any that says children shouldnt be on the internet is retarded or will end up having retarded children. there are so many educational resources as well communication apps that denying children internet is like not teaching him to read. the internet is the future and children need to know how to use it!
@pixeljuice i totally agree with pixeljuice exept for the children have no bussiness on the web part... i knew about sex/prostitution/drugs/torture/fetishes way before i saw my first porn movie on a pc at around 8 so why should children not be allowed access to information ? So you can wake up being 18 years old and regret having wasted 10 years not learning all the intreresting stuff you can find online ?
@pixeljuice I agree with you, but the problem is the kids are getting on anyway for whatever reason. Maybe if there's some sort of consequence for failure to set up parental controls.... like a fine, for example.
@Houshalter I think that was part of his point in saying"Children have no business on the web. Their usage of the net should be overseen by their parents &any accidental (or intentional) viewing of inappropriate content is their responsibility to reprimand."Some anount of parental control wether by direct supervision or a degree of parental controls on puter is necessary for their own safety. But hey! I agree with U that puters can be a marvelous tool for innovation,creativity &certain freedoms.
To give support FOSI and Stephen Balkam supports a government regulated internet, and enables the censorship of information on it.
I have not asked for your help "protecting" my children. You fail in your attempt to use fear to manipulate me, for one. I do not support allowing a single degree of control over the web to anyone who might at any point have any cause to censor information.
@pixeljuice I think that children should be able to share the internet like we all do. Of course they should be taught how not to interact and what is not logical on this free marketplace of ideas.
@JohanAtheist And that includes defense against possible predators! But then again. I have this nice new shotgun I'm dying to try out. Predators showing up at my doorstep would give me PLENTY of opportunity.... :-)
REHAERHGHR, if you want two schools from across the world working together on a project, set up a god damn VLAN and some servers on either end, you don't have to regulate the damn internet to make it safe for such things.
@Houshalter Exactly. It's a good thing to introduce the bad things to children early so when they are on their own they will be prepared for the ugly truth behind this corrupt world. Is the government really turning into a Socialist government? = 3=;
@Houshalter OH and what are u gona do to stop them? It can happen any fuckin time, any Year any Date, and it shud be a huge Attack this Year Prob before Winter
@IvanDripsOoze, You can't necessarily stop them, but you can always make a "new" internet if things get hairy, but unfortunatley they haven't pushed it that far yet. My problem with the internet is that its fundamentally designed to be able to track people over it via IP adresses and it has lost the flexibility and resilience it was originally intended to have, (cont...)
@Houshalter you would be totally incorrect about them not pushing it that far. it is already being built. Get online and search for internet 2.0. It focuses more on digital citizenship as well as other specifics geared to assist law enforcement/gov regulation. It's main focuses of coarse will be on the money; i.e. id theft, cc fraud, copyright infringement etc. And to assist it further the governement has starting putting international copyrights into treaties for international relations.
@kyleacampbell, can't find any "internet 2.0". Theres web 2.0, but its not the same thing. "Assisting" "law enforcement" is not an excuse, and is not a good thing at all. Its one thing with ID theft and pirating, but attempts to stop those ALREADY go to far. Get some good encryption and anti-decompilers and don't complain to the rest of us. And definitley don't do it to "protect the children". What a joke. As I said, if it comes to it we'll have to build a new internet.
(...cont) tons of independent systems or networks that connected and let traffic through instead of a hierarchy. Combined with good encryption and other security that would be the individuals responsibility to have, this system would be virtually immune to attempts at external regulation. Not to mention that the world wide web itself is privatley owned and a handful of companies have monopolies over all the services on it.
@JohanAtheist, of course I don't have to. Thats like what Hitler said to the Jews. "If you weren't Jewish you wouldn't be here now would you?" MONOPOLIES ARE NOT GOOD.
@Houshalter Sounds somewhat similar to a line I use to get out of jury duty. "Of course he/she is guilty! They wouldn't be here if they WEREN'T!" It also helps to wear a nazi helmut and a swastika tattoo (not real) on your arm.
LoL! No, I really don't do that, but my employer suggested I do that to get out of it.
@bcw324, There are a lot of people with paranoid conspiracy theories, but in reality the government always tries to regulate and take over things that it has no business taking over. Its not as bad as in other countries though, which already filter the web like the UK, Australia, or China.
@Houshalter I wish someone would regulate the internet. anytime I try to find a resource online I have to wade through all the crap and scams that clogs the internet.
@bcw324, Then go invent a "private internet" and you can regulate it all the fuck you want. I'm serious. If its such a good idea, theres no need for government to actually do it. You can create a list of approved or disaproved websites and then use a search engine like google that simply filters out all the crap. Since its private, you can create as many different systems as you like. Theres no need for the government to regulate it at all.
@Houshalter yeah go watch your internet porn with your little children while getting trojans and viruses up the ass....don't forget identity theft either thats always fun for the family you retard!!!!
@bcw324, Tada: Antivirus software! WTF does that have to do with internet regulation anyway? Immagine if the government tried to filter the internet from viruses. People would get a false sense of security, companies that make this software would suffer or not even exist and we would all pay for it.
Because our government IS always trying to get us. Didn't you see that in George W. Bush? If you let the big boys have total control, they screw the whole world over.
@greling what like the patriot act? yes sometimes shit is f-ed up but you can't fight every attempt the government makes that many times are genuinely for the well being of the people. pick your battles
@bcw324 Sometimes they are. lol! Many times the fear is because we do lots of nasty stuff behind closed doors. If the government only knew. Muhahahahaha!
No, but seriously, there is a fear of unwarranted oppression and control. People screw each other over big time, and stab their own family in the back over a few dollars. Why would the government be any different? I don't know.... but you are right: much paranoia floating around in our culture. Some of it is reality, not paranoia.
Comment removed
Stirner123 1 year ago
Comment removed
Stirner123 1 year ago
any that says children shouldnt be on the internet is retarded or will end up having retarded children. there are so many educational resources as well communication apps that denying children internet is like not teaching him to read. the internet is the future and children need to know how to use it!
bcw324 1 year ago
This guy is frightening. He sounds like a new world order propaganda shill to me.
craiglings104 1 year ago
@pixeljuice i totally agree with pixeljuice exept for the children have no bussiness on the web part... i knew about sex/prostitution/drugs/torture/fetishes way before i saw my first porn movie on a pc at around 8 so why should children not be allowed access to information ? So you can wake up being 18 years old and regret having wasted 10 years not learning all the intreresting stuff you can find online ?
Ph33onix 1 year ago
@pixeljuice I agree with you, but the problem is the kids are getting on anyway for whatever reason. Maybe if there's some sort of consequence for failure to set up parental controls.... like a fine, for example.
Upritebass 1 year ago
@Upritebass, A fine for not setting up parental controls!?!?!? Thats not the point of what he was saying!
" there is a fear of unwarranted oppression and control."
More like government beuracracy and regulations that bog down innovation and freedoms.
Houshalter 1 year ago
@Houshalter I think that was part of his point in saying"Children have no business on the web. Their usage of the net should be overseen by their parents &any accidental (or intentional) viewing of inappropriate content is their responsibility to reprimand."Some anount of parental control wether by direct supervision or a degree of parental controls on puter is necessary for their own safety. But hey! I agree with U that puters can be a marvelous tool for innovation,creativity &certain freedoms.
Upritebass 1 year ago
To give support FOSI and Stephen Balkam supports a government regulated internet, and enables the censorship of information on it.
I have not asked for your help "protecting" my children. You fail in your attempt to use fear to manipulate me, for one. I do not support allowing a single degree of control over the web to anyone who might at any point have any cause to censor information.
demitriusjp 1 year ago 3
@pixeljuice I think that children should be able to share the internet like we all do. Of course they should be taught how not to interact and what is not logical on this free marketplace of ideas.
JohanAtheist 1 year ago
@JohanAtheist And that includes defense against possible predators! But then again. I have this nice new shotgun I'm dying to try out. Predators showing up at my doorstep would give me PLENTY of opportunity.... :-)
Upritebass 1 year ago
hes defining something that's been going on since the dawn of the internet. nothing new here, move along.
iTailsTheStunter 1 year ago
0:16 to 0:22: RUN!!! IT'S GOING TO GET YOU!
0:32 to 0:39: IT'S WATCHING YOU WATCHING YOU WATCHING IT WATCHING YOU!!!
0:40 to 0:46: IT'S COMING AGAIN!
I shouldn't watch Evil Dead anymore.
stmk0 1 year ago
FUSSY?
tsuikjoshiomatsu 1 year ago
@pixeljuice amen to that
Tmoney211 1 year ago
i knew from the still he would be boring :(
AdiLovesYou 1 year ago
FUCK DAT SHIT
diareahmaster 1 year ago
@pixeljuice 10/4 on this one.
soska247 1 year ago
lol HEY KIDS! NIGGERFAGGOT COCKSUCKING KIKE TRANNY DICKS! STEAL EVERYTHING @ THE PIRATE BAY .ORG LOOK AT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY ON 4CHAN GO TO PORNHUB!
there I did my part.
Jaistar2k22 1 year ago
That nigga doesnt know what the internet is used for.....
FlamingDwagon 1 year ago
REHAERHGHR, if you want two schools from across the world working together on a project, set up a god damn VLAN and some servers on either end, you don't have to regulate the damn internet to make it safe for such things.
SiyamakSordes 1 year ago 2
Ever so clever, aren't they.
mindprism 1 year ago 2
we dont need the jews taking over the internet also.
truegwbfan 1 year ago
@truegwbfan LOL jews Own the Net Retard.....
IvanDripsOoze 1 year ago
@IvanDripsOoze very much so
soska247 1 year ago
Digital citizenship. What a joke. Its an excuse for governments to regulate the internet. Don't let them.
Houshalter 1 year ago 11
@Houshalter Exactly. It's a good thing to introduce the bad things to children early so when they are on their own they will be prepared for the ugly truth behind this corrupt world. Is the government really turning into a Socialist government? = 3=;
JesykaL 1 year ago
@JesykaL LOL u have alot to Learn, Try Neo Fascist.....
IvanDripsOoze 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IvanDripsOoze the same there
soska247 1 year ago
@Houshalter OH and what are u gona do to stop them? It can happen any fuckin time, any Year any Date, and it shud be a huge Attack this Year Prob before Winter
IvanDripsOoze 1 year ago
@IvanDripsOoze, You can't necessarily stop them, but you can always make a "new" internet if things get hairy, but unfortunatley they haven't pushed it that far yet. My problem with the internet is that its fundamentally designed to be able to track people over it via IP adresses and it has lost the flexibility and resilience it was originally intended to have, (cont...)
Houshalter 1 year ago
@Houshalter you would be totally incorrect about them not pushing it that far. it is already being built. Get online and search for internet 2.0. It focuses more on digital citizenship as well as other specifics geared to assist law enforcement/gov regulation. It's main focuses of coarse will be on the money; i.e. id theft, cc fraud, copyright infringement etc. And to assist it further the governement has starting putting international copyrights into treaties for international relations.
kyleacampbell 1 year ago
@kyleacampbell, can't find any "internet 2.0". Theres web 2.0, but its not the same thing. "Assisting" "law enforcement" is not an excuse, and is not a good thing at all. Its one thing with ID theft and pirating, but attempts to stop those ALREADY go to far. Get some good encryption and anti-decompilers and don't complain to the rest of us. And definitley don't do it to "protect the children". What a joke. As I said, if it comes to it we'll have to build a new internet.
Houshalter 1 year ago
(...cont) tons of independent systems or networks that connected and let traffic through instead of a hierarchy. Combined with good encryption and other security that would be the individuals responsibility to have, this system would be virtually immune to attempts at external regulation. Not to mention that the world wide web itself is privatley owned and a handful of companies have monopolies over all the services on it.
Houshalter 1 year ago
@Houshalter You don't have to be part of it mate^^
JohanAtheist 1 year ago
@JohanAtheist, of course I don't have to. Thats like what Hitler said to the Jews. "If you weren't Jewish you wouldn't be here now would you?" MONOPOLIES ARE NOT GOOD.
Houshalter 1 year ago
@Houshalter Sounds somewhat similar to a line I use to get out of jury duty. "Of course he/she is guilty! They wouldn't be here if they WEREN'T!" It also helps to wear a nazi helmut and a swastika tattoo (not real) on your arm.
LoL! No, I really don't do that, but my employer suggested I do that to get out of it.
Upritebass 1 year ago
@Houshalter why are americans so paranoid you always think your government is trying get you LOL
bcw324 1 year ago
@bcw324, There are a lot of people with paranoid conspiracy theories, but in reality the government always tries to regulate and take over things that it has no business taking over. Its not as bad as in other countries though, which already filter the web like the UK, Australia, or China.
Houshalter 1 year ago
@Houshalter I wish someone would regulate the internet. anytime I try to find a resource online I have to wade through all the crap and scams that clogs the internet.
bcw324 1 year ago
@bcw324, Then go invent a "private internet" and you can regulate it all the fuck you want. I'm serious. If its such a good idea, theres no need for government to actually do it. You can create a list of approved or disaproved websites and then use a search engine like google that simply filters out all the crap. Since its private, you can create as many different systems as you like. Theres no need for the government to regulate it at all.
Houshalter 1 year ago
@Houshalter yeah go watch your internet porn with your little children while getting trojans and viruses up the ass....don't forget identity theft either thats always fun for the family you retard!!!!
bcw324 1 year ago
@bcw324, Tada: Antivirus software! WTF does that have to do with internet regulation anyway? Immagine if the government tried to filter the internet from viruses. People would get a false sense of security, companies that make this software would suffer or not even exist and we would all pay for it.
Houshalter 1 year ago
@bcw324:
Because our government IS always trying to get us. Didn't you see that in George W. Bush? If you let the big boys have total control, they screw the whole world over.
greling 1 year ago
@greling what like the patriot act? yes sometimes shit is f-ed up but you can't fight every attempt the government makes that many times are genuinely for the well being of the people. pick your battles
bcw324 1 year ago
@bcw324 Sometimes they are. lol! Many times the fear is because we do lots of nasty stuff behind closed doors. If the government only knew. Muhahahahaha!
No, but seriously, there is a fear of unwarranted oppression and control. People screw each other over big time, and stab their own family in the back over a few dollars. Why would the government be any different? I don't know.... but you are right: much paranoia floating around in our culture. Some of it is reality, not paranoia.
Upritebass 1 year ago