does anyone know what freq he used to do this. and how much power 120/220?? Maybe you could heat a home with this Idea. using boiler heating system in house.
Very cool! But since we know there no free rides, and since the existing vehicle-power heirarchy is notoriously resistant to ideas - especially to new ideas - & since there is a huge infestation of NIH (Not Invented Here) in them, any further progress with this will have to come from the small private business sector. So, go for it!, out there!
Imagine what pointing 1 billion watts of RF energy at the ocean would do....glad no one has that capability. Oh yes, the government does, it's called HAARP.
This is egregiously credulous reporting. Imagine someone saying "I've discovered an amazing new fuel source: car exhaust! All I do is (insert energy-intensive operation here to turn exhaust back into gasoline) then - voila! - you can run your car on the gasoline!"
This is the same sort of thing. The amount of electricity required to electrolyze water using radio waves is more than the energy you can get out of re-burning the hydrogen from the water.
So if I remember correctly 6th grade BASIC science, to separate H and O you use electricity, wich also bond H and O by burning, if we use water for fuel and the waste product is water then what harm could that cause? Outside of a pissed government,
@rt36crazyfists if it burns sea water i suspect the salt will dissapear and the salinity will change. So fish that live in sea water can't survive. I have no idea how this technology works in detail so I'm not sure.
unless it breaks the laws of thermodynamics it uses more energy to generate the radio waves than you get from burning the salt water since its splitting the molecule and you get energy from the re binding of the molecule does not mean you cant use it for something
I bet you could make a bomb or create an explosion from this, or even find a salt lake and maybe even detonate it. Or something! Now, why would anyone want to do that!
I need a machinist and someone to make a small type of radio wave tube so I can make a type of sparkplug for the gas engine..this will work if I use the same coil setup in the car..there will be more then enough voltage to make salt water work and will be clean..and won't freeze..anyone wants to take this on with me..
This is in no sense burning. Nothing is being oxidized, no more energy is being released than is being put in. He has simply made a microwave over ans is heating up the surface of the water until it vaporizes. Once in vapor form it absorbs more microwave energy and it glows in plasma form. It is just like a florescent light except it uses water. Please people, learn some science. Its really cool and prevent you from making stupid mistakes.
@rt36crazyfists No, burning is an oxidation reaction that produces net energy. He is making the water glow in a power consuming electrical phenomena. It is essentially what happens in a florescent light bulb or plasma ball. Look up how they work. If you heat gases up they look like flames but they are not making energy. It is the difference between a lump of coal which glows by burning and produces energy and a electric stove which glows by heating and consumes energy.
@michalchik erm, read up on this, he is using the radio waves to separate the O, and H out, like in electrolysis, which is what he is burning. They are highly flammable. H and O are the reactants, H is oxidized, O is reduced, the product is water. Of course this is not efficient because it takes more energy in radiowaves to separate the O and H.
@rt36crazyfists The seawater is not burning as the video title claims. People think that he is burning seawater as an energy source the way you burn gasoline. If you want to say that somewhere in the ball of plasma there are some redox reactions going on fine but this is really no more burning that a florescent bulb, and I doubt much H2 and O2 is being made either. It is probably a bunch of free-radicals. I bet the place reeks of ozone.
stupid Americans, how much energy is need to Heed it up and how much energy you get from this, i say u have to spend more energy to run this thing as u get from it... maybe in 10 years it's ready
There is a little problem here called the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Unfortunately it takes more RF energy to perform the electrolysis than the energy produced by the burning hydrogen and oxygen. This is nothing more than an interesting parlor trick.
The key to using water as a fuel IS the ability to rapibly separate the Hydrogen from the Oxygen, then re-introduce it in a combustion chamber.
Could the bombarding of the saline solution with a particular radio frequency & amplitude be THAT catalyst? - Of course temporary storage of the separated hydrogen & oxygen, so that its introduction into a combustion chamber in a controlled manner, is another matter. ;-)
and all you need is a nuclear plant in the trailer!!! i love american upbeat news pieces. Its all hope, little real world fact. ohhhhh look...test tubes.....men with beards...it must be real. ha ha.
'They were amazed' and then what happened to this technology? swept under the carpet by the greedy leaders of this world..... The oil cartels, the US Govt, etc..
It only shows that small test tube burning from what is obviously a gigantic generator, so there must be a lot of energy wasted. I think the whole idea of this video is to show that this may have some future application, but its nothing to get excited about. It is however, pretty fucking cool.
neat, BUT, the power used to get salt water to do this is a LOT more than the flame output....this has to be. I wonder if this is more efficient than just making hydrogen with current through the water?
@VideyoJunkei The pwr used is nothing compared to the pwr used to get oil out the ground, refine it, and transport it. Not to mention the impact the process has on the environment. The only difficulty is getting this widely accepted and used and not being ruined by the oil and gas industries who have vested interest in not seeing this type of technology come to fruition. The implications for home heating is incredible. That means big oil and gas will be trying to stop this.
@Jmalbran well the number has gone up from 13991 to 20438 my friend....lets not give up, the more people wake up to things like this, the better chance we have at beating the global dominators.....peace
OMG, are you all beyond reasoning? The energy that makes the salt water burn comes from the radiowaves. Burning that flame is just a way of displaying the energy that comes out of the radio waves. Where does the radio waves come from? -Electricity, Where does electricity come from i the U.S.? Coal and nuclear. There you go guys. simple as that. It is essentially a fancy way of burning coal. No need to thank me or anything.
Sorry, my computer has hte problem of not posting my comment below others sometimes... just to make sure people know this was in response to you.
Though you are correct that energy would come from those sources, if the energy output from this 'saltwater' is higher than the energy the radio waves take to create it... wouldnt that mean it could effectively power itself, along with everything else?
This could technically be a Perpetual Energy Generator... in a primitive way.
great discovery, but now it probably takes a amzing amount of power to run the radio transmitter, more energy than you get out of a generator you put over the flame, but who knows, theyll probly figure a way to perfect it
well. I dont think the government would tax the water as much as they might tax radio waves.. I mean. they really could not stop people from taking seawater to run their cars. But i bet they could find a way to use a device that can shut down your car so that you could not use radio waves.. unless you pay a "tax" every week or month. I dont think i sound stupid, but to me that seems like the only way the government could actually tax us. but idk. I think the concept is neat though.
If we can get the efficiencies of the energy input to be far less than the energy output, you may have something there. It must be at least self-propagating energy.
well if this man need, help to cure his wife I must first ask him to have a open mind and then look in great detail At what H2O2 might be able to do for his wife just google {Daren H2O2} and look for {HEATH AND HEALING} Look read you know things have been hidden.god bless I might have found a cure for cancer while ive been looking for power
"energy and matter are nither created nor destroyed they change from one form to another"no one can decive god and get a free energy out of no where the energy from the fire comes from the energy in the radio wave and salt only acts as a catalist to ease this ionization which is then reversed into fire(fire and heat are photons which means that this is a transformation of electromag. energy(radio wave) to another electromag. energy (fire) )
actually combustion is usually the result of the breaking of the bonds of the water. the radio waves simply vibrate the atoms in the perfect way to make H2O and it's salt into CO2 and H20 (vapor/gas form).
@kingneddy hey conspiracy nutt. Any invention must be patented in order to keep the inventor or owner of the idea protected from patent infringement. Any man woman or child can go down to the patent office and view these. Inventions and patents cannot be kept secret as that is the nature of a patent, letting everyone else know what you have made so that no one else can make it or claim to have made it and make money off it. Duh!!!!! The protect the inventor and patent owner from infringement.
@kingneddy LoL, that might hurt my feelings if I didnt know it was from a conspiracy nutt loon. I refute you with undeniable facts and your left with nothing but personal jabs. nice. And besides the fact that anyone can look up any patent, which is true, the majority of all scientific advancement is done at the university level, and the majority of all scientific funding comes from government grants, all of which can be traced. You could never sweep a "unlimited energy machine" under a rug.
@Mr4thdimension some day u might open your eyes & stop believing what mainstream media sells u as the truth. now go enjoy being mentally crippled u landless peasant slave. havnt u got some fake counterfeit paper money to worship?
I wouldn't get too excited. There are plenty of ways to extract hydrogen from water.
The thing is that there is no such thing as a free lunch in physics. The amount of energy needed to generate those radio waves would exceed the amount of energy contained in the hydrogen it releases.
But major radio broadcasters are already generating the radio waves, not to mention the sun. so yes it don't magicly make power but it does ultilize the power already being wasted by major commerical broadcasters. like like using wave power... the waves are already there, we don't need to make the waves.
This is weird. This guy was just on 60 minutes last Sunday interviewed by Leslie Stahl about his cancer thing (which is being taken seriously and does seem promising) but there was NO MENTION of this salt water thing. What the hell??? I'm no conspiracy guy but....What the hell???
Don't even think about ever seeing cars use this, it could cure the problem of gas as well as supply new fresh water, but the American government wont ever allow the production of it, itd be way to cheap and they wouldn't get ANY money out of it cause congress is a bunch of rich gas loving bastards
It takes as much as, or more energy than the amount produced by burning, to make the radio waves. Saying it does not take that much energy is truly stupid as it violates the laws of thermodynamics and basic highschool Physics and Chemistry. If it were possible to use radio waves to split the water using less energy than is produced, then one could simply repeat this process continuously and create infinite energy, this is impossible, truly 100% impossible. Don't pretend to know things.
Fireemblem555: It does not have to take more energy or the same amount of energy to start a chemical reaction. The energy is contained in the salt water, and it is released when it is burned. This process cannot be repeated indefinitely, as the energy stores are finite, as are the stores of saltwater on our planet. It in no way violates the laws of thermodynamics.
The seawater burns because the bonds have been destabilized by external means. An alternative way of doing this is with electrolysis. The amount of energy required to break apart water, is the same as the amount released, whether electricity, or radio waves is used, when it recombines. This video is not directly burning seawater, it is releasing the hydrogen, and then recombining it with oxygen in a flame. This is highschool chemistry, give me an example that works differently or fuck off.
You are referring to exothermic reactions. This process is first performing an endothermic reaction, followed by an exothermic one directly after. In the case of burning fuel, the endothermic reaction has been completed well ahead of time i.e. by bacteria. If you take any cyclic reaction sequence, including the seawater one, ultimately the energy both ways is the same, plus energy is lost. So perhaps fuck off is too harsh, but for Christ's sake do not try to outknow me.
I wonder how much energy it takes to actually ignite the sea water. If you actually hooked it up to a generator it probably wont get much energy back from just the hydrogen and oxygen burning.
Burning of hydrogen produces enormous quantities of energy, and igniting it is a one time flick of a lighter, the only real issue is making an efficient radio wave generator. If they ever make one that can keep producing the radio waves that takes even slightly less energy than the burning produces, then the energy crisis would be solved, and everyone powerplant would use a self powered system based on this, and a bond movie would come out where someone tries to ignite the oceans for ransom.
it is great that salt water can burn but it seem that it can only burn if the radio waves are present,which takes electricity to make. im curious how much electricity it takes to ignite the salt water. it looks like a very high electricity out put to get the water to burn.
@mwmmwm123 but dont forget the high voltage required by standard combustion engine to ignite petroleum and also the huge amperage required to crank a starter motor.. from my studies you would be able to energy required is quite similar to that of a standard combustion engine we are all used to
@mwmmwm123 Exactly! Even with current electric and hydrogen propulsion systems, fossil fuels are used for either the electric current or the extraction of hydrogen. Nuclear FTW!
a fuel source that relies on salt water and radio waves sounds to good to be true. i wouldn't be surprised when 10 years down the road we find out that burning saltwater causes abnormalities in the brains of people around it. hello zombie apocalypse!
Well, let's hope that the power efficiency from solar panels would improve so we can use it to power the generator.
RzmmDX 1 week ago
does anyone know what freq he used to do this. and how much power 120/220?? Maybe you could heat a home with this Idea. using boiler heating system in house.
MrBlackelk05 1 week ago
yes but what about the energy used to produce the radio waves?
oasiac 1 month ago
Sad this guy died of Pneumonia in Feb of 2009...Hope his research and ideas continue
WLKCONSULTING 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
in the Quran:
And when the seas are set on fire
وإذا البحار سجرت
sura altakweerسورة التكوير
verse6
and in suratu infitarالإنفطار
وإذا البحار فجرت
(and when the oceans are made to burst-this can mean burst into flames,or burst forth-)
senamoot 2 months ago
mentioned in the Quran:
And when the seas are set on fire
وإذا البحار سجرت
sura altakweerسورة التكوير
verse6
and in suratu infitarالإنفطار
وإذا البحار فجرت
(and when the oceans are made to burst-this can mean burst into flames,or burst forth-)
senamoot 3 months ago
@senamoot
hey barbaric muslim,,,,,, get out of here! dont use ur fucking lies to convert us,,,,,, only the fool can be converted to ur ignorant religion.....
JenMichel100 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JenMichel100
I only put the text nothing more than that
senamoot 2 months ago
The cure for cancer is Hash Oil. Youtube search "Run From The Cure" (full version).
oscarian 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what is the FREQUENCY?!? PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND IF YOU DO NOT KNOW!
rgs11 5 months ago
canseled i quess :/ dont know if that water gets evaporated or does disapear completely, i dont want to burn up seas for electricity.
epicpeluri 5 months ago
next they use this for war and burn ships down :D
nameman1 6 months ago
umm i have one question where is this now my grandma died last month of cancer
1122bogiewogieavenue 6 months ago
where is this technology NOW?
crystalidx 7 months ago
Very cool! But since we know there no free rides, and since the existing vehicle-power heirarchy is notoriously resistant to ideas - especially to new ideas - & since there is a huge infestation of NIH (Not Invented Here) in them, any further progress with this will have to come from the small private business sector. So, go for it!, out there!
PahinhWinh 8 months ago
the cure for Cancer is DCA
cass3477 9 months ago
Imagine what pointing 1 billion watts of RF energy at the ocean would do....glad no one has that capability. Oh yes, the government does, it's called HAARP.
MrSmibby 10 months ago
this is the kind of stuff the government keeps from us... only 30,000 views in 3-4 years i wonder why...
erndawgten 10 months ago
Suppression in 3.....2.........1
BladeValant546 10 months ago
yea thats a pretty heavy duty machine he has there to make a tiny flame. Bet it runs off 240v.
ricktbdgc 11 months ago
It's 3 almost 4 years later. Why have we seen nothing come out of this news?
tucsoniantransplant 1 year ago
This is egregiously credulous reporting. Imagine someone saying "I've discovered an amazing new fuel source: car exhaust! All I do is (insert energy-intensive operation here to turn exhaust back into gasoline) then - voila! - you can run your car on the gasoline!"
This is the same sort of thing. The amount of electricity required to electrolyze water using radio waves is more than the energy you can get out of re-burning the hydrogen from the water.
HansenSmythe 1 year ago
water isn't an element
rt36crazyfists 1 year ago
So if I remember correctly 6th grade BASIC science, to separate H and O you use electricity, wich also bond H and O by burning, if we use water for fuel and the waste product is water then what harm could that cause? Outside of a pissed government,
xplorelife24 1 year ago
I think its a great idea but I bet you it will mess the natural balance big time.
turgore 1 year ago
@turgore why?
rt36crazyfists 1 year ago
@rt36crazyfists if it burns sea water i suspect the salt will dissapear and the salinity will change. So fish that live in sea water can't survive. I have no idea how this technology works in detail so I'm not sure.
turgore 8 months ago
unless it breaks the laws of thermodynamics it uses more energy to generate the radio waves than you get from burning the salt water since its splitting the molecule and you get energy from the re binding of the molecule does not mean you cant use it for something
Prontest 1 year ago
we need more people like this in the world and not people like soulja boy
aznlilhero 1 year ago
any instructions on how to make one of these?
DeathBringer9000 1 year ago
well we need the salt in the oceans, why you ask search for "National Geographic Big Freeze" to understand
TheHadesShade 1 year ago
OMG, a crazy American inventor buring water... And I thought Dexter's laborotory was a comic.
8DX 1 year ago
I bet you could make a bomb or create an explosion from this, or even find a salt lake and maybe even detonate it. Or something! Now, why would anyone want to do that!
MatrixParadise 1 year ago
@MatrixParadise I bet you couldn't. In fact I'd bet my life on it.
8DX 1 year ago
I need a machinist and someone to make a small type of radio wave tube so I can make a type of sparkplug for the gas engine..this will work if I use the same coil setup in the car..there will be more then enough voltage to make salt water work and will be clean..and won't freeze..anyone wants to take this on with me..
pcxcity 1 year ago
@pcxcity No.. you need to stop watching sensationalist TV shows.
8DX 1 year ago
This is in no sense burning. Nothing is being oxidized, no more energy is being released than is being put in. He has simply made a microwave over ans is heating up the surface of the water until it vaporizes. Once in vapor form it absorbs more microwave energy and it glows in plasma form. It is just like a florescent light except it uses water. Please people, learn some science. Its really cool and prevent you from making stupid mistakes.
michalchik 1 year ago
@michalchik Oh it's burning for sure, but first he's making the fuel with radio waves
rt36crazyfists 1 year ago
@rt36crazyfists No, burning is an oxidation reaction that produces net energy. He is making the water glow in a power consuming electrical phenomena. It is essentially what happens in a florescent light bulb or plasma ball. Look up how they work. If you heat gases up they look like flames but they are not making energy. It is the difference between a lump of coal which glows by burning and produces energy and a electric stove which glows by heating and consumes energy.
michalchik 1 year ago
@michalchik erm, read up on this, he is using the radio waves to separate the O, and H out, like in electrolysis, which is what he is burning. They are highly flammable. H and O are the reactants, H is oxidized, O is reduced, the product is water. Of course this is not efficient because it takes more energy in radiowaves to separate the O and H.
rt36crazyfists 1 year ago
@rt36crazyfists The seawater is not burning as the video title claims. People think that he is burning seawater as an energy source the way you burn gasoline. If you want to say that somewhere in the ball of plasma there are some redox reactions going on fine but this is really no more burning that a florescent bulb, and I doubt much H2 and O2 is being made either. It is probably a bunch of free-radicals. I bet the place reeks of ozone.
michalchik 1 year ago
the real question is, can you produce more energy than what you are wasting with running that radio wave generator.
davelantor 1 year ago 7
stupid Americans, how much energy is need to Heed it up and how much energy you get from this, i say u have to spend more energy to run this thing as u get from it... maybe in 10 years it's ready
Strothy2 1 year ago
70% of the world is salt water. Can you say- "BOOOM!" ?
lol
GroogFish 1 year ago
2:10 "That's the true American innovator, someone that is not looking for something, he just finds it." --Priceless,
I can just see the NASA press conference: ...Then we got lucky and found a space rocket. The rest was easy.!!!!
The only idiots here are the 'news' producers. Why are they even talking to polymer engineers anyway?
DaithiDublin 1 year ago
@DaithiDublin I haveto go find some polymer engineers and hit them with a physics book. I can't believe they are that stupid.
michalchik 1 year ago
There is a little problem here called the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Unfortunately it takes more RF energy to perform the electrolysis than the energy produced by the burning hydrogen and oxygen. This is nothing more than an interesting parlor trick.
atlantic54 1 year ago 4
@atlantic54 The only thing I found interesting was that they found 2 "engineers" that were amazed by it.
fjpereny 2 months ago
The key to using water as a fuel IS the ability to rapibly separate the Hydrogen from the Oxygen, then re-introduce it in a combustion chamber.
Could the bombarding of the saline solution with a particular radio frequency & amplitude be THAT catalyst? - Of course temporary storage of the separated hydrogen & oxygen, so that its introduction into a combustion chamber in a controlled manner, is another matter. ;-)
xoio 1 year ago
Pretty awesome!
Vafanciullo80 1 year ago
If BP keeps messing up the gulf we will have no problem burning sea water.
endtyrany 1 year ago
and all you need is a nuclear plant in the trailer!!! i love american upbeat news pieces. Its all hope, little real world fact. ohhhhh look...test tubes.....men with beards...it must be real. ha ha.
polpotsdog 1 year ago 2
'They were amazed' and then what happened to this technology? swept under the carpet by the greedy leaders of this world..... The oil cartels, the US Govt, etc..
mmaghfai 1 year ago
@mmaghfai
OR more likely is that this 'invention' is a complete load of cock.
energyOut < energyIn
monstrositylabs 1 year ago
It only shows that small test tube burning from what is obviously a gigantic generator, so there must be a lot of energy wasted. I think the whole idea of this video is to show that this may have some future application, but its nothing to get excited about. It is however, pretty fucking cool.
bwhites88 1 year ago
neat, BUT, the power used to get salt water to do this is a LOT more than the flame output....this has to be. I wonder if this is more efficient than just making hydrogen with current through the water?
VideyoJunkei 1 year ago
@VideyoJunkei The pwr used is nothing compared to the pwr used to get oil out the ground, refine it, and transport it. Not to mention the impact the process has on the environment. The only difficulty is getting this widely accepted and used and not being ruined by the oil and gas industries who have vested interest in not seeing this type of technology come to fruition. The implications for home heating is incredible. That means big oil and gas will be trying to stop this.
TheyFeedingULies 1 year ago
this discovery is cool,but humans are all 100%electricity,and the technology they make thiner and thiner has got a reason!
we are magnet!
bboymarcel 2 years ago
coool??????? who are u working for? oil companyies? Enron?
ask yourself why this video has only 13991 views and probably you will find that You are the answer.
Jmalbran 2 years ago
@Jmalbran well the number has gone up from 13991 to 20438 my friend....lets not give up, the more people wake up to things like this, the better chance we have at beating the global dominators.....peace
mmaghfai 1 year ago
And if this discovery is totally useless and won't solve any energy problems, who cares? that flame LOOKS COOL =)
Borzeey 3 years ago
OMG, are you all beyond reasoning? The energy that makes the salt water burn comes from the radiowaves. Burning that flame is just a way of displaying the energy that comes out of the radio waves. Where does the radio waves come from? -Electricity, Where does electricity come from i the U.S.? Coal and nuclear. There you go guys. simple as that. It is essentially a fancy way of burning coal. No need to thank me or anything.
linuxj 3 years ago
~LINUXJ
Sorry, my computer has hte problem of not posting my comment below others sometimes... just to make sure people know this was in response to you.
Though you are correct that energy would come from those sources, if the energy output from this 'saltwater' is higher than the energy the radio waves take to create it... wouldnt that mean it could effectively power itself, along with everything else?
This could technically be a Perpetual Energy Generator... in a primitive way.
NoukonGlobal 3 years ago
Comment removed
hypocentre 2 years ago
great discovery, but now it probably takes a amzing amount of power to run the radio transmitter, more energy than you get out of a generator you put over the flame, but who knows, theyll probly figure a way to perfect it
dundermiflinpaper 3 years ago
If you guys didn't know he was assassinated, the oil companies didn't fair to well with it.
Linkekeke 3 years ago
wasn't it Stan Meyers who was assassinated?
qualqui 3 years ago
The man is still alive!
asas2jh 3 years ago
well. I dont think the government would tax the water as much as they might tax radio waves.. I mean. they really could not stop people from taking seawater to run their cars. But i bet they could find a way to use a device that can shut down your car so that you could not use radio waves.. unless you pay a "tax" every week or month. I dont think i sound stupid, but to me that seems like the only way the government could actually tax us. but idk. I think the concept is neat though.
jrod1591 3 years ago
If we can get the efficiencies of the energy input to be far less than the energy output, you may have something there. It must be at least self-propagating energy.
twortle 3 years ago
well if this man need, help to cure his wife I must first ask him to have a open mind and then look in great detail At what H2O2 might be able to do for his wife just google {Daren H2O2} and look for {HEATH AND HEALING} Look read you know things have been hidden.god bless I might have found a cure for cancer while ive been looking for power
allcingeye 3 years ago
"energy and matter are nither created nor destroyed they change from one form to another"no one can decive god and get a free energy out of no where the energy from the fire comes from the energy in the radio wave and salt only acts as a catalist to ease this ionization which is then reversed into fire(fire and heat are photons which means that this is a transformation of electromag. energy(radio wave) to another electromag. energy (fire) )
the stupid american media is fooling silly people
milo77777 3 years ago
actually combustion is usually the result of the breaking of the bonds of the water. the radio waves simply vibrate the atoms in the perfect way to make H2O and it's salt into CO2 and H20 (vapor/gas form).
ShadeValryn 3 years ago
any brilliant new inventions are bought up by force by the world elite & kept from the world to keep the status of oil dominating our lives
kingneddy 3 years ago 16
@kingneddy hey conspiracy nutt. Any invention must be patented in order to keep the inventor or owner of the idea protected from patent infringement. Any man woman or child can go down to the patent office and view these. Inventions and patents cannot be kept secret as that is the nature of a patent, letting everyone else know what you have made so that no one else can make it or claim to have made it and make money off it. Duh!!!!! The protect the inventor and patent owner from infringement.
Mr4thdimension 1 year ago
@Mr4thdimension your a dumb beast of burden.you deserve slavery in a socialist country.
kingneddy 1 year ago
@kingneddy LoL, that might hurt my feelings if I didnt know it was from a conspiracy nutt loon. I refute you with undeniable facts and your left with nothing but personal jabs. nice. And besides the fact that anyone can look up any patent, which is true, the majority of all scientific advancement is done at the university level, and the majority of all scientific funding comes from government grants, all of which can be traced. You could never sweep a "unlimited energy machine" under a rug.
Mr4thdimension 1 year ago
@Mr4thdimension some day u might open your eyes & stop believing what mainstream media sells u as the truth. now go enjoy being mentally crippled u landless peasant slave. havnt u got some fake counterfeit paper money to worship?
kingneddy 1 year ago
@kingneddy When you're calling someone dumb, try to spell correctly. Just a tip!
ASeventhSign 1 year ago
I wouldn't get too excited. There are plenty of ways to extract hydrogen from water.
The thing is that there is no such thing as a free lunch in physics. The amount of energy needed to generate those radio waves would exceed the amount of energy contained in the hydrogen it releases.
bustermk2 3 years ago
But major radio broadcasters are already generating the radio waves, not to mention the sun. so yes it don't magicly make power but it does ultilize the power already being wasted by major commerical broadcasters. like like using wave power... the waves are already there, we don't need to make the waves.
unixaaron 3 years ago
I invented a car that runs on FART pow-a. Baaaa haaa haaa heeeeeeeeee! OH dat a funny joke or wut?!
mercoid 3 years ago
If you are selling this patent, don't sell it to oil companies. They'll buy only to junk it
wa4lrm 3 years ago
unfortunately i think this conflict with a tesla patent.
dals18 3 years ago
Not to mention the major conflict with oil shares, also very unfortunately.
3190423 3 years ago
This is weird. This guy was just on 60 minutes last Sunday interviewed by Leslie Stahl about his cancer thing (which is being taken seriously and does seem promising) but there was NO MENTION of this salt water thing. What the hell??? I'm no conspiracy guy but....What the hell???
voodooshizzle 3 years ago
Corporations are now going to buy up the seas. We'll have to pay for the beach.
Partisan357 3 years ago
Don't even think about ever seeing cars use this, it could cure the problem of gas as well as supply new fresh water, but the American government wont ever allow the production of it, itd be way to cheap and they wouldn't get ANY money out of it cause congress is a bunch of rich gas loving bastards
CoreyPeaches12345 3 years ago
@CoreyPeaches12345 grow a brain u fuckin retard this shit is just shit
dzgfdg 1 year ago
If this is our solution to gas my question is how is the government going to find a way to tax it? Sea water that is.
what is the next step..shutting down fuel companies?? this will cause political chaos!
tjhanopoli 3 years ago
actually, it doesnt take that much engery to create the radio frequency needed to burn the water
horneeowl101 3 years ago
It takes as much as, or more energy than the amount produced by burning, to make the radio waves. Saying it does not take that much energy is truly stupid as it violates the laws of thermodynamics and basic highschool Physics and Chemistry. If it were possible to use radio waves to split the water using less energy than is produced, then one could simply repeat this process continuously and create infinite energy, this is impossible, truly 100% impossible. Don't pretend to know things.
fireemblem555 3 years ago
Fireemblem555: It does not have to take more energy or the same amount of energy to start a chemical reaction. The energy is contained in the salt water, and it is released when it is burned. This process cannot be repeated indefinitely, as the energy stores are finite, as are the stores of saltwater on our planet. It in no way violates the laws of thermodynamics.
Don't pretend to know things.
0mnix 3 years ago
The seawater burns because the bonds have been destabilized by external means. An alternative way of doing this is with electrolysis. The amount of energy required to break apart water, is the same as the amount released, whether electricity, or radio waves is used, when it recombines. This video is not directly burning seawater, it is releasing the hydrogen, and then recombining it with oxygen in a flame. This is highschool chemistry, give me an example that works differently or fuck off.
fireemblem555 3 years ago
You are referring to exothermic reactions. This process is first performing an endothermic reaction, followed by an exothermic one directly after. In the case of burning fuel, the endothermic reaction has been completed well ahead of time i.e. by bacteria. If you take any cyclic reaction sequence, including the seawater one, ultimately the energy both ways is the same, plus energy is lost. So perhaps fuck off is too harsh, but for Christ's sake do not try to outknow me.
fireemblem555 3 years ago
By fuel I was referring to methane, or fossil fuels.
fireemblem555 3 years ago
I wonder how much energy it takes to actually ignite the sea water. If you actually hooked it up to a generator it probably wont get much energy back from just the hydrogen and oxygen burning.
gordonski378 3 years ago
Burning of hydrogen produces enormous quantities of energy, and igniting it is a one time flick of a lighter, the only real issue is making an efficient radio wave generator. If they ever make one that can keep producing the radio waves that takes even slightly less energy than the burning produces, then the energy crisis would be solved, and everyone powerplant would use a self powered system based on this, and a bond movie would come out where someone tries to ignite the oceans for ransom.
fireemblem555 3 years ago
it is great that salt water can burn but it seem that it can only burn if the radio waves are present,which takes electricity to make. im curious how much electricity it takes to ignite the salt water. it looks like a very high electricity out put to get the water to burn.
mwmmwm123 3 years ago 18
play your car stereo real loud
lookn4thepowpow 3 years ago
And ..?
You will only produce SOUND waves not radio waves
flavocachata 3 years ago
@mwmmwm123 but dont forget the high voltage required by standard combustion engine to ignite petroleum and also the huge amperage required to crank a starter motor.. from my studies you would be able to energy required is quite similar to that of a standard combustion engine we are all used to
aarperry 1 year ago
@mwmmwm123 Exactly! Even with current electric and hydrogen propulsion systems, fossil fuels are used for either the electric current or the extraction of hydrogen. Nuclear FTW!
Cdizk 1 year ago
Wow! Combining two scams in one. Cure cancer and get free energy.
subductionzone 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i totaly agree with you
milo77777 3 years ago
wow...just wow.
a fuel source that relies on salt water and radio waves sounds to good to be true. i wouldn't be surprised when 10 years down the road we find out that burning saltwater causes abnormalities in the brains of people around it. hello zombie apocalypse!
cptnwoot 3 years ago
WOW! The story of the cantury and only 1,100 hits?
M4GW 4 years ago 2
Maybe it would be more popular if the seawater came from Britney's Spears' snatch
fireemblem555 3 years ago
lolololololololololololol
MotzaballZ 3 years ago
are you retarded?
horneeowl101 3 years ago
so I wouldn't be so quick to call other people retarded
fireemblem555 3 years ago
2,037 on my time.
MotzaballZ 3 years ago