Added: 5 years ago
From: mac1no
Views: 23,045
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i would get a mac but there too expensive and i HATE the operating system. like if u agree

  • What is the music please?

  • Bunny?

  • Win at that time ....

    CPU is getting faster and faster ....leave you old buddy back

  • Yeah but like The PS3s 8 cores may be clocked at 3.2ghz but that doesnt mean its as powerful as a 8-core 3.2ghz from intel or AMD

  • wrong ps3 cell proccesor 8 cores all at 3 ghz

  • w00t that must mean my dual i7, 16 cores owns your ps3

    suck a dick..

  • or u go f ur self im a intel user too ;)... i like using the intel atom in my netbook and no over clocking and it is fine rendering 3d animations / movies / aobe after efffects shit. so ha ! btw i dont use ps3 i just know sum lf the specs and the ps3 processer is a cell one made by sony 360 uses ppc

  • @mysteriousjustin You're lying. There's no way you can have 16 cores with two Core i7 processors since there's no Core i7 with 8 cores yet. And even if there were, Core i7 processors can't be used in dual setups, as they only have one QPI link. Xeons, on the other hand, have two, one for communication with the motherboard and the other for communication with the other Xeon.

  • forgot but still pentieum toasts ppc

  • Ahh actualy they dont

    The Cell Processor in the PS3 (Which is 7 Cores running at 2.3 GHz per core) Is a Power PC Prosessor.

  • @sousuke121 IBM Cell is ONE core at 3.2 GHz and eight RISC SIMD units (SPEs), not seven cores. And on the PS3, one of the SPEs is disabled to increase production yields and another is reserved for XMB, leaving six for games.

  • @NewLynxChannel I said that about a year ago, i know now xD

  • notice how they make fun of intel then they put intel cpus in there computers

  • You know old this ad is?

  • The PowerPC was better, and in my opinion it still is. However, the future PowerPC processor is not suitable inside a personal computer. That's why they transitioned.

  • Some people say that PPCs are actually ace at video editing; there was an instance that a Christian congregation (forgot the name though) was asking for a Mac on TV, probably a pre-Intel one since it was several years ago when I watched it...

  • PPC used to be faster than intel. That changed.

  • ii know :( at least were faster now ;)

  • back when Apple cared... just like the grounded heatsinks in these things to discharge static

  • PowerMac G3 is really a wonderful machine the most revolutionary PowerMac ever, even more revolutionary than the G5.

    The G3 is a fast chip even nowadays. I can use Panther on it, and manage little 800x600 photos on it and it works nice. Also, it's a wonderful backup machine.

  • What's the song??

  • burn baby burn

  • no it isn't, it's called "disco inferno" by Saturday Night Fever, just found out a few months ago ;]

  • This commercial was aired in 1997

  • Yes the chip was faster at the time, but wen P3 was released it Smoked the Mac in every thing, I still have the P3 1.0Ghz up and running and it colud still smoke any Mac, too bad the Mac was 3 times more expensive.

  • "I still have the P3 1.0 Ghz smokes any mac"

    it means

    "A Pentium 3 @ 1,00 GHz runs faster that a Quad Xeon running @ 3,00 GHz"

    and it also means

    "A P3 running @ 1.0 GHz runs faster than a G4 @ 1.42 GHz".

    Please don't post these cosmic bullshits, just go read the books of Andrew Tanenbaum which is one of the greatest expert of CPUs and he will explain you why Pentium sucks and why P3 is crap.

    Mac rules, anyone knows it, why just don't admit the truth?

    MAC4LIFE

  • You must try a mac, you'll see how powerful it is. and nowadays the p3 @ 1Ghz it's... a bit slow.

    For example, try photoshop. On Windows (3.2 Ghz Prescott, Geforce 6800, 2 Gb Ram) a radial bleur on photoshop it's done in 35 seconds. On Mac OS X (1.42 Ghz G4, Radeon 7000, 1 Gb Ram) just in 23 seconds.

    I mean, the p3 is just a nice processor, but if you want to go fast just buy an Intel Core 2 Duo (or a G5, they're fast even today...

  • Dude, no, Just no. Mac is better, and thats how life is, get over it.

  • BlackHatLinwix, go eat cum.

  • I'm afraid I can't join you, perhaps you are on the wrong web site.

  • Oh, shut up, BlackHat.

  • Times change. I used to laugh at Intel processors too, but nowadays prefer them over AMD or IBM's PPC.

  • see, what i dont get is that loses like many on this page dont realise this video is from 1997 and it WAS alot faster than the intel chip at the time.

  • (L) MAC (L)

  • stupid mac, hypocrites

  • what do you mean?

  • You do realize that just because the intel chips are better now doesn't mean the Pentium 2 was a masterpiece, Face it Pentium 2 wasn't better than the G3 processor, It just wasn't

  • Exactly. I don't recall Apple ever making a commercial that bashed Intel processors in general, just *Pentiums.* The Pentium family was never very good; the G3, on the other hand, was.

  • very nice indeed

  • lol, look who is using intel cpu's now! good video, very nostalgic

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more