it looked "no good" to me. when it gets to the point where the ball is even with the post, it should be in front of the yellow. it seems as though half of the ball was covered up by yellow... suggesting it was just right of the post.
It's over the goal post, sorry cleveland fans, but the kick was good. The camera angle can be deceiving. That kick looked good to me, despite the poor angle.
Its ok though brownies, when cincinnati kicks your asses twice again this season, maybe it will be a phantom touchdown that should have been called. Who knows, maybe your defense can outscore your offense.
Isnt this why they made this a reviewable play. Wasnt it Phil Dawsons kick against the ravens that hit he post and then went through and came back through. Why does it seem like all the refs hate the browns.
lol it was def good you can tell by the player's body language and the ball clearly sails above the posts on the inside, it was a good call....field goal is good
That was good.....I was at that game...it actually sailed through the uprights high and it was nowhere near the post...because of where the camera was on TV it looked bad....sucks for Clevland never the less...hope they have there breakout season next year....oh and hope the Cavs keep Lebron
No good.
xSteel40 1 month ago
no goood
cokeman3071 8 months ago
No good by a few inches
jmoneyweida 11 months ago
no good.
pokemonsilverrocks 1 year ago
@pokemonsilverrocks i agree no good
awsome11550 1 year ago
it looked "no good" to me. when it gets to the point where the ball is even with the post, it should be in front of the yellow. it seems as though half of the ball was covered up by yellow... suggesting it was just right of the post.
daleyjem 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's over the goal post, sorry cleveland fans, but the kick was good. The camera angle can be deceiving. That kick looked good to me, despite the poor angle.
Its ok though brownies, when cincinnati kicks your asses twice again this season, maybe it will be a phantom touchdown that should have been called. Who knows, maybe your defense can outscore your offense.
spivedog77 1 year ago
the nfl went and looked at the kick with all avaliable camera angles and said it was good
sarcasticgamer2 1 year ago
Isnt this why they made this a reviewable play. Wasnt it Phil Dawsons kick against the ravens that hit he post and then went through and came back through. Why does it seem like all the refs hate the browns.
cavsfan77 1 year ago
It was good!!!
Bengal050 1 year ago
It was no good.
LivingWorstNightmare 1 year ago
I hate to disappoint all you Browns fans but it was good. It is clearly good. Get over it. You guys lost.
Bengal050 2 years ago
no good
trigman2000 2 years ago
no good it didn't even go over the upright how could it even be a controversy?
Tigersfan829 2 years ago
im a bengals fan but i dont think that was good
Moocow002 2 years ago
Anyone that says that was good is dumb as fuck. I was at the game too bad call refs
zfeezy05 2 years ago
lol it was def good you can tell by the player's body language and the ball clearly sails above the posts on the inside, it was a good call....field goal is good
deranged55 2 years ago
That was good.....I was at that game...it actually sailed through the uprights high and it was nowhere near the post...because of where the camera was on TV it looked bad....sucks for Clevland never the less...hope they have there breakout season next year....oh and hope the Cavs keep Lebron
mikep2g 2 years ago
No Good!
Eclipton 2 years ago
look at the browns players reactions... Def good.
eulogy311 2 years ago
you retarded?
gasperoutdoors 2 years ago
No damn good.
cokeylangley 2 years ago
no good
beastyboy2418 2 years ago