Um- no... the Fossil Record is astonishingly incomplete- what would it not show? - That there are common ancestors between many species? If you accept BOTH evolution & Judeo-Christianity- it would only be logical that Adam & Eve were Ardipithecus Ramidus- eating the fruit= change [ie physiological evolution] & the flood would have been millions of years ago. Because these stories were recorded SO MUCH LATER- it is only natural that the wording reflect that which the ancient authors were familiar
@catherinesteph What is an Ardipithecus Ramidus? If you accept the Global Flood written in Genesis, the reason there are very few, if any, fossilized humans is because they would have been more mobile, able to run away from potential mudslides, until there was no place to go. Then they would have drowned and decayed on the surface of the water. Re: later records of history. True, Moses wrote the first 5 books of the Bible, but there was no "millions of years", more like 2-3000.
@catherinesteph If you accept evolution as it stands you accept that the earth is 4.5billion years old.You accept that death came before adam and eve.
@wolfcats2 Funny your god seems to only say things in the bible that would have been known to a sand dweller in israel...also that he would think you could fit millions of animals on a boat
@andrewfink1 [I know its been a long time since you commented- but concerning "millions of animals" on the ark] If you believe in evolution- there would only be the need to take the animal which was the common ancestor ["millions" of species would come later through adaptation, genetic mutation etc.]- just a thought.
@catherinesteph Thats a pretty bad understanding of evolution. They would need millions of years too change. Plus the fossil record does not show this at all.
@andrewfink1 [cont.- see above] w/ - Does it matter in the long run if the Jews claimed the Exodus was from Egypt if it was really from Babylon? Or is it not more about the struggle of humanity & their triumph [& constant cyclical -struggle, triumph, fall, struggle...] which matters more than the fine details. This is not to say that the details are necessarily wrong- how could we ever know? As with anything- we should approach it with an open mind- that's all I was trying to say.
@catherinesteph If the story of humanity is not based on proven, fact-based evidence of history, then it is only a legend: nice to hear, but doesn't bear weight in the long run of life. Also, the Bible isn't about the struggle of humanity and it's triumph (over what?), it is essentially about God's creation, mankind's depravity, and the overwhelming love of God for His children.
@andrewfink1 It has been proven that all of the current species of animals can each be traced back to a common ancestor of their kind, so the actual representation on the ark would have been smaller than you would think. Also, even using the smallest possible translation of the Ark's dimensions, there would have been room for over 125,000 sheep-sized animals. The overall average size of any and all land animals is smaller than a sheep, so there was plenty of room.
@scotsmanmemag First where did you get this informantion. Second you relize that some text say that god wanted 7 out of 7 animals. The bible contradicts itself.Also i still dont believe you could fit 125,000 sheep on a boat that small i want the source.
@andrewfink1 The idea of the Bible contradicting itself is based only on the ground that the whole Bible wasn't read. Single passages may contradict each other, but if you read the relative contexts, they develop a further understanding of God's message. The dimensions of the ark were recorded to be 300 x 50 x 30 cubits, which is the measurement of a man's arm from elbow to fingertips, which is approximately 18". In modern terms, that's about 450x75x45 feet...
@scotsmanmemag Re: sheep, Dr. Henry Morris, a scholar on the Bible and history, was saying that the Ark had room for 125,000 sheep-sized animals to be stored, and the average size of all animals is SMALLER than a sheep. So there would have been plenty of room for all animal representatives, eight people, and provisions until the end of the Flood. As for the seven animals, I don't know what the purpose was for that number...
@scotsmanmemag It is said that they were "of every Clean animal by sevens". This indicates individual species considered healthful to humans at that time, and easy to domesticate (sheep, goat, cattle, etc). This way, there would be greater numbers for future survival and adaptability. Also, these clean animals would have been used in future sacrifices to God by his people.
Rat plus one.
mclarets 3 days ago
Stealing Karl Pilkington's stuff?
davidwallis85 2 weeks ago
Um- no... the Fossil Record is astonishingly incomplete- what would it not show? - That there are common ancestors between many species? If you accept BOTH evolution & Judeo-Christianity- it would only be logical that Adam & Eve were Ardipithecus Ramidus- eating the fruit= change [ie physiological evolution] & the flood would have been millions of years ago. Because these stories were recorded SO MUCH LATER- it is only natural that the wording reflect that which the ancient authors were familiar
catherinesteph 1 month ago
@catherinesteph What is an Ardipithecus Ramidus? If you accept the Global Flood written in Genesis, the reason there are very few, if any, fossilized humans is because they would have been more mobile, able to run away from potential mudslides, until there was no place to go. Then they would have drowned and decayed on the surface of the water. Re: later records of history. True, Moses wrote the first 5 books of the Bible, but there was no "millions of years", more like 2-3000.
scotsmanmemag 1 week ago
@catherinesteph If you accept evolution as it stands you accept that the earth is 4.5billion years old.You accept that death came before adam and eve.
andrewfink1 1 week ago
@verbalengine95 well done
mrunknown2798 1 month ago
black and white horses = zebra
verbalengine95 1 month ago
I like the 8bit audience:)
SNikolaM 1 month ago
The guy IS funny!
Masada2013 1 month ago
baha boo fuckin hooo your a rat!
15kickerlivinloud 2 months ago
1 person got left out of noah's ark
goldieluck1 3 months ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Not funny at all.
This man knows more then God WOW FUNNY HA HA.
wolfcats2 3 months ago
@wolfcats2 ...why the FUCK can some people not take jokes about religion.
jimmyjamjoo 2 months ago 5
@wolfcats2 Funny your god seems to only say things in the bible that would have been known to a sand dweller in israel...also that he would think you could fit millions of animals on a boat
andrewfink1 2 months ago
@andrewfink1 [I know its been a long time since you commented- but concerning "millions of animals" on the ark] If you believe in evolution- there would only be the need to take the animal which was the common ancestor ["millions" of species would come later through adaptation, genetic mutation etc.]- just a thought.
catherinesteph 1 month ago
@catherinesteph Thats a pretty bad understanding of evolution. They would need millions of years too change. Plus the fossil record does not show this at all.
andrewfink1 1 month ago
@andrewfink1 [cont.- see above] w/ - Does it matter in the long run if the Jews claimed the Exodus was from Egypt if it was really from Babylon? Or is it not more about the struggle of humanity & their triumph [& constant cyclical -struggle, triumph, fall, struggle...] which matters more than the fine details. This is not to say that the details are necessarily wrong- how could we ever know? As with anything- we should approach it with an open mind- that's all I was trying to say.
catherinesteph 1 month ago
@catherinesteph If the story of humanity is not based on proven, fact-based evidence of history, then it is only a legend: nice to hear, but doesn't bear weight in the long run of life. Also, the Bible isn't about the struggle of humanity and it's triumph (over what?), it is essentially about God's creation, mankind's depravity, and the overwhelming love of God for His children.
scotsmanmemag 1 week ago
@andrewfink1 It has been proven that all of the current species of animals can each be traced back to a common ancestor of their kind, so the actual representation on the ark would have been smaller than you would think. Also, even using the smallest possible translation of the Ark's dimensions, there would have been room for over 125,000 sheep-sized animals. The overall average size of any and all land animals is smaller than a sheep, so there was plenty of room.
scotsmanmemag 1 week ago
@scotsmanmemag First where did you get this informantion. Second you relize that some text say that god wanted 7 out of 7 animals. The bible contradicts itself.Also i still dont believe you could fit 125,000 sheep on a boat that small i want the source.
andrewfink1 1 week ago
@andrewfink1 The idea of the Bible contradicting itself is based only on the ground that the whole Bible wasn't read. Single passages may contradict each other, but if you read the relative contexts, they develop a further understanding of God's message. The dimensions of the ark were recorded to be 300 x 50 x 30 cubits, which is the measurement of a man's arm from elbow to fingertips, which is approximately 18". In modern terms, that's about 450x75x45 feet...
scotsmanmemag 1 week ago
@scotsmanmemag Re: sheep, Dr. Henry Morris, a scholar on the Bible and history, was saying that the Ark had room for 125,000 sheep-sized animals to be stored, and the average size of all animals is SMALLER than a sheep. So there would have been plenty of room for all animal representatives, eight people, and provisions until the end of the Flood. As for the seven animals, I don't know what the purpose was for that number...
scotsmanmemag 1 week ago
@scotsmanmemag It is said that they were "of every Clean animal by sevens". This indicates individual species considered healthful to humans at that time, and easy to domesticate (sheep, goat, cattle, etc). This way, there would be greater numbers for future survival and adaptability. Also, these clean animals would have been used in future sacrifices to God by his people.
scotsmanmemag 1 week ago
@wolfcats2 That's not what he was saying at all. Pay attention and quit being such a prude.
Kelekona 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Not funny at all.
wolfcats2 3 months ago
' I made myself laugh.'
AAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH
LuceNijeBitno 4 months ago 3
how havent i seen this comedian before BOOM!!
6Gizmo101 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Noah has a youtube account
Vampirelover121002 4 months ago
BOO FUCKIN WHOO! haha xD
DrinkToIreland 4 months ago 8
I LOVE it when he cracks himself up
professordracula 4 months ago 2
Haha, loved the punch line! :D
Haraio4 4 months ago 21
awesomeee............is d word
karanlove 5 months ago
Danny Bhoy is the funniest comedian in the world!
CaptnFiretruck 5 months ago 78
Soooooooooooooooooooooo awsome
ZeBlackBaron1 5 months ago
This guy is fucking awesome
waxyweller 6 months ago