The comment fits with my theory and accompanying evidence from investigators- that being - st johns abbey - a ring of occultists- possibly practicing some form of literal alchemy rituals
A comment from webslueths regarding the Jacob wetterling abduction
This sounds like a multi person job most sadly (mentioned by several of you above).
Complete and utter stupidity. First, this video in no way represents what happened. Jacobs body was never found. What you conveniently left out was the fact that DNA evidence identified the child in the Mississippi.
So essentially you insinuate a "connection" that doesn't exist... by taking some obscure passage with vague wording and apply it to a popular case of a missing child without addressing factual information in the Wetterling case itself. Please...don't stop taking your medication.
I'm not going to further validate your massive delusional mental retardation. I'm from Minnesota and have been my whole life. I'm familiar with both of these factual stories...and in the case of the "unidentified boy"...he was readily identified using DNA to do so. Now go back to dishonoring the dead, their stories and their families you massive fuck twit.
I am dissapointed you could not add to this debate by providing proof DNA was used to discount the boy in the river, as it leaves yet more unanswered questions in regards to the missing case of Jacob wetterling.
I am dissapointed you could not add to this debate by providing proof DNA was used to discount the boy in the river, as it leaves yet more unanswered questions in regards to the missing case of Jacob wetterling.
Again let me stress Jacob is not proven dead like you say, yet the evidence i present suggests sadly that may be the case.
You called him dead, i only presented evidence that suggests he may be , yet you chose to call him dead without any.
I am dissapointed you could not add to this debate by providing proof DNA was used to discount the boy in the river, as it leaves yet more unanswered questions in regards to the missing case of Jacob wetterling.
Again let me stress Jacob is not proven dead like you say, yet the evidence i present suggests sadly that may be the case.
You called him dead, i only presented evidence that suggests he may be , yet you chose to call him dead without any.
And thank you for walking straight into that you fucking moron. Your whole video is dedicated to a decapitated boy who you are asserting is Jacob Wetterling. However you quaintly assert "You called him dead, I only presented the evidence that suggest he may be" in an undoubted attempt to make yourself sound remotely rational and highlights the fact that you vastly unaware of the statistical data related to missing persons.....ESPECIALLY children.
Well, then be well aware of this asshat: Your theory states that a boy must must be killed by drowning in this ritual correct? Then riddle me this, why was the boy that was found decapitated? That would render your drowning theory of the "little king" meaningless to the ritual because he was decapitated BEFORE he hit the water.
And it is obvious Jacob is distinct from the rest of the smiley face victims yet connected i believe as a intitial genesis of the crimes- this is just a logical asumption based upon the facts of the alchemy and the various connections to jacob and sfk killings
It is speculative granted, but makes sense for it forms a cohesive argument based upon real provable connections.
As you can see, WATER and all other elements such as the removal of hands feet and head is included in the Zozimus ritual text - AS is EMBALMING AS KEY TO THE RITUAL .
ALSO IN THE ALCHEMY chemical symbols list where Jacobs name is spelt out in the symbol CALX
Then riddle me this, why was the boy that was found decapitated? That would render your drowning theory of the "little king" meaningless to the ritual because he was decapitated BEFORE he hit the water. NOT SO
The order of the events is a question of what the ritual requires, and as for it contradicting the
"Little King Must die " quote it doesn't in the least, FOR IT STATES
I think it would be useful to point out, that victim advocate groups and concerned MN citizens also have presented fully documented articles, showing Jacob Wetterlings abdiction possibly being linked to the goings on at st johns abbey.
I am afraid your irational emotional angry slander is not sufficient to quiet the voices of those whos interest is coming to a truth and justice for jacob and many others.
Myself and others have been trying to connect the dots for the past seven years as to how. I've always believed the abbey was in the mix -- was there a secret group of deviants working there, who are now slowly being outed. The big challenge is connecting them -- which is nearly impossible to do since not a one has ever told the truth.
The foot they compared Jacobs footprint with was severed and water damaged, that ontop of the FBI'S own research of Baby footprints being unreliable in general, only compounds the case for such an idenitfication being reliable enough to ruling out the boy being jacobas totaly negligable, incompetenet , irresponsible and factually unsafe and untrue.
I have qouted Fbi specialist who warn baby footrpints are unsafe
I have quoted the actual news stories concerning the boy in the river and the fact that the investogators said they are looking for someone who has been doing rituals by the river-
i have indeed linked these things to my other research , which itself is not based upon speculation but other documented facts.
Yes...because clearly I was talking about footprints. I was talking about the extent ignorance will go to validate itself without doing any actual work. (You)
Again if you are bothered by what my research proposes, this aspect of it in relation to JACOB AND THE BOY IN THE RIVER, can be easily refuted if you provide some evidence of what you say is the case.
I am dissapointed you could not add to this debate by providing proof DNA was used to discount the boy in the river, as it leaves yet more unanswered questions in regards to the missing case of Jacob wetterling.
if you want to prove your argument reliable please back it up in like manner to me with documented references, rather than purely relying upon prejudicaial bias such as inference to mental health status, which as no bearing upon the reliability of the facts i have presented.
I don't have to validate a fable that you picked up and nonchalantly applied to a real case. Your "documented references" as you would call them are laughable. When you make an assertion in the realm of the grown ups...it is up to you to present the evidence for your claim. It is not my logical responsibility to prove your theory either way. Just because you provide a ridiculous tautology doesn't prove you make any sense in the real world crime solving ontology.
It is up to those who in the spirit of what is true, to decide wether or not they believe hearsay as you present or documented factual reports such as i have presented.
I am afraid in the grown up world youdo have to validate as factual your statements.
If it were really the case that DNA evidence discounted the boy in the river, you could easily show this to be true.
As it is, anyone reading this to and fro between yourself and i, will plainly see you are just making claims that are not validated by a testable source, whereass my claims can be sourced by anyone in regard to the FBI research and how it relates to the footrpint evidence.
i heard of some weird cult called Wicca that allegedly performs a human sacrifice once in a whil anonymously. i also read it uses gay sex as part of their rituals. do the Police know this ?
The three pointed crown is the symbol "REGULUS 'in alchemy, it signifies THE LITTLE KING,who must be killed,usually by drowning. The little king also symbolizes MAN, as does the the symbol for Mars, as you rightly pointed out, that symbol like the regulus symbol is part of the alchemical list of symbols.
The T cross is a pre christian version of a cross and is also mentioned and well known in alchemy.
Here is my updated research on the Joshua Guimond case
Connecting his disspearence to a catholic saints day
godlikeproductions
com/forum1/message1445735/pg1
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
Here is my updated research on the smiley face murders in general
just add and h t t p : .//
godlikeproductions com
/forum1/message1444656/pg1
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
The comment fits with my theory and accompanying evidence from investigators- that being - st johns abbey - a ring of occultists- possibly practicing some form of literal alchemy rituals
A comment from webslueths regarding the Jacob wetterling abduction
This sounds like a multi person job most sadly (mentioned by several of you above).
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
Complete and utter stupidity. First, this video in no way represents what happened. Jacobs body was never found. What you conveniently left out was the fact that DNA evidence identified the child in the Mississippi.
So essentially you insinuate a "connection" that doesn't exist... by taking some obscure passage with vague wording and apply it to a popular case of a missing child without addressing factual information in the Wetterling case itself. Please...don't stop taking your medication.
Sn4pDr4gon 1 year ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
Where is the evidence that the child was not Jacob?
Do you have a link stating this has been proven?
If you do please post it here.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@THEhoundedFEW
I'm not going to further validate your massive delusional mental retardation. I'm from Minnesota and have been my whole life. I'm familiar with both of these factual stories...and in the case of the "unidentified boy"...he was readily identified using DNA to do so. Now go back to dishonoring the dead, their stories and their families you massive fuck twit.
Sn4pDr4gon 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
I am dissapointed you could not add to this debate by providing proof DNA was used to discount the boy in the river, as it leaves yet more unanswered questions in regards to the missing case of Jacob wetterling.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
I am dissapointed you could not add to this debate by providing proof DNA was used to discount the boy in the river, as it leaves yet more unanswered questions in regards to the missing case of Jacob wetterling.
Again let me stress Jacob is not proven dead like you say, yet the evidence i present suggests sadly that may be the case.
You called him dead, i only presented evidence that suggests he may be , yet you chose to call him dead without any.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
@Sn4pDr4gon
I am dissapointed you could not add to this debate by providing proof DNA was used to discount the boy in the river, as it leaves yet more unanswered questions in regards to the missing case of Jacob wetterling.
Again let me stress Jacob is not proven dead like you say, yet the evidence i present suggests sadly that may be the case.
You called him dead, i only presented evidence that suggests he may be , yet you chose to call him dead without any.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@THEhoundedFEW
And thank you for walking straight into that you fucking moron. Your whole video is dedicated to a decapitated boy who you are asserting is Jacob Wetterling. However you quaintly assert "You called him dead, I only presented the evidence that suggest he may be" in an undoubted attempt to make yourself sound remotely rational and highlights the fact that you vastly unaware of the statistical data related to missing persons.....ESPECIALLY children.
Sn4pDr4gon 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
I am well aware of such statistics Yet
Hope is a neccesary source of strength in missing cases
and above ALL TRUTH. which you clearly have a complete disregard for.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@THEhoundedFEW
Well, then be well aware of this asshat: Your theory states that a boy must must be killed by drowning in this ritual correct? Then riddle me this, why was the boy that was found decapitated? That would render your drowning theory of the "little king" meaningless to the ritual because he was decapitated BEFORE he hit the water.
Sn4pDr4gon 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
There are other elemets depicted within alchemy that match the decapitation and removal of hands and feet as i have shown.
The particular alchemical ritual that i showed connected to the boy in the river is taken from the Zozimus text.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
And it is obvious Jacob is distinct from the rest of the smiley face victims yet connected i believe as a intitial genesis of the crimes- this is just a logical asumption based upon the facts of the alchemy and the various connections to jacob and sfk killings
It is speculative granted, but makes sense for it forms a cohesive argument based upon real provable connections.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
This is not reasonable conclusion.
As i have shown the zozimus text involves decapitation removal of arms and legs AND EMBALMING and Bodies being in WATER.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
@Sn4pDr4gon
This is not reasonable conclusion.
As i have shown the zozimus text involves decapitation removal of arms and legs AND EMBALMING and Bodies being in WATER.
The order of the events is a question of what the ritual requires, and as for it contradicting the
"Little King Must die " quote it doesn't in the least, FOR IT STATES
USUALLY BY DROWNING
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
As you can see, WATER and all other elements such as the removal of hands feet and head is included in the Zozimus ritual text - AS is EMBALMING AS KEY TO THE RITUAL .
ALSO IN THE ALCHEMY chemical symbols list where Jacobs name is spelt out in the symbol CALX
IT REFERS TO water next to his name .
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
Then riddle me this, why was the boy that was found decapitated? That would render your drowning theory of the "little king" meaningless to the ritual because he was decapitated BEFORE he hit the water. NOT SO
The order of the events is a question of what the ritual requires, and as for it contradicting the
"Little King Must die " quote it doesn't in the least, FOR IT STATES
USUALLY BY DROWNING
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
You are not sounding remotely rational and present no reliable source for your angry claims
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
I think it would be useful to point out, that victim advocate groups and concerned MN citizens also have presented fully documented articles, showing Jacob Wetterlings abdiction possibly being linked to the goings on at st johns abbey.
I am afraid your irational emotional angry slander is not sufficient to quiet the voices of those whos interest is coming to a truth and justice for jacob and many others.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@THEhoundedFEW
Myself and others have been trying to connect the dots for the past seven years as to how. I've always believed the abbey was in the mix -- was there a secret group of deviants working there, who are now slowly being outed. The big challenge is connecting them -- which is nearly impossible to do since not a one has ever told the truth.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
As you have seen the F.B.I made it clear that baby footprint evidence is considered unreliable as identification.
This as far as i have been able to research , was the ONLY SUPPORT of the claim of the child not being Jacob.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
The foot they compared Jacobs footprint with was severed and water damaged, that ontop of the FBI'S own research of Baby footprints being unreliable in general, only compounds the case for such an idenitfication being reliable enough to ruling out the boy being jacobas totaly negligable, incompetenet , irresponsible and factually unsafe and untrue.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
I Have seen no articles either claiming or showing actual proof of any kind based upon any other evidence that the child in the river was not JACOB.
Please provide credible information that state contrary to this as it is important.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
DNA evidence identified the child in the Mississippi
Obviously you have seen this information youself as you claim it to be factual.
Please be good enough to post a link where this D.N.A evidence has been claimed to rule out the boy being Jacob.
Your case will then be shown to be factually correct.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
I have qouted Fbi specialist who warn baby footrpints are unsafe
I have quoted the actual news stories concerning the boy in the river and the fact that the investogators said they are looking for someone who has been doing rituals by the river-
i have indeed linked these things to my other research , which itself is not based upon speculation but other documented facts.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@THEhoundedFEW
Yes...because clearly I was talking about footprints. I was talking about the extent ignorance will go to validate itself without doing any actual work. (You)
Sn4pDr4gon 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
you reply is out of context with any question i posed.
Are you stating that DNA was retrived from the boys foot?
Where was this reported?
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
Again if you are bothered by what my research proposes, this aspect of it in relation to JACOB AND THE BOY IN THE RIVER, can be easily refuted if you provide some evidence of what you say is the case.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
I have to repeat for the sake of other readers
I am dissapointed you could not add to this debate by providing proof DNA was used to discount the boy in the river, as it leaves yet more unanswered questions in regards to the missing case of Jacob wetterling.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
if you want to prove your argument reliable please back it up in like manner to me with documented references, rather than purely relying upon prejudicaial bias such as inference to mental health status, which as no bearing upon the reliability of the facts i have presented.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@THEhoundedFEW
I don't have to validate a fable that you picked up and nonchalantly applied to a real case. Your "documented references" as you would call them are laughable. When you make an assertion in the realm of the grown ups...it is up to you to present the evidence for your claim. It is not my logical responsibility to prove your theory either way. Just because you provide a ridiculous tautology doesn't prove you make any sense in the real world crime solving ontology.
Sn4pDr4gon 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
It is up to those who in the spirit of what is true, to decide wether or not they believe hearsay as you present or documented factual reports such as i have presented.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
I am afraid in the grown up world youdo have to validate as factual your statements.
If it were really the case that DNA evidence discounted the boy in the river, you could easily show this to be true.
As it is, anyone reading this to and fro between yourself and i, will plainly see you are just making claims that are not validated by a testable source, whereass my claims can be sourced by anyone in regard to the FBI research and how it relates to the footrpint evidence.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
I have recieved your private message which resorts to futher name calling and is without any further evidence to back up your argument.
Just as i thought, you do not have anything to offer only vitriol and nastiness. Please defer from making claims you cannot backup.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
I have recieved your private message which resorts to futher name calling and is without any further evidence to back up your argument.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
@Sn4pDr4gon
I have recieved you private message
Just as i thought, you do not have anything to offer only vitriol and nastiness. Please defer from making claims you cannot backup.
It is important for the sake of the memory of the missing not to dishonour them with nonsense.
My resarch is documented your claims are not.
THEhoundedFEW 11 months ago
i heard of some weird cult called Wicca that allegedly performs a human sacrifice once in a whil anonymously. i also read it uses gay sex as part of their rituals. do the Police know this ?
Roadracer987654321 1 year ago
@BoyintheMachine
i am saying it is possible someone is using a llteral playing out of the alchemy and using at as ritual involving murder.
THEhoundedFEW 2 years ago
The TAU cross is indeed pagan, used in both alchemy and masonry.
THEhoundedFEW 2 years ago
The three pointed crown is the symbol "REGULUS 'in alchemy, it signifies THE LITTLE KING,who must be killed,usually by drowning. The little king also symbolizes MAN, as does the the symbol for Mars, as you rightly pointed out, that symbol like the regulus symbol is part of the alchemical list of symbols.
The T cross is a pre christian version of a cross and is also mentioned and well known in alchemy.
THEhoundedFEW 2 years ago