what should they have gone in with labour? while i dont approve of the torries or the current government and while the conservatives may be more fiscally right wing, labour are a more authoriatarian party. Lets face it the lib dems had to go with someone and thus compromise and they are closer to the torries than labour, I mean some conservatives are close to being classical liberals
True, but why so vehemently campaign against the many policies they now support, if they were so ready to compromise/change their minds? It shows their pre-election campaigning was about getting votes at any cost more than it was a genuine belief in their so-called policies.
People need to realise that democratic regimes are actually not democratic, this system is of a bygone era when a man to represent thousands of people in another part of the country was necessary but due to modern communications/ technology they are no longer needed. They do not serve the will of the people at all and need to be replaced, the parties they represent work against democracy! The people should propose new legislation/ laws/ changes, then the people approve it!
Would that be the Civil rights where a protester is pulled from his wheelchair by police for not readily excepting Nick Clegg's fickle change of mind?
@onwebcameron um, yes. Under Labour protests were banned and we were arrested for sitting peacefully. That guy 'in a' wheelchair - who can walk, broke into millbank and instigated riots. Only 25,000 people attended (vs. 2million opposed to Blair) and they attacked innocent civilians, desecrated the cenotaph, tried to burn the Traf sq xmas tree and still...it's legal. Liberal's say "no ban!" even though Labour' appointed police chief has asked for it. So yeah. The spin is from Lab people still!
Still doesn't change the fact that Clegg's lying actions instigated these riots. I think it was the Tories that built the Downing street gates, as they were so unpopular at the time, and them that saw the bloodiest riots last time they were in office. By comparison Blair's civil unrest was mild, and these guys haven't been in a year yet. They must be doing something wrong? Anyway I have let you have your say, unlike webcameron, where they seem to employ people to remove posts.
So you think it was okay to assault the guy in the wheelchair then?
The guy in the wheel chair, who has cerebral palsy was not causing trouble with the police on that occaision, if you say he was identified as a guy who was walking when he 'broke into Millbank' then he should be arrested and put through the courts, if they have that evidence, not dragged across the pavement from his wheel chair.
@onwebcameron he wasn't assaulted, he was removed from blocking the police reinforcing their lines. he was at a riot, he is an equal human being, he was treated well. Tony liar banned all protests there and he would have been arrested and detained for peaceful protest. he has been arrested for B&E. Also - he can walk. The behaviour of 25.000 Labour supporters rioting and terrorising the city was appalling and NOT democratic. you screwed the country and lost the election. deal.
He was hit with a baton by the same officer who came back to him later and dragged him out of a wheelchair, that you could either 'wheel' or 'lift' with the help of others who aided him, if you genuinely wanted to remove him rather than intimidate him. Just because he can sometimes walk does not mean he doesn't also need a wheelchair at times. I have known people living with cerebral palsy and this seems to be consistent with them too.
@carlitox472 .....are you on crack? the man in the weel chair can not walk and protests weren't banned under labour...that was the conservatives under the criminal justice act, get your facts right shidiot and admit that the lib dems will shit on an orphan whos puppy just died for a little bit of power, also your referring to one demo and forgetting about the hundreds that have been going on across the country,
In just a few weeks the coalition government appear to have broken more promises than Labour in that time, encouraged more sleaze and immorality and been just as quick off the mark to starve even our kids and old folk through cuts and taxes.
They've even been more efficient at emptying our jails and surrendering what's left of our independence to the EU!
Click my name to watch CON-DEM COALITION CONNING YOU WITH THEIR SOCIAL FAILURES and see what you think.
@face2faec89 In just a few weeks the coalition government appear to have broken more promises than Labour in that time, encouraged more sleaze and immorality and been just as quick off the mark to starve even our kids and old folk through cuts and taxes.
They've even been more efficient at emptying our jails and surrendering what's left of our independence to the EU!
Click my name to watch CON-DEM COALITION CONNING YOU WITH THEIR SOCIAL FAILURES and see what you think.
I think it's very clever and absolutely hilarious .. a cartoon, and I'm not in the slightest bit ignorant ..or party political ( unlike MCBRRRRSN who is so loyal to his party ,the lib dems, that if the coalition made Nick Griffin a race relations minister .. he'd approve ..) that's why he's not awfully clever .
How long did it take for you to come up with that witty retort. Funny the Tory supporters are always witless and the most offensive, but fail to proffer any valid argument. It's a cartoon, get over it.
Thanks for the comment, I can understand your anger. I do not think you are alone, many prominent figures are guessing two years and it'll be over. Even many Tories are saying the five years minimum term stated is an illegal imposition and will challenge it, with Labour, to make a vote of no confidence easier to impose.
Without the third party, Tories win a flat out majority.
Labour/Socailists should be kissing Nick Clegg's feet and asking themselves how leftists could support a Labour party that conducted an illegal war on Iraq and borrowed from their grandchildren to prop up parasitic banks.
@Illimitus The Tories supported the war on Iraq, and the LD's have formed a full coalition with them. They lose their right to criticise such things now. Their own policies will become intertwined with the Tories' in the minds of the electorate.The Tories would have been a smaller party in power, (yet no less stable), and the LD's, left free to criticise and expose their policies, now their hands are tied, and the only credible voice opposing them will be Labour. They have lost their voice.
Not go for power at any cost, perhaps? I don't buy this stability thing, as this may turn out to be anything but. People voted Lib-Dem for a variety of reasons, some believed the hyped up debates, gave Clegg a real chance to win. Others thought it a protest vote against Labour, while not allowing the Tories power, or that they weren't convinced that the Tories had changed. This is an unlikely alliance, therefore unfair to use those Lib-Dem votes this way. It is opportunistic.
Good luck with that then, I doubt the Tories will let them get much through. Now it is a real coalition though, they will also be forced into presenting objectionable Tory policies, as 'one voice'. Taking the inevitable blame and shame that will go with that.
Check out Vince Cable on my favourites. A good speech but can we believe a word the man says,now he is working for/with the 'Snake oil salesman' himself?
At best they will prolong and prop up a dreadful Tory regime.
@DracoSlashHarry : Since Clegg very sportingly announced that the his fellow ex-posh public schoolboy Ca-Moron should have first shout, since his party had the most seats, what peculiar logic did he apply for himself, as the leader of the party with the LEAST seats, to not only share power with the party that most of his voters desperately wanted to keep OUT, but become deputy PM into the bargain?
what should they have gone in with labour? while i dont approve of the torries or the current government and while the conservatives may be more fiscally right wing, labour are a more authoriatarian party. Lets face it the lib dems had to go with someone and thus compromise and they are closer to the torries than labour, I mean some conservatives are close to being classical liberals
rehanabey 5 months ago
@rehanabey
True, but why so vehemently campaign against the many policies they now support, if they were so ready to compromise/change their minds? It shows their pre-election campaigning was about getting votes at any cost more than it was a genuine belief in their so-called policies.
onwebcameron 5 months ago
Simple but effective, states the point clearly, love it :)
1996KTDW 10 months ago
People need to realise that democratic regimes are actually not democratic, this system is of a bygone era when a man to represent thousands of people in another part of the country was necessary but due to modern communications/ technology they are no longer needed. They do not serve the will of the people at all and need to be replaced, the parties they represent work against democracy! The people should propose new legislation/ laws/ changes, then the people approve it!
angloengland 11 months ago
The Liberal Alliance has been good for civil rights. At least spin is dead
carlitox472 1 year ago
@carlitox472
Would that be the Civil rights where a protester is pulled from his wheelchair by police for not readily excepting Nick Clegg's fickle change of mind?
onwebcameron 1 year ago
@onwebcameron um, yes. Under Labour protests were banned and we were arrested for sitting peacefully. That guy 'in a' wheelchair - who can walk, broke into millbank and instigated riots. Only 25,000 people attended (vs. 2million opposed to Blair) and they attacked innocent civilians, desecrated the cenotaph, tried to burn the Traf sq xmas tree and still...it's legal. Liberal's say "no ban!" even though Labour' appointed police chief has asked for it. So yeah. The spin is from Lab people still!
carlitox472 1 year ago
@carlitox472
Still doesn't change the fact that Clegg's lying actions instigated these riots. I think it was the Tories that built the Downing street gates, as they were so unpopular at the time, and them that saw the bloodiest riots last time they were in office. By comparison Blair's civil unrest was mild, and these guys haven't been in a year yet. They must be doing something wrong? Anyway I have let you have your say, unlike webcameron, where they seem to employ people to remove posts.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
@carlitox472
So you think it was okay to assault the guy in the wheelchair then?
The guy in the wheel chair, who has cerebral palsy was not causing trouble with the police on that occaision, if you say he was identified as a guy who was walking when he 'broke into Millbank' then he should be arrested and put through the courts, if they have that evidence, not dragged across the pavement from his wheel chair.
That is the democracy, you seem to be against.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
@onwebcameron he wasn't assaulted, he was removed from blocking the police reinforcing their lines. he was at a riot, he is an equal human being, he was treated well. Tony liar banned all protests there and he would have been arrested and detained for peaceful protest. he has been arrested for B&E. Also - he can walk. The behaviour of 25.000 Labour supporters rioting and terrorising the city was appalling and NOT democratic. you screwed the country and lost the election. deal.
cyclingheroify 1 year ago
@cyclingheroify
He was hit with a baton by the same officer who came back to him later and dragged him out of a wheelchair, that you could either 'wheel' or 'lift' with the help of others who aided him, if you genuinely wanted to remove him rather than intimidate him. Just because he can sometimes walk does not mean he doesn't also need a wheelchair at times. I have known people living with cerebral palsy and this seems to be consistent with them too.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
@carlitox472 .....are you on crack? the man in the weel chair can not walk and protests weren't banned under labour...that was the conservatives under the criminal justice act, get your facts right shidiot and admit that the lib dems will shit on an orphan whos puppy just died for a little bit of power, also your referring to one demo and forgetting about the hundreds that have been going on across the country,
charliewhat 9 months ago
ha ha very funny
mickey6783 1 year ago
uk democracy? haha,thats funny
1RollDeep 1 year ago
I'm that guy. ):
Sasha2999 1 year ago
In just a few weeks the coalition government appear to have broken more promises than Labour in that time, encouraged more sleaze and immorality and been just as quick off the mark to starve even our kids and old folk through cuts and taxes.
They've even been more efficient at emptying our jails and surrendering what's left of our independence to the EU!
Click my name to watch CON-DEM COALITION CONNING YOU WITH THEIR SOCIAL FAILURES and see what you think.
TheDustpile 1 year ago
true we are conned + condemened
face2faec89 1 year ago
@face2faec89 In just a few weeks the coalition government appear to have broken more promises than Labour in that time, encouraged more sleaze and immorality and been just as quick off the mark to starve even our kids and old folk through cuts and taxes.
They've even been more efficient at emptying our jails and surrendering what's left of our independence to the EU!
Click my name to watch CON-DEM COALITION CONNING YOU WITH THEIR SOCIAL FAILURES and see what you think.
TheDustpile 1 year ago
Not even remotely amusing.
ShutterBug10lol 1 year ago
@ShutterBug10lol
Although according to your channel you liked it, twice!
onwebcameron 1 year ago 4
truly awful
dubmywub 1 year ago
@dubmywub Not as awful as what the LibDems have done
IAMAPLANTPOT 1 year ago
@dubmywub
Lets see what you can do then, your channel appears to be empty of content and creativity.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
nice animation-shows how stupid people are when they vote conservatives
BassettReviewer 1 year ago
I think it's very clever and absolutely hilarious .. a cartoon, and I'm not in the slightest bit ignorant ..or party political ( unlike MCBRRRRSN who is so loyal to his party ,the lib dems, that if the coalition made Nick Griffin a race relations minister .. he'd approve ..) that's why he's not awfully clever .
SarahAntsez 1 year ago 7
Well, aren't you awfully clever. Not only are you parroting the phrase the ignorant love so much, you've made it into a poo joke.
MCBRRRRSN 1 year ago
@MCBRRRRSN
What parroting? It is a predominantly visual cartoon. The only 'parrot' is the dead yellow one. And poo jokes are fine, It's a cartoon.
I don't think I'm 'awfully clever', but if you are not trying to be patronising, I accept that maybe you think I am, thanks.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
fuck you lefty
JamesTilsley1 1 year ago
@JamesTilsley1
How long did it take for you to come up with that witty retort. Funny the Tory supporters are always witless and the most offensive, but fail to proffer any valid argument. It's a cartoon, get over it.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
@JamesTilsley1 fuck you tory cocksucker!
rainfordmetallica 1 year ago 2
Voters have been duped. The results were a classic bait-and-switch technique used by corporate criminals.
Pepper6464 1 year ago 2
@Pepper6464
I like that description, thanks.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
That's what you get when you vote because a candidate is "good looking" compared to Shrek aka Gordon Brown.
Pepper6464 1 year ago
Good video, try visiting fuckdavidcameron(dot)info
WhoSaidThatMixtape 1 year ago
This election has proven just what a bunch of opportunistic, two faced, untrusthworthy shisters the libdems are. I will never vote for them again.
Graemeyh 1 year ago
@Graemeyh
Thanks for the comment, I can understand your anger. I do not think you are alone, many prominent figures are guessing two years and it'll be over. Even many Tories are saying the five years minimum term stated is an illegal imposition and will challenge it, with Labour, to make a vote of no confidence easier to impose.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
This is brill! Very funny.
Graemeyh 1 year ago
Without the third party, Tories win a flat out majority.
Labour/Socailists should be kissing Nick Clegg's feet and asking themselves how leftists could support a Labour party that conducted an illegal war on Iraq and borrowed from their grandchildren to prop up parasitic banks.
Illimitus 1 year ago
@Illimitus The Tories supported the war on Iraq, and the LD's have formed a full coalition with them. They lose their right to criticise such things now. Their own policies will become intertwined with the Tories' in the minds of the electorate.The Tories would have been a smaller party in power, (yet no less stable), and the LD's, left free to criticise and expose their policies, now their hands are tied, and the only credible voice opposing them will be Labour. They have lost their voice.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
@Illimitus If I was a Tory I'd be trying my best to cover up the past and not keep brining it up.
IAMAPLANTPOT 1 year ago
Tories would have gotten in anyway... most voted for them.
We came in THIRD. What would you propose we do?
DracoSlashHarry 1 year ago
@DracoSlashHarry
Not go for power at any cost, perhaps? I don't buy this stability thing, as this may turn out to be anything but. People voted Lib-Dem for a variety of reasons, some believed the hyped up debates, gave Clegg a real chance to win. Others thought it a protest vote against Labour, while not allowing the Tories power, or that they weren't convinced that the Tories had changed. This is an unlikely alliance, therefore unfair to use those Lib-Dem votes this way. It is opportunistic.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
@onwebcameron The main goal is getting our policies through everything else is just semantics,
DracoSlashHarry 1 year ago
@DracoSlashHarry
Good luck with that then, I doubt the Tories will let them get much through. Now it is a real coalition though, they will also be forced into presenting objectionable Tory policies, as 'one voice'. Taking the inevitable blame and shame that will go with that.
Check out Vince Cable on my favourites. A good speech but can we believe a word the man says,now he is working for/with the 'Snake oil salesman' himself?
At best they will prolong and prop up a dreadful Tory regime.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
@DracoSlashHarry : Since Clegg very sportingly announced that the his fellow ex-posh public schoolboy Ca-Moron should have first shout, since his party had the most seats, what peculiar logic did he apply for himself, as the leader of the party with the LEAST seats, to not only share power with the party that most of his voters desperately wanted to keep OUT, but become deputy PM into the bargain?
Democrat my bottom.
G0IFI 1 year ago
C/LOL - Very, very funny :-) Is the "oh" from your Hart Beat animations?!
porkscratchin3000 1 year ago
Straight to the point, and so true.
G0IFI 1 year ago