number 19 was supposed to be (2radical 5) over 5, not (2radical 5) over 2.
Halfpipesk8r 1 month ago
@Halfpipesk8r You are right. In my hurry to rationalize, I used the 2 instead of 5. The Tanx= 2rt(5)/5.
davidtutorsmath 4 weeks ago
@Halfpipesk8r I've corrected this now with an annotation. Thank you!
Wow! I learned Trig in an hour. Thank you so much for these videos :)
sacae95 2 months ago
@sacae95 You're quite welcome! While I wouldn't say that cramming is the best way to learn trig, I'm glad that you now feel confident with it.
davidtutorsmath 2 months ago
Comment removed
lol... This isnt a review, its learning trig in an hour. Well done!
cmiller8492 3 months ago
@cmiller8492 Thanks. Glad you found it helpful.
davidtutorsmath 3 months ago
sir in no 16 i think it should be negatine square root of three am i correct?
MrKriminal27 4 months ago
@MrKriminal27 While I do make plenty of mistakes (and I welcome corrections), #16 is correct as -rt(3)/3. Double check that you took the cotangent.
davidtutorsmath 4 months ago
This is EXACTLY what i was looking for! Thank you so much :)
VickiLovesLink 5 months ago
number 19 was supposed to be (2radical 5) over 5, not (2radical 5) over 2.
Halfpipesk8r 1 month ago
@Halfpipesk8r You are right. In my hurry to rationalize, I used the 2 instead of 5. The Tanx= 2rt(5)/5.
davidtutorsmath 4 weeks ago
@Halfpipesk8r I've corrected this now with an annotation. Thank you!
davidtutorsmath 4 weeks ago
Wow! I learned Trig in an hour. Thank you so much for these videos :)
sacae95 2 months ago
@sacae95 You're quite welcome! While I wouldn't say that cramming is the best way to learn trig, I'm glad that you now feel confident with it.
davidtutorsmath 2 months ago
Comment removed
sacae95 2 months ago
lol... This isnt a review, its learning trig in an hour. Well done!
cmiller8492 3 months ago
@cmiller8492 Thanks. Glad you found it helpful.
davidtutorsmath 3 months ago
sir in no 16 i think it should be negatine square root of three am i correct?
MrKriminal27 4 months ago
@MrKriminal27 While I do make plenty of mistakes (and I welcome corrections), #16 is correct as -rt(3)/3. Double check that you took the cotangent.
davidtutorsmath 4 months ago
This is EXACTLY what i was looking for! Thank you so much :)
VickiLovesLink 5 months ago