At one point, they even considered mounting two of these to a CH-47 Chinook. Imagine that... a helicopter with 105mm howitzers on it. Crazy stuff, huh?
Would this system have worked on the M551 Sheridan's cannon? According to this video (0:32), they system "eliminates almost 70 percent of the recoil force" found in conventional cannons.
Heh. It don't look good. 105mm should be designed with direct fire in mind in addition to traditional indirect howitzer role. They should come up with a dual recoil system like they had with the 280mm Atomic Annie, and the option of adding a armored sheath like the Russians usually have on their howitzers.
Not really effective at direct fire. You have to have a independent operator to traverse the weapon infront of the cannon, which is not good good for direct fire, as in high level situation requires quick firing, and quick adjustment for the howitzer especially for armed vehicle. The Russian D-30 is better suited for such a role other than the fact it needs to anchored to the ground during set up.
obivous but the first requirement for direct fire is minimal negative elevation that is not always possible (as mortar that can be devastating if man make a ground slope)
but ability to self defence by firing a 360° single shoot is very important for the crew morale ;
i think the anchor need a engine for being removed
@HunterGregorySr AFAIK electronic sensors and striker release system were used to compensate for different shell types and adjustable charges. The howitzer failed some military reliability tests.
Thanks, that makes sense to me. It reminds me of the an-94, a remarkable feat of engineering, but in the field it's just another overcomplicated solution to a less than serious problem.
do they sell it in pink?
Artic3buster 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One person dislike because he was one who in the video ....
hwlam 7 months ago
One person who dislike because he was one who in the video ....
hwlam 7 months ago
At one point, they even considered mounting two of these to a CH-47 Chinook. Imagine that... a helicopter with 105mm howitzers on it. Crazy stuff, huh?
Spartan043 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Would this system have worked on the M551 Sheridan's cannon? According to this video (0:32), they system "eliminates almost 70 percent of the recoil force" found in conventional cannons.
tommyzDad 10 months ago
Comment removed
tommyzDad 10 months ago
Would there be any disadvantages to tank cannons using a soft recoil system?
tommyzDad 10 months ago
I think Ronald Reagan narrated this.
DobermansRock 1 year ago
EFFFFF JUST SHOOT IT
xxEPICSHOOPDAWHOOPxx 1 year ago
Heh. It don't look good. 105mm should be designed with direct fire in mind in addition to traditional indirect howitzer role. They should come up with a dual recoil system like they had with the 280mm Atomic Annie, and the option of adding a armored sheath like the Russians usually have on their howitzers.
PontiffMystic 2 years ago
Of course making it light as possible with lighter steel like Titanium like the M777, and a low profile as possible.
PontiffMystic 2 years ago
what dont look good ? for me its the best design ever see ;
is not direct fire capable ?(dont hearn speaks)
omnianti0 2 years ago
Not really effective at direct fire. You have to have a independent operator to traverse the weapon infront of the cannon, which is not good good for direct fire, as in high level situation requires quick firing, and quick adjustment for the howitzer especially for armed vehicle. The Russian D-30 is better suited for such a role other than the fact it needs to anchored to the ground during set up.
PontiffMystic 2 years ago
obivous but the first requirement for direct fire is minimal negative elevation that is not always possible (as mortar that can be devastating if man make a ground slope)
but ability to self defence by firing a 360° single shoot is very important for the crew morale ;
i think the anchor need a engine for being removed
omnianti0 2 years ago
Was this project cancelled? I can't find any information on it.
Fowarderboy 2 years ago 2
Yes, it was...
jaglavaksoldier 2 years ago
Thats a shame, I wonder what for... weight perhaps?
HunterGregorySr 2 years ago
@HunterGregorySr AFAIK electronic sensors and striker release system were used to compensate for different shell types and adjustable charges. The howitzer failed some military reliability tests.
Sonderkraftfahrzeug2 2 years ago
Thanks, that makes sense to me. It reminds me of the an-94, a remarkable feat of engineering, but in the field it's just another overcomplicated solution to a less than serious problem.
HunterGregorySr 2 years ago