Added: 3 years ago
From: ubergossen
Views: 951
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Obviously, if I just take what you said about the teacher without assessing what she had done to YOU, I would think that UR the bad person, and that you're being TOO IRATIONAL.

  • When using random quotes, provide some background info of where that quote came from in the Qura'an (i.e: the story behind that quote).

    ex: if you have a fight with a teacher (she does something severely harmful to you) and you tell your friend "Don't ever approach teachers, for they are monsters & you'll always discovery treachery in them."

  • I wonder why Mein Kampf is the number 1 book across the arab world ?

  • The "game" is a good idea! 

  • islams prophet: Mohammed AL-Hitler says

    i have been made victorious with terror

  • Banning books ahhhhhh, not a good idea.

  • You know nothing of Islam. The Quran's divinity can not be related to anything. Im open to everyone's oppinion.... as long as its educated. The only way to educate yourself on the quran is to learn arabic and read it. Translating it can change the lines completly. Once you read it in arabic you can formulate a respectable opinion.

  • Are you saying the passages I took from the Qu'ran mean something different in their original language?

    Could you please explain what "They should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned" was supposed to mean?

    I think it's incredibly ironic that you're trying to defend the portrayal of Jews in the Quran with a name like "FcukIsreal".

    I, too, am very anti-Isreal, but probably for different reasons.

  • Why does danming israel have anything to do with jews? I never said anything anti-semetic. I am a semite.

    And yes, thats exactly what I'm saying. I speak arabic, please provide the numbers to that so called line, and I will provide you with an unbiased, clearer translation. Arabic, like all semetic languages can be very delecate when you translate. so again, give me the numbers and i'll provide a better translation, also, you should read whats before and after the line. thanks.

  • Sure, I'm actually really like to hear your translation. The passage I got is from 5:33

  • [5:33] The just retribution for those who fight GOD and His messenger, and commit horrendous crimes, is to be killed, or crucified, or to have their hands and feet cut off on alternate sides, or to be banished from the land. This is to humiliate them in this life, then they suffer a far worse retribution in the Hereafter.

    [5:34] Exempted are those who repent before you overcome them. You should know that GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

  • Thanks for your translation, I really appreciate it.

  • To explain these two lines. One calls for retribution against those who commit crimes to be put to death or made an example of. Canada had the death penalty and America still has it. This is no different. The Quran also goes to say that the sick ones, like those who commit mass genocide for example are to be humiliated for their gross crimes. Like hitler for example. Then the Quran gives them a chance to better themselves before any "strict" punishment is awarded. Its not ment for non-believers.

  • Its simply just a strict code to treat criminals of great crimes. It doesn't mean go around killing people who aren't muslim, if thats what you thought. Wouldnt you argue that if the allies had captured hitler they would have executed him in humiliation?

  • Personally I don't believe in pure punishment under any circumstance.

    No matter what someone does, they should try to be educated and rehabilitated, not punished. If it is completely impossible to reintegrate them into society, they should be kept in prison, not as punishment, but to protect society. State sponsored killing is lazy and also gives out the message that killing is okay.

  • @FcukIsrael What about Al-Tawbah 29 (9:29):"Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled." ?

  • @fetfet13 You need to read the entire chapter. It talks about IN TIMES OF WAR. If you are attacked god says fight back. Also saying that people who will attack you are those who have been described above. God also says to give them a chance at peace before war. This is nothing different from the way all leading democracies work.

  • @FcukIsrael I read it, and it is general, not in a specific case. Besides, it should tell you to avoid war, not what to do during war.

  • @fetfet13 Ofcourse the Quran teaches war in defense is the last option. Peace before war. However, if everyone had that attitude, there would be no war. But because war exists and God knows this, the Quran teaches muslims how to conduct themselves in times of war. Some examples are limiting fighting to just men, making sure women and children are safe, and not harming trees or any wildlife.

  • @FcukIsrael "Im open to everyone's oppinion.... as long as its educated" tell me was that joke intentional?

    .

    "The only way to educate yourself on the quran is to learn arabic and read it" who says? please give a reference to a Linguistics paper in a Peer reviewed journal that verifies that claim. Sounds more like Arab supremacism to me ie. "Arabic is a richer language than English because Arabic is a richer language than English" ie circular reasoning.

  • Comment removed

  • @DontBendOverForAllah its no joke. Would you be open to hiter's extermination opinions just because theyre opinions?

    Arabic is a semetic language. If you know anything about semetic languages, you should know translation is very delicate. One word in traditional arabic can have 7 different meanings. No one writes papers about arabic being the best way to understand the Quran-its almost common sense. Translations can add, take out, and manipulate the original. This is elementary, come on now.

  • @FcukIsrael 'One word in traditional arabic can have 7 different meanings' no different than any other language then. When a word can have different meanings it's context tells you which meaning applies, if you can't understand which meaning applies then you could not understand what was meant even if you knew Arabic which would make the Quran nonsense.

    .

    Logically therefore the claim you need to be fluent in Arabic in order to understand the Quran is either false or the Quran is nonsense.

  • @DontBendOverForAllah Exactly. You're right. "When a word can have different meanings it's context tells you which meaning applies". Translations are too often taken out of context. I said to fully understand the Quran as it is written, you need to read Arabic. Which is obvious, the Quran is written in Arabic. Therefore, by nature, any translation isn't going to be 100% accurate. Only the arabic original is.

  • @DontBendOverForAllah I don't see any logic in your reasoning. Are you arguing that the Quran is nonsense based on English translations? How can you judge something that is at best, a weak interpretation of the original? English and Arabic are very different. Also, let's put your theory to the test. Find 10 words in english that have 7 different meanings. Actually, I'll even settle for just one.

  • @FcukIsrael You are asking me to provide evidence? You are the one who needs to provide the evidence since you are the one who has made the assertion. This Arab supremicist argument is nonsense. I've never heard Christians claim the Bible can only be understood in the original Hebrew/Greek/Latin.

  • @DontBendOverForAllah I'll say this bluntly. I am not claiming that you need to be fluent in Arabic to understand the Quran. What I am claiming is that you need to be fluent in Arabic to understand the context. There are translations but they are not 100% and most translations state that on the very first page. So anyone using a respectable scientific method of critisism must accept the fact that an english translation is not identicle, therefore all outcomes are not as accurate as they can be.

  • @FcukIsrael According to Wafa Sultan, the English translations of the Koran are actually much milder than the original arabic.

  • @in3x That all depends on who is translating. Yeah, some are milder, and some are way off. The Quran is very descriptive when it comes to punishment in hell, thats usually what changes to become "milder".

  • most of you people demonstrate why the Quran should be banned in general. If you want the benefits of western society you have to accept to live by the moral standards that allowed society to function

  • The reason why so many films, books, and other literature are banned in the "free world" is because they usually represent, at least in part, a more rational and logical worldview than that which is provided by the state, media and society.

  • Jews control the West.

    Jews are using the West like a wrecking ball in the Middle East - while at the same time eviscerating the West itself. Brilliant.

  • "The Jew is the great master in lying, and lies and deception are his weapons in struggle"

    That is a good quote, Hitler really did understand the Jew well. He wasnt just some mad man that hated Jews for nothing other than being a bigot like he is portrayed in the media.

  • I think both Mein Kampf and the Quran are both fairly accurate on typical Jewish behavior.

  • Jews try to ban both, Books supporting Violence are 2 thumbs up for me.

  • in the bible ,first testament,sad alsow to stone people if they did somthing wrong,and destroy whole nations wife childeren or animals...

    but when jesus died the law whas changed and so came the seconde testament becaus jesus died for our sin,s there whas no need to stone people or killing at all..and what i think is that the radical islam is only using the first testament so basicly the first testament=qu,ran

  • The word of god is either true or not.You can not start to pick and chose which passages are still valid.

  • wrong...

    in the bible says

    that we dont have to pay for our sins caus jesus DIED for our sins

  • The old testament is the foundation of all the main religions.You spend half your bible studies on this book.How can you say its less relevant that the N.T.?Why was Jesus himself teaching from the old?

  • Islam is based on the Qur'an and not the O.T.,they are completely different books.Most Muslims have never even read the bible.

  • nearly all didn't read the bible

  • but what you didn,t say about geert wilders in the video is why he,s doing this

    for example...i live in holland right..

    and when im going to school or to the shop or what ever..

    i see moskee,s (moslim church)

    every where and you see alot of radical moslims scaring ,robbing beating

    people women child young or old ..

    and with that movie fitna he is saying YO STOP! do we want our country to be like morroco hes making people alert and i respect that because i see it and i dealed whith it

  • I only got one wrong, could be because I've read both books.

    If you ban all books that mention violence then about the only books you have on the shelf would some children's books and Buddhist texts.

  • haha yeah. Some other guy told me that the only religious book left would be the Kama Sutra.

  • Firstly id say tht shariah is an abolutely vile and inhumane system. BUT the main difference between what the Quran and Mein Kampf say is that when the Quran does NOT use the term "hood" commonly translated "Jews" AS A RACE TERM BUT AS THOSE PEOPLE WHO ADHERE TO A CERTAIN IDEOLOGY/RELIGION NAMELY JUDAISM. If you look up the OT youll find in there the most irrational, violent and inhumane commandments ever compared to which even the current Shariah practices look like a relief.

  • Although i 1st have to say tht shariah is a totally vile and inhuman system the main difference between what the Quran and Mein Kampf say is that when the Quran talks about CERTAIN Jews IT MEANS IT AS THOSE WHO FOLLOW A RELIGION/IDEOLOGY AND NOT AS A RACE! This is very important and may cause alot of confusion. In the Quran the term "hood" commonly translated as "Jews" DOES NOT REFER TO A RACE but people who ADHERE TO THT IDEOLOGY. Most modern Jews dont even follow the vile Old Testament...

  • what about splitting the 2nd (slightly more interesting) part from the first ? might be more interesting for the masses than your personal opinions ? ;)

  • Hmmmm, you're right

  • Wel said

  • Wel said

  • Boy, I wish you the best of luck. I guess, you wont be much popular in local muslim community. Nice video nonetheless, although little boring at the beginning.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more