Let's pursue and apply the "science" of the "official" account.
Since all three of the WTCs were not controlled demolitions according to NIST then it must already make sense for engineers within controlled demolition companies to consider cost cutting measures, correct?
No more weeks and weeks of planning setting charges. They can use inexpensive jet fuel and add office refuse from a landfill to avoid costly high explosives.
There - let's start saving some big tax money for demolitions!
You mean that a lowly high school physics teacher had the courage to actually tell the truth? Strange that NIST can't prove this guy wrong. NIST will not submit it's reports and data for peer review therefore anything they say can't be trusted. 911 was an inside job and if NIST would submit it's reports and data for peer review it will be proven beyond all scientific doubt.
Never give up. Science and reason will prevail. Faith in the laws of physics are the only thing that will save us from lies and deception. If the building "fell" down, most of it should have been intact. Mr. Chandler's explanation is damning straight forward physics which is what he teaches in high school that something is wrong with the government's explanation of how buildings 1, 2 and 7 fell.
@Daddyo930 Science and reason have ALREADY prevailed and dictate collapse vs CD. As there was and is NO CD behavior that gets the bldgs to move AT ALL.
NO SEISMIC data to back up CD either, NONE!
NO ONE has shown it! NO ONE, including D chandler!
YOu and DOPES like you dont get it.
And you NEVER will!
Proof positive that science and reason have already won!!
@LHOdidntdoit Apply the "science" of the "official" account.
ALL three of the WTCs were NOT controlled demolitions according to NIST then it must already make sense to you and other such engineers within controlled demolition companies to consider cost cutting measures, correct?
No more weeks and weeks of planning setting charges. They can use inexpensive jet fuel and add office refuse from a landfill to avoid costly high explosives.
@MrIHADANACCOUNT One more thing, 7 was it multiple times by a 1360 ft tall tower ripping it 100 new assholes. See voluminous FDNY attesting to that. See wtc7liesgooglepages, they have a spread sheet for same.
Planes are not the only thing that cause fatal load altering damage.
As I was clearly referring to the Towers when I cited your lack of mentioning the planes, not 7 shit wit!
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?
This guy has NO CLUE what he is talking about!!! Those "Squibs" are nothing but air being compressed from the upper floors and being ejected out the side. This is something that is expected and nothing out of the ordinary. Had that been a linear shaped charge it would have blown the corner of the building off. And interesting to note that both towers displayed NO audio of charges going off PRIOR to collapse. Listen to Kevin Cosgrove audio and ABC news parked at the base of the tower
Let's pursue and apply the "science" of the "official" account.
Since all three of the WTCs were not controlled demolitions according to NIST then it must already make sense for engineers within controlled demolition companies to consider cost cutting measures, correct?
No more weeks and weeks of planning setting charges. They can use inexpensive jet fuel and add office refuse from a landfill to avoid costly high explosives.
There - let's start saving some big tax money for demolitions!
MrIHADANACCOUNT 6 months ago
You mean that a lowly high school physics teacher had the courage to actually tell the truth? Strange that NIST can't prove this guy wrong. NIST will not submit it's reports and data for peer review therefore anything they say can't be trusted. 911 was an inside job and if NIST would submit it's reports and data for peer review it will be proven beyond all scientific doubt.
Daddyo930 8 months ago 2
Never give up. Science and reason will prevail. Faith in the laws of physics are the only thing that will save us from lies and deception. If the building "fell" down, most of it should have been intact. Mr. Chandler's explanation is damning straight forward physics which is what he teaches in high school that something is wrong with the government's explanation of how buildings 1, 2 and 7 fell.
Daddyo930 8 months ago
@Daddyo930 Science and reason have ALREADY prevailed and dictate collapse vs CD. As there was and is NO CD behavior that gets the bldgs to move AT ALL.
NO SEISMIC data to back up CD either, NONE!
NO ONE has shown it! NO ONE, including D chandler!
YOu and DOPES like you dont get it.
And you NEVER will!
Proof positive that science and reason have already won!!
LMFAO at YOU!
LHOdidntdoit 8 months ago
@LHOdidntdoit Apply the "science" of the "official" account.
ALL three of the WTCs were NOT controlled demolitions according to NIST then it must already make sense to you and other such engineers within controlled demolition companies to consider cost cutting measures, correct?
No more weeks and weeks of planning setting charges. They can use inexpensive jet fuel and add office refuse from a landfill to avoid costly high explosives.
Start saving some big money on demolitions!
Right?
MrIHADANACCOUNT 6 months ago
@MrIHADANACCOUNT See the very thorough papers by MIT and Northwestern Univ.
Read just the synopsizes upfront, its all in there.
Added to which, the way you couch what brought the towers down is utterly ignorant.
Not even mentioning the planes and the fatal load altering damage they caused form their extremely violent impacts.
SO Typical of the mighty Truther!
Fuck off nitwit!
LHOdidntdoit 6 months ago
Comment removed
MrIHADANACCOUNT 6 months ago
@MrIHADANACCOUNT NIST put out an entire report on 7, guess you missed it.
Apparently youre unaware of the MIT and Northwestern Univ pieces on the Towers.
Your ignorance is not my problem.
By the way I insult EVERYONE who actually buys the CD BS.
Know why?
Youre utterly DUMB, thats why.
Also I embrace logic, logic that dictates that rigging these bldgs w/o detection was impossible.
Also there was simply no NEED to rig the bldgs. No theory, just FACT.
But logic escapes Truthers COMPLETELY.
LHOdidntdoit 6 months ago
@MrIHADANACCOUNT One more thing, 7 was it multiple times by a 1360 ft tall tower ripping it 100 new assholes. See voluminous FDNY attesting to that. See wtc7liesgooglepages, they have a spread sheet for same.
Planes are not the only thing that cause fatal load altering damage.
As I was clearly referring to the Towers when I cited your lack of mentioning the planes, not 7 shit wit!
LHOdidntdoit 6 months ago
He has a beard! He must know what he's talking about. LOL
flanksteak2 8 months ago
Thank you for being an educated and a courageous person, an rare combination. See " youtube "WTC North Tower Exploding".
henningvontreskow 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?
ctcole77 8 months ago
This guy has NO CLUE what he is talking about!!! Those "Squibs" are nothing but air being compressed from the upper floors and being ejected out the side. This is something that is expected and nothing out of the ordinary. Had that been a linear shaped charge it would have blown the corner of the building off. And interesting to note that both towers displayed NO audio of charges going off PRIOR to collapse. Listen to Kevin Cosgrove audio and ABC news parked at the base of the tower
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles
Your NWO will fail.
Anothercoilgun 1 year ago
Look at those HUGE squibs!!!
arcanekrusader 2 years ago
@arcanekrusader this foo was my teacher
slashBdelivers 1 year ago
@slashBdelivers He is an idiot and i can prove he is!!! I am nothing short of STUNNED this guy is an educated man!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago