@KevJC79 They have about the same number of steps. The first 4 minutes and 14 seconds of the tutorial cover cropping and color correction. However if all your images are perfect you can skip right to the 4:14 mark of the video and start there and get your time lapse much faster. I took a look at Picasa and that is a great option for time lapses as well. Thanks for the recommendation.
Thanks for the help here, definitely helped my only question is why do all of my images look so pixelated? I'm drawing from 16MP photos and its looking like I shot them in VGA resolution.
help needed! when i open my images,then i select only first one and select "Image sequence" then open and export to render video. when "Render video" pops up i can not check "File options" QuickTime Export option , only "Image sequence" is selected.
This is very helpful, but I NOT have the image sequence box to check when I open my photos. I am using a mac. How do you do this on mac? Please help. Thanks
@pitiklins When you make changes to your JPGs in Camera Raw the adjustments are not applied directly to the JPG file. They are in a hidden sidecar file. This way you can go back and make changes without losing any image data. Bridge does not have its own image processor, but it uses Photoshop to process its images. You do not need to make adjustments in Camera Raw. If you are happy with your images you can take them right into Photoshop. Just go to time 4:13 in the video and start from there.
@pitiklins I'm guessing you are referring to Bridge CS4, if not let me know. To get a similar look that I have click on "FILMSTRIP" on the top of the screen. That will give you a large preview window and a strip of thumbnails, like a filmstrip from 35mm days, on the bottom. You can also go to "Window" and select the panels you would like. Also if you click "Window" -> "Workspace" that will give you more options for your workspace.
Yes and no. The higher the resolution of an image the more computer power it will take. For example, if you were to try this with 12.3 megapixel images, 4288x2848 pixels, it would cause more strain on your system. If you resized the images for YouTube HD, 1280 by 720 pixels, then created the time lapse in Photoshop, it would cause much less strain than the 12.3 megapixel images. The better your computer the higher resolution time lapses you can create. You can even put 1080p to shame.
Thanks man. You just saved all my timelapse work. I rendered them with a "timelapse assambler". But that one just sucked.
Thanks for showing how to do it with PS.
JarheadJoy 2 months ago
I had around 1200 pic's and my final file was 15 Gb. How do u make a smaller file ??
DDAEVIDZ 2 months ago
PICASA WAY EASIER
KevJC79 2 months ago
@KevJC79 They have about the same number of steps. The first 4 minutes and 14 seconds of the tutorial cover cropping and color correction. However if all your images are perfect you can skip right to the 4:14 mark of the video and start there and get your time lapse much faster. I took a look at Picasa and that is a great option for time lapses as well. Thanks for the recommendation.
sundinphoto 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Thanks for the help here, definitely helped my only question is why do all of my images look so pixelated? I'm drawing from 16MP photos and its looking like I shot them in VGA resolution.
jewishmafio 3 months ago
great video - thanks for sharing. Will put to use with my new d300s.
barryshapiro1 5 months ago
Thank you very much for the help Sir...
Jaycena007 6 months ago
help needed! when i open my images,then i select only first one and select "Image sequence" then open and export to render video. when "Render video" pops up i can not check "File options" QuickTime Export option , only "Image sequence" is selected.
bencosijek 7 months ago 3
This is very helpful, but I NOT have the image sequence box to check when I open my photos. I am using a mac. How do you do this on mac? Please help. Thanks
231blake 8 months ago
This only works with the extended version of photoshop, right?
seventunes 8 months ago
when i export my video it is huge like 530mb, is there a way i can make this smaller but retain the same quality?
MrPatcrane 1 year ago
This tutorial is nicely done. You do a good job getting a newbie (like me ;) through the process without going off on too many tangents.
mjm8218 1 year ago
AWESOME thank you i really like it :P
Demonods 1 year ago
Thanks a lot for the answer!!
I have another one... can you save the fotos directly from bridge after you make changes? I mean without use Photoshop.
pitiklins 1 year ago
@pitiklins When you make changes to your JPGs in Camera Raw the adjustments are not applied directly to the JPG file. They are in a hidden sidecar file. This way you can go back and make changes without losing any image data. Bridge does not have its own image processor, but it uses Photoshop to process its images. You do not need to make adjustments in Camera Raw. If you are happy with your images you can take them right into Photoshop. Just go to time 4:13 in the video and start from there.
sundinphoto 1 year ago
What is the first program you use??, before photoshop??
hahahahahasjovt 1 year ago
@hahahahahasjovt That would be Adobe Bridge, but don't worry it ships with almost all Adobe Products. If you have Photoshop, you have Bridge.
sundinphoto 1 year ago
How do I get that look in my CS4? I dont see the fotograms as thumbnail like in your video, tools are even not that same that I have :¿?
pitiklins 1 year ago
@pitiklins I'm guessing you are referring to Bridge CS4, if not let me know. To get a similar look that I have click on "FILMSTRIP" on the top of the screen. That will give you a large preview window and a strip of thumbnails, like a filmstrip from 35mm days, on the bottom. You can also go to "Window" and select the panels you would like. Also if you click "Window" -> "Workspace" that will give you more options for your workspace.
sundinphoto 1 year ago
@sundinphoto OK I see, a thought it was Photoshop itself, not Bridge. Thanks a lot for your explanation.
pitiklins 1 year ago
i guess ur gonna need a quite goot computer for that? :P
hejjaghetertoni 2 years ago
Yes and no. The higher the resolution of an image the more computer power it will take. For example, if you were to try this with 12.3 megapixel images, 4288x2848 pixels, it would cause more strain on your system. If you resized the images for YouTube HD, 1280 by 720 pixels, then created the time lapse in Photoshop, it would cause much less strain than the 12.3 megapixel images. The better your computer the higher resolution time lapses you can create. You can even put 1080p to shame.
sundinphoto 2 years ago