Added: 6 years ago
From: slpk
Views: 8,389
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it distraction no show nnothing .its americans teacher .

  • Amg. Videos of games. Ril pro processing thar. Liek it doesn't need the videya card.

  • Hehe, AMD owns... their Athlon 64's opened a can of asswhooping for those Pentium 4 frying pans xD Now the roles are turned around, that's good.. it makes sure that we get to buy the good stuff for a reasonable price ^^

  • AMD Rullz

  • XP 64 SUCKS!!! IS MUCH SLOWER THAN 32!!! (PS: i'm using Athlon X2 5200+ Brisbane at 2.7 Ghz)

  • AMD Forever

  • i dont get it is intel processors like all 64 bit like the c2d or what if they arent then haha! i still tink intel ownz

  • 3. 64bit OS owns anything. I have Xp x64 and it is the BEST OS I have ever seen and i don't think there is anything else commercially available that can come close to it. Over 10,000 Microsoft programs work on x64 and there are VERY few that won't that are mass-used today, with the exception of Java.

  • And Java is falling out of everyday use...so that is something that most people could live with.

  • Vista X64 is much better than XP X64, especially for multi cores and compatibility, everybody knows that...sigh

  • Give me some benchmarks to convince me...

  • Benchmarks are needed for performance, I never talked about performance dumb noob...sigh

  • im not going to start a nig-ass flaming session over the obvious with an arrogant ass fucking dick sucker who just likes to intimidate people over issues that are not worth it. Go fuck yourself.

  • Wow, you must have some miserable life if we look at your use of words...

  • 3. 64bit OS owns anything. I have Xp x64 and it is the BEST OS I have ever seen and i don't think there is anything else commercially available that can come close to it. Over 10,000 Microsoft programs work on x64 and there are VERY few that won't that are mass-used today, with the exception of Java.

  • Shadow, use it before saying lies. There are real lots of compability issues with Windows XP 64bit, which is not the same thing as 32bit. Vista 64bit is much better on this side, with almost no compability issues, and the reason is as simple as that XP64 was designed for businesses only and Vista64 for the general public.

  • funny you say that because I'm using the XP64 and have only 1 program that doesn't run on it and it was made in 2000. I also have a 1999 program running on Xp64. I've not had any experience with 64bit Vista. yes you are right about 64bit being used for small servers and businesses and that is why I choose it, my computer could take it and it would have a net increase on my computer's speed. Xp32 and XP 64 drivers were made to be mostly generic.

  • So when most Win 98 programs had their XP patches made, 64bit compatability was already insured. This is not the same case with Vista. :D

  • Then maybe you're right, but it would be the first time I heard that XP64 didn't have compability issues, while IT techs say there are. Are you sure you're not running on Vista? Cause I know that vista doesn't have the problem of compatibility. Although you could have a server as computer, that is feasible as well.

  • Well AMD 4 core CPUs are much cheaper then intel's Quad. And the servers that support up to 4 or 8 AMD CPUs are cheaper as well. The Bus higher as well.

    BUT, saying that, Intel is ahead and about to slap AMD with their quad penryn chips. Especially the Quad mobile penryns. I can't wait to use Vmware on a laptop with that much ability.

  • nothing beats the q6600 in terms of performance for value.

  • spoken like a saint, i have the exact same CPU and i love it. That CPU is what MADE intel INTEL!!!!

  • Vista 64x supports 32bit too

  • FAN BOYS??! come on... FUCK YOU BUSINESS BOI? intel is for business and Video editing. NOT GAMING. AMD=Video,Gaming. dont call us fanboys cause we know wtf were talking about

  • Your retarded dude, get Intel and be enlightened

  • will games work better on the windows 64 bit than on the windows xp professional SP2?

  • x64 Games, yes.

    x86 Games, Same as x86 Windows, No loss though :)

  • x64 Games, Yes.

    x86 Games, Same as XP x86, But no Loss :)

  • LOL LOL LOL what a waste of money, buying windows 64 bit. yeah go ahead buy that and use all of windows 32 bit applications because there's no 64 bit windows app. (well there may be some but i've yet to see any) worthless os

  • You are one dumb bitch.

  • Message me if you have the Tom Green box set! Thanks!

  • you guys heard of core 2 duo? i heard it pwnz amd? Did you hear that?

  • amd is awsome intel sucks

  • AMD JUST PWNED INTEL. SHUT UP ABOUT IT. FUGGEDABOUT IT

  • Haha.. He blaitently states that he only sees the values of one company.. says the other company sucks.. and still thinks thats not THE DEFINITION of the word FANBOI.

    Fanboi isnt an attitude fool.

    its a mindset.

    Every option has its values.

    close your mind to the properties of a value.

    and your a fanboi.

    Hey.. if you dont get it.. Forget it.

    You never will.

  • you can always tell who the idiots of the world are.. when they think that one company is better... just becuase its 5 percent better at any givin time.. trust me buddy.. 6 months later they will be 5 percent slower..

    the best numbers they stat atm was 20 percent increase.. haha.. way to go there. thats lightyears ahead.. amd rocks. intel rocks. fanbois are idiots.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more