Both of those are wack!!! Disposable cameras are the way to go. They fit in the pocket. No one has to worry about noise, and they don't put a dent in the bank account.
yeah.... good thing this shows absolutely nothing about either camera. It also doesn't take into account what settings each camera was being shot at and the fact that the D3 has a faster frame-rate so of course will probably fill the buffer faster.
The nikon d3s has 1 to see 2 photos less per second than the standard(cannon) mark 4, but the nikon gére much better the iso than the standard(cannon)
can't really tell which one chokes first but this was a damn good review. you should know why nikon choked first bcuz nikon incorporates 1 imaging processor (aka single expeed) while the canon uses dual processor (aka dual digic 3) therefore, the canon could processes faster and more images than the nikon could do. so, if its clearly said that canon are better than the nikon.
isn't the 1d mk3 a crop sensor at 10mp, compared to 12mp full frame on the d3? the d3 has a bit more processing to do, so i assume it would choke first.
@geebz86 no. not really... but if you are comparing the current eos lineup, the 1dmk4, its got more MP and higher shutter speed, comparing to the nikon d3s, its still stuck at 12MP. and the nikon still lost out in continuous shooting
@Xyb3rTeCh yeah, the tired conversation of course is that 12 mp is already way more than most people will ever need--even for making large prints. The fact that it has ridiculously amazing iso to boot makes the comparison quite a different story.
Did you use the same CF card speeds for both cams? I have a 1D3, and haven't fully used the buffer until it starts to choke. I hear if you use the new Extreme IV cards it won't choke even if you use raw.
I forgot about my comment.Thank you, now it makes me laugh too. /:-[]
I tell you qrgfey...these are the same kind of people who buy an Hasselblad Fisheye just to say they got one and then keep it locked in a safe...(and use it once a year to portrait the tip of their dick...(figure that?) IT LOOKS SO BIG
Or, moving into sport cars...those idiots who load clips of their Ferrari revving like hell...handbrake on!
What a bullshit comparison... That's like saying a shotgun is more accurate if fired 500 times at a target from far away than a .50 caliber sniper shot once because the shotgun will eventually hit.
They both are great cameras and if you are actually shooting all the time like that anyway you probably aren't really composing your shots and are just piling up thousands of shots to go through. Hope you're shooting in jpg lol
If you shoot professional sports like football or basketball, you're shooting well over 900 shots anyway. Composition is important, but the kinds of photography that require high FPS aren't the ones where you spend 30 seconds to a minute composing shots.
Its my job too, and I have shot 10 fps infact we hooked up 3 cameras for 30fps film camera's didn't give us the coverage we needed. why? because people paid us alot of money to do it, if Iwas called an amateur I could use the money to wipe my tears ;)
Yeah! (but Nikon's SO rule, with the d3's high iso performance you could probably use the detailed pics of the inside of the lenscap as product shots ;P)
Your a gear head not a photographer but if you do want to be a gear head a d300 blows away a 50d okay, and the nikon d3 is a lot more high tech then the canon m3 , nikon d3 has 2 card slots, fx and dx and so so, i like how you say canon is better but yet you have a point and shoot you are terrible.
Hi there, can you re-do this test leveling the variables please?
Set the Nikon to the same speed as the 1Ds dissapointing maximum 5fps and make sure both cameras are running the same image size making it a fair test. Running the Canon at 5fps and jpeg is not fair compaired to running the nikon at 11fps and RAW. I'm not saying thats what you did but the Nikon is deffinately shooting a lot faster shutter speed than the canon. I'm assumeing thats the D3 and canon 1d Mk III isn't it?
and actually, shumeshi makes a very good point. just calm down a little, eh? i mean, do you ever expect to win an argument by telling someone to suck something? you are just another one of the people who make youtube a less enjoyable experience. for once, i want to find a video without a ridiculous argument in the comments below. Let's just say this.... Canon and Nikon are the top camera manufacturers.
but when it comes to canon i cant!! just let go...
especially when people dont even know the facts and dont bother to do their research.............nikon is a good camera.....but when "nikon users" bad mouth canon i have no choice but to stick up for my brand choice camera........i happen to love national geographic and some guy is like no they use nikon..i know someone who works for national geographic!!!!!!
Nikon does not suck, so what if it chokes on shooting fast? it still has great color imaging than canon, and more accurate than canon, because it has more focus points. i like canon, and i like nikon. be nice.
Agreed. Although I like both and have used both, all *my* gear is Canon. Nat geo uses Canon because of the lenses...which are the main reason I have stuck with Canon and WILL stick with Canon.
I don't know what you mean by National Geographic is using Canon, go to their website, see their photographers, they use both Canon and Nikon. In fact it's not even written anywhere, just sometimes they have their cameras with them in the picture. That just means only suckers like yourself need to worry about the brand. If you can't get a good photo with Nikon you can bet you ass you won't get it with Canon either.
coolchef1337: i wasnt replying at your comment.. i was replying at other comment. i didnt even read your comment... some how my comment end up at the latest post.. i dont know why.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
YOU FORGOT TO TAKE OFF THE LENS COVER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! eaeuiheuaheuaehauehauehauehauehaeuhaeuheuhaeuhaeuaheuaheuaheuehauehauehaeuaheuheauheauehaueheuhaeuheuaehueuheuaheauehauehaeuheauheauehauehaueheuaheuaehueh .... sorry ... i couldn't avoid ...... and ... still a dumb test .... ;) !!!
no shit, but u can select between the fx ful frame or to the dx cropped so u can still use ur existing dx lenses, with the dx option selected the d3 can actually shoot at 11 fps
Oh, sorry... i don't care about DX crop... if it's FX, keep it FX.. only fags are buying cheap DX's and, by the way, discount lenses (Sigma, Tamron) to this awesome camera...
I mean only fags are buying DX lenses to FX body. This is really dumb, even if you can get everywhere some cheap, but still not so expensive Nikkors... like the manual focus 20/3.5 UD, 50/1.2, 85/1.4, 180/2.8...
oh yeah, I totally agree with you. I mean, if you have $3000 to spend on the d700 body spring for something like the 24-70 f/2.8 why don't you?! or even get a cheaper non AF-S lens, but not a DX lens...what a waste of the full frame sensor that would be.
globetrackers: Really? Show me some photos from D3 with DX lens on FX mode... and think, who is stupid... actually the 35/1.8 DX only is usable, but so-so usable, it vignettes so hard...
Did you read the comment you left ? "Nikon D3 is faster than Canon 1Ds Mark III because it's has less megapixels but 1D Mark III is still faster than D3"
canon have a 21.1mp FF 1Ds MKIII and the 10.1mp 1.3x 1D MkIII since the file for the 1Ds is twice the size of the D3 it take longer to buffer. If Canon wanted the 1Ds MKIII to shoot 9fps they would have done that but whats the point the D3 has 12.1 mp so does the origional 5D and thats been out for near 5 years now. nikon needs to step it up.
haha. so blunt. Sorry to disagree, but Canon does not suck. I love my Nikon and I will stick with my Nikon, but, Canon is just as good. If either one were worse than the other, the worse one would not be around.
That just isn't true. If it was true, I'm sure Nikon would be the best selling DSLR manufacturer, as opposed to Canon, no? Most pro's use Canon, so I don't see how you can argue Nikon are superior. They are neck and neck. PS I myself shoot Nikon.
i agree, personally i prefere canon glass and canon IQ but i know that i would miss some important shots purely due to the fact that canons ergonomics disagree with me. I shoot a d300 and couldnt be happier (unless somone handed me a d700) about popularity, lets put it into perspective. i was recently at glasto festival and i cannot recolect seeing one d3 i saw literally hundreds of 1ds mk3s. alas only my friend and i sported liecas that weekend
While Canon has the highest sales, Nikon is close behind in second, far behind in third is either sony olympus pentax or fuji. Canon and Nikon are close, though Canon is pulling ahead.
are you not the man? you shoot with Nikon so you must be the man. kidding - nah but i prefer Nikon, but i would not mind having one of those damn Canons!!!
Canon canon canon canon... Ok, the only flaw is the FPS... 5FPS is more than enough considering the image quality that Canon delivers that, with out a doubt, beats Nikon a100 times
$4K for the canon verses $4.5K for the nikon? Its cool that you want to bag on this because youre a techie dork but atleast get your facts straight nuggggaaaaaa
The MKIII stomps the D3 here, and in most areas (including AF performance, color accuracy, etc).
Also, the buffer on the D3 is insufficent for RAW shooting, which most pros will be using. It also apparently has a hard time hitting even 9FPS.
When it comes to high ISO performance, the D3 finally catches up to what Canonites have been used to for half a decade. The difference in noise between these two cameras is VERY small.
Canon still provides the world's best pro sports camera.
Casio has a digital camera which can do 60fps.. my point here is 'fps' doesn't tell the whole story. It's good to had HIGH fps, but you have to compare them apple to apple... D3 & 1DMK3, both have diff MegPixel.. if you read the spec, you will know who the KING in fps comparsion.
Yeah, but also it is important to take into consideration more than megapixels. It's important to consider the density of pixels on a sensor as to its ISO performance. The D3 destroys just about everything in ISO performance. And FPS. Maybe not mega-pixels, okay, definitely not megapixels, but speed-wise the D3 is king. It really depends on each photographer's needs as to which camera is best. There is no ultimate best dSLR.
Guys, you don't need 100 jpegs, you might not even need 64 jpegs..
The difference between 9 and 10 and 11 fps is totally irrelevant, what is the real competition between these 2 is low noise and very fine grain + intelligent sensor engineering....
My point is that with UDMA cards the D3 will be able to take more photos in the end. The buffer size becomes irrelevant when using the right card. Ultimately a pro photographer needs to shoot a lot more than what the buffer can hold and this is when the D3 has an advantage.
Your test is deliberately set up to make one camera look better when in a real situation it is quite the opposite.
Specs say different. 64 JPGs (21NEF) Vs 110 JPGs (30 CR2). So if i want a fast burst at a wedding of the bouquet toss then the Canon would seem the better choice as it supports 3 seconds of shooting Vs the 2 of the Nikon.
You're saying that *if* I have a UDMA card in the D3 *and* *if* I shoot in a special way i can get more pictures.
With the settings I had on both camera's it made no difference that the D3 hit it's buffer first.
I shoot how I shoot, and that's what happens when I setup.
It is kind of pointless to slow the Nikon D3 down if you are not using CF cards that support UDMA. With a UDMA card the D3 can shoot write to the card about three times faster effectively extending the total amount of frames that it can store at full speed before the buffer fills.
And just how many people, how many times are going to need to take 50 photos + in the space of 5 seconds? I certainly wouldn't want to be the one editing the photos of someone who uses a camera like a machine gun!
the camera is just a tool behind the camera is a great minded person a stupid idiot just pressing the shutter
brodrick808 2 months ago
Both of those are wack!!! Disposable cameras are the way to go. They fit in the pocket. No one has to worry about noise, and they don't put a dent in the bank account.
davidg1024 4 months ago
Both Canon and Nikon have their own respective Pros and Cons. Its up to you which fits your need best! Stop being immature.
totchikits 5 months ago
Hey dumbass, D3 shoots 11fps and has a 12mp full frame sensor, 1D Mk 3 shoots 10fps and has a 10mp APS-H sensor, who wins now, canon? I think not.
XwaD666 6 months ago
camera porn :) dnt compare cameras on shutter. focus more in the quality and noise reduction
wrobe00011 8 months ago
@wrobe00011, Haha, Nikon wins then.
175myles 7 months ago
@175myles YES!!!! :) agree!!
wrobe00011 6 months ago
canon stops at some fps thats shit thats wy nikon rules, or maybe que is shooting on RAW thats wy its stops
pablowito 9 months ago
the cards could be different
ashtonwentworth1 1 year ago
The 1Ds Mark III wasn't made for Sports Photographers, The 1D Mark III and 1D Mark IV are meant for sports photographers.
cubeproduktion 1 year ago
is beautiful sound :)
nikonaazz 1 year ago
who gives a fuck? this idiotic video proves absolutely nothing at all
CEEPMDEE 1 year ago 2
Who cares about the buffer
ajlepisto 1 year ago
yeah.... good thing this shows absolutely nothing about either camera. It also doesn't take into account what settings each camera was being shot at and the fact that the D3 has a faster frame-rate so of course will probably fill the buffer faster.
martinaee 1 year ago
@martinaee D3 has a 9 FPS and the 1Dmk3 has 10 FPS you got your information wrong.
Xyb3rTeCh 1 year ago
How often do you shoot a burst that long?
I'm a sports shooter and I've never shot bursts that long!
paintbasstard 1 year ago
This is a stupid demonstration,one at a time dummy.
katource1 1 year ago
oh my.. i would save those shutter counts =D
meldrian 1 year ago
i say .. wrong setup on the d3
spasovski1984 1 year ago
The nikon d3s has 1 to see 2 photos less per second than the standard(cannon) mark 4, but the nikon gére much better the iso than the standard(cannon)
TheLoool13 1 year ago
why is this necessary?????
SuperSnowybear 1 year ago
in terms of build, iq , focus and iso performance the nikons beat anything from canon! end of :))
quickshooter100 1 year ago
Pointing out simply canon 1D 3 is a pro camera. Why would you not shoot at 10 FPS If you can. I use the cameras strengths to enhance my shots
FuryPhotos 1 year ago
can't really tell which one chokes first but this was a damn good review. you should know why nikon choked first bcuz nikon incorporates 1 imaging processor (aka single expeed) while the canon uses dual processor (aka dual digic 3) therefore, the canon could processes faster and more images than the nikon could do. so, if its clearly said that canon are better than the nikon.
Xyb3rTeCh 1 year ago
WOW! that was pretty close - I think Canon reach the finish line first. Canon wins!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
kenfrancis74 1 year ago
that compares nothing... do one and then the other
vinh291 1 year ago
isn't the 1d mk3 a crop sensor at 10mp, compared to 12mp full frame on the d3? the d3 has a bit more processing to do, so i assume it would choke first.
geebz86 2 years ago
@geebz86 no. not really... but if you are comparing the current eos lineup, the 1dmk4, its got more MP and higher shutter speed, comparing to the nikon d3s, its still stuck at 12MP. and the nikon still lost out in continuous shooting
Xyb3rTeCh 1 year ago
@Xyb3rTeCh yeah, the tired conversation of course is that 12 mp is already way more than most people will ever need--even for making large prints. The fact that it has ridiculously amazing iso to boot makes the comparison quite a different story.
martinaee 1 year ago
And not a decent shot between them:)
anubis33 2 years ago
OH! Those poor fucking shutters!
nintendodude01 2 years ago 25
Did you use the same CF card speeds for both cams? I have a 1D3, and haven't fully used the buffer until it starts to choke. I hear if you use the new Extreme IV cards it won't choke even if you use raw.
Did you shoot raw in this demo for both?
nataatma 2 years ago
Testing your testicles..
One, two..check..check
boitapower 2 years ago
@boitapower , ahahaha ahaha yo make me laugh hard....ahaahahahah..
qrgfey 2 years ago
I forgot about my comment.Thank you, now it makes me laugh too. /:-[]
I tell you qrgfey...these are the same kind of people who buy an Hasselblad Fisheye just to say they got one and then keep it locked in a safe...(and use it once a year to portrait the tip of their dick...(figure that?) IT LOOKS SO BIG
Or, moving into sport cars...those idiots who load clips of their Ferrari revving like hell...handbrake on!
Wroooommmmm
Wrooooommmmm
in Italy we say: MA VAFFANCULO
go and get a job
boitapower 2 years ago
and???
2515522 2 years ago 2
what you care most for a camre frame or pixels?
This video is just sound.
DjAligator14 2 years ago
YOUR KIDS>>>>>
A1StudioPhotography 2 years ago
two words, mon-tage.
genericBauer 2 years ago
muito louco
desconectadoestou 2 years ago
What a bullshit comparison... That's like saying a shotgun is more accurate if fired 500 times at a target from far away than a .50 caliber sniper shot once because the shotgun will eventually hit.
They both are great cameras and if you are actually shooting all the time like that anyway you probably aren't really composing your shots and are just piling up thousands of shots to go through. Hope you're shooting in jpg lol
martinaee 2 years ago 3
If you shoot professional sports like football or basketball, you're shooting well over 900 shots anyway. Composition is important, but the kinds of photography that require high FPS aren't the ones where you spend 30 seconds to a minute composing shots.
aisleseven 2 years ago 2
stupid vid.
DemonicGenocide 2 years ago 3
if someone thinks that when you work with a camera it's necessary to shoot as long as this video... he is obviously not a photographer.
v3rtic4L5miL3 2 years ago 2
haha exactly!!!
DemonicGenocide 2 years ago
proud to be one of them :)))))))
v3rtic4L5miL3 2 years ago
You've clearly never shot sports before.
aisleseven 2 years ago
before what???
I'll explain only one thing Mr ailseven...
That's my fucking job!
I'm a press photographer, if you don't believe me, i'll send you in PM my name for google it...
Therefore every weekend, I take pictures of Basket ball, Rubgy, Football, etc etc.
A professional photographer never shoot 10 pics in a row...N-E-V-E-R
Nonetheless if someone do that beside his fellow-workers on the edge of a stadium, he 'll make fun of him in less than one minute....
like the amateur he is.
v3rtic4L5miL3 2 years ago
Its my job too, and I have shot 10 fps infact we hooked up 3 cameras for 30fps film camera's didn't give us the coverage we needed. why? because people paid us alot of money to do it, if Iwas called an amateur I could use the money to wipe my tears ;)
dreamlite 2 years ago
5 or 6 shots on the trot is the maximum.. You have to anticipate what's going on & shooting 5 or 6 pictures in a Half/second...
After this decisive instant it's too late & your pics are good to throw away.
In the facts, when you work beside other Pros, almost Everybody shots at the same time...
Really nice soundscape
v3rtic4L5miL3 2 years ago
Well sir, I stand corrected. My apologies to you :)
aisleseven 2 years ago
Ok no worries ! :)
v3rtic4L5miL3 2 years ago
xx fps. And?
VIZIRUL 2 years ago
Comment removed
MungozZz 2 years ago
both are one of the world's top leading DSLRs and obviously cannot be compared through such ways.
adrianproduction 2 years ago 4
you all are dumbasses
arguing over which camera is better, because of the frame rate, listen to yourselves
use the cameras then post something intelligent
vas1217 2 years ago 37
totally agree
fetthunderdome 2 years ago
Yeah! (but Nikon's SO rule, with the d3's high iso performance you could probably use the detailed pics of the inside of the lenscap as product shots ;P)
simebass 1 year ago
@vas1217 Haha seriously! That was my first thought when I saw the thumbnail.
OwnedIRLK 1 year ago
dslr ?
i thought these were toaster oven's
hmm learn somein new every day
socal1000 2 years ago
what is the point of that?????????????
JohnnyJRotten 2 years ago 2
your right i know now the d300 is better than the 50d but at that time i could'nt get over the fact of canon's specs/
o well now i know wich one is better and in a couple months you can see how much gear this gear head unboxes :)
although i am getting a d300
i still would rather have a 1d mark III
socal1000 2 years ago
canon ftw
nikon sucks i know i got a point and shoot and use my bro's d80 a few times and the quality from nikon to canon
is like mac to sony
canon is mac
nikon is sony ( pun intended )
if you dont know what that means learn a little more about nikon
canon 50d go's head to head with a d300
that cost 600 bucks more
there pro d3 vs 1d m3 nikon 600 more ???????
socal1000 2 years ago
Your a gear head not a photographer but if you do want to be a gear head a d300 blows away a 50d okay, and the nikon d3 is a lot more high tech then the canon m3 , nikon d3 has 2 card slots, fx and dx and so so, i like how you say canon is better but yet you have a point and shoot you are terrible.
Recon9143 2 years ago
What are you smoking, and can I have some? Clearly you're not a photographer if you can say with a straight face that Nikon sucks. Idiot.
nosaeRfOecioV 2 years ago 2
You can't compare Nikon and Canon DSLRs by your experience with point and shoots.
GuiMontag1 2 years ago 3
You fail.
CaesarRex 2 years ago
are you serious or just being an idiot to annoy people with common sense?
sacredgeometry 2 years ago 2
d3 nutswinggers...your buffer quits first and your camera shoots slower
cdelviscio 2 years ago
Who cares i shoot on a D2
:-D
TimsLimbs 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and do you think i care
cdelviscio 2 years ago
Comment removed
TimsLimbs 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Canon rules nikon loses:D
guiltyy 2 years ago
Hi there, can you re-do this test leveling the variables please?
Set the Nikon to the same speed as the 1Ds dissapointing maximum 5fps and make sure both cameras are running the same image size making it a fair test. Running the Canon at 5fps and jpeg is not fair compaired to running the nikon at 11fps and RAW. I'm not saying thats what you did but the Nikon is deffinately shooting a lot faster shutter speed than the canon. I'm assumeing thats the D3 and canon 1d Mk III isn't it?
TimsLimbs 2 years ago
The 1d MK III shoots at 10 fps per second...If you're talking about the 1DS MK III then that's 5fps..
Hollister1844 2 years ago 2
Ahh, many thanks. I suppose its the person behind the camera that yealds the results.
TimsLimbs 2 years ago
Yields
asianwong 2 years ago
Wow d3 is actually slower.
rustynasty143 2 years ago
remember tha nikon f5 the best camera in the world when canon eos 1v comes up f5 disappeared, d3 looks like copy of eos 1
kiparisia 2 years ago
Shumeshi can suck my cock!
youre dumb you cany afford either so go back to india or something ass****
xmansonmailx 2 years ago
Comment removed
zjd158 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why did you find it necessary to censor "hole"?
lol.
and actually, shumeshi makes a very good point. just calm down a little, eh? i mean, do you ever expect to win an argument by telling someone to suck something? you are just another one of the people who make youtube a less enjoyable experience. for once, i want to find a video without a ridiculous argument in the comments below. Let's just say this.... Canon and Nikon are the top camera manufacturers.
zjd158 2 years ago
i know ur righ i usually ignore those people....
but when it comes to canon i cant!! just let go...
especially when people dont even know the facts and dont bother to do their research.............nikon is a good camera.....but when "nikon users" bad mouth canon i have no choice but to stick up for my brand choice camera........i happen to love national geographic and some guy is like no they use nikon..i know someone who works for national geographic!!!!!!
xmansonmailx 2 years ago
Nikon does not suck, so what if it chokes on shooting fast? it still has great color imaging than canon, and more accurate than canon, because it has more focus points. i like canon, and i like nikon. be nice.
Rdel4 2 years ago
why does national geographic use canon?
because nikon sux we all know that!
the only thing nikon has is well lets face it....ashton kutcher to promote (endorse their damn product
xmansonmailx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh and one more thing u forgot. Nikon also has better cameras
mrmindstorms 2 years ago
Agreed. Although I like both and have used both, all *my* gear is Canon. Nat geo uses Canon because of the lenses...which are the main reason I have stuck with Canon and WILL stick with Canon.
dandaman247 2 years ago
and canon has.... andre agassi. FAIL
vominator 2 years ago
I don't know what you mean by National Geographic is using Canon, go to their website, see their photographers, they use both Canon and Nikon. In fact it's not even written anywhere, just sometimes they have their cameras with them in the picture. That just means only suckers like yourself need to worry about the brand. If you can't get a good photo with Nikon you can bet you ass you won't get it with Canon either.
Shumeshi 2 years ago 3
dude how can you tell :P
heardyetforsaken 2 years ago
coolchef1337: i wasnt replying at your comment.. i was replying at other comment. i didnt even read your comment... some how my comment end up at the latest post.. i dont know why.
globetrackers 2 years ago
nikon sucks shit
10034859 2 years ago
NIKON LOSES LOL
Darken3dEdge 2 years ago
when there out of date --they'll both be boat ancor's
sasktank 2 years ago
it wasn't available as an option when i shot this video - should have been included for the price if you ask me.
gregthurtle 2 years ago
I'm guessing this D3 hasn't had the buffer upgrade done?
xund3ad 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
YOU FORGOT TO TAKE OFF THE LENS COVER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! eaeuiheuaheuaehauehauehauehauehaeuhaeuheuhaeuhaeuaheuaheuaheuehauehauehaeuaheuheauheauehaueheuhaeuheuaehueuheuaheauehauehaeuheauheauehauehaueheuaheuaehueh .... sorry ... i couldn't avoid ...... and ... still a dumb test .... ;) !!!
Chucrinho 3 years ago
your a tool.
TenaciousLevi 3 years ago 3
nobody asked :D !!!!!!!
Chucrinho 3 years ago
what's the point?!
fetthunderdome 3 years ago 3
D3 shoots that fast with 1.5x crop factor while 1DMKIII just with 1.3 crop factor... hmmmm
globetrackers 3 years ago
D3 is a fullframe, moron.
coolchef1337 3 years ago
no shit, but u can select between the fx ful frame or to the dx cropped so u can still use ur existing dx lenses, with the dx option selected the d3 can actually shoot at 11 fps
kdidddddy 3 years ago
Oh, sorry... i don't care about DX crop... if it's FX, keep it FX.. only fags are buying cheap DX's and, by the way, discount lenses (Sigma, Tamron) to this awesome camera...
coolchef1337 3 years ago
not true...not everyone can afford a full frame sensor buddy.
AIDSbanana 2 years ago
I mean only fags are buying DX lenses to FX body. This is really dumb, even if you can get everywhere some cheap, but still not so expensive Nikkors... like the manual focus 20/3.5 UD, 50/1.2, 85/1.4, 180/2.8...
coolchef1337 2 years ago
oh yeah, I totally agree with you. I mean, if you have $3000 to spend on the d700 body spring for something like the 24-70 f/2.8 why don't you?! or even get a cheaper non AF-S lens, but not a DX lens...what a waste of the full frame sensor that would be.
AIDSbanana 2 years ago
actually I just realized something like the 24-85mm AF-S would be perfect for the d700. nice and sharp, with an af-s motor, and cheap too.
AIDSbanana 2 years ago
lol.. u r stupid like ur mother.
globetrackers 2 years ago
globetrackers: Really? Show me some photos from D3 with DX lens on FX mode... and think, who is stupid... actually the 35/1.8 DX only is usable, but so-so usable, it vignettes so hard...
coolchef1337 2 years ago
Nikon D3 is faster than Canon 1Ds Mark III because it's has less megapixels but 1D Mark III is still faster than D3
l33thustla 3 years ago
that made no sense buddy, think before you type.
IdiotsGon3Wild 3 years ago
You're the one than doesn't make sense idiot. You should think before you type and check the fact.
l33thustla 3 years ago
Did you read the comment you left ? "Nikon D3 is faster than Canon 1Ds Mark III because it's has less megapixels but 1D Mark III is still faster than D3"
THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE
IdiotsGon3Wild 3 years ago
What is it that doesn't make sens? That the 1Ds is slower than D3 or 1D is faster than D3?
Did you miss "s"? What is it that doesn't make sens. :S
l33thustla 3 years ago
OHHHHH 1D
sorry, my bad. xD
IdiotsGon3Wild 3 years ago
Nothing harm done :)
l33thustla 3 years ago
canon have a 21.1mp FF 1Ds MKIII and the 10.1mp 1.3x 1D MkIII since the file for the 1Ds is twice the size of the D3 it take longer to buffer. If Canon wanted the 1Ds MKIII to shoot 9fps they would have done that but whats the point the D3 has 12.1 mp so does the origional 5D and thats been out for near 5 years now. nikon needs to step it up.
fourthsquarephoto 2 years ago
You mean... step it up... even though they released the D3x like 3 or 4 months ago..?
IdiotsGon3Wild 2 years ago
Icnt undrstd, which is te faster?
veritasveritatum 3 years ago
if you have to shoot thta many frames to get a good picture then I wouldn't call me a Professional
polymexdf69 3 years ago
ahem, Sports? The point of that many pictures is so that you can get incredible sequences of the motion of a player.
guy1193 3 years ago
if it does the job that you need it to do and does it well then it is a great camera
jdc1234 3 years ago
Which one maked the most shot during this test?
niburu2012 3 years ago
the Canon 1DMK3 is the faster one
FDPictures 3 years ago
the Canon 1DMK3 shoots at 5fps?
the D3 at 11fps
maybe that's why the d3 chokes first...
niburu2012 3 years ago
NO!
The Canon 1Ds MK3 shoot 5FPS
the Canon 1D MK3 shoots 10sec in full resolution of 10MP!
FDPictures 3 years ago
yea...in DX crop dumbass
cdelviscio 3 years ago
you idiot, not the 1D Mark III, it shoots at 10 fps, it's The 1Ds Mark III,with full frame, who shoots 5 fps.
MartinHelin 3 years ago
niburu2012---the canon mk3 is 10 fps at 14bit-----the nikon d3 is 11fps only if set to low quality 12bit
sasktank 2 years ago
1ds mk3 shoots 5fps, but it has a 21mp sensor and is designed really for studio work. 1d mk3 shoots 10fps with a 10mp sensor.
Skatterbrain24 2 years ago
Nikon rules,canon sucks....
joseolague 3 years ago 4
i don't care which one you going to give me....
pavel89l 3 years ago
haha. so blunt. Sorry to disagree, but Canon does not suck. I love my Nikon and I will stick with my Nikon, but, Canon is just as good. If either one were worse than the other, the worse one would not be around.
freakedoutmatt 3 years ago 3
This is a debate of the past, the momentum is clearly in Nikon's favour and I don't see Canon reversing this trend in the 3 to 4 coming years.
Canon cameras remain excellent tools, but those looking for the best glass and body combo should definitely consider switching over to Nikon.
Cheers,
Bernard
bernardlang 3 years ago
That just isn't true. If it was true, I'm sure Nikon would be the best selling DSLR manufacturer, as opposed to Canon, no? Most pro's use Canon, so I don't see how you can argue Nikon are superior. They are neck and neck. PS I myself shoot Nikon.
0zgon 3 years ago 3
i agree, personally i prefere canon glass and canon IQ but i know that i would miss some important shots purely due to the fact that canons ergonomics disagree with me. I shoot a d300 and couldnt be happier (unless somone handed me a d700) about popularity, lets put it into perspective. i was recently at glasto festival and i cannot recolect seeing one d3 i saw literally hundreds of 1ds mk3s. alas only my friend and i sported liecas that weekend
peace
Brian
sacredgeometry 3 years ago
lol! exactly! shut them up dude! haha! canon is number 1... altho the D3 might get some more profits in for nikon but i'm sure canon knows that
pofrani 3 years ago
That's why Canon is the #1 camera retailer, and Nikon is like #5 :)
250zt1fcdpymrnk 3 years ago
While Canon has the highest sales, Nikon is close behind in second, far behind in third is either sony olympus pentax or fuji. Canon and Nikon are close, though Canon is pulling ahead.
guy1193 3 years ago
that's when she said I don't hate you boy I jsut want to save you while there's still something left to save
taekwondodrum 3 years ago
are you not the man? you shoot with Nikon so you must be the man. kidding - nah but i prefer Nikon, but i would not mind having one of those damn Canons!!!
bigkingsha 3 years ago
Honestly the only reason why Canon is the best selling manufacturer , is because, of the advertising they do. this being said, I also shoot nikon.
extremefstop 2 years ago
Canon canon canon canon... Ok, the only flaw is the FPS... 5FPS is more than enough considering the image quality that Canon delivers that, with out a doubt, beats Nikon a100 times
lustandblood 3 years ago
lustandblood---the canon mk3 is 10 fps
sasktank 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeh........I'd rather pay an extra 2 grand for the Canon.........fukin NOT!
roscovitch 3 years ago
$4K for the canon verses $4.5K for the nikon? Its cool that you want to bag on this because youre a techie dork but atleast get your facts straight nuggggaaaaaa
randyp1234567 3 years ago 3
I would be happy with the canon 1d MkII :-)
rockvideos81 3 years ago
wouldn't complain if i had either...
pilic13 3 years ago 3
The MKIII stomps the D3 here, and in most areas (including AF performance, color accuracy, etc).
Also, the buffer on the D3 is insufficent for RAW shooting, which most pros will be using. It also apparently has a hard time hitting even 9FPS.
When it comes to high ISO performance, the D3 finally catches up to what Canonites have been used to for half a decade. The difference in noise between these two cameras is VERY small.
Canon still provides the world's best pro sports camera.
j93fkc5m8qhdp4g 3 years ago 6
70% of registered photographers during the 2004 Olympic Games were EOS owners :-)
rockvideos81 3 years ago 2
only a few thousand shots there =)
dryan2 3 years ago
yum
ydrjtt 3 years ago
Casio has a digital camera which can do 60fps.. my point here is 'fps' doesn't tell the whole story. It's good to had HIGH fps, but you have to compare them apple to apple... D3 & 1DMK3, both have diff MegPixel.. if you read the spec, you will know who the KING in fps comparsion.
sp561 3 years ago
Yeah, but also it is important to take into consideration more than megapixels. It's important to consider the density of pixels on a sensor as to its ISO performance. The D3 destroys just about everything in ISO performance. And FPS. Maybe not mega-pixels, okay, definitely not megapixels, but speed-wise the D3 is king. It really depends on each photographer's needs as to which camera is best. There is no ultimate best dSLR.
TrentonRomulox 3 years ago 3
fannnnnn boyyyyyyyyy faggggotttt
randyp1234567 3 years ago
ughgh delete my comment ughghhg please.
randyp1234567 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!
theMTBgroup 3 years ago
Awesome!
Even with the UDMA cards, the D3 bumps the buffer end much more frequently than the MK3.
j93fkc5m8qhdp4g 3 years ago
video didnt really explain anything to me who won or who was faster, just taking your word for it.
dombower 3 years ago
Guys, you don't need 100 jpegs, you might not even need 64 jpegs..
The difference between 9 and 10 and 11 fps is totally irrelevant, what is the real competition between these 2 is low noise and very fine grain + intelligent sensor engineering....
sefard777 3 years ago
I can't believe I know the guy who put this video up!
What I can say though, as much as he is a devouted Canon man ... he is tempted by the D3.
To the D4 owner ... come round my place and I'll show you what the D5x is about!
solentstudios 3 years ago
it's not "shooting is a special way", it's merely using the camera as it was designed to work.
videodaddy99 3 years ago
My point is that with UDMA cards the D3 will be able to take more photos in the end. The buffer size becomes irrelevant when using the right card. Ultimately a pro photographer needs to shoot a lot more than what the buffer can hold and this is when the D3 has an advantage.
Your test is deliberately set up to make one camera look better when in a real situation it is quite the opposite.
videodaddy99 3 years ago
Specs say different. 64 JPGs (21NEF) Vs 110 JPGs (30 CR2). So if i want a fast burst at a wedding of the bouquet toss then the Canon would seem the better choice as it supports 3 seconds of shooting Vs the 2 of the Nikon.
You're saying that *if* I have a UDMA card in the D3 *and* *if* I shoot in a special way i can get more pictures.
With the settings I had on both camera's it made no difference that the D3 hit it's buffer first.
I shoot how I shoot, and that's what happens when I setup.
gregthurtle 3 years ago
For shooting a flying bouquet, you certainly don't need 9FPS also!
lexkleren 3 years ago
i have a d4.
randyp1234567 3 years ago
Pfft, I have a D4XHs.
ChrisHepburn 3 years ago
Me too.
0zgon 3 years ago
It is kind of pointless to slow the Nikon D3 down if you are not using CF cards that support UDMA. With a UDMA card the D3 can shoot write to the card about three times faster effectively extending the total amount of frames that it can store at full speed before the buffer fills.
videodaddy99 3 years ago
your point being?
D3 has a specified smaller buffer than the canon (110 Vs 64 IIRC) - this video reflects that.
gregthurtle 3 years ago
And just how many people, how many times are going to need to take 50 photos + in the space of 5 seconds? I certainly wouldn't want to be the one editing the photos of someone who uses a camera like a machine gun!
rosscotube 3 years ago
Non stop Nikon fire!
hyperlinker 3 years ago