something is fucked up considering an e92 m3 stock does a 13.7 quarter mile. This is a 1/4 KM and the time was 14.9. For those that cant convert a 1/4 mile is .4 km. SO a driver who knows what he is doing covers almost twice the distance in a second less. I agree though most evenly powered gt to m3. gt wins straight line but gets powned (on average) in anything that isnt a straight line drag
The Fail in the title is also 1/4 "mile"- it's a 1/4 Km which is longer. The BMW driver bogged her launch, her higher trap speed in the 1/4 shows she was gaining pretty fast.
the day i would respect american cars is the day you are going to build the same wieght and power range of a european car and race one,but as long as you keep putting 18wheeler inefficient engine in beer cans and call it technology your cars would never sell outside of the US,so keep driving those sluggish stiff fucks around,see you on the tracks and on autbahns you might shine from reds to reds but you ass in ours on tracks and highways!
gt 500 make 14.2 on the 1/4 milies no fucking way is a regular mustang gt and the driver in the bmw suck I do the same time with my hyundai sonata 3.3 auto there a problem!
@maxyac1 - NO GT500 is that slow... Most are high 12s - low 13s on stock tires (they just spin), high 11s - low 12s on drag tires. Regular 4.6 GTs (stock) typically run high 13s - low 14s in the 1/4. If you're used to a Sonata, you'd sh!t a brick riding in my GT500... :)
@oldlugs is what I say a bmw m3 e92 14.9 sec there something wrong and a mustang gt500 14.2 is impossible a REAL gt500 do under 13 sec and for my sonata I am able to do 14.9 on the 1/4 and the bmw m3 of this video do the same time there a big problem here the driver is drunk or I dont know what!
this is kinda crazy, the m3 driver sucks ass and the mustang is a GT, i ran 13.5 with my mustang GT, and the m3 should do alot better then that, like 12.8.
I'm a BMW guy but you need to give credit where it's due. Ford is stepping up their game. I also read an article in Motortrend or Car & Driver recently where the Mustang really did hold it's own against BMW. Even won in some tests. 10 years ago this would be unheard of. What is really exciting is that this will push the Germans to take it to the next level! Ahhhh... Free market competition. We, the consumer, will be reaping the rewards.
@MustangsCanTurnToo I concede to you. Just read Autoweek or some similar mag where they put the Pony GT against an M3. Pretty much even stats. Right across the board, with the Mustang better in a couple of areas. The M3 set the standard for years and in many ways is still the car to beat but Ford definitely are doing something right.
That isn't an M3, I seriously doubt a real M3 wouldn't trap at least 100mph no matter how bad the start. That's just a 3 Series with some M3 fender grilles. That GT had heavy-ass 20" wheels on it! That 99mph trap speed reflects it. I trap 102mph bone stock at 13.9 with a lousy 2.16 60 ft time.
The mustang missed a shift and the M3 driver still couldnt keep up even though he had a 100hp advantage. This race is decided by the M3 driver sucking.
The Shelby's or the Rousch Stage 3's would rape a stock E92 for sure. But a standard mustang GT would have absolutely nothing on the E92. Well that's not fair...the new 5.0 mustang GT does 0-60 in 4.4-4.5 seconds. Still the E92 does it in 4.1 seconds. Much closer race than against the 4.6l GT's anyway.
I agree though with a few guys and would take an M3 over the GT500 as well. I would take a 2008+ LS3 C6 or C6 Z06 over an M3 though because they are BMW killers going straight and even more on turns.
I don't care if John force is driving the E92 M3 on slicks, it would never run11s bone stock. It has 2 character flaws, weight and no torque. The GT500 benefits from drag radials and slicks because the brute torque it makes roasts any street radial. So with a good tire, it launches like something blew up in the trunk. As far as turns, go look up the Virginia International Raceway times for the E92 M3 vs the 2011 GT500.
comparing the M3 and the Mustang is like comparing bruce lee to mike tyson, one is one powerful it straight punches but lacks finesse, im sure on a track with turns the M3 could easily beat the Mustang
@CGH1105 i cant you are right, but if i could i would get a ford GT. if i was gunna be a rich asshole i would be a rich asshole in a ford gt, not in a generic bmw 3 series.
I'd rather drive a BMW then push a Ford. Go see how many people just in America alone have died in Ford's. My friend sold them and I asked him, "How the hell do you sell these pieces of shit?" He said, " if they're dumb enough to buy them, I'm smart enough to sell em and rip em off." He showed me how many people have died just in California and it made me sick. Go get your ZERO percent APR and see if that comes with a funeral insurance. FUCK FORD!! I'd drive a FIAT first.
@tomgunc You're just a fucking idiot. Stop talking like u know about cars u know shit, bc. u probably drive a piece of shit. Stop typing 3 pages of shit, nobody cares
@tomgunc Go Suck a dick motherfucker and stop replying on everybodys comments nobody gives a fuck about your fucking opinion, Stop Replying to people u fucking faggot
@tomgunc More people have died in Fords because theres a ton more of them in the US compared to BMWs. I'll take an 03/04 Cobra over an overpriced sedan any day. Seriously, BMW owners think they are better than everyone else until they get smoked by a good old American made Terminator.
Actually it's a Shelby GT, not the gt500. In 2007/2008 there was a limited production shelby gt. The shelby GT came stock with 319 hp. Basically a Mustang gt with a cold air kit and shelby hardware on the outside. Still a nice car though.
Looks like a Mustang GT to me. Sounds like one too there is no supercharger whine! Sure ain't no GT500 that's for sure. Oh well closer race this way but I don't know if the M3 needs a driver mod or something. M3's are nice and all but if that was a GT500 it wouldn't have been close at all in a straight line anyway!
Actually, both the E92 M3 and the GT500 run about a 12.6-12.7 in the 1/4 mile, with a slight edge to the Mustang, so they'd actually be neck and neck.
However, give them a turn and the Mustang's in trouble.
That M3 driver is awful for sure...14.9...lol...I could pull that in a Camry.
First, this was shot in 2008, so we're not talking about the new 2010 GT500...lol
Second, most reported times for even the 2010 model shelby are in the low to mid 12 second range, not much faster than a stock M3.
But you obviously missed my point, which was that neither of those cars were well raced and should be much faster, although I agree it's a GT, not a Shelby.
@MN12BIRD wrong an e92 m3 does consistent 12.7 sec 1/4 mile. Gt500's do only a little better at 12.4 sec. Pretty sad considering an m3 is down about 100hp and tons of torque.
@aieljose GT500's might only do 12.4 on the stock tires but everyone knows they can do WAY better on slicks. Stock GT500's with slicks have hit mid 11's so... yeah. Besides I also said the M3 needed a driver mod didn't I? This M3 ran slow and that wasn't a GT500. Everyone knows that's not a GT500. I don't know what it is but it's not a GT500. They were both slow.
@MN12BIRD yeah a gt500 might do mid 11's on slicks but don't you think an m3 could do similar times on slicks too? you cant compare a car with slicks vs one on stock rubber. Stock vs stock a gt500 wins by a little, not alot.
@aieljose Yeah best I've seen a stock GT500 do with slicks was 11.3 and I'm sure a stock M3 could do high 11's on a good run with slicks. Faster sure but not a huge difference. I understand the M3 is lighter and I like the E93 M3's quite a lot. Hey in a corner we both know what car would win! I was mainly peeved at this video for claiming the Mustang to be a GT500 when it clearly has GT badges on the side and no GT500 graphics. It doesn't look like a GT500 one bit.
Come on that bmw driver cant drive for shit his acceleration at start was crappy> Horrible driver for beautiful machine> But BMW will destroy mustang in curves on a real track BMW Power
well when an everday driver takes a car to the strip they will not run what the pros run in the mags. this could have also taken place in a higher altitude which will cause the times to be higher. driving a car on a strip is nothing like the street and very few people are able to run a good 1/4 mile their first time out.
quit bring the old "put these cars on the track with lots of turns" saying. this is drag racing. u dont buy a mustang to handle. u buy a vette or a cts-v. quit complaining. mustang ate that m3
Sounds like the yavol crowd is whining and holy excuses. A loss is a loss. Bmw crowd says take it to the twisties to kick a Mustang Gt's bum but alas this race was on a drag strip. Once the whiners get a little older they will learn that to lose a race/game etc life does not end. Go Ford. Oh and before people reply with the
Ford junk read Consumers Report and they will differ with the junk opinion,
look at the video, it seems like the bmw slowed down for a second. try to fing more vids like this BMW is always winning. there is something fishy about this race. Shelby GT500 is a great car.
Designed for high speed driving on tracks/roads courses that have BENDS. Finely tuned suspension, lightened bodies and balance to offer a rewarding driving experience. NOT for fucking drag racing shitbox muscle cars (small cock substitutes).
Why even bother? If you want to fuck a muscle car try a winding back road.
yes i think so but rememberthe SHELBY is a muscle car and in drag races NO chhance for the BMW,but if they test drive in circuit the shelby sucks man..bmw is like snake when you drive it in a track..
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
M3 is way faster then Mustang GT500 it all depends on the driver.this vedio shows that the driver of M3 didnt know what he was doing.BMW AND Mersedec are the top car's and you guys should know that
that is not a GT500, u think u know obout cars check the video again, tha is a mustang GT with some mods. the shelby GT500, 500hp,mustang GT 300hp. look it up.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I raced a new cobra in my 135i at a traffic light. I got 1/2 cars on him out of the box and kept it to about 65. We got to the second light and I got a whole car on him and kept it until the same. The GT500 would have beat me in the 1/4 mile as long as the road was straight. I could buy two 135i for what a super snake costs.
that stang whiped that m3 or 335ci if it was a stock 335i ya thats about right but m3 no way and you can ad the m3 pakage to the 335ci for 3k not the engin just the body kit
mustang is the best car, bmw is peace of s...t
MultiCrazyjoker 3 weeks ago
@MultiCrazyjoker fuck you
pwnagefuk 3 weeks ago
something is fucked up considering an e92 m3 stock does a 13.7 quarter mile. This is a 1/4 KM and the time was 14.9. For those that cant convert a 1/4 mile is .4 km. SO a driver who knows what he is doing covers almost twice the distance in a second less. I agree though most evenly powered gt to m3. gt wins straight line but gets powned (on average) in anything that isnt a straight line drag
salaznyc 4 months ago
I love because a Mustang beat a BMW all of you Import lovers start making excuses. The m3 lost get over it.
BrandonDurkeeMusic 4 months ago
The Fail in the title is also 1/4 "mile"- it's a 1/4 Km which is longer. The BMW driver bogged her launch, her higher trap speed in the 1/4 shows she was gaining pretty fast.
mykulc 5 months ago
@mykulc
You dumb? 1/4km is far shorter than a 1/4mi
chbrules 5 months ago
@chbrules HA HA me not dumb, me say wrong word. :D
mykulc 4 months ago
WOW this place must be way above sea level.
TheDartblockstang 6 months ago
mustang is tuned bmw is stock :P
IObott 6 months ago
BMW WINS
MrAdidasStylez 6 months ago
the day i would respect american cars is the day you are going to build the same wieght and power range of a european car and race one,but as long as you keep putting 18wheeler inefficient engine in beer cans and call it technology your cars would never sell outside of the US,so keep driving those sluggish stiff fucks around,see you on the tracks and on autbahns you might shine from reds to reds but you ass in ours on tracks and highways!
kay19833 7 months ago
@kay19833 really buddy? 2012 boss 302 look it up, it beats the audi r8 v8 on a track
Storm7289 7 months ago
@Storm7289 That's because the Mustang is stripped out and was designed to go around Laguna Seca.
Hello6761 6 months ago
@Hello6761 so what its a 40k car thats still just as good on any other track
Storm7289 6 months ago
@kay19833 True...
CroAuslander 6 months ago
@kay19833 yujellyho?
ralatorre9 2 months ago
big GT badge on side of stang lol good thing it wasnt a cobra!
sledneck999 7 months ago
it's a mustang GT and the soud say to me it is superchargered
pepedani4 7 months ago
@drifter12593 yea, a 335i with over 500 hp to the rear wheels, that could smoke any mustang
335ipower11 7 months ago
@335ipower11 there are plenty of mustangs that could smoke you. why dont you quit being so ignorant. there are always faster cars out there.
drifter12593 7 months ago
Mustangs are for fags
335ipower11 8 months ago
@335ipower11 youre talkin shit and you drive a 335i?
drifter12593 7 months ago
that was still a fast mustang...
1badmofostang90 9 months ago
That's NOT a GT-500; just a Mustang GT with some mods.
oldlugs 9 months ago
@oldlugs
Yep agree...My boss has a GT500....and the one in this video is not one
scott93257 9 months ago
gt 500 make 14.2 on the 1/4 milies no fucking way is a regular mustang gt and the driver in the bmw suck I do the same time with my hyundai sonata 3.3 auto there a problem!
maxyac1 10 months ago
@maxyac1 - NO GT500 is that slow... Most are high 12s - low 13s on stock tires (they just spin), high 11s - low 12s on drag tires. Regular 4.6 GTs (stock) typically run high 13s - low 14s in the 1/4. If you're used to a Sonata, you'd sh!t a brick riding in my GT500... :)
oldlugs 9 months ago
@oldlugs is what I say a bmw m3 e92 14.9 sec there something wrong and a mustang gt500 14.2 is impossible a REAL gt500 do under 13 sec and for my sonata I am able to do 14.9 on the 1/4 and the bmw m3 of this video do the same time there a big problem here the driver is drunk or I dont know what!
maxyac1 9 months ago
Comment removed
maxyac1 9 months ago
Not a GT500. Idiots.
taemian 1 year ago
hey cunt fuck do the world a god damn favor and jump off a cliff while i give your mom a dick meat sandwich
orangebananaman12 1 year ago
Fail. This was just a GT with a bodykit, maybe a CAI and an exhaust. Though still a decent race.
toyoracing89 1 year ago
you fucking fail dude this a gt
guitarpro48 1 year ago
FORD rulls !!! fukk bmw =))
djbruni 1 year ago
@djbruni
fukk u!
SergiuSe 1 year ago
@djbruni another failer in youtube :)
Rockerniga 1 year ago 3
FORD rulls !!! fuck bmw =))
djbruni 1 year ago
Sigh... not the race I was expecting to see.
sh1znack 1 year ago
this whole video is horse shit and should be deleted.
Sforschondetta 1 year ago
this is kinda crazy, the m3 driver sucks ass and the mustang is a GT, i ran 13.5 with my mustang GT, and the m3 should do alot better then that, like 12.8.
pkidro 1 year ago
Comment removed
pkidro 1 year ago
this is a ford GT not even close to the GT500
Detoro17 1 year ago
Yeah, as others have said, thats a Mustang GT. Even says so on the side of the car.
cgc 1 year ago
I'm a BMW guy but you need to give credit where it's due. Ford is stepping up their game. I also read an article in Motortrend or Car & Driver recently where the Mustang really did hold it's own against BMW. Even won in some tests. 10 years ago this would be unheard of. What is really exciting is that this will push the Germans to take it to the next level! Ahhhh... Free market competition. We, the consumer, will be reaping the rewards.
freedomchicago 1 year ago
The m3 should of won. the mustang soounds tuned and the m3 looks bone stock. m3 would eat up a mustang on the track any day
PoRuskiKyle 1 year ago
the mustang is stock, they both suck at driving. I did 13.5 with my mustang, the m3 should do 12.8 . but both drivers cant drive for shit
pkidro 1 year ago
14 sec? both werent race? im sure hyundai sonata or camry did 14 sec
Devastationable 1 year ago
Cloned GT500- I didn't hear no whine from the supercharger. Trust me if a 2011 5.0 can run down a M3 a GT500 would smash it in the quarter mile.
JayGeePee1 1 year ago
Not a Shelby.... You would hear the whine, and no snake or GT500 markings. It does have the obvious GT marking. FAIL title.
3RBRoach 1 year ago 21
Not a Shelby.... You would hear the whine, and no snake or GT500 markings. It does have the obvious GT marking. FAIL label.
3RBRoach 1 year ago
Straight line is one thing. Try throwing the mustang around some corners and you'll see why the M3 is the better car.
mgfaxlad 1 year ago
@mgfaxlad The BMW is $60,000+. I'd hope it corners better.
FPSWordle 1 year ago
@mgfaxlad So I took my mustangs around some corners and the M3's couldn't catch me. I must be doing something wrong :)
MustangsCanTurnToo 1 year ago
@MustangsCanTurnToo I concede to you. Just read Autoweek or some similar mag where they put the Pony GT against an M3. Pretty much even stats. Right across the board, with the Mustang better in a couple of areas. The M3 set the standard for years and in many ways is still the car to beat but Ford definitely are doing something right.
mgfaxlad 1 year ago
mstangz burnzzzzzzzz bmw
skulldude97 1 year ago
Go back and learn your cars.
sphinx77449 1 year ago
Now lets see who wins on the track >.>
SIRKGM14vg 1 year ago
@SIRKGM14vg The 2011 Mustang GT can take the M3 on a track. It's shocking, I know.
normalais 1 year ago
@SIRKGM14vg Mustang wins
MustangsCanTurnToo 1 year ago
That isn't an M3, I seriously doubt a real M3 wouldn't trap at least 100mph no matter how bad the start. That's just a 3 Series with some M3 fender grilles. That GT had heavy-ass 20" wheels on it! That 99mph trap speed reflects it. I trap 102mph bone stock at 13.9 with a lousy 2.16 60 ft time.
06gtdriver 1 year ago
The mustang missed a shift and the M3 driver still couldnt keep up even though he had a 100hp advantage. This race is decided by the M3 driver sucking.
arabiansensation 1 year ago
uhm yeahh thats a mustang gt.. and stock besides a hood and wheels.. and some shitty driving on both cars
streetballn226 1 year ago
The Shelby's or the Rousch Stage 3's would rape a stock E92 for sure. But a standard mustang GT would have absolutely nothing on the E92. Well that's not fair...the new 5.0 mustang GT does 0-60 in 4.4-4.5 seconds. Still the E92 does it in 4.1 seconds. Much closer race than against the 4.6l GT's anyway.
Theologist 1 year ago
yes man what you think...mustang is always more better than M3 (fk car)
flamurbeqir 1 year ago
this is gt not gt500 !!
aqeelssss 1 year ago
That's not even a GT500, It's just a GT.
MrCudaKyle 1 year ago
I agree though with a few guys and would take an M3 over the GT500 as well. I would take a 2008+ LS3 C6 or C6 Z06 over an M3 though because they are BMW killers going straight and even more on turns.
Marc99GT 1 year ago
@Marc99GT M3 is faster than any corvette on a track
blackXSpr 1 year ago
@blackXSpr Your ignorance is clearly showing.
Marc99GT 1 year ago
@blackXSpr If you take the time to look at track times for both it might help you stop spewing nonsense.
Marc99GT 1 year ago
I don't care if John force is driving the E92 M3 on slicks, it would never run11s bone stock. It has 2 character flaws, weight and no torque. The GT500 benefits from drag radials and slicks because the brute torque it makes roasts any street radial. So with a good tire, it launches like something blew up in the trunk. As far as turns, go look up the Virginia International Raceway times for the E92 M3 vs the 2011 GT500.
Marc99GT 1 year ago
sounds like a Automatic GT to me...
sdc2008 1 year ago
That is just a standard GT.
xLuckydemonx 1 year ago
Still would take a //M over a GT500
turbotdi2002 1 year ago
i think the driver in the m3 was drunk or something. no way should that beat it that bad.
ihateedgekids 1 year ago 17
@ihateedgekids i agree, plus thats no gt500. looks like a gt with some beauty parts
mrtriplesix 1 year ago
@ihateedgekids i beat an m3 before with my gt mustang.. r u saying he was drunk too?
gent226 6 months ago
ouch pretty embarrassing for that bmw haha
volcom13xx 1 year ago
comparing the M3 and the Mustang is like comparing bruce lee to mike tyson, one is one powerful it straight punches but lacks finesse, im sure on a track with turns the M3 could easily beat the Mustang
CGH1105 1 year ago
@CGH1105 roush trak pack anyone?
ghoststang4point0 1 year ago
Thats a gt mustang 4.6 crushing that m3.
Hey bmw fags theres drag strips all over the USA costs about $40 to race. and road courses you can do track days at.Whats up?
red1098 1 year ago
@red1098 niga, bmw owns u and ur ford mustangs, that was a stcok bmw 323i, aint no m3 niga
cherniybumer16 1 year ago
the m3 driver dt know how to drive
brayanLA 1 year ago
to prefer a mustang over an m3 u gotta be gay
brayanLA 1 year ago
@brayanLA to prefer a bmw over a mustang you gotta be straight......into a dudes ass.
ghoststang4point0 1 year ago
@ghoststang4point0 haha sounds like someone who cant afford a BMW
CGH1105 1 year ago
@CGH1105 i cant you are right, but if i could i would get a ford GT. if i was gunna be a rich asshole i would be a rich asshole in a ford gt, not in a generic bmw 3 series.
ghoststang4point0 1 year ago
with that mustang GT 4.6 with them 20 inch wheels was like wow not much wheel spin lol
JoNNyJ777 1 year ago
I'd rather drive a BMW then push a Ford. Go see how many people just in America alone have died in Ford's. My friend sold them and I asked him, "How the hell do you sell these pieces of shit?" He said, " if they're dumb enough to buy them, I'm smart enough to sell em and rip em off." He showed me how many people have died just in California and it made me sick. Go get your ZERO percent APR and see if that comes with a funeral insurance. FUCK FORD!! I'd drive a FIAT first.
tomgunc 1 year ago
@tomgunc You're just a fucking idiot. Stop talking like u know about cars u know shit, bc. u probably drive a piece of shit. Stop typing 3 pages of shit, nobody cares
Olsi89 1 year ago
@Olsi89 Dick nose, 3 pages of facts. Why don't you go buy a FORD and I'll buy life insurance on your sorry ass. You don't mind do you??
tomgunc 1 year ago
@tomgunc Go Suck a dick motherfucker and stop replying on everybodys comments nobody gives a fuck about your fucking opinion, Stop Replying to people u fucking faggot
Olsi89 1 year ago
@Olsi89 You mean like this fuck face, shit for brains?
tomgunc 1 year ago
@tomgunc More people have died in Fords because theres a ton more of them in the US compared to BMWs. I'll take an 03/04 Cobra over an overpriced sedan any day. Seriously, BMW owners think they are better than everyone else until they get smoked by a good old American made Terminator.
therock200198 1 year ago
@therock200198 yeah, and then good old german terminator comes and ford trash talkers gets shut on the street
cherniybumer16 1 year ago
@tomgunc Moron.. plain and simple
MonkeyMike1234 1 year ago
@MonkeyMike1234 Idiot who knows nothing about cars....that's plain and simple you Monkey.
tomgunc 1 year ago
shame on the BMW he fell asleep at the wheel i guess cause he got out fo his 2nd shift trying to pay off that expensive Beemer.
350gtrs 1 year ago
@350gtrs ummmn, no, this niga prapably got it for cash and still have some more left for 5 girls he got yesterday....
cherniybumer16 1 year ago
That wasn't even an m3 and a gt =/
L4z1n3ss 1 year ago
that is a gt nit a gt500
fucimports 1 year ago
that is not GT500 and its without supercharge and turbo
normal engine!!!
yaman5548718 1 year ago
That's not a GT500, it's a gayed-out GT.
DarkstarStatus27 1 year ago
Thats no Shelby.
SavageSS2010 1 year ago
hahaha go Ford
nvsal 1 year ago
yes, its a GT but probably supercharged
adriank9 1 year ago
that is not a Shelby GT 500 you dumb ass, not even a Shelby GT.. its just a GT.. stupid ass people thinking they know about cars.
mexwithapitt 1 year ago
Actually it's a Shelby GT, not the gt500. In 2007/2008 there was a limited production shelby gt. The shelby GT came stock with 319 hp. Basically a Mustang gt with a cold air kit and shelby hardware on the outside. Still a nice car though.
HarrisonForsyth 2 years ago
Looks like a Mustang GT to me. Sounds like one too there is no supercharger whine! Sure ain't no GT500 that's for sure. Oh well closer race this way but I don't know if the M3 needs a driver mod or something. M3's are nice and all but if that was a GT500 it wouldn't have been close at all in a straight line anyway!
MN12BIRD 2 years ago 25
@ MN12BIRD
Actually, both the E92 M3 and the GT500 run about a 12.6-12.7 in the 1/4 mile, with a slight edge to the Mustang, so they'd actually be neck and neck.
However, give them a turn and the Mustang's in trouble.
That M3 driver is awful for sure...14.9...lol...I could pull that in a Camry.
chrismd7 1 year ago
the 2010 shelby pulled an 11.951@120.29. a stock M3 would get pwned
608gamer07 1 year ago
@608gamer
First, this was shot in 2008, so we're not talking about the new 2010 GT500...lol
Second, most reported times for even the 2010 model shelby are in the low to mid 12 second range, not much faster than a stock M3.
But you obviously missed my point, which was that neither of those cars were well raced and should be much faster, although I agree it's a GT, not a Shelby.
chrismd7 1 year ago
this isnt a "reported" time though. i was actually accomplished by MM&FF magazine
608gamer07 1 year ago
@MN12BIRD wrong an e92 m3 does consistent 12.7 sec 1/4 mile. Gt500's do only a little better at 12.4 sec. Pretty sad considering an m3 is down about 100hp and tons of torque.
aieljose 1 year ago
@aieljose GT500's might only do 12.4 on the stock tires but everyone knows they can do WAY better on slicks. Stock GT500's with slicks have hit mid 11's so... yeah. Besides I also said the M3 needed a driver mod didn't I? This M3 ran slow and that wasn't a GT500. Everyone knows that's not a GT500. I don't know what it is but it's not a GT500. They were both slow.
MN12BIRD 1 year ago
@MN12BIRD yeah a gt500 might do mid 11's on slicks but don't you think an m3 could do similar times on slicks too? you cant compare a car with slicks vs one on stock rubber. Stock vs stock a gt500 wins by a little, not alot.
aieljose 1 year ago
@aieljose Yeah best I've seen a stock GT500 do with slicks was 11.3 and I'm sure a stock M3 could do high 11's on a good run with slicks. Faster sure but not a huge difference. I understand the M3 is lighter and I like the E93 M3's quite a lot. Hey in a corner we both know what car would win! I was mainly peeved at this video for claiming the Mustang to be a GT500 when it clearly has GT badges on the side and no GT500 graphics. It doesn't look like a GT500 one bit.
MN12BIRD 1 year ago
@MN12BIRD i agree.. that was a regular mustang
xmodrock 1 year ago
@akl3g I agree, what an a..hole.
L3andr3 2 years ago
Come on that bmw driver cant drive for shit his acceleration at start was crappy> Horrible driver for beautiful machine> But BMW will destroy mustang in curves on a real track BMW Power
TheESquared2 2 years ago
both cars need some new drivers, anyone look at the times?? 14.2 is slow for a GT and 14.9 for an alleged m3?!?!?! there is no way that was an m3
magikstik8457 2 years ago 2
well when an everday driver takes a car to the strip they will not run what the pros run in the mags. this could have also taken place in a higher altitude which will cause the times to be higher. driving a car on a strip is nothing like the street and very few people are able to run a good 1/4 mile their first time out.
608gamer07 2 years ago
@608gamer07 Still, 14.9 is unacceptable for an M3. Civic SI's run better times than that.
xtrasuxhyun 1 year ago
@xtrasuxhyun Well then imagine the Civic driver's first time down that strip!! Haha! It would be what 17s?
608gamer07 1 year ago
rofl the bmw driver doesn't know how to press on the gas or drive stick. look at his start, even a corolla is faster than that
TheChamp531 2 years ago
quit bring the old "put these cars on the track with lots of turns" saying. this is drag racing. u dont buy a mustang to handle. u buy a vette or a cts-v. quit complaining. mustang ate that m3
mazda6tuner99 2 years ago 2
@mazda6tuner99 Both cars ran unaccpetably horrible times, especially the M3.
xtrasuxhyun 1 year ago
ok....umm its just a mustang gt...not gt500
Cmillzz860 2 years ago
ok with the m3 BUT where are the m5 and the m6 haha the m6 beat ferrari and lambo loosers
svrle65 2 years ago
Comment removed
svrle65 2 years ago
bmw the best in slalom and all
jensswait 2 years ago
thats not even a gt500....but it still ate that BMW's ass for breakfast
VaNsfAnOhNiNe 2 years ago 3
yeah youre right its a GT with a KR body kit.
608gamer07 2 years ago
Sounds like the yavol crowd is whining and holy excuses. A loss is a loss. Bmw crowd says take it to the twisties to kick a Mustang Gt's bum but alas this race was on a drag strip. Once the whiners get a little older they will learn that to lose a race/game etc life does not end. Go Ford. Oh and before people reply with the
Ford junk read Consumers Report and they will differ with the junk opinion,
1964snakebite 2 years ago
sorry bud. Not a gt500
VRtek01GT 2 years ago
lol thats not even a gt 500 its just a gt mustang. and still beat that bmw. haha that guy can not drive. but go ford.
tudyr85 2 years ago 2
look at the video, it seems like the bmw slowed down for a second. try to fing more vids like this BMW is always winning. there is something fishy about this race. Shelby GT500 is a great car.
12040103 2 years ago
put one turn into the race and see what happens to that "american muscle"
jordangoodchap 2 years ago
that´s a GT V8 noobs
dimo1992 2 years ago
The m3 will kill it around the track
Mezbelig 2 years ago
lol. as if it couldn't in a drag race.
fastestlapsDOTcom 2 years ago
wow he embarrassed that M3 and its not even a GT500 !
WageDonky 2 years ago
yea not at all.... the gt500 gets 12.6 1/4 mile
xmodrock 2 years ago
what the gt500 is 12.6 1/4 mile holy smokes that lame the e92 m3 is 13 flat and check the specs plz check em wow mustang is garbage
speedinbimmer 2 years ago
the 2010 shelby pulls an 11.951@120.29
608gamer07 2 years ago
@xmodrock 12.6 is what the M3 is able to get, the gt500 gets it in the high 11s.
xtrasuxhyun 1 year ago
what a dumb cunt!!!! this is not a GT500 asswipe!!!!!!!!!
scorpiojudo 2 years ago
American Muscle BITCH!!!!
finalfront771 2 years ago
BMW>Shelby
NITROUSINJECTEDFISHY 2 years ago
jajaja gt500??? more like a GT with out the 500 jaja
cobrita500 2 years ago
Designed for high speed driving on tracks/roads courses that have BENDS. Finely tuned suspension, lightened bodies and balance to offer a rewarding driving experience. NOT for fucking drag racing shitbox muscle cars (small cock substitutes).
Why even bother? If you want to fuck a muscle car try a winding back road.
cupcakeflake 2 years ago
i love muscle cars
mainly for the growl
035577 2 years ago
This isn't a race. The m3 1/4 mile is not in the 14's, it is in the 12's. Either the driver is a retard, or he didn't race at all.
TheChamp531 2 years ago
Thats a GT not a GT500.
deanP382 2 years ago
yes i think so but rememberthe SHELBY is a muscle car and in drag races NO chhance for the BMW,but if they test drive in circuit the shelby sucks man..bmw is like snake when you drive it in a track..
BigRamis 2 years ago 7
@BigRamis 2011 mustang gt lapped even with a m3 in gingerman raceway thats a circle track
streetballn226 1 year ago
@BigRamis um the selby cobra mustang is a snake
kingDylant 1 year ago
bmw looks better and it can last a life time the Ford can maybe hold 5 years.
victorh1414 2 years ago
Does it matter. The BMW was toast.
sfcwoodret 2 years ago 2
This is a Mustang GT, not more!!!!
CPADT 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
M3 is way faster then Mustang GT500 it all depends on the driver.this vedio shows that the driver of M3 didnt know what he was doing.BMW AND Mersedec are the top car's and you guys should know that
namangan8181 2 years ago
that is not a GT500, u think u know obout cars check the video again, tha is a mustang GT with some mods. the shelby GT500, 500hp,mustang GT 300hp. look it up.
dog0182 2 years ago
I agree
victorh1414 2 years ago
Keep that pretentious Eurotrash off of the drag strip.
CrakBeWak 2 years ago
keep the muscle car trash off the corners.
blaziankhmer 2 years ago
It looked like they were drag racing to me.....
CrakBeWak 2 years ago 2
damn, that is one fast GT .......not GT500
pkidro 2 years ago
Just a Reguler GT.
ro67nj 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
m3 v8
mustang v10
bmw has the best v8 engines and better aero dinamics than mustang, mustang is a really weak car comparing to other v10 engines such as M6
johnnyzinho0 2 years ago
nope the mustang GT is a v8 4.6L not a v10 and the mustang gt500 is also a v8 5.4L
theguythatcould 2 years ago 3
Definitely not a GT500...
S1K07GTSTANG 2 years ago 3
thats not a gt500 first of all
doubledoubles4life 2 years ago 10
i raced an M3 in my 2007 V6 and BEAT him... yes beat him... idiot didnt know how 2 drive
lhhscifchamp 2 years ago
yeah but thatsa v6 not a v8 big diff.
brad3287 2 years ago
your talking out of your cunt
dryeraser123 2 years ago
either the driver had downs or youre lying
jordangoodchap 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I raced a new cobra in my 135i at a traffic light. I got 1/2 cars on him out of the box and kept it to about 65. We got to the second light and I got a whole car on him and kept it until the same. The GT500 would have beat me in the 1/4 mile as long as the road was straight. I could buy two 135i for what a super snake costs.
canaanav 2 years ago
lol you gimp... that isnt a GT500
thefatman1 2 years ago
why not?
mrattu 2 years ago
that stang whiped that m3 or 335ci if it was a stock 335i ya thats about right but m3 no way and you can ad the m3 pakage to the 335ci for 3k not the engin just the body kit
xXMisterManManXx 2 years ago
Comment removed
heathb44 2 years ago