Added: 5 years ago
From: FormaeMentis
Views: 38,584
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • oh this doesn't apply to the French... this is that french paradox thing... the french eat fattening food, drink wine and smoke more than everyone else and have lower rates of cancer...

  • I was amazed, stepping over all the bodies of the dead and dying, all due to second hand smoke. Its amazing, because the smokers don't get cancer for 30 years or so after starting to smoke.

  • Some smokers don't have a very good sense of smell. And when they give up they cannot stand to be in room with other people smoking.

  • The risks were known then. The first research dates from the 1920s.

  • Toute fumée est nocive...les fumeurs savent qu'ils peuvent racourcir leur vie...et cé bien fait!!!!

  • ich hoffe ihr scheiss raucher stirbt alle!!! Steckt euch die zigarretten in den Maul bis ihr stirbt...ihr spasten... 

  • is this french?

  • Hahaha good joke

  • What is passive smoking?

  • 'Passive smoking' is a kids fairy tale.....

  • Lol.

  • @arghydoodles its when you breathe in somebody elses smoke

  • Agressive smoking is much better. Check out Keith Allen in 'The Yob' for great example. When you've done that, go and do something else, don't be looking to me for ideas I've got a stuttering competition to practice for.

  • if those were two women in the front seat of the car smoking that wouldve been so sexy, especially with the kids in the back like that.

  • unreal , the number of pensioners in the uk is going to double in 20 years. didnt these people grow up when everyone smoked. in cinemas on buses on planes etc etc. nanny state get lost.

  • Hey Caffeine, you are absolutely correct. But it is very annoying when these exaggerations are made into laws. Thats is really wrong.

  • @nem2010 wat

  • when most people smoked in the 1940s and 50s we didn't have all these so called "smoking related illnesses", why? simple really we didn't have processed foods , the real cause.

  • your gonna tell my that my grandfather i never met got lung cancer not from the 3 packs of ciggarettes he smoked, but a couple cubes of processed cheese. shut the fuck up you know it all bitch

  • He probably got cancer from all the asbestos and coal fires of the time, poor chap. 3 Packs of cigs a day,? Harmless...

  • all pepol who smoke are so fucking big idiots...smokers make cigarettes owners rich so they can get a lambo and a vile in miami...poor ppl who smoke , they think they are cool , but they are youst poor little losers.ah btw why govern should say araound "smoke is dangerous,smoke kills!,etc" if they get like 10 bil $ per year ?

  • Thats not an arguement! Thats the same with everything u dumbass. If u buy cabbage it makes the cabbage owners richer, if u download porn it makes pornographers richer.

    So go complain about cabbage and porn and let smokers decide, its there life and i have a strange feeling they (we) dont want u in it.

    :P

  • man i smoke im not poor and yes it makes them rich y because they had a good idea for a company wen you bought your computer you made the owner rich so he could go live in his condo in cali and now look at you harping on smokers in your small dwelling in what i can only geuss is located int he ecocentric head up your ass hippy side of town

  • Can anybody give me a single link on a study proving that passive smoking actually really causes a cancer? I haven't found a one yet, definitely not one with any significant results.

  • for one when you take back the smoke the lungs filter good and bad stuff it it lets the worst part of the cigerret it to the air for other people to inhale your only saying stuff like that becuse ur in denile

  • What I know for fact is that buy burning wood in a fireplace concetration of dangerous substances in a room is several hundreads times higher than by smoking.

  • Thus people with fireplaces in their houses should be diagnosed cancer or lungs deseases within months.

  • It actually does cause harm, but the health affects are so minute that they're on par with the air you breath in a city. It's not untrue, just exaggerated. Most of the anti-smoking reports never consist of scientific information but pure statistics.

  • @caffeine4671 hey if i smoke on occasions will that make me a passive smoker ? does that mean i shouldnt control smoking .. and be a chain smoker

  • @DogOfMyMiss if you smoke that makes you active smoker, passive smoking means breathing in the smoke from a cigarette you didnt smoke. Active smoking causes more harm to your body in comparison with passive one

  • Crap. Living in the cioty you breath far more dangerous chemicals 24/7.

  • Where the heck are the American Anti-Smoking commercials. Anyone?

  • cool, gives the message

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more