Added: 6 months ago
From: BritishForcesNews
Views: 8,856
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Completely agree! Has there ever been an HMS Nelson???

  • Instead of Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales they should be called Ark Royal and Hermes

  • @ToonandBBfan No... HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Ark Royal. In fact lets stop paying so much in foreign aid and benefits, buy another and call it HMS Queen Victoria.

  • @MrXray2011 yay lets cripple our nation further by calling for 3 aircraft carriers hoozah!

  • @rahulpower Yes I agree but lets call them HMS Queen Elizabeth, Ark Royal and Hermes respectively! Maybe HMS QE2 in honor of our current Queen? Or would that remind people too much of poop deck paradise than nasty scary war.. ?

  • @ToonandBBfan QE is good, she destroyed the Spanish Armada (1588) and so it is only fitting to call a ship after her, although 3 would be nice then the other two could be HMS Ark Royal and HMS Hermes although I would like on to be HMS Horation Nelson.

  • @MrXray2011 not to forget the last QE class of warship was a very successful Battleship class including the prestigious Warpite :)

  • between the us navy and the royal navy and their aircraft carriers and military force. I dont see how anyone would want to mess with these two allies.

  • They are building two but only one will be kitted out & be in service so whats the point? We should have kept our older smaller carriers & the Harrier!!!

  • @admiralpicard2010 a dont know where u seen that but its nonsence do you really think thre going to spend billions to not use it?

  • @thethreelions3 The aircraft ordered by the Royal Navy as I've heard, can't even land on the Carriers...

  • @parcourkid Yes, they can. The F-35 will be flown by the Royal Air Force and the Fleet Air Arm, they will all be fitted with Arrestor Wires so that both the RAF and FAA planes can fly off of the Queen Elizabeth Class!

  • @parcourkid They can't at the moment becuase the US have put the arrestor hook in the wrong place and so it cannot be caught properly.

  • Royal navy need both these carriers with out these ships Royal navy is nothing more then coastal defence force.

  • I don't see why we need aircraft carriers. What we need is a giant plane that can fly out and drop hundreds of submarines into war zones.

  • @carbonvein who else is going to protect us from an ever growing russian fleet that are ALLWAYS in our waters?

    we need there class carriers, along with the 40 F-35's and 40 euro fighters to be a world power, there is a world arms race going on...

  • god knows what our navy will be like by the time this sails .

  • I must say Mark Cosgrove is somewhat hard to understand, first I actually thought he spoke a diffrent then English

  • Government propaganda so as not to let the public think they're spending more cash on the military that people are crying out for else where. Both will be complete to angled flight deck + cat and trap spec so as to allow all year round carrier capability. End of

  • Yeah but with all these cuts we might not even be sailing them

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more