Added: 1 year ago
From: RobUK13
Views: 5,686
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • drewcast

  • Few people know that the real reason Jurassic Park was funded was to clone T-Rexes to see how many bears can take down a T-Rex.

    Spoilers.

  • The response to this the following week was good.

  • - Wait, a Raccoon is not a marsupial ~

    your right, we should talk about video games

    LOL

  • Wait, they're just playing Would You Rather.

    The World-Famous Scottabot should sue.

  • I'd say ten bears could take down a T-Rex, if they're REALLY committed to killing that T-Rex, and can't run away from the fight. Otherwise, sheer size difference means T-Rex wins. Also Great White Sharks? You'd need like five sharks to kill a T-Rex. Maybe more, if they're not that strong.

    Now, grizzlies vs. sharks? That's difficult. I'd say they're pretty even, size wise, but shark has the hometown advantage, so I'd say two bears per shark, MAYBE.

  • watch the movie 'SUNSHINE'

    do it, its good

  • I am pretty sure 2 bears could kill one shark, they aren't much bigger than bears

  • you need perhaps 6 to 9 bears to take down a T Rex

  • so basically this is a live powerlevel discussion

  • You are misusing this scenario.

  • Giant pandas are bears, red pandas are racoons

  • Best bombcast conversation ever.

  • best conversation ever.

  • haha, "bearpile"

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more