Added: 4 years ago
From: azmorgan
Views: 19,785
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • some good videos my friend

  • dude shooting at 1:30 has horrible muzzle controle . looks like a 30 , but come on.

  • what the heck is with the stupid fake report on the gun at 1:30 - 1:43

  • who's the stupid cunt talking about "if you have to shoot em'.. shoot em' dead" but he needs to be 5 feet from a watermelon to hit it? fucking joke... that fool couldn't run a lap before passing out.

  • You would not want to get into a gunfight with robert boatman....he is as deadly as rob leatham or massad ayoob.

  • Rob Leatham is a competition shooter sponsored by Springfield, this guys is a drunk about to die of a heart attack... he's not a competition shooter, he sells books to dumbasses who can use a gun, funny but it makes money... i would destroy this old man with his ego... walk up behind him, shoot him and take his guns cause i know what he looks like, you see... i live in a place call the real world.

  • LOL! What an effin crock of crap, this guy recycles old wives tales and BS gun store myths and makes money off fools who have never even been in a fight since they got beat up in grade school by a girl. But, even snake oil salesman gotta make a living and there is a fool born every minute, and this guy is proof of that!

  • @marshallone It's the cigar... it gives him a bigger sense of authority.

  • Is this some kind of parody for SNL? Anyone who advocates shooting every time you draw needs to get out of the training business. I have drawn my gun dozens of times and not had to shoot, this information is not only wrong, it's down right stupid. And I have never had to draw on or shoot an armed watermelon. This information is POISON! If this idiot ever shoots anyone, this video could be used against him in court and he will LOSE.

    Moron.

  • what do you mean you had to draw you're weapon dozens of times? Were you just showing off, or were you drawing on those who were unarmed? If someone draws on are you gonna pull you're piece out and wait til his firearm cracks first? I don't know dude, either one of us or both of us are misinterpreting this video, You need to lighten up, honestly,

  • Firearms are used hundreds of times a day to stop criminals with the threat of deadly force (pointing a gun at them). Training to shoot your pistol every time you draw it is stupid. The threat of deadly physical force and the use of deadly physical force are hugely different things legally. Do some homework.

  • Do my homework, learning to fire as soon as you draw is probably the best practice you can do especially if someone has a gun pointed at you're ass. I guess muscle memory doesn't mean shit to you in a stressful situation, I'm sure you can acquire sight picture instantly when you rip that piece from you're waist band, I'm sure the momentum of drawing you're weapon won't affect you. Whatever, different points of view I guess.

  • How many gun fights have you been in? How many Police and others have you trained? How many times have YOU shot another person? Don't tell me, I know its ZERO and you are talking out your ass, cause you are just saying things you have read or think about. Well, if you want to train like a fool, then go ahead. We are talking deadly business here, so to hell with 'lightening up'. This idiot made a stupid statement that is WRONG. You can agree all you want, its still WRONG.

  • hahahaha...okay kid, I hope some asshole calls you're bluff one day...I'm sure the "dozens" of times you pulled you're weapon, you scared the shit out of them "criminals" and prevented a crime from happening...you go ahead and go around your state scaring shoplifters, I don't give a shit. The cops are their to fight crime, and if I have to Draw, that means my life or someone else is in danger of bodily harm and or even death...I don't go around playing vigilante like you do.

  • I'm done responding to you, go flirt to someone else for that much needed attention, I'm sure their is someone out their for you to argue with for the sake of arguing...ooh well, have fun doing what you're doing...as for me, I'm out.

  • Goodbye, wannabe.

  • ...

  • I thought you were done responding, yet here you are again. Why are you not out training all those who need your experience and insight on the fine art of gun fighting? You could show them a movie or play some first person shooting games and prove your are the bad ass gunslinger you fancy yourself.

  • ...

  • duh

  • ...

  • @dohcholliday It's called "reflexive fire" in Infantry combat terms. You don't use your sights at all- just draw and line up your slide or the barrel of your m4 carbine to your target.That's all,and it works.Don't go to the range and practice breathing and delicate trigger squeeze.Just practice rapid draw and double-tap ("controlled pair")as you line up the slide under the target without sights.That is what will closely simulate combat.You fight as you train. It worked for me in Iraq.

  • Comment removed

  • f u watermelons!!!! die! lol

  • I like this guy he cool

  • if ya gonna shoot, make sure you shoot em ded

  • does any one else notice how in each shot his cigar get bigger lol

  • holy crap it does ^^

  • Geez... Morgan: Are you shooting a Glock 36 here 3:11? Are you using the frangible ammo your dad is mentioning??

  • Wait... not at 3:11 but at 1:30. Is that a Glock 36? I'm trying to decide between a Glock 19 and a 36.

  • What is with the fireside chat vocal tones and cigar? ROFL ... just report the facts, save the image.

  • If mutually assured destruction works with nuclear weapons I can't see why it wouldn't work with gun violence.

    Who is going to try gun violence in a place where everyone has guns?

  • 3:11, I like that.

  • Good comments. Thanks.

  • It all depends on if it's a seedless variety or not. Those seeded variety melons are tough SOB's! ;)

  • hah what a joke frangible handgun ammo is almost as devastating as a shotgun at close range?! on a watermelon maybe ..

  • Man, I'm hungry for watermellon now!!

  • how would you make guns unavailable? making them illegal wouldn't do a thing. criminals would still have them, only the law abiding citizens wouldn't. Look at washington DC, handguns are illegal there and people still get shot.

  • A handgun is not enough to defend you if a city of rioters/looters are coming to destroy/burn your store or home, such as the L.A. Riots, or Katrina aftermath.

    The point you are close to is this: Firearms in lawful/responsible hands are an asset to the community, in the hands of the criminal/irresponsible is a liability. The problem is not the guns, but ensuring that they are kept in lawful/responsible hands. Here we presume people are lawful/responsible till their conduct proves otherwise.

  • Statisticly the UK has the same or more crime then the US. Yes we have fairly high murder rates, mostly being in low income areas of citys in the country(i.e. Detroit,L.A,Toledo,Flint,Atlan­ta,Chicago). Chicago Illinois being one of the worst, which is a non CCW state.All you really see are negative things on tv. They get their information from people who get their info from other people. Information changes from person to person. You never hear about good things like "citizen foils bank robbery"

  • or "student with CCW prevents school shooting from turning into a massacre". Guns dont kill people, people kill people. A firearm is a mechanical device. It does not fire on its own. Guns are similar to rocks in that they are objects that effect other objects from far away. Both can kill. Do you think that we should ban rocks too! Its animal nature to kill. We cant do anything about that. All we can do is protect ourselves. We learned long ago law enforcement wont protect us.

  • without the gun, someone would've gotten stabbed to death. and maybe if the victim exercised their 2nd amendment right instead of calling the cops for everything, the assailant would've gotten shot instead

  • But... There are guns in the US. The average citizen should have the right to keep and own firearms for protection against criminals who will always have guns in spite of the law. They can't effectively prevent jailed criminals from manufacturing weapons in a controlled environment. How do you suppose laws will prevent criminals on the street from getting them? Your logic is flawed, shallow and convoluted.

  • Comment removed

  • nice point i keep =p= talons and a backup mag of fmj. and always draw and fire , that is why you draw it .

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more