The German Mozart Tenor tradition goes back to end of the 1920s when Mozart Tenors started making use of Caruso’s technique to achieve the required dramatic expressiveness.
References start with: Marcel Wittrich in the 20s and continue with Joseph Schmidt, Peter Anders, Walter Ludwig, Anton Dermota, being Fritz Wunderlich and Francisco Araiza with their secure line of singing, perfect support of the sound and absolute breath control the two latest references of a Mozart Tenor.
This is one of my fav tenors. In Rossini and Mozart he is a natural choice. he combines a full and rich sound with a glorious high register. And the agility of his voice is first class!
For me, his coloraturas was perfect. Just listen his Il barbiere di Siviglia from 1981 on YouTube. I also admire him as Lensky in Oniegin. Even if it wasn't good for his voice to sing Cavaradossi or Rudolfo, he made a good decision, because he was singing these roles wonderfully. It would be a great sorrow if he had been singing only Rossini. Even if his career had been longer!
WOW WOW WOW !!! Por algo se dijo que el sucesor de Jussi Björling fue Fritz Wunderlich y el sucesor de Wunderlich fue nuestro gran, Grandíssimo Francisco Araiza!! Fue el rey del mundo en los roles de operas de Mozart y Rossini en la década de los 80, cantó para mounstruos de la batuta como Karajan, Böhm, Solti, Muti, Abbado, entre otros. Bravíssimo maestro Araiza!!!
I'm not sure whether or not there is any tenor I can name that matches his Ferrando... It truly is a shame he didn't remain in the Mozart and also Bel Canto realm longer; he would have held a monopoly over these roles in all major A houses through the 1990's no doubt.
Pertile was overrated. Just because Toscanini liked him. Martinelli and Lauri Volpi were far better than he was. Even Merli was a superior singer. Araiza was underrated but was not without fault, he pushed the voice and burned it out quickly. It was a very beautiful sound. Germans considered him the reincarnation of Wunderlich for a short time.
I'm sorry about having to say that, but I can't hear much good in his singing here. His voice placement seems to be too far in front. His sound is "nosy", it lacks the substance of a full voice and (what is more important here) the richness of overtones of a good voix mixte. I hope it's just a bad choice and I think I have heard him better, even in bigger roles. But if it is not, it will be clear, why he had so much problems with the bigger roles later: He lacks the required singing technique.
---> vilosov: You are very daring indeed to leave such a comment on this page - you don't seem to know the Araiza-Mafia yet! Wait for the reactions...! But stay what you are - a philosopher ;-))
For the ones talking about blasphemies, it was 19 years ago, after Araizas Lohengrin debut in La Fenice when Gods maker and most feared and renowned Italian music critic R. Celletti placed Francisco Araiza next to Aureliano Pertile and other great ones. The result in your favourites happens to coincide with his opinion, coincidence???
It is amazing to see Francisco Araiza and Aureliano Pertile in the places 22 and 23 next to each other. That tells more about the general perception of a qualified audience.
well.... I have nothing ARAIZA... we need singers like him.... 199 Carusos would shake our world.... but Araiza next ot PERTILE is... BLASPHEMY!!!! :))))
100singers, I totally agree with your comment. Indeed a madness and a shame to have ruined such a wonderful gift by not sticking to ones own natural limits...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
--> brodsky96: of course Bergonzi is there already (in the 100 best singers - together with other tenors, like Caruso, Gigli, Wunderlich, Björling, Gedda, etc. etc.), and indeed Araizas place in fact is 122 !
--> Machiequesto, jejeje here you are again! You seem not to be able to realize that the first collection 100 Greatest singers is just a ranking less one persons opinion while „your favorites is a ranking list resulting of an inquiry among a wider audience. Considering for such reason your favorites as the prime list, brodsky96 is right! Your comment trying to mix both lists in such way is just spiteful nonsense.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
---> vielflieger: you seem to be weak in maths and logics (as well as in judging singers...). the first 100 singers were of course excluded from the choice by a wider audience. or do you really think your little darling araiza would have been in these first 100 if the choice by a wider audience had been open to all of them? so please think a little bit before you call other peoples opinion nonsense!
--> machiequesto, the results in your favorites corroborates what is difficult for you to accept and your comment confirms the nonsense of your writing, just think about it.
I've always thought Araiza's temperament was not to the Mozart/Rossini roles. He always seemed to be of a more Romantic sort--I find it quite easy to imagine him in more Puccini's, even Wagner. I figure he was more suited to music that didn't say everything itself, and required more interpretation on the singer's part.
and I remember that he insisted on several articles that he was singing it "with his own voice" and not feigning weight. If only every artist were so wise.
Agreed--a spectacular voice early on in the di grazia repertory. I am not sure one can put down his decision to try heavier repertory to selling out to commercial interests. I would be interested in hearing Araiza's own reflections on why beyond "It was time to move on." Perhaps there was a certain restlessness in singing the limited repertory that could find backing to perform internationally in the di grazia category--I would be curious to know the motivation from him.
Welch großartige Stimme, ein großer Sänger, der designierte Nachfolger des unvergleichlichen FW als Mozart Interpret - bis er Karajan in die Hände fiel. Araiza und Wagner plus Karajan, das konnte die schöne Stimme nicht vollkommen überleben. Welche Schande für den Dirigenten, der nicht nur Araiza auf dem Gewissen hat. Trotzdem, seine frühen Aufnahmen sind Vergnügen pur, ihn zu hören schmeichelt den Ohren. Seine Wahl ist verdient, und hätte auch höher ausfallen können!
The German Mozart Tenor tradition goes back to end of the 1920s when Mozart Tenors started making use of Caruso’s technique to achieve the required dramatic expressiveness.
References start with: Marcel Wittrich in the 20s and continue with Joseph Schmidt, Peter Anders, Walter Ludwig, Anton Dermota, being Fritz Wunderlich and Francisco Araiza with their secure line of singing, perfect support of the sound and absolute breath control the two latest references of a Mozart Tenor.
David45NV1 1 month ago
This is one of my fav tenors. In Rossini and Mozart he is a natural choice. he combines a full and rich sound with a glorious high register. And the agility of his voice is first class!
PEAinSwe 11 months ago 9
For me, his coloraturas was perfect. Just listen his Il barbiere di Siviglia from 1981 on YouTube. I also admire him as Lensky in Oniegin. Even if it wasn't good for his voice to sing Cavaradossi or Rudolfo, he made a good decision, because he was singing these roles wonderfully. It would be a great sorrow if he had been singing only Rossini. Even if his career had been longer!
nemorino92 1 year ago 6
WOW WOW WOW !!! Por algo se dijo que el sucesor de Jussi Björling fue Fritz Wunderlich y el sucesor de Wunderlich fue nuestro gran, Grandíssimo Francisco Araiza!! Fue el rey del mundo en los roles de operas de Mozart y Rossini en la década de los 80, cantó para mounstruos de la batuta como Karajan, Böhm, Solti, Muti, Abbado, entre otros. Bravíssimo maestro Araiza!!!
Giorgiobaritono 1 year ago
I'm not sure whether or not there is any tenor I can name that matches his Ferrando... It truly is a shame he didn't remain in the Mozart and also Bel Canto realm longer; he would have held a monopoly over these roles in all major A houses through the 1990's no doubt.
Jarrith4291 1 year ago 2
Pertile was overrated. Just because Toscanini liked him. Martinelli and Lauri Volpi were far better than he was. Even Merli was a superior singer. Araiza was underrated but was not without fault, he pushed the voice and burned it out quickly. It was a very beautiful sound. Germans considered him the reincarnation of Wunderlich for a short time.
GermanOperaSinger 2 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm sorry about having to say that, but I can't hear much good in his singing here. His voice placement seems to be too far in front. His sound is "nosy", it lacks the substance of a full voice and (what is more important here) the richness of overtones of a good voix mixte. I hope it's just a bad choice and I think I have heard him better, even in bigger roles. But if it is not, it will be clear, why he had so much problems with the bigger roles later: He lacks the required singing technique.
vilosov 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
---> vilosov: You are very daring indeed to leave such a comment on this page - you don't seem to know the Araiza-Mafia yet! Wait for the reactions...! But stay what you are - a philosopher ;-))
oscalinetto 2 years ago
he sounds similar to Wunderlich here...Anyone else think so?
marcomeatball 2 years ago 16
This has been flagged as spam show
Worlds apart from Wunderlich, in each and every point of view!
oscalinetto 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that's was exactly what I was thinking!
Tenorosa 2 years ago 4
@marcomeatball I would agree. As great as FW was, & he was, I prefer the more beautiful sound of Araiza. Both were great!
Lovelytenor1 1 year ago 5
Comment removed
oscalinetto 2 years ago
For the ones talking about blasphemies, it was 19 years ago, after Araizas Lohengrin debut in La Fenice when Gods maker and most feared and renowned Italian music critic R. Celletti placed Francisco Araiza next to Aureliano Pertile and other great ones. The result in your favourites happens to coincide with his opinion, coincidence???
Vielflieger01 2 years ago 13
It is amazing to see Francisco Araiza and Aureliano Pertile in the places 22 and 23 next to each other. That tells more about the general perception of a qualified audience.
Vielflieger01 2 years ago 5
well.... I have nothing ARAIZA... we need singers like him.... 199 Carusos would shake our world.... but Araiza next ot PERTILE is... BLASPHEMY!!!! :))))
brodsky96 2 years ago
i mean I have nothing AGAINST Araiza....
brodsky96 2 years ago
Comment removed
oscalinetto 2 years ago
Comment removed
oscalinetto 2 years ago
100singers, I totally agree with your comment. Indeed a madness and a shame to have ruined such a wonderful gift by not sticking to ones own natural limits...
machiequesto 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if Araiza takes place 22... than singers like Bergonzi should have place -(minus) 100?????
brodsky96 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
--> brodsky96: of course Bergonzi is there already (in the 100 best singers - together with other tenors, like Caruso, Gigli, Wunderlich, Björling, Gedda, etc. etc.), and indeed Araizas place in fact is 122 !
machiequesto 2 years ago
--> Machiequesto, jejeje here you are again! You seem not to be able to realize that the first collection 100 Greatest singers is just a ranking less one persons opinion while „your favorites is a ranking list resulting of an inquiry among a wider audience. Considering for such reason your favorites as the prime list, brodsky96 is right! Your comment trying to mix both lists in such way is just spiteful nonsense.
Vielflieger01 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
---> vielflieger: you seem to be weak in maths and logics (as well as in judging singers...). the first 100 singers were of course excluded from the choice by a wider audience. or do you really think your little darling araiza would have been in these first 100 if the choice by a wider audience had been open to all of them? so please think a little bit before you call other peoples opinion nonsense!
machiequesto 2 years ago
--> machiequesto, the results in your favorites corroborates what is difficult for you to accept and your comment confirms the nonsense of your writing, just think about it.
Vielflieger01 2 years ago 5
I've always thought Araiza's temperament was not to the Mozart/Rossini roles. He always seemed to be of a more Romantic sort--I find it quite easy to imagine him in more Puccini's, even Wagner. I figure he was more suited to music that didn't say everything itself, and required more interpretation on the singer's part.
forallyouknow 2 years ago
Beautiful. Singers are a precocious lot. I'm just glad Florez is sensible enough not to damage his voice in the same way...
flaze3 2 years ago
I know, right? Scared people half to death when he did Il duca di Mantua some time ago.
forallyouknow 2 years ago
haha, apparently that was his 'experimenting' stage.
flaze3 2 years ago
and I remember that he insisted on several articles that he was singing it "with his own voice" and not feigning weight. If only every artist were so wise.
forallyouknow 2 years ago 3
Indeed. I still don't believe that Hvorov doesn't use false colour, for instance.
flaze3 2 years ago
Comment removed
polemius01 2 years ago
Agreed--a spectacular voice early on in the di grazia repertory. I am not sure one can put down his decision to try heavier repertory to selling out to commercial interests. I would be interested in hearing Araiza's own reflections on why beyond "It was time to move on." Perhaps there was a certain restlessness in singing the limited repertory that could find backing to perform internationally in the di grazia category--I would be curious to know the motivation from him.
sospello 2 years ago 3
It was a beautiful voice.
Herur22 2 years ago
Welch großartige Stimme, ein großer Sänger, der designierte Nachfolger des unvergleichlichen FW als Mozart Interpret - bis er Karajan in die Hände fiel. Araiza und Wagner plus Karajan, das konnte die schöne Stimme nicht vollkommen überleben. Welche Schande für den Dirigenten, der nicht nur Araiza auf dem Gewissen hat. Trotzdem, seine frühen Aufnahmen sind Vergnügen pur, ihn zu hören schmeichelt den Ohren. Seine Wahl ist verdient, und hätte auch höher ausfallen können!
tenorvoicefan 2 years ago 3
Good choice.
Mooorhe 2 years ago