These videos are just poor - poor in taste, quality, acting, and so much more. Giles would tell you he's a Christian, but nothing in this video points to Christ, as is the case with 90% of the other videos on the Clash Videos channel.
It sounds like, if you found sea shells on the top of the Rocky Mountains, that people might revisit the Old Testament Biblical story "Noah's Ark" as a real possibility.
Do you people really believe that a global conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands of scientists from dozens of nations and backgrounds along with political figures from around the world is more plausible than the idea that decades of dumping millions of tons of pollution into the air, water, and soil is somehow bad for our environment?
A few stolen and quote-mined emails don't change the facts. I'd prefer to listen to the experts on this stuff instead of some youtube hacks.
pyrite12 said, " ... A few stolen and quote-mined emails don't change the facts. I'd prefer to listen to the experts on this stuff instead of some youtube hacks. ... "
That is not the only thing, pyrite.
The emails exposed fraud and doctoring of numbers and readings in order to perpetuate the fact, as they admitted themselves, that the evidence does not support their claims, and they intended to "trick" us by doctoring their information.
pyrite, denying to William that the doctored, emails did not reveal fraud of so-called Global Warming supportive so-called "scientists" said"
Quoting pyrite13, "No they don't. That's just your lackluster interpretation. ... "
Actually, that is exactly what those doctored emails exposed, pyrite! They exposed fraud, deceit, and a dogmatic, cult like fervor to cling to false beliefs no matter if it involves lying and changing the "evidence" to suit the agenda!
Actually, they don't. At least not to the extent you seem to imply. Sure, a few researchers may have done something a bit shady here or there...but to leap to the conclusion of a grand conspiracy is just paranoid ignorance.
pyrite told William "Furthermore, if you want to refute the evidence put forth by climate scientists, how about you conduct your own research that supports your position. ... "
pyrite,
You lecture me without knowing my background. That is a typical behavior of Global Warming cultists-dogmatists. I've observed the same arrogance from induced abortion supporters and Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research cultists who don't know the real science and push false, fabricated science.
I don't give a damn about your background, only what you can prove. You could be the Duke of Hazzard or Captain Crunch himself. Unless you have evidence to back up your claims you are just another conspiracy theorist like the 9/11 truthers, the birthers, scientologists, and that guy who thinks the lizard people are taking over.
@pyrite13 Mountains of evidence? You read it all? More importantly, you can tell what is fact and what is fiction? Did you live through 1970's ice age? I survived it, it made for great snowmobiling. John Coleman and 30,000 scientist disagree with yours, now what?
That's all you have? One graph to be interpreted in a vacuum by a layman? You want to refute thousands of experts from dozens of countries using multiple scientific disciplines with ONE GRAPH and no context?
It simply does nothing to address the fact that greenhouse gasses are on the rise and have a real, measurable effect on climate. It does not refute the fact that the current warming trend will continue to rise so long as conditions remain unchanged.
that it takes just one volcanic eruption in one day to equal the same out put of a refinery plant after 25 years in business.We getting it up the ass pyrite.
And their not done.you see no matter what side your on ..were getting equal penetration
Your "fact" is without citation and is barely a coherent statement.
What kind of refinery plant are you referring to? What size volcano? What type of ejected material are you comparing? All of these (and a dozen other) factors affect the truth of your statement.
But what does any of that have to do with the topic at hand? I am, however, sorry to hear about your 'penetration' problem. Have you tried a soothing cream to relieve the discomfort?
Doug, it took me a few mintues to connect the dots, you are Hannah's dad. (Hannah helped to expose ACORN). Great job on the video and how you raised you kids !! Keep up the good work !!!
The Green Sheep forgot to buy beach front property in Arizona, and now that the sea is going to rise over their homes on the left coast, they need Al to sell them more carbon credits so they can run their diesel yachts for the first time!
What r d Environmental Marxists going to do now, that they have been exposed? No matter what happens they will keep on BELIEVEING. D Reason that they now call their Believe Climate Change, form Climate Warming, Greenhouse, Acid Rain, Planet Cooling, Ice Age is that d Climate Apocalypse can CHANGE but they can go on BELIEVING.
These videos are just poor - poor in taste, quality, acting, and so much more. Giles would tell you he's a Christian, but nothing in this video points to Christ, as is the case with 90% of the other videos on the Clash Videos channel.
drubarlow 5 months ago
Doug Giles is on so much crack. And his daughter will sink to hell under the weight of all the poor people she has turned onto the street.
What a depraved hoe-bag.
VeritasVerificatrion 1 year ago
Climatology...awesome reference for the climate change religion. I think Gore should be executed for treason.
MyGrassroots 2 years ago 2
justtopissuroff,
It sounds like, if you found sea shells on the top of the Rocky Mountains, that people might revisit the Old Testament Biblical story "Noah's Ark" as a real possibility.
WilliamHW 2 years ago
Doug,
That was enjoyable!
I had a good laugh.
Thanks for posting.
I can already see the Dogmatic Cultists posting their diatribes here, reprimanding non-believers.
Their lie has been exposed, yet they still scream "Heresy! You non-believers! It is true! Don't you believe us? You SHOULD BELIEVE US?"
WilliamHW 2 years ago
Do you people really believe that a global conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands of scientists from dozens of nations and backgrounds along with political figures from around the world is more plausible than the idea that decades of dumping millions of tons of pollution into the air, water, and soil is somehow bad for our environment?
A few stolen and quote-mined emails don't change the facts. I'd prefer to listen to the experts on this stuff instead of some youtube hacks.
pyrite13 2 years ago
pyrite12 said, " ... A few stolen and quote-mined emails don't change the facts. I'd prefer to listen to the experts on this stuff instead of some youtube hacks. ... "
That is not the only thing, pyrite.
The emails exposed fraud and doctoring of numbers and readings in order to perpetuate the fact, as they admitted themselves, that the evidence does not support their claims, and they intended to "trick" us by doctoring their information.
Please don't piss on me and tell me its raining!
WilliamHW 2 years ago
No they don't. That's just your lackluster interpretation. Here are a couple of videos from someone who actually did some research.
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=uXesBhYwdRo
The word of the day is "context". Look it up before cherry picking a few lines from random emails.
pyrite13 2 years ago
pyrite, denying to William that the doctored, emails did not reveal fraud of so-called Global Warming supportive so-called "scientists" said"
Quoting pyrite13, "No they don't. That's just your lackluster interpretation. ... "
Actually, that is exactly what those doctored emails exposed, pyrite! They exposed fraud, deceit, and a dogmatic, cult like fervor to cling to false beliefs no matter if it involves lying and changing the "evidence" to suit the agenda!
WilliamHW 2 years ago
Actually, they don't. At least not to the extent you seem to imply. Sure, a few researchers may have done something a bit shady here or there...but to leap to the conclusion of a grand conspiracy is just paranoid ignorance.
pyrite13 2 years ago
Furthermore, if you want to refute the evidence put forth by climate scientists, how about you conduct your own research that supports your position.
Saying...."See, they used the words 'trick' and 'hide' so they must all be liars!"....is not a valid argument.
Show me that data that refutes the mountains of evidence illustrating the effect of industrialization on our environment.
pyrite13 2 years ago
pyrite told William "Furthermore, if you want to refute the evidence put forth by climate scientists, how about you conduct your own research that supports your position. ... "
pyrite,
You lecture me without knowing my background. That is a typical behavior of Global Warming cultists-dogmatists. I've observed the same arrogance from induced abortion supporters and Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research cultists who don't know the real science and push false, fabricated science.
WilliamHW 2 years ago
I guess that's a "no" on the evidence?
I don't give a damn about your background, only what you can prove. You could be the Duke of Hazzard or Captain Crunch himself. Unless you have evidence to back up your claims you are just another conspiracy theorist like the 9/11 truthers, the birthers, scientologists, and that guy who thinks the lizard people are taking over.
pyrite13 2 years ago
@pyrite13 Mountains of evidence? You read it all? More importantly, you can tell what is fact and what is fiction? Did you live through 1970's ice age? I survived it, it made for great snowmobiling. John Coleman and 30,000 scientist disagree with yours, now what?
goffnett 2 years ago
Just Google GREENLAND HOCKEY STICKS . See the Data for yourself.
uboat21 1 year ago
That's all you have? One graph to be interpreted in a vacuum by a layman? You want to refute thousands of experts from dozens of countries using multiple scientific disciplines with ONE GRAPH and no context?
It simply does nothing to address the fact that greenhouse gasses are on the rise and have a real, measurable effect on climate. It does not refute the fact that the current warming trend will continue to rise so long as conditions remain unchanged.
pyrite13 1 year ago
You may as well be saying "See, it snowed in New York. That means no climate change!"
pyrite13 1 year ago
Do you believe this fact:
that it takes just one volcanic eruption in one day to equal the same out put of a refinery plant after 25 years in business.We getting it up the ass pyrite.
And their not done.you see no matter what side your on ..were getting equal penetration
harleypiper 2 years ago
Your "fact" is without citation and is barely a coherent statement.
What kind of refinery plant are you referring to? What size volcano? What type of ejected material are you comparing? All of these (and a dozen other) factors affect the truth of your statement.
But what does any of that have to do with the topic at hand? I am, however, sorry to hear about your 'penetration' problem. Have you tried a soothing cream to relieve the discomfort?
pyrite13 2 years ago
Doug, it took me a few mintues to connect the dots, you are Hannah's dad. (Hannah helped to expose ACORN). Great job on the video and how you raised you kids !! Keep up the good work !!!
GrandmaBillie 2 years ago
The Green Sheep forgot to buy beach front property in Arizona, and now that the sea is going to rise over their homes on the left coast, they need Al to sell them more carbon credits so they can run their diesel yachts for the first time!
Wildkkat1 2 years ago
Google: "CLIMATE CHANGE IS NATURAL: 100 REASONS WHY"
Lots of ammo to use when shooting down Chicken Little. =^[.]^=
Raycheetah 2 years ago
Jail for the hoaxers.
I would love to see Maddoff versus Gore in cell block C
cajunstrat 2 years ago
Yeah it did suck ... wanting to believe in something so much that I ignored all facts and put my logic aside..
Glad Im over that episode in my life! Let the truth reign now and forever.
AGW = worst scientific fraud in all history
toshzpelta 2 years ago 2
Damn, if only YouTube allowed for SIX stars...
DocFarmer 2 years ago
What r d Environmental Marxists going to do now, that they have been exposed? No matter what happens they will keep on BELIEVEING. D Reason that they now call their Believe Climate Change, form Climate Warming, Greenhouse, Acid Rain, Planet Cooling, Ice Age is that d Climate Apocalypse can CHANGE but they can go on BELIEVING.
TiwazSchneider 2 years ago 2
LOVE IT!!!!
keepitwildtv 2 years ago
Great Video Keep Up the Great Work!!!!!!
brosin 2 years ago 3
You sir, are correct!
1islandcowboy 2 years ago 3
Good Job!!
ibbetsonusa 2 years ago 3
That was excellent.
5 stars..
Peace
truefictions 2 years ago 2
LOL !! Awesome again my friend!!
superdave492 2 years ago 2