@888888username i agree with all that. more systems = more complications = more prone to error = more likely that those errors end in catastrophy.
but i was only saying that with a twin, you have more options. Not taking into account pilot ability because before even considering bringing my family in an airplane I want to be proficient. A twin has more options, say at engine failure at 300' after T/O in an urban area. there's a lot of factors. anyway twins are more expensive to operate anyway.
Amazing plane! Not sure who would spend $800,000 on a non pressurized single engine fixed gear not certificated for know icing. But I would fly one on someone else's dime any day.
@Pum0a She was talking about the speed of the prop going through the air. The tips of the propeller can get very close to the speed of sound. It can get very loud and is not good for the prop either.
Does she come with the plane??? I love the new carbon fiber Cessna, but it won't happen in my life any time soon. I just partnered into an old '74 Cessna 206 Nice video though!
Who gives a crap about a chick pilot? Keep it in your pants, you nerdy horn dogs! Wow--a cute female who flies better than you. Hit the books, boys, and concentrate on learning how to fly. JEEEEEEZ!
This chick is off her rocker. The speed of sound at FL 250 at standard temp is 693 mph. This plane doesn't scratch the surface of the sound barrier. People ought to check their facts before spewing off bullshit numbers.
@halojumper70 thinguk56 and karthkkito are right, when the propeller blades break the speed of sound they lose a lot of effectiveness and also create excess noise. To counter this they use scimitar propeller blades, add more blades, or just lower the engine rpm.
P.S. Call me old fashioned, but I like a control yoke more than the side sticks in aircraft.. Just a personal thing.
her name is emily watters (nelson). she was lead salesperson for columbia at the bend airport/factory before the company was sold to cessna. she was the west coast corvalis rep until early 2010 but it's unclear what she's doing now. emily is a CFI with over 2500 hours in various aircraft and is reportedly an expert in garmin and avidyne MFDs.
I do not like to fly above 18000 ft because of the need for the mask. Flew one leg from Bosie to Centenial at 22,000 ft, more exhausting. The only advantage is that if you're flying at 20,000 ft and need to get higher for any reason you have 5,000 additional feet.
@prabhatkaushik , you don't need a pressurized capsule to go that high, only O2. A full O2 bottle(1800 PSI) and mask would be good for long trips at altitude, especially to go around or over storms, or turbulence.
@naperflyer certainly Teledyne Continental wouldn't approve of their engines being run that hard for long cruise periods. I'd also guess your fuel burn would be about 26-28 gph in these conditions.
Now for some real world figures. I would say cruise 220 KTAS @ FL250 @ 20-22gph LOP isn't unreasonable. and ~205 KTAS @ FL250 @ 16gph LOP is realistic as well.
@naperflyer that last figure seems a little far fetched to me as well. Here's the truth about a Corvalis TT's speed. A production CE400 will do between 233-237 KTAS, depending on the plane, configuration, equipment, etc. at its max certified altitude of FL250 and while flogging the crap out of the engine ROP, full throttle, maximum RPM to squeeze every ounce of power available out of it.
Can Someone please post a video and show the plane doing 235kts at 24GPH... or even better, 225kts at 16GPH... They inflat the numbers so high.. There is no way that aircraft will do those speeds.
Hi there... I havent been flying planes for long and as i cannot get a ppl because of my age, I was wondering what it feels like to fly a joystick rather than a traditional yoke???? Thanks, Sammy
Oh yes, Emily knows her stuff. Excellent pilot with a very superb product she's marketing to the public, but come on. . . she wouldn't be nearly as appealing if she were trying to sell a Mooney. . .and that IS the fastest single engine piston around. She doesn't even look like a Mooney person, God bless her. She's a Corvallis person.
smart and good looking blonde...even amar bose, founder of bose corporation would be found of her...man i love the aircraft (looks like cirrus), the pilot and the bose headphones...
@zorfia89 - a CE-172 burns around 9-10 gal per hour in cruise, depending on the model and cruise power settings you select. A CE-400 will burn between 17-24 gal per hour when run 70 deg lean of peak, depending on your cruising altitude as well as your selected range and cruise profiles.
could any1 give me the fuel consumption of cessna skyhawk 172 and the corvallis simple version( non turbo), fule consumption at its cruise speed in 1 hr. ty
It's so cool to see her still out there giving Demos of this great aircraft after seeing her featured in Flight Video Productions video of the Columbia 400 a few years ago. Thanks for posting this.
Check out our newly uploaded video featuring the 2010 Cessna 206 TC (turbo). Great explaination of the G1000 cockpit and autopilot functions. Click on our "video" tab above.
Everytime I fly this plane, I get a kick out of how "jet-like" it is..low interior noise, roomy cabin, easy handling characteristics, avionics suite, etc.
I especially like the "play-back" option for ATC clearances on the radio(s). Eliminates "say again please" 's in high traffic environments.
The air-conditioning is worth the zero's on the price tag!!
You recalled the "Cutlass?" I thought you might have recalled it as the "Gutless" remember!?! :)
These are the old Lancair Certified lines. The used to be called the Columbia Line of aircraft. For the retract, they would have needed to build a certified version of the Lancair IV-P. The 4P was the fasted Lancair ever designed, but it was certified under FAA Rule under the Experimental Category and they never included it in the Columbia line of airframes.
That's the TURBO at 3.44. I love this airplane! I found the airplane very easy to fly (once I found the rudder trim). I was amazed at how quiet and "jet-like" the cabin was. It's a plane you could take a trip with an attorney girlfriend in and she wouldn't be scared....now that's worth the cash!
Those are cute little boobies! would love to watch em jiggle on throttle up..
BPwhistleblower 4 days ago
She IS hot!
donrumsey 3 weeks ago
She is hot, but I would rather have the aircraft--at least it does not talk back, besides that smooth-sounding engine.
AVIATIO 3 weeks ago
The Cessna is more attractive.
lkorn9150 1 month ago
mile high club anyone? BTW whats up with her voice
skipandersen 1 month ago
@888888username i agree with all that. more systems = more complications = more prone to error = more likely that those errors end in catastrophy.
but i was only saying that with a twin, you have more options. Not taking into account pilot ability because before even considering bringing my family in an airplane I want to be proficient. A twin has more options, say at engine failure at 300' after T/O in an urban area. there's a lot of factors. anyway twins are more expensive to operate anyway.
TakingOverCAST 2 months ago
@888888username sorry. did you say a single engine is safer than a twin?
TakingOverCAST 2 months ago
@888888username I couldn't agree more, lot's of tiny minds in this world and YouTube attracts lot's of them...
HeRacesTheSun 3 months ago
@888888username amen, dont set the bar low...aim high.
pliedas 3 months ago
no inglish ja
Eysthin 3 months ago
@888888username
You've had your mother and you've had your sister.
jewtewb 4 months ago
i'll take the demo girl...
novsierra 4 months ago
when she said "twin-turbocharged, dual inter-coolers, 310 hp" I seriously almost lost it. Will you marry me??
tomtom5418 4 months ago
Amazing plane! Not sure who would spend $800,000 on a non pressurized single engine fixed gear not certificated for know icing. But I would fly one on someone else's dime any day.
flyboy7322 4 months ago
This video contains the two most beautiful things in the world.
JCLounon 5 months ago
Admiring both. I think we can do without the lewd comments.
Nonsenseatbay 5 months ago
Pressurized?
TheTopBloke 6 months ago
Is she STUPID? 1:35 "you get pretty close to the speed of sound" - Speed of sound is 1'225km/h ; Cessna 400 has a top speed of 435km/h ??!!!
Pum0a 6 months ago
@Pum0a The prop, not the plane.
TheTopBloke 6 months ago
@Pum0a She was talking about the speed of the prop going through the air. The tips of the propeller can get very close to the speed of sound. It can get very loud and is not good for the prop either.
robertmgreenlee 5 months ago
@Pum0a She's talking about the scimitar shape of the propellers. The prop tips DO get close to the speed of sound.
BenGaut 3 months ago
ew
SCJohnson77 6 months ago
Lancair? wow.. is there much change since it's new name? I bought the RC version of this.. when i twas called a lancair/columbia 400
gewglesux 6 months ago
u ever fly at modesto
jckshtup 7 months ago
Does she come with the plane??? I love the new carbon fiber Cessna, but it won't happen in my life any time soon. I just partnered into an old '74 Cessna 206 Nice video though!
Ted
txnetcop 7 months ago
Who gives a crap about a chick pilot? Keep it in your pants, you nerdy horn dogs! Wow--a cute female who flies better than you. Hit the books, boys, and concentrate on learning how to fly. JEEEEEEZ!
RaptureThis 7 months ago
Very nice plane!! Love the speedbrake and the inspection panels!
tenminutetaxi 7 months ago
Comment removed
JohnReviewer112 7 months ago
She's beautiful...and the plane looks good too. heh
aaokiwan 8 months ago
If you buy the plane for 500K you get a blow job too.
ecktoeman 8 months ago
Stalled 2 times lol
K0nst4nt1n96 9 months ago
is ryan a glider pilot?? He looks like he's putting her into a slip at 8:09 :)
mypspisdead 9 months ago
Wonderful aircraft, I need one of them !
Skayzifly 10 months ago
This chick is off her rocker. The speed of sound at FL 250 at standard temp is 693 mph. This plane doesn't scratch the surface of the sound barrier. People ought to check their facts before spewing off bullshit numbers.
halojumper70 11 months ago
@halojumper70
I think she's referring to prop tip speed......
thinguk56 10 months ago
@halojumper70 The prop is moving very fast and the tip can go supersonic (obviously the plane itself is moving much slower).
karthikkito 10 months ago
@halojumper70 thinguk56 and karthkkito are right, when the propeller blades break the speed of sound they lose a lot of effectiveness and also create excess noise. To counter this they use scimitar propeller blades, add more blades, or just lower the engine rpm.
P.S. Call me old fashioned, but I like a control yoke more than the side sticks in aircraft.. Just a personal thing.
kfordudflight 10 months ago
Did you end up buying the airplane?
dboy4ever 11 months ago
She is gorgeous. Does she really know what she is saying or did she study the academics from cessna?
WHO CARES! RIGHT?
crazyk6 1 year ago
she used to work for columbia as a demo pilot. i have the video of her with a C400 and the G1000 system.
shnewsman 1 year ago
@shnewsman upload;-)
poelaertpieterjan 11 months ago
i don't even know if the company that made the video is still in business...
shnewsman 11 months ago
her name is emily watters (nelson). she was lead salesperson for columbia at the bend airport/factory before the company was sold to cessna. she was the west coast corvalis rep until early 2010 but it's unclear what she's doing now. emily is a CFI with over 2500 hours in various aircraft and is reportedly an expert in garmin and avidyne MFDs.
shnewsman 11 months ago
she is also an ATP and certified in the citation 525. perhaps she went back to flying for a living...
shnewsman 11 months ago
Can someone tell me whats the use of a 25000ft ceiling on the plane without cabin pressurization?
prabhatkaushik 1 year ago
@prabhatkaushik
I do not like to fly above 18000 ft because of the need for the mask. Flew one leg from Bosie to Centenial at 22,000 ft, more exhausting. The only advantage is that if you're flying at 20,000 ft and need to get higher for any reason you have 5,000 additional feet.
columbia400driver 1 year ago
@prabhatkaushik , you don't need a pressurized capsule to go that high, only O2. A full O2 bottle(1800 PSI) and mask would be good for long trips at altitude, especially to go around or over storms, or turbulence.
smimot 11 months ago
@smimot thanks for the info :)
prabhatkaushik 11 months ago
uh oh...mighta landed a little fat there at the end haha...it's all good, you're demoing a cessna 400...that's about as sweet as it gets
manifestgtr 1 year ago
love hearing those turbos spool on takeoff!
nighthawk0077 1 year ago
@naperflyer certainly Teledyne Continental wouldn't approve of their engines being run that hard for long cruise periods. I'd also guess your fuel burn would be about 26-28 gph in these conditions.
Now for some real world figures. I would say cruise 220 KTAS @ FL250 @ 20-22gph LOP isn't unreasonable. and ~205 KTAS @ FL250 @ 16gph LOP is realistic as well.
cff121 1 year ago
@cff121 Nope, 17.9 GPH is the max LOP fuel flow. Depending on equipment, that will give you close to 220. Running 20-22 GPH isn't LOP
parttimeaviator 10 months ago
@naperflyer that last figure seems a little far fetched to me as well. Here's the truth about a Corvalis TT's speed. A production CE400 will do between 233-237 KTAS, depending on the plane, configuration, equipment, etc. at its max certified altitude of FL250 and while flogging the crap out of the engine ROP, full throttle, maximum RPM to squeeze every ounce of power available out of it.
cff121 1 year ago
@cff121 A production 400 won't do those speeds at altitude. More like high 220's if you can run it ROP, and often times you cant.
parttimeaviator 10 months ago
There is some lucky guy somewhere...
justaflyguy11 1 year ago
1:06 Did you say changes angle of incidence? Wow, that is amazing! I thought that is fixed at any given point, but I may be mistaken.
KingOfBanks 1 year ago
I would still rather be in my Piper J3-only problem is its only got an 81" WINGSPAN!
devno9904 1 year ago
Can Someone please post a video and show the plane doing 235kts at 24GPH... or even better, 225kts at 16GPH... They inflat the numbers so high.. There is no way that aircraft will do those speeds.
naperflyer 1 year ago
@naperflyer It will. Just without A/C, prop heat and wing de-ice. Very few of those airplanes out there.
parttimeaviator 10 months ago
Hommina hommina hommina hommina....
Nonsenseatbay 1 year ago
435Km\h Nice;)
jancio2 1 year ago
you can hear the turbo kick in on takeoff haha
ThePiper235 1 year ago
is this Camarillo or Oxnard?
SweatyFunSeeker 1 year ago
@SweatyFunSeeker - Fresno, KFYI
SportsFitNXT 1 year ago
Wow i love this girl!!!
Petejay2 1 year ago
What airport is this?
wyo7011 1 year ago
Hi there... I havent been flying planes for long and as i cannot get a ppl because of my age, I was wondering what it feels like to fly a joystick rather than a traditional yoke???? Thanks, Sammy
MrDjDiversity 1 year ago
You can't beat my 1978 C152 which has a U/S DME, no parking break and worn mixture ratchet.......OK, maybe you can.
Nice 1st landing by the way
8QQHC 1 year ago
Cool, what's her name? ;-)
SwissBadAngel 1 year ago
Oh yes, Emily knows her stuff. Excellent pilot with a very superb product she's marketing to the public, but come on. . . she wouldn't be nearly as appealing if she were trying to sell a Mooney. . .and that IS the fastest single engine piston around. She doesn't even look like a Mooney person, God bless her. She's a Corvallis person.
Spec62 1 year ago
her voice keeps changing
Pilotsofer 1 year ago
nice
danaeromodels1 1 year ago
It definitely didn't look like they cleared the displaced threshold on that final landing haha
houstontexas89 1 year ago
she know her stuff!
formeliandialogue 1 year ago
I love the GPWS and Traffic Proximity call outs!
shanerobertspilot 1 year ago
sounds quiet for a single engine prop plane.
adrianrubi 1 year ago
if I'm flying with her...
the plane better have a good autopilot.
hellview96x 1 year ago
@hellview96x Got to see her and the plane at Reno last year. Christ, she's too much of a distraction lol
mechan9 1 year ago
4:45 what air class are you at?
jusm11 1 year ago
Super sweet ride but please mike the "explainer" - a lot of her comments were impossible to hear, unless she was near your cam and its mike.
I saw the other vid "Cessna 400 290 kts over ground". Mamma mia! I learned to fly in a J-3. This is slightly more advanced.
altooname 1 year ago
sexxy chickka
XX737 1 year ago
just flew this plane handles great and is fun as hell to fly
masterman3178 1 year ago
nice video
cessna1acca 1 year ago
smart and good looking blonde...even amar bose, founder of bose corporation would be found of her...man i love the aircraft (looks like cirrus), the pilot and the bose headphones...
dingoklectos 1 year ago
@zorfia89 - a CE-172 burns around 9-10 gal per hour in cruise, depending on the model and cruise power settings you select. A CE-400 will burn between 17-24 gal per hour when run 70 deg lean of peak, depending on your cruising altitude as well as your selected range and cruise profiles.
cff121 1 year ago
Imagine if that would be a R/C plane!!!
maestrosVIP 1 year ago
could any1 give me the fuel consumption of cessna skyhawk 172 and the corvallis simple version( non turbo), fule consumption at its cruise speed in 1 hr. ty
zorfia89 1 year ago
It's so cool to see her still out there giving Demos of this great aircraft after seeing her featured in Flight Video Productions video of the Columbia 400 a few years ago. Thanks for posting this.
cowkiller04 1 year ago
Yeah 225kts in optimal conditions.
chubsmagoo 1 year ago
Check out our newly uploaded video featuring the 2010 Cessna 206 TC (turbo). Great explaination of the G1000 cockpit and autopilot functions. Click on our "video" tab above.
SportsFitNXT 1 year ago
I´d love to fly the Corvalis. My Cessa 152 is nothing compared to this Plane.
wseucan 1 year ago
Everytime I fly this plane, I get a kick out of how "jet-like" it is..low interior noise, roomy cabin, easy handling characteristics, avionics suite, etc.
I especially like the "play-back" option for ATC clearances on the radio(s). Eliminates "say again please" 's in high traffic environments.
The air-conditioning is worth the zero's on the price tag!!
SportsFitNXT 1 year ago
Sorry for all the typos, Mike. I am very tired today.
757LeftSeat 1 year ago
Mike,
You recalled the "Cutlass?" I thought you might have recalled it as the "Gutless" remember!?! :)
These are the old Lancair Certified lines. The used to be called the Columbia Line of aircraft. For the retract, they would have needed to build a certified version of the Lancair IV-P. The 4P was the fasted Lancair ever designed, but it was certified under FAA Rule under the Experimental Category and they never included it in the Columbia line of airframes.
I think they should have.
757LeftSeat 1 year ago
What's next for this line? Retracts? (recalling the Cutlass from the Slowhawk...).
What's with the auto traffic alert system - standard? (and wouldn't it drive you nuts with a lot in the pattern?)
Mikeishere1st 2 years ago
omg 235knts in 23-24 gallons
strangerx1 2 years ago
what do you gotta do for a demo flight, does it cost anything and can you do them at any cessna dealer
sk8rguy178 2 years ago
To arrange a demo, contact Sarah at Channel Islands Aviation - (805) 987-1301 x 126
SportsFitNXT 2 years ago
@sk8rguy178 You probably have to be wearing very expensive sunglasses, polo shirt and smell terrific.
OI8APC2 1 year ago
female pilots are hot
sk8rguy178 2 years ago 35
Great video, appreciate the inteview with good questions. That is " the plane " to fly on fix gear SEL. Thanks for sharing!
alduncine 2 years ago
That's the TURBO at 3.44. I love this airplane! I found the airplane very easy to fly (once I found the rudder trim). I was amazed at how quiet and "jet-like" the cabin was. It's a plane you could take a trip with an attorney girlfriend in and she wouldn't be scared....now that's worth the cash!
SportsFitNXT 2 years ago
@SportsFitNXT a Cessna with a low wing design =X thats new haha this plane is a beauty thank for posting
THExGOODxLIFE307 2 years ago
women who fly are hot!
and so is the plane ... the perfect package hehe
pimpmytafel 2 years ago 21
@pimpmytafel true, but time wasted by her flying is time she could be using to make me a sandwich
ILOVETIKKAMASALA 9 months ago
@ILOVETIKKAMASALA very good point
louistheonion23 8 months ago
I believe you can hear the turbo spool at 3:44
SubiesAreForMe 2 years ago 4
jaja i know i heard it too! jaja
simfgta 2 years ago
Sweet! Can't wait to get mine!
ljackso 2 years ago
forget the plane..i want HER!!
tabu99 2 years ago 5
As long as we're all daydreaming, ask for both!
hewcharles 2 years ago
I want one too, but too bad it's not retractable. respectable airspeeds at high altitudes though.
eceflyboy 2 years ago
Me want one too
sgtdavids 2 years ago
(sigh) Me want one.
kelerite 2 years ago