Added: 4 years ago
From: AssociatedPress
Views: 37,538
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (64)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ornithocheirus skull 0:06

  • Okay, so if only small animals survived the mass extinction, why did this this little guy vanish while birds survived?

  • @javitr91 the earth is about 4 billion years old. Get the fact right. 8000? Not even close.

    You were probably a uneducated hillbilly. No offense to other hillbillys.

  • Cryptozoology novel see video book trailer

  • how can something have existed 120 million years ago when the world is only 8000 years old?

  • @javitr91

    *face palm*

  • @javitr91 my god have you miss some part of your education, earth is only 8000 year old, that was really great information hahahahahaha

  • @javitr91 congrats, you have won the record for the stupidest person on earth.

  • @javitr91 You naive naive simpleton...

  • @javitr91 8000 years old?!?! twit.

  • it probally says on the side *made in china*...."uh oh we're cought"

  • pokemon

  • *gasp* pokemon!

    XD

    epic, i didn't mean to say that. sorry

  • Evolution is for dummies creationist smart. And it won't take millions and millions of years to figure that out

  • @vyizzy *facepalm*

  • better lock it up the chinese will find sum way to use it as food

  • SO not a dinosaur. Bad reporting. It's just a flying reptile! people need to know the difference! It is important in understanding trends in evolution.

  • iTS A DEAD EXTINCT BAT SHIT HEAD

  • @Ultramediacorp Nope. you clearly know nothing about bat anatomy. IT IS NOT AN EXTINCT BAT, IT BELONGS TO THE GROUP PTEROSAURS. Bats are more like primates than flying reptiles. Look it up and pay attention to bone structure.

  • @Lesouder5555Nature the BONE structure!! HA HA HA YOU DUMB SON OF A BITCH! HOW THE FUCK DO YOU KNOW IT ISN'T AN EXTINCT BAT SHIT HEAD!

    WHAT TELLS YOU IT WAS A REPTILE? THE SCALES? ha ha ha THE BEAK? H HA HA THEY JUST RECENTLY ADMITTED BRONTOSAURUS NEVER EXISTED AND WITH ALL THE FAKE FOSSILS COMING OUT OF CHINA WHO THE FUCK KNOWS ITS REAL. WHEN MOST ARE NOT

  • @Ultramediacorp YES, they admitted the brontosaurus was a mix up of 2 different dinosaurs. THAT WAS BEFORE I WAS BORN AND I"M 25 YEARS OLD. YOU CLAIM IT WAS RECENT. YOU JUST PROVED HOW LITTLE YO KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC. IF YOU TAKE A CLOSE LOOK AT THE BONE STRUCTURE OF THIS ANIMAL, YOU CAN SEE IT LOOKS JUST LIKE A PTEROSAUR. OPEN YOUR FUCKING EYES!!!!!!

  • @Lesouder5555Nature

    Actually the Brontosaur was just the same species named twice, so they went back to the original name Apatosaurus. This occurred in about 1908? In the 70s though, they realized the skull they believed associated with it wasn't, when they realized the true skull was more like a Diplodocus skull.

  • @Lagomort I was talking about the animal in the video when i mentioned the skull, read further back on this comment board to find out why

  • @Lesouder5555Nature

    I read your posts. I do not know what you are saying here. I was explaining that there were "2 mix-ups" not one, and people often treat them as one.

  • @Lagomort Ahhh i see what you're saying, it's was 2 that were mixed. ultramediacorp Thinks a mix up like the Brontosaur is common as well as fake fossils also being common. This is his claim " HA HA THEY JUST RECENTLY ADMITTED BRONTOSAURUS NEVER EXISTED AND WITH ALL THE FAKE FOSSILS COMING OUT OF CHINA WHO THE FUCK KNOWS ITS REAL. WHEN MOST ARE NOT " so according to him most fossils from china are fakes! he has also never seen a bat skeleton apparently.

  • @Lagomort I just wanted to correct him on his bat claim.

  • @Lesouder5555Nature

    I knew what you were doing and agreed with it fully. I was just explaining the mix up was not that the animal never existed,but that a smaller segment of bone was named Apatosaurus first, and then a more full skeleton was later found and described as a new sauropod (Brontosaurus) by the same guy (OC Marsh) that discovered the Apatosaurus. Tradition has it that the name goes to what was named first. This all occurred over a hundred years ago or so...

  • @Ultramediacorp

    Because it is extremely easy to tell the difference between a bat and a pterosaur. For example, the whole hand (as in all the digits) are involved in forming the wing foil in bats, and only one digit forms the front edge of the wing foil in pterosaurs. From head to tail, they are markedly different in structure.

  • is that the fossil find only in the pokemon movie?^^

  • lol....

  • I'm sorry BUT THAT AIN'T NO DINOSAUR! IT'S BEFORE THEM DINOS, GOT IT?!! OK, GOOD!

  • @geoffreyah well they co-existed for millions of years, but You may be correct on them being more prehistoric than dinosaurs.

  • to be honest no one can say for certain because you just dont fucking know ! you can say this or that for all we know that fossil could be fake. you sitting in front of your p.c. dosent know shit!

  • @OstoneAustin Ok so their bloody lying then, but it would be nice to see it trpped in a piece of Amber or somethshit.

  • Pterosaurs are NOT dinosaurs...... They are just flying reptiles. Plain and simple. The don't have the necessary bones to be classified as dinosaurs + dinosaurs use feathers to fly, NOT skinned wings like Pterosaurs.

  • @Leonesaurus13000 dummas... its not the bones that made it a dinosaure... its the period it lived in! eg, crotacious period, jurasic period, ( jurasic beign the period of the dinosaurs ) and so on.

  • scientist believe in pokemon.

  • me 2

  • right and you must believe in a fairy god father....moron

  • Ancestor of modern chicken

  • I know the name of this critter:

    Nemicolopterus

    if u cant get it i'll slow it down 4 u

    NE MI CO LO PTER US

    [silent p]

  • Pterosaurs were Archosaur soops(did i shpell dat right?

  • i believe arceopterics and archoesuars were found to be fakes ,,, i wonder about this ?

  • 0:12 PURTRKULR hehe

  • Lol, this thing looks vey funny, would be my friend

  • pterosaurs weren't dinosaurs.

  • forget the past think about the future. muahaha

  • bring them back and watch them die with the planet.

    =P

  • not a dinosaur.

  • b0mb3at3r wrote: "perticuer" lol shes trying to say perticular

    Don't correct people's english if you can't spell the word you are trying to correct.

    particulAr, dumby

  • "perticuer" lol shes trying to say perticular

  • not a dinosaur it's called a pterrasaur

  • hey i think its a baby one

  • how do i get one?

  • CUTE

  • China? lol

  • A mini pterodactyl! I wish we could bring these long-extinct creatures back to life.

  • yeah that would be so cool.While we're at it,we should bring back some recently exstinct animals and regenerate endangered speices(spelling?).If only we had the tech...

  • I'm all for bringing extinct species back to life -- except I think they won't survive for long in today's extremely polluted world.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more