My inspiration for writting my comments came from the lord.And not from what everybody else thinks.I have seen parts of hell in vision it is terrifing beyond belief.What the lord has said about hell is true. In hell are whole church congrations and there preachers. Why ! because they were never told the entire truth. Even the muched loved pope john paul is in hell ! he wants to repent but the lord said to him it is tolate. SO WAKE UP PEOPLE.
so glad you woke up watch the vid responce i just sent you it might shock you even more also again gail riplinger new age bible versions and the gays the 2 top commity members 1 was a gay man and the other a gay woman gail riplingers video will shock you to death and you will see why the church is the way it is now google niv perversion god bless
new age bible versions gail riplinger its on my channel the entire word fasting is omitted further internet search niv perversion you will get it all there
King james was a tyrant with his own ambitions and changed wording ! plus left out important books of the bible just to satisfy himself and his own beliefs at the time. But please dont get me wrong the word of god is true in there. But it is not all there and some is not interpreted correctly. How do i no this ! i heard it from a man that went to hell and back. KING JAMES IS IN HELL so be very carfull with gods word it is alive and moving.
@MrTrott2hot I wonder if you are going to take advice and actually do the research into the background of the different versions. The supporting documents and what has been changed and not just keep repeating what you have heard about King James. Do the research yourself.
@MrTrott2hot You heard this from a man that 'went to hell and back?' Really. And this man somehow learned truth in hell and saw K.James there. This is the proof you are standing on?
The truth is king james resides in hell. What king james did was approve the removal of entire books and verses from the bible to suit his beliefs at the time. I am not just making this up, the information came from a person who died and came back. I think people should know this. You can find fault with all all the different versions of bibles written so just cross reference like i do. If you truly love god and want to find him you will. Regardless of what version of bible you read .SHALOM.
@MrTrott2hot I would suggest to you to watch Gail Riplinger New Age Bible versions, here on Y tube. She has many degrees and did extensive studies into the different versions. It is a 2 part program and very informative. I saw it today for the first time and highly recommend it.
I used to use only NIV (the non inspired version), not knowing that it mattered which version I used. Then one day while reading Jude in a Bible with both versions printed side by side I read the first verse of both versions and stopped. Wait a minute..there is a big difference between being sanctified (KJV) and being loved (NIV) by God. That led me to see if there were any more differences and what I found shocked me. I am now totally KJV all the way.
@yupyup1562 The KJV to a knew christian or child is like feeding them steak instead of milk. I have a few different bibles some over 100 years old. They all differ some what.The NIV is easy to understand and i have been reading it for years. It has not changed me any more than the KJV. Its a great bible for the right person. If your heading to hell a bible know matter which one not the satanic one would tell you what you needed to do to gain salvation. Gods word is alive and moving always.
@MrTrott2hot I completely disagree.I read to my 6yr old each night from KJV and have since she was 3. She memorizes verses from it, we talk about God and Jesus all the time.She has a wonderful grasp of the Word.Children are smarter than you think. "Raise a child in the way it should go and they will not depart from it..." Start when they are young.It is in waiting until older that people have difficulty at first reading the KJV. Yet, with consistent reading it becomes quite clear.
@yupyup1562 I here what your saying ! But like i told you the NIV is the right bible for the right person. You can understand it better. It doesnt mean you wont love god any less.King james was a tyrant. Lets say he published the NIV version back then and so people grew up with that. Then sudenly a version of king james came out. You would then critasize that version because you were already conditioned to believe the other one.God put king james in hell for what he did with his word.
@MrTrott2hot I disagree with you. I did not choose to read the KJV only based on publishing order, likewise I don't criticize the NIV because it came out later. As I said I read the NIV for 25 years with no question then stumbled onto verses in which the meaning...not just the ease of reading...was changed in the NIV. It has nothing to do with conditioning.
@yupyup1562 Above all else GOD is love and nobody on earth can say they have complete knowledge of his ways we are always learning what one verse says and means to one, the lord will give a different meaning to another on exactly the same verse. The different bibles god uses for his divive purpose.Only a fooll will believe that his version of the word of god is the correct interpretation. So much is missing and lost in translation thats why we have the holy spirit to lead us in all truth.
@MrTrott2hot I don't agree with you on this either. I have not met anyone who see Jn 3:16 meaning something different than what it says. If the Bible is rightly divided then there are few disagreements on meaning.
@MrTrott2hot I do agree that thankfully when we are born again we do have the Holy Spirit to lead us in the truth. Many who are not saved and read the Bible do not have the Holy Spirit to lead them and the Word can mean nothing to them or seem foolish.
@MrTrott2hot Because you only read the NIV, you do not understand the difference. It doesn't matter the age of the Bible, but what it contains does matter. Research the verses that are missing from the NIV. Read them. Then ask yourself if it matters.
@MrTrott2hot As in Gail Riplinger's research..according to the Kincaid Reading Analysis, the KJV reads at a 5.8 grade level (5th grade, 8 months), the NIV at 8.4 and NKJV at 6.9 grade level. The KJV uses the smallest number of syllables per word, the fewest letters per word and the fewest words per sentence. It also uses cognitive scaffolding with words that bread down easily into understanding. All showing the KJV is the easiest version to understand.
@yupyup1562 The King James Bible, published in 1611, was England's authorized version of the Bible translated from the original Hebrew and Greek languages into English at the request of King James I of England. At the time, other English Bibles existed, but King James did not like the most popular translation, the Geneva Bible, because he felt that some of the marginal notes encouraged disobedience to kings.
@yupyup1562 FirstI want to affirm with all evangelical Christians that the Bible isthe Word of God, inerrant, inspired, and our final authority for faith and life.However, nowhere in the Bible am I told that only one translation of it is the correct one. Nowhere am I told that the King James Bible is the best or only ‘holy’ BibleThere is no verse that tells me how God will preserve his word,so I can have no scriptural warrant for arguing that the King James has exclusive rights to the throne
@yupyup1562 the King James Bible has undergone three revisions since its inception in 1611, incorporating more than 100,000 changes. Which King James Bible is inspired, therefore? 300 words found in the KJV no longer bear the same meaning—e.g., “Suffer little children…to come unto me” (Matt 19:14). “Study to shew thyself approved unto God” (2 Tim 2:15). Should we really embrace a Bible as the best translation when it uses language not clearly understood
@yupyup1562 when the KJV was first published, it was heavily resisted for being too easy to understand! Some people revere it today because it is difficult to understand. I fear that part of their response is due to pride: they feel as though they are able to discern something that other, less spiritual folks cannot.
@yupyup1562 I could go on and on and you would still not get the point. So i am going to leave it there.If king james speaks to you good. If the niv speaks to you good.If the geneva speaks to you good. If other countries language bibles speak to you good. I have a few bibles that i cross referance and this is good. No one can say that god only speaks through his interpratation. Verses added and verses left out only god will judge.
It begs the question what is truth? I am dismayed but relieved that I have been looking and searching for some specific answers and they unfold at every location on this google. Three main topics need to be addressed. Our country, (leaders) Corporations, Government and this anti-Christ. It does not end anywhere and thank you Holy Spirit for your guidance through all this mess. Jesus tells us to test everything out and not touch any thing defiled. There are many out of the loop here save em
Ck out the process used to deliver the 1611,KJV. TRANSLATION was done by multiple teams of experts, all working on the same verse independently, verse by verse, from original languages, compared multiple times by higher level panels before authorizing... if you have never researched the process, you should... it will help clear the fog... press on
Publisher: Rupert Murdock, "owns" the rights to the NIV... is making the newest editions neutral gender... do a little research and see the Word of God being attacked. There is a BIG difference between translating and "interpreting". Remember, not one yot or tittle...
Also, I used to go around correcting people that said, "The love of money is the root of all evil." I would say to them the corrupt NIV version and explain to them that I learned that in THE BIBLE. I wonder how Satan could use something like that. I believe that God works ALL things for the good to those who love Him and I know that He allowed me those years with the perverted bible up until the day that I realized that they were corrupt. After learning all this, why would you still use NIV?
I didn't hear you say anything about 1Timothy 6:10 but my apologies if you did. KJV: For the love of money is THE root of ALL EVIL: NIV: For the love of money is A root of ALL KINDS of evil. I used the NIV for many years until I discovered it's flaws. At that point, I COULDN'T use it anymore. Why would the publishers do this? This changes the whole meaning and actually makes one or the other WRONG. Which one is wrong? KJV ONLY all others are PER versions. BTW, throw away your Billy Joel!
i heard that the nikj version is being printed by the publishing company that prints the satan bible.it s owned by the evil ones i saw a yt vid i was shocked as well
@DefendYourRights1 also the jewish massorites (scribes) did all this evil they basically changed history so when all of the israelites wake up we would still call on the the devil unknowingly!! look up GATHERING 144 on here the "YHWH"deception answers all questions
@DefendYourRights1 the "YHWH" Was in-serted into the bible when tge israelites went into captivity along with lord,god,jesus,jahovah,jah, and all the other names!! His name is AHAYAH ASHAR AHAYAH, I AM THAT I AM.
The Bible warns of wicked scribes pens , But I find this reassuring , 1188 chapters in the KJV , verse 118:8 is the Center of the whole Bible , And It reads ; It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man , Now look at the Center 2 words of this verse......THE LORD ! Now if this book was compromised, this won't work ! Try it on the other Bibles and see what happens . : ) Dont you love these Miracles that he leaves us in Scripture !
What has perked my interest is that the MOST HIGH told Moses that the Isrealites where to call him I AM THAT I AM , So WHY does the words Jehova and Yahweh come into the picture ? Now the Angel Gabriel told Joeseph to name the Messiah Emmanuel , Them it said BEING INTERPRETED as JESUS , Well I tried to find the word Jesus in {Hebrew} Strongs concordance. Not there , Then I did YHWH ,not there ? Can someone shed any wisdom ?
@jesuskingofall100 Just for your information...when referring to God, He is ALWAYS to be referred to with the first letter in upper case. ie; God...He...Him...His...etc.
The idea behind the newer translations including the NIV was to make the thoughts behind Bible verses easier to understand as language changed over the centuries. The new translations were meticulously scurinized by dozens of Bible scholars for years before they were accepted for publication. If you want to read the original texts strait from the "horses mouth", learn Greek and Aramaic. If not, trust the experts. All scripture is God breathed.
Why does Matthew 17:21 exist only as a footnote in the King James Bible and not as a verse?
"The verse is not included in the newer Bibles because the older and better manuscripts of Matthew do not include it. The translators of the older Bibles were not as careful in the manuscripts they used. Apparently in the process of copying the manuscripts, someone at a much later date copied the verse from the Gospel of Mark and added it to the Matthew account. "
How does this shock anyone? The bible has been interpreted and translated and changed every which way. Go read Bart Erman, the bible scholar. He constantly cites this kind of stuff all over the bible throughout history.
I have been on this study of satanic bible translations -since 2006 or so. It is so true. My daughter and I only read KJV. Bless The Most High for opening ppls eyes thru His humble vessels, such as you!
You are right @jokymz. Research the word 'Amen.' It can also be spelled Amon, or Amun. Decide for yourself. For @shinsplints101 research 'astral projection' and 'hallograms.' My people parish for lack of knowledge!
How many folks know that King James (who commissioned the King James Bible and to whom it was dedicated) loved men and had sex with them? At the age of thirteen James fell madly in love with his male cousin Esme Stuart whom he made Duke of Lennox. King James 1 was a known homosexual who murdered his young lovers and victimized countless heretics and women. His cruelty was justified by his "divine right" of kings.
@adnetjm I will tell you this, just as God's truth is released for all who choose to hear - so is satan's lies. Invovle yourself in evil attacks against the Word of The Most High or Choose Truth.
concerning KJV vs NIV or other modern translation. If you just do some research you will learn that the KJV was the new translation in it's day coming out after a number of much older versions as well. What tells us the KJV is more correct. The NIV is translated from manuscripts older than the KJV. It is just as likely the verses misisng in the NIV were added to the KJV by the translators of the time to make surrounding verses easier to understand in their day.
what shocks me is that you blindly put misinformation up without thought of the consequences.
The NIV copyrights holders are Biblica a great ministry. The company Zondervan, also a purely Christian and upright organization have the exclusive right for distribution. Zondervan became a division of Harper Collins in 1988 who is a huge publisher however they still operate as it's own entity so your story is very damaging and incorrect.
@jokymz you went from satanic to satanic. You should've switched to KJV, the original. NKJV is in the same spot as NIV. Also, to the other commenters, King James was straight, your comment was proven a lie, long ago. 2, a manuscript can be older and survive if its used less. Ex: thrown away because of error. If you use a book a lot more, more copies need to be made cause it breaks faster. Just because something is older doesn't always mean its right.
I am Jerry Wayne Givens, I am a true Seer. The King JamesVerson of the bible. Is the only most accurate, and consice, version of the true Bible. You are very nice, my prayers go out to you. For helping me Inlighten, the world of the truth. There are those who believed the end of time, would come in 1012. I can assusre this is another deception of (The Devil). For I am one of God's coosen. We that are choosen, know the truth, for we are no lie.
During the 20,12 elingment at dawn VENUS- aka, Morning Star- aka, BAAL- aka BEELZEBUB- aka, Morning Star will be a dot in the middle of the sun. what else is a star in the middle of a circle?- aka "The Pentagram". The King James bible after the council of nicea did their changing it was 6" inches thick and had 66 chapters 666. The Father in heaven is in you're words and harts not in that book man made that book, just ask him!
Thank you so much for the insight because i only have an NIV bible at home. I really noticed a few scripture verses missing some time ago but thought nothing of it. Thanks again.
All good liers use part of the truth to decieve who they are lying to.Satan is the father of lies. He used Gods word that he told Adam and twisted it with Eve. He used scripture he twisted when he tempted Jesus in the wilderness.Half the bible or twisting it is more dangerous that if the devil appeared right before you and threw fireballs in your face! All he has to do is get his twisted gospel to be believed.And many will be worshipping a false god.Keep your King James and reject ALL others!
I see what you're saying about the NIV Bible. I'm more of "The Message" Bible kind of man. But I'd still say, half of the Bible is better then no Bible at all. Thanks for sharing. Godspreed
the planet venus was known as Lucifer back in those times this was not a reference to jesus or satan this was about the fallen king of babylon, also Morning star translated in hebrew is lucifer, this is not the true morning star mentioned in rev 22:16, The king of babylon was the prefiguration of the beast that is why he was called the morning star, you could say that he was sort of an anti christ of his time but he was no the true morning star
"Morning Star, son of the dawn" is not Jesus, nor is it even Satan in the verse. Did you know that "Lucifer" is a Latin word? checkout the word "lucifer" and its true meaning, and you'll realize it may have nothing to do with satan at all.
Virginia Mollenkott was a lesbian involved with the NIV translation.
Gail Riplinger - New Age Bible Versions covers the topics raised in this posting.
The Holy Spirits role is to keep the Bible while Satan's is to destroy the Bible. Satan will attack using evolution and atheism to philosophy and theology. He attacks through our five senses.
Christians remember: 1John 4:4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.
look up the old italian meaning of lucifer, its is not the prince of darkness or Satan or the devil, it means enlightened one or one of light...wow ignorance must be bliss
Im with him. Theres no god no heaven but spirits dont disapear. I think we are all ghots after death. I just dont know what to believe. No proof for both.
@MRandMSnannerPANTS - Gladly you “don’t know what to believe.” Therefore unsure in what you also say what you believe or rather “think.” “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. For by it the elders obtained a good report. Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.”
@MRandMSnannerPANTS “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. Joh 3:16-18
Stop wasting your life with god there is no god! You simply die thats it get over it!
What are you going to do in heaven? Eat food? No have sex? No
We have an energy a spirit inside ua all however that energy simply dissapaites when we die. Nothing more nothing less!
Whats more feasible ... A bunch on people get together and wrote the bible or that a man actually walked on water? You do realise the popular thought was that jesus wasnt a god until a king of rome made it law to belive it!
@shinsplints101 My dear anti-God and anti-Christ. I weep and pray for you. I don’t fear death, because I know Whom I can trust my life with, but you don’t even have something to live for. It is deceivers like modern translators who try to mislead lost people like you with their universal “bible”. Even in South- Africa with the New Translation of the Afrikaans Bible the true meaning of God’s Word are written out of it. The Holy Spirit will not be silenced.
@shinsplints101 I don't know about all that but Criss Angel does some pretty out there stuff he did walk on water and down the side off a tall building and up it. He's a mind freak for sure. He can levitate a person right in front of you. My mom swears he's got a devil. Some say he really does have some powers that he obviously uses for exploit of himself and his own glory. I think Jesus did great things and was humble giving praise to God not self. He said he was Gods son.
@shinsplints101 if there is no god then why do people like you spend so much time trying to convince us there is not? why do you care and most definatly wast your time?
rev:22.19 if anyone takes anything away from the prophetic words of this book,god will take away from him his share of the fruit of tree of life and of the holy city which are described in this book... tanx for the alert... Hapi nw yr 2012 evri1... :)
Not to worry. They who choose the losing side in a predetermined outcome, are complete morons and will only regret their doings in the swimmingpool of fire and pain. Good riddance!
the kjv is not the original manuscripts. kjv actually added some verses that are not in the manuscripts original. forget the niv. read the holmans or the nasb
NASB is thought by some to be more accurate than the KJV. The NIV is smoother reading, and Hank Hannigraf thinks it the most accurate thought for thought translation. The real text is in Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic (Mark), not English. The KJV has elements of the Vulgate which could introduce inaccuracy (or maybe not). Get an interlinear to see what the real NT version says. My Interlinear NT has Greek, the equivalent English words under the Greek words, the NIV and the KJV all together...
Nothing has come from the "modern versions" since 1881 but confusion and error, but no one in 400 years has ever proven any linguistic of historical fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in fully legible English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world--just as Koine Greek was during the Apostolic Era.
"The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times" (Psalm 12:6).
Those verses that were taken out in the NIV are in bracket in the KJV. Have you wondered why that is so , before you jump to conclusion? If you love the KJV so much, perhaps you should ask them to take away the brackets.
Very well done. I was shocked to hear that the publishers of the NIV and the Satanic Bible are one and the same and that they took out the most important part of the Lord's prayer in thy kingdom come thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Sounds to me like the work of some low life scumbag devil and his loser followers.
@TheUltimateRampage94 The NASB is the most accurate translation, but accurately based on CORRUPT texts. It is based on the Westcott and Hort text who were proven to be occultists. The text is derived from the corrupt Alexandrian manuscripts & Sinaiticus which was found in a trash can. The KJV text is based on the Textus Receptus which represents 95% of all known manuscripts. Satan is responsible for all the different translations we have today.
I found this out by reading the chick track called "The attack." You can read it online as well as "The Godfathers". It is in the footnotes, but one reads thinking they are reading the whole word of God. They are not noticing that versus skip. It is wrong. The NIV and other translations were written by the Catholic Church. Go to chick.com and look up Catholicism and then go to the Alberto Rivera series. They were the start of WWI and WWI and the Holocost. Read the truth and dont be deceived.
now you ask what was the rich man and Lazarus really about? the rich man was a symbol of Isreal, after all his father was Abraham, Lazarus had sores on his body. what do sores symbolize in the bible? Sin. he was covered from head to toe in them. he was begging for crumbs. the rich man had all he could eat. this is taking the bible for granted... the poor man cherished every crumb. the rich man had need of nothing. Jesus was a beggar! he took sin of the whole world on himself. Beggars will live.
as for the translation of hell, Sheol literally means grave. so this translation is correct. king Solomon says "the dead know nothing" king David says "the dead praise not the lord" now either king David was lying or confused, or.... modern belief about heaven and hell are wrong. my grandma is not up in heaven or burning in hell, she is in the grave. just like everyone else. but what about "the rich man and Lazarus"? it was a parable... what about the thief on the cross? no commas in Greek...
The rich man and Lazarus was NOT a parable. No parable uses proper names. This was a historical account. Further, Jesus only ever sided with the Pharisees one time, and that was against the Saducees regarding this very topic. How else can one interpret Lu 13:22-29? Finally, your Grandmother - her body is in the Grave, where is her spirit? Not in the Grave! The texts from David and Solomon may well refer to corpses. Certainly corpses, "the dead," in the grave don't think or speak.
@357MagnumBob i m sorry if i stired up anger. this was not my intent. i was mearly saying what my parents raised me to believe. people in my church have told me that spirit translates to breath and that it returns to god when we die. i could be wrong about this. but in my mind it makes sense. i looked at lu 13 22-29 and the only thing that pops to my mind is the phrase i do not know you. in Jeremiah 22:16 it explains what it is to know the lord.
@357MagnumBob forgive me but i am not an expert in the bible, but i try hard :) this text from Jeremiah and luke would indicate that many people will come to the door of heaven requesting to be let in on the basis of prophecy in the name of the lord. however jeremiah indicates that those who are let in defend the poor. so what you and i do here on youtube, explaining the scriptures to one another is useless if we don't go to the poor and feed them real food. and clothe them.
the bright morning star refers to Christ, however Lucifer once held the same position in heaven as Jesus as arch-angel. that is why in Issiah talks of the light that fell from heaven. obviously Satan. previously known as Lucifer. the translation is correct, however it can cause confusion for someone who only reads the surface of the words and does not compare scripture to scripture.
yes i agree that the translation of morning star can be confuseing. that is why the kjv is so vital. however take all the translations into account before splitting hairs. if you study the bible closely, Jesus and lucifer had the same job in heaven. archangels. the ones who cover. i know it is controversial. but study it. micheal and angel of the lord are the same. the dead in christ shall rise at the shout of the arch-angel. lucifer means light bearer, his name was changed to "the accuser"
Wow, absolutely true! I checked the accuracy of your findings with a copy of a New World scriptural translation. Every passage that you listed really had been deleted its publishers! What's up with THAT???? Indeed, Satan works through trickery. In this case, an omission is a lie. God bless, and may you be protected by His angels. (I'm outta that, too.)
Jesus was NOT called the moring star! That is satan name in the Bible! There's also over 900 hundred verses they remove from NIV, so this means if you want the truth read the KJV!
Footnotes of the missing verses are found at the bottom of the NIV. We have bothe KJV and NIV at home and does not depend only one version. what is important is you learn to hear the voice of the Holy Spirit and know what is of the Lord and what is not. Why be afraid of deception if you have to Holy Spirit to lead you into ALL TRUTH? God knows who truly belongs to Him and will not allow us to fall if our hearts are after Him. God bless us all!!1
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The name "Lucifer" actually MEANS "son of the morning", or MORNING STAR, goddammit, so THERE, goddammit! You're sincere... but your asshole is SINCERELY WRONG, godfuckingdammit, goddammit, GODFUCKHISASS!!!
It's sincerey wrong Christians like y'all that make me curse the throne God fucknig sits on, goddammit! Threatening men with eternal damnation and fucking getting His facts fucked-up wrong, goddammit!
Naw, naw, NAW, godfuckingdammit! Those parts the NIV leaves out were NOT FOUND in the EARLIEST MANUSCRIPTS from which we get our Bible today, goddammit!!! I John 5:7 was added by later translators to make the text run smoothly. Ever see those italicized words in your Kings Jaes Version, goddammit? Same with them too!
Damn! God's poor deceived children!!!
WHY doesn't God keep His fucking shit together IF He is REALLY FUCKING aLL-KNOWING AND aLL-POWERFUL, goddammit!
That's what happened when Westcott & Hort helped to corrupt the newer translations from the Alexandrian Egyptian Texts. The KJV was translated from the Antioch Texts. Zondervan is owned by Harper-Collins now. Yes, they are the ones that published the satanic bible. Get the book, "Look What's Missing".
PERSONALLY I PREFER THE NKJV OR THE KJV, BUT I HAVE READ THE NIV, AND I HAVE NOTICED MISSING VERSES BUT I FOUND OUT THAT SINCE THE ORIGINAL BIBLE OR THE SCROLLS WERE NOT DONE IN VERSES THEY CAME IN ONE LUMB TO PUT IT THAT WAY, SO THEY THEY TRANSLATED IT IN ENGLISH IT WAS MADE INTO VERSES, AND PUNCTUATION WAS ADDED, HEBREW HAS NO PUNCTUATION. ALSO CHECK IN THE NKJV IN ISAIAH 14: 12 IN THE WORD LUCIFER HAS A ( I ) ON TOP OF IT, LOOK IN THE COLUMN IT SAIS LIT. DAY STAR, BECAUSE HE WAS A STAR
I am definitely concerned about the "Morning Star" illusion you mentioned and that the publishers also published the satanic bible. I must state that in the NIV bible that I have, there are notes at the bottom of the page which has any removed passages. In regards to the lords prayer, I was brought up a catholic and never heard the "for thyne is the kingdom...." ending to the lords prayer as this is only in the King James version and no other version of the bible. (not to say that it's wrong).
I got a better idea..just get rid off every religious text/scriputure permanently off the face of the earth and all problems will start to get solve as we can being to focus on things that really matter and are affecting our world like war, hunger, and the federal reserve bank...
By the way notice that in Revelations 22:16 NIV, the "Morning Star" (Jesus) was in capital letters, different from the "morning star" in Isaiah 14:12 NIV.
The part on Jesus telling the disciples some demons would not come out by prayer and fasting (Matthew 17:21) , was also in the NIV footnote. THEY ARE ALL IN THE FOOTNOTE. So dont make too much fuss. Thanks for pointing out anyway
I did researches on these differences, during the translation for KJV version, "Lucifer" was the name of a bright star in the sky at that time. Why they used it probably because people that time knew what "Lucifer" meant. That was why the "morning star" was used in Isaiah 14:12 NIV. And all the verses you mentioned that NIV took out in Matthew 6:9-13 , 1 John 5:7-8, Acts 8:35-38, THEY ARE ALL THERE IN NIV version FOOTNOTE!! And yes I DO READ FOOTNOTES when I read the NIV. Please take note GUYS!
Footnotes are not Scripture. All Scripture is inspired; not footnotes. Footnotes are what the translators thought, not what God knows. The King James translators only set cross-references in the margins, no extra thoughts. The Holy Ghost should lead you through Scripture and thought, not translators.
@DinoDude65 please get yourself a copy of NIV and turn to the missing verses mentioned in this video. They are ALL in the footnotes EXACTLY as they were in KJV, EXACT VERSES. They are not what the translators thought. THey are as exactly what was written in KJV.
But the fact that they removed them from Scripture, denoting them with the infamous "The most reliable manuscripts..." They're using corrupted manuscripts to "correct" the King James version. And if the footnotes are just as in the KJV, why even read a NIV? What's wrong with the KJV? If it's readability, then your sorely mistaken. The KJV ranked at a fifth grade reading level on the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level, whereas the NIV was eighth.
@DinoDude65 Everytime a version is copied by hand, errors were certain to be made. The KJV would probably contain translation errors too. Revised versions were published because the English language grew and changed through the centuries. Moreover, an older and better Greek text than the one used for KJV came to light in newly-discovered ancient manuscripts. I am not saying NIV is better than KJV but that NIV did not really "removed" the verses and not as corrupted as you guys believed it to be.
No one is talking about religion. We're talking about the Bible: a historical document. Nearly everything (except Revelation of course) has been confirmed by secular science. Long before secular historians knew about the Hittite empire, the Bible mentioned them. Eventually, some remains in the Middle east were found that suggested the existence of the Hittites. There is not one unproved statement in the Holy Bible. Except Revelation, again, it's prophecy.
@DinoDude65 If anything is religious, it's humanism, which places man as god. Just as the serpent told Eve, that if she ate the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, she could be like God.
@DinoDude65 [please read my previous reply first] by the way, KJV was not the first translation. WHY THERE WERE FOOTNOTES IN NIV? Because there were thousands of translation variations made that most were unimportant. The "missing verses" mentioned in this video, were in the NIV FOOTNOTES because they were regarded IMPORTANT variants of translation not to be missed, but they were one of the translation variant.
The difference between a "Version" and a "Translation" is striking. If you are unaware you might want to investigate. Translations will always be more accurate. A version on the other hand will always carry more of a bent towards the translators own prejudiced bents. Of course because the way language is there can be no pure translation of the Holy Scriptures into any language. A good translation will be as literal as possible, and take little liberties when unable to literally translate.
I'm sitting in the same boat, in some portions of this. I see some problems with the NIV. Most of it really does come down to the different texts it was translated from. But yes, there is much I do not like about it. But at the same time, there's some serious blowing out of proportion and lack of wisdom or scholarship from the KJV only community. I'm not going to sit back and completely say you are wrong on everything though.
WOW! THAT'S WHAT I'VE BEEN COMPLAINING ABOUT ALL ALONG. THE NIV NOT ONLY OMITS SEVERAL SCRIPTURES, BUT ALSO COMPLETELY CHANGES SCRIPTURES; SUCH AS PSALMS 136-- HIS LOVE ENDURES FOREVER INSTEAD OF HIS MERCY ENDURES FOREVER. LOVE INSTEAD OF CHARITY. JEREMIAH 29--11 IS COMPLETELY CHANGED. ETC.ETC. READ THE BOOK OF PROVERBS FOR EXAMPLE. I HAVE A PARALLEL BIBLE WITH 8 DIFFERENT VERSIONS SIDE BY SIDE, AND THEY ARE OBVIOUSLY TEACHING ANOTHER GOSPEL. GOD RICHLY BLESS YOU AND BLESS YOU FOR SHARING.
you realize that the passages that "are taken out" were actually put in because the NIV is using an older original text for its source to translate? Don't do research comparing NIV to KJV learn greek and hebrew and do research comparing NIV and KJV to the oldest known texts.
Zondervan does not publish the satanist Bible... its parent company is HarperCollins and HarperCollins has another daughter company that publishes a book called "The Satanists Bible."
For the intentions, powers and strategies the devil and his demons use to deceive, oppress, possess and destroy, for beliefs and practices that open doors for demons to enter into a person’s life and the complete way of deliverance from curses, evil forces and demons, see the spiritual warfare book “Demons Behind Doors” (available on Amazon)
I am glad you are not against KJV people anymore. I have done this research also and that is the reason I stick with the KVJ. I have and do read other versions for comparison, but there is something about the KVJ that allows you to remember verses. It is not a "perfect" book (don't make an idol out of it), but it is the best thing we have. I have several different versions for the sake of research and comparison. Glad you are not against us anymore, people who choose to stick with the KJV. :-)
In many ways it seems we have been tricked into worshiping a false god..sun god.. Lucifer. Start with the sabbath which should be Saturday but it was all changed way back by the Romans to Sunday. So many things seem wrong in the churches I have been in. You are on the right track ..keep thinkin like that and dont stop looking for the truth
My inspiration for writting my comments came from the lord.And not from what everybody else thinks.I have seen parts of hell in vision it is terrifing beyond belief.What the lord has said about hell is true. In hell are whole church congrations and there preachers. Why ! because they were never told the entire truth. Even the muched loved pope john paul is in hell ! he wants to repent but the lord said to him it is tolate. SO WAKE UP PEOPLE.
MrTrott2hot 11 hours ago
You contradict yourself when you say "Im going to keep it real" then you start talking about the bible.
MrJihadJesus 16 hours ago
so glad you woke up watch the vid responce i just sent you it might shock you even more also again gail riplinger new age bible versions and the gays the 2 top commity members 1 was a gay man and the other a gay woman gail riplingers video will shock you to death and you will see why the church is the way it is now google niv perversion god bless
johninitforfun 1 day ago
new age bible versions gail riplinger its on my channel the entire word fasting is omitted further internet search niv perversion you will get it all there
johninitforfun 1 day ago
@johninitforfun After watching a little from your site, are you saying that it is our works that gets us into heaven? That salvation is in our hands?
yupyup1562 20 hours ago
King james was a tyrant with his own ambitions and changed wording ! plus left out important books of the bible just to satisfy himself and his own beliefs at the time. But please dont get me wrong the word of god is true in there. But it is not all there and some is not interpreted correctly. How do i no this ! i heard it from a man that went to hell and back. KING JAMES IS IN HELL so be very carfull with gods word it is alive and moving.
MrTrott2hot 1 day ago
@MrTrott2hot I wonder if you are going to take advice and actually do the research into the background of the different versions. The supporting documents and what has been changed and not just keep repeating what you have heard about King James. Do the research yourself.
yupyup1562 20 hours ago
@MrTrott2hot You heard this from a man that 'went to hell and back?' Really. And this man somehow learned truth in hell and saw K.James there. This is the proof you are standing on?
yupyup1562 20 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The truth is king james resides in hell. What king james did was approve the removal of entire books and verses from the bible to suit his beliefs at the time. I am not just making this up, the information came from a person who died and came back. I think people should know this. You can find fault with all all the different versions of bibles written so just cross reference like i do. If you truly love god and want to find him you will. Regardless of what version of bible you read .SHALOM.
MrTrott2hot 1 day ago
@MrTrott2hot I would suggest to you to watch Gail Riplinger New Age Bible versions, here on Y tube. She has many degrees and did extensive studies into the different versions. It is a 2 part program and very informative. I saw it today for the first time and highly recommend it.
yupyup1562 15 hours ago
I used to use only NIV (the non inspired version), not knowing that it mattered which version I used. Then one day while reading Jude in a Bible with both versions printed side by side I read the first verse of both versions and stopped. Wait a minute..there is a big difference between being sanctified (KJV) and being loved (NIV) by God. That led me to see if there were any more differences and what I found shocked me. I am now totally KJV all the way.
yupyup1562 1 day ago
@yupyup1562 The KJV to a knew christian or child is like feeding them steak instead of milk. I have a few different bibles some over 100 years old. They all differ some what.The NIV is easy to understand and i have been reading it for years. It has not changed me any more than the KJV. Its a great bible for the right person. If your heading to hell a bible know matter which one not the satanic one would tell you what you needed to do to gain salvation. Gods word is alive and moving always.
MrTrott2hot 1 day ago
@MrTrott2hot I completely disagree.I read to my 6yr old each night from KJV and have since she was 3. She memorizes verses from it, we talk about God and Jesus all the time.She has a wonderful grasp of the Word.Children are smarter than you think. "Raise a child in the way it should go and they will not depart from it..." Start when they are young.It is in waiting until older that people have difficulty at first reading the KJV. Yet, with consistent reading it becomes quite clear.
yupyup1562 1 day ago
@yupyup1562 I here what your saying ! But like i told you the NIV is the right bible for the right person. You can understand it better. It doesnt mean you wont love god any less.King james was a tyrant. Lets say he published the NIV version back then and so people grew up with that. Then sudenly a version of king james came out. You would then critasize that version because you were already conditioned to believe the other one.God put king james in hell for what he did with his word.
MrTrott2hot 1 day ago
@MrTrott2hot I disagree with you. I did not choose to read the KJV only based on publishing order, likewise I don't criticize the NIV because it came out later. As I said I read the NIV for 25 years with no question then stumbled onto verses in which the meaning...not just the ease of reading...was changed in the NIV. It has nothing to do with conditioning.
yupyup1562 20 hours ago
@yupyup1562 Above all else GOD is love and nobody on earth can say they have complete knowledge of his ways we are always learning what one verse says and means to one, the lord will give a different meaning to another on exactly the same verse. The different bibles god uses for his divive purpose.Only a fooll will believe that his version of the word of god is the correct interpretation. So much is missing and lost in translation thats why we have the holy spirit to lead us in all truth.
MrTrott2hot 1 day ago
@MrTrott2hot I don't agree with you on this either. I have not met anyone who see Jn 3:16 meaning something different than what it says. If the Bible is rightly divided then there are few disagreements on meaning.
yupyup1562 20 hours ago
@MrTrott2hot God is a God of love but also a Just God who will come in wrath one day. "Accept the lamb or face the Lion."
yupyup1562 20 hours ago
@MrTrott2hot I do agree that thankfully when we are born again we do have the Holy Spirit to lead us in the truth. Many who are not saved and read the Bible do not have the Holy Spirit to lead them and the Word can mean nothing to them or seem foolish.
yupyup1562 20 hours ago
@MrTrott2hot Because you only read the NIV, you do not understand the difference. It doesn't matter the age of the Bible, but what it contains does matter. Research the verses that are missing from the NIV. Read them. Then ask yourself if it matters.
yupyup1562 1 day ago
@MrTrott2hot As in Gail Riplinger's research..according to the Kincaid Reading Analysis, the KJV reads at a 5.8 grade level (5th grade, 8 months), the NIV at 8.4 and NKJV at 6.9 grade level. The KJV uses the smallest number of syllables per word, the fewest letters per word and the fewest words per sentence. It also uses cognitive scaffolding with words that bread down easily into understanding. All showing the KJV is the easiest version to understand.
yupyup1562 15 hours ago
@yupyup1562 The King James Bible, published in 1611, was England's authorized version of the Bible translated from the original Hebrew and Greek languages into English at the request of King James I of England. At the time, other English Bibles existed, but King James did not like the most popular translation, the Geneva Bible, because he felt that some of the marginal notes encouraged disobedience to kings.
MrTrott2hot 13 hours ago
@yupyup1562 FirstI want to affirm with all evangelical Christians that the Bible isthe Word of God, inerrant, inspired, and our final authority for faith and life.However, nowhere in the Bible am I told that only one translation of it is the correct one. Nowhere am I told that the King James Bible is the best or only ‘holy’ BibleThere is no verse that tells me how God will preserve his word,so I can have no scriptural warrant for arguing that the King James has exclusive rights to the throne
MrTrott2hot 13 hours ago
@yupyup1562 the King James Bible has undergone three revisions since its inception in 1611, incorporating more than 100,000 changes. Which King James Bible is inspired, therefore? 300 words found in the KJV no longer bear the same meaning—e.g., “Suffer little children…to come unto me” (Matt 19:14). “Study to shew thyself approved unto God” (2 Tim 2:15). Should we really embrace a Bible as the best translation when it uses language not clearly understood
MrTrott2hot 12 hours ago
@yupyup1562 when the KJV was first published, it was heavily resisted for being too easy to understand! Some people revere it today because it is difficult to understand. I fear that part of their response is due to pride: they feel as though they are able to discern something that other, less spiritual folks cannot.
MrTrott2hot 12 hours ago
@yupyup1562 I could go on and on and you would still not get the point. So i am going to leave it there.If king james speaks to you good. If the niv speaks to you good.If the geneva speaks to you good. If other countries language bibles speak to you good. I have a few bibles that i cross referance and this is good. No one can say that god only speaks through his interpratation. Verses added and verses left out only god will judge.
Who knows what god inspired translators to right.
MrTrott2hot 12 hours ago
It begs the question what is truth? I am dismayed but relieved that I have been looking and searching for some specific answers and they unfold at every location on this google. Three main topics need to be addressed. Our country, (leaders) Corporations, Government and this anti-Christ. It does not end anywhere and thank you Holy Spirit for your guidance through all this mess. Jesus tells us to test everything out and not touch any thing defiled. There are many out of the loop here save em
RhikELee 3 days ago
revelations 22 vr 18 & 19
terrabletees2 4 days ago
Ck out the process used to deliver the 1611,KJV. TRANSLATION was done by multiple teams of experts, all working on the same verse independently, verse by verse, from original languages, compared multiple times by higher level panels before authorizing... if you have never researched the process, you should... it will help clear the fog... press on
agc3fcn 1 week ago
Publisher: Rupert Murdock, "owns" the rights to the NIV... is making the newest editions neutral gender... do a little research and see the Word of God being attacked. There is a BIG difference between translating and "interpreting". Remember, not one yot or tittle...
agc3fcn 1 week ago
Also, I used to go around correcting people that said, "The love of money is the root of all evil." I would say to them the corrupt NIV version and explain to them that I learned that in THE BIBLE. I wonder how Satan could use something like that. I believe that God works ALL things for the good to those who love Him and I know that He allowed me those years with the perverted bible up until the day that I realized that they were corrupt. After learning all this, why would you still use NIV?
chefjimmie1 1 week ago
I didn't hear you say anything about 1Timothy 6:10 but my apologies if you did. KJV: For the love of money is THE root of ALL EVIL: NIV: For the love of money is A root of ALL KINDS of evil. I used the NIV for many years until I discovered it's flaws. At that point, I COULDN'T use it anymore. Why would the publishers do this? This changes the whole meaning and actually makes one or the other WRONG. Which one is wrong? KJV ONLY all others are PER versions. BTW, throw away your Billy Joel!
chefjimmie1 1 week ago
this is a lie. ihave the niv in front of me and there are several references to hell
lymphedema100 1 week ago
@lymphedema100 The NIV is your problem.
DigitalPraise7 3 days ago
Thank u! I needed that knowledge!
lasheieka325 1 week ago
I've compared 8 different Bibles and will only use KJV1611.
ETHIOLOGIST1 1 week ago
And why, why would it be removed in the NIV? OH WHY? lol...
SIROFNOBLERECORDS 2 weeks ago
Our CREATOR's name is YAHUWAH...not god.
runrunawaynow 3 weeks ago
UR NOT AN AVATAR!
MARCPIMP32 2 weeks ago
''I did some research'' You read a science book?
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
i heard that the nikj version is being printed by the publishing company that prints the satan bible.it s owned by the evil ones i saw a yt vid i was shocked as well
AMELIA6659 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DefendYourRights1 also the jewish massorites (scribes) did all this evil they basically changed history so when all of the israelites wake up we would still call on the the devil unknowingly!! look up GATHERING 144 on here the "YHWH"deception answers all questions
midwestgz40 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DefendYourRights1 the "YHWH" Was in-serted into the bible when tge israelites went into captivity along with lord,god,jesus,jahovah,jah, and all the other names!! His name is AHAYAH ASHAR AHAYAH, I AM THAT I AM.
midwestgz40 3 weeks ago
The Bible warns of wicked scribes pens , But I find this reassuring , 1188 chapters in the KJV , verse 118:8 is the Center of the whole Bible , And It reads ; It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man , Now look at the Center 2 words of this verse......THE LORD ! Now if this book was compromised, this won't work ! Try it on the other Bibles and see what happens . : ) Dont you love these Miracles that he leaves us in Scripture !
DefendYourRights1 3 weeks ago
What has perked my interest is that the MOST HIGH told Moses that the Isrealites where to call him I AM THAT I AM , So WHY does the words Jehova and Yahweh come into the picture ? Now the Angel Gabriel told Joeseph to name the Messiah Emmanuel , Them it said BEING INTERPRETED as JESUS , Well I tried to find the word Jesus in {Hebrew} Strongs concordance. Not there , Then I did YHWH ,not there ? Can someone shed any wisdom ?
DefendYourRights1 3 weeks ago
ok, so is the New King James version ok? I had a hard time schlooging through the King James version on ye olde English.
ANd is it that King James was a pederast (liked his boys), allegedly that bit was proven to be true....i'm just curious
PoxMulder 4 weeks ago
@jesuskingofall100 Just for your information...when referring to God, He is ALWAYS to be referred to with the first letter in upper case. ie; God...He...Him...His...etc.
Peace and God bless you.
gerry4ta 1 month ago
The idea behind the newer translations including the NIV was to make the thoughts behind Bible verses easier to understand as language changed over the centuries. The new translations were meticulously scurinized by dozens of Bible scholars for years before they were accepted for publication. If you want to read the original texts strait from the "horses mouth", learn Greek and Aramaic. If not, trust the experts. All scripture is God breathed.
God bless you all and peace be with you.
gerry4ta 1 month ago
@gerry4ta Do you know Aramaic?
MrsWeeklyFletes 1 month ago
@MrsWeeklyFletes Nope. I trust the experts.
gerry4ta 1 month ago
Why does Matthew 17:21 exist only as a footnote in the King James Bible and not as a verse?
"The verse is not included in the newer Bibles because the older and better manuscripts of Matthew do not include it. The translators of the older Bibles were not as careful in the manuscripts they used. Apparently in the process of copying the manuscripts, someone at a much later date copied the verse from the Gospel of Mark and added it to the Matthew account. "
gerry4ta 1 month ago
Look up mithra
anset33 1 month ago
They just told the truth
anset33 1 month ago
How does this shock anyone? The bible has been interpreted and translated and changed every which way. Go read Bart Erman, the bible scholar. He constantly cites this kind of stuff all over the bible throughout history.
TieXiongJi 1 month ago
Excellent info. Thanks for the work.
grannygrunt1000 1 month ago
I have been on this study of satanic bible translations -since 2006 or so. It is so true. My daughter and I only read KJV. Bless The Most High for opening ppls eyes thru His humble vessels, such as you!
KeeperOfGodsWord 1 month ago
You are right @jokymz. Research the word 'Amen.' It can also be spelled Amon, or Amun. Decide for yourself. For @shinsplints101 research 'astral projection' and 'hallograms.' My people parish for lack of knowledge!
vonmarie46 1 month ago
I use the living word.....is that bad?
sleepypinkyful 1 month ago
Thanks GOD Im a Muslim.
ArditHoti 1 month ago
How many folks know that King James (who commissioned the King James Bible and to whom it was dedicated) loved men and had sex with them? At the age of thirteen James fell madly in love with his male cousin Esme Stuart whom he made Duke of Lennox. King James 1 was a known homosexual who murdered his young lovers and victimized countless heretics and women. His cruelty was justified by his "divine right" of kings.
- Otto J. Scott, James the First
adnetjm 1 month ago
@adnetjm I will tell you this, just as God's truth is released for all who choose to hear - so is satan's lies. Invovle yourself in evil attacks against the Word of The Most High or Choose Truth.
KeeperOfGodsWord 1 month ago
This music is so good!!!!! love it if any 1 knows what this music is please message me :D 64
kaspastarr 1 month ago
concerning KJV vs NIV or other modern translation. If you just do some research you will learn that the KJV was the new translation in it's day coming out after a number of much older versions as well. What tells us the KJV is more correct. The NIV is translated from manuscripts older than the KJV. It is just as likely the verses misisng in the NIV were added to the KJV by the translators of the time to make surrounding verses easier to understand in their day.
The point-do some research.
jrmaximus 1 month ago
what shocks me is that you blindly put misinformation up without thought of the consequences.
The NIV copyrights holders are Biblica a great ministry. The company Zondervan, also a purely Christian and upright organization have the exclusive right for distribution. Zondervan became a division of Harper Collins in 1988 who is a huge publisher however they still operate as it's own entity so your story is very damaging and incorrect.
jrmaximus 1 month ago
@jrmaximus DID not Zondervan also publish the Satanic bible?
elysian95 1 month ago
@elysian95 No. It was published by Avon Books.
jrmaximus 1 month ago
this is very sad. why is the world full of deception on corruption? Thank you for this video. I quickly changed to NKJV.
jokymz 1 month ago
@jokymz you went from satanic to satanic. You should've switched to KJV, the original. NKJV is in the same spot as NIV. Also, to the other commenters, King James was straight, your comment was proven a lie, long ago. 2, a manuscript can be older and survive if its used less. Ex: thrown away because of error. If you use a book a lot more, more copies need to be made cause it breaks faster. Just because something is older doesn't always mean its right.
balvear 1 month ago
thank you!
VirtuousBeauty23 1 month ago
Dictionary definition: Seer: 1. a person who sees ; observer. 2. a person who
prophesies future events; prophet:
God's Defnition: A person, God has choosen to know of things, that are to
be expected in the future. One who does not tell of, some things, because
the father commands his silence. He is trusted by God, to be a faithful servant,
to keep God's will, first..... never to fall into deception!
Do not be decieved by faulse prophets.
I am a servant,my gift from God,
I am A seer
TheAnilater 1 month ago
I am Jerry Wayne Givens, I am a true Seer. The King JamesVerson of the bible. Is the only most accurate, and consice, version of the true Bible. You are very nice, my prayers go out to you. For helping me Inlighten, the world of the truth. There are those who believed the end of time, would come in 1012. I can assusre this is another deception of (The Devil). For I am one of God's coosen. We that are choosen, know the truth, for we are no lie.
TheAnilater 1 month ago
During the 20,12 elingment at dawn VENUS- aka, Morning Star- aka, BAAL- aka BEELZEBUB- aka, Morning Star will be a dot in the middle of the sun. what else is a star in the middle of a circle?- aka "The Pentagram". The King James bible after the council of nicea did their changing it was 6" inches thick and had 66 chapters 666. The Father in heaven is in you're words and harts not in that book man made that book, just ask him!
sluggodna 1 month ago
Thank you so much for the insight because i only have an NIV bible at home. I really noticed a few scripture verses missing some time ago but thought nothing of it. Thanks again.
SourSpice1000 1 month ago
.Thanks so much for this information. I am not at all surprised, this is how Satan works, and he IS the father of all lies.
magnoliatango 1 month ago
All good liers use part of the truth to decieve who they are lying to.Satan is the father of lies. He used Gods word that he told Adam and twisted it with Eve. He used scripture he twisted when he tempted Jesus in the wilderness.Half the bible or twisting it is more dangerous that if the devil appeared right before you and threw fireballs in your face! All he has to do is get his twisted gospel to be believed.And many will be worshipping a false god.Keep your King James and reject ALL others!
HumbleHeartMinistry 1 month ago
I see what you're saying about the NIV Bible. I'm more of "The Message" Bible kind of man. But I'd still say, half of the Bible is better then no Bible at all. Thanks for sharing. Godspreed
MerozCurse 1 month ago
the planet venus was known as Lucifer back in those times this was not a reference to jesus or satan this was about the fallen king of babylon, also Morning star translated in hebrew is lucifer, this is not the true morning star mentioned in rev 22:16, The king of babylon was the prefiguration of the beast that is why he was called the morning star, you could say that he was sort of an anti christ of his time but he was no the true morning star
hatfieldd 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Morning Star, son of the dawn" is not Jesus, nor is it even Satan in the verse. Did you know that "Lucifer" is a Latin word? checkout the word "lucifer" and its true meaning, and you'll realize it may have nothing to do with satan at all.
AnonKeys 1 month ago
niv better then no bible .helped me get saved. i didnt understand what shakspear was ye thuoing about in the kjv .
Gleantheword 1 month ago
A question to think about : ... How many times has this happened to other bibles in the past?
mercuryRed666 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
Virginia Mollenkott was a lesbian involved with the NIV translation.
Gail Riplinger - New Age Bible Versions covers the topics raised in this posting.
The Holy Spirits role is to keep the Bible while Satan's is to destroy the Bible. Satan will attack using evolution and atheism to philosophy and theology. He attacks through our five senses.
Christians remember: 1John 4:4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.
DonswatchingtheTube 1 month ago
The moreing star is the sun. And that is the lord star thanks al
stovelover63 1 month ago
Referring also to the sun of the dawn, the first start to show light in the early morning, venue....look that up
davidcox1616 1 month ago
look up the old italian meaning of lucifer, its is not the prince of darkness or Satan or the devil, it means enlightened one or one of light...wow ignorance must be bliss
davidcox1616 1 month ago
Im with him. Theres no god no heaven but spirits dont disapear. I think we are all ghots after death. I just dont know what to believe. No proof for both.
MRandMSnannerPANTS 1 month ago
@MRandMSnannerPANTS - Gladly you “don’t know what to believe.” Therefore unsure in what you also say what you believe or rather “think.” “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. For by it the elders obtained a good report. Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.”
authorhvh 1 month ago
@MRandMSnannerPANTS “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. Joh 3:16-18
authorhvh 1 month ago
check your history on the son of dawn .....????
punkfreud1 1 month ago
Stop wasting your life with god there is no god! You simply die thats it get over it!
What are you going to do in heaven? Eat food? No have sex? No
We have an energy a spirit inside ua all however that energy simply dissapaites when we die. Nothing more nothing less!
Whats more feasible ... A bunch on people get together and wrote the bible or that a man actually walked on water? You do realise the popular thought was that jesus wasnt a god until a king of rome made it law to belive it!
shinsplints101 1 month ago
@shinsplints101 sucks to be you
edgarchinngon 1 month ago
@shinsplints101 My dear anti-God and anti-Christ. I weep and pray for you. I don’t fear death, because I know Whom I can trust my life with, but you don’t even have something to live for. It is deceivers like modern translators who try to mislead lost people like you with their universal “bible”. Even in South- Africa with the New Translation of the Afrikaans Bible the true meaning of God’s Word are written out of it. The Holy Spirit will not be silenced.
authorhvh 1 month ago
@shinsplints101 I don't know about all that but Criss Angel does some pretty out there stuff he did walk on water and down the side off a tall building and up it. He's a mind freak for sure. He can levitate a person right in front of you. My mom swears he's got a devil. Some say he really does have some powers that he obviously uses for exploit of himself and his own glory. I think Jesus did great things and was humble giving praise to God not self. He said he was Gods son.
anamasteos 1 month ago
@shinsplints101 if there is no god then why do people like you spend so much time trying to convince us there is not? why do you care and most definatly wast your time?
johninitforfun 1 day ago
rev:22.19 if anyone takes anything away from the prophetic words of this book,god will take away from him his share of the fruit of tree of life and of the holy city which are described in this book... tanx for the alert... Hapi nw yr 2012 evri1... :)
gr8ebi 1 month ago
Not to worry. They who choose the losing side in a predetermined outcome, are complete morons and will only regret their doings in the swimmingpool of fire and pain. Good riddance!
antiazazel 1 month ago
the kjv is not the original manuscripts. kjv actually added some verses that are not in the manuscripts original. forget the niv. read the holmans or the nasb
SpcMedia21 1 month ago
yes they are wolves in sheep's clothing
demonsmasher2 1 month ago
Good Job, Thank you for showing the Truth
sherlyjasmin 1 month ago
NASB is thought by some to be more accurate than the KJV. The NIV is smoother reading, and Hank Hannigraf thinks it the most accurate thought for thought translation. The real text is in Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic (Mark), not English. The KJV has elements of the Vulgate which could introduce inaccuracy (or maybe not). Get an interlinear to see what the real NT version says. My Interlinear NT has Greek, the equivalent English words under the Greek words, the NIV and the KJV all together...
357MagnumBob 1 month ago
Nothing has come from the "modern versions" since 1881 but confusion and error, but no one in 400 years has ever proven any linguistic of historical fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in fully legible English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world--just as Koine Greek was during the Apostolic Era.
"The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times" (Psalm 12:6).
jjpetkusiii 2 months ago
Those verses that were taken out in the NIV are in bracket in the KJV. Have you wondered why that is so , before you jump to conclusion? If you love the KJV so much, perhaps you should ask them to take away the brackets.
murtadmurtad 2 months ago
Very well done. I was shocked to hear that the publishers of the NIV and the Satanic Bible are one and the same and that they took out the most important part of the Lord's prayer in thy kingdom come thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Sounds to me like the work of some low life scumbag devil and his loser followers.
VitoBandito1 2 months ago
NASB is actually a closer translation than KJV, i think it's NLT is suppose to be quite close aswell.
TheUltimateRampage94 2 months ago
@TheUltimateRampage94 The NASB is the most accurate translation, but accurately based on CORRUPT texts. It is based on the Westcott and Hort text who were proven to be occultists. The text is derived from the corrupt Alexandrian manuscripts & Sinaiticus which was found in a trash can. The KJV text is based on the Textus Receptus which represents 95% of all known manuscripts. Satan is responsible for all the different translations we have today.
PropheticVindicator 1 month ago
I found this out by reading the chick track called "The attack." You can read it online as well as "The Godfathers". It is in the footnotes, but one reads thinking they are reading the whole word of God. They are not noticing that versus skip. It is wrong. The NIV and other translations were written by the Catholic Church. Go to chick.com and look up Catholicism and then go to the Alberto Rivera series. They were the start of WWI and WWI and the Holocost. Read the truth and dont be deceived.
lovecross1 2 months ago
now you ask what was the rich man and Lazarus really about? the rich man was a symbol of Isreal, after all his father was Abraham, Lazarus had sores on his body. what do sores symbolize in the bible? Sin. he was covered from head to toe in them. he was begging for crumbs. the rich man had all he could eat. this is taking the bible for granted... the poor man cherished every crumb. the rich man had need of nothing. Jesus was a beggar! he took sin of the whole world on himself. Beggars will live.
IndigoPriest 2 months ago
as for the translation of hell, Sheol literally means grave. so this translation is correct. king Solomon says "the dead know nothing" king David says "the dead praise not the lord" now either king David was lying or confused, or.... modern belief about heaven and hell are wrong. my grandma is not up in heaven or burning in hell, she is in the grave. just like everyone else. but what about "the rich man and Lazarus"? it was a parable... what about the thief on the cross? no commas in Greek...
IndigoPriest 2 months ago
@IndigoPriest
The rich man and Lazarus was NOT a parable. No parable uses proper names. This was a historical account. Further, Jesus only ever sided with the Pharisees one time, and that was against the Saducees regarding this very topic. How else can one interpret Lu 13:22-29? Finally, your Grandmother - her body is in the Grave, where is her spirit? Not in the Grave! The texts from David and Solomon may well refer to corpses. Certainly corpses, "the dead," in the grave don't think or speak.
357MagnumBob 1 month ago
@357MagnumBob i m sorry if i stired up anger. this was not my intent. i was mearly saying what my parents raised me to believe. people in my church have told me that spirit translates to breath and that it returns to god when we die. i could be wrong about this. but in my mind it makes sense. i looked at lu 13 22-29 and the only thing that pops to my mind is the phrase i do not know you. in Jeremiah 22:16 it explains what it is to know the lord.
IndigoPriest 1 month ago
@357MagnumBob forgive me but i am not an expert in the bible, but i try hard :) this text from Jeremiah and luke would indicate that many people will come to the door of heaven requesting to be let in on the basis of prophecy in the name of the lord. however jeremiah indicates that those who are let in defend the poor. so what you and i do here on youtube, explaining the scriptures to one another is useless if we don't go to the poor and feed them real food. and clothe them.
IndigoPriest 1 month ago
the bright morning star refers to Christ, however Lucifer once held the same position in heaven as Jesus as arch-angel. that is why in Issiah talks of the light that fell from heaven. obviously Satan. previously known as Lucifer. the translation is correct, however it can cause confusion for someone who only reads the surface of the words and does not compare scripture to scripture.
IndigoPriest 2 months ago
yes i agree that the translation of morning star can be confuseing. that is why the kjv is so vital. however take all the translations into account before splitting hairs. if you study the bible closely, Jesus and lucifer had the same job in heaven. archangels. the ones who cover. i know it is controversial. but study it. micheal and angel of the lord are the same. the dead in christ shall rise at the shout of the arch-angel. lucifer means light bearer, his name was changed to "the accuser"
IndigoPriest 2 months ago
(correction:) "deleted BY its publishers"
Fryitonapanandstuff 2 months ago
Wow, absolutely true! I checked the accuracy of your findings with a copy of a New World scriptural translation. Every passage that you listed really had been deleted its publishers! What's up with THAT???? Indeed, Satan works through trickery. In this case, an omission is a lie. God bless, and may you be protected by His angels. (I'm outta that, too.)
Fryitonapanandstuff 2 months ago
Jesus was NOT called the moring star! That is satan name in the Bible! There's also over 900 hundred verses they remove from NIV, so this means if you want the truth read the KJV!
God Bless!
busaboo 2 months ago
Hey, King James was no saint. Would God attach his "true word" to a sinner.
DeDona1 2 months ago
shocking. im gobsmacked.
cherrydog9 2 months ago
Please check out Mark Woodman's Christian Deceptions from his series (God's Final Call)
GospelofJohn8vs32 2 months ago
Footnotes of the missing verses are found at the bottom of the NIV. We have bothe KJV and NIV at home and does not depend only one version. what is important is you learn to hear the voice of the Holy Spirit and know what is of the Lord and what is not. Why be afraid of deception if you have to Holy Spirit to lead you into ALL TRUTH? God knows who truly belongs to Him and will not allow us to fall if our hearts are after Him. God bless us all!!1
eagle012061 2 months ago
Fuck me get a life
dogooo50 2 months ago
@dogooo50 we have buddy, and what a life! Praise God.
oscar45515 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The name "Lucifer" actually MEANS "son of the morning", or MORNING STAR, goddammit, so THERE, goddammit! You're sincere... but your asshole is SINCERELY WRONG, godfuckingdammit, goddammit, GODFUCKHISASS!!!
It's sincerey wrong Christians like y'all that make me curse the throne God fucknig sits on, goddammit! Threatening men with eternal damnation and fucking getting His facts fucked-up wrong, goddammit!
WildManChrisVEVO 2 months ago
@WildManChrisV
ROCK9388 2 months ago
Naw, naw, NAW, godfuckingdammit! Those parts the NIV leaves out were NOT FOUND in the EARLIEST MANUSCRIPTS from which we get our Bible today, goddammit!!! I John 5:7 was added by later translators to make the text run smoothly. Ever see those italicized words in your Kings Jaes Version, goddammit? Same with them too!
Damn! God's poor deceived children!!!
WHY doesn't God keep His fucking shit together IF He is REALLY FUCKING aLL-KNOWING AND aLL-POWERFUL, goddammit!
WildManChrisVEVO 2 months ago
i didnt watch it full so lucky mke
Megalovemusicgirl 2 months ago
That's what happened when Westcott & Hort helped to corrupt the newer translations from the Alexandrian Egyptian Texts. The KJV was translated from the Antioch Texts. Zondervan is owned by Harper-Collins now. Yes, they are the ones that published the satanic bible. Get the book, "Look What's Missing".
2bless8 2 months ago
PERSONALLY I PREFER THE NKJV OR THE KJV, BUT I HAVE READ THE NIV, AND I HAVE NOTICED MISSING VERSES BUT I FOUND OUT THAT SINCE THE ORIGINAL BIBLE OR THE SCROLLS WERE NOT DONE IN VERSES THEY CAME IN ONE LUMB TO PUT IT THAT WAY, SO THEY THEY TRANSLATED IT IN ENGLISH IT WAS MADE INTO VERSES, AND PUNCTUATION WAS ADDED, HEBREW HAS NO PUNCTUATION. ALSO CHECK IN THE NKJV IN ISAIAH 14: 12 IN THE WORD LUCIFER HAS A ( I ) ON TOP OF IT, LOOK IN THE COLUMN IT SAIS LIT. DAY STAR, BECAUSE HE WAS A STAR
PATREND62 2 months ago
certain words and meanings of words where lost in translation from hebrew and ancient greek, both very meaningfull languages...!
ulsterscothosy 2 months ago
Doesnt really matter. Religion is man made. So there is no way it isnt corrupt. Jesus is the way.
Killuminati!!!
Illuminati3000Guru 2 months ago
@Illuminati3000Guru go google 'the daniel project'.. then come back.. ;)
ulsterscothosy 2 months ago
@ulsterscothosy i honestly dont have time for that. I have a revolution to start, but if you want to explain what it is you have my full attention.
Illuminati3000Guru 2 months ago
@Illuminati3000Guru LOL!
Supergear100 2 months ago
I am definitely concerned about the "Morning Star" illusion you mentioned and that the publishers also published the satanic bible. I must state that in the NIV bible that I have, there are notes at the bottom of the page which has any removed passages. In regards to the lords prayer, I was brought up a catholic and never heard the "for thyne is the kingdom...." ending to the lords prayer as this is only in the King James version and no other version of the bible. (not to say that it's wrong).
shaw4991 2 months ago
I got a better idea..just get rid off every religious text/scriputure permanently off the face of the earth and all problems will start to get solve as we can being to focus on things that really matter and are affecting our world like war, hunger, and the federal reserve bank...
fanomunoz 2 months ago
Other versions like NLT and Today's English have almost the same discrepancies!! BE CAREFUL!
jokymz 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
[Please read my previous post FIRST]
By the way notice that in Revelations 22:16 NIV, the "Morning Star" (Jesus) was in capital letters, different from the "morning star" in Isaiah 14:12 NIV.
The part on Jesus telling the disciples some demons would not come out by prayer and fasting (Matthew 17:21) , was also in the NIV footnote. THEY ARE ALL IN THE FOOTNOTE. So dont make too much fuss. Thanks for pointing out anyway
unholydanger 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
Comment removed
unholydanger 2 months ago
I did researches on these differences, during the translation for KJV version, "Lucifer" was the name of a bright star in the sky at that time. Why they used it probably because people that time knew what "Lucifer" meant. That was why the "morning star" was used in Isaiah 14:12 NIV. And all the verses you mentioned that NIV took out in Matthew 6:9-13 , 1 John 5:7-8, Acts 8:35-38, THEY ARE ALL THERE IN NIV version FOOTNOTE!! And yes I DO READ FOOTNOTES when I read the NIV. Please take note GUYS!
unholydanger 2 months ago
@unholydanger
Footnotes are not Scripture. All Scripture is inspired; not footnotes. Footnotes are what the translators thought, not what God knows. The King James translators only set cross-references in the margins, no extra thoughts. The Holy Ghost should lead you through Scripture and thought, not translators.
DinoDude65 2 months ago
@DinoDude65 please get yourself a copy of NIV and turn to the missing verses mentioned in this video. They are ALL in the footnotes EXACTLY as they were in KJV, EXACT VERSES. They are not what the translators thought. THey are as exactly what was written in KJV.
unholydanger 2 months ago
@unholydanger
But the fact that they removed them from Scripture, denoting them with the infamous "The most reliable manuscripts..." They're using corrupted manuscripts to "correct" the King James version. And if the footnotes are just as in the KJV, why even read a NIV? What's wrong with the KJV? If it's readability, then your sorely mistaken. The KJV ranked at a fifth grade reading level on the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level, whereas the NIV was eighth.
DinoDude65 2 months ago
@DinoDude65 Everytime a version is copied by hand, errors were certain to be made. The KJV would probably contain translation errors too. Revised versions were published because the English language grew and changed through the centuries. Moreover, an older and better Greek text than the one used for KJV came to light in newly-discovered ancient manuscripts. I am not saying NIV is better than KJV but that NIV did not really "removed" the verses and not as corrupted as you guys believed it to be.
unholydanger 2 months ago
They did not make mistakes, they wrote it that way on purpose....NIV= Deception
LastDayStudios 2 months ago
Great video. Thanks
blackthorn1975 2 months ago
new international new international eeee i cant talk version sad statement
rjhgmail 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Religious belief is a mental illness. A contagious one.
Too stupid for science? Try religion.
kriss299 2 months ago
@kriss299
No one is talking about religion. We're talking about the Bible: a historical document. Nearly everything (except Revelation of course) has been confirmed by secular science. Long before secular historians knew about the Hittite empire, the Bible mentioned them. Eventually, some remains in the Middle east were found that suggested the existence of the Hittites. There is not one unproved statement in the Holy Bible. Except Revelation, again, it's prophecy.
DinoDude65 2 months ago
@DinoDude65 If anything is religious, it's humanism, which places man as god. Just as the serpent told Eve, that if she ate the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, she could be like God.
DinoDude65 2 months ago
@DinoDude65 [please read my previous reply first] by the way, KJV was not the first translation. WHY THERE WERE FOOTNOTES IN NIV? Because there were thousands of translation variations made that most were unimportant. The "missing verses" mentioned in this video, were in the NIV FOOTNOTES because they were regarded IMPORTANT variants of translation not to be missed, but they were one of the translation variant.
unholydanger 2 months ago
The difference between a "Version" and a "Translation" is striking. If you are unaware you might want to investigate. Translations will always be more accurate. A version on the other hand will always carry more of a bent towards the translators own prejudiced bents. Of course because the way language is there can be no pure translation of the Holy Scriptures into any language. A good translation will be as literal as possible, and take little liberties when unable to literally translate.
TomasManso 2 months ago
I'm sitting in the same boat, in some portions of this. I see some problems with the NIV. Most of it really does come down to the different texts it was translated from. But yes, there is much I do not like about it. But at the same time, there's some serious blowing out of proportion and lack of wisdom or scholarship from the KJV only community. I'm not going to sit back and completely say you are wrong on everything though.
AjRobinsonUg 2 months ago
Christian videos ...
xXterjooXx 2 months ago
Eye opener! I'm out on the NIV too!
marines13r 2 months ago
Im shocked !!
russca 2 months ago
In the Book of MARK The NIV removed enough verses to make Mark have exactly 666 verses.
All of the newer versions are corrupt. The New King James version has a Satanic symbol on the cover. a 666 right on the cover hidden in a symbol.
Ajaxmax 2 months ago
WOW! THAT'S WHAT I'VE BEEN COMPLAINING ABOUT ALL ALONG. THE NIV NOT ONLY OMITS SEVERAL SCRIPTURES, BUT ALSO COMPLETELY CHANGES SCRIPTURES; SUCH AS PSALMS 136-- HIS LOVE ENDURES FOREVER INSTEAD OF HIS MERCY ENDURES FOREVER. LOVE INSTEAD OF CHARITY. JEREMIAH 29--11 IS COMPLETELY CHANGED. ETC.ETC. READ THE BOOK OF PROVERBS FOR EXAMPLE. I HAVE A PARALLEL BIBLE WITH 8 DIFFERENT VERSIONS SIDE BY SIDE, AND THEY ARE OBVIOUSLY TEACHING ANOTHER GOSPEL. GOD RICHLY BLESS YOU AND BLESS YOU FOR SHARING.
ROMANWABLE 2 months ago
you realize that the passages that "are taken out" were actually put in because the NIV is using an older original text for its source to translate? Don't do research comparing NIV to KJV learn greek and hebrew and do research comparing NIV and KJV to the oldest known texts.
Zondervan does not publish the satanist Bible... its parent company is HarperCollins and HarperCollins has another daughter company that publishes a book called "The Satanists Bible."
UthPastor4Life 2 months ago 3
A talking snake ? Noahs Ark ? Adam and Eve ? Just some of the incorrect things in the Buy Bull.
MrJohnnyrace 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For the intentions, powers and strategies the devil and his demons use to deceive, oppress, possess and destroy, for beliefs and practices that open doors for demons to enter into a person’s life and the complete way of deliverance from curses, evil forces and demons, see the spiritual warfare book “Demons Behind Doors” (available on Amazon)
heartandsoul3306 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
KJV is the only Bible in my world !! Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven ..
lisareidmitchell 3 months ago
I am glad you are not against KJV people anymore. I have done this research also and that is the reason I stick with the KVJ. I have and do read other versions for comparison, but there is something about the KVJ that allows you to remember verses. It is not a "perfect" book (don't make an idol out of it), but it is the best thing we have. I have several different versions for the sake of research and comparison. Glad you are not against us anymore, people who choose to stick with the KJV. :-)
BeThouFaithful 3 months ago
I don't care for the NIV myself, but let's be honest and fair here. No they don't use the word somomite,, they use the word Homosexual.
jlwohio 3 months ago
In many ways it seems we have been tricked into worshiping a false god..sun god.. Lucifer. Start with the sabbath which should be Saturday but it was all changed way back by the Romans to Sunday. So many things seem wrong in the churches I have been in. You are on the right track ..keep thinkin like that and dont stop looking for the truth
keensweep 3 months ago
The new scribes are worse then the first offenders..I favor the King James Bible above all others.
YAHUSHUA2011 3 months ago