man made global warmin wat a load of crap look at the depth this guy has to go in to explainen how it works the people who are behind this are obviously clynicaly insane to dream this up to put people on this planet into shackles its like theres something born in there mind to try these slights of hand tricks to brainwash us and they no there wrong but they have to make us believe like the kinda person who invented three card monte giv me 20 and follow the red ace i bet u cant find it!!
This is the funniest video I've ever seen. I'm not even going to comment on why it's ridiculous. It's not just puerile and so simple that I'd be ashamed to post this professor's crap (he's a professor, unbelievable...) as my own words, no, it's not just obnoxiously simple; it's inherently contradictory! 'Who gets the money'...what's their point, why should ANYONE be allowed to steal! They're attacking corporations for using govt legislation to profit by violent intervention.
Yes, I live in a deep-Red state (by the current ironic definition, not that of historical visual rhetoric), and the general population is in a VERY ugly mood. I have never seen such suspicion and outright contempt for Congress and the Executive branch. If the Republican Party would return to its core values, it could stomp the Socialists into the ground, next fall. I am working on that in my region, but I have limited time, with my workloads.
Cap & trade, plus Socialist Health Care, plus mass amnesty for illegal aliens, plus multi-trillion-dollar deficits.....If all of these are implemented, then civil insurrection/mass non-compliance are the least that will ensue.
1) The evil elites invented the Global Warming problem based on junk science. Garbage in, garbage out!
2) The Zionist-controlled mainstream media manipulate the public reaction. Brainwash the sheeple with dramatic misinformation.
3) The BIG money interests devise the Carbon Cap & Trade solution, a scheme that benefits only a few parasites at the expanse of taxpayers in a predator economy. Move in to profit from the carbon market.
So the price of carbon (the energy economy) will rise. There isn't a viable alternative on a large enough scale to provide any sort of change over for a long time from now. How will governments, corporations, small businesses, municipalities, and individuals afford to invest in new energies if they are continuing to pay more and more for the current increasing demand? There isn't even enough nuclear power to provide the energy demand. In the mean time the consumer sucks the nut on this one.
Oh yea the sun! why didn't I think of that lol.. Actually I Have and if you use the Solar Energy to make Hydrogen Gas we could burn the gas off to make extremely cheep electricity There's one important problem with Solar Energy it needs sun light and we have a night time that gets longer in winter when the demand for electricity is at it's highest and the storage of electricity is very expensive and inefficient. I like the Idea of matter anti-matter Reactors. But You know what people are like!
The Installation Of The Worlds First Commercial Tidal Current Power System isn't far from me and It has a capacity of 1.2MW that will power up to 1000 homes over 5 years. And there are alot of wind farms about. These Experiments are more expensive than they are practical and even if we put a 10ft solar panel on every home we would still need a reliable power source And I don't like the thought of putting a carbon scheme in the hands of the same private companys that have screwed
Also, you do realize one utility owns a majority of all the solar power in the country. San Diego Gas and Electric. And they get most of that from solar thermal. And that was build in the 1970's.
And almost all the countries electricity storage is done through pumped hydropower.
This isn't anything particularly new.
It's just that it hasn't gotten a thin dime of public money since then.
Because I am certain you are pulling this out of your ass. I know the THEORY, but apparently you didn't get the memo that that was just a theory as why CO2 is the culprit....when it ain't the culprit!
And as long as people keep trying to jam that puzzle piece where it doesn't belong we aint ever going to figure out the complete big picture puzzle.
You dont want to look at my crap because you are too afraid to be proven wrong.
we just found out yesterday what air pollution does and where the airstreams take them and how that corelates with the effect that those polluted stream do to the environment where they hit,
but for reality`s sake; chimneys are too high so nobody has possibly figured something out over the last hundrets of years.
-shittin`in the woods isn`t allways as fun as it seems, because flies can attack pretty fast....but that is another story that took deep "conservative science" to fig.
Then you got slammed repeatedly by an illiterate nutjob. That comment was in response to NotaBeetleFan. He seems to be under the impression that Venus is the 2nd planet and Mars is the 4th.
Mars is not further to the sun than Earth is and Venus isnt closer. Hes got them backward.
notice. under all the plans this idot proposes, the cost eventually goes to the consumers. hmm... big corporations are responsible for the destruction of resources... greed... it's all about greed... basically; big corp will reduce its emission, but the income lost due to it will be passed onto the consumer. yeah, this guy is full of shit, companies will work less, employ and make as much or even more as they used to. and now its only a few key companies, this guy is full of shit.
How about contacting someone from the Ontario government to talk about their generous sustainable energy feed in tarrifs kicking in this year.
They've attracted a 500 mega watt per year solar panel maker and solar companies are announcing big comercial orders now that the projects are now economicaly viable.
If there is NO population control, if there is a continued surge in population, then there will be more war anyway. It is already happening in Yemen, they have simply run out of water. Not enough water to go around.
If I believed in Global Warming, there is no need to worry about CO2 as the U.S. ecnomy heads into the Greater Depression, few will be able to consume as they did and many will be so poor, the only CO2 they'd produce would be the CO2 they exhale. Of course, some will argue that would be too much. Geeeez!
@dangerouslytalented anything is shows venues shops echo friendly job... but it seems we are going the to the opposite spectrum the army the mariens and the navy which are like the WORST JOBS!
we dont even need a huge force if we focused on other crap we would be better and we wouldnt put our foot in our mouth as often =)
Come on! Really? as much as I like rice, I don't see That in my future, Is it not that we in a civilization should advance and better our selves so that we can help those less fortunate, I also enjoy Gardening, but I've put 20 years into developing skills that would be better suited to other tasks.
It is not like all industry is going to be shut down. They want to put in more efficient industry, more solar power, more wind power, not just because the shit we are putting into the atmosphere is causing harm, but because the resources we are using are finite and getting harder to get. They are destroying entire mountains to get the coal that is underneath. All the easy to get stuff is gone, and if we do not find other ways NOW, then the economy will suffer later when the demand exceeds supply
this hack never discusses competition. cap and trade will allow smaller polluters to compete. the larger corps will be forced to keep prices down. he's obviously anti-cap and trade.
I don't agree with carbon caps, in fact I really don't care what happens to the climate, the world will end in 2012 anyway..... Palin might be president and you know she'll be very eager to use the 'football'.
The banksters have millions invested in cap and trade legislation. Al Gore is now worth 200 million, when he left office he was worth 2 million. The money changers on Wall Street have a big dog in this hunt. The government is picking winers and losers again.
@bertly71 Do you know how much Al Gore, Clinton, Bush43 & 41, Huckabee, Palin, Giuliani etc. fetch in speaking fees? Many of them fetch between $100,000 to $1,000,000 just to speak at an event because of the number of people they draw to that event just by name recognition alone. Any politician with common sense will make loads of money once they leave office.
I have listened to a few Al Gore speeches and all he promotes id global warming or climate change. How do you explain the corporate jet he uses? The Gore family made a bunch of money back when his Dad was in office from Occidental Petroleum stocks. The big winners in this scam will be Wall Street, mark my words. He is just as corrupt as any of the rest, just with a different cause.
what a lie that the money is kept in the US economy. For example 70% of the money raised in Europe was given to Chinese energy projects (and some say there was abuse). There is also big talk to give the money to countries with big forests so they don't cut them down. The money is to be given away to the UN who then allocates it. It's a transfer all right, a transfer of wealth from developed nations to developing nations.
you idiot! you must have supported Bush who signed the Patriot Act. That may be the most anti-liberty law that has been passed by congress in the last 20 years! But of course you no one from the right could ever be wrong and every one on the left is planning for the advent of a new communist state! Your just another fight wing nut job!
This guy is explaining cap and trade, not global warming people! You should understand that this is what we need to fight, no matter what side of the debate you are on. We can not allow cap and trade, unless you don't mind Mr Gore becoming the worlds first "Green Billionaire" and the only thing that will change is your bank account will have less money..
Am I wrong in saying that the tax payer is being asked to write blank cheques to utilitys and other huge companys so they can charge us more for electricity and if our business are paying more for electricty then the prices of products and services go up. I dont understand in what way this crazy tax is productive or maintainable.
Enron, disgraced CEO, Ken Lay dreamt it up with Al Gore.
Gore and Blood, a Carbon Credit trading Company, I kid you not belongs to Al fucking Gore. It's based in England because it might technically be illegal to have it in the U.S.
Humans are ruining the environment just by existing!
Guess what though?
Plants turn carbon dioxide into oxygen.
I saw some idiot on Fora tv other day saying plants are emitting more carbon dioxide than oxygen.What a load of bollocks.These people have an agenda and its not the progressive or liberal one.Its corporatism at its finest.
LOL you have no idea how stupid you made yourself look calling me a religious nutter.
It doesnt continue dumb ass.
If it peaked in 1998, then we should be choking on CO2 right now and Temps should have rose even more. But the ebb and flow is on its way down and the bullshit alarmists cant explain why that is.
Crap in trade, is NAFTA on steroids. Any 'representative" that votes for this crap, is criminal, and should be dealt with according to Constitutional rule of law; if we still had it.
If you still think there's a difference between parties, look at who's voting for all these crap legislation's. Ignore the assigned minority that gets to pretend they're "not for it".
Why doesn't the military need a permit for each ton of depleted uranium which is spread into the environment? Why do the power plants not require permits for each ton of mercury and other heavy metals spewed into our atmosphere? I am all for reduction in the poisoning of our Earth, but until these - and chemtrails and other atmospheric pollutants - are the focus of attention, I call BULLSH!T on all of the carbon trading schemes. Where are peoples' brains?
Your "rise after etc" thing makes the silly assumption that climate can only involve 1 variable at a time.
greyfalcon. net/ solar0.png
greyfalcon. net/ climate2
And as for absorption and spectra.
During a time period of overall dimming sunlight. You got more infrared radiation going to the earth's surface. Less infrared radiation exiting the earth. And it's within the infrared spectrum you'd expect CO2 and CH4 to react.
why does he says limiting the amount of oil being burned will make the prices go up? Lowering the demand = increase in price, thats what my logic tells me
Limit the power of energy corporations, invest in renewables and fight pollution, but DON'T give power and money to the scamsters behind the phony AGW hoax.
Man's effects are 4% of gasses - like pouring a bucket of warm water in Lake Michigan and expecting a temp change. Witth the record snow storm on the east coast and snow in texas and fla, that reminds me of Al Gore as Grocho Marks: "Who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?" This global warming vid with the 3 feet of snow on the east coast - you can cut the irony with a knife. This is simply a tax on our breathing.
So what you're saying is there is no evil in the world, only good people innocently making mistakes for no personal gain (does this include Hitler & the Nazis?). I don't believe in reptilians but I think AGW is an example of group-think junk science! Do you also believe in the so called swine flu epidemic too, another example of people lying to make a profit! Get real!!!
Co2 is not a pollutant. Carbon credits = carbon indulgences paid to pope gore to keep you in earth gaia's good books. Stop playing fantasy and get to the science.
ive got a crazy idea: lets invest the profits made by cap and trade and put it all into renewable energy, thus eliminating the need for overuse of fossil fuels. letting the energy co's keep the profits from cap and trade only perpetuates their existence.
@Beanmaster73 no...sorry...to simple...makes to much sense. We need something complex that eggheads cook up to screw everybody. Thats the way we always do it
Look at the statistical data yourself. The 1997/98 temperature spike was an aberration but the general trend in the temperature data remains constant in the long term.
I guess that's why Phil Jones the so called trust worthy climate scientist contemplated suicide for his lies & misrepresentations. It's also why the IPCC used a college students thesis along with observations from skiers in a ski monthly as proof the Himilayas are melting. So you are the BRAIN-DAMAGED ill informed retard who believes everything their told. FU=)
Agreed!! I wonder why all these 'mistakes' happen to be mistakes that favor their alarmist views!! It's BS but they are still pushing this bankster carbon derivatives scheme & the EPA has labled CO2 (plant food) a toxic waste & I challenge the EPA to live without it!! What a world indeed!!!
What was it, 30... 40 years ago the alarmists were saying we faced Global Cooling?
All we did was shoot out of a cool period and everyone is freaking out.
Just like when we shot out of the Little Ice Age and alarmists want to point to the Industrial Revolution, when it had more to do with the lack of sunspots that caused that followed by the sudden recurrence of them.
Alarmists just jumped the gun and wanted to blame it all on the Industrial Revolution is all it is.
Thats the solution, tax business people to the point of putting them out of business, then we will breath better, we'll all die due to not being able to feed ourself s, but the WHO would love that too. Depopulation and all that. G.W. Is a hoax.
No matter what spin-off you might think will work, Cap & give away, Cap & Trade, Cap & Sell, etc, the people will pay for it through the rising prices on ALL products and it does not stop a company from polluting which is the main problem. The people cannot afford increased taxation, because after all, this is an indirect tax on the people & We dont need another marketing scheme for investment banks either.
Great video on the issue; clear, concise and lays out exactly what the pros and cons of each proposed policy woud entail without the misrepresentations and hype usually seen in discussions of this nature. Looking forward to seeing part 2 and appreciate The Real News for living up to their name and keepin' it real. Much appreciated...
man made global warmin wat a load of crap look at the depth this guy has to go in to explainen how it works the people who are behind this are obviously clynicaly insane to dream this up to put people on this planet into shackles its like theres something born in there mind to try these slights of hand tricks to brainwash us and they no there wrong but they have to make us believe like the kinda person who invented three card monte giv me 20 and follow the red ace i bet u cant find it!!
frogman249 1 year ago
This is the funniest video I've ever seen. I'm not even going to comment on why it's ridiculous. It's not just puerile and so simple that I'd be ashamed to post this professor's crap (he's a professor, unbelievable...) as my own words, no, it's not just obnoxiously simple; it's inherently contradictory! 'Who gets the money'...what's their point, why should ANYONE be allowed to steal! They're attacking corporations for using govt legislation to profit by violent intervention.
Nintendomanwill 1 year ago
peymaania,
Yes, I live in a deep-Red state (by the current ironic definition, not that of historical visual rhetoric), and the general population is in a VERY ugly mood. I have never seen such suspicion and outright contempt for Congress and the Executive branch. If the Republican Party would return to its core values, it could stomp the Socialists into the ground, next fall. I am working on that in my region, but I have limited time, with my workloads.
bboucharde 2 years ago
Cap & trade, plus Socialist Health Care, plus mass amnesty for illegal aliens, plus multi-trillion-dollar deficits.....If all of these are implemented, then civil insurrection/mass non-compliance are the least that will ensue.
bboucharde 2 years ago
It's "PRS," stupid!
Problem > Reaction > Solution
1) The evil elites invented the Global Warming problem based on junk science. Garbage in, garbage out!
2) The Zionist-controlled mainstream media manipulate the public reaction. Brainwash the sheeple with dramatic misinformation.
3) The BIG money interests devise the Carbon Cap & Trade solution, a scheme that benefits only a few parasites at the expanse of taxpayers in a predator economy. Move in to profit from the carbon market.
tyoungos 2 years ago 31
So the price of carbon (the energy economy) will rise. There isn't a viable alternative on a large enough scale to provide any sort of change over for a long time from now. How will governments, corporations, small businesses, municipalities, and individuals afford to invest in new energies if they are continuing to pay more and more for the current increasing demand? There isn't even enough nuclear power to provide the energy demand. In the mean time the consumer sucks the nut on this one.
strangest1ofall 2 years ago 6
@strangest1ofall
How large were you thinking?
greyfalcon. net/ solarenergy.png
greyfalcon. net/ geoenergy.png
greyfalcon. net/ solarbaseload
greyfalcon. net/ egs
greyflcn 2 years ago
Nuclear fusion energy is a Viable energy source (not to be confused with nuclear fission) It's safe and has no harmfull waste.
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago
@TheTempestSpark
Good idea, and we just happen to have this gigantic fusion reactor already. And it's wireless, available nearly everywhere.
Not to mention it's got about a 10 billion year safety rating.
You might have heard of it?
greyflcn 2 years ago
Oh yea the sun! why didn't I think of that lol.. Actually I Have and if you use the Solar Energy to make Hydrogen Gas we could burn the gas off to make extremely cheep electricity There's one important problem with Solar Energy it needs sun light and we have a night time that gets longer in winter when the demand for electricity is at it's highest and the storage of electricity is very expensive and inefficient. I like the Idea of matter anti-matter Reactors. But You know what people are like!
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago
@TheTempestSpark
Cute.
You and I both know that Hydrogen is idiotic.
greyfalcon. net/ hydrogen.png
And who ever said anything about storing electricity? I'm talking about storing heat.
greyfalcon. net/ solarthermal
If anything, if we were to talk about storing electricity, it'd probably be something more practical, like underground pumped hydropower.
_
Although I guess concrete, steel, and glass is a bit too exotic, compared to something simple like a fusion reactor, right?
greyflcn 2 years ago
The Installation Of The Worlds First Commercial Tidal Current Power System isn't far from me and It has a capacity of 1.2MW that will power up to 1000 homes over 5 years. And there are alot of wind farms about. These Experiments are more expensive than they are practical and even if we put a 10ft solar panel on every home we would still need a reliable power source And I don't like the thought of putting a carbon scheme in the hands of the same private companys that have screwed
the economy up
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago
@TheTempestSpark
Well like said, my focus isn't on wind or solar panels
It's on geothermal and solarthermal
Baseload, dispatchable, a huge available resource, and made out of already mass produced materials.
_
And as for your thought.
The "Cap and Dividend" bill doesn't have offsets or allocations.
greyflcn 2 years ago
@TheTempestSpark
Also, you do realize one utility owns a majority of all the solar power in the country. San Diego Gas and Electric. And they get most of that from solar thermal. And that was build in the 1970's.
And almost all the countries electricity storage is done through pumped hydropower.
This isn't anything particularly new.
It's just that it hasn't gotten a thin dime of public money since then.
Meanwhile you have bloated gluttons like Nuclear.
greyfalcon. net/ nuclear
greyflcn 2 years ago
well please quit breathing
bluetickrunner 2 years ago
the end of the pipe is the big dick fixing to rape the assholes of the american people, GET A ROPE!!!
bluetickrunner 2 years ago 2
Is that what absorbing means?
Because I am certain you are pulling this out of your ass. I know the THEORY, but apparently you didn't get the memo that that was just a theory as why CO2 is the culprit....when it ain't the culprit!
And as long as people keep trying to jam that puzzle piece where it doesn't belong we aint ever going to figure out the complete big picture puzzle.
You dont want to look at my crap because you are too afraid to be proven wrong.
EricIndiana 2 years ago 3
@EricIndiana
we just found out yesterday what air pollution does and where the airstreams take them and how that corelates with the effect that those polluted stream do to the environment where they hit,
but for reality`s sake; chimneys are too high so nobody has possibly figured something out over the last hundrets of years.
-shittin`in the woods isn`t allways as fun as it seems, because flies can attack pretty fast....but that is another story that took deep "conservative science" to fig.
Realizalize 2 years ago
Hemp is the easiest most efficient and quickest way to tackle global warming.
Hemp for clothing, biofuel, textile, building material, food, and so on.
Check it.
gringodeltoro1 2 years ago 2
@gringodeltoro1
check
Realizalize 2 years ago
Watch hemporium SA
gringodeltoro1 2 years ago
@gringodeltoro1
Well it's a great idea to replace paper, and cotton.
But all Biofuels are a bad idea, and Hemp isn't even particularly good in that field.
greyfalcon. net/ ethanol.png
greyfalcon. net/ hemp.png
greyflcn 2 years ago
What we truly need is an end to the suppression of free energy technologies around the world. Have you heard of Dr Greer?
gringodeltoro1 2 years ago 2
Well said! and I think nuclear fusion energy (not to be confused with nuclear fission) has been held back from people long enough.
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago
how about a good old hemp rope that would solve alot of our global warming problems
bluetickrunner 2 years ago 3
A rope to hang Bush? I'm making it right now !
gringodeltoro1 2 years ago 2
Then you got slammed repeatedly by an illiterate nutjob. That comment was in response to NotaBeetleFan. He seems to be under the impression that Venus is the 2nd planet and Mars is the 4th.
Mars is not further to the sun than Earth is and Venus isnt closer. Hes got them backward.
EricIndiana 2 years ago 2
notice. under all the plans this idot proposes, the cost eventually goes to the consumers. hmm... big corporations are responsible for the destruction of resources... greed... it's all about greed... basically; big corp will reduce its emission, but the income lost due to it will be passed onto the consumer. yeah, this guy is full of shit, companies will work less, employ and make as much or even more as they used to. and now its only a few key companies, this guy is full of shit.
Idtelos 2 years ago
@Idtelos
how about modernizing or buying a filter,
would be impossible? !
new computers every 3 years on every desk,
for which to build there is put as much energy in it as it is needed to build a car,
but hell no, we don`t need sollution that was built after Reagan was born.
Realizalize 2 years ago
I think you need to see a planetary chart.
Mars is not further than the sun than the Earth and Venus is not closer.
I think you have Mars and Venus mixed up.
Venus is in a volatile state right, they are going through the same process we went threw when we were at that distance from the sun.
Mars and Earth will eventually trade places, as will Earth and Venus.
EricIndiana 2 years ago 2
How about contacting someone from the Ontario government to talk about their generous sustainable energy feed in tarrifs kicking in this year.
They've attracted a 500 mega watt per year solar panel maker and solar companies are announcing big comercial orders now that the projects are now economicaly viable.
brotherjupiter 2 years ago
If there is NO population control, if there is a continued surge in population, then there will be more war anyway. It is already happening in Yemen, they have simply run out of water. Not enough water to go around.
dangerouslytalented 2 years ago 6
If I believed in Global Warming, there is no need to worry about CO2 as the U.S. ecnomy heads into the Greater Depression, few will be able to consume as they did and many will be so poor, the only CO2 they'd produce would be the CO2 they exhale. Of course, some will argue that would be too much. Geeeez!
InTheSticks1881 2 years ago
You know what got the US out of the first great depression? Works programs. Then the biggest work program ever, world war II.
Rigging the entire country for solar, wind, and greater energy efficiency would be a GREAT works program.
dangerouslytalented 2 years ago 12
@dangerouslytalented anything is shows venues shops echo friendly job... but it seems we are going the to the opposite spectrum the army the mariens and the navy which are like the WORST JOBS!
we dont even need a huge force if we focused on other crap we would be better and we wouldnt put our foot in our mouth as often =)
Daka12s 2 years ago
Yea and while there at it they should train everyone to be gardiners and put them to work in the paddy fields to grow the rice you'll be paid with.
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago
... being paid in rice is better than starving...
dangerouslytalented 2 years ago 15
Come on! Really? as much as I like rice, I don't see That in my future, Is it not that we in a civilization should advance and better our selves so that we can help those less fortunate, I also enjoy Gardening, but I've put 20 years into developing skills that would be better suited to other tasks.
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago
It is not like all industry is going to be shut down. They want to put in more efficient industry, more solar power, more wind power, not just because the shit we are putting into the atmosphere is causing harm, but because the resources we are using are finite and getting harder to get. They are destroying entire mountains to get the coal that is underneath. All the easy to get stuff is gone, and if we do not find other ways NOW, then the economy will suffer later when the demand exceeds supply
dangerouslytalented 2 years ago 13
The people who are designing these permit schemes are the same ones that designed the Enron corporate structure and the subprime mortgage securities.
They will be designed to produce the most amount of profit, not to decrease the amount of emissions.
dangerouslytalented 2 years ago 20
It's all a scam
sharpsteve2003 2 years ago 2
no matter what the little guy gets screwed
sharpsteve2003 2 years ago 2
this guy used to be a right wing CATO intern.
LouieArrighi 2 years ago
this hack never discusses competition. cap and trade will allow smaller polluters to compete. the larger corps will be forced to keep prices down. he's obviously anti-cap and trade.
LouieArrighi 2 years ago
I don't agree with carbon caps, in fact I really don't care what happens to the climate, the world will end in 2012 anyway..... Palin might be president and you know she'll be very eager to use the 'football'.
ugboy1 2 years ago
ok, you've awakened me..i now believe whatever you do
hamletundone 2 years ago
The banksters have millions invested in cap and trade legislation. Al Gore is now worth 200 million, when he left office he was worth 2 million. The money changers on Wall Street have a big dog in this hunt. The government is picking winers and losers again.
bertly71 2 years ago 3
@bertly71 Do you know how much Al Gore, Clinton, Bush43 & 41, Huckabee, Palin, Giuliani etc. fetch in speaking fees? Many of them fetch between $100,000 to $1,000,000 just to speak at an event because of the number of people they draw to that event just by name recognition alone. Any politician with common sense will make loads of money once they leave office.
ugboy1 2 years ago
I have listened to a few Al Gore speeches and all he promotes id global warming or climate change. How do you explain the corporate jet he uses? The Gore family made a bunch of money back when his Dad was in office from Occidental Petroleum stocks. The big winners in this scam will be Wall Street, mark my words. He is just as corrupt as any of the rest, just with a different cause.
bertly71 2 years ago
what a lie that the money is kept in the US economy. For example 70% of the money raised in Europe was given to Chinese energy projects (and some say there was abuse). There is also big talk to give the money to countries with big forests so they don't cut them down. The money is to be given away to the UN who then allocates it. It's a transfer all right, a transfer of wealth from developed nations to developing nations.
Renegen1 2 years ago
fascist bastard.....anti-liberty totalitarian
hamletundone 2 years ago
you idiot! you must have supported Bush who signed the Patriot Act. That may be the most anti-liberty law that has been passed by congress in the last 20 years! But of course you no one from the right could ever be wrong and every one on the left is planning for the advent of a new communist state! Your just another fight wing nut job!
ugboy1 2 years ago 3
correct..so far right i think bush was a communist...here is my one observation..anything and everything govt touches turns to shit.
hamletundone 2 years ago
Gore has been sued and lost in a british court and been forced to retract his claims on CO2 emmisions and climate change. this is an illegal tax.
jaba987 2 years ago
This guy is explaining cap and trade, not global warming people! You should understand that this is what we need to fight, no matter what side of the debate you are on. We can not allow cap and trade, unless you don't mind Mr Gore becoming the worlds first "Green Billionaire" and the only thing that will change is your bank account will have less money..
cabl3guy2012 2 years ago
do you belive in the lord?
KlaraMargret 2 years ago
do you believe in a magical jewish zombie?
smokydave 2 years ago 2
This cap and trade is a pile of shit and I aint buyin it.
Look you dumb motherfuckers its just another fucking tax!
zoticus1 2 years ago 3
Gore and Blood
(it's a company that trades in Carbon Credits, I SHIT YOU NOT) Belongs to Al Gore.
chewbaca1989 2 years ago 3
Am I wrong in saying that the tax payer is being asked to write blank cheques to utilitys and other huge companys so they can charge us more for electricity and if our business are paying more for electricty then the prices of products and services go up. I dont understand in what way this crazy tax is productive or maintainable.
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago 2
Enron, disgraced CEO, Ken Lay dreamt it up with Al Gore.
Gore and Blood, a Carbon Credit trading Company, I kid you not belongs to Al fucking Gore. It's based in England because it might technically be illegal to have it in the U.S.
It's all a damn $cam, so go jump off a bridge.
chewbaca1989 2 years ago 4
Understand what they are saying,
Humans are ruining the environment just by existing!
Guess what though?
Plants turn carbon dioxide into oxygen.
I saw some idiot on Fora tv other day saying plants are emitting more carbon dioxide than oxygen.What a load of bollocks.These people have an agenda and its not the progressive or liberal one.Its corporatism at its finest.
zoticus1 2 years ago
I wish the federal govt would try to cap the energy that comes into the states.
The federal govt choking off their own people from productivity would guarantee a cascade of states seceding from the union.
kmg501 2 years ago
Every stop breathing, you are exahling CO2!!!
usergently 2 years ago
LOL where did you go to school?
What degree were you pursuing when you learned that garbage?
Oh, you dont have one?
You sure had me fooled.
So you mean the hole in the ozone and the sun have nothing at all to do with global temp?
And all we need to worry about is CO2?
You do realize the ocean, volcanoes and even dying leaves from the fall put out massive more tons of CO2 than we do right?
EricIndiana 2 years ago 2
If you dont think the sun has anything to do with our global temperature than you are a fucking idiot.
How can we be the paranoid one when you guys are the ones saying "the sky is fallin?"
EricIndiana 2 years ago 3
LOL you have no idea how stupid you made yourself look calling me a religious nutter.
It doesnt continue dumb ass.
If it peaked in 1998, then we should be choking on CO2 right now and Temps should have rose even more. But the ebb and flow is on its way down and the bullshit alarmists cant explain why that is.
EricIndiana 2 years ago
Youre the dumb ass.
The data was manipulated by Al Gore.
The Ice Core samples revealed the EXACT OPPOSITE of what Al Gore and alarmist say.
Rises in CO2 lags BEHIND temperature rise by 200 years... what did Al Gore say "the science is tricky", ya because he totally lied to you.
Look it up.
Better yet, just watch this video I put together.
watch?v=XwCqbzM-g_I
EricIndiana 2 years ago
That is the question.
Gilliatt83 2 years ago
Crap in trade, is NAFTA on steroids. Any 'representative" that votes for this crap, is criminal, and should be dealt with according to Constitutional rule of law; if we still had it.
If you still think there's a difference between parties, look at who's voting for all these crap legislation's. Ignore the assigned minority that gets to pretend they're "not for it".
bigc028282 2 years ago
Why doesn't the military need a permit for each ton of depleted uranium which is spread into the environment? Why do the power plants not require permits for each ton of mercury and other heavy metals spewed into our atmosphere? I am all for reduction in the poisoning of our Earth, but until these - and chemtrails and other atmospheric pollutants - are the focus of attention, I call BULLSH!T on all of the carbon trading schemes. Where are peoples' brains?
Lurie2010 2 years ago 3
So how is it we hit our peak already in 1998?
Did we already curb CO2 or something?
I have heard of chemistry, ever hear of the sun, sunspots and the hole in the ozone?
Absorbion and spectra?
You obviously havent a clue as to what you are talking about and trying to sound all scientific.
Utter fail.
If "absorbion" and spectra proves CO2 is behind Global Warming, even though CO2 levels rise AFTER temperatures rise...
then why is CO2 Global Warming a fact instead of a bullshit theory?
EricIndiana 2 years ago
@EricIndiana
Well that's a simple answer.
Your "rise after etc" thing makes the silly assumption that climate can only involve 1 variable at a time.
greyfalcon. net/ solar0.png
greyfalcon. net/ climate2
And as for absorption and spectra.
During a time period of overall dimming sunlight. You got more infrared radiation going to the earth's surface. Less infrared radiation exiting the earth. And it's within the infrared spectrum you'd expect CO2 and CH4 to react.
greyfalcon. net/ greenhouse
greyflcn 2 years ago
You dont remember me do you?
We have already had this argument 2 months ago.
watch?v=XwCqbzM-g_I
EricIndiana 2 years ago
@EricIndiana
Perhaps we did.
Might I refer you to page 27
greyfalcon. net/ swindle
greyflcn 2 years ago
why does he says limiting the amount of oil being burned will make the prices go up? Lowering the demand = increase in price, thats what my logic tells me
Mendelevium146 2 years ago
Limit the power of energy corporations, invest in renewables and fight pollution, but DON'T give power and money to the scamsters behind the phony AGW hoax.
flyhead2 2 years ago 2
Man's effects are 4% of gasses - like pouring a bucket of warm water in Lake Michigan and expecting a temp change. Witth the record snow storm on the east coast and snow in texas and fla, that reminds me of Al Gore as Grocho Marks: "Who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?" This global warming vid with the 3 feet of snow on the east coast - you can cut the irony with a knife. This is simply a tax on our breathing.
mutexnet 2 years ago
So what you're saying is there is no evil in the world, only good people innocently making mistakes for no personal gain (does this include Hitler & the Nazis?). I don't believe in reptilians but I think AGW is an example of group-think junk science! Do you also believe in the so called swine flu epidemic too, another example of people lying to make a profit! Get real!!!
777CARL777 2 years ago 4
Co2 is not a pollutant. Carbon credits = carbon indulgences paid to pope gore to keep you in earth gaia's good books. Stop playing fantasy and get to the science.
educution 2 years ago
ive got a crazy idea: lets invest the profits made by cap and trade and put it all into renewable energy, thus eliminating the need for overuse of fossil fuels. letting the energy co's keep the profits from cap and trade only perpetuates their existence.
Beanmaster73 2 years ago
@Beanmaster73 no...sorry...to simple...makes to much sense. We need something complex that eggheads cook up to screw everybody. Thats the way we always do it
Gunnarsguns 2 years ago
How can we put a trade cap on carbon dioxide pollution when it has never been proven that carbon dioxide is behind global warming?
Global Warming has halted and all indication points to it being on its way back down over the last 10 years.
How is that possible if CO2 is the major culprit?
A: Its not possible.
CO2 is not a pollutant and this is just another way to tax America and use a seemingly good cause/intentions as a pretext to do it.
EricIndiana 2 years ago 5
Look at the statistical data yourself. The 1997/98 temperature spike was an aberration but the general trend in the temperature data remains constant in the long term.
TheNewRenaissance 2 years ago
I guess that's why Phil Jones the so called trust worthy climate scientist contemplated suicide for his lies & misrepresentations. It's also why the IPCC used a college students thesis along with observations from skiers in a ski monthly as proof the Himilayas are melting. So you are the BRAIN-DAMAGED ill informed retard who believes everything their told. FU=)
777CARL777 2 years ago 3
That should be a new cry for alarmists...
instead of "The sky is falling! The sky is falling!!"
the new saying of our generation is...
"The Himilayas are melting! The Himilayas are melting!!"
What a world, what a world!
EricIndiana 2 years ago
Agreed!! I wonder why all these 'mistakes' happen to be mistakes that favor their alarmist views!! It's BS but they are still pushing this bankster carbon derivatives scheme & the EPA has labled CO2 (plant food) a toxic waste & I challenge the EPA to live without it!! What a world indeed!!!
777CARL777 2 years ago
What was it, 30... 40 years ago the alarmists were saying we faced Global Cooling?
All we did was shoot out of a cool period and everyone is freaking out.
Just like when we shot out of the Little Ice Age and alarmists want to point to the Industrial Revolution, when it had more to do with the lack of sunspots that caused that followed by the sudden recurrence of them.
Alarmists just jumped the gun and wanted to blame it all on the Industrial Revolution is all it is.
EricIndiana 2 years ago 2
I think real news is oblivious to the climategate scandals that continue to come to light so I give real news a F- & I see no difference from MSM!!!
777CARL777 2 years ago
Thats the solution, tax business people to the point of putting them out of business, then we will breath better, we'll all die due to not being able to feed ourself s, but the WHO would love that too. Depopulation and all that. G.W. Is a hoax.
Beowulf2327 2 years ago 2
No matter what spin-off you might think will work, Cap & give away, Cap & Trade, Cap & Sell, etc, the people will pay for it through the rising prices on ALL products and it does not stop a company from polluting which is the main problem. The people cannot afford increased taxation, because after all, this is an indirect tax on the people & We dont need another marketing scheme for investment banks either.
2minstral 2 years ago 3
Great video on the issue; clear, concise and lays out exactly what the pros and cons of each proposed policy woud entail without the misrepresentations and hype usually seen in discussions of this nature. Looking forward to seeing part 2 and appreciate The Real News for living up to their name and keepin' it real. Much appreciated...
wildpeachatl737 2 years ago
nice video, keep it up real news :)
paritoshmehta123 2 years ago