I love how the officer in the Civil War part yells "charge!" and only a couple of guys do it. Even he stays behind the wall, so it seems like he was playing them.
if the game would be as same as the movie that would be awsome but instead no they just created a cheap and not expansiv game i hate those who is doing better trailers than the regulariy games =(
me encantó el juego, es como el 2do pero con mejora de gráficas y arreglo de ciertos conceptos, me quede jugando con el 3 porque el 4 no me gustó mucho, la escencia del 2 y 3 es realmente buena, te hace pensar mucho sin necesidad que halla tanta acción, excelente juego, saludos :)
i guess u have no knowlege about history huh u little 8 year old. ghana, mali, songhay,zimbabwe they were all great black civilizations that can field hundreds of thousands of soldiers.
it wasn't the Civil war, if you didn't notice (not trying to be rude) the rifleman has the form of a Civil War soldier. The man in the officer hat (cowboy hat) was irrelevant, it could have been the officer of the riflemen (like when they hit elite)
it might not have been specificly the civil war but more rather the age of colonization but i think it they should have put a reference to WWII in there
Actually, not really. Right before the Civil War was the Industrial Revolution. If not for the Industrial Revolution, we would not have watermills, windmills, factories, or even interchangeable parts (interchangeable parts is the idea that things are made of parts that can be easily replaced). World War II, on the other hand, did not 'revolutionize' anything.
@dot12321 World War II revolutionized machinery (flight, ground, and tools) missile technology (jets, rockets), and it led to nuclear powerplants (and bombs), we learned how to mass produce those heavy machines, a space race which would not have happened without it, and it produced some of the greatest leaders this world will ever know. There are countless things that came out of wold war and two. Both of them have shaped our present much more than you know.
@xXStupidHurtsXx Thats not what this intro is about, it is about ages in civilization, not compared to the real world but ones you create in your game, therefore it is not the civil war in america shown but something compared
@Modolie I am portuguese and even I can see that's the American Civil War. Definitely not Europe and much less any other place of the world during the 19th century. The uniforms, the guns and the "Charge!!!" with american accent gives it away.
@xXStupidHurtsXx not at all the civil war is called the first modern war for a reason. Outdated tactics mixed with new technology specifically rifling led to a death toll that more than doubles all of our others wars combined and forced an overhaul in the way wars are fought. Besides there was the whole slavery thing.....
"Outdated tactics mixed with new technology" sounds exactly like World War II. Remember the fighting in the desert? The British called that "A First World War battle fought with Second World War weapons." And the death toll was WAAAAAY higher-- on the order of 45 million.
@xXStupidHurtsXx Actually, I'd argue that World War one influenced warfare more than World war 2. First widespread use of machineguns, first widespread use of aircraft, first widespread use of tanks, etc.
@xXStupidHurtsXx I can't be sure, but it looks like the part after the civil war where it shows a factory mass-producing items is supposed to represent WWII
@xXStupidHurtsXx The American Civil War had Americas highest death toll from any war. Plus that revolution marked a change of government. All WWII really did was speed up some tech, and introduce that Hitler was a racist in a position of power. Not to disrespect people who fought and died in that war.
@Timmehbob I don't want to bag you to much because i understand your mentally retarded but you do realize there are other nations besides the united states right?
@yamumisac0w It's like you read my comment backwards. I said nothing about the other countries, but that doesn't mean I completely forgot other nations. Simply the US. For the record though; I'm Canadian.
@Timmehbob No you just said that it had a higher american death while WWII had the highest of deaths of anyway and no change in the american goverment but several changes in goverment for other countries civil war only effected america (more or less) so wwii was obviously more revolutionary
@Timmehbob your still doing it i insult u while still on topic u just rant on what ever u can trying to create a new argument whether am a hypocrite or can spell does change the fact that wwII was a more influencial war then the american civil war and in your argument you only consentrated the the efftects to america
@Timmehbob I didn't misunderstand anything u no one including you ever mentioned the fact that we were only considering in a american point of view you just went right in to saying that the civil war is more Revolutionising then wwii then later on you claim that you were only referring to america but this still amkes no sense why would you be doing this no one else was only applying stupidhurts' statement to america only so your arguement still makes no sense
@Timmehbob my god your an idiot thats back peddling u can't say something then claim afterwards you were for no paricular reason excluding all other courntries plz tell me why you would only referrs to americans point of veiw when considering what was more significant in the history of our entire planet
@AnswerManofRome Oh hell yea, I totally forgot about that. There was not much hype about it like there was with Halo. Have you played it, and if so is it cool?
@TWCGroup Ok well I am not a hard core fan so I don't deserve to give my opinion. I only have Civ 3 so from my standpoint Civ V is heaven. It looks pretty I played the demo and it is nice and simple. I am definitely getting it eventually. I would suggest it but there are so many great games coming out you should think over what you like best. From me 5/5. :) (Based off of what I have watched on Youtube and played in the demo)
No. The gameplay of Civilization isn' based solely on warfare as the Total War series. Fans always suggest to cram as many features from other titles they like into their favourite game turning it into a bloated mess lacking a focus, while they don't realize it'd be potentially destructive.
It should be an option wether you would like to proceed with tactical combat or simply resolve the battle automatically as it already is. Nothing wrong with that option.
@TWCGroup that would be too complex and turns would take way too long. Turns take too long in Total Wars already if you play all tactical battles in the endgame.
@KoreaEatCat I could have swore that I posted somewhere that those tactical battles should be OPTIONAL. Think about a very critical/decisive battle in the game that involves losing your capitol if you lose. You wouldn't want to micromanage that one battle?
@TWCGroup I'd feel the developers wasted their time adding the extra 15 gigs or more of features for something I won't even do. For one I don't think anyone would get to the point where you're down to your capital in a civilization game; how the hell would you win? Even if a total war game, during single player how many times do you get that epic battle situation; especially if the game spans 6000 years? Running out of characters so my point is smashing two genres of good games doesn't work.
@Empeinmortal I freely admit that it would. Only for hardcore total war/civ nerds. Of course you could always have the option to just auto resolve any fights like CIV does by default.
@TWCGroup sure! that would be cool! but hey, now I must admit I'd love to test a tactical combat between a Tank unit with a Pikemen one. I love challenges
@TWCGroup Oh sure.....one game would take too long since you will have at least a few attacks every turn. And the already faulty combat system in a lot of the civ games are where you can attack tanks with your infantry and just see them shoot the tanks and kill them. Now how would that work in real time? Actually it might work with some other technique rather than shooting bullets but how are you going to put how many people are in one unit for each unit? It's nearly impossible dude.
Funny I played Rome total war for about 4 months, completely abandoning Civ 3 because right then it was boring as heck. Then I found Rome to be boring, got it modded(R:TR, awsome!!!) now I'm going back to Civ(+Rye's and Fall of Civ MOd)
For free or money? Mofungames has it. For $ and to have your disc, the IGN site has direct to drive, or you can just go to gamestop and get the box set.
i mean for 100% free. My friend used to have it but he destroyed the disc. I don't want to get it on ebay or something so where can i get it str8 from the internet and be able to play it for free?
Civ IV is good, but not as good (or easy to Mod) as Civ III. I'll prefer the modding of Civ III - with XML encoding, but would prefer the graphics and quality of gameplay in Civ IV. I wonder if they'll make a Civ 5?
Yea, as happens so often, they took a good game and threw on too much fluff. The graphics are awesome, but there are little things which make up for them(in a bad way). There is no clear indicator as to how units are doing in battle and city displays can be a bit convuloted. There are alot more wacked-out aspects which I won't go into. After a few frustrating hours of Civ IV, I went back to the old goodness.
Very cool trailer. It showed the age timeline, from ancient to roman to medieval to the civil war and then finnally to the Space age. Thumbs up for this vid.
lol, this ones a bit better then civ 4. Empire at war has a really nice combat system but it takes a long time
joss7758 1 month ago
this is by far the best opening i was so sad when they changed it in conquest
braytac 8 months ago
This is my favorite Civ opener, but Civ IV Original has the coolest song, and Civ III Original is the most nostalgic =)
SirSanje 9 months ago
I love how the officer in the Civil War part yells "charge!" and only a couple of guys do it. Even he stays behind the wall, so it seems like he was playing them.
Paeremannen 9 months ago
Still stewing over my veteran Cavalry and veteran RIder getting beat by ONE regular Spearman.
filthyswit 10 months ago
i like the 4th one the best
jellomanjello 10 months ago
My favorite of all the Civilizations' openings.
MakotoUrl 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Remember when you go to your youtube page and there wasn't an advertisement at the top of the page?
Remember when music videos were uploaded by users and not VEVO
Remember when there wasn't advertisements that never go away?
Remember you couldn't have a limit to favorites?
Remember the famous yellow subscribe button?
WE MISS THE OLD YOUTUBE!
Post this in every video and lets start a youtube riot!
Originally made by GlassPaperBag
Thumbs up to keep this at the top!
anamarvelo 11 months ago
Guys, I lost my CD for this game! :(
LucasSyrup 1 year ago
@LucasSyrup that must suck.
IlersichProductions 11 months ago
@LucasSyrup You can download it, like me.. ;)
andreshawk13 10 months ago
Is there any way to have two or more golden age in a game? I had only one per game, i think there is a way to trigger more .)
pls someone reply
Ggyurikka 1 year ago
@Ggyurikka you can have golden age only once, in Civilization 3. No mods can change that.
kknots 1 year ago
Comment removed
yamumisac0w 1 year ago
I was so disappointed when I installed Conquests after Play the World, and I lost this intro movie... THIS one is amazing.
WaywardSquire 1 year ago
I still get goosebumps every time I watch this.
Bobchillingworth 1 year ago
0:14 giggity
Herbstgespenst 1 year ago
@Herbstgespenst =_=
AnswerManofRome 1 year ago
Where's the fighter jet that flies by? Must be the other intro lol.
You gotta have the MiG-29 fly by!!!
Agent1W 1 year ago
@Agent1W
That is Cililization 3 complete :-D
Znork96 1 year ago
@Znork96 How obvious! It's not 'Complete' unless you get that fighter jet flyby. THAT'S what makes it 'Complete Edition'.
Agent1W 1 year ago
if the game would be as same as the movie that would be awsome but instead no they just created a cheap and not expansiv game i hate those who is doing better trailers than the regulariy games =(
loppan109 1 year ago
@loppan109 you just dont understand civ... go play aoe
zubatzu 1 year ago
me encantó el juego, es como el 2do pero con mejora de gráficas y arreglo de ciertos conceptos, me quede jugando con el 3 porque el 4 no me gustó mucho, la escencia del 2 y 3 es realmente buena, te hace pensar mucho sin necesidad que halla tanta acción, excelente juego, saludos :)
oODragonOo 1 year ago
This was def the best of the three Civ 3 intros
MrJohnnyBQuick 1 year ago
xddd :)
krzychu250198 1 year ago
My favorite game intro of all time.
acanthopleura 1 year ago
@acanthopleura i agree this is the best this game was better than civ IV too i love industrial start(scenario) i lost my disk though
XEMARICANX 1 year ago
omg this is the BEST game ever (counting video games, board games, and sports)
chincherrinas 2 years ago
I feel like playing Civilization III now. Good thing I have the complete edition.
PandM324 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Blacks didn't have civilization. I am sorry guys. :'(. but they never had any. :) so sad.
SuperKLC 2 years ago
i guess u have no knowlege about history huh u little 8 year old. ghana, mali, songhay,zimbabwe they were all great black civilizations that can field hundreds of thousands of soldiers.
lifes40123 2 years ago 12
What the fuck dude?
pedarikarhu 2 years ago
Undoubtedly the greatest Civilization introduction of them all. The transitions between each time period are so seamless...
StoanPhrogg 2 years ago
here is what i do and LOSE
I use technology
Trade alot
have soldiers
conquer cities
stop anarchy
get owned
and last...
DIE
videonfan 2 years ago
One of the best intros ever. I find the 'war without end' theme in the middle quite moving.
MarshCountryErrant 2 years ago
IT looks a lot like the rise of nations intro.
shootanputan 2 years ago
Dude I totally agree with you! especially the begining!
Deadarmie12 2 years ago
EPIC INTRO!
Mesina2 2 years ago 3
it wasn't the Civil war, if you didn't notice (not trying to be rude) the rifleman has the form of a Civil War soldier. The man in the officer hat (cowboy hat) was irrelevant, it could have been the officer of the riflemen (like when they hit elite)
Lordpenguinworshipor 2 years ago
Looked like Union Soldiers to me. :/
rockoownz 2 years ago
Jó a dallama ! Főleg a gitáros résznél .
tiberiusz2 2 years ago
Did they forget WWII in this intro? I think that revlutionized things a little more than the civil war.
xXStupidHurtsXx 2 years ago 68
it might not have been specificly the civil war but more rather the age of colonization but i think it they should have put a reference to WWII in there
Kapu54 2 years ago
Actually, not really. Right before the Civil War was the Industrial Revolution. If not for the Industrial Revolution, we would not have watermills, windmills, factories, or even interchangeable parts (interchangeable parts is the idea that things are made of parts that can be easily replaced). World War II, on the other hand, did not 'revolutionize' anything.
dot12321 2 years ago
it actually did, in both missiles and planes technology (by the germans and robbed by allies and soviets after war as over)
kingdodongo5 2 years ago
the industrial revolution was after the civil war and the stealing native american lands.
lifes40123 2 years ago
@dot12321 World War II revolutionized machinery (flight, ground, and tools) missile technology (jets, rockets), and it led to nuclear powerplants (and bombs), we learned how to mass produce those heavy machines, a space race which would not have happened without it, and it produced some of the greatest leaders this world will ever know. There are countless things that came out of wold war and two. Both of them have shaped our present much more than you know.
xXStupidHurtsXx 1 year ago
@xXStupidHurtsXx Thats not what this intro is about, it is about ages in civilization, not compared to the real world but ones you create in your game, therefore it is not the civil war in america shown but something compared
Modolie 1 year ago
@Modolie I am portuguese and even I can see that's the American Civil War. Definitely not Europe and much less any other place of the world during the 19th century. The uniforms, the guns and the "Charge!!!" with american accent gives it away.
PTphoenixUK 1 year ago
@xXStupidHurtsXx Oh absolutley. If it weren't for WWII, we could still have nazi's on this planet.
usedtobeemo 1 year ago
@xXStupidHurtsXx not at all the civil war is called the first modern war for a reason. Outdated tactics mixed with new technology specifically rifling led to a death toll that more than doubles all of our others wars combined and forced an overhaul in the way wars are fought. Besides there was the whole slavery thing.....
XxSn1p3rS0ULxX 1 year ago
@XxSn1p3rS0ULxX
"Outdated tactics mixed with new technology" sounds exactly like World War II. Remember the fighting in the desert? The British called that "A First World War battle fought with Second World War weapons." And the death toll was WAAAAAY higher-- on the order of 45 million.
Nikifuj908 1 year ago
@xXStupidHurtsXx Actually, I'd argue that World War one influenced warfare more than World war 2. First widespread use of machineguns, first widespread use of aircraft, first widespread use of tanks, etc.
smsteve888 1 year ago
@xXStupidHurtsXx I can't be sure, but it looks like the part after the civil war where it shows a factory mass-producing items is supposed to represent WWII
Apherax 1 year ago
@xXStupidHurtsXx The American Civil War had Americas highest death toll from any war. Plus that revolution marked a change of government. All WWII really did was speed up some tech, and introduce that Hitler was a racist in a position of power. Not to disrespect people who fought and died in that war.
Timmehbob 1 year ago
@Timmehbob I don't want to bag you to much because i understand your mentally retarded but you do realize there are other nations besides the united states right?
yamumisac0w 1 year ago
@yamumisac0w It's like you read my comment backwards. I said nothing about the other countries, but that doesn't mean I completely forgot other nations. Simply the US. For the record though; I'm Canadian.
Timmehbob 1 year ago
@Timmehbob No you just said that it had a higher american death while WWII had the highest of deaths of anyway and no change in the american goverment but several changes in goverment for other countries civil war only effected america (more or less) so wwii was obviously more revolutionary
yamumisac0w 1 year ago
@yamumisac0w That's opinionative.
/Conversation.
Timmehbob 1 year ago
@Timmehbob Yeah by people who arn't idiots
yamumisac0w 1 year ago
@yamumisac0w Thank you, I do enjoy being reminded of my at-least average intellect.
Also; Aren't*
It's grammar.
Timmehbob 1 year ago
@Timmehbob right dude try an change the subject becasue you can't win the last one nice job mate
yamumisac0w 1 year ago
@yamumisac0w You resorted to insulting me. Lol.
Hypocrite much?
Timmehbob 1 year ago
@Timmehbob your still doing it i insult u while still on topic u just rant on what ever u can trying to create a new argument whether am a hypocrite or can spell does change the fact that wwII was a more influencial war then the american civil war and in your argument you only consentrated the the efftects to america
yamumisac0w 1 year ago
@yamumisac0w I clearly stated it was important to America only. Why are you still ranting on this?
Timmehbob 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Timmehbob @yamumisac0w You never stated that but i am glad to hear your admitting your wrong thank you
yamumisac0w 1 year ago
@Timmehbob GOOOD mate so you are amitting u were wrong thats all i wanted
yamumisac0w 1 year ago
@yamumisac0w Admitting,* and no, I'm not.
I'm saying you misunderstood me.
'Mate.'
Timmehbob 1 year ago
@Timmehbob I didn't misunderstand anything u no one including you ever mentioned the fact that we were only considering in a american point of view you just went right in to saying that the civil war is more Revolutionising then wwii then later on you claim that you were only referring to america but this still amkes no sense why would you be doing this no one else was only applying stupidhurts' statement to america only so your arguement still makes no sense
yamumisac0w 1 year ago
@yamumisac0w Actually I DID mention that I was referring to America's point of view. It was in my second post.
You'z blocked nao, boi.
Timmehbob 1 year ago
@Timmehbob my god your an idiot thats back peddling u can't say something then claim afterwards you were for no paricular reason excluding all other courntries plz tell me why you would only referrs to americans point of veiw when considering what was more significant in the history of our entire planet
yamumisac0w 1 year ago
Comment removed
yamumisac0w 1 year ago
@xXStupidHurtsXx World War 2 was at 1:05. Well, more the assembly line, but it took place around WWII.
GFedFan 1 year ago
@GFedFan lol, a response 1 year later
SirNoodlehe 1 year ago
@xXStupidHurtsXx Ah but you're forgetting that the Civil War was American. And we all know the more American, the better.
hello1182 7 months ago
What is the factory creating in 1:00?
IxARExBACK 2 years ago
Nem mindegy?
tiberiusz2 2 years ago
The perfect game would be civilization V with a Total War combat engine when you go into tactical combat.
TWCGroup 2 years ago 87
@TWCGroup with age of empires 3
mrroco300 1 year ago
@mrroco300 Not sure what you mean. That's what Age of Empires 3 is like?
TWCGroup 1 year ago
@TWCGroup have you ever played it
mrroco300 1 year ago
@TWCGroup Yeah but you would need the perfect machine to run it...
iOnlySignIn 1 year ago
@TWCGroup xD Civ 5 is out now thats pretty cool.
AnswerManofRome 1 year ago
@AnswerManofRome Oh hell yea, I totally forgot about that. There was not much hype about it like there was with Halo. Have you played it, and if so is it cool?
TWCGroup 1 year ago
@TWCGroup Ok well I am not a hard core fan so I don't deserve to give my opinion. I only have Civ 3 so from my standpoint Civ V is heaven. It looks pretty I played the demo and it is nice and simple. I am definitely getting it eventually. I would suggest it but there are so many great games coming out you should think over what you like best. From me 5/5. :) (Based off of what I have watched on Youtube and played in the demo)
AnswerManofRome 1 year ago
@TWCGroup And you forgot Master of Orion? :D What if u combine all 3 games?
Hmm, the tactical combat may be like in Rise of Nation, without the economical side, it would be a bit less demanding for your system :\
ZenithF 1 year ago
@TWCGroup
No. The gameplay of Civilization isn' based solely on warfare as the Total War series. Fans always suggest to cram as many features from other titles they like into their favourite game turning it into a bloated mess lacking a focus, while they don't realize it'd be potentially destructive.
ekszentrik 1 year ago
@ekszentrik
It should be an option wether you would like to proceed with tactical combat or simply resolve the battle automatically as it already is. Nothing wrong with that option.
TWCGroup 1 year ago
@TWCGroup The turns in that game would last forever!
kirbsmeister2 1 year ago
@TWCGroup that would be too complex and turns would take way too long. Turns take too long in Total Wars already if you play all tactical battles in the endgame.
andriyyi 1 year ago
@TWCGroup I prefer Civ 4 to Civ 5. I truthfully think it's much better.
GFedFan 1 year ago
@GFedFan civ 5 exists!!?!?!!?!!
SirNoodlehe 1 year ago
@SirNoodlehe Came out Sep 21, 2010
GFedFan 1 year ago
@TWCGroup I'd be absolutely annoyed to have to do a TW combat every time I want to fight barbarians or attack a scout.
KoreaEatCat 1 year ago
@KoreaEatCat I could have swore that I posted somewhere that those tactical battles should be OPTIONAL. Think about a very critical/decisive battle in the game that involves losing your capitol if you lose. You wouldn't want to micromanage that one battle?
TWCGroup 1 year ago
@TWCGroup I'd feel the developers wasted their time adding the extra 15 gigs or more of features for something I won't even do. For one I don't think anyone would get to the point where you're down to your capital in a civilization game; how the hell would you win? Even if a total war game, during single player how many times do you get that epic battle situation; especially if the game spans 6000 years? Running out of characters so my point is smashing two genres of good games doesn't work.
KoreaEatCat 1 year ago
@TWCGroup You must admit it would be the longest game ever
Empeinmortal 8 months ago
@Empeinmortal I freely admit that it would. Only for hardcore total war/civ nerds. Of course you could always have the option to just auto resolve any fights like CIV does by default.
TWCGroup 8 months ago
@TWCGroup sure! that would be cool! but hey, now I must admit I'd love to test a tactical combat between a Tank unit with a Pikemen one. I love challenges
Empeinmortal 8 months ago
@TWCGroup Oh sure.....one game would take too long since you will have at least a few attacks every turn. And the already faulty combat system in a lot of the civ games are where you can attack tanks with your infantry and just see them shoot the tanks and kill them. Now how would that work in real time? Actually it might work with some other technique rather than shooting bullets but how are you going to put how many people are in one unit for each unit? It's nearly impossible dude.
MsAngelication 6 months ago
in civ III: conquests they use one of those roman soldiers in part of the opening
jjwings12 2 years ago
The part with the Roman soldiers is really cool
JustShoveJayOhBe 2 years ago
the civil war part is cool
EasterEgg159 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fraxis dumbed down civ series to insulting levels. Microprose is LOLing. Even Activision's Call To Power is better than this.
madcows10 2 years ago
Shut up. Civ III is the best Civ ever made.
ImMaxi 2 years ago 5
i have the original version (which sucks to most i geuss) but i like domination victory its funner longer but much funner
pwnmaster77 3 years ago
This intro is amazing and inspiring...makes me happy every time I watch it... =3
pmcsoy 3 years ago 5
Comment removed
pmcsoy 3 years ago
brings back memorys of how fun it was before i realised how predictable AIs were on Sid even, i miss those days..
LordMeire 3 years ago
I've never seen video and music match so perfectly together =D
Lappalingur 3 years ago 3
Exactly, that's how I see it as well : )
Dactylius 2 years ago
cheat for Civ III = trade any civ for 2 with as many 0s as fit (like 2000000 or something)PER TURN and click DEMAND and it will always work.
loge999 3 years ago
nice intro.
beautyful music!
sermann123 3 years ago 5
lol, that thing at the end, its not the alfa centauri space ship, noooo... its an ICBM surrounded by grain silos. yeah thats it...
Lmaster20 3 years ago
i have civ3 complete, does that mean it has the expansions?
calapanpo 3 years ago
what do u rhink complete means...yes it comes with all of the expansions
spartanman2448 3 years ago
Funny I played Rome total war for about 4 months, completely abandoning Civ 3 because right then it was boring as heck. Then I found Rome to be boring, got it modded(R:TR, awsome!!!) now I'm going back to Civ(+Rye's and Fall of Civ MOd)
cyphtersteeling3825 3 years ago
where can i download rome total war?
Brianbays 3 years ago
For free or money? Mofungames has it. For $ and to have your disc, the IGN site has direct to drive, or you can just go to gamestop and get the box set.
cyphtersteeling3825 3 years ago
i mean for 100% free. My friend used to have it but he destroyed the disc. I don't want to get it on ebay or something so where can i get it str8 from the internet and be able to play it for free?
Brianbays 3 years ago
Comment removed
Lotias 3 years ago
personally i think civ 4 is slightly better
except in music and cinematics. civ 3 had awesome music. but i missed wonder movies...
screwthehelloff 3 years ago
you are right it is better, i love the stone quarry! i aslo love the mods! awsome! and the fact that you can change the name of the units!
hmsjrorg 3 years ago
I am ADDICTED to this game. i think i played at least once a day everyday this whole summer.
supb123 3 years ago
Civ IV is good, but not as good (or easy to Mod) as Civ III. I'll prefer the modding of Civ III - with XML encoding, but would prefer the graphics and quality of gameplay in Civ IV. I wonder if they'll make a Civ 5?
Bangra7 3 years ago 2
Yea, as happens so often, they took a good game and threw on too much fluff. The graphics are awesome, but there are little things which make up for them(in a bad way). There is no clear indicator as to how units are doing in battle and city displays can be a bit convuloted. There are alot more wacked-out aspects which I won't go into. After a few frustrating hours of Civ IV, I went back to the old goodness.
Fish880 3 years ago
Yeah, its a darn shame I gave Civ III to my twin brother.
Bangra7 3 years ago
Hahaha! Yeah, just go get it back, it was yours originally =P
Fish880 3 years ago
My twin brother is stubborn.
Bangra7 3 years ago
you guys are brothers. why dont you share?
blackcomet81 3 years ago
We do now. He doesn't even use it. (Such a shame.)
Bangra7 3 years ago
lol one guy died with out getting hit with a sword
lordofthenachos 3 years ago
civ 3 is the best version so far,
fjghh9e8r 3 years ago
i wish people still played this online
A10pilot617 3 years ago
I still play online. But I play with C3C
tommytoxen 3 years ago
ill have to get that then cuz single player is getting boring
A10pilot617 3 years ago
AWSOMENESS!!!! i liked it up to the space shuttle part
pwnmaster77 3 years ago
what can u not do if u dont have this expansion pack
sam8404 3 years ago
hmmm the complete edition has different video didnt know that
Darthdude604 3 years ago
nice games i play it :)
K0L0S91 3 years ago
waz the song-its cacthy
danuisortiz 3 years ago
I think civ3 has better videos than civ4 does.
Cyberspine 3 years ago 4
I think civ 3 is all around better personally
pyramidcrate 3 years ago 2
Very cool trailer. It showed the age timeline, from ancient to roman to medieval to the civil war and then finnally to the Space age. Thumbs up for this vid.
Vassilli117 3 years ago
Industrial Revolution was also in there.
ShiviesProductions 3 years ago
Wow thats a nice video.
If only I had that expansion pack lol.
I use the editing future for super fun,
although my computer isn't strong enough
to handle strong edits.
but this is a great game,
With a great video!
killslasher 4 years ago
WAR=Empire=Power!
LordOfTheHall 4 years ago
i bought dis 4 mac the regular 3
youtubrcris 4 years ago
i dont provoced war here in civilization 3 i just make peace and trade world map 2 theme
RockMeTal08 4 years ago
i started playing. i got a slight idea but i wonna b better. does anyone know any sites or anythin that can teach me b better?>.
TheDrumG0d 4 years ago
nicee
Wushu4U 4 years ago
cool. I only saw arts of it in the civ 3 complete intro
eekiepower 4 years ago