Harry Potter and The Sorcerers Stone IN 10 minutes

[dubbelfriz123]

FACKING NICE!

[TooMii18]

I'm picturing the Harry potter when he Was little on ipode scren camera yay

[MadonnaHusbands]

We were surprised that HP and the Deathly Hallows part 2 is already leaked. We enjoyed the whole thing on watchharrypotter. us

[BurritoTown]

thats really cool that you could get the entire plotline in that short video i wish i was that talented xD

[greeneyes99]

Also, I have a question for Americans: doesn't it bother you to know that the version of the story you bought from the store IS NOT the original format?? I also heard that American publishers 'translated' British slang and so forth. (Correct me if I'm wrong!)

I don't know but that would piss me off. I have the original format and it seems laughable that any of it would have to be 'translated'.

I understand it's out of your control, but I'm just curious how others see it...

[CannedKoolaid]

@greeneyes99 naaa i dont think so. The book still uses weird name calling words that idk what they mean and ron still says bloody all the time

[khfan4ever9]

As I was saying the stone was a horcrux but was destroyed and is (spoiler?) in the snitch Harry has but can't open.

And the cloak Harry has had the whole time. Those are the Deathly Hallows.

[CannedKoolaid]

@khfan4ever9 ok nice, thank u very much. ive been confused as balls

[2010gymnastninja]

@khfan4ever9 thats wrong tom riddles stone of the ring is the one inside the snitch and its also the 2nd hallow and dumbledore gave harry the cloak cause he already knew wat was going to happen .

and the philosiphers stone was only destroyed because it was one of the many way in witch voldemort could return so nicolas and dumbledor aggreed to destroy it . the starts harry potter and the camber of secrets...

[khfan4ever9]

@2010gymnastninja The Gaunt's ring IS Tom Riddle's ring... He is their descendant. And that's what I said...

So don't correct me when i'm right :P

[2010gymnastninja]

@khfan4ever9 sorry that was my cuzzin she was on my account while i was cooking a chocolate cake .mmm chocolate..

[darrenshanluver]

@2010gymnastninja way to fail at spelling cousin

[khfan4ever9]

Hmm I don't think my whole comment posted... Dang iPod apps... I'll fix it later xD

[khfan4ever9]

Responding to all you confused people about the Deathly Hallows:

The Peverell brothers were the brothers in the story. Harry's family was descended from the last brother, who passed the invisibility cloak down through the guys of the family.

So at the end of the first part of 7:

1) the elder wand is now in Voldemort's possession because he stole it from Dumbledore's grave (who took it from Grindelwald after a duel)

2) the resurrection stone is the stone that was on the Gaunt's ring which was a

[2010gymnastninja]

@khfan4ever9 ill continue your explanation

... horcrucs made by tomm riddle who didnt realise it was the resurection stone ...

thank you and good bye

[honeyfish]

@minibabybelle12 no the stone is the resurrection stone. the sorcerer's stone was destroyed first year.

[hollylynn91]

This is great! I haven't seen all of the sorcerer's stone, just parts of it. So this was helpful because now I don't have to watch the whole movie. :) thanks!

[heyheyheyheyhi14]

I have a Question for the people who have either [Read/Watched] the Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows [Part 1].

When they show the 3 brothers and 'Death' granting them items for not dying over the Lake...

They Give #1 'The most powerful Wand'

#2 'A stone that brings deceased relatives/friends back from the grave'

#3 'A Cloak to escape [Death] /Invisibility..

Now you can only recieve those from being related...

Harry has the Cloak as shown in this

Dumbledore has the wand.

Now how about Vold.?

[honeyfish]

@heyheyheyheyhi14 no you dont have to be related, that is just the reason why harry has the cloak. in the story you know how the owner of the cloak gave it to his son? it was passed down from father to son and that is how harry came to own it. dumbledore has the wand from defeating the previous owner and voldemort is going to steal it from his grave only to be the owner of the wand. he doesnt know about the hallows at all, he just knows about the all powerful wand.

hope this helps :D

[2010gymnastninja]

@honeyfish SPOILER FOR DEATHLY HALLOWS PART2 ...but the wand wont work properly for voldie cause snape killed dumbeldore but it was a planned death and earlier the elder wand was expeliarused by draco so in truth the wand belongs to draco so after voldie kills snape he thiks itll work properly but nagimi the snake kills snape so thats a big glitch

[honeyfish]

@2010gymnastninja didnt wannt give it all away but yes there it is lmao

[2010gymnastninja]

@heyheyheyheyhi14 your rong only the cloak is passed through the family the wand is erned by killing or defeting the previous owner the stone can be anyones and tomm riddle made it a horcrucs but didnt know it was the resurection stone .k

[Jskrasnove]

@minibabybelle12 hoopla?! :D HOOPLA!!! HOOPLA!!

Lol.

[Jskrasnove]

You should do the whole movie in parts. :( I've been searching all over and can't find anything on Youtube.

[charlieiscool1000]

oh my God ITS PHILOSPHERS for gods sake damn americans

[3GMX333]

i can't believe it, it was a really good job

[fizshazi]

I uploaded pt 1 of chamber of secrets check my chanel!

[parkour2sk8]

Amazing books, okay movies, and best fans

anything i miss? :D

[mckfrr]

The Harry Potter saga is almost complete, just one more year. kinda sad, no more sexy voice of Alan Rickman's Snape lol, oh yeah and cute Harry.

[aarolye]

i'm watching the philosopher's stone version and hermione says her lines more harshly in tone and movement at 5:28.

[condeguga]

@aarolye you mean... this is a different version? what other differences does it also have?

[aarolye]

@condeguga there's one for u.k. and one for america. in the u.k they say "philosopher's stone" whereas in american one they say "sorcerer's stone".

[greeneyes99]

@aarolye just so everyone knows - in Canada it's referred to as the philosopher's stone in both the book and movie. We tend to get grouped in with the US for dumb things like this, but thankfully, not in the case of Harry Potter :)

[SuperParker94]

@greeneyes99 Haha I know! I find it strange everytime they say "Sorcerer's Stone" because to me, it has always been Philosopher's Stone!

[kodochaiscool1]

@condeguga No it's not rlly a differant version. It's just instead of Philsopher it's called Sorceror here in America. Since most of us dont know what Philospher is.

[snuckoo]

@kodochaiscool1 Nowadays, most people learn that in grade school! I'm in middle school, even I know that.

It's sort of offensive to us Americans, but whatever.

[kodochaiscool1]

@snuckoo I know it is stupid. I'm in 6th grd. and have known that since probably 2nd

[harrypotter777888]

Cool!

[JungleOasis]

Despite the fact that the first two films seriously lacked proper direction, acting and.. atmosphere really, some of ideas I really miss in the later films. Like getting into Diagon Alley, and the..goblins?..at the bank, getting actually onto the platform 9 3/4, the sorting, Percy... Madam Hooch, Harry standing on his broom - he seemed a far better Quidditch player back then, the general wacky and unique ideas like the giant chess game and insect keys. And holy fuck looking back at the end scene

[JungleOasis]

where Quirrels head collapses and that was a G rated movie - whereas today they're marked as 12a and they're complete crap with no horror whatsoever. And what I don't understand is, Dumbledore sounds like he already knows about the Horcruxes here when later he claims he doesn't. So if he's not talking about THAT, then what IS he talking about? By memory like in HP2? But even that was a Horcrux in a book.

I also miss the Bertie Botts every flavour beans =/

[mizkex]

I think it's the other way around. The first 2 films were done right. They really captured the spirit of the books. Then it became all this emo, hot topic, marketing crap. Where ever single scene has horrendous dark Green/blue/Aqua color scheme. Then they focused on the ugly back side of Hogwarts where the clock tower and old rocks shooting up from the ground. Then they moved Hagrids cottage to that ugly mountain!

[JungleOasis]

Damn... that's.. very difficult to argue with. I've just rewatched the films and they seem much, much better now. I think at the time they seemed a bit bad as the kids were roughly my age, and it seemed like they were trying to act and couldn't.

Now it's like everything you just said. And it's actually making me look back at things in the first films as early hints, even though nobody knew the full story at the time. It is a shame they got rid of the robes and school costumes.

[JungleOasis]

Mind you the books have changed as well. Here's something interesting to ask your opinion on.

After the third book, the writing style changed in every single book. A lot of people think that after the third book Rowling didn't write them herself... I have to admit even though the fourth book was much more Harry Potter, they got rather crap from there on.

[mizkex]

Well it all depends on where a franchise starts. Because the Film adaptations started off with Chris Columbus, it's we expected to see for the whole film series. The same goes with a book series, TV series, video game series, etc. Often the 1st volume is the one we desire most because it's familiar and were comfortable with it. It's the standard we set ourselves with. I really don't like the way the evolved the film series. While it is appropriate to use dark imagery, it's just overused......

[mizkex]

And much of the set, especially the exterior, has been either changed or forgotten. Older or original locations are shown little to never. I don't like the newly focused areas used since POA, it's to dark and rugged.

[mizkex]

Tainting film color to a critical amount always upsets me. How everything in Twilight (which I hate) is this dark, and drained of color, aqua marine. The light hitting objects and character's is all the same, over saturated, unnatural and overpopulated color(s). Most films have done this or used colors which/lighting are not realistic.

[mizkex]

Finally, it's the originals that make us think of specific and in some cases better times. The first potter films make me think of my childhood and my stepbrother, (who started my interest in the series) Plus I think of the early 200's/late 90's a much more enjoyable time of entertainment. Plus due to the evolution of the internet and technology Companies have found ways to implement there products in an overly annoying way, ITunes, and the website which this message is written on

[peterly91]

Thanks for posting this

[crisis1991]

Where can I find the whole movie?

[scholars12345678]

nice..

[N3tballKwl]

that was very good for just 10 minutes

[gennre]

this movie is really good!

[NekoChanSenpai]

My scar senses are tingling! *grabs head and winces* :)

[aarolye]

the sorting hat part was funny~

[fallenxfeather]

Cool! This is great.

[jaydember]

Wow, it's amazing how you got rid of over 90% of the movie and yet the story is all there. Good job!

[cre8ivelicense]

Why they call it sorcercer when its isant the same thing as a PHILOSOPHER.

[rpbaur]

it was that in england, but jkr thought americans wouldn't know the story of the philosophers stone, so she agreed with scholastic 2 make it the sorcerer

[miniclipfuzz]

A little late since you commented ages ago but the american publishers (You know how they have different cover art and the change spelling of "football" to "soccer" and "fringe" to "bangs) thought sorcerer would sell better to american cutlure. no idea why.

[157nnfgyu90lybf]

ive done goblet of fire in 20 minutes and doin order of the phoenix their on my channel.

[bubblesdew6]

there so tiny lol

[crylaige]

draco(tom felton) look kinda funny.

hahaXD..but really cute..he creeped out and screamed when that creature appeared!!haha..really good!hahaXD

[crylaige]

yea..really..great summarizing:D

there are some little parts missing in this but then it's coolXD..

i actually got it:D

[kalie1414]

Thats good and cool !

[fitbikeridr51]

AMAZING!!!

[Ynnah203]

Man why don't you just put part 1 pt 2pt3 and well you get the idea

[rodriguez140]

4 real

[SweetRaven7]

well i dont really care bout the name...

[griffin512]

genius

[1999UTD]

why did the yanks have to be different!!!

its PHILOSOPHERS STONE!!!!!!

[Panjab319]

tom  is kinda cutee

[kwr5]

i like how the old one dresses I wish the new one could dress like that instead of thatblue thing they let him wear

[jediking12]

great!

[Murasaki312]

Draco is cute...LOL!

[123ultrastar]

Draco is kinda evil...

[darrenshanluver]

@123ultrastar no he's not he's just confused because of everything his dad told him but then his conscience is at the same time contradicting those views.

[irith56]

i like the new dumbledore.i really dont like the old!thats my opinion...

[wade2bosh]

..why did hermione settle for Ron?

[stephanie220508]

whatcha mean?

[lollipopyumness]

aww i wish the old dumbledore stayed shame he died :( but yer good job *clap

[kaethebar]

wow. that was the whole film in just 10 minutes!!!

[puppylove166]

they look soooo adorable =]]

[darknessrulesall16]

LOL!!!

It looks so random without all the in between stuff.

XD

It makes me laugh how the scenes just skip...-shrugs-

[tittiit]

ah they're so TINY :D XD

[harryslover123]

thanx post the 4 n 5th in 10 mins too

[dokakara]

no one can understand this! just consider it as a trailer...

[Harvest4]

Wow...I haven't seen this movie in so long or read this book. imo this and the chamber of secrets are just...lame compared to books 3-7 and the movies 3-5. Maybe it is just cause everyone is so young in these and they feel really kiddy. At book 3 the movies start getting dark and everyone seems to be more than just some little kid. If I hadn't started reading these books at such a young age I might never had started them.

[Autosmiler]

well done!

[glamourhoneys]

they look so funny in this

xD

[winchesterfan08]

Nice job with this video. :D

[spshq]

looks like that actor didn't go through puberty at that time eh?

[jediking12]

ok in the U.K. its called Philosopher's Stone

in America its called Sorcerer's Stone

[HPobsession22]

Good. But... just not the same.

[jimmydebas]

That's not the whole film. if somebody had never seen the movie, they would have no idea.

[bensillifant]

very good very good but y u call it the sorcerers stone?

[hoopinado]

scholastic or something changed philosopher's stone to sorcerer's stone.

[aljaesson]

The editors thought that the American readers would think the book was to complex if it had "philosopher's" in it, and "sorcerer's" sounds better for kids

Only in America!

[jasmine95758]

wow

i forgot about this film thank you!! but how did you do that?

[Leon61294]

Harry sounded like a girl... XD

[a4finger]

wow nice, 2 hours in 10 minutes

[Stravaganza4ever]

I love it, very well done.

[utot2x]

thanx!

[ilooklikeanidiotha]

excelent. I love Harry Potter. Thank you XD

[Sayo7MaE]

HEhehe this is great -too much information- hehehe i like it!

[karkar19]

very cool! 5/5, i love this movie!