The 350hp "Thunderbird special " Was avaialble but was very, very, rare. Standard engine would of been a Y block in 1960 i believe, The 390 was prolly the best overall performer.
Be Still My Heart! That is one of the COOOOLEST cars I have EVER seen. Cousin to the Falcon and the Galaxie, this Better Idea will soar into the hearts of all.
The biggest problem with the retro bird was the engine was too weak to justify the cost of the car. If they would have put in a 5.4 liter 300hp engine in it then it would have been worth the price that they were selling it for.
i think i really pounded out 350 hp, but man you coulnt stop it too quickly. today with CELL PHONE ITITS need more distance or better yet as shown here MORE SHEET METAL
@OsbornTramain That was with the 430 Liincoln engine ( J code I believe ). Not too many were made with it. Most had a 300 hp 352 and some had a 235 hp 2bbl 352. I think the figures were inflated. There really isn't much difference in the 300 hp 352 in '58/ '60 and the 250hp 352 in '64/'66.
well back in the 90's im thinking 91-97 ford did put the 4.6L and 5.0L V-8 in the bird...to me the less HP engine would be the Base model the 3.8L V-6 without the supercharger..
what ever does the most work requires the most mantinance,, if you add indipendant rear like ford did on the explorer all you did was add complexcity to a simple RUGGED design.. me ill take that FE block anyday and the IRON CASE cruse o matic , and please tell me that the ford 31 spline or the 28 spline 9 " rear was more dependible than any gm peice at the time after all they dont run toyota rear ends in nascar today. fFord has enough sport coops . no money out there. ill nod to
This car is leaning over on its sides going just 10 mph!
JET997u 9 months ago
The 350hp "Thunderbird special " Was avaialble but was very, very, rare. Standard engine would of been a Y block in 1960 i believe, The 390 was prolly the best overall performer.
countryboy77351 1 year ago
Sorry I kinda missed what car where whe talking about here ????
Gaabiiito 1 year ago
Nice house.
BettyVanSneeIV 1 year ago
Be Still My Heart! That is one of the COOOOLEST cars I have EVER seen. Cousin to the Falcon and the Galaxie, this Better Idea will soar into the hearts of all.
I sure do love a classic Thunderbird!
BeatleBangs1964 1 year ago
Massive skyroof!
PawlieGR 2 years ago
Were parts of this commercial filmed on the MGM studio lot? The Loews movie theatre seem to be in indicator.
Drivermatic 2 years ago
i think so they my have cut down main drag to ocean side ?
silverbird58 1 year ago
amore.
dale1966gto 2 years ago
Pretty sweet - you can see the designers were inspired by cars that were lowered. They always look better low.....
Nessfiles 2 years ago
The biggest problem with the retro bird was the engine was too weak to justify the cost of the car. If they would have put in a 5.4 liter 300hp engine in it then it would have been worth the price that they were selling it for.
SteelCity1981 2 years ago
If the retro bird could nock down 110 miles per gallon ,like tom ogles 390 cid 1970 galaxie , i could forgive the minor hp losses..
silverbird58 2 years ago
the claim in this commercial that the horse power was 350hp? Was that inflated and inacurate?
OsbornTramain 2 years ago
i think i really pounded out 350 hp, but man you coulnt stop it too quickly. today with CELL PHONE ITITS need more distance or better yet as shown here MORE SHEET METAL
silverbird58 1 year ago
@OsbornTramain That was with the 430 Liincoln engine ( J code I believe ). Not too many were made with it. Most had a 300 hp 352 and some had a 235 hp 2bbl 352. I think the figures were inflated. There really isn't much difference in the 300 hp 352 in '58/ '60 and the 250hp 352 in '64/'66.
roadstarman58 1 year ago
na the newest bird was good quiet car what killed it was dealer mark up 42k was too much for high volume segment of its marker share
silverbird58 2 years ago
It's odd how the "new" Thunderbirds were flops. Actually, the reason I have read is that they were made of cheapy materials.
bloggerdude2005 2 years ago
They were flops because they looked kinda bad, the engine was weak. Basically, Ford was pretty weak at the time, the styling was not very well done.
Essentially, Ford couldn't spend that much money, and paid the price.
However, I think if they relaunched the Thunderbird as a sporty coupe, something priced higher than a Mustang, it would sell very well.
My rec would be to sell it in three carriages:
4.0L V6
4.6L/5.0L V8
6.2L V8
Give it some IRS, make it a real sports car, unlike the Mustang.
beepandbop 2 years ago
well back in the 90's im thinking 91-97 ford did put the 4.6L and 5.0L V-8 in the bird...to me the less HP engine would be the Base model the 3.8L V-6 without the supercharger..
wofobo 2 years ago
what ever does the most work requires the most mantinance,, if you add indipendant rear like ford did on the explorer all you did was add complexcity to a simple RUGGED design.. me ill take that FE block anyday and the IRON CASE cruse o matic , and please tell me that the ford 31 spline or the 28 spline 9 " rear was more dependible than any gm peice at the time after all they dont run toyota rear ends in nascar today. fFord has enough sport coops . no money out there. ill nod to
bird
silverbird58 1 year ago
I lhave a lincoln ls with the same drivetrain as the new thunderbirds and it's a damn good engine and tranny.
1969MustangMACH1 2 years ago
wronk the bird was too much for that 30k dollar car me i liked it ..
silverbird58 1 year ago
the 60 tv ad was great too, the great dane
leaning with turns then sticking head throu sunroof was hilarious.
silverbird58 3 years ago
i wish some day was today i love these old birds!
BRENTHENRY1989 3 years ago
I own a 1960 Thunderbird and this commercial has made my day! Perhaps if they could smell the interior 50 years later they might leave the Tux home!
trackpak 3 years ago
Cool Jazz, Adults in formal attire and breathtaking landscapes architecture, man I love this ad!
Drivermatic 3 years ago
This is the best Thunderbird commercial I've ever seen. Aren't those the same gates the Edsel drove out of in their first commercial?
64098 3 years ago
very cool video...love that ride.
JoeyJr702 3 years ago
350 horses for 1960!? thats amazing you dont even get that in today's mustang gt lol
TtoDaMoney 3 years ago
That is a rare commerical. Thanks for posting it. Now if only my '60 Bird had that sunroof...
tbird430 3 years ago
god work with the commercial.... i want to buy one, seriously
Jaimico4ever 3 years ago
I want to say that's "ken nordines voice " his signature song was called "my baby"
silverbird58 3 years ago
1960 was the final year for the "square" bird and for the front tilting hood. The "square" bird reappeared in 1980 and lasted until 1982.
frankd1965 3 years ago
Very interesting! It was amazing how the early 50's and 60's commercials always showed people in Formal Attire!
belikow 3 years ago
Great old commercial. I have a 2-tone blue bird. Mine doesn't have the moon roof though!
brandonheidrick 4 years ago 2