9. Is Intelligent Design Viable?: William Lane Craig rebuttal

[IloveYOUviruses]

Ignorance, imagination, and 1/2 truths will always make blind evolution look plausible to some.

[davidsfriend01]

@IloveYOUviruses "Ignorance, imagination, and 1/2 truths will always make blind evolution look plausible to some." Evidence, observation and experimentation will always make the plausable seem plausable, no need for ignorance, imagination or half truths.

[masluxx]

is ID viable? No But ignorance and 1/2 truths will always make ID look plausible to some.

[yostevodotcom]

Wow.. Is it just me or is this guy who is not even a scientist thrashing the decorated Ayala at this point.

Dr. Ayala's first rebuttal could have been adequately dismembered by Dr. Craig's opening argument, and Craig doesn't miss the opportunity to point that out here.

[tuseroni]

i heard "kind" and that was all i needed to hear...

[bcn533]

As if you needed anything else, one thing that completely convicts Christianity of being a ridiculous cult is that it is anti-science to the core. An inescapable conclusion born out nicely by this video. I suspect the poster of this video will reply to me that I am laughably ignorant for not realizing that ID "theory" IS science. I think I would just let that comment stand.

[BeauLeeman]

@bcn533

Don't confuse ID with theological precepts. ID is a concept based on evidences of design. Its ultimate verification and/or falsification will be based on empical evidence, NOT scripture or faith based beliefs.

Dr. Craig is not an ID'st per se, and his arguments are mainly refutations of NDE. ID does use some of those same arguments however, like the 'extrapolation' conclusion of assuming radical species alterations being analogous to micro (adaptive) changes, but over vast time.

[flipporify]

9 by Design is best show ever, what I watched , but I watch it in HD at:

TVFLAP . COM

[questionsamson]

I Doubt William lane craig understands the basic components of evolution or common ancestry. Evolution is the foundation of modern biology.

[drcraigvideos]

@questionsamson - I doubt you even know what you're talking about. Dr. Craig doesn't think common ancestry poses as a problem for ID. There are ID proponents who accept micro and marcro evolution, genius. Please do more homework.

[drcraigvideos]

@Gplex Obviously, you haven't studied ID in the least. Michael Behe said loud and clear that micro and macro evolution do NOT pose a problem for ID. Do your thinking.

[Mentat1231]

@drcraigvideos

I was wondering: Could you recommend a few of the good books on ID?

[drcraigvideos]

@Mentat1231 Anything by Michael Behe and William Dembski. Those are good starts.

[dpmaldo]

@questionsamson This statement shows you know nothing about William Lane Craig

[allabasterkt]

Damn.

Dr Craig tore him a new one.