Added: 5 years ago
From: seandulac
Views: 11,699
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (54)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it,s funny how the main stream media can give so much time to pieces concerning bullshit politicians and their affairs and so-called celebrities and their nervous breakdowns but they cannot give adequate time to an event that has changed the face of politics and foreign affairs and not to mention the amount of lives that were lost on that day and after. They give just enough time to make someone like prof. Jones look like they can't make a valid point. At least let them answer the question.

    '

  • Steven Jones isnt much of an interviewee

    He doesnt get to the point very well lol

  • Tucker: do you have any evidence of these claims?

    Jones: well there's the video clip I sent you.

    Tucker: we don't have time for that, instead I'm going to ask you the same questions over and over again.

  • Of course people like Tucker are freaking Idiot talking head spin doctors, but man oh man why can't these 9/11 truth folks be a freaking little more persuasive....they simple sit there politily taking bull from the Idiot hosts!!! My God speak up and be forceful or you will never get anywhere on these shows! It take some challenges to get these hosts in a tight spot, use them!

    Fight FIRE with FIRE....No wonder the word isn't getting anywhere. DON'T LET THEM WALK ALL OVER YOU!

  • Because, the moment they do that, they give the debunkers the excuse they deperately need to accuse the theorist of being crazy, irrational, or unreasonable, and thereby unqualified to hypothisize or even be taken seriously. This man is smart enough to know this, and maintains his level-headedness. His calm disposition has a strong affect on the open ear, when contrasted against this host's attempt to scramble and distort his material. It's clear it is the reporter who is skirming here.

  • Ya know what's fucked up. Even if the steel melted and made that top part of the Tower fall in, there's no way in hell it would've made the other 96 "undamaged" floors collapse at free-fall speed. What's that a collapse speed of about 0.001 of a second a floor? It's impossible. That's right up there with vanishing in to thin air. I can't believe these fuckers are going to get away with this shit.. All those people...man. I hope this is kept alive until someone pays.

  • Dr. Steven Jones!

    ROFL!

    When is this guy going to ever give up!

    By the way, the buildings NEVER collapsed at freefall speed.

    Freefall speed is just another twoofer lie.

    Even you twoofer messiah Dr. Steven Jones admitted it didn't fall at freefall speed.

  • Do you really think it matters if they fell 3 or 4 seconds faster than free-fall speed? If that tower took 20 seconds to fall that would add up to 0,002 of a second per floor. Do you know how fast that is? The only way to move a floor of steel and concrete that fast is with help. Just ask any demolition company (except for control) and they'll tell ya the same thing. By the way, let me know when they fork up all that confiscated video from the Pentagon, hotel & gas station.

  • I met Steven Jones when he came to Boston, he is a very nice, very honest man.

    His science has not been adequately debunked by any means! It was only after reviewing all of the Debunking Arguments made against Dr. Steven Jones and his work that I became 100% absolutely CONVINCED that this was an Inside Job.

    There is just absolutely no way that NIST's theory could be true! Not 3 times in one day! It's antiscientific!

  • Occam's Razor. :)

  • Prof. Jones wrote a paper

    "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" when questioned by the

    engineering dept at BYU about his paper not being accurate and not being peer

    reviewed he submitted it to scholars for 9/11 truth and peer reviewed it

    himself seeing as he is a co-founder scholars for 9/11 truth and is one of the

    reviewers he essentially validated his own work.

  • False! 'marksman500' you are wrong. AJ has submitted papers to legitimate peer reviewed journals and his work has withstood the scientific review. He failed the political review/attacks, which is no surprise.

  • ..."his work has withstood the scientific review."...

    ----

    I wil stand corrected, if you can provide more detail on who these creditable peers are.

    I couldnt find anything..thx

  • stand up! 'Environmental anomalies at the WTC: evidence for energetic materials.'

    - published in Springer journal The Environmentalist

    'Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction'

    - Published in The Open Civil Engineering Journal

  • What an asshole Tucker Carlson is!!! Total asshole!

  • 4:00 NO! people dont think that, at least i dont because it violates fundamental laws of physics you fucking moron. I tell you, this cock sucker interviewer is suspect. 5:28 Offensive?!! whats more offensive than the scam being played?!

  • This interviewer is suspect. Media Scum.

    OUT OF TIME?!!

    SHOULD WE GIVE THIS ISSUE ALL THE TIME IT DESERVE?

  • There is no theory. This guy should be taken as fact. Of course there were bombs. The firemen confirm it.

  • neo conservitive channels on this site also never allow feed back, i guess because they are right all the time just like fox news is, damn know it all...lol

  • Coup d' etat, anyone? American Imperial Fascism in-the-making...

    Support Ron Paul '08

    Restore our Constitutional Republic!

  • Word.

  • look...sorry...anyone saying the towers fell contraditcing the laws of physics following the path of maximum resistance in a neat pile...well...sorry to say my friends...but you are the real non scientific conspiracy theorists...

  • Indeed, the official conspiracy theories are utter bullshit. Fire had never before collapsed any building; kerosene has never and never will melt steel to the point of collapse. The 'official conspiracy theories' actually raise more problems than they explain, the mark of a BAD theory.

  • This is total bullshit. The building shown from Norway collapses from the FIRST FLOOR. WTC 1 and 2 collapsed from the impact floor. So much for your insane liberal conspiricy theories. "Liberalism is a mental disorder".-MSavage

  • Wow you're totally brainwashed by the right left hegelian dialect.

    What is it now. All conservatives believe every official spewed out by the mainstream media while liberals are wild anarchists?!

    WTF You're crazy.

  • If you wanted it to look like you can blame it on the planes then thats how you would do it. But only scientifcally uneducated people would ever fall for that official explanation. Thats why they put out the myth in the media that the towers were hollow tubes, and then tried to make us forget WTC7 ever existed. Thats why 9/11 Commission also claimed towers were hollow tubes.

  • That was WTC7 that was shown and it collapses from the ground level. Here we see the level of analysis given to the 'it just fell down' hypothesis. This guy doesn't even know which building were looking at.

  • Why was there such a big difference between the WTC 1 and 2 destruction and the pentagon crash? What happened to the jet fuel that dropped two towers but failed to burn books and break windows at the pentagon. Not to mention leave no skid marks.

  • Fucking Murdoch... Watch it ladies and gents, the FTC is about to make it easier for people like him to gobble up all of your LOCAL news outlets too!

    So much for "fair and balanced", eh?

  • Which true reason is that? The official one that for some reason they envy our 'freedom and democracy' or the objective one that the West has controlled their lands for centuries either directly as imperial vassals or by installing corrupt and tyrannical dictatorships.

  • your second objective my friend.

  • lol you know I saw the pictures of the south face, and yes it was slightly damamged but not realy enough to make it fall at free fall speed. and the picture from NIST was modified as we can see from an other picture that was taken of the south face with the peice that was said to be missing from the peices that hit it... interesting. but if it was the hold on the south side... then it would have fell that direction... remove a leg from a chair, and tell me which direction does it fall?

  • i am not a muslim but I hate this unequal ass country of leaders.

  • My job in US Air Force was sabotaging US military bases using explosive controlled demolitions. This is a common job for 1,000s of US soldiers every day. We took C4 shape charges and det cord, attached them to US military aircraft and US nuke bombs, then planned wargomes for blowing them up, all under NATO command and control. PirateNews. org / Pentagon_Whistleblower. html

  • dumb, dumb american. when are you going to wake up? let me know.

  • you havent the slightest inkling of how the world works, and who owns you and your thoughts. here's a clue for you. research what the media moguls have in common. apparently you're trying to figure it out, but you're on the wrong path. think a little more critically, not whatever you think is black and white.

  • whats the deal with Tucker Carlson's tie? jeez that's where americans get their news from? wow

  • Hey non-believers.. did you know that the world is FLAT!!!....uh... oh. they proved that's not true. Sorry. Don't argue with denial. People's ego blind them of the truth. lol

  • building 7 wasnt hit by an airplane, no. but buildings one and two fell into the base of building 7. a damaged and weakened building 7 caught fire, did not melt the steel skeleton, but softened the structure. now with all of the weight the building above, the building eventually gave way after burning for several hours. stop the moronic conspiracy theory on this already.

  • how do u know

  • most people see the norther side of wtc 7 and it doesnt really look so bad. but no one could see the damage made to the south side of the building. most idiots will think the building was in great shape because of this. but type in popular mechanics article debunking wtc 7 myths. it was just as i thought.

  • If the building fell due to the section of the south face that was missing, it would have toppled onto its south face.

  • did you watch teh debate with pm and loose change, and did you see how pm tottaly ignored points made by loose change? lol and the multed steel... pm didn't debunk anything but make up a bunch of lies that look reasonable, and then mix emotion into their debates to make peoples feels go to their side.

  • That MSNBC clip was outrageos. They cut him of before he can explain anything, saying "we don't have alot of time". What?! the guy is blowing 9/11 wide open, and tucker carlson says "we don't have alot of time", yet Anna Nicole gets months of coverage.

  • not fox,fox is a large company,some of the high ranking members and its owners do know but they will not tell you because if they did they will lose the support from american citizens and their interprise will be done gone for ever.

    thats why 911 is important,because its the prove to get all the criminals once and for all.

    wellcome to the twighlight zone

    peace

  • How little do you have to know about physics, metallurgy, and impact dynamics to comment on this piece? The structure of all three towers lent itself to collapse...given the right conditions. The taller towers were built to withstand high wind, not fully-fueled jet aircraft crashing into them. Go down to your local Kmart and buy a clue.

  • Are you kidding? They are telling you that FIRE caused that nearly 50 story sky scraper, WTC7, to disintegrate into dust and steel fragments in under 7 seconds. You don't need a lot of formal training to know that is BS.

  • Why are there references to Fox News when the broadcast excerpts are from MSNBC? Confusion, assumption, or ignorance?

  • Fox News is like Kleenex for idiot box 'News'. Or tabloid news if you like. It is a derogatory term used to describe the fiction entertainment broadcast people delude themselves into thinking is news. I could just have called it Homer News.

  • Ahhh...spoken (written) like a true non-watcher of said channel. At least Fox acknowleges the existance of more than one side to a story. It reminds me of the music director in 'Amedeus' who said of Italian as the proper language for opera, "All educated people agree on that". To which a collegue responded, "Do they?", with a note of whimsical disbelief. There is more than meets the eye...or the brain. So forgive me for not 'falling' for the conspiracy theories.

  • MSSRUS,

    You can fall for what ever you want. You want to believe in public myths to make yourself feel better you go right ahead.

  • Wow, you don't think for yourself, huh...that sucks for you. WAKE UP!!!

  • its not about "thinking" it.u can tell by the way the act.

    did u do it? NO i didnt stole 13 dollars with 22 cents at 2:34 pm in haliburton street wearing a blue shirt!!!

    esnir sounds jewish,they think as long as its good for the Godly race they can kill anyone,thats why i ask u.u can never be in favor of 911,thats sick.

    peace

  • are you serious? this prick has been Told something like, don't let him go too far, for example cut in if he brings up an issue that has been pre assessed, as "avoid this, because we can't explain it and he can"

    this is standard procedure, use some fuckin foresight.

  • Esnir you mean, that you are aware of, but what does that matter, go back into your hole...

    This guy interviewing Steven is a prick, Steven is careful not to say anything that goes too far too soon, before he's had a chance to explain anything,

    then he gives a quote, trying to get the audience against him.

    Your world is scripted, you're in lala land

  • u have to be 0% blind!

    check the facts please,theres no time to debate,im not selling any products,its the truth.

    peace

  • how blind do u have to be to not see its a damn inside job!?!

    everyone keep the good fight going on!!!!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more