Added: 5 years ago
From: fitzbone
Views: 184,125
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (452)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOL, I dont think you can blow it out!

    Maybe thats why they tell you to not get back into your car then come back out to finish pumping gas?

  • i was just hoping she would get naked.

  • BIMBO , BUT I WANNA CUM ON HER FACE

  • knob

  • Why did you lie in the title of your video?

  • At 1:05 i think she tried to blow it out. Thats incredible.

  • Looks like a static discharge from her rubbing her sweater right before ignition.

  • damn i do see the jet for a split second before it burst into flames. awesome vid ! thumbs up !

  • lol she just runs away and leaves it burning in a petrol station were the thing burning is connected to all the feul in the place lol

  • Ima compare your mothers face hitting my dick to 9/11 hows that

  • I can't believe how stupid some people are in real life, I yelled at a couple of teenagers because they were smoking cigarettes and pumping gas. Sheesh

  • @MsHoppytoad Stupid? How was she being stupid?? Never get back into your car while pumping gas....gimme a break. How many thousands of times do you think people get back into their car, or rubs their sweaters, or even light a cigarette without anything happening. She was just unlucky. Its pretty ridiculous to call this woman "incredibly stupid" for taking a seat for a moment while waiting for her gas to pump.

  • @jakedizle agreed. just an incredible set of circumstances. I didn't see anything stupid. In fact..I thought she had balls and exercised a bit of brains when she removed it from the car an laid it on the ground away from anything else flammable. How was this stupid. I think she did everything right.

  • @jakedizle

    Her mother was stupid for not teaching her that gas fumes can ignite, and that sparks can ignite shit too.

    Come to think of it, my parents didn't teach me that either. Maybe stupid is a strong word. :-)

  • Flag this.

  • Incredibly stupid woman, never get back into your car when you are pumping gas. A spark from sliding back into the car and from closing and opening the car door can cause the gas to start on fire. Think woman, think.

  • @MsHoppytoad At least she did the right thing. Most people don't shut the nozzle off before pulling it out, only making it worse. I think this was the best case scenario.

  • German snitchers are following me on youtube immediately flagging my posts.

    My brother Markus Bott had been tortured and was assassinated by the German BND which is the renamed GESTAPO. Germany is exactly the NAZI state as it is seen by many people. That is even evident from the fact that no criticism is allowed by German snitchers.

    Check out my channel and homepage on the technologies used by the German secret services.

    Martin Bott

  • This is proof that a rocket and/or space lazer beam hit the pentagon. The cover up runs so deep, and the betrayal we should all feel from this dark government is off the DAMN CHARTS! Popular media turns away from obvious evidence such as this, because they are protecting the government in exchange for money and Ipads. Release the confiscated tapes to us! Since we have come up with all these truths, you owe it to us to reveal your private videos. Fitzbone, Your mom should have miscarried

  • @buffyrich rocket, and/or space lazer... That just proves that you're to stupid to realize how retarded you just sounded... I mean space lazer? we don't even have that technology yet! let alone in 2001. >.> A rocket? where the fuck did this rocket come from? how did it strike down lamp posts and move a generator without detonation? this kind of technology in which a rocket does not detonate until it hits it's target and moves around knocking down lamp posts isn't even developed yet either!

  • I bet she was usuing her mobile phone, the thick idiot. They say don't use a mobile phone at a filling station/

  • Why would anybody just leave the pump in and go away?

  • was it static that set the fire? lol I would hope in and save the jeep!

  • @mogimuss yeah, they say if you leave the pump, touch something to release the static charge before you touch it again. otherwise a fire may start

  • Static energy owns her.

  • conspiracycracy com is the best site to learn and inform yourself of all the known conspiracy theories. Are they "FACT" OR "FICTION"? Many real researches such as Anthony J. Hilder, Jordan Maxwell, Michael Tsarion, and many more only at conspiracycrazy com

  • I can't believe she actually bothered taking the nozzle out. I would have just bailed.

  • Attention seeking vid on something so tragic is criminal

  • thats a gas staton no? The pentagon would have had state of the art cameras all around it..

    Amazing theyve never realeased a single vid clearly showing a plane hitting to debunk truthers at a single stroke.

    Maybe the seized footage doest support the offiicial story? Thats why its suppressed.

  • @zenoist2 They've never shown high-quality footage of the moon landing, either, leading conspiracy theorists to believe the entire thing was fake. Regardless, the moon landing has been proven true. Do you actually feel entitled to all the high-quality video that comes out of the capital or what?

  • Jeep!

    ftw

  • Wht does this have to do with the pentagon or flight 77? It makes a point that the off site camras are not focused upon the pentagon so they picked up the impact in the backgroind say where the white pole is could you see the guy waking past.

  • Another thing that truthers don't understand not a single civilian camra may be aimed at the pentagon 24-7 365 because od security concerns.

  • stupid girl , you shouldnt take the nozle out

  • You've got to hand it to the government sheep. Despite concealing evidence, lying, manipulating the 9-11 commission which didn't mention WTC7's very strange collapse, they still carry an air of arrogance.

    .

    There's one problem. As certain people get older they will tell the truth. Vietnam and everything has been exposed that way. We persist, those in the know can't keep their secrets because of the guilt of all those deaths they caused.

    .

    The truth is ever closer and they're scared. :)

  • @sausagedogheaven yees and people ignoreing all evidence contrary to their narrow blinder viewpoint that the big bad government is out to get them. They lay back and yell iam avictim as they accept the check from welfare.

  • @CarnivoreEschelon You don't have a coherent viewpoint on 9-11 so you try to label people who consider the evidence and refute it as benefit claimants.

    .

    That says more about you. I hope your mom is proud of you. :)

  • @sausagedogheaven I have a very coherent viewpoint if after recording theses public exchanges and successfully debating the propaganda debating techniques utilized by 911truthers.

  • They are a political movement that utilizes propaganda and self controlled media. Educated self thinkers e know to check your evidence out and not just follow your propaganda claims. This film was made to support Dick Eastmans claim it was an f15 hornet that was flown remotely into the pentagon. It has been proven a hoax.

  • @CarnivoreEschelon Actually, the engineers, pilots and military men who oppose the government are not welfare claimants. They're educated people. Why are criticizing the military, the pilots and the engineers when the government you side with praise the military, pilots and engineers?

    .

    I guess you are just an idiot with an opinion and no useful knowledge to add to this.

  • @sausagedogheaven I do not give credance to psudoscience and creating false evidence.

  • @sausagedogheaven @sausagedogheaven yo haven't made any point the talking heads at any 911truth syndicate have about 15% chance of being qualified inthe level and area of expertise that gives their opinion any weight. Why would any president look at a group that slanders national leaders and uses prpaganda tatics to spread false reality not rooted in physical reality.

  • @CarnivoreEschelon Where did you get that figure? Your ass? Give me the source of your 15% figure?

    .

    Are you a total retard? Look at your words again. You asked, "Why would the president look at a group that slanders national leaders.........blah blah?"

    .

    It's not up to the president you dumb idiot. He's not the courts. He's not the law.

    .

    9-11 Truth Movement is entirely rooted in scientific evidence. The opposition is entirely rooted in branding everyone a terrorist. Bush? haaaaaaaaaa

    .

  • @sausagedogheaven 911 truth movement is not they are disinformationalist and are proven not to be scientific because this vidieo peoves it. Go to orange-papers org and understand why.

  • @sausagedogheaven it is very simple you are a propagandis using Lie By Omission and Half-Truths it is a normal tatic used by 911truthers. When the truth is not as they want it to be.

    Lie With Qualifiers another one of your tatics along with personal attacks that indicates you really are being dishonest.

  • @sausagedogheaven wtc 7 did not have a strange collapse and adding other distractionary bs to it is just disinformation tatics

  • @CarnivoreEschelon Yes it did, if you've seen videos of WTC7 and known controlled demolitions side by side you'll see they are exactly the same.

    Why did the BBC report WTC7's collapse twenty minutes before it came down?

    Why did the whole building collapse looking exactly like a controlled demolition when its fires were almost entirely on one side?

    Why were policemen running away saying it's going to come down? How did they know when the building was clearly still standing?

    Why are you a sheep?

  • @sausagedogheaven Yes and you Haven't talked to NYPD OR NYFD about the fact that they are the ones whom pulled Emergancy Management out of the building after the second plane hit. Your pathatic Disinformation act is transparent most people can filter out 911truther sites and get the facts away from disinformation. You are the one in a paranoid delusion that has no connection to physical truth of an incident. You sit back and make up things. Acting like they are questions.

  • @CarnivoreEschelon Do you know how many NYPD officers and FD officers are speaking out against the bullshit of 9-11? They're taking it through the courts. You're an apologist for the lies of the White House because you are too scared or too stupid to question anything. And where did you learn English? What are you, a retard?

  • @sausagedogheaven Yes and the 911truth movement has yet to win any court cases. Usin unrelated cases brougth by NYPD and NYFD is not helping you prove apoint.

    Fallacy of Presupposition

    Ask for an explanation of something not yet established:

  • @CarnivoreEschelon I wonder why they can't win in the courts? I can't think how the courts could be connected with the government, can you? :)

    .

    Cases brought by the NYPD and NYFD are not unrelated. They are all about 9-11. I trust the men and women first responders before I ever trust Bush and Cheney.

    .

    If you believe B & C and you have no respect for fire personnel and police who were there, then so be it. You don't believe witnesses but you believe a govt. with a track record of lying.

  • @sausagedogheaven the truth is you spread disinformation and I see the tatics used in this feed constantly you have no intrest in the trurh because you create your own.

  • @sausagedogheaven if you can't seperate diffrent vidieo taken from diffrent CCTV units and what they show and how they show it and to top it off you attempt to tell me the eight CCTV vidieos the FBI recived from buisnesses around the pentagon are centered upon pentagon. when they are to provide security for seperate properties. The plane impact was picked up in the background. Flight 77 hit the pentagon and it was a terroist attack. you porovide nothing to prove otherwise.

  • @CarnivoreEschelon Where's the plane? Video of the explosion. Where's the plane? There were over eighty, not eight, videos confiscated by the FBI. Why? . You say there is no plane visible in this video. . Other pro govt. like you say there is a plane visible. . Somebody on your side is lying. :) . You provide no evidence of a plane. . Not one shred of evidence. Those who question are gaining momentum for one simple reason. Govt. explanations and their apologists like you are weak. :)
  • @sausagedogheaven You are the propagandis here There is proff flight 77 hit the pentagon and you just continue to look silly. You are the weak one because you can't do your own research.

  • @CarnivoreEschelon So show us the video of a plane hitting the Pentagon. I've shown you two videos of no plane hitting the Pentagon.

    .

    You can photoshop pictures, talk all day and make claims that are outright lies as have been shown, especially those guys from the newspaper that were blown out of the water for lying.

    .

    Show me video of a plane hitting the Pentagon and I'll have no answer. :)

    .

    After all, the FBI admitted taking 80+ videos from around that area, there must be one with a plane.

  • Comment removed

  • @sausagedogheaven

    you don't want to know any truth that does not fit your interpetation.

    You have to want to know the truth. This is essential. This is the whole ball game. If you don't want to learn the truth, then you probably won't. Love the truth, even if it is sometimes inconvenient or unpleasant. Respect the truth, cherish the truth, seek the truth above all.

  • @sausagedogheaven you have been shown the plane hitting the pentagon and choose to deny it. You must want to know the truth to accept it as it is. This is essential. This is the whole ball game. If you don't want to learn the truth, then you probably won't and you end up a propagandist or a sheeple.

    Love the truth, even if it is sometimes inconvenient or unpleasant. Respect the truth, cherish the truth, seek the truth above all.

  • @CarnivoreEschelon

    I saw something that was definitely not a grilled cheese sandwich. Whether it was a flying Batmobile or Nessie's loogie, we'll never know because the video is shit. Which is what it's supposed to be if all you're trying to capture is images of a person or Sasquatch sneaking in to steal state secrets.

    See I think a plane did hit the Pestagon. It just didn't come in the way they say it did.

    Pilots4911truth check em out.

  • @sausagedogheaven A list of all the videotapes is available, which shows many of these videotapes do not have footage of the Pentagon at all. Instead, many have footage of the WTC, some are security video tapes taken from a Kinko's in Florida, etc. Some that show the Pentagon were taken days after the attacks, and some in the evening of 9/11/2001.

  • @sausagedogheaven Why don't you go to flight77 info 85videos html and get the data and list yourself

  • @sausagedogheaven 911truthers  don't realize, they are indoctrinated into the stupid unbiased, non-demonstrable lie that the government was somehow involved.

  • @sausagedogheaven 911truth cultist  don't realize, they are indoctrinated into the stupid unbiased, non-demonstrable lie that the government was somehow involved.

  • LOL!! ohh women !

  • BWAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA

  • You have to hand it to the Truthy Squad -- they're as persistent as a dog with two dicks.

    However, after eight long years of trying, instead of a smoking gun, all they can come up with is a steaming pile of bullshit.

  • COMPARE 9/11 WITH THIS JET HITTING A CONCRETE WALL AT 500MPH? Where? In your fu**ed mind?

  • Comment removed

  • Another government paid blogger/poster making excuses for cover ups and lack of transparency.

    Maybe he should be talking about the film in the confiscated cameras of the "Dancing Israelis" (which see).

  • That was rude

  • ???

  • you bow leged chicken fucker,fuck off

  • Fucking moron!

  • Even a two years child could tell you that a tower doesn't normally fall through itself only by playing LEGO !

  • Your comments brought a smile to my face. First, to compare a steel tower on fire to a tower of blocks just makes you look like an imbecile. They're not the same thing at all.

    Next, it's obvious that you didn't even look into RKOwens4's videos because he's already disproven EVERY SINGLE THING YOU JUST SAID. You tell ME to provide evidence, but where is yours? You haven't offered any real evidence, only a series of statements with nothing to back them up. Please leave the Internet.

  • You're full of s-h-i--t , moron . I never compared it with a steel tower . And i did viewed that as-s-ho-le's videos . full of c-r-a-p too . just to make you look like a total retar-ded child that you are , look here whatreallyhappened(DOT)com/WRH­ARTICLES/thermite.htm . when you will be an engineer and you will pass the exams i had , then we will talk . till then you are just a load of s-h-i--t--n-i-g--g-er . _I_

  • You moron , you never witnessed a controlled demolition in your life . you are just a fat american fag that likes to think hes smart . get a life you idiot . read a book . go to church and stop wasting other people's lifes .

  • Oh wait, so now I'm a retarded black fat American homosexual child, and you're a structural engineer? You just get more and more fun, don't you? Glad to see you provided some evidence, even if it is a web page that has several gaps in its logic. Too bad RKOwens4 disproved that one too. (watch?v=7YXzjAKJQOg) Do you have a reason for calling his videos "full of c-r-a-p", or are you just angry at how wrong you are?

  • While I've never witnessed a live controlled demolition of any large building, I know about this wonderful thing called Youtube. It lets me watch controlled demolitions whenever I want. I know that might sound crazy, but I'm really not making it up. You should try it some time.

    Seriously though, your consistent and baffling stupidity is the funniest thing I've read since the Darwin Awards. It's like America's Funniest Home Videos, but he just keeps coming back for more.

  • Hey you fag , take a break and fuck off . There is no gap and you know it . If there was any gap , you would have written it here . You wouldn't just send me a video . Btw , you can write your crap here from now on with no worry . I'm not going to wake up every idiot in this world . It's not my job . Screw yourself , i don't care ......

  • I wouldn't be surprised if RKOwens4 IS YOU . Cuz you keep sending it's videos cuz you got no other evidence . So , again , screw yourself cuz i don't care about your faith and your road in your life . When obama will screw your ass you'll remember me .....

  • Every idiot who owns an internet connection can watch youtube , but only a few who REALLY THINK can see the facts . I think you are an american idiot who likes its life and job and he doesn't give a shit on the process of thinking . So , again , the third time , I wash my hands and I tell you : SCREW YOURSELF !

  • And the only idiot here who's stupidity passes the one of a monkey is YOU ! Too bad there is nobody here to say that to you ....oooh , wait , you will make another youtube account and post comments in your favor ! Or maybe you'll give us another shitty RKOwens4 video . Screw both of you , darkness creatures ..... cuz that's what you spread , darkness . I hope a gay guy will SCREW your ass harshly !

  • Wow, just wow. You've once again resorted to solely a personal attack rather than any actual argument.

    Now, about my "gaps in logic" and constant return to RKOwens4. I point to his videos because they explain in a way I simply can't in such a small text box, and when put together form an irrefutable argument against the conspiracy theory. Meanwhile, you've pointed out only one piece of evidence on one topic on one issue. Congratulations! You have just proven yourself an idiot.

  • Now, it's not my job to teach basic science to every idiot in this world, so I'll stop trying. This is rather a good thing as most people, like you, are too stubborn to think and will never accept that their complicated world, where the laws of physics bend to meet their ideas, does not exist.

    Goodbye, annoying German teenager.

  • @Borgilian Lego blocks are diffrent than a tower that is 2000 ft tall and one acre across.

  • You don't have my age and my knowledge in physics and my life experience to tell me that a few cave people blow up those towers ! CUZ THEY COULDN'T ! BECAUSE NORAD IS WATCHING THE AMERICAN SKY EVERY SECOND! WHY NORAD STOPPED ITS ACTIVITY ON THAT DAY !!!!????

    If a plane get's off course , it is shoot down in 10 minutes !!!!

  • 10)Explain to me why there were little dust clouds coming out of the tower 1 second before it collapses ! And tell me why the witnesses heard explosions coming out of the building ! AND TELL ME WHY THE BIG TV CORPORATIONS SAID THE TOWERS FALLED 10 MINUTES BEFORE THEY DID IT !

    11) Tell me why all the videos presented on tv by CNN , fox tv etc were made by PEOPLE WHO WERE EXPERTS IN VIDEO PROCESSING !!!! Tell me !!! And now stop acting like a all-knowing-piece-of-crap !!!!!

  • 6) EXPLAIN to me why there was an incredible heat although there passed 2 weeks since the incident !!!!!

    7) Thermite explosive burns at around 2600 C !!!

    8) Watch some thermite experiments on the internet and compare them with the "MELTING STEEL" falling from the tower while collapsing !!!!

    9) For the towers to fall through themselves it would required all the support columns to melt/destroy in the same time !!! ( SOMETHING PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE !! )

  • 3) Those towers were build to resist such attack ! ( meaning that if this would have happened , only its skeleton would have been up .... something that didn't happened )

    4) It's skeleton was made to resist to fire ! If fire would have ocurred , the skeleton should just warm a bit )

    5) Jet fuel burns at a temperature of 200 C ( the skeleton could had resisted very well to this temperature ! This isn't even the melting point for that metal ! )

  • I would be scared if i would new osama blew those towers . But I am 1000x times much more scared when i know the government did this ! Because they can do this again and again and we won't be able to do anything to stop this ! People like you like to think that what we , the truth seekers say, is a cheap science fiction story . But it isn't ! It's the real world man ! Read some books ! You will see that it's much more simple to control the masses than to control one single human ! WAKE UP !

  • Alright. If you want me to provide evidence here it is:

    RKOwens4

    Watch his videos, then come back and call me a retard. This is not a joke; many people died that day. It is rude and even insulting to suggest what you are suggesting. Interestingly enough, your conspiracy would require upward of 10,000 people to even have a chance of succeeding. You think that's possible? By the way, you don't put spaces before periods, commas, question marks, and exclamation points.

  • Man , that's not evidence because :

    1)If you would know a bit of physics ( and i see neither you or RKOwens4 know anything ) you would saw that the towers fall too fast ! That's physically IMPOSSIBLE , except they had an IMPULSE !!!

    2)Towers that big don't fall like that !! What's the coincidence that 2 towers fall in the same way , without damaging the surround buildings ! ( a tower like that would have falled like a stick )

  • You know , i could write many things that don't fit the subject , like you just did . I can write them very fast and make them glossy , but what's the point in doing that ? I just post straight evidence , but morons like you try to destroy everything that enlightened people are trying to do ! People like you think that this is a joke ! But it isn't a joke ! It's for real man !

  • Wrong video, it looks like.

  • Yet all we're ever shown are 5 frames from a security booth outside the pentagon. WE are never allowed to look at the dozens if not hundreds of other security cameras from the surrounding area which were gathered up within minutes of the pentagon attack.

    Fitzbone you can be sure some of the cameras contained nothing relevant or helpful. But there had to be a handful that had more than 5 frames of nothing which is all we ever saw of the pentagon crash.

  • I always found it odd that some how a large passenger plain crashed into the pentagon yet no civilian took a picture or recorded it. You would think after WTC gets hit everyone would have their cams out the way they did in NYC. There is so much footage in NYC yet nothing with the pentagon. Seems a little odd considering if they had video that would prove it was a plane there would be no reason not to release it.

  • Sun.Sept27 BATTERY PARK NYC

    MARCH FOR ANSWERS 2PM

    BATTERY PARK GROUND ZERO

    CITY HALL- SUPREME COURT.

    BE THERE 4 SUPPORT

  • I think I'll show up and argue.

  • good u might learn something

  • DUMB!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Of course! Jet fuel can't melt steel! Combine that with the VIDEO PROOF here...

    My God! You people were right all along!

  • Dont you know that scientific facts are not debatable, yeah it is kind of like math. For instance you cant argue that 1 + 1 = 2 unless you are ignorant which you apparently are very ignorant and close-minded. But one day someone will stick the truth up your ass and it will be to late for you, and you'll think damn I have been a fucking idiot my whole fucking life!?

  • So if I declare that 1+1=2, then I'm ignorant and closed-minded? To repeat the great Bill Nye:

    Extraordinary claims

    require

    Extraordinary evidence

    Hence, if you were to make an extraordinary claim, (say, that the Moon is made of cheese) you would need to provide extraordinary evidence (spectrometry of lunar surface compared to that of cheese, lunar probe revealing dairy compounds, etc..) that must provide the same result when repeated. (My spectrometry should reveal the same dairy)

  • darkspork , you are another moron along with frasure . check the footage and the evidence . THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF EVIDENCE that this was an inside job ! if you are too retarded or lazy to do that , then STFU ! i don't need you to explain us that 1+1=2 _I_

  • Did you actually READ that post before submitting it? Listen to yourself. If there are "hundreds of evidence," then WHERE IS THIS EVIDENCE? Is any of it scientifically valid, or just hearsay and conjecture?

  • I am not retarded like you to re-read my posts . Did you actually read that post before submitting it ? Listen to yourself . You have just written a non-sense , moron . Again , you should start reading MANY things about WTC before posting here non-sense and trying to look smart , 'cuz you're not . You are just another stupid american learned to believe that you are the best in the world . When you will bring me hard evidence about WTC's structure I will stop commenting here . 'Till then : _I_

  • Furthermore, scientific facts ARE debatable, as are those in mathematics. It was once scientific fact that atoms are the smallest possible particles of matter, but after many experiments like those performed at Fermilab and CERN, dozens of smaller particles have been found. It was no arbitrary guess that found these; it was a series of extraordinary evidence.

    In conclusion, science is debatable as is the fact that 1+1=2. If you have extraordinary proof otherwise, then I'll admit I was wrong.

  • you what's another scientific fact? thermite was NATURALLY PRODUCED in the wtc because of the conditions.

  • frasure , you must be either dumb or retarded to say that THERMITE IS NATURALLY PRODUCED BY THE CONDITIONS ! get a life you scum ! 9/11 was an inside job !

  • LMAO you are fucking moron. I have a degree in Architecture. A86 grade steel like what as in the WTC doesn't have to melt you fuckin moron. It just has to get hot enough to weaken the steel so it collapses. LMAO at you.

  • @sonicfreak12 steel doesnt have to melt to lose its structural strength. duuuuh! aluminothermite is found in railroad ties and steel building structure welds. truthers make me laugh.

  • @sonicfreak12 Too bad you did not add 1 acre of office furnishings to the equation. That is like saying an acetylene torch won't melt steel

  • @sonicfreak12 which is why the WTC didn't melt into a puddle on the ground. Some steel bent, causing the collapse.

    Steel can bend at much lower temps than its melting point.

    think about it.

  • @charlieinspain I hear nano-thermite can bend steel too. Just sayin.

  • @sonicfreak12 Gasoline can melt steel, let alone high octane aviation fuels. I am blacksmith. Google forced air furnaces. Why do you think wharehouse fires leave steel girders bent and lying on the ground. Stop being so fucking retarded and research some common science and metallurgy. Steel can anneal (get soft) in as little as 1400degrees. Common house fires are over 1500degrees! And they have no fuel doused on them!

  • she farted while gasing

  • this has nothing to do with the title and should be deleted for that reason.

  • @pwmarcotte it proves that the citgo CCTV cameras were not focused on the pentagon. Which if you live in the area you would understand that no civilian CCTV security camera is directly focused on the pentagon 24-7 365 days a year as it would be surveillance of a military installation. That would be considered a violation of local, state and federal laws forbidding surveillance of a military or DOD site by a civilian.

  • @CarnivoreEschelon Wow, the incredible bullshit that comes from you is amazing.

    There are two civilian recordings of the explosion at the Pentagon currently on YouTube. A simple search will find them both. They were released by the FBI after they were forced to release them. The FBI confiscated footage of the explosion back in 2001.

    .

    Why were they confiscated? Watch them. An explosion with no plane. :)

    .

    The FBi confiscated over 80 recordings from civilian cameras.

    .

    9-11 = Inside job.

  • @sausagedogheaven propaganda debating techniques you 911truther's use are pathatic. Fact is flight 77 hit the pentagon and no amout revision will change the physical evidence. You can only mislead others so much then overwhelming physical evidence simply superseeds your opinion. Really Judicial watch has them and non are direct views all are off center. You really ar not educated on the laws and your statement makes you look foolish.

  • @sausagedogheaven You are the propagandist here. Neither were focused directly uypon the pentagon or had the focal length lense wise to see the plane let alone the angle. They were not focused on the pentagon.

    If you want to know why the FBI confiscated the eight vidieos each are on judicial watch and the FOI releases state the vidieos that were turned over by the buisnesses to determine flightpath and other pars of physical evidence.

  • @CarnivoreEschelon The bullshit flows from. You're making excuses. The camera could see cars at the same distance but couldn't see a plane.?Yes, ok, in your universe. And before you say the plane was going too fast, a plane on the other side of the Pentagon is shown. But yeah, you now dismiss evidence, just as you accused truthers of dismissing evidence.

    .

    You're saying there's no plane visible. The govt. sheep on YT a say a plane is visible. You contradict your own side. :) You are funny. :)

  • Don't wear a wool sweater while fueling your vehicle.

  • Eso paso por la friccion creo electricidad en su cuerpo al estar tocando tanto su sueter la descarga acciono los gases de la gasolina creando asi el fuego...

  • Uh... how does this compare to 9/11 at all?

    The gasoline caught fire because of static electricity. A small spark between her hand and the metal gas pump was all it took. The exact same thing happens inside of your engine hundreds of times per second to make the car go.

    Perhaps this video is meant to criticize the morons that knock over Jenga blocks with their hands to demonstrate that the WTC should have fallen over?

  • Compare this video to the surveillance videos confiscated then supplied by the govt (after a FOIA lawsuit) around the pentagon.

  • You're right! It all makes perfect sense now! THERE MUST HAVE BEEN EXPLOSIVES IN THE TOWERS!

  • Genius. And yes, there were.

  • IDIOT!!!!

  • static electricity from her sweater.. hasn't anyone figured that out yet?

  • I'm 139476 and can tell you for sure.

    U R IDIOT! u waste time of people.

  • fitzbone, thanks for proving to all youtubers (so far 139,470 of them), that you are an idiot. got anything else to waste our time?

  • the plane hit steel collums and it busted threw that shit how could it even dod that

  • she did exactly everything they tell you not to do when pumping gas.

  • don't worry, it will be the gas stations fault for when she sews for faulty machinery.

  • blow on it

  • YES!!!!! A flamethrower!!!!

    I'm gonna ppick a fight at a gas station XD

  • this has nothig 2 do with 9/11

  • Uh, engine left on anyone?

  • nah just static. she touched it and it lit up.

  • holy shit !!! put it out! run away!

  • it was either the jumper or the interior of the car that was the source of the static charge and then she should keep the damn pump in the innlet!, taking it out will just spread more oil outside the tank and more fire...

  • i HATE static shocks.... HATE EM! i avoided plastic slides in the McDonalds playland before cuz of em.

  • Does anyone know whether there was an explosion after this? The petrol (gas) in the car and the pump was still on fire.

  • see smoking does kill

  • or static :)

  • Yes, she ingited it with static that came off her hand after gently rubbing your jumper as she pulled it down and adjusted it prior to grabing the pump's nozzle. This is why it pays to have a grounding strip attached to the underside rear of your car as it stops these things from ever happening.

  • nah, that was because she got back in her car gaining the static charge and if you notice she didnt touch anything when she got out she didn't discharge the electrons and when she reached for the nosle of the pump, the spark ignited the fumes from the petrol (Gas for you americans) and the last thing she should have done was remove the pump, there could have heen a serious fire....

  • bitch is a cat she def got 9 lives

  • It wasn't static. Go to :53 and see her SMOKING A CIGARETTE. You can't see the cig, but the motions are unmistakable. Bet it was still in her mouth when she returned to the nozzle.

  • duh... even if she was smoking in the car, you can clearly see that she is adjusting her sweater after she steps out of the vehicle. there would be no way you can do that if you're holding a cigarette. this was static electricity. she probably zapped some metal on the pump when she grabbed it, igniting the fumes.

  • 1:05 she tries to blow it out...

  • Instinct demands a woman to blow first, then suck

  • HOLY SHIT LADY U ALMOST BLEW UP

  • verrrrrry lucky. t'was static from the sweater. Thank you science.

  • Statistically speaking, women are at a higher risk of his happening due to the fact that they will most likely re-enter the car, generating static. It is advised that you do not take out the handle should a fire occur. This is because gas in a liquid form does not combust. The vapor does. The best thing to do is to push the emergency shutoff button/valve to stop the flow of gas, or notify the cashier immediately. She was lucky to not have spilled gas all over the ground. . .

  • Also if the flame in the tank fill tube is that small, I'd put the gas cap back on as fast I could. It will starve the fire in the fill tube of oxygen and it will go out. Other wise, if it were to keep burning inside the fill tube, even a small flame like that, could melt a rubber hose that may be part of the fill tube assembly and release a bunch of gas. Now you have a real problem.

  • Better to just not mess with things and let your insurance company handle whatever happens.

    That's what they're there for--and they'd probably prefer to pay for a new car or a new gas pump than lifelong medical care.

  • Todays lesson on why women should never be let out of the house.

  • LMAO.

    true, true.

  • bitches can make a mess in the workforce to,go whine to HR for harassing them,manipulative,gossipy then if they keep themselves in check they can be good workers. Us guys we just screw around and do the work when we have to

  • Nice, note how she doesn't panic, yes it was a static generated fire.

  • Notice she was wearing a sweater. Static electricity caused the fire!.

  • If you have a dryer towel in your pocket you cannot create static electricity.

  • dude you said you would shut the fuck up if CLINTON WASN'T PRESIDENT BY MARCH, SO WHY DO