Slip of the tongue?

[wahmpee]

look how small the whole is!!! its in front of a freakin garage door!!! not even the same place as all the other shanksville news footage!

[NHMoldInspector]

I would assume it meant pull the firemen out but the explosions in the video was not played in the public video...suspicious, though the attack could still have been Bin Laden, but to drop it without getting everyone out is fuct

[didleybopp]

This is an excellent collection of clips, a couple of which I had never seen before. Thank you for putting it together. I will send to my friends in the truth movement.

[XSVterror18]

Dont you you think that if the towers were to go down by a Plane they would go down on impact? But they didnt now did they. Supposedly Jet fuel which burn at about 2,000 degrees and Steel which has a melting point of 3,000 made the building collapse. I find that extremely hard to believe. The twin towers are the only buildings in History that have Collapsed from being hit by a plane. I mean the plane practically disappears apon impact. How could that knock down a building?

[mrzeegrr]

Pull it means to remove firefighters.

[didleybopp]

@mrzeegrr Wouldn't that be "pull THEM"? Silverstein is not a firefighter and he is not talking to a firefighter and his audience is not made up of firefighters. So why would he use some confusing jargon repeatedly, saying it over and over again, if he was trying to convey that he gave the command to remove firefighters. It is completely obvious, with knowledge of neither firefighting slang nor demolition vocabulary, when you watch the video that he means "pull the building down". NO question.

[jonros1369]

just the pillars being cut in a 45 degree angle is enough to acknowledge the presence of thermite and the fact these were simply false flag attacks, sad but true, war is a lie , the rich profit from both sides a few cia informants reek havoc, foreigners are placed in the hot seat, Governments gain leverage and take rights and institute new regulations. It's getting old and tired. Tell others and spread the truth!!!End the fed!

[blicky2blacky]

Commting crimes on other nations for it's own self interests but would never commit crimes on it slef. America is too patriotic for that and it would be illogical and condtradictory and there for im plausible so why are there so many conspriracy theorist diots!!!?

[sksnkton]

@blicky2blacky oh no the USA wouldn't dare hurt its own people other people yeah but not its own (sarcasm) just in case you do not read back what you type.

[blicky2blacky]

The us army have a very anal proceedure of "leaving no man behind" yet people belive the us goverment would kill it's own people to send soldiers over to wage a war where "no man would be left behind". I'm Irish and I'm not idiotic to think any American goverment in the history of american goverments would commit such a crime on it's own people nad still uphold a policy of "n onw gets left behind". All americans are too patriotic to commit such a thing. Americans are guilty of...

[10thprestigeful]

IT WAS CLEARLY BLOWN YOU HEAR THE EXPLOSION BEFORE IT FALLS AND I MAY SAY IT FELL BEAUTIFULLY PERFECT INTO THE GROUND CLEARLY CUTTERS WERE USED AND THERE WAS EVIDENCE FOUND OF THERMITE AT ALL 3 COLLAPSES AND THE BLACK BOXES 3OF4 FOUND NEVER RELEASED THER CONTENTS I COULD GO ON AND ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[paymydues]

Apparently there was a lot of government files and evidence and maybe even the controlling of those twin tower flights from that building.What a convenient way to destroy such evidence.

SO MUCH eveidence against the US governemnt and NO evidence for their explanation.Yet so many still BELIEVE what they were told! SHOW us the evidence..............PROVE it was terrorists.You can't.

[indibabs122275]

cheney is the one who voted thumbs down on this video.

[TheYazoo321]

it take's day's to set up a demolition so it must have been planned well in advance!

[2020starman]

I didnt know firemen were demo specialists

[exposetruthwolf]

hy did the building owner spend Jan-July 2001 making sure his Trade Center Insurance policy paid double for acts of Terror, then Silverstein pocketed a nice $7.1 Billion while his company had paid only $10 million of their 99 year lease, that's a $7bill&90 mill dollar profit, I'll bet Silverstein in Grateful to Al Quida. Hurry up and bite it Channey and Rumsfeld.

[atamalakolive]

@exposetruthwolf He got shot down for 7.1 billion, he only got 4.6.  Was that part of the plot? Also, acts of Terror area covered, it is Acts of War that are not covered (insurance company tried not to have any coverage, court ruled it was not a "country", so not an Act of War). You post is nonsense.

[filmerado]

Cheney was referring to the 1993 attack perhaps?

[dold1tflkin]

1jewish owner+ 2huge insurance prophit = 911

[scoretosettle]

then we made the decision to blow this fucker up just like we did with the towers 7 hrs earlier

[ratskan]

People hear what they want to hear. So what if it was a Govt, cover up? "IF" this were true, as a society this is our fault, we allowed / allow the Govt to do everything they are doing and will con't to do in the future. I believe our own Govt would never do this because they too were raised as Americans in America. People believe what they want to believe

[Shikyou]

Anyone who defends these constant slip ups is stupid. And a kissup to the Gov...

[ocerg1111]

um i have no reason to 'dismiss the cheney comment' lol

[smujismuj]

The first one from Silversteiin is the only compelling 'slip' of these three in my opinion.

The second one is slightly interesting, but nothing too important on the evidence tree.

The Cheney comment is dismissible, hardly worth noting, in my opinion.

And the last bit is old news...already established by Jones and Griffin.

[aBTOHorizon]

Lets assume "pull it" does mean demolish building rather than pulling firefighters out, I don't see much of a crime in the case of WTC-7 anyways. Its relative obscurity can't really be used to support any false flag plot and its collapse didn't cause any loss of life. As for the claim of the convenience destruction of documents...most of the building was on fire anyways which wouldve destroyed most of these papers. If it didn't, then the fire would have certainly granted a realistic excuse.

[aBTOHorizon]

All the WTC-7 collapse did was cause massive financial losses for Silverstein:

WTC-7 Insurance Payout: $861 million

Loss of investment - Remaining mortgage: $400 million

Cost to Rebuild new WTC-7 structure: $700 million

Cost to re-finish interior: $500 million

Cost to restore Verizon building: $1.4 billion

That's not including cleanup, Fiterman Hall de-reconstuction and the property tax-base rent for 6 years (at no return) on some of the highest valued property in the US.

[gunthaarz]

@aBTOHorizon You do not understand the property business. Silverstein does not have to cover any of that. Any rebuilding costs is done through an investment group. The loans are made at almost zero interest from investment banks that get to do fractional reserve banking. If they can create 800 million dollars their member banks can loan out 8 billion and get interest on those 8 billion. Furthermore S. bought a lease on some buildings, and cashed out ten times the amount in less than a year.

[aBTOHorizon]

@gunthaarz

SilverStein properties is that investment group...The outstanding $400m mortgage came directly out of the $861m settlement and as the leaseholder/developer & shareholder, the remainder went towards rebuilding. Silverstein did receive a $475m - 0% interest loan (Liberty bond) to cover the remaining expenses. (but these aren't handouts). Silverstein pays $103-m per year to Port Authority in base rent. WTC7 is the only building that's yielding a return and it's not even at capacity.

[gunthaarz]

@aBTOHorizon again, I can guarantee you he is not the only one in the investment group, and that we never get to know all the details on how anything is financed or where all the investment money comes from. Silverstein does not need to turn any _huge_ profits, he is just a participant along with others who gets his share for playing his part. 2the "age argument": Has age _ever_ prevented rich guys from being old a**h*les? Pol Pot, Stalin, Mafia bosses, none stopped just because they were old!

[aBTOHorizon]

Stalin was a statesman and I won't fancy the idea you have any clue of what real mafia bosses are like. The age argument is relevant here because we're not talking about immediate or even 4-5 yr turnarounds. If Silverstein agreed, invested and coordinated an inside job, then he would've calculated when he could expect monetary gains. But all you can propose is the possibility of ghost investors (as if they're the missing link on how to capitalize off leveling multi-million dollar skyscrapers)

[aBTOHorizon]

@gunthaarz

Well your guarantee is good enough for me! Let's skip any presumption of innocence and assume Silverstein was guilty of conspiracy - insurance fraud etc. If money is the alleged motive, I'd think there would need to be a substantial return for taking on such a gamble. But I'm not suggesting there needs to be HUGE profits - the problem is, from my calculations, he's absorbing massive fiscal losses as a result of the 9-11 attacks with no indication of landing in the green anytime soon

[gunthaarz]

@aBTOHorizon Well, you might as well try to explain complex "financial instruments" like "synthetic CDO's " , or try to explain why there is ten times more currency around in the world than can be mirrored in real assets. Furthermore you would have to understand and have a complete and accurate picture of all parties involved in all operations, and I do not believe for a second that such a complete picture is even remotely possible for any outsiders anymore. New "regulation" notwithstanding

[aBTOHorizon]

Not too familiar with this fractional reserve banking business - details regarding the WTC reconstruction isn't confidential though. Perhaps you could crunch the numbers and let me know how Silverstein could have actually BENEFITED from the WTC7 collapse. Where is he turning a profit here? He's pushing 80 yrs old and most of the WTC site won't start earning revenue for another 5+ years. When will everything come full circle to reveal the collapse was in fact a financial gain for Silverstein.

[Cincy911Truth]

Excellent video. Than you.

[DarkMonkArt]

Ya That's right.

We've got to kill those Well educated people, Those pesky intellects, and Artists, protesters, and what the heck ALL FREE THINKERS.

Wile we're at it people with eyes in there F***KING Heads.

People that care too, ya those caring open minded Folks that didn't move on after such a tragic and horrible thing like this happened (like jurgitall did) that changed the way we live. Our Rights, Hopes and FREEDOM went down with those towers ( I think jurgitall/Iraq did it lets get him )

[jurgitall]

you idiots are really grasping at straws now. Your mother needs to be slapped for dropping you out.

[elryn]

great vid

[accersitusmaximus]

Fact: Buildings do NOT suddenly collapse at free fall under constant acceleration unless no resistance is offered (according to NIST themselves).

Fact: Buildings do NOT collapse symmetrically, unless all structural support is removed almost simultaneously.

So, what can cut 80 steel columns on 47 floors within seconds?

200.000 tons of structural steel!

No resistance!

Think about it.

WATCH?v=V0GHVEKrhng

[Rickdeckard2020]

Great comment accersitusmaximus

as for slips, a great one thats missing is the one in which a admin/pentagon officials says something 'missile hit the pentagon'

What Im wondering is when a majority of people realize the gov and media are lying, but both gov and media go on as if their BS is true, what then? (at least people will realize the media is propaganda)

[atamalakolive]

@accersitusmaximus The Towers did not fall at free fall, or even near free fall. You can clearly see free falling debris 30-40 stories ahead of the collapse. And the Core remained standing for 15-20 seconds after collapse. Plus the Towers has no columns in entire Interior Space. Symmetrical tube in tube. No surprise it would fall symmetrically. There was resistance, but since there were no columns in Interior Space it was not much. But enough to prevent "free fall" as it was not free fall

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive ''Core remained standing for 15-20 seconds after collapse'' ''no columns in entire Interior Space.''

nice bit o crack your smoking on there?

nr free fall, simultaneous structural failure across multiple floors, a collapse isn't progressive if the building topples at near free fall speed.

[atamalakolive]

@sksnkton There are videos of the collapse timeline, as well as videos of the core standing after the collapse. Do your homework before accusing me of smoking crack. It was not even close to free fall. How the hell can there be free falling debris 30-40 stories ahead of the collapse if it was near free fall? Duh. And yes, NO columns in the entire Interior Space (between Core and Perimeter). All FACTS. It's been 10 years and you still have no clue what happened, Amazing.

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive ''no columns in entire Interior Space.'' LIES! you are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts! there are main structure columns running up the length of the building.

[atamalakolive]

@sksnkton Man you are ignorant. The Towers were a tube in tube symmetrical construction. Between the Inner Tube of columns (the Core) and the Outer Tube of Columns (the Perimeter) there were NO COLUMNS you moron. THAT IS CALLED THE INTERIOR SPACE OF THE BUILDING. You don't understand basic construction terminology.  You are an imbecile. Again. THERE WERE NO COLUMNS IN THE ENTIRE INTERIOR SPACE, and that was the part that collapsed first. DUH.

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive your wrong calculate the height and count the seconds, it is near free fall speed maybe one second of resistance which is basically the rubble in the way that hasn't been blown out of the path of least resistance yes thats right, there is no evidence of the core left standing there is smoke and dust from the explosions covering any core that might be there but i doubt it just convenient for you to say so it fits your progressive collapse theory? are you a believer of that?

[atamalakolive]

@sksnkton There are videos on You Tube showing the core standing. Just search for "core still standing Towers". And also google Towers not free fall. THERE ARE VIDEOS ON THIS SHOWING A REAL TIMELINE. You look at some video from far away that shows half the collapse hidden. You are getting your chain yanked. Explain how they fell at free fall when there is free falling debris 30-40 stories AHEAD of the collapse. JUST EXPLAIN THAT BASIC AND BLATANT FLAW IN YOUR IDIOTIC THEORY.

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive you explain how fire NOT exceeding 120 C watch, Newly Released FLIR Footage of Twin Towers blows up tons of rubble and turns 200,000 tones of steel to dust first.

[atamalakolive]

@sksnkton What the hell are you watching. Some camera from 1/4 mile away? You can clearly see an inferno in the building. People jumped to their deaths. The temperature of a flame is 1000 C. This is BASIC SCIENCE. Fireman ON THE GROUND said they could feel the heat from the fire, and heat RISES you moron.

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive Fireman ON THE GROUND said they could feel the heat from the fire, and heat RISES you moron. bahahahaha (link me a video of such claim and i will show you a lair) there is transcript of a firefighter last words (RIP) trying to tackle the blaze with 'two lines' he was a very experienced 20+ years if it was 1000C he would not of made it even close lulz put down the crack pipe.

/watch?v=nU1WqEYEMBQ 'two lines'

/watch?v=HofARNpDcL0 fires not exceeding 120C

[atamalakolive]

@sksnkton That quote was from a guy in a stairwell (isolated) a few floors below the impact point. Did you know that the WTC Towers were big buildings? There are photos galore of the MASSIVE infernos on those places caused by all the petroleum based products (plastics, VCT, mastics, etc.) burning. Stop selectively taking things WAY out of context when reality shows you are full of BS.

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive outer facade have seen the full length tape and your link cuts short doesn't show it falling straight down which it does few seconds after your link stops, 'MASSIVE INFERNOS' still haven't watched that new FLIR footage released by the FBI that debunks that statement? they did not exceed 120C.

again watch.. /watch?v=HofARNpDcL0

those debunker site are old news been there, done that, didn't buy anything though.

[atamalakolive]

@sksnkton That thing is measuring the temperature at the outside of the building. If it was measuring inside the building it would read much hotter. How can the outside of the building be the same temp as the inside. It only shows one reading, and that is the "face" that it sees. Otherwise it would have to show a "range". If you point that at a close oven at 450F, it will not read 450 F. It will read the temperature outside the oven. C'mon man, get with it.

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive if the steel in the building was 1000C to reduce it's strength by 50% the building would be glowing like a christmas tree so when the camera is pointed at the gaping whole where the main / only fire is what is it reading then? the face that isn't their? what it shows is two localized office fires starved of oxygen burning no hotter than 120C.

[atamalakolive]

@sksnkton No, it loses 50% at 500 C. Please pay attention. And shooting from the ground you don't get a shot of the inside of the building 90 stories up. You get surface temp. Again, a flame is 1000 C. Are you denying their are flames in there? Get real man.

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive 'surface temp' '90 stories up' what are you implying the camera man is filming in 120C heat? 

[atamalakolive]

@sksnkton The temp at the outside of the building. From a quarter mile away.

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive The temp at the outside of the building. From a quarter mile away. yeah sure ok, OBL and 19 men from desert autocracies pulled strings on wall st while planning 911 pulled it all of with absolutely no inside help, NORAD just happened to be out the neighbourhood that day practising for events such as 911 all the while claiming its responsibility didn't match the criteria required, evidently failing to act, i'm just an attention seeking whore and a lair, your government want 1/2

[atamalakolive]

@sksnkton NORAD was not watching domestic air travel, the FAA was. There were only 14 fighter jets on Alert in the Continental US, and they were not scrambled until FAA notified. FAA was confused to say the least.  Recall two weeks ago one of their guys was ASLEEP and two jets could not contact them. That is AFTER 9/11. 175 notification came only 13 minutes before crash. Plus when transponders were turned off, you had to pick hijacked planes out of 4,500 in the air. Sound easy?

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive you to be free, fluoride in your water supply is good for your teeth, and red white and blue shines out of your bum, now go back to work pay your taxes, and watch out for terrorists, elect an official that will not promise you ideologies but protect you from falsehoods, falsehoods you WILL believe because the opinion is packaged for you on your corporate media is money well spent, no more than a paid for presentation, is that what you want to hear? nice easy conclusions?

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive you don't change the evidence to suit your theory, /watch?v=_CK2WAH78Ew&playnext=­1&list=PL8725E6B556F0BF2A

[sksnkton]

@atamalakolive

Fact: Buildings do NOT suddenly collapse at free fall under constant acceleration unless no resistance is offered (according to NIST themselves).

Fact: Buildings do NOT collapse symmetrically, unless all structural support is removed almost simultaneously.

So, what can cut 80 steel columns on 47 floors within seconds?

200.000 tons of structural steel!

No resistance!

Think about it.

WATCH?v=V0GHVEKrhng

accersitusmaximus 1 year ago 18

[atamalakolive]

@sksnkton THE CORE REMAINED STANDING, AND IT WAS NOT AT FREE FALL. MAN YOU ARE DENSE.