if we could go back in time and change the history i wonder if there would be better relations with iran, creating peace and stability. friggin bush is just a buttfuker
You mean American Government. Do not state that it is America when it is not. The people would rather not be there, the soldiers would rather not be there, but out of patriotic duty we go. Politics is and has always been politics; never blame the citizens of a horrible political organization.
How is it patriotic to fight in a war which wasted $600 billion of Americans tax money? Yes the governments start the war, but its the soldiers that do the dirty job.
It would have been patriotic if America was attacked and these soldiers had joined to defend the country, not going all the way to Iraq, killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqis
Blind and ignorant to the truth has been an issue throughout all of mans existance. The troops are becoming mroe and more aware of the issue but many are more afraid of prison than being called unpatriotic. I can not fault them for that and I do understand them, it will take military leaders within to stand up right and state that the actions of the past and present are unfair and unjustified and then the people need to stand behind them to clean this up.
Southernpersian, I agree with u. US just came there to get the oil from Turmenistan and build their oil pipeline through Afghanistan and Pakistan. Then, China won't get it and they will control the region. They have understood that power is shifting towards East and they just can't bear it!!!
As I read the warmongering comments from you dip-shit americans I have to laugh..this economic collapse that is currently underway is going to bring your empire building to a stop...soon you will be the beggars of the world and will not have the ability to wreak distruction world wide anymore...enjoy the FEMA camps assholes..martial law is only months away. My condolences to the good ppl in America that your countrymen are such fuckwads, but ya should have stopped them when ya had the chance
the iranian goverment are NOT terroists u fool, that what FOX news WANTS you to beleive... Alot of you need to grow up and stop listening to properganda and stop arab-slaying and get down to the business of human advancment not human wipeout.
Sending troops into Afghanistan to stabilize the region with American supervision is not helping? Presiden Karzai argued Iran is "a helper and a solution".
Pure typical brainwashed American... US bombed Afghanistan for months without succeedng to kill the taliban it was Iran who gave Intelligence on wher ethe taliban was located during the Khatami presidency go do some ressearch before you strech your fingers on your keyboard
Blowback. We will be in this for ever. The Federal reserve loves it, American Government loves it, Fox News loves it and military contractors like Haliburton love it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It is not widely known. Only a few inner circle people are aware that Iran, while not agreeing with Wahhabism, contracted with Osama bin Laden to attack their common enemy, the United States. Iran provided money and moral support for the effort to bring down the world trade center. The perpetrators were all homosexual and had been excommunicated from their families. Money changed hands, and the perps were hoping for some kind of redemption from Allah, stemming from their jihad.
I don't think we agree much on the US and the rest of the world.
If you look into any conflict entered into by the US during my not inconsiderable lifetime, you wil discover that the US has been a force for good in the world. Look at the people we have fought against. They are the forces for bad in the world.
we ended allendes socialistic tendencies...and in the black and white world, to us, socialism = bad. but we also introduced a fascist dictator who killed thousands and was later convincted of war crimes
allende wanted the chilean people, not just US companies, to profit from their countrys resources. is that a force for bad? whereas pinochet was a pawn for US corporate interests...for for good? was allendes socialism worse than pinochets fascism?
I haven't studied much about Pinochet, or about specifics in many places where the US intervened. Generally, I have believed that the choice was made to go against anyone who was against the US, and to ally ourselves with anyone who embraced, more closely, the US policies. It was usually communism versus capitalism. Freedom and democracy versus despotism and authoritarianism.
"It was usually communism versus capitalism. Freedom and democracy versus despotism and authoritarianism."
TAMARLANE, as a semiotician you should understand the power of labels and recognize the false dichotomy in that statement. Allende, a freely-elected and democratic Marxist was violently overthrown and replaced with Pinochet, a authoritarian laissez-faire capitalist. This happened repeatedly in the Cold War, with Sukarno-->Suharto in Indonesia and Mossadegh-->Reza Shah in Iran, et al.
In each of those cases the US felt that we were threatened by communism. The big difference between communism and secular democracy, between central planning and capitalism was this"
Communism woujd arem the people on one side, promise them a better life if they won.
Democracy would arm the other side and promise them a better life if they won.
At war's end. Communism took the guns away and eliminated those who were too militant.
Democracy put everyone to work and set up a company store.
Terrorist = One that engages in acts or an act of terrorism.
I think this fits the bill for Americans. Since Americas invasion and ethnic cleansing of the indigenous people that lived there, the American Indians and the land and resource grab from the white invaders. Scumbag, lying, deceitful nature is in the DNA.
You know they only killed so many American Indians to protect themselves, now hasn't that line worked well over the years.
the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideologica
unlawful violence defines itself. That is to say violence that is unlawful. Beyond that, you are on your own. What do you think unlawful violence means?
I would work to enforce our laws. If I lost my life as a result, sillier things have happened. Happens every day in America and across the world. Some people ose their lives over a pair of Air Jordan basketball shoes, some over a designer jacket.
You're changing the subject. You said that a law is valid if the citizens are willing to die for it. But you only said you would work to enforce a no beer on Sundays law, which I guess means you wouldn't die to keep the law in place. Does that make that law invalid?
How can validity of law come from willingness of the citizens willing to die for a law's validity when a law prohibiting beer sales on Sundays is obviously valid yet no one is willing to die for it?
Like the boston tea party, the alamo; the herding of africans to america as cattle; the rape and pillaging of an indigenous populations land and its women. You can't execute terrorism as only effective and valid in 1 time period it must be effectively defined to accommodate all time periods. We are terrorists and the best at it. Your comprehension of simple black and white ethics and morals is questionable based on your ability to define something as simple as violence against a blind target.
It is the Ayatollahs and their desire to impose Sharia law on the entire world. It is those Iranians that engage in terrorism. Those who kill and support those who kill innocent people in Lebanon, in Palestine, in Iraq. Those who support the Ayatollahs, death to them.
Iranian politics is all about whatever the Ayatollah Khameini says it is about. The "sarcasm" must be approved by the Ayatollah. Once they almost decided not to have the parades chanting Death to America. Out of fear of reprisals I suppose.
im so glad we have a democrat as the new president caz another republicfuck would just fuck things up even more and its always possible to have things fucked up even more
GreatSatan1; death to you and your fucking terrorist country , mother fucker !! you can't stand it ...HUH ? loser all your american dreams and plans about mid E are over (gone)(finitoo) including israel ! now GO find a job asshole !
America gets tired of Iran referring to America as the Great Satan. America gets tired of the demonstrations, government sponsored, in Iran chanting Death to America.
One little "DFeath to Iran" and you are bent out of shape there. And you say I can't stand it? LOL
Sadly, this is true. Countries need to realize that any policy towards that country by the US will be ultimately for gaining or maintaining political and economic power at home, the fate of the foreign country be damned. No country has supported and protected more dictators against their own people.... when convenient. Think of Central America, South America, SE Asia, Central Europe, Pacific, Central and Middle East and Africa. There were many Shah's, Noriega's and Marcos', Saddam's, etc.
You are correct, sort of. It ended with George W. Bush. Bush quit supporting the "lesser of two evils" dictatorships and the results have been disastrous for all concerned.
A few good reasons: '52 US o'threw elected gov't/installed murderous US puppet Shah; refused return Shah to stand trial; backed Iraq war on Iran; USS Vincennes shoot-down of Iran airliner (Capt given medal/promo'n by Bush41); Congress'l resol'n/Regime Change; after Bush/Axis of Evil, still put evryting on table/No US respone; Iran pres killed by rt-wng extrem'ts/Not condemned by US; US-Israeli threats; False claims of threats to Israel; Claim nuke prog/Impose sanctions. This is the Short list.
By Barack Obama choosing Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State he squandered World opinion just like Bush did after 9/11. America will be fighting imaginary enemies and ducking sniper fire from Iran for the next four years.
I think he's a Yank, actually. You might have him confused with Christopher Hitchens, who's grown to have a slight resemblance to Blankley as the years and the whiskey have taken their toll.
He didn't said that, he said by calling Iran a country part of the axis of evil when they provided help in Afghanistan, completly different things u stupid moron.
you're a idiot. After asking Iran for help on the war on terror and recieving that help you idiots repaid them by claiming they were members of the axis of evil and starting talking all this shit about how dangerous they'd be if they established a nuculear program even though they had one in the 70's and dismantled it BY THEMSELVE'S due to all of the oil their country produces. What kind of drugs are YOU on?
u gotthejack you go on every video i have ever watched spamming bs and trying to start shit. Forgive me if I could care less what you think. If I spent a minute taking you serious it would be the worst mistake of my life.
Iran is more powerful and dangerous then it ever was because of Bush and if you dont know that then you are a moron and nobody can help you.
Oh is that so you warmonger? we'll who has Iran EVER attacked? You give me one example of Iran ever attacking another country weather preemtively or in self defense and I will shut up, other wise FUCK OFF YOU TWAT!
yes it is so moron. I wonder why you try and change the subject. Probably because you realize you look like a dumb pos trying to argue against reality.
What do I expect of you? nothing. Nothing more then to try and use my response to your idiocracy as an opportunity for you to regurgitate more bs talking points you sucked down and swallowed.
lol...what a fucking idiot. You claim it is so yet you failed to answer the question. That's the problem with you zionist dogs. Your intelligence level is too low to argue with someone who is aware of all of the facts, so instead you run away from the question and follow it with another question which makes absolutely no sense. Israel is the scum of the earth. That little piece of shit country has been able to do whatever it wants by hiding behind the holocaust which was caused by zionist jews.
Who the fuck is talking about Israel and zionists besides you? Nobody. yet you accuse me of trying 2 change the subject while you try and suggest like the dumb fuck you are that Bush was bad for Iran.
You are a repugnant person and nothing besides the lowest of the low.
Lets just b plain. Anybody who reads what both u & I wrote will know how big of an orwellian pos bigot u r. Nothing 2 argue, no debate.
keep signing in on your different accounts to spam videos.
Thanks for making it obvious how biased you are. Can't even get basic facts str8 before you turn to spew and regurgitate your bullshit hate and propaganda.
You are a shame on humanity, a disgrace to life and a waste of skin. piss off wanker
The fact remains is that if the war on terror had anything to do with combatting Islamic extremism they would have gone for the number one funder and producer of it. Saudi Arabia.
this is just blow back from the Iran-Contra scandal and to make matters worse the united states wants to make american citizens complicicent in double crossing iran and drawing them into a war just like they did to iraq and bin laden.
In bushs defense Iran was put into the axis of evil because he needed 3 countries and thought no one would really care if he threw them in there, if he only had two countries it would be like the bar of evil and who is scared of that?
The real problem with Bush's "Axis" was that it was made up of three countries that had nothing whatsoever to do with each other. The World War II Axis(Germany-Japan-Italy 'til 43)was actually a genuine military alliance with a coordinated strategy for trying to take over the world. Bush's "Axis" was three completely disconnected countries with unpleasant leaders.
They have in common that they are Godless Terrorists!
You are not getting the point, we must define our world view with ignorant generalisations and moral words like 'evil'. You're sounding like a pinko! :P
(Never mind, there've been tons of 'em-almost all religions have produced them save for the Buddhists and the Quakers).
2)I didn't didn't say those countries had nothing in common. What I did say, and what is unchallengeable true, is that they weren't in any sense whatsoever allied with each other(and it wouldn't have been possible for a hardline communist country like North Korea, which is officially athiest, to ally with two Islamic regimes.)
WOW,Kennburch haven't you been listening? Iran helped us in afgan who got us in sep 11, and then rewarded them by calling them Axis of Evil. So how is Iran anything of Axis of Evil? North Korea didn't work with any of the 2 islamic regimes, they care called the hermit kingdom for a reason! President Bush saw them as a "threat," and thats why he called 3 nations the new axis of evil. DUDE do more research or just don't write at all.
I was attacking the "Axis of Evil" thing, not agreeing with it. I agree with all you said in that post. I know Bush saw them as a threat(or that at least it was convenient for him to say he saw them that way)but the term "axis" involves an actual alliance, like Germany and Japan had or at least like the Legion of Doom under Lex Luthor.
There was no coordinated plan to take over the world between Germany-Italy and Japan. Japan was not involved with European objectives and were mostly concerned with its own sphere of influence in Asia countered by the British and US. The US had blockaded Japanese trade routes and cut off oil from S.E. Asia, which was considered an act of war, well before Pearl Harbor. There were no plans to extend control beyond its region. The US-Japan war was an extension of the 2nd China war.
These points were brought up in 2003 and viciously shouted down with cat calls of "traitor" and "coward". The media manipulation by the Neo-Nazis was breath taking in its ruthless efficiency and power. Any questioning of their plans was quickly and loudly branded as betraying our soldiers and the dead victims of 9/11. It was the perfect storm for America. Corruption, incompetence and a threat.
I wonder how Cheney liked lighting a cigar with the Constitution?
Indeed we did undermine Iran. And as a result, we're in the worst situation militarily since the Vietnam War and economically since the Great Depression. That's what happens when you put incompetent people like George Bush in office. No one wanted to talk about him having Bin Laden in his home sipping tea with him. But they're quick to pin Obama to palling around with terrorists not stating the fact that the old man is simply a Professor at a University now. lol typical Republicans. It so funnny
Amen. Responding to 911 as the crime it was, and investigating & prosecuting it in criminal terms wasn't macho enough.
So we get 2 quagmires, the trumped-up 2nd one being what Stiglitz calls the 3 trillion dollar war. Not to mention 2 terms for the biggest fool to ever hold the office w/ a refried Reagan junta of cronies in tow. Brilliant.
And the Dems don't have the stones to investigate the crimes (almost literally the least the US populace deserves -- a setting straight of the record).
if we could go back in time and change the history i wonder if there would be better relations with iran, creating peace and stability. friggin bush is just a buttfuker
chitowngee 1 year ago
America must leave the region and stop its imperial agenda.
southernpersian 2 years ago 5
You mean American Government. Do not state that it is America when it is not. The people would rather not be there, the soldiers would rather not be there, but out of patriotic duty we go. Politics is and has always been politics; never blame the citizens of a horrible political organization.
IKLIPTIC 2 years ago 2
How is it patriotic to fight in a war which wasted $600 billion of Americans tax money? Yes the governments start the war, but its the soldiers that do the dirty job.
It would have been patriotic if America was attacked and these soldiers had joined to defend the country, not going all the way to Iraq, killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqis
and also a few thousands of Americans
P3RSIANpinoy 2 years ago 2
Blind and ignorant to the truth has been an issue throughout all of mans existance. The troops are becoming mroe and more aware of the issue but many are more afraid of prison than being called unpatriotic. I can not fault them for that and I do understand them, it will take military leaders within to stand up right and state that the actions of the past and present are unfair and unjustified and then the people need to stand behind them to clean this up.
IKLIPTIC 2 years ago
Southernpersian, I agree with u. US just came there to get the oil from Turmenistan and build their oil pipeline through Afghanistan and Pakistan. Then, China won't get it and they will control the region. They have understood that power is shifting towards East and they just can't bear it!!!
EastboyS83 2 years ago 2
As I read the warmongering comments from you dip-shit americans I have to laugh..this economic collapse that is currently underway is going to bring your empire building to a stop...soon you will be the beggars of the world and will not have the ability to wreak distruction world wide anymore...enjoy the FEMA camps assholes..martial law is only months away. My condolences to the good ppl in America that your countrymen are such fuckwads, but ya should have stopped them when ya had the chance
000deadcalm000 2 years ago 3
the iranian goverment are NOT terroists u fool, that what FOX news WANTS you to beleive... Alot of you need to grow up and stop listening to properganda and stop arab-slaying and get down to the business of human advancment not human wipeout.
ADFcope 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Iran never helped us, retard.
JohnWoo 2 years ago
Sending troops into Afghanistan to stabilize the region with American supervision is not helping? Presiden Karzai argued Iran is "a helper and a solution".
Stick to your Faux News.
99999999988888888 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Iranian government are terrorists that's all I need to know.
JohnWoo 2 years ago
Pure typical brainwashed American... US bombed Afghanistan for months without succeedng to kill the taliban it was Iran who gave Intelligence on wher ethe taliban was located during the Khatami presidency go do some ressearch before you strech your fingers on your keyboard
OmgItsNikoZ 2 years ago 4
Blowback. We will be in this for ever. The Federal reserve loves it, American Government loves it, Fox News loves it and military contractors like Haliburton love it.
kaduisaui 2 years ago 2
agreed
pipeing 3 years ago
Im so fucking sick of Repubs takling about bombing people so passively - Like their kids' lives arent worth what our kids' lives are worth.
ILoveGoodFellas 3 years ago 11
The 1st guy who speaks is Tony Blankley. You people are totally confused. Watch John McLaughlin. Tony is always on his show.
074August 3 years ago
Stupid, Israel was responsible for 9/11 not Afhganistan, not Iran. Israel is the true world power.
dixon36 3 years ago
fuck you mother fuckers .........you dont even know who did 9 11 ,,go fuck your self ,,and shit in ur pants for one dollar ,,you idiots
manilaymanilay 3 years ago 2
It was Iran.
DEATH TO IRAN
GreatSatan1 3 years ago
you are sucha a silly person ,,
manilaymanilay 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It is not widely known. Only a few inner circle people are aware that Iran, while not agreeing with Wahhabism, contracted with Osama bin Laden to attack their common enemy, the United States. Iran provided money and moral support for the effort to bring down the world trade center. The perpetrators were all homosexual and had been excommunicated from their families. Money changed hands, and the perps were hoping for some kind of redemption from Allah, stemming from their jihad.
GreatSatan1 3 years ago
I hope your being sarcastic here otherwise your the dumbest fuck I have seen in a while
MySP00NisTooBIG 3 years ago 2
Who attacked us? We are all being played.
9/11 was an inside job! Wake up and look at the evidence.
Start at ae911truthdotorg look at the evidence. Don't believe what your told by the controlled major media.They have dropped the ball big time.
This is not going away till all the questions are answered and the victims and their families find justice.
4Freedomrider 3 years ago
THIS.
lightbringerrr 3 years ago
absolutely true
oelhayek 3 years ago
america screwed pakistan and iran after it helped them 0 so what else is new ??
xanderkhaan 3 years ago 2
blankley is such a pos
mcalien24 3 years ago
I like your scotch. It is my preferred drink.
I don't think we agree much on the US and the rest of the world.
If you look into any conflict entered into by the US during my not inconsiderable lifetime, you wil discover that the US has been a force for good in the world. Look at the people we have fought against. They are the forces for bad in the world.
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
i know we dont agree on a lot...ive seen ur comments before and you may have seen mine.
i think one of the main disagreements we would have is ur compartmentalizing nations and their actions into categories of good and bad.
i dont think the world is that black and white.
and i know that not all of our actions have been virtuous, and some even with malicious intent.
i think of chile...9/11/1973...when we installed pinochet, as we knew he would conform to our economic principles....
mcalien24 3 years ago
we ended allendes socialistic tendencies...and in the black and white world, to us, socialism = bad. but we also introduced a fascist dictator who killed thousands and was later convincted of war crimes
allende wanted the chilean people, not just US companies, to profit from their countrys resources. is that a force for bad? whereas pinochet was a pawn for US corporate interests...for for good? was allendes socialism worse than pinochets fascism?
similarities can be found in most US endeavors
mcalien24 3 years ago
and in the case of pinochet...what is good for the US is not always good for the rest of the world.
If we wanna talk about good and bad...Its good that our companies got sweeter deals...its bad that the chilean people had to suffer for it.
but the world is not that black and white. global and not just national utilitarian considerations are needed.
mcalien24 3 years ago 2
I haven't studied much about Pinochet, or about specifics in many places where the US intervened. Generally, I have believed that the choice was made to go against anyone who was against the US, and to ally ourselves with anyone who embraced, more closely, the US policies. It was usually communism versus capitalism. Freedom and democracy versus despotism and authoritarianism.
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
"It was usually communism versus capitalism. Freedom and democracy versus despotism and authoritarianism."
TAMARLANE, as a semiotician you should understand the power of labels and recognize the false dichotomy in that statement. Allende, a freely-elected and democratic Marxist was violently overthrown and replaced with Pinochet, a authoritarian laissez-faire capitalist. This happened repeatedly in the Cold War, with Sukarno-->Suharto in Indonesia and Mossadegh-->Reza Shah in Iran, et al.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
In each of those cases the US felt that we were threatened by communism. The big difference between communism and secular democracy, between central planning and capitalism was this"
Communism woujd arem the people on one side, promise them a better life if they won.
Democracy would arm the other side and promise them a better life if they won.
At war's end. Communism took the guns away and eliminated those who were too militant.
Democracy put everyone to work and set up a company store.
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
CRAP
Tcheuchter1 3 years ago
who pays the taxes that pays for the weapons?
Apathy is not an excuse for genocide.
pigfister 3 years ago
Do you pay taxes?
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
America global terrorists just ask: Argentina, Afghanistan, Chile, Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Columbia, Ecuador, Venezuela, Panama, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, St Kitts, Grenada, Indonesia, Cuba, Angola, Namibia, South Africa, Lesotho(Lesoto), Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Kongo, Nigiria, Burkina Faso, Liberia, Western Sahara, Lybia, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Yemin, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Achaea, Cambodia, East Timor, laos, The Philippines.
pigfister 3 years ago
Your definition of terrorist is defective.
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
Terrorist = One that engages in acts or an act of terrorism.
I think this fits the bill for Americans. Since Americas invasion and ethnic cleansing of the indigenous people that lived there, the American Indians and the land and resource grab from the white invaders. Scumbag, lying, deceitful nature is in the DNA.
You know they only killed so many American Indians to protect themselves, now hasn't that line worked well over the years.
Google "Project for the New American Century"
pigfister 3 years ago
My preferred definition of terrorism is:
the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideologica
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
unlawful violence? what do you mean by unlawful violence...
even in your definition...the US, Israel, and any so called "terrorist organization" fall into the category of terrorist.
But i bet you dont think the US and Israel are guilty of terrorism do you?
mcalien24 3 years ago
unlawful violence defines itself. That is to say violence that is unlawful. Beyond that, you are on your own. What do you think unlawful violence means?
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
try not to use the word your defining in ur definition.
i think i know what u really mean by it...that is to say that what the US does is always lawful.
mcalien24 3 years ago
What makes a law valid?
d3p3ch3mod3 3 years ago
When the people anywhere enact laws that they will defend with their lives, then that law is valid. For them.
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
Would you die to keep a law in place that prohibits beer sales on Sundays?
Are those laws invalid when an establishment is fined for selling beers on Sunday?
d3p3ch3mod3 3 years ago
I would work to enforce our laws. If I lost my life as a result, sillier things have happened. Happens every day in America and across the world. Some people ose their lives over a pair of Air Jordan basketball shoes, some over a designer jacket.
What about you?
Are you a scofflaw?
TAMARLANE 3 years ago 2
You're changing the subject. You said that a law is valid if the citizens are willing to die for it. But you only said you would work to enforce a no beer on Sundays law, which I guess means you wouldn't die to keep the law in place. Does that make that law invalid?
d3p3ch3mod3 3 years ago
No, I didn't change the subject. Mine was a complete answer.
Are you a scofflaw?
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
Yes you did and you're trying to again lol.
How can validity of law come from willingness of the citizens willing to die for a law's validity when a law prohibiting beer sales on Sundays is obviously valid yet no one is willing to die for it?
d3p3ch3mod3 3 years ago
r u A sCOFFLAW?
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
sounds like America to me. sadly.
and we call ourselves "civilized"? pssshh
we have a long way to go.
m333tt 3 years ago
Like the boston tea party, the alamo; the herding of africans to america as cattle; the rape and pillaging of an indigenous populations land and its women. You can't execute terrorism as only effective and valid in 1 time period it must be effectively defined to accommodate all time periods. We are terrorists and the best at it. Your comprehension of simple black and white ethics and morals is questionable based on your ability to define something as simple as violence against a blind target.
IKLIPTIC 2 years ago
It is the Ayatollahs and their desire to impose Sharia law on the entire world. It is those Iranians that engage in terrorism. Those who kill and support those who kill innocent people in Lebanon, in Palestine, in Iraq. Those who support the Ayatollahs, death to them.
GreatSatan1 3 years ago
Yes, you understand a lot about Middle Eastern and Iranian politics *sarcasm*
Mahdavi1990 3 years ago
Iranian politics is all about whatever the Ayatollah Khameini says it is about. The "sarcasm" must be approved by the Ayatollah. Once they almost decided not to have the parades chanting Death to America. Out of fear of reprisals I suppose.
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
Actually, Saudis were the most dominant group among the 9/11 terrorists. not one of them was Iranian, or palestinian.
cpr612001 3 years ago 2
True.
So?
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
It's despicable how Arabs and Zionists are doing their best to block a rapprochement between US and IRAN.
keep trying idiots !
HamNaphas 3 years ago
u people must have peanuts for brains..this is a waste of time.
daderone 3 years ago
Iran is not the enemy here us is running out of ideas so now they are blaming Iran
bangziad 3 years ago
How have Iranians harmed America or Britain? I think the harming and lying is one-sided.
Perc3ptive 3 years ago
iran will smoke you
eskatira 3 years ago
debate? what debate? US fucked up, period.
Okay, okay, who ever voted for Bush fucked up. Thats fair to say.
gizurix 3 years ago 4
LOL it's funny to watch these americans.
They're like mice in a maze looking for cheese.
but the mice are top leaders and the cheese is complete destruction.
ubamilitary 3 years ago
i hear british columbia is nice...
Beastwheat 3 years ago
Better than the US
ubamilitary 3 years ago
Nothing to do in BC except eavesdrop on the US.
Kibutzing is large is BC. Tutsemahas run rampant in BC.
GreatSatan1 3 years ago
I really don't get it
ubamilitary 3 years ago
way too much hate in this world....
Ingaj11 3 years ago 3
im so glad we have a democrat as the new president caz another republicfuck would just fuck things up even more and its always possible to have things fucked up even more
kazooga1234 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
DEATH TO IRAN
GreatSatan1 3 years ago
aww death to no one sweety
4dm1n15t0r 3 years ago
FUCK YOU
jamed2catch 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LOL
DEATH TO IRAN
GreatSatan1 3 years ago
eat shit faggot,
persiansownyourface 3 years ago
LoL
DeAtH tO IrAn
GreatSatan1 3 years ago
GreatSatan1; death to you and your fucking terrorist country , mother fucker !! you can't stand it ...HUH ? loser all your american dreams and plans about mid E are over (gone)(finitoo) including israel ! now GO find a job asshole !
artin74 3 years ago
America gets tired of Iran referring to America as the Great Satan. America gets tired of the demonstrations, government sponsored, in Iran chanting Death to America.
One little "DFeath to Iran" and you are bent out of shape there. And you say I can't stand it? LOL
D
GreatSatan1 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dude everyone wants a piece of the yam(west)!
We have the most liberal country...And thats what they want!Its anti-christ...
intelegens 3 years ago
please tell me you didn't just claim that the US was the most liberal country...
meanreus 3 years ago
Bush and his dumb friends have ruined this country.
nevar00 3 years ago 7
הפגז את ישראל
guaii 3 years ago
People do a quick test:
Go on the Google translate tool and translate from English to Hebrew:
"I shit on Israel"
Then translate the Hebrew translation back to English and you will have a big suprise...
Then do this with any other countries...
medaa25 3 years ago
كنت الخراء على نفسك
daderone 3 years ago
"that is the debate of 2003"
the fat fuck doesn't understand that the war is STILL going on and thus the "debate" (if you can even call it that) is still GOING ON. Fat fuck
USAWorseThanHitler 3 years ago
The US has no limits of its hypocracy.
faithlessimage 3 years ago
Most of the Iranian young people were very pro-Western until Bush started his crap.
DillonX 3 years ago 3
i have been saying this since 2004
DUGLESSM 3 years ago
who needs a friend like america it's like a good doggy and loyal companion one day then eats the face of your children the next!.
andeyejah 3 years ago 5
Sadly, this is true. Countries need to realize that any policy towards that country by the US will be ultimately for gaining or maintaining political and economic power at home, the fate of the foreign country be damned. No country has supported and protected more dictators against their own people.... when convenient. Think of Central America, South America, SE Asia, Central Europe, Pacific, Central and Middle East and Africa. There were many Shah's, Noriega's and Marcos', Saddam's, etc.
km6xz 3 years ago
You are correct, sort of. It ended with George W. Bush. Bush quit supporting the "lesser of two evils" dictatorships and the results have been disastrous for all concerned.
GreatSatan1 3 years ago
That's why Iran hates US.
CommonSense0822 3 years ago
A few good reasons: '52 US o'threw elected gov't/installed murderous US puppet Shah; refused return Shah to stand trial; backed Iraq war on Iran; USS Vincennes shoot-down of Iran airliner (Capt given medal/promo'n by Bush41); Congress'l resol'n/Regime Change; after Bush/Axis of Evil, still put evryting on table/No US respone; Iran pres killed by rt-wng extrem'ts/Not condemned by US; US-Israeli threats; False claims of threats to Israel; Claim nuke prog/Impose sanctions. This is the Short list.
Nutrino2179 3 years ago
I hate neo cons fuck them up their ignorant anuses..
RAPMONSTAR 3 years ago
Can I fuck you up your presumably non-ignorant anus?
flamablesteve 3 years ago
'Can I fuck you up your presumably non-ignorant anus?'
WTF?
ZingZee123456789 3 years ago
thinking the same thing.. you beat me to the draw
betterlife4us 3 years ago
By Barack Obama choosing Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State he squandered World opinion just like Bush did after 9/11. America will be fighting imaginary enemies and ducking sniper fire from Iran for the next four years.
WashMitt 3 years ago
Lol, I highly doubt that.
Yes, Hillary is the Secratary of State but you seem to forget that BARACK OBAMA IS THE PRESIDENT.
BARACK OBAMA (not Clinton) will be the architect of this countries (NEW AND IMPROVED..hopefully) foriegn policy. Clinton will just enforce it.
ZingZee123456789 3 years ago
Let Iran get their bomb and the world get rid of the occupying entity of Israel and the 90% of the Jews who agree with the massacres in Palestine.
medaa25 3 years ago
you are a repugnant person
daderone 3 years ago
אני חרא על יהודים
medaa25 3 years ago
كنت الخراء على نفسك
daderone 3 years ago
לעזאזל עם יהודים!
Burn in hell
medaa25 3 years ago
JA kladiti ćete uživati igranje s vašim fecal matter prljave fašist svinja. Vi: život = znoj: runjave loptice
لا اعتقد ان في جهنم
daderone 3 years ago
Saddam was in Iraq, not Afghanistan retard.
abach123 3 years ago
Iran > USA
WKaliber1 3 years ago
That Tony Blankley. . . One of the very worst British exports.
citizenkong 3 years ago 3
I think he's a Yank, actually. You might have him confused with Christopher Hitchens, who's grown to have a slight resemblance to Blankley as the years and the whiskey have taken their toll.
KennBurch 3 years ago
Anthony Tony Blankley (born 1948 in London, United Kingdom)
It's hard to keep track of all the players.
Although I completely disagree with him most of the time, he is one of the more thoughtful conservatives.
citizenkong 3 years ago
I'll be damned. I thought he was Yank by birth. I stand corrected.
KennBurch 3 years ago
Cheers!
citizenkong 3 years ago
more like the "asses of evil"
and that would be the outgoing administration.
earthmother 3 years ago
They only became an "axis of evil" country AFTER they threatened to convert USD holdings to URO. Same for all the "axis of evil" countries.
HEYBUDD 3 years ago 4
A lot of people don't realize that.
Aaimah 3 years ago
lol we underminded Iran by getting rid of Saddam. lmao. what a joke. like Bush has been so horrible for iran. what kind of drugs are these people on?
daderone 3 years ago
He didn't said that, he said by calling Iran a country part of the axis of evil when they provided help in Afghanistan, completly different things u stupid moron.
doobtribe 3 years ago
you're a idiot. After asking Iran for help on the war on terror and recieving that help you idiots repaid them by claiming they were members of the axis of evil and starting talking all this shit about how dangerous they'd be if they established a nuculear program even though they had one in the 70's and dismantled it BY THEMSELVE'S due to all of the oil their country produces. What kind of drugs are YOU on?
UGOTDAJACK 3 years ago
u gotthejack you go on every video i have ever watched spamming bs and trying to start shit. Forgive me if I could care less what you think. If I spent a minute taking you serious it would be the worst mistake of my life.
Iran is more powerful and dangerous then it ever was because of Bush and if you dont know that then you are a moron and nobody can help you.
daderone 3 years ago
Oh is that so you warmonger? we'll who has Iran EVER attacked? You give me one example of Iran ever attacking another country weather preemtively or in self defense and I will shut up, other wise FUCK OFF YOU TWAT!
UGOTDAJACK 3 years ago
yes it is so moron. I wonder why you try and change the subject. Probably because you realize you look like a dumb pos trying to argue against reality.
What do I expect of you? nothing. Nothing more then to try and use my response to your idiocracy as an opportunity for you to regurgitate more bs talking points you sucked down and swallowed.
daderone 3 years ago
lol...what a fucking idiot. You claim it is so yet you failed to answer the question. That's the problem with you zionist dogs. Your intelligence level is too low to argue with someone who is aware of all of the facts, so instead you run away from the question and follow it with another question which makes absolutely no sense. Israel is the scum of the earth. That little piece of shit country has been able to do whatever it wants by hiding behind the holocaust which was caused by zionist jews.
UGOTDAJACK 3 years ago
i agree
USAWorseThanHitler 3 years ago
answer nothing you dumb fuck.
You are such a piece of shit its not even funny.
Who the fuck is talking about Israel and zionists besides you? Nobody. yet you accuse me of trying 2 change the subject while you try and suggest like the dumb fuck you are that Bush was bad for Iran.
You are a repugnant person and nothing besides the lowest of the low.
Lets just b plain. Anybody who reads what both u & I wrote will know how big of an orwellian pos bigot u r. Nothing 2 argue, no debate.
daderone 3 years ago
keep signing in on your different accounts to spam videos.
Thanks for making it obvious how biased you are. Can't even get basic facts str8 before you turn to spew and regurgitate your bullshit hate and propaganda.
You are a shame on humanity, a disgrace to life and a waste of skin. piss off wanker
daderone 3 years ago
Is that your answer for an reasonable question?
km6xz 3 years ago
what reasonable question would that be? I don't see you asking me anything.
Why u think Iran has been hurt by Bush too?
Saddam woulda smacked around Ahmadinejad like a little girl for acting the way he is, he should be kissing our collective ass.
daderone 3 years ago
Blankly is human garbage.....he peddles that BS because it puts food in his fat belly.
texan176 3 years ago
Seriously Saudi Arabia is much more extremist than Iran.
The only difference is that Iran hasn't pumped money into the Bush familiy
qanazir 3 years ago 13
Nail that SOB with SHOE.
chewbaca1989 3 years ago 4
I don't know any of these "intellectuals", the Necons, but if I see one, POW! I'm going shoe the son of a bitch.
chewbaca1989 3 years ago 3
Blankley is just another neoconservative talking points parrot who is fading from relevance. I'm surprised he still gets airtime.
getplaning 3 years ago 5
The fact remains is that if the war on terror had anything to do with combatting Islamic extremism they would have gone for the number one funder and producer of it. Saudi Arabia.
Marksism123 3 years ago 6
exactly.
jakob0815 3 years ago
"It's the debate of 2003"
Thats all these bitch motherfuckers can come up with after causing so much death and destruction during these past 8 years.
Ed76638 3 years ago 7
they are filthy rat dog pig snake sons of motherless goats neocons!
Steadno 3 years ago 2
Hitler in 1950: it's the debate of 1945.
qanazir 3 years ago
this is just blow back from the Iran-Contra scandal and to make matters worse the united states wants to make american citizens complicicent in double crossing iran and drawing them into a war just like they did to iraq and bin laden.
i guess neocons didnt get the memo
WhoRonPaul 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
israel-vs-palestine(.)com
Cast Your Vote
OneMoreIdea 3 years ago
In bushs defense Iran was put into the axis of evil because he needed 3 countries and thought no one would really care if he threw them in there, if he only had two countries it would be like the bar of evil and who is scared of that?
EnterNameHere55 3 years ago 7
The real problem with Bush's "Axis" was that it was made up of three countries that had nothing whatsoever to do with each other. The World War II Axis(Germany-Japan-Italy 'til 43)was actually a genuine military alliance with a coordinated strategy for trying to take over the world. Bush's "Axis" was three completely disconnected countries with unpleasant leaders.
KennBurch 3 years ago 3
They have in common that they are Godless Terrorists!
You are not getting the point, we must define our world view with ignorant generalisations and moral words like 'evil'. You're sounding like a pinko! :P
SalehUddin1986 3 years ago 4
1)Is their such a thing as a "godly" terrorist?
(Never mind, there've been tons of 'em-almost all religions have produced them save for the Buddhists and the Quakers).
2)I didn't didn't say those countries had nothing in common. What I did say, and what is unchallengeable true, is that they weren't in any sense whatsoever allied with each other(and it wouldn't have been possible for a hardline communist country like North Korea, which is officially athiest, to ally with two Islamic regimes.)
KennBurch 3 years ago 2
Sorry, guess sarcasm doesn't travel well through the interwebs!
SalehUddin1986 3 years ago 2
Oops! didn't get your joke until after I'd posted. Good one!
KennBurch 3 years ago
WOW,Kennburch haven't you been listening? Iran helped us in afgan who got us in sep 11, and then rewarded them by calling them Axis of Evil. So how is Iran anything of Axis of Evil? North Korea didn't work with any of the 2 islamic regimes, they care called the hermit kingdom for a reason! President Bush saw them as a "threat," and thats why he called 3 nations the new axis of evil. DUDE do more research or just don't write at all.
dawnofdarken 3 years ago 3
I was attacking the "Axis of Evil" thing, not agreeing with it. I agree with all you said in that post. I know Bush saw them as a threat(or that at least it was convenient for him to say he saw them that way)but the term "axis" involves an actual alliance, like Germany and Japan had or at least like the Legion of Doom under Lex Luthor.
KennBurch 3 years ago
There was no coordinated plan to take over the world between Germany-Italy and Japan. Japan was not involved with European objectives and were mostly concerned with its own sphere of influence in Asia countered by the British and US. The US had blockaded Japanese trade routes and cut off oil from S.E. Asia, which was considered an act of war, well before Pearl Harbor. There were no plans to extend control beyond its region. The US-Japan war was an extension of the 2nd China war.
km6xz 3 years ago
No good deed goes unpunished.
GreatSatan1 3 years ago
These points were brought up in 2003 and viciously shouted down with cat calls of "traitor" and "coward". The media manipulation by the Neo-Nazis was breath taking in its ruthless efficiency and power. Any questioning of their plans was quickly and loudly branded as betraying our soldiers and the dead victims of 9/11. It was the perfect storm for America. Corruption, incompetence and a threat.
I wonder how Cheney liked lighting a cigar with the Constitution?
Plutonwolf 3 years ago 18
Interesting arguments.
crimsong19 3 years ago 3
What arguments. The NeoCon's are destroying out country!!!!
brovic777 3 years ago 10
The points that Tom Andrews is making.
crimsong19 3 years ago 2
Neoliberals as well
Amebixfan 3 years ago
-Have Destroyed.
will4ward 3 years ago
GO TOM ANDREWS!!! He should be on CNN.
AJthemagi 3 years ago 3
Indeed we did undermine Iran. And as a result, we're in the worst situation militarily since the Vietnam War and economically since the Great Depression. That's what happens when you put incompetent people like George Bush in office. No one wanted to talk about him having Bin Laden in his home sipping tea with him. But they're quick to pin Obama to palling around with terrorists not stating the fact that the old man is simply a Professor at a University now. lol typical Republicans. It so funnny
dralavant 3 years ago 22
God Bless America eh? lol
aiden525 3 years ago 5
Amen. Responding to 911 as the crime it was, and investigating & prosecuting it in criminal terms wasn't macho enough.
So we get 2 quagmires, the trumped-up 2nd one being what Stiglitz calls the 3 trillion dollar war. Not to mention 2 terms for the biggest fool to ever hold the office w/ a refried Reagan junta of cronies in tow. Brilliant.
And the Dems don't have the stones to investigate the crimes (almost literally the least the US populace deserves -- a setting straight of the record).
terpis 3 years ago 20
Well said Terpis!
bar730 3 years ago 2