Nuclear power produces plutonium and death. Burning fossil fuels increases life on earth, but over the last 200 years has not increased there carbon dioxide in the air.
Medics and nuclear engineers have told me about the gamma wave radiation emission from a beating heart. These people are PhD academics are working engineers. The heart gives off radiation, try a Geiger counter on your self: though your heart may have some years ago air.
You can take your pulse with a Geiger counter. As the pressure waves caused by your heart beat do molecular nuclear fusion. That is in the medical textbooks. Green plants in the light also give off gamma wave radiation. This time it is in the biology text books
Waterfalls, breaking waves, photosynthesis and animal blood systems give off nuclear radiation. Nuclear power adopted global warming as idea after Chernobyl 1986. QED
You've made two unsupported statements ("there is nuclear fusion going on all around us", and "Climate change is nuclear fiction"). Both are nonsense. I'm guessing you pronounce it "New-Cue-Ler."
@sanphaka04 You can take your pulse with a Geiger counter. As the pressure waves caused by your heart beat do molecular nuclear fusion. That is in the medical textbooks. Green plants in the light also give off gamma wave radiation. This time it is in the biology text books
co2 has an insulating property and has been steadily increasing alongside fossil fuel use. This is the primary driver of human induced climate change. I think this is the challenge needing to be addressed by policymakers.
So naturally, yet unethically and even illegally, oil companies will look to deny this through the chamber of commerce and oil's relationship to media - many owned by the same richest people. Be cautious about what you trust.
@tutorturtle The planet at large, is warming. NASA, the UN, climatologists, scientific research, academic centers, governments all agree. STILL, some uninformed or self motivated social opinion (as always) or statistical pilfering opposes the facts to no substantiated validity. You however bring no reason to your accusations of discredit. Do you work for an oil company? The primary cause of anthropological climate change is fossil fuel and its use. The second is methane from beef cattle.
@donsjuand What planet do you live on? Check your thermometer: record cold. Ironically coincidental with lessing solar activity. The gig is up. Progressive/Marxists have been trying to steal the Producers of this worlds income, by any lie at hand. Even to the point of bribing corrupting a few weak-minded researchers. I am a researcher for a major university, the history of societal manipulation is well documented with the last Global Cooling Scare of 1975. Go peddle your lies to the uneducated.
@tutorturtle So you oppose Marxism, ok. I couldn't care less about political division. My interests are in truth and cooperation in order to protect planet sustainability. This is based on values for truth, health, appreciation of life and love. The question is, do you understand and accept the costs associated with anthropological damage to our earth, whether it be co2 from fossil fuels, methane from beef, or erosion and deforestation? These are some of the effects encouraged by capitalism
@donsjuand Very few are willing to substantially alter their modern lifestyles to the degree required that will substantially alter the amount of energy we consume. With 8 Billion people to feed cloth house and educate, how do you propose to support this level of population without mass production of food, clothing housing, employment, education? While Socialism feeds off of society, capitalism is what provides for society. While I appreciate your idealism, you must face reality of human nature.
@tutorturtle I agree with you that social adaptation is a huge challenge and opportunity. In order to be sustainable, we must believe it is in our own interest to do so, and this is the area for much research. Take for example tax incentives encouraging green energy small business development and energy reduction rewards. Well, that costs money right? How about taxing polluters such as oil to fund this? When tobacco was taxed in Ontario, new funds became available for positive change. Laws.
@donsjuand I live and work in Boston, my colleges are the very Liberals that opposed Cape Wind. I have a camp in the Western mountains of Maine, the Liberals there also fought like banshees to oppose that wind project. It's not doubting Thomas like me you need to con, but your own kind. Taxing the current power producers, is a tax on you & me. Do you not understand how the world works? Solar & wind power will, at best, net 20% of current needs, WHEN the wind blows and the sun shines. Get real.
Nuclear power produces plutonium and death. Burning fossil fuels increases life on earth, but over the last 200 years has not increased there carbon dioxide in the air.
JonThm 8 months ago
@JonThm You're a moron.
Tradd20 4 months ago 3
Medics and nuclear engineers have told me about the gamma wave radiation emission from a beating heart. These people are PhD academics are working engineers. The heart gives off radiation, try a Geiger counter on your self: though your heart may have some years ago air.
JonThm 8 months ago
Google molecular nuclear fusion. Nature is powered by nuclear fusion on the hydrogen atoms in water.
JonThm 8 months ago
You can take your pulse with a Geiger counter. As the pressure waves caused by your heart beat do molecular nuclear fusion. That is in the medical textbooks. Green plants in the light also give off gamma wave radiation. This time it is in the biology text books
JonThm 8 months ago
Waterfalls, breaking waves, photosynthesis and animal blood systems give off nuclear radiation. Nuclear power adopted global warming as idea after Chernobyl 1986. QED
JonThm 8 months ago
Climate change is nuclear fiction
JonThm 8 months ago
There is nuclear fusion going on all around us
JonThm 8 months ago
@JonThm
You've made two unsupported statements ("there is nuclear fusion going on all around us", and "Climate change is nuclear fiction"). Both are nonsense. I'm guessing you pronounce it "New-Cue-Ler."
sanphaka04 8 months ago
@sanphaka04 You can take your pulse with a Geiger counter. As the pressure waves caused by your heart beat do molecular nuclear fusion. That is in the medical textbooks. Green plants in the light also give off gamma wave radiation. This time it is in the biology text books
JonThm 8 months ago
@JonThm
Sorry Jon, but you need some help. Best of wishes to you.
sanphaka04 8 months ago 3
co2 has an insulating property and has been steadily increasing alongside fossil fuel use. This is the primary driver of human induced climate change. I think this is the challenge needing to be addressed by policymakers.
donsjuand 10 months ago 2
So naturally, yet unethically and even illegally, oil companies will look to deny this through the chamber of commerce and oil's relationship to media - many owned by the same richest people. Be cautious about what you trust.
donsjuand 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And 95 percent of scientists have no truth, but you do?
donsjuand 10 months ago
Climate Change: Historically normal atmospheric cycles of a given planet, as a result of Solar activity.
Climate Justice: The armed robbery of productive citizens by fraudulently empowered Marxists.
tutorturtle 1 year ago
@tutorturtle The planet at large, is warming. NASA, the UN, climatologists, scientific research, academic centers, governments all agree. STILL, some uninformed or self motivated social opinion (as always) or statistical pilfering opposes the facts to no substantiated validity. You however bring no reason to your accusations of discredit. Do you work for an oil company? The primary cause of anthropological climate change is fossil fuel and its use. The second is methane from beef cattle.
donsjuand 10 months ago
@donsjuand What planet do you live on? Check your thermometer: record cold. Ironically coincidental with lessing solar activity. The gig is up. Progressive/Marxists have been trying to steal the Producers of this worlds income, by any lie at hand. Even to the point of bribing corrupting a few weak-minded researchers. I am a researcher for a major university, the history of societal manipulation is well documented with the last Global Cooling Scare of 1975. Go peddle your lies to the uneducated.
tutorturtle 10 months ago
@tutorturtle So you oppose Marxism, ok. I couldn't care less about political division. My interests are in truth and cooperation in order to protect planet sustainability. This is based on values for truth, health, appreciation of life and love. The question is, do you understand and accept the costs associated with anthropological damage to our earth, whether it be co2 from fossil fuels, methane from beef, or erosion and deforestation? These are some of the effects encouraged by capitalism
donsjuand 10 months ago
@donsjuand Very few are willing to substantially alter their modern lifestyles to the degree required that will substantially alter the amount of energy we consume. With 8 Billion people to feed cloth house and educate, how do you propose to support this level of population without mass production of food, clothing housing, employment, education? While Socialism feeds off of society, capitalism is what provides for society. While I appreciate your idealism, you must face reality of human nature.
tutorturtle 10 months ago
@tutorturtle I agree with you that social adaptation is a huge challenge and opportunity. In order to be sustainable, we must believe it is in our own interest to do so, and this is the area for much research. Take for example tax incentives encouraging green energy small business development and energy reduction rewards. Well, that costs money right? How about taxing polluters such as oil to fund this? When tobacco was taxed in Ontario, new funds became available for positive change. Laws.
donsjuand 10 months ago
@donsjuand I live and work in Boston, my colleges are the very Liberals that opposed Cape Wind. I have a camp in the Western mountains of Maine, the Liberals there also fought like banshees to oppose that wind project. It's not doubting Thomas like me you need to con, but your own kind. Taxing the current power producers, is a tax on you & me. Do you not understand how the world works? Solar & wind power will, at best, net 20% of current needs, WHEN the wind blows and the sun shines. Get real.
tutorturtle 10 months ago