Michael Badnarik's Constitution Class 2 of 43

[1we7the8people6]

Thank you Michael Badnarik's I'm from Texas and I love seeing that were on the right TRACK headed the right way with sharing this Information

[foxlake02]

This is bullshit. You can declare your "constitutional rights" and not mean they are granted but simply explained and enumerated by the constitution. There is no contradiction in terms here. You can not, however, do whatever you want on your own property. You can not pollute it, kill game on it out of season, kill endangered species on it and quite a few other restrictions. Eminent domain laws allow the government to take your properly if you are compensated for it.

[EatMyDuck84]

Ron Paul would endorse this

[3888799]

So i liked raised my hand on the 4th of july question =( smh at me

[bneyens]

Ok, law of property is the most important law and we have to act like a 2 year old to defend it, got it. Please answer this scenario for me. Lets say I live in a neighborhood with a bunch of nice houses in it, which I do. Lets say my neighbor paints his house bright pink. A bright pink house would have most likely have the negative impact of lowering the value of EVERYONE'S PRIVATE property. Is that fair that everyone's private property was devalued by one person acting like a 2 year old?

[bneyens]

@bneyens Actually he addresses this at the end of the 5th video. Your rights are balanced against the rights of others.

[stpthreat1]

@bneyens Why would that affect the value of the properties around it? potential new owners could just paint it.

[zilla2033]

@bneyens The only change to that one house is the changing of the color of the house. I (and many others that have matured into adults) would say that the lowering of others' property value is the result of people acting like 2 year olds thinking that the color of one house made nearby houses function any less as a house than they did before that singular house was painted pink. Their function as neighboring houses didn't change outside of the heads of immature 2 year olds.

[bneyens]

@zilla2033 You are missing the point. I agree with you that the function of your neighbors house remains completely unchanged. But lets use this as a more extreme example. Lets say your neighbor builds a nuclear power plant next to your house. Your house is technically unchanged, but there are fewer people who want to live next to a nuclear power plant. Fewer buyers means lower purchase price. Lower price means lost money for the owner. Your value is diminished by your neighbors actions.

[zilla2033]

@bneyens Actually.....that's a really good example. Kind of an unrealistic one, but still, very good point!

[bneyens]

In theory, Zilla is correct. However, PERCEPTION IS REALITY. Covenants deal with issues that have been directly linked to reducing property value. If you want a pink house, or 10 broken down cars in your yard, that is perfectly ok if you can afford enough property so it doesn't effect others. Covenant communities are generally for smaller land owners where one persons actions directly effect others.

[TruthSmack]

This is a very good start. I like how you build this up from the foundation. !

[SurrealMarksman]

People shoudn't be afraid of their government; government should be afraid of its people.

[gintherlover]

We must stop yammering about "rights" and theories. The natural law is simple, you have rights and responsibilities you were born with and cannot get out of. We all know what they are. But the gov't has the guns and the control of people's opinions. With those powers, you stand little chance. When an armed burglar is robbing you, do you lecture him on your rights not to be robbed? The evil care not for your rights. You need more power. Power is in numbers.

[avapplication]

How does one establish ownership of property?

[attorneyskillforjew]

@avapplication The land patent does. Look up how to secure a land patent. or visit 1215 org

[broadcastmyass4u]

@BearWa11ace go away stupid, you not helping

[ivorbigonee]

@BearWa11ace fool

[solimiansky]

thank u for this posting!

[longfootbuddy]

they signed the declaration of indepedence on my birthday

[etzel33]

Ownership of land is different than ownership of products. Title is recognized and enforced by government. Also, original ownership is by force and not by "production". Your right to exclude others from trespass isn't inherent to your being, it is a claim of privilege.

[lefrebure]

Is it just me or does this guy sound just like Kevin Costner! Close you eyes and listen. The only problem with property is that in the US you cannot own land. If you could you would not have to pay real estate taxes on it. Which is why we as people are told we have to pay income tax because we are not the owners of our own bodies. Funny how Americans have been duped into believing we are free when were are really just at "liberty" to do certain things.

[xxDogsoldierxx]

Does anyone know where he gets the definition of "right" from?

[jerrod24]

This series needs to be televised.

[MrWashingtons]

keep this videos here on youtube for future viewers

thanks

[vikingscool]

watch?v=j3UULJqVFMU

He suffered heart attack, he is in the hospital.

he has been in serious condition. You NEED to pray for him and his families. He is in my prayers.

[MrKyle588]

Mike is right and he touches on a lot of things that are really cool and not taught. He does go into some organic constitution. There are some other problems with the present constitution that is address, not sure why , perhaps he will have another class for the things I have learned.

[unitedstatesdale]

How can I start a civil war ?

I have limited funds, Have any ideas ?

[godofallbums]

rob a casino :-))

[nilesmc]

the 'My body is my property concept' will be tested soon with the attempted forced vaccinations because of the fake H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic.

If you HAVE to take a vaccine then you don't own your own body, do you?

[boxa888]

massachusetts has already made plans for the H1N1 or other bio weapons, they can detain people without their consent and such forever if needed, its really bad, violates the whole constitution just like the patriot act! both are illegal. if we follow the constitution we will be fine! its getting scary, i work in an old age home and the old people are pissed what is going on! remember they kept us free during these world wars, so it bothers them that the senate is destroying the country!

[mzettley]

This concept was already tested with the War on Drugs so the government has already taken this away when the y arrest someone for having an illegal drug.

[nilesmc]

not only do 'our leaders' legislate what we can and cannot put into our own bodies, they force us to put shit into ourselves we DON'T WANT INSIDE OF US.

Ask Billy Best (ask me & I'll ask Billy personally). Ask Danny Hauser and his parents. It's not called the 'Cancer Industry' for nothing.

Ask yourself next month when the fake pandemic comes to town.

You will have to make a decision soon for you and your family. What will you do? Soon, you will find out just how 'free' you are.

[gintherlover]

@mzettley The powers that be are always testing to see if their propaganda is working. They have succeeded in the following steps toward domination: 1) create ignorance, done; 2) create complacency, done; 3) create fear, done; 4) create distraction, done; 5) create dependency, almost done, need to gain control of food production and the means to feed oneself independently (seeds & suitable soil).

[hitshiftrotate]

@gintherlover What about the creation of division? I think division is the biggest obstacle we face right now as a nation. What do you think?

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate Hi there. Your question is general. And as a general concept, division is key to conquest. So saith Sun Tzu and Napoleon Bonaparte. Whether originated from within the group, or introduced by a would-be conqueror of the group, the conqueror uses division to accomplish some very ideal ends: 1.) To fracture the enemy into smaller, weaker groups; 2.) To increase the possibility that in-fighting among the smaller groups will drain some of the enemies' resources, weakening them;

[hitshiftrotate]

@gintherlover I should have been more specific. I meant the interpersonal division kind. Thanks for your response though.

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate ...3.) To be able to attack smaller numbers of enemy at any one time. If you have 100 men; it is easier to conquer 10 groups of 10, one group at a time, rather than taking on the whole schmagilla all at once.

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate To get to your question more directly: I think some division is great. Like having smaller states that are part of a union. This sort of division is more of an administrative strategem aimed at better and more localized government balanced with central government. However, interpersonal divisions are detrimental. Racism, hatreds, prejudices, ethnocentrism, etc. ALL BAD. Muslim v. Christian, BAD. Itailians v. Irish, BAD, and so on.

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate I think this country is interesting because it is such a melting pot. But we must learn to live together as ONE PEOPLE, or better yet, a UNION OF PEOPLES. or we are doomed.

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate I will propound this one belief I have about our nation. And that is that regardless of what religion you practice, or what your lifestyle choices are, or what constitutionally secured rights you choose to exercise this week, our legal and political system is of English origin, and passed down to our republic and modified and altered to fit the mold of our republican system and supreme law, the constitution. If anyone has a problem with that, tough shit.

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate Oh, also, one more thing. I believe the world should never have a central government that governs us all. We should be and remain independent sovereign peoples that do not join in any pacts or alliances except in times of international war and only as permitted by international common law. There needs to be a central world government that has NO JURISDICTION over individuals but only over the intercourse of nations.And it should be modeled after the U.S. federal const.

[brandonayers]

@nilesmc While I certainly don't believe the government has the right to force you to vaccinate I think it's irresponsible not too. Calling the H1N1 virus fake is irresponsible. See watch?v=f-cKzzPkz2o and watch?v=W57pnVhEhjU

[nilesmc]

@brandonayers Bird Flu Hoax Pt. 1 watch?v=VLT0_xMeLjI

[jessebickeldotcom]

@nilesmc Yes, yes you do own your own body. Just because I'm violated with needles doesn't mean I don't own my body.

[nilesmc]

@jessebickeldotcom if, one day, someone from the government knocks on your door with a needle in his hand and 2 police officers by his side....

do you get the picture? you'll have a decision to make.

as Badnarik's famous for saying "My .45 makes a bigger hole than your syringe."

[0000infinity0000]

@nilesmc

The constitution does not guarantee you any right to get other people sick. You do not have the right to be the carrier of diseases. I don't see why you wouldn't want to take it. Why would you want to walk around at risk of contracting any kind of virus, or risk exposing other people to a virus/pathogen/infection you're carrying? You're just being stubborn.

[ChapmanGriffith]

thank you very much for these well needed forgotten lessons

[gryphonsss]

We need more videos like this on youtube and all other video outlets. The people need to wake up from the induced trance that we have been put into.

[wellbid23]

i enjoyed that, it was good.