what a lovely intelligent soul this is, I wish I could meet people like this. I agree with him whole heartedly, this world we live in with all it's answers, are no answers, their just stories to keep us happy and deluded. Thank you and keep this stuff coming.
PLEASE HELP ME!!! I once posted on TerenceMcKennaTube's youtube comments what happens when we die and he replied "You're still ignorant...so there may be hope for you, but that ain't my problem because you're blocked." Me taking another drug(whether it be weed of shrooms) will depend on the next answer you give me, is life just one scene in an never ending movie, or do I just keep on the same script, and relive it over and over again?
Thanks Graham, you have some of the best research and evidence of our ancient past in the world. I found another awesome work on this subject by Carl Munck called "The Code" this work is amazing and I suggest anyone that have time to check out the entire video, it's long and requires a little math background but very easily understood by most people. Golden knowledge here people check it out!
@Ettrick8 You have just made yourself look a bit naive by your comments.The bbc is a government establishment media pawn,anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence knows this.They have been caught on numerous occasions lying or twisting stories so the gullible public turn around & say "it must be right it was on the bbc".Just like what you have done.Before you comment back to me please research the matter, for example compare the bbc news to RT news giving news on the same story.
@davyro66 BBC is controlled by an independent board of trustees & I agree it is not perfect but you can complain as Hancock did. On his website Hancock states the Broadcasting Standards Commission found in his favour when they only partially agreed with 1 of the 8 complaints. The BBC revised their programme while Hancock’s website states Broadcasting watchdog vindicates unorthodox thinkers. It wasn’t a vindication but he appears to be selective in his evidence. Is this his usual approach?
@Ettrick8 about as selective as the bbc when airing a programme of what happened on 9/11,or waiting nearly a month before airing what was going on in Wall st.Also portraying Obama in a neutral view but not showing over 1 million people walking up to the white house because of all the lies his told.The corperation who highlights one jewish death in Gaza while Israel commits genocide on women & children & this gets hardly any news time.Also refusing to report on the Bilderberg meetings.
@davyro66 contd...The most powerful people in the world meeting to discuss policies in an un- democratic way that effect every single UK citizen.Should i even bother to mention the discrepancies in the Dr Kelly death they failed to report.What about the Hollie Grieg case that goes to the very top of government.Are these all examples of selective reporting or am i living in another world to the unbiased reporting of the BBC.
@davyro66 Your still whittering on about the BBC and missingthe point about Hancock selectively quoting eveidenace to suit himself . PS Dr Kelly committed suicide
@Ettrick8 I'm whittering on as you put it,i've just basically shot your opinion of the bbc to pieces.You are not going to be swayed no matter what i say,you've totally & utterley proved how asleep you are to the real world by saying Dr Kelly killed himself,just research the post mortem & the umteem experts who have signed a document to say this investigation is flawed on so many levels.You've dismissed every single thing i've said to you,so there obviously no point.You need to wake up!
@davyro66 You are deluded in having shot my opinion of the BBC to pieces i know its not perfect. I think that in your own way that you are as closed minded as the skeptics you object to. You also contradict yourself saying you shot my opinion to pieces and then state I've dismissed everything. Get your story straight
Now please answer the points I made about about Hancock only selecting evidence to prove his case.
PS experts have also confirmed the poor DR Kelly committed suicide
@Ettrick8 How did i contradict myself,i have shown you how the bbc are selective in what they do.It's your opinion otherwise,in my view i've named actual things that are a FACT.Your opinions don't give any answers that prove me wrong except a statement by yourself about Dr Kelly.Also you have obviously dismissed what i've said because if you'd researched anything i said or taken any notice of it you might just start to think for yourself & quote establishment views all of the time.
@davyro66 cont...The BBC & it's independant board of trustee's,who are they & how independant are they.Are these nameless people historians,have they dived off the coast of Japan,Malta & the mediteranian & probably one of the biggest area's of interest the North West coast of India.Have you seen any film of these areas.Has the BBC shown any film of these areas?Are you member of this faceless independant board.Do you defend them by accusing people of pratteling or withering on.Wake up!
@davyro66 cont...You know nothing about the subjects i mentioned,you've never heard of the Bilder berg group,that's why you haven't got an opinion of them.You sir are a clown.You know nothing about history either,if you do tell me about the Sumerian's probably the most important civilization in our history.All you can do is try & wind people up with there opinions because you have none.all you can do is quote the bbc.Now go & watch some Kate Bush hahahaha
@davyro66 You accuse the BBC of hiding facts while ironically accepting that it is OK for Graham Hancock to be selective in the facts he uses to support his case. Your so-called arguments are merely ranting and length diatribes.
I have heard of Bilderberg Group (note its 1 word), been to Malta ands read of noumerous conspiracy theories. Re Dr Kelly, 2 forensic pathologists, Chris Milroy & Guy Rutty support the suicide theory.
I’m off to listen to the orginal & talented Kate Bush now
@davyro66 Don't deviate and prattle on about the BBC instead answer my poimts about an independant body rejecting Hancock's who then selectively quoting these findings on his web site
Don't follow anything not even science. Just because we survive on the cushy technologies science has produced does not give it legitimacy. Think for yourself and challenge EVERYTHING even the information in this video.
ok, now I love Graham. I'm perhaps his biggest fan. But this video gives several examples of his unfortunate tendancy toward dramatic embellishment. The Mayan Calander says NOTHING about a movement of the crust of the earth. In fact, it says nothing about anything, except that it's calander cycle ends on a precise date. That's it. Frightening enough. But still.
@nairbasirrah The Mayan calendar also begins on a specific date ... August 11 3114 BCE but, we all know human life existed before that. So, there's nothing to be frightened about. It'll be another Y2K, I'm sure.
@phihaley You need intimate familiarity with the ideas and observations of scientists, archaeologists, astronomers, theoretical biologists and physicists and the like to contextualize the formations in your own mind. Otherwise you leave all the work to those who listen to you to figure out whether you are operating within your own little vernacular of terminology or just crazy.
@nerdyharry Aye up weve upset the women again!, you DWEEB!!!! Vernacular do me a favour you dont have the slightest what it means you condecending muppet...
Well my mind just melted lol But i figured it out... between 25,000-15,000 years ago there were highly advanced humans that were perhaps far more advanced than us or maybe not. But they were almost completely wiped out when the Earth's entire crust shifted causing destruction on a global scale. The survivors built the pyramids and the other massive structures Graham mentioned to withstand this event that is scheduled to happen again on Dec 21, 2012. idk call me stupid or crazy, just my theory
An obvious fraud with the usual proposal that the experts in the field (in this case historians and archeologists) are hiding the truth whilst he flatters anyone who listens to him the he is the genuine article. He knows something that the 'authorities' don't want people to know. Laughable.
@09mldaniel Is Graham Hancock an archeologist? Has his work ever been peer reviewed? Have his findings ever been verified and published in any recognized scientific or archeological publication? If not, then I can confidently say that his work has no credibility whatsoever and he is just making money out of suckers. His own introduction gave the game away as he immediately began by insinuating that the 'experts' are basically all frauds and, of course, he is not. That's it really.
@ritchloui No he began by acknowledging that science is skewed when it has human attachments to the outcome. If this is insinuating the "experts" are faulted , then you are right.
@09mldaniel There are many things that are made insignificant to the point of invisibility. For example, the early civilisations in Africa or even Arabia - have all been deliberately hidden. This is where one should be looking if you want to really make a difference. The trouble is, you will almost certainly be prevented, every step of the way, if not killed. This is not the scientists who are involved in a cover up but the religious dogmatists who will kill anyone, instantly.
@09mldaniel If you are interested in genuinely hidden histories, why not look to Afghanistan. A once prosperous and wealth Buddhist country at the centre of a major world trade route. Why do you think the Arab slavers went to such lengths to conquer it and divest it of all its wealth? They didn't go there because it was a desolate, destitute backwater. It has been governed by Islamist warlords ever since. They still keep destroying the evidence of its once GREAT past.
@ritchloui I agree with you! There are too many who are Too attached to being right. It is unfortunate, in the end though truth withstands time. Peace to you Lou.
@ritchloui You don't have to be an Archaeologist to discern that the monolithic architecture that covers all parts of the globe require tools , chemistry and technique that go far beyond that which is obtainable by us at this stage of our technical evolution.. And how do you explain the precise alignments to global poles . How do you explain the extraordinary degree of Astronomical proficiency ..The cutting and movement of 1400 ton monoliths. Snap out of it !!~!! Many minds open new direction
This school of new thinking is not brought forth by just Hancock . For about 100 years the old guard has been coming increasinly under critique. As free thinking graduate thinkers apply the knowledge provided by 20th century discoveries they connect the dots that are challenging the stagnant and self protecting arguments of the old school. Zecharia Sitchin , Bauval , Schock , Wood and hundreds more present credible and progressive works that are putting the old school to rest.Sorry!
Not really although I am sure that both have vested interests to protect but more so the people in the Archaeology and Anthropology. The people who wrote the old School books fight against anyone coming in to overturn their thesis .. It's just the way it is.. But as we move into the future we have bigger telescopes , bigger microscopes , have bigger shovels and improve our ability to connect the dots.... Cheers!!~!!
@winterhawk1618 Yes indeed, bigger telescopes, microscopes and shovels. I like that. Interestingly, the difference between religious or mystical doctrines and dogmas, scientists GAIN brownie points when they successfully overturn existing theses. In fact they become stars and are long remembered for whatever 'revolution' or discovery they make. That's half the fun of science and the secret ambition of every one of them.
even if he's right about this ancient civilization - ie Atlantis - he's still flogging a dead horse - because it was destroyed so many years ago there will be nothing left of it but a few crumbling pyramids and some antedeluvian myths. The traces of Roman Britain have almost disappeared and that existed only 1700 years ago - so what chance have we of understanding a long lost Island continent
This guy's intellect is so obviously superior to that Ancient Aliens guy, why wouldn't they get this guy instead of that kook. Why? cause then people couldn't dismiss it as the ramblings of an idiot. Just sayin.
I've heard this video for the 6 time and every time I did it my mind blew, thousands of thoughts, questioning. "We've forgotten something of very importance…" Hancock, I think we forgot who we really are. How can people live with themselves without knowing from where we came from? How? How is that possible?
@exmiles Kudo's to you my friend.. I have read some of his books and tested his assertions myself . I think that anybody that condemns forward and reasonable thinking are probably afraid of the dark .
I think even more articulate as a speaker than he is as an author... one day Graham you will be look back apon as a man who tried to open the worlds eyes to the "amnesia" of our own race, as you have so eloquently put it.
I'm inclined to believe, since I do not under-stand, in the cycle of consciousness theory. I don't think they built these monuments for us to see, because they knew people today wouldn't be receptive. This brings us to the consciousness cycle aspect of the problem. In a downgraded state of perception, caused by whatever invisible force, we wouldn't be receptive; you cannot see what you do not pay close attention to.
we do have evidence about those times. we call them "myths" and "legends" and we dismiss them as metaphorical interpretations of a primitive culture, gibberish about natural phenomenons or simply just belletristic nonsence.
I think Tiahuanaco was a monument to those who died by the great flood, the unique faces seem to represent the different races of the planet. The figure at the top of the gateway, possibly Viracocha AKA Quetzalcoatl looks to have a tear running from his eye. The numerous sites of incredible structures in central and south America makes me think that this was the continent of Atlantis..see Jim Allens, "Atlantis in the Andes",
I cannot disagree with that thought but I would even take it one step further . I think that there was an Upheaval around 12500 years ago. But I believe that the world wad populated to a considerable degree. Atlantis was just one center of seafarers who had a very advanced technology built on something similar to Tesla's Tech . This may have provided for the type of ability that would have facilitated the levitation of monoliths and other flying craft...
i agree, but we are all missing that true love in us.. which is oneness of all, without government, currency, hierarchies, make believe royalties. We as humans could progress to oneness, though we individuals are all separated in different countries for us to hate eachother by ""race", which is the reason why some see other "race" as "aliens". these useless stage wars that have been going on for ever is what is destroying us humanity spiritutally.
this guy is walking in public areas .. he is crazyyyyyyy ... if the mayans were sooo smart why couldnt they leave a messege on dvd for us .. they did predict the end of the world .. i know for sure they would of saw a dvd player somewhere in the distant future .....
Excellent film; Graham Hancock is superb telling us in clear language what we need to be aware of. I've watched him for years - this short film (which is edited very well) beautifully culminates much of his good work. Thank you.
~“Feeling”~ ~“led”~ almost ~“compelled”~ to ~“write”~ my(free)~“book”~ ~”DIVINE 9/11 INTERVENTON”~@ LOVEGODISLOVEdotORG ~“thusly”~ I ~“discovered”~ a ~“77”~ ~“alignment”~ of ~“seven...”~'s ~“hidden”~ in the book of ~“Revelation”~! Do you think ~“this”~ ~“physical evidence”~ of ~“Spiritual Intelligence”~(i.e.~“God”~)might cause more of ~“us”~ to sit up and take notice of what it ~“truly”~ means to ~“Love thy neighbour as thyself.”~! ~“Coincidence is God's way of remaining anonymous.”~ A.Einstein
Just how open-minded are you? A document that was mailed unsolicited to Lawrence Spencer in 2007 will test that, and fascinate the truth-seeker...google 'alien interview' and see.
What I found really strange is how he says that scientific evidence is now being piled up to prove these theories yet he then says that science doesn't satisfy because it tries to reduce things to molecules. This is wrong, science doesn't try and do that. Science is a just a method of observing, testing, and understanding of our surroundings. It also has no shame in admitting when it is wrong and redefining itself. If human species is older then archeologists claim then that is still science.
@LambdaQuarks Modern mainstream science is incredibly watered down and tampered with. Let's not ignore the fact that there is over a century worth of top secret research that has gone on and has still not been revealed to the public. In fact, there is probably way more than that, maybe you never heard of the inquisition and the burning of the Library of Alexandria. Not all of the information discovered was destroyed, but there are plenty of secrets we will never know because it's hidden
There maybe hidden technologies and researches. I don't doubt the research but I can't contemplate much something I know nothing about or am ignorant of. Basically, until proven otherwise it might as well be a conspiracy theory.
@LambdaQuarks Hancock isn't really doing that either, his theories are based on imperical evidence, and to be honest, it's harder to believe that these findings are merely coincidence than to believe that civilization dates to a much earlier date than widely accepted. Let's put it this way, without contemplation of the unknown, humans would still be hunter gatherers with no means of moving forward... get my drift?
@DimensionalVibration I wouldn't dis-agree with that. I would say that claiming that the structures are older is a viable theory. I combat and refuse to accept the ancient aliens theories only, they have no credible support for it all. It is far more likely that the ancient people were simply better stone builders then us as that is what they worked with their entire lives and devoted thousands of laborers to tasks. I just didn't like is rant against science when he uses it himself as you say.
I do think some of these sites are older then what archeologists claim and this man has a point however then come in the stupid idiots yelling aliens did it and ruin science all together.
@LambdaQuarks Well, as farfetched as it may sound, it's not completely out of the realm of possibility. I'm not saying it's true, but like you said earlier, none of us were there to witness what actually happened, and so we have to go by what we do know. I've specifically heard Hancock say that these supposed "Gods" are entities that exist outside of physicality and who materialize in the form of DMT experiences and Shamanic visions. Knowing what we know about DMT, that's more believable...
@DimensionalVibration Still... science is so full of mysterious discoveries (even mainstream science) that I can't completely rule out any possibilities. I think the important thing is to have an open mind and a positive outlook, and take in everything you can, whether or not you believe it to be true. Knowledge is what allows us to grow and evolve. Without all the true and false out there, we wouldn't know what to shoot for in this fleeting life we share as the human race.
There is no credible support at all to even begin to suggest alien intervention. Might as well say midgets from the center of the earth did it because humans needed help and we don't know how they did it. There has to be a reason why science would even debate a theory or claim it a possibility. The age of structures could be different then what we thought all the time, but aliens flying around to help civilizations build giant buildings out of rock? How likely is that?
@LambdaQuarks I don't know how many "credible" sources there actually are out there, but I honestly don't think the people who claim to be credible sources are too credible either. That's why I said that it doesn't hurt to look at all possibilities, regardless of the conclusions you come up with yourself. In fact, the sources who believe the ancient aliens theories are more credible imo than the ones who disregard it as "science fiction" because those people have lied too many times.
@LambdaQuarks I am kind of stumped on what you consider "credible support" and what scientist that go against the teachings of mainstream science. There is proof that ancient civilization had a technology that we, with our modern tools, would even today have difficulty duplicating. There is no denying that if these structures are not built by cavemen. They had an understanding of life and purpose, and because they died a many of years ago makes them less credible? Do you believe in aliens?
I was speaking of the credibility of the alien theory. Not that ancient man may have been wiser or more advanced than originally thought. Why are you asking me if I believe in Aliens? I think that is a silly question. I know that there is a chance that life may have evolved somewhere else but I have no clue as to the probability of such a second event as here on earth and the probability of them being intelligent.
Progress is controlled. Intelligence is controlled. Otherwise, the controllers would not be able to control. I hope you all can understand why someone like me would not tell you the truth as it would defy my livelihood and my families lives. We need to stay ahead of the underlings whom do not know the truths, otherwise we would have no control over them. We limit intelligence in children we do not want to ascend to our selves. There is more.
I agree with him that this civilization it has a common source,but it was created before the great deluge and not after!,..THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO!....BY THE CYCLOPS!....
Look at the Lion Gate at Mycenae,..WHICH IS NOT ONLY 4000 YEARS OLD AS THEY SAY,...BUT MORE THAN 12000 YEARS OLD!!!!...NO MORE LIES!..WE WANT THE TRUTH!!!!
Does the name Incari=Ίκαροs say something to you ..my dear Graham Hancock?.Do you know anything about Ñaupamachus =Ναυπαυμάχους..Do you know anything about the bearded Dion-an= Ντίον-Αν and Ηρακάν= Heracles?.. .The people of the place know!!!PAY ATTENTION TO THEIR STORY!!!!
As a child I INSTANTLY rejected the "usual American religion" which I considered to be just as silly and illogical as believing in the tooth fairy... I couldnt of believed in it even if I wanted too... I also sensed the grossly incomplete explanation given by main stream science on this issue which ironically contradicts itself in the end... But this theory fits PERFECTLY in the grand puzzle "at least in my perception" Anyone involved in researching this field KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK!
I don't think we understand just how staggering it is that an ancient South American culture, with limited sophistication, produced a complete calender and time system before anyone in the New World
When you really consider this lone fact, knowledge from very ancient and advanced unknown culture is the only realistic answer.
Hancock is the Copernicus and Socrats of of modern day. When I read "fringerprints" a few years ago I was so astounded to finally feel that I was not alone in my thinking...
Big Fan!! Read his book "Finger Prints of the Gods" and he is the real deal as a researcher for the truth in science, origins, mythology and archaeology. I will read all his books eventually.. : )
He presents his findings and his long-though theories with absolute clarity.
I have looked at both sides of the model, and Graham is right...the mainstream model is lacking and, in a lot of cases, ignorant of very important evidence.
I find it an insult to the intelligence of my fellow man and myself that we are expected to swallow so many phenomenal things on this planet as "coincidence."
I mean come on people....you cannot be that naive.
@RealityQuestioned This probably is the first video I have seen of Graham and I would not consider this explanation is clear ! May be there are things in today's state of knowledge based on this piece I would not consider anything that he is proposing to be true. He leaves a lot of question unanswered and with his eloquence undermines proofs that are needed for such a massive assertion....Not satisfied!
I find his assertions that scientists would not accept new ideas preposterous. That is the precise definition of being a scientist. I have read about a lot of Scientist/biologist/ who have accepted thier mistakes and models when there is evidence to the contrary. The idea that ALL the scientist ignore evidence just for the sake of their livelihood is WRONG.Dead WRONG.
Agreed, brother. From what I can tell, the only way is for there to be a collective uprising (what are the odds with such a divided, apathetic public?) or if people go back to the entheogens. Truly, I think the latter is integral if this current enigma of self deceit is ever to unravel. One can only hope! Cheers!
Anyone who describes what science is uncovering about the mysteries of life as "dry and sterile" hasn't been reading up on science, let alone looking at pictures from the Hubble or checking out the awesome finds of the Kepler or Cassini missions. Those who want to reject science for a greater mystery are usually just too damn lazy to read or think with a combination of open mind and discipline. Hancock, get off the (u) tube !
You are incorrect, sir. The point Hancock is making is that science has failed us in the way of becoming institutionalized. Sure, advances in technology are fantastic; the Hubble telescope is one of the more important scientific instruments created by mankind. But, in terms of what's happening here on earth, historically speaking, its current paradigm is severely lacking, and in its dogmatism rejecting a mountain of evidence, thereby circumventing the scientific method itself.
Anyone who describes what science is uncovering about the mysteries of life as "dry and sterile" hasn't been reading up on science, let alone looking at pictures from the Hubble or checking out the awesome finds of the Kepler or Cassini missions. Those who want to reject science for a greater mystery are usually just too damn lazy to read or think with a combination of open mind and discipline. Hancock, get off the (u) tube !
Graham is so convincing. If only hed let me research with him id decipher and activate all the devices left by the ancients and run away with the secret and no one will ever know that it happened.
Comments like these are exactly why we are doomed as a civilization. "I like the word titi caca, I can't watch your videos because of large 'inserts", "My Ipod's loading time is too long", "Would you like fries with that?" etc. Our spiritual halves are so hollow that the balance that's supposed to make up a true human being is missing. The spiritual (and economic) bills are coming due real soon. I hope you are ready.
Yes, this reminds me that I have been fascinated with Egypt since I was very young, so young I don't remember how I first heard of it. But a dream I had when I was really young and impressed me to remember it well was when I went into a huge hall and there were thing like coffins standing in rows, but they had glass doors..and one I walked up to looked like a king with his eyes closed...and I was startled to think he was my father! Not the one I actually had! I still wonder why....
NOT SURE THIS BLOKE IS HUMAN
gjpope23 1 day ago
Exactly what the Mormons believe.
crightthruu 1 month ago
Fingerprints of the gods is a very good and interesting read.
ghsty9 2 months ago
what a lovely intelligent soul this is, I wish I could meet people like this. I agree with him whole heartedly, this world we live in with all it's answers, are no answers, their just stories to keep us happy and deluded. Thank you and keep this stuff coming.
LouiseKahj 2 months ago 5
@LouiseKahj Well Said! Really Well Said!!
onewhonever 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE HELP ME!!! I once posted on TerenceMcKennaTube's youtube comments what happens when we die and he replied "You're still ignorant...so there may be hope for you, but that ain't my problem because you're blocked." Me taking another drug(whether it be weed of shrooms) will depend on the next answer you give me, is life just one scene in an never ending movie, or do I just keep on the same script, and relive it over and over again?
nickthegrizzly2 2 months ago
Thanks Graham, you have some of the best research and evidence of our ancient past in the world. I found another awesome work on this subject by Carl Munck called "The Code" this work is amazing and I suggest anyone that have time to check out the entire video, it's long and requires a little math background but very easily understood by most people. Golden knowledge here people check it out!
treflippunk 2 months ago
Sounds like selective pseudo science to me. His theories were torn to shreds bythe BBC years ago
Ettrick8 2 months ago
@Ettrick8 You have just made yourself look a bit naive by your comments.The bbc is a government establishment media pawn,anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence knows this.They have been caught on numerous occasions lying or twisting stories so the gullible public turn around & say "it must be right it was on the bbc".Just like what you have done.Before you comment back to me please research the matter, for example compare the bbc news to RT news giving news on the same story.
davyro66 2 months ago
@davyro66 BBC is controlled by an independent board of trustees & I agree it is not perfect but you can complain as Hancock did. On his website Hancock states the Broadcasting Standards Commission found in his favour when they only partially agreed with 1 of the 8 complaints. The BBC revised their programme while Hancock’s website states Broadcasting watchdog vindicates unorthodox thinkers. It wasn’t a vindication but he appears to be selective in his evidence. Is this his usual approach?
Ettrick8 2 months ago
@Ettrick8 about as selective as the bbc when airing a programme of what happened on 9/11,or waiting nearly a month before airing what was going on in Wall st.Also portraying Obama in a neutral view but not showing over 1 million people walking up to the white house because of all the lies his told.The corperation who highlights one jewish death in Gaza while Israel commits genocide on women & children & this gets hardly any news time.Also refusing to report on the Bilderberg meetings.
davyro66 2 months ago
@davyro66 contd...The most powerful people in the world meeting to discuss policies in an un- democratic way that effect every single UK citizen.Should i even bother to mention the discrepancies in the Dr Kelly death they failed to report.What about the Hollie Grieg case that goes to the very top of government.Are these all examples of selective reporting or am i living in another world to the unbiased reporting of the BBC.
davyro66 2 months ago
@davyro66 Your still whittering on about the BBC and missingthe point about Hancock selectively quoting eveidenace to suit himself . PS Dr Kelly committed suicide
Ettrick8 2 months ago
@Ettrick8 I'm whittering on as you put it,i've just basically shot your opinion of the bbc to pieces.You are not going to be swayed no matter what i say,you've totally & utterley proved how asleep you are to the real world by saying Dr Kelly killed himself,just research the post mortem & the umteem experts who have signed a document to say this investigation is flawed on so many levels.You've dismissed every single thing i've said to you,so there obviously no point.You need to wake up!
davyro66 2 months ago
@davyro66 You are deluded in having shot my opinion of the BBC to pieces i know its not perfect. I think that in your own way that you are as closed minded as the skeptics you object to. You also contradict yourself saying you shot my opinion to pieces and then state I've dismissed everything. Get your story straight
Now please answer the points I made about about Hancock only selecting evidence to prove his case.
PS experts have also confirmed the poor DR Kelly committed suicide
Ettrick8 2 months ago
@Ettrick8 How did i contradict myself,i have shown you how the bbc are selective in what they do.It's your opinion otherwise,in my view i've named actual things that are a FACT.Your opinions don't give any answers that prove me wrong except a statement by yourself about Dr Kelly.Also you have obviously dismissed what i've said because if you'd researched anything i said or taken any notice of it you might just start to think for yourself & quote establishment views all of the time.
davyro66 2 months ago
@davyro66 cont...The BBC & it's independant board of trustee's,who are they & how independant are they.Are these nameless people historians,have they dived off the coast of Japan,Malta & the mediteranian & probably one of the biggest area's of interest the North West coast of India.Have you seen any film of these areas.Has the BBC shown any film of these areas?Are you member of this faceless independant board.Do you defend them by accusing people of pratteling or withering on.Wake up!
davyro66 2 months ago
@davyro66 cont...You know nothing about the subjects i mentioned,you've never heard of the Bilder berg group,that's why you haven't got an opinion of them.You sir are a clown.You know nothing about history either,if you do tell me about the Sumerian's probably the most important civilization in our history.All you can do is try & wind people up with there opinions because you have none.all you can do is quote the bbc.Now go & watch some Kate Bush hahahaha
davyro66 2 months ago
@davyro66 You accuse the BBC of hiding facts while ironically accepting that it is OK for Graham Hancock to be selective in the facts he uses to support his case. Your so-called arguments are merely ranting and length diatribes.
I have heard of Bilderberg Group (note its 1 word), been to Malta ands read of noumerous conspiracy theories. Re Dr Kelly, 2 forensic pathologists, Chris Milroy & Guy Rutty support the suicide theory.
I’m off to listen to the orginal & talented Kate Bush now
Ettrick8 2 months ago
@Ettrick8 Good for you. Peace.
123daleyb 2 months ago
@davyro66 Don't deviate and prattle on about the BBC instead answer my poimts about an independant body rejecting Hancock's who then selectively quoting these findings on his web site
Ettrick8 2 months ago
this man just blew my mind, and is a fukin genius
firered84 2 months ago
You will find that the greatest conspiracy is Christ is back.. his name is Brian Leonard Golighjtly Marshall
NibiruClose 2 months ago
lame
clickswitchh 2 months ago
Don't follow anything not even science. Just because we survive on the cushy technologies science has produced does not give it legitimacy. Think for yourself and challenge EVERYTHING even the information in this video.
Josephjoel3 3 months ago
ok, now I love Graham. I'm perhaps his biggest fan. But this video gives several examples of his unfortunate tendancy toward dramatic embellishment. The Mayan Calander says NOTHING about a movement of the crust of the earth. In fact, it says nothing about anything, except that it's calander cycle ends on a precise date. That's it. Frightening enough. But still.
nairbasirrah 3 months ago
@nairbasirrah The Mayan calendar also begins on a specific date ... August 11 3114 BCE but, we all know human life existed before that. So, there's nothing to be frightened about. It'll be another Y2K, I'm sure.
3gollum3 3 months ago
@3gollum3 the mayan calender wasnt meant to mean the beginning of the human race you fool lol.
metallica1577 2 months ago
Belive your own mind,you dont need scientists,archeologists ETC to feed you what to believe!
phihaley 3 months ago
@phihaley You need intimate familiarity with the ideas and observations of scientists, archaeologists, astronomers, theoretical biologists and physicists and the like to contextualize the formations in your own mind. Otherwise you leave all the work to those who listen to you to figure out whether you are operating within your own little vernacular of terminology or just crazy.
nerdyharry 3 months ago
@nerdyharry Aye up weve upset the women again!, you DWEEB!!!! Vernacular do me a favour you dont have the slightest what it means you condecending muppet...
phihaley 3 months ago
great
for the whole human race to have a clear open mind for anything to be possible..... ..may be the key to human evolution
justvers 3 months ago
Well my mind just melted lol But i figured it out... between 25,000-15,000 years ago there were highly advanced humans that were perhaps far more advanced than us or maybe not. But they were almost completely wiped out when the Earth's entire crust shifted causing destruction on a global scale. The survivors built the pyramids and the other massive structures Graham mentioned to withstand this event that is scheduled to happen again on Dec 21, 2012. idk call me stupid or crazy, just my theory
arcticfreak7 4 months ago
An obvious fraud with the usual proposal that the experts in the field (in this case historians and archeologists) are hiding the truth whilst he flatters anyone who listens to him the he is the genuine article. He knows something that the 'authorities' don't want people to know. Laughable.
ritchloui 4 months ago
@ritchloui If he is a fraud , then give evidence to that statement. It might take you a very long time , seeing as you appear to have nothing.
09mldaniel 4 months ago
@09mldaniel Is Graham Hancock an archeologist? Has his work ever been peer reviewed? Have his findings ever been verified and published in any recognized scientific or archeological publication? If not, then I can confidently say that his work has no credibility whatsoever and he is just making money out of suckers. His own introduction gave the game away as he immediately began by insinuating that the 'experts' are basically all frauds and, of course, he is not. That's it really.
ritchloui 4 months ago
@ritchloui No he began by acknowledging that science is skewed when it has human attachments to the outcome. If this is insinuating the "experts" are faulted , then you are right.
09mldaniel 4 months ago
@09mldaniel There are many things that are made insignificant to the point of invisibility. For example, the early civilisations in Africa or even Arabia - have all been deliberately hidden. This is where one should be looking if you want to really make a difference. The trouble is, you will almost certainly be prevented, every step of the way, if not killed. This is not the scientists who are involved in a cover up but the religious dogmatists who will kill anyone, instantly.
ritchloui 4 months ago
@09mldaniel If you are interested in genuinely hidden histories, why not look to Afghanistan. A once prosperous and wealth Buddhist country at the centre of a major world trade route. Why do you think the Arab slavers went to such lengths to conquer it and divest it of all its wealth? They didn't go there because it was a desolate, destitute backwater. It has been governed by Islamist warlords ever since. They still keep destroying the evidence of its once GREAT past.
ritchloui 4 months ago
@ritchloui I agree with you! There are too many who are Too attached to being right. It is unfortunate, in the end though truth withstands time. Peace to you Lou.
09mldaniel 4 months ago
@ritchloui You don't have to be an Archaeologist to discern that the monolithic architecture that covers all parts of the globe require tools , chemistry and technique that go far beyond that which is obtainable by us at this stage of our technical evolution.. And how do you explain the precise alignments to global poles . How do you explain the extraordinary degree of Astronomical proficiency ..The cutting and movement of 1400 ton monoliths. Snap out of it !!~!! Many minds open new direction
winterhawk1618 3 months ago
This school of new thinking is not brought forth by just Hancock . For about 100 years the old guard has been coming increasinly under critique. As free thinking graduate thinkers apply the knowledge provided by 20th century discoveries they connect the dots that are challenging the stagnant and self protecting arguments of the old school. Zecharia Sitchin , Bauval , Schock , Wood and hundreds more present credible and progressive works that are putting the old school to rest.Sorry!
winterhawk1618 3 months ago
@winterhawk1618 Ah. I assume you mean by the 'old guard' the Roman Church and its fascist sister Islam.
ritchloui 3 months ago
@ritchloui
Not really although I am sure that both have vested interests to protect but more so the people in the Archaeology and Anthropology. The people who wrote the old School books fight against anyone coming in to overturn their thesis .. It's just the way it is.. But as we move into the future we have bigger telescopes , bigger microscopes , have bigger shovels and improve our ability to connect the dots.... Cheers!!~!!
winterhawk1618 3 months ago
@winterhawk1618 Yes indeed, bigger telescopes, microscopes and shovels. I like that. Interestingly, the difference between religious or mystical doctrines and dogmas, scientists GAIN brownie points when they successfully overturn existing theses. In fact they become stars and are long remembered for whatever 'revolution' or discovery they make. That's half the fun of science and the secret ambition of every one of them.
ritchloui 3 months ago
even if he's right about this ancient civilization - ie Atlantis - he's still flogging a dead horse - because it was destroyed so many years ago there will be nothing left of it but a few crumbling pyramids and some antedeluvian myths. The traces of Roman Britain have almost disappeared and that existed only 1700 years ago - so what chance have we of understanding a long lost Island continent
32peartree 4 months ago
there cro magnon omg how dumb are people
rhodawg666 4 months ago
cro magnons built things differently to us
rhodawg666 4 months ago
retarded
rhodawg666 4 months ago
This guy's intellect is so obviously superior to that Ancient Aliens guy, why wouldn't they get this guy instead of that kook. Why? cause then people couldn't dismiss it as the ramblings of an idiot. Just sayin.
HellspawnICX 4 months ago
I found out about this man not to long ago listening to the Joe Rogan Experiance.
I look forward to learning more about his research.
doggydeeds 5 months ago 4
i wonder who made this?
jahwob 5 months ago
I've heard this video for the 6 time and every time I did it my mind blew, thousands of thoughts, questioning. "We've forgotten something of very importance…" Hancock, I think we forgot who we really are. How can people live with themselves without knowing from where we came from? How? How is that possible?
exmiles 5 months ago
@exmiles Kudo's to you my friend.. I have read some of his books and tested his assertions myself . I think that anybody that condemns forward and reasonable thinking are probably afraid of the dark .
winterhawk1618 3 months ago
I think even more articulate as a speaker than he is as an author... one day Graham you will be look back apon as a man who tried to open the worlds eyes to the "amnesia" of our own race, as you have so eloquently put it.
Much respect, long may you continue.
ozziedogg1976 5 months ago
graham hancock might be old and smart but hes hot also.
canadiankewldude 5 months ago
I'm inclined to believe, since I do not under-stand, in the cycle of consciousness theory. I don't think they built these monuments for us to see, because they knew people today wouldn't be receptive. This brings us to the consciousness cycle aspect of the problem. In a downgraded state of perception, caused by whatever invisible force, we wouldn't be receptive; you cannot see what you do not pay close attention to.
exmiles 5 months ago
Comment removed
exmiles 5 months ago
we do have evidence about those times. we call them "myths" and "legends" and we dismiss them as metaphorical interpretations of a primitive culture, gibberish about natural phenomenons or simply just belletristic nonsence.
mormoloq 5 months ago
I think Tiahuanaco was a monument to those who died by the great flood, the unique faces seem to represent the different races of the planet. The figure at the top of the gateway, possibly Viracocha AKA Quetzalcoatl looks to have a tear running from his eye. The numerous sites of incredible structures in central and south America makes me think that this was the continent of Atlantis..see Jim Allens, "Atlantis in the Andes",
fjdoreza69 6 months ago
@fjdoreza69
I cannot disagree with that thought but I would even take it one step further . I think that there was an Upheaval around 12500 years ago. But I believe that the world wad populated to a considerable degree. Atlantis was just one center of seafarers who had a very advanced technology built on something similar to Tesla's Tech . This may have provided for the type of ability that would have facilitated the levitation of monoliths and other flying craft...
winterhawk1618 3 months ago
we are the aliens that we are seeking
pozzimystic 6 months ago
Comment removed
Rcee01 5 months ago
@pozzimystic
i agree, but we are all missing that true love in us.. which is oneness of all, without government, currency, hierarchies, make believe royalties. We as humans could progress to oneness, though we individuals are all separated in different countries for us to hate eachother by ""race", which is the reason why some see other "race" as "aliens". these useless stage wars that have been going on for ever is what is destroying us humanity spiritutally.
Rcee01 5 months ago
@Rcee01 The truth wins, always in the end at least, we are one with it all!
pozzimystic 5 months ago
@Rcee01 race as well as cultural bariers
rhombusskullvsteal 5 months ago
5:28 The Geologists and the Archaeologists don't Compare notes... haha lol thats the best explanation. Its so simple to understand
TheMadisonHang 6 months ago
what really puts it over the top is his... unibomber glasses
beatboxingkoz 7 months ago
this guy is walking in public areas .. he is crazyyyyyyy ... if the mayans were sooo smart why couldnt they leave a messege on dvd for us .. they did predict the end of the world .. i know for sure they would of saw a dvd player somewhere in the distant future .....
beatboxingkoz 7 months ago
@beatboxingkoz you are a very stupid person. good day.
SJGibbons1000 5 months ago
@beatboxingkoz
Is that the best you could do ?
winterhawk1618 3 months ago
Excellent film; Graham Hancock is superb telling us in clear language what we need to be aware of. I've watched him for years - this short film (which is edited very well) beautifully culminates much of his good work. Thank you.
4EMF 8 months ago
THE DOGON GOES BACK 100,000 YEARS AGO OR MORE!!!!
sonicsoundwaveus 8 months ago
I 100% just farted.
estimaze 8 months ago in playlist Advanced Ancient Civilizations
he looks like an aged heath ledger
darkness8798 8 months ago
Graham Hancock=Genius
FeelGood30 8 months ago
~“Feeling”~ ~“led”~ almost ~“compelled”~ to ~“write”~ my(free)~“book”~ ~”DIVINE 9/11 INTERVENTON”~@ LOVEGODISLOVEdotORG ~“thusly”~ I ~“discovered”~ a ~“77”~ ~“alignment”~ of ~“seven...”~'s ~“hidden”~ in the book of ~“Revelation”~! Do you think ~“this”~ ~“physical evidence”~ of ~“Spiritual Intelligence”~(i.e.~“God”~)might cause more of ~“us”~ to sit up and take notice of what it ~“truly”~ means to ~“Love thy neighbour as thyself.”~! ~“Coincidence is God's way of remaining anonymous.”~ A.Einstein
a77white 9 months ago
A Brilliant message...I'll definitly share this with others. Saw his 3 hours special and agree with Graham 100%.
2minstral 9 months ago
Just how open-minded are you? A document that was mailed unsolicited to Lawrence Spencer in 2007 will test that, and fascinate the truth-seeker...google 'alien interview' and see.
BethWithes 9 months ago
What I found really strange is how he says that scientific evidence is now being piled up to prove these theories yet he then says that science doesn't satisfy because it tries to reduce things to molecules. This is wrong, science doesn't try and do that. Science is a just a method of observing, testing, and understanding of our surroundings. It also has no shame in admitting when it is wrong and redefining itself. If human species is older then archeologists claim then that is still science.
LambdaQuarks 9 months ago
@LambdaQuarks Modern mainstream science is incredibly watered down and tampered with. Let's not ignore the fact that there is over a century worth of top secret research that has gone on and has still not been revealed to the public. In fact, there is probably way more than that, maybe you never heard of the inquisition and the burning of the Library of Alexandria. Not all of the information discovered was destroyed, but there are plenty of secrets we will never know because it's hidden
DimensionalVibration 8 months ago
@DimensionalVibration
There maybe hidden technologies and researches. I don't doubt the research but I can't contemplate much something I know nothing about or am ignorant of. Basically, until proven otherwise it might as well be a conspiracy theory.
LambdaQuarks 8 months ago
@LambdaQuarks Hancock isn't really doing that either, his theories are based on imperical evidence, and to be honest, it's harder to believe that these findings are merely coincidence than to believe that civilization dates to a much earlier date than widely accepted. Let's put it this way, without contemplation of the unknown, humans would still be hunter gatherers with no means of moving forward... get my drift?
DimensionalVibration 8 months ago
@DimensionalVibration I wouldn't dis-agree with that. I would say that claiming that the structures are older is a viable theory. I combat and refuse to accept the ancient aliens theories only, they have no credible support for it all. It is far more likely that the ancient people were simply better stone builders then us as that is what they worked with their entire lives and devoted thousands of laborers to tasks. I just didn't like is rant against science when he uses it himself as you say.
LambdaQuarks 8 months ago
I do think some of these sites are older then what archeologists claim and this man has a point however then come in the stupid idiots yelling aliens did it and ruin science all together.
LambdaQuarks 9 months ago
@LambdaQuarks Well, as farfetched as it may sound, it's not completely out of the realm of possibility. I'm not saying it's true, but like you said earlier, none of us were there to witness what actually happened, and so we have to go by what we do know. I've specifically heard Hancock say that these supposed "Gods" are entities that exist outside of physicality and who materialize in the form of DMT experiences and Shamanic visions. Knowing what we know about DMT, that's more believable...
DimensionalVibration 8 months ago
@DimensionalVibration Still... science is so full of mysterious discoveries (even mainstream science) that I can't completely rule out any possibilities. I think the important thing is to have an open mind and a positive outlook, and take in everything you can, whether or not you believe it to be true. Knowledge is what allows us to grow and evolve. Without all the true and false out there, we wouldn't know what to shoot for in this fleeting life we share as the human race.
DimensionalVibration 8 months ago
@DimensionalVibration
There is no credible support at all to even begin to suggest alien intervention. Might as well say midgets from the center of the earth did it because humans needed help and we don't know how they did it. There has to be a reason why science would even debate a theory or claim it a possibility. The age of structures could be different then what we thought all the time, but aliens flying around to help civilizations build giant buildings out of rock? How likely is that?
LambdaQuarks 8 months ago
@LambdaQuarks I don't know how many "credible" sources there actually are out there, but I honestly don't think the people who claim to be credible sources are too credible either. That's why I said that it doesn't hurt to look at all possibilities, regardless of the conclusions you come up with yourself. In fact, the sources who believe the ancient aliens theories are more credible imo than the ones who disregard it as "science fiction" because those people have lied too many times.
DimensionalVibration 8 months ago
@LambdaQuarks I am kind of stumped on what you consider "credible support" and what scientist that go against the teachings of mainstream science. There is proof that ancient civilization had a technology that we, with our modern tools, would even today have difficulty duplicating. There is no denying that if these structures are not built by cavemen. They had an understanding of life and purpose, and because they died a many of years ago makes them less credible? Do you believe in aliens?
thetexanfan 7 months ago
@thetexanfan
I was speaking of the credibility of the alien theory. Not that ancient man may have been wiser or more advanced than originally thought. Why are you asking me if I believe in Aliens? I think that is a silly question. I know that there is a chance that life may have evolved somewhere else but I have no clue as to the probability of such a second event as here on earth and the probability of them being intelligent.
LambdaQuarks 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This man is my God!
TheMacRipper 9 months ago
This man is my God!
TheMacRipper 9 months ago
The size of his head says it all 15:10 . no wonder he is so smart.
carlmcdonald777 9 months ago
I would also build my buildings away from fault lines!
5757floyd 10 months ago
Progress is controlled. Intelligence is controlled. Otherwise, the controllers would not be able to control. I hope you all can understand why someone like me would not tell you the truth as it would defy my livelihood and my families lives. We need to stay ahead of the underlings whom do not know the truths, otherwise we would have no control over them. We limit intelligence in children we do not want to ascend to our selves. There is more.
5757floyd 10 months ago
I agree with him that this civilization it has a common source,but it was created before the great deluge and not after!,..THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO!....BY THE CYCLOPS!....
nixter888 10 months ago
Look at the Lion Gate at Mycenae,..WHICH IS NOT ONLY 4000 YEARS OLD AS THEY SAY,...BUT MORE THAN 12000 YEARS OLD!!!!...NO MORE LIES!..WE WANT THE TRUTH!!!!
nixter888 10 months ago
Does the name Incari=Ίκαροs say something to you ..my dear Graham Hancock?.Do you know anything about Ñaupamachus =Ναυπαυμάχους..Do you know anything about the bearded Dion-an= Ντίον-Αν and Ηρακάν= Heracles?.. .The people of the place know!!!PAY ATTENTION TO THEIR STORY!!!!
nixter888 10 months ago
As a child I INSTANTLY rejected the "usual American religion" which I considered to be just as silly and illogical as believing in the tooth fairy... I couldnt of believed in it even if I wanted too... I also sensed the grossly incomplete explanation given by main stream science on this issue which ironically contradicts itself in the end... But this theory fits PERFECTLY in the grand puzzle "at least in my perception" Anyone involved in researching this field KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK!
lmos26 10 months ago
Thank goodness for the open mind
lmos26 10 months ago
I don't think we understand just how staggering it is that an ancient South American culture, with limited sophistication, produced a complete calender and time system before anyone in the New World
When you really consider this lone fact, knowledge from very ancient and advanced unknown culture is the only realistic answer.
qazyman 10 months ago
Hancock is the Copernicus and Socrats of of modern day. When I read "fringerprints" a few years ago I was so astounded to finally feel that I was not alone in my thinking...
petrinaandbruno 10 months ago
Big Fan!! Read his book "Finger Prints of the Gods" and he is the real deal as a researcher for the truth in science, origins, mythology and archaeology. I will read all his books eventually.. : )
markerf16 11 months ago
showing the way
darktim99 11 months ago
This is one of the most intelligent brains on the planet..
hottyfromnotty 1 year ago 40
@hottyfromnotty yep can't argue with that.
Revival1969 9 months ago
Concrete Into Dust, 9/11, The Demolition Job.
onedollarwill 1 year ago
Graham is extremely articulate.
He presents his findings and his long-though theories with absolute clarity.
I have looked at both sides of the model, and Graham is right...the mainstream model is lacking and, in a lot of cases, ignorant of very important evidence.
I find it an insult to the intelligence of my fellow man and myself that we are expected to swallow so many phenomenal things on this planet as "coincidence."
I mean come on people....you cannot be that naive.
RealityQuestioned 1 year ago 52
@RealityQuestioned not that naive but that ignorant..
jewpalegay 8 months ago
@RealityQuestioned This probably is the first video I have seen of Graham and I would not consider this explanation is clear ! May be there are things in today's state of knowledge based on this piece I would not consider anything that he is proposing to be true. He leaves a lot of question unanswered and with his eloquence undermines proofs that are needed for such a massive assertion....Not satisfied!
pinkyush 7 months ago
I find his assertions that scientists would not accept new ideas preposterous. That is the precise definition of being a scientist. I have read about a lot of Scientist/biologist/ who have accepted thier mistakes and models when there is evidence to the contrary. The idea that ALL the scientist ignore evidence just for the sake of their livelihood is WRONG.Dead WRONG.
pinkyush 7 months ago
@RealityQuestioned we are above the squandering benevolence
rhombusskullvsteal 5 months ago
How many times can he say the same thing over and over again?!!...
It's good information, but is repetitive.
ivan1313 1 year ago
@ScottishNonBeliever
Agreed, brother. From what I can tell, the only way is for there to be a collective uprising (what are the odds with such a divided, apathetic public?) or if people go back to the entheogens. Truly, I think the latter is integral if this current enigma of self deceit is ever to unravel. One can only hope! Cheers!
TheDreamMechanic 1 year ago
Legend.
TheDreamMechanic 1 year ago
Anyone who describes what science is uncovering about the mysteries of life as "dry and sterile" hasn't been reading up on science, let alone looking at pictures from the Hubble or checking out the awesome finds of the Kepler or Cassini missions. Those who want to reject science for a greater mystery are usually just too damn lazy to read or think with a combination of open mind and discipline. Hancock, get off the (u) tube !
Altunivurz 1 year ago
@Altunivurz
You are incorrect, sir. The point Hancock is making is that science has failed us in the way of becoming institutionalized. Sure, advances in technology are fantastic; the Hubble telescope is one of the more important scientific instruments created by mankind. But, in terms of what's happening here on earth, historically speaking, its current paradigm is severely lacking, and in its dogmatism rejecting a mountain of evidence, thereby circumventing the scientific method itself.
TheDreamMechanic 1 year ago 4
Anyone who describes what science is uncovering about the mysteries of life as "dry and sterile" hasn't been reading up on science, let alone looking at pictures from the Hubble or checking out the awesome finds of the Kepler or Cassini missions. Those who want to reject science for a greater mystery are usually just too damn lazy to read or think with a combination of open mind and discipline. Hancock, get off the (u) tube !
Altunivurz 1 year ago
graham for international president
blankplanet 1 year ago
Graham is so convincing. If only hed let me research with him id decipher and activate all the devices left by the ancients and run away with the secret and no one will ever know that it happened.
fleshtheworld 1 year ago
Comments like these are exactly why we are doomed as a civilization. "I like the word titi caca, I can't watch your videos because of large 'inserts", "My Ipod's loading time is too long", "Would you like fries with that?" etc. Our spiritual halves are so hollow that the balance that's supposed to make up a true human being is missing. The spiritual (and economic) bills are coming due real soon. I hope you are ready.
magician18able 1 year ago 2
I can't watch your videos due to the overly large "inserts" you have placed over the videos advertising yourself.
fmbhebrews111 1 year ago
Yes, this reminds me that I have been fascinated with Egypt since I was very young, so young I don't remember how I first heard of it. But a dream I had when I was really young and impressed me to remember it well was when I went into a huge hall and there were thing like coffins standing in rows, but they had glass doors..and one I walked up to looked like a king with his eyes closed...and I was startled to think he was my father! Not the one I actually had! I still wonder why....
Licmycat 1 year ago
I love the word "titi caca"
MercuryRis 1 year ago
In another word do not do a knee jerk no.
darrellmellissa 1 year ago