years ago
最令人憤惱既係呢個假持平狗奴才居然是市民評分最好最高既立法會議員。長毛雖然入到立法會,但可以發聲既平台仍然很受限制。大部份傳媒片面既報導只係長毛更被人邊緣化,大部份市民根本唔會了解事件的真相,只會當長毛係搞事分子。
望期毓民入到立法會,可以給多點 support 比長毛。將議會實際的情況透過個平台講比市民聽,令市民真正明白香港政治既荒謬,真正明白只有抗爭,才會改變。
7hzhang 3 years ago 12
北京未講野, 就話長毛提出下半旗唔合理;
北京一話要下半旗, 就死狗甘跟.
正狗賊
dytkai 3 years ago 26
犯婦人扮家長, 懢用主席霸權!
amdk2007 3 years ago 5
范太隨便趕走人民選的議員,表示對人民的藐視
xxxcheung 3 years ago 3
飯太是中共之食屎9.
samau88 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
范徐麗泰可恥
hinghing71268 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
長毛今次錯左啦
mbching 3 years ago
far out she sounds like my mum......
enochkam 3 years ago
支持長毛,支持長毛,支持長毛,支持長毛,支持長毛
支持長毛,支持長毛,支持長毛,支持長毛,支持長毛
liamgallagher232 3 years ago 3
老姣婆范徐麗泰!
dago9112012 3 years ago
支持長毛!!!
coolsam123456 3 years ago
我覺得係長毛想腰功 怕自己想到的事比人做先 范太冇做錯
timmytung 3 years ago
范徐麗泰真係賤人一個
wahlo1971 3 years ago 6
范徐麗泰真係on9 支持長毛~~~
88525 3 years ago 4
范太真係屈機...濫用權力..可恥
hornacek1789 3 years ago 7
范徐麗泰惱羞成怒,長毛哩鑊真係委屈
kelvinkeegan 3 years ago 7
愛國有罪 極權有理
這就是中國人的社會常態
hongkongtim 3 years ago 5
法國大革命時羅蘭夫人在上斷頭前說過:自由民主啊,多少人假汝之名作惡!
可以套用一句
民主啊,多少人假汝之名作惡!
Macaugiraffee 3 years ago 3
范徐麗泰快點返大陸做幹部!
718964 3 years ago
范太呢種正正係大陸官員既黑人憎咀臉.
patpatjp 3 years ago 4
范徐麗泰可恥
pingu32575 3 years ago 11
范徐麗泰不知所謂
crazy162 3 years ago 9
范徐麗泰可恥
HeAVyAids 3 years ago 11
下半旗事件若果由建制派"要求"一早"攪掂哂"啦~
係范徐麗泰針對長毛!!無論對與錯...........
chikinfr 3 years ago 11
長毛真可憐 香港人真可憐
victattat 3 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
范徐麗泰可恥!!!!
支持長毛 !!!!
bbathk 3 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
大家50/50la
tinyau123 3 years ago
默哀同下半旗事件, 長毛做得好岩, 我撐恆佢~~
但我覺得如果長毛有時守下立會發言規矩, 唔好立亂起身, 會唔會好d呢? 定係佢根本冇發言機會, 所以先要咁做?
chakazul 3 years ago 7
愛人民先係真正愛國。
如果話領導人比人民重要,根本只係貪戀權力既勢利之士。
kalam2710 3 years ago 6
犯婦人就係呢d咁既人
成9日係到扮中立,我見到都想嘔。
之前,中國駐南斯拉夫使館被炸,以及南亞海嘯等事件,香港立法會有默哀。又唔見佢咁講。正一小人。
鄧小平逝世就批准默哀,
趙紫陽就冇得默哀。
一個只係軍委主席(攝正王),就批准默哀。
一個係名正言順既共產黨總書記,就冇。
真係可笑。
個d咁既所謂守則
kalam2710 3 years ago 13
范徐麗泰可恥!!!!
photofai 3 years ago 5
法國大革命時羅蘭夫人在上斷頭前說過:自由民主啊,多少人假汝之名作惡!
可以套用一句
民主啊,多少人假汝之名作惡!
Macaugiraffee 3 years ago
係呀!中共成日話自己好民主架!行民主集中制、人民民主專制,你諷刺大陸呀?
espn2204 3 years ago 6
范徐麗泰 On99 ....
Seamonkey99 3 years ago 6
支持長毛
yeungchingwing2008 3 years ago 10
沒有抗爭, 那有改變!
全家總動員,票投社民連!
syho1 3 years ago 12
范徐麗泰可恥!!!!
wahlo1971 3 years ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
我就覺得范太岩啦~~
佢係主席,佢有權控制會內既規距...
梁國雄佢唔遵守呢個規距,范太有權請佢離場
calvinbeckham2006 3 years ago
兩個都無錯..
一個係立法會主席 佢當然要維持個秩序
一個係愛國之士 佢提出既野有道理既
但係mr leung提出既時間唔岩..
呢d野互相尊重架姐..如果當時mrs fan俾佢講..佢就亂左個規矩, 變相係佢失職
sam1280893 3 years ago 5
票投社民連
kkho123x 3 years ago
9月立法會選舉,全家總動員,票投社民連,5席入會,有好戲睇!!
jazzchi 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
投海你就有得投
diuleinomo 3 years ago
不管怎么说,长毛还是很爱国的。
tuyota1979 3 years ago 10
范徐麗泰正扑街
iad800 3 years ago
香港就是充滿盲目守規則的狗奴才!
沒有抗爭, 那有改變!
長毛擺明玩o野,你又如何!
fluketennis 3 years ago 2
长毛兄应该来大陆做政协委员啊,多些这样的人,某些官吏做事都会小心点.
rotenshou 3 years ago 3
沒用的,你們大陸的貪官污吏可是天不怕地不怕的。
jeffrman777 3 years ago
照妖鏡
whirlyho 3 years ago
支持長毛!下半旗係冇錯既!!做得好岩
lovemylovewan 3 years ago 8
你都算仆街。
diuleinomo 3 years ago
香港由文明走向黑暗, 就因為棺場多廢人!
huahangji 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
那样的殖民统治也叫文明!看看殖民者"文明"的掠夺手法,看看列强对中国"文明"的手段!看看有多少劳苦大众曾经生活在殖民者"文明"的统治下!香港的繁荣是由香港人的努力拼打出来的,如果说英国的好处,也就是提供了一个宽松的经济环境给香港人民。英国又从中捞到多少好处!
精明的商人不会经营赔本的买卖,西方人也并不是每一个都是撒播爱的种子的善心传教士! 有奶便是娘,是每一个中国人所不耻的,香港绝大部份中国人,是不会愿生活在殖民统治下做一个享受的二等公民的。 如果一个女人被强奸也叫什享受,我想会是在阁下所生活的地区吧!
bimuyux 3 years ago
I don't know about Hong Kong, but in America, the Senators and Congressmen have a certain time frame where they can speak. If the President of the Senate or the Speaker of the House requested something that is stipulated under the conduct code, fellow senators and congressmen have to follow. Therefore,I do not believe what Chairwoman Fan did was wrong. She was trying to continue with the daily proceeding and she has the right to do that. Councilman Leung did not follow with the procedure.
colordevil 3 years ago
colordevil :
Whatever happens in US, stays in US. Just because things were handled in a certain manner doesn't necessary means that's the right way or the best way.
Afterall, we didn't vote for such a dumb ass president.
kafante 3 years ago
Are you suggesting that common courtesy is not the best way to pursue? Leung rudely interrupted the session for this request, which Chairwoman Fan addressed already, after several warnings.
In addition, I didn't mention anything about the President of the United States. I talked about the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House, since they are also the legislative branch of the government. Please read and research extensively before making such an irrelevant and uneducated comment.
colordevil 3 years ago
I have problem with your wording. I think Leung politely, rather than "rudely" asked his question and stated his clarification. Whereas, Fan callously interrupted him. Obliviously Fan lost her nerve. It was like Fan wanted to shut him off not to lose face by giving your so-called "warnings" .
hkbaby1985 3 years ago
Regardless the manner he asked the question, I am addressing the action, not the question. Every meeting has its own set of rules and codes, Leung did not follow procedures like he was told by his superior, in this case, it was Chairwoman Fan. If every member of the council behaves like this, the council would be unorganized. Don't take me wrong that I have something against Leung. Fan told him that the flag was lowered, he need not to pursue his line of statements any further.
colordevil 3 years ago 2
Granted! Leung didn't follow the procedures.
But Leung didn't even have a chance to announce his statement. After Fan's interruption, Leung clarified he was trying to do the follow-up, instead of causin' troble, 'cause Fan didn't reply him ahead of the meeting. God knows if Fan was tryin'to evade his request! With that said, don't you think Fan took advantage of Leung with her authoirity?
hkbaby1985 3 years ago
Fan often protects the establsihment guys already. If ppl blindly follow rules, we're pursing nothing but bureaucracy.
hkbaby1985 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
一些"民主"人士怎不在"英皇时代出来请愿示威?
不为香港作贡献,整天瞎喊瞎叫,为了你们的主子.