Elitist Georgetown Law Prof jabs David Rivkin, then contradicts self

[omninode]

This video is useless. You do not show what he was responding to. You do not show his entire remark. You do not even attempt to provide some context for this clip. You failed to convince me of anything because you did a terrible job of presenting this video.

[illegalhealthcare]

@omninode - I disagree. Seidman is such a typical, arrogant, elitist law professor. I happened to be at the "debate" in which the biased moderator began with condescending remarks about Rivkin's position. Later, when it was clear that Seidman could not win the argument regarding a limiting principle, he resorted to ad hominem attacks and impuned Rivkin's motives.

[AboveAllNations]

Why didn't you include the context of professor Seidman's remarks in the last 10 seconds? He may have been talking about something completely different.

Cutting him off mid-sentence like that makes it look like you're trying to deceive the audience.