I guess everybody would love to see how the NATO deals with a country that possesses nuclear weapons. too bad that ain't gonna happen. Obama is a wuss. same as his European allies
If the multi-billion dollar US-military apparatus is unable to cope with non-moving targets, like plants for instance, they should go home practice a little bit more...
...not to mention dealing with moving targets like Afghan tribal folks...
from a purely military point of view that would be be a good option ,if a bug ,fungus or some other pest would cause less harm .
the war on drugs has been going on since WW2 and has only popularized the use as a anti establishment civil protest against the ruthless capitalist corporations and zionest principles ,and the tax dollar saving on law inforcment reduction in pressure on prisions
privat prision may be against it , i think there concerns should be ignored ,, partyyy yeahh
Its a war for drugs and oil... These Cave dwellers didn't fly invisible planes in to the WTC. Sorry but I'm not that dumb to much proof to show that its an inside job.
They don't want to get rid of it they want to exploit off it and make money off it...
The Heroin deaths are on a rise here in the USA. Now that we have so much control in Afghanistan wonder why hmmm.
it's much easier to say go across the border and finish them all than to do. taliban is first of all spiritual order and secondarily military. fighting the spiritual things is hopeless. with all those ideas of scrifice to Allah, martyrdome, etc afganis and paks are undefitable. the more martyrs the more new comers will wish to enter the martyrdom.
US and NATO have lost the war... those "hajis" as they called them... beated their ass up... all the tech, all the money, the biggest and overpowered army in the world cant stand up agaisnt the taliban... that is a funny fact you know... just leave afghanistan mates... you already lost... and you will never win that war... also since you went there the production of drugs as raised like 1000%... some CIA ppl are getting rich, like negroponte did in nicaragua in the 80s...
the goal is: wipe out the taliban... and that is impossible... so that ocupation is going to be eternal =D Soviets failed... US have already failed too =D
Can be, can be. As I know, people in Central Asia likes to smoke it. I was living there in childhood.
>the russians managed to mold something to afghans that NATO never mangae to do, DISCIPLINE.
NATO's choise is to bribe field commanders. May be not so effective for territory control, but it saves many lives. And yes, sovets (soviets sounds as polish word, we don't use "i" here, sovEts = councils, bolsheviks = majorists) were strong in discipline.
The Russians were hated by almost every group that's why they fell apart.
No matter where you go you'll find a few people who are willing to sell out for money. However, most do not and so to control those people you will need to use violence and make sure the ones you've oppressed don't have/get the means to take you down
When foreign nations seeing the horror of the USSR intervened and provided military assistance to the oppressed it led to the "empires" rather quick downfall.
>The Russians were hated by almost every group that's why they fell apart.
The reason is Eltzin's treason, who wished to have power. There was the referendum in 1991th, 72% of votes were for stying in the Union (of SSR). Hatred was among small groups of narrow-minded fools tricked by anti-rus. sentiments promoted with western help. Brightest example -- posters of that time in Kiev: "Without Moscow we will be living like France". Now Russia's life level 2-3 times higher than in that "France".
The USSR was a hotbed of intolerance and why it broke up (ppl. were forced to abandon their culture/religions or die).
There are few people on this Earth who aren't happy it's done with. Even China abandoned Communism and is now trying to reform their society (you can say it's a police state but it's getting and will get better).
Russia's "life level" (I don't really know what that means but I assume you're talking about life expectancy) is much lower than Frances.
Hear me, ignoramus. The Union (as well as the Russian empire and modern Russia) was the most tolerant country in the world, that's why tatars, for example, could speak on their own language even 500 years after Kazan''s taking. Now look at Europe -- "No entry for dogs and irishmen" -- or to the New world -- wage slavery for non-"whites" or even total annihilation for natives. Russia -- no genocides for being "not white". Remember it, ignoramus
You are a complete moron. So you're telling me the millions of people forcibly displaced and murdered didn't happen?
They burned down peoples places of worship, their holy books and forbid them from worshiping whatever religion they pleased or face severe retribution
I never sided with Europe but the end of Communism was a great thing - Communism resulted in more death and misery than probably every other government system (and possibly war) in the last 100 - 200 years combined.
>When foreign nations seeing the horror of the USSR intervened and provided military assistance to the oppressed...
Pfff, "foreign nations" (you mean western ones as i guess) commited much more crimes and killed much more people. I even don't talking about the number of aggressive wars started be these foreign nations and by Russia. Enough to say that for the last 100 years just one US has started more wars than Russia for all 1000-year history. But US is "the leader in human rights", right?
I never said the US hasn't committed it's share of war crimes and is guilty of horrendous acts that continue today (including torture, murder, illegal detention, etc...)
However, Communism was terrible and in truth the concept can't work.
The UN should firmly act against the rise of neo-Nazism and attempts to rewrite the results of the WW II, Dmitry Medvedev said on Thursday. "I'm convinced that firm and collective response to signs of neo-Nazism and attempts to revise the results of the WWII enshrined in the UN Charter should remain a priority task for the United Nations," Medvedev said at the 64th session of the UN Assembly. He said that Russia proposes holding a special session on WWII in May to adopt a resolution on the issue
The Americans Really dont have the Heart for Battle. They only like it if things are going their way. Once they are challenged by a real enemy they Cry and want exit strategy.
We'll have to see about that one won't we? I think it's a little early to be saying whether or not the US can achieve some strategic goals over there.
i think most of ppl in the america gnawing envy. "how? we here r fighting by the whole crowd, losing ppl, and the russians just stand aloof and giggling. even lecture us: ya with less effort and without spending all dat money reached great results." do ya want dat our guys perished too? nope, hardly. enough, alrdy did, now ur turn. best what russia can make, is strengthen positions on the border. the first line of afghan-tajikistan, the second line of tajikistan-russia.
504az haha :) you are right, I know this is exactly happening now. But I also think the war in Afghanistan will still take 3 to 5 years to reach stability and within that time, just maybe Russian Army like to show off their new Toys :xD
Slow down? Isnt the US army out there supposed to fight terrorism? Anyone who thinks its ok to grow heroine , trade and abuse the drugs is a idiot! One time not so long a go I found a man in the street who had used heroine he was laying on the street asking for help because he was not able to get up and walk, I ask what was wrong. He told me he had a heroine problem than he pulled out a gun from under his jacket and wanted to sell it for more heroine.One shot and you are dammed for life.
the most funny things dat all this terrorists were trained by the cia. america gave them weapon and said go and kill for our democracy. and now all this american guys should bring them their democracy
"it's a war for drugs and oils"
Yeah, 22 trillion dollar's wasted of Nato / Blufor money for oil wells that are run by BP and Shell, both private countries.
grow the fuck up children, get off the internets.
Mattc23q 7 months ago
1:29 was that all the poppy yo
weedyak 1 year ago
Nuke Pakistan and Afghanistan, wipe em off the face of the earth....who the fuck gonna miss em?
job done....nasty peado followers
FukALLreligion 2 years ago
"If one person is killed - that's a MURDER.
If hundred thousands are killed - that's a FOREIGN POLICY"
Kofi Annan
jankopat 2 years ago
The consequences of taking out the poppy fields would have a massive impact. However, the impact on citizens would also be felt.
Its my understanding that by doing such a tactic it would would hurt the people more.
I say GTFO , get out of the middle east , downsize the military.
ezze902 2 years ago
The CIA are the biggest drug pushers on the planet.
Kullg4r 2 years ago 2
LOL! invade Pakistan? that's an awesome idea!
I guess everybody would love to see how the NATO deals with a country that possesses nuclear weapons. too bad that ain't gonna happen. Obama is a wuss. same as his European allies
TTok33 2 years ago
Just imagine: A house is burning, and the firemen come and spray burning gasoline into the house to extinguish the fire...
Ironic huh?
Well thats how our world works, and if you don't like it... SHUT UP!
God save America
Maxuskrachus 2 years ago
wow thats a great idea start a war with country that have nukes.
ahahahahahahaha
chan0chap 2 years ago
If the multi-billion dollar US-military apparatus is unable to cope with non-moving targets, like plants for instance, they should go home practice a little bit more...
...not to mention dealing with moving targets like Afghan tribal folks...
War on drugs/poverty/terror is senseless!
War = at least two standing armies!
Everything else is policing!
Tressco 2 years ago
The drugs they send to the U.S. E.U. & Russia are killing people everyday,
Opium is a WMD and they have used it on us!
We should spray it all the plants & the people.
Let it rain Blue Yellow & Orange Rain.
karma is a bitch!
Wasp16mm 2 years ago
We should stop the war on drugs...we cannot even fight it over here, why do it over there also?
HarryNRubin 2 years ago 2
from a purely military point of view that would be be a good option ,if a bug ,fungus or some other pest would cause less harm .
the war on drugs has been going on since WW2 and has only popularized the use as a anti establishment civil protest against the ruthless capitalist corporations and zionest principles ,and the tax dollar saving on law inforcment reduction in pressure on prisions
privat prision may be against it , i think there concerns should be ignored ,, partyyy yeahh
:)
youstupidwoman 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
penis
ImRichBitch1994 2 years ago
and testicles sweet hart i got both
youstupidwoman 2 years ago
Its a war for drugs and oil... These Cave dwellers didn't fly invisible planes in to the WTC. Sorry but I'm not that dumb to much proof to show that its an inside job.
They don't want to get rid of it they want to exploit off it and make money off it...
The Heroin deaths are on a rise here in the USA. Now that we have so much control in Afghanistan wonder why hmmm.
NonMasonOrder 2 years ago 5
of course, their dragging it along...
xXGoDxiSxdEaDx666Xx 2 years ago
it's much easier to say go across the border and finish them all than to do. taliban is first of all spiritual order and secondarily military. fighting the spiritual things is hopeless. with all those ideas of scrifice to Allah, martyrdome, etc afganis and paks are undefitable. the more martyrs the more new comers will wish to enter the martyrdom.
mikkitiny 2 years ago
US and NATO have lost the war... those "hajis" as they called them... beated their ass up... all the tech, all the money, the biggest and overpowered army in the world cant stand up agaisnt the taliban... that is a funny fact you know... just leave afghanistan mates... you already lost... and you will never win that war... also since you went there the production of drugs as raised like 1000%... some CIA ppl are getting rich, like negroponte did in nicaragua in the 80s...
Ryaguas 2 years ago 2
It never was a war. It's and occupation. Theres no standing enemy army. Its just angry peasants with guns.
Any military would have trouble with people taking a few shots at your back from a mountain then running away.
US will pull out when it feels it has accomplished its goal.
dopefish55 2 years ago 4
the goal is: wipe out the taliban... and that is impossible... so that ocupation is going to be eternal =D Soviets failed... US have already failed too =D
Ryaguas 2 years ago 4
Yes, that dude is right, there is no war, beacause Taliban's government wasn't recognized as legitime.
Though USSR achieved more success:
1.President Najibula was fighting 2 years alone, with no support, when Russia stopped help; how much days Karzaj could resist with no nato?
2. USSR was controlling almost all territories, not even large cities and military bases as nato does;
3. There is no help to Taliban from inside (as USA stupidly did in 1980's and now gain results of own support).
Nitrorus 2 years ago
the russians managed to mold something to afghans that NATO never mangae to do, DISCIPLINE.
US soldiers now gree, that statisticaly about 1-2/3 of ANA soldiers are hashish users, LOL.
Ome99 2 years ago
:-)
Can be, can be. As I know, people in Central Asia likes to smoke it. I was living there in childhood.
>the russians managed to mold something to afghans that NATO never mangae to do, DISCIPLINE.
NATO's choise is to bribe field commanders. May be not so effective for territory control, but it saves many lives. And yes, sovets (soviets sounds as polish word, we don't use "i" here, sovEts = councils, bolsheviks = majorists) were strong in discipline.
Nitrorus 2 years ago
@Nitrorus
The Russians were hated by almost every group that's why they fell apart.
No matter where you go you'll find a few people who are willing to sell out for money. However, most do not and so to control those people you will need to use violence and make sure the ones you've oppressed don't have/get the means to take you down
When foreign nations seeing the horror of the USSR intervened and provided military assistance to the oppressed it led to the "empires" rather quick downfall.
ticklemegangrene 1 year ago
>The Russians were hated by almost every group that's why they fell apart.
The reason is Eltzin's treason, who wished to have power. There was the referendum in 1991th, 72% of votes were for stying in the Union (of SSR). Hatred was among small groups of narrow-minded fools tricked by anti-rus. sentiments promoted with western help. Brightest example -- posters of that time in Kiev: "Without Moscow we will be living like France". Now Russia's life level 2-3 times higher than in that "France".
Nitrorus 1 year ago
@Nitrorus
The USSR was a hotbed of intolerance and why it broke up (ppl. were forced to abandon their culture/religions or die).
There are few people on this Earth who aren't happy it's done with. Even China abandoned Communism and is now trying to reform their society (you can say it's a police state but it's getting and will get better).
Russia's "life level" (I don't really know what that means but I assume you're talking about life expectancy) is much lower than Frances.
ticklemegangrene 1 year ago
>The USSR was a hotbed of intolerance tra-la-la.
Hear me, ignoramus. The Union (as well as the Russian empire and modern Russia) was the most tolerant country in the world, that's why tatars, for example, could speak on their own language even 500 years after Kazan''s taking. Now look at Europe -- "No entry for dogs and irishmen" -- or to the New world -- wage slavery for non-"whites" or even total annihilation for natives. Russia -- no genocides for being "not white". Remember it, ignoramus
Nitrorus 1 year ago
@Nitrorus
You are a complete moron. So you're telling me the millions of people forcibly displaced and murdered didn't happen?
They burned down peoples places of worship, their holy books and forbid them from worshiping whatever religion they pleased or face severe retribution
I never sided with Europe but the end of Communism was a great thing - Communism resulted in more death and misery than probably every other government system (and possibly war) in the last 100 - 200 years combined.
ticklemegangrene 1 year ago
>When foreign nations seeing the horror of the USSR intervened and provided military assistance to the oppressed...
Pfff, "foreign nations" (you mean western ones as i guess) commited much more crimes and killed much more people. I even don't talking about the number of aggressive wars started be these foreign nations and by Russia. Enough to say that for the last 100 years just one US has started more wars than Russia for all 1000-year history. But US is "the leader in human rights", right?
Nitrorus 1 year ago
@Nitrorus
I never said the US hasn't committed it's share of war crimes and is guilty of horrendous acts that continue today (including torture, murder, illegal detention, etc...)
However, Communism was terrible and in truth the concept can't work.
ticklemegangrene 1 year ago
>You are a complete moron.
Goodbye, bitch from Pindostan! ;-)
Nitrorus 1 year ago
The UN should firmly act against the rise of neo-Nazism and attempts to rewrite the results of the WW II, Dmitry Medvedev said on Thursday. "I'm convinced that firm and collective response to signs of neo-Nazism and attempts to revise the results of the WWII enshrined in the UN Charter should remain a priority task for the United Nations," Medvedev said at the 64th session of the UN Assembly. He said that Russia proposes holding a special session on WWII in May to adopt a resolution on the issue
needbailout 2 years ago
The reality: USA and NATO lost the war in Afganistan, other little Viet nam, the US modern Viet nam, Gringos or yankees, go home, you lost the war.
ZarinVxx 2 years ago 4
The Americans Really dont have the Heart for Battle. They only like it if things are going their way. Once they are challenged by a real enemy they Cry and want exit strategy.
HeartBreak1x 2 years ago 4
ya r absolutely right man
504az 2 years ago
good analysis
RoyalDemonforChrist 2 years ago
osamabama's to buisy, campainning, to do any real presidential work.
he's doing what he did, at his other gov. jobs. osamabama's voting present.
he's a Damm Fool, that cares more about the Olimpics, then he does, our Troops!
Hopefully he'll be gone soon!
rebelstang 2 years ago
You can bet that the CIA is going to move some of that heroine into profitable zones to help fund this war.
RyRyVids 2 years ago
We'll have to see about that one won't we? I think it's a little early to be saying whether or not the US can achieve some strategic goals over there.
RyRyVids 2 years ago
The US shouldn't even be in Afganistan.
CMLovejoy 2 years ago
yup I have been Saying NAPALM for a year now. American Pussy. Mabye Russia should go in and finish the job ;--*
14842 2 years ago
orly? why russia should clean up after america? ya r welded shut this shit and deal with it by urself
504az 2 years ago
how els is russia going to deal with its drugs problem? little persons like you need thair shit : O.o
14842 2 years ago
i think most of ppl in the america gnawing envy. "how? we here r fighting by the whole crowd, losing ppl, and the russians just stand aloof and giggling. even lecture us: ya with less effort and without spending all dat money reached great results." do ya want dat our guys perished too? nope, hardly. enough, alrdy did, now ur turn. best what russia can make, is strengthen positions on the border. the first line of afghan-tajikistan, the second line of tajikistan-russia.
504az 2 years ago
504az haha :) you are right, I know this is exactly happening now. But I also think the war in Afghanistan will still take 3 to 5 years to reach stability and within that time, just maybe Russian Army like to show off their new Toys :xD
14842 2 years ago
lol? we r even dont know how looks like pak fa, it was should be on our air show...
504az 2 years ago
wo wo wo slow down bud, yes russia has a drug problem but the U.S takes the cake in that field.
pinardelrio4 2 years ago
Slow down? Isnt the US army out there supposed to fight terrorism? Anyone who thinks its ok to grow heroine , trade and abuse the drugs is a idiot! One time not so long a go I found a man in the street who had used heroine he was laying on the street asking for help because he was not able to get up and walk, I ask what was wrong. He told me he had a heroine problem than he pulled out a gun from under his jacket and wanted to sell it for more heroine.One shot and you are dammed for life.
14842 2 years ago
14842: They tried that remember and it didnt get them anywhere
shipoopi92 2 years ago
ya cause russia knows how to win the heart of the afgan lmao!
ovadafone 2 years ago
what afghanistan have got when there was the soviet army? schools, roads, power plants. and what with america? only drugs dat goes to russia
504az 2 years ago
They are also Training Turks and Chechens. Both of the so called Government in Exile of Russia and China is in USA.
HeartBreak1x 2 years ago
the most funny things dat all this terrorists were trained by the cia. america gave them weapon and said go and kill for our democracy. and now all this american guys should bring them their democracy
504az 2 years ago
The Cia is corrupt to the bone
Paganiproductions 2 years ago 2
Yeah did you wach Rambo 3?
HeartBreak1x 2 years ago
yep, but i remember only stallone lol
504az 2 years ago
)))
germanovich3D 2 years ago
he sounds like a robot lol
Ghazi079 2 years ago
You sound like a cunt.
MarshallKutuzov 2 years ago