Nice! However, a bit difficult to see since it is for parallel eyed technique instead of the cross eyed one. Why don't you use the youtube 3D viewing options/implementation? It gives you a lot of options.
I always use parallel when I can get away with it. I think I have an aversion to the cross-eye technique because it makes images appear smaller (the same absolute size and nearer.)
You don't have to move your eyes apart to see the effect. Just keep them parallel exactly the same way as if you were looking at "infinite" (eg. mountains landscape). The difficult part is to have the eyes focused to a close image while their orientation is the corresponding to far images, but when you get a glimpse of one 3D image the eyes tend to "lock" and it becomes much easy to see the remaining of the movie.
I really enjoyed that (but my eyes do feel a bit weird now!). Do you mind me asking how you filmed this? I'm trying to get into building a stereoscopic camera and have considered the challenges of creating stereo video, but issues like synchronising the films and compiling the two streams into one struck me as a bit of a hurdle to overcome. You must have figured this out! Love the sequence with the dog :-D
If you look at the first few seconds of the 3D Memphis movie, you will notice me shining a small light at the cameras. This is how I establish sync between the cameras, much the same way a clapper slate used to in the movie industry (but with Left picture - right picture rather than picture - sound.) The first frame in the left camera where the light is lit corresponds with the first frame in the right camera where the light is lit. One can of course use motion of any kind to "eyeball" sync
Very cool. With practice it becomes easy unassisted... I know a man who did this with aerial photographs for the Military in Korea. I learned with 'Magic Eye' pictures in the 1990s. Thanks for your interest!
Parallel is much easier. It is like five times clearer and has no afterward haedaches.
Bigbadburrows2 6 months ago
Am i supposed to see 3 screens with middle one in 3D?
reknakgjirk4life 11 months ago 2
It was all going so well until that bloomin head appeared and my eyes instinctively tried to look him in the eyes. Couldn't get it back after that.
psycho192000 1 year ago
Thumbs up if when you cross your eyes the video turns HD
RazDaz2000 1 year ago
parallel is way easyer than crossed eye, idk why people prefer crossed eye
EmoKid7945 1 year ago
Nice! However, a bit difficult to see since it is for parallel eyed technique instead of the cross eyed one. Why don't you use the youtube 3D viewing options/implementation? It gives you a lot of options.
slayerdme 2 years ago
I suppose I should, so I will. Thanks!
doctormagicslab 2 years ago
I always use parallel when I can get away with it. I think I have an aversion to the cross-eye technique because it makes images appear smaller (the same absolute size and nearer.)
doctormagicslab 2 years ago
That was sweet.
Jesusdragon737 2 years ago
Oh wow that is amazing! But hard to focus since it is not the crossed eye method, but it makes it so much better!
AlivePierre 2 years ago
Aw, I wish this was the cross-eyed style. I can't do the kind where you have to move your eyes away form eachother to see it.
All you'd have to do though is switch the videos.
cdsand 3 years ago
@cdsand
You don't have to move your eyes apart to see the effect. Just keep them parallel exactly the same way as if you were looking at "infinite" (eg. mountains landscape). The difficult part is to have the eyes focused to a close image while their orientation is the corresponding to far images, but when you get a glimpse of one 3D image the eyes tend to "lock" and it becomes much easy to see the remaining of the movie.
AntoniaPuigdomenec 2 years ago
I really enjoyed that (but my eyes do feel a bit weird now!). Do you mind me asking how you filmed this? I'm trying to get into building a stereoscopic camera and have considered the challenges of creating stereo video, but issues like synchronising the films and compiling the two streams into one struck me as a bit of a hurdle to overcome. You must have figured this out! Love the sequence with the dog :-D
rowgli 3 years ago
If you look at the first few seconds of the 3D Memphis movie, you will notice me shining a small light at the cameras. This is how I establish sync between the cameras, much the same way a clapper slate used to in the movie industry (but with Left picture - right picture rather than picture - sound.) The first frame in the left camera where the light is lit corresponds with the first frame in the right camera where the light is lit. One can of course use motion of any kind to "eyeball" sync
doctormagicslab 3 years ago
That was nice and 3D
PerfectBlindness 3 years ago
Do you use a stereoscope or diverge your eyes unassisted?
doctormagicslab 3 years ago
And thank you! (It is extra 3D because of the broad interocular distance and because I am using fisheye lens attachments.)
doctormagicslab 3 years ago
I use stereoscope. It's way to hard otherwise. Atleast, for me.
PerfectBlindness 3 years ago
Very cool. With practice it becomes easy unassisted... I know a man who did this with aerial photographs for the Military in Korea. I learned with 'Magic Eye' pictures in the 1990s. Thanks for your interest!
doctormagicslab 3 years ago