Added: 4 years ago
From: xbirdiebirdiex
Views: 63,491
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (39)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOL! THIS MACHINE IS SO FUCKING CLOSE IT'S INSANE!

    By Christmas I'm gonna patent mine... I've done it. :P

    Waiting for the hate comments...

    Hating

    Anger

    Towards

    Everyone

    Reaching

    Success

  • @Color12Productions Are you being serious here or just trolling? I really can't tell. This design (and millions more) have been tried for over a century. even if we ignore that... absolutely everything mankind has learned about physics in the last 10,000 years shows us that overunity is impossible. In order for you to have success everything humanity has learned about physics would have to be wrong. Which would leave me to wonder how we have accurately planned the trajectory of space flights...

  • @MrAwsome514 Nothing overunity about this kind of engine. in normal stat a magnet is neutral in its fieldlines. If you could deflect one pole of it, you could harvest the other.

    in case of magnets its power is not endless, but it comes close.

    As you speak about 10,000 years of physics, "we"know that magnets have a certain power, we can see, experience and measure the effects, but "we" don't know how, or why they work.

    I see the potential in this kind of devices.

    Best Regards

  • @ericmieremet You seriously under estimate our current understanding of magnetic physics. First of all magnetic fields are toridal in shape. Their fields must loop around from the positive to the negative. Turning a pole off like what you seem to sugest is impossible. Furthermore magnetic fields are not a form of energy. They are a force.

  • @ericmieremet "We" do. You don't. Learn some physics and all the stupid questions will be gone. These kind of devices are a scam invented for ripping off the gullible people who lack knowledge in this sphere.

  • Why do people keep looking for perpetual machines in magnets? Magnetism is OLD NEWS. For once, please show me something with radiation focusing lenses or osmosis.

    Magnets are so mainstream and the arguments against their use in perpetual motion are widely known.

    Yes, I am a perpetual-machine-sceptic hipster.

  • That's it there you have it! Now make a bigger model much stronger magnets and replace a wind energy motor (those big fan things) with that propultion and thats it

  • ___ w w w diymagneticmotor com for FREE energy should be intersting there..

  • Comment removed

  • WATCH "TESLA ZERO ENERGY POINT"

  • THERE HAS BEEN MANY INVENTIONS BEFORE THIS OF FREE ENERGY AND THEY CERTAINLY WORKED BUT D ONES ABOVE D LAW PROHIBIT US FROM SEEING IT

  • @slobodanzjalic of course...

  • -cont... you dont have a video of it, hmmmm gee i hear that a lot, ppl that have 1000's of videos yet no time to make one of that, or ppl that never post a video claiming that, come on now, you guys down religion because of belief of something non-physical, yet you want others to believe in something that is physical, yet no proof of it, ummm yeah NO, show proof. any finaly a question why call these things motors? when they dont "motor" why not call them what they are? manget wheel brake thingy

  • its funny how a video showing how it does not work you have all these ppl claiming that it does work, infact seen tons of videos where they dont work and yet ppl alwasy claim they do, yet i have never seen one video of one working, yet some how these ppl say like @masonwolfhound "i have one running at home, but will make a video when i have a generator hooked up to it" will if it runs with or with out anything hooked up to it then you created the greatest thing in the world, yet you dont have a.

  • LOOKS LIKE IT DOESN'T WORK

  • The Laws of Physics are ink in paper based on best guesses by scientists. And most of us don't even know that the stars we see at night are images millions of years old. Heck, we just discovered dark matter which is responsible for holding the galaxies together in a spiral, otherwise it just fall apart from centrifugal motion. Oh wait, I guess our galaxy is gunna stop and kill us all cause it can't volate a puny human guessed law.

  • HAS ANYONE HEARD ABOUT CONSERVATION OF ENERGY?

  • @guillermuss yes the the motor is turned-over by a small electric motor that uses less energy than a small alternator but the whole thing run several alternators (the original concept was created to optimize the mechanical energy that is created by an electric motor)

  • Search for Free Energy - nope, it wasn't there.

  • where do you get the wheels... do you make them? the magnets are geomag right?

  • energy has to be created naturally somehow. Look at the universe, full of energy. and it got here somehow. now figure it out, energy that is running the universe is or has come from somewhere. and do not give me some god done it B.

  • Doesn't work because violates one of the thermodinamic laws.

    All the devices that try to take advantage of an "hole" of gravity are designed as "unbalanced wheels".

    They are studied since the 11th century and none worked till today.

  • @pratinus - It never works. Stop making nonsense claims.

  • law of conservation of matter

    you cant create energy with that

  • There is no way that any such machine can ever produce energy.

    You just have an arrangement of magnetic poles on the rotor and stator. Magnetic poles moving past each other can never produce energy because the energy change as the poles move towards each other is exactly canceled when they move apart.

  • .........I can continue the length of the unit which is currently 340mm long to any application that is reqired. I dont see the need for a gate in the configuration Ive got as it runs smooth. The torque I am getting from this device at this small scale is 8nM maximum with 6nM at a constant. I havent attached any weighted flywheel to the shaft as yet though im sure i will get more torque when i do so. I will be posting a video shortly of this device once Ive complete attaching a generator.

  • The 12 magnet configuration (drive) continues inline and is not offset which I have made as a casing split into 2 outer shoes. The load sequence order runs as follows per force applied (1) 0 degree (2) 133.2 degree (3) 66.6 degree (4) 333.0 degree (5) 266.4 degree (6) 199.8 degree all simaltaneously over the 6 (flywheels) at every 15 degree of rotaion movement. I can continue the length of the unit which is currently 340mm long. (continue comment next post)

  • You are on the right track! I have a very similar prototype working at home. My configuration has 9 internal magnets set at 40 degree apart for the inside (flywheel) 12 external magnets set at 30degree apart for the (drive) with sheilding on both. I have the (flywheel) ganged in series along the central shaft offset 66.6 degree to the following configuration which has a total of 6 (flywheels). This configuration I have made works. (continue comment next post)

  • Why have you NOT posted a vid of your work.?

  • why does it stop as well?

  • what angles are the outside magnets placed on?

  • excuse me, i was wondering as to what angles the outside magnets were placed on?

  • you should try putting it on an angle and add some weigth on the oposite side that it stops

  • yup, the gate slows it down

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more