Russian junk "warship" on fire in the Pacific ocean

[EmperorofTerra]

Please Russia, don't insult us again and name the next so called "warship" of yours "Tbilisi as you did with the Kutznezov. It's severely damaging the image of our capital.

[cbarsonfire]

We have better sea worthy ships sitting in out moth ball and resveve fleets. The Russian navy is a joke.

[grooveclubhouse]

@Legacyleg3nd Really? Thats something they never talked about. They made it seem that the carriers were impervious to attack. Any way I could get some more info on that?

[BertrumPantyshield]

Wow that guy must be in charge, look at the size of that hat!

[ractyarc25]

hahahahahaha....RUSSIA SUCKs......POOR Bastards

[eee545]

more russian junk

fuck russians

[Abanamat85]

At least Russia HAS a warship, compared to Georgia. lol

[NWguy83]

$1000 says Russia doesnt build any new aircraft carriers for the next 10 years.

[PlayF00tball]

This isn't 1942. Russia's been selling their carriers to anyone stupid & wasteful enough to buy them. Aircraft carriers are absolutely useless, pure psychological warfare. They are the most vulnerable targets in war, unless you're fighting Lebanon but guess what, modern jets can fly long distance, but they don't even need to do that with all the bases the US has in (180?) countries. That junk is doing nothing but contributing to plastic oceans and the military-industrial complex.

[Mojo1982]

@PlayF00tball

True.

[Mr2505federal]

@PlayF00tball No I have to disagree with you that aircraft carriers are useless, because they bring alot more to the fight including extending time on target! And you can park them off any coast if the US planes would have to do air refuels from bases it also extends the time the crews are in the air! US tried that concept when reagan attacked Libya back in the 80's using f-111's from UK the flight was extended by 12 hours. Besides the United States does not have 180 over seas bases.

[battlefieldguy2000]

@PlayF00tball Aircraft Carriers project incredible air power over a wide area. It is foolish to say they are useless. If the US wanted to, it could raze Gadhafi's Libya with the combined air power of just a handful of carriers. You can't get within 200 miles of a carrier group without being dead or authorized.

[docrw]

@PlayF00tball Well said. Russia is just wasting more steel.

[LashaDolidze]

Fuck russia

[fatal9er]

Damn that's a big hat.

[haranghy]

No1 against bird shit

[realwarbeast]

omg-- Americans should look at their warships, and think about it safety

"Forrestal" "Kitty Hawk " "George Washington"

[SoloWing808]

Do you know how many U.S. warships have caught fire or run aground? Too many to count so stop using this one event to discredit the entire Russian Navy.

[vladislav1romanovich]

americans so stupid!but think that they the smartest people in the world!american education sucks!70% of amrecan population to fat to pick up ther asses!so shut a fuck up!

[euro106]

haha russia sucks

[bombarderoazul]

You americans are so stupid, accidents on ships aren't rare. What about when there was an explosion on an american iowa class battleship turret in the 80's over one hundred sailors were killed, there have been accidents on american carriers and warships with many sailors killed. Do your research.

[snakestomper]

Yes,That is true but it is historical fact that russian navy has crappy DC(Damage Control) I was a marine and was throughly trained in DC(We marines spend alot of time on navy ships)

[stevdsvegas]

This is the scariest thing that can happen to a sailor. Fires on ships are no joke. That said, I agree with you luis.

[LuisDingley]

hahahah pathetic Russians