Genetic proof of the Theory of Evolution

[TehxAcious]

wait i have a question, if we came from monkeys then were did the Monkeys come from???

[FlyingBlindfolded]

Ken Miller needs to remove this video himself.

He has been proven to be in error and anyone who supports this old theory is mocking Mr. Miller.

Mr. Miller doesn't believe his old theory anymore.

Science progresses and we shouldn't mock the failed science of the past.

It's best if we just move on or scientists would never propose new ideas.

Ken failed this time but he is only human.

[kokalol7]

a scientist has found a gene that makes guys fuck ppl in the butt, will the ppl who is being fucked in the butt evolve their butts into va jay jays?

[kokalol7]

if i fuck someone's momma in the butt for a million years will her butt turn into a vagina that's what i want to know.

[Therooker0]

@FlyingBlindfolded The fossil record supports the record of fossil; not creationism. There's no geological, circumstantial evidence for a once worldwide flood.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@Therooker0 Please look into this yourself Therooker.

The fossil record tells another story.

We don't see fossils being made today yet billions of them were created in the past.

To create a fossil you need to quickly bury them which a world wide flood would do.

Your eyes are closed to the obvious truth.

[winterstellar]

Yes, for one there's the proof for our common ancestor with the chimp and the bonobo. We almost didn't need it since we share almost 100 percent DNA with them(slightly exaggerated, but not that much exaggerated, hehe) WE are apes, furless apes, that's one change those differing genes has lead to, the much less fur we have. Many other changes too of course and that is because a DNA molecule has very many genes, so even if just one percent differ,the number of genes that differ is still large. : )

[streetlightpoetry]

parrot for vocal chords? just don't see monkeys breeding with parrots often

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Wrong they know what a\causes fossilization.

And they all date in order. You made a clame not backed my chemistry but opinion.

You sick of geting owned?

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus sediba, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus robustus , Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, Homo floresiensis

[FlyingBlindfolded]

This video has to be embarrassing for Ken Miller since the chimp genome project uncovered that this Chromosome fusion couldn't have happened.

We got a closer look at Chromosome 2A and 2B and discovered that the so called fused human Chromosome #2 has 150,000 sequences not in chimp 2A or 2B.

Since fusion won't add information, where did it come from?

I don't know, no one does but the fusion theory is back to being a theory with no evidence to support it.

[geonaturaleza]

What Separates Us from Chimps? As It Turns Out, Not Much

watch?v=AzDLkPFjev4&feature=ch­annel_video_title

[geonaturaleza]

Richard Dawkins: Why are there still Chimpanzees?

watch?v=wh0F4FBLJRE&feature=ch­annel_video_title

[FlyingBlindfolded]

1:27 in and he says the theory is testable.

Great!

Let's fuse one of a chimps gene pairs and make a human.

LOL

How old is this video?

Do it's maker(s) know that the Yale University study that proved that man and chimp share 98% of their DNA was just exposed as a fraud!? LOL

Evolution is so much fun :-)

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

You are lieing I am calling you out.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 I'm out and ready to fight!

What's the problem?

What are you questioning me on?

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Your source on thaat dna bull?

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 What DNA bull?



[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

"Do it's maker(s) know that the Yale University study that proved that man and chimp share 98% of their DNA was just exposed as a fraud!?"

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 Not really sure what you are talking about.

Do you mean: are the scientists that did the study aware that their study is a fraud?

I would assume so.

They were discredited by their peers a few months later.

It wasn't until 2011 that we had the empirical proof that we are very very different from chimps.

We hadn't done the chimp genome project prior to that.

All claims prior are moot and full of it.

Science supports creation every time.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Wrong but nice try

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

We still have all of the fossles and they claimed it was a small percentage difference .

They also reworked information only allowing information that suited there side but not all of the facts.

This video also fits with the known fossles all of wich I have seen pictures and looked over close up profile pics for all of them. We also share matching endogenous retroviruses with grate apes and a recessive tail genes.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 "We still have all of the fossles and they claimed it was a small percentage difference ."

What?

"They also reworked information only allowing information that suited there side but not all of the facts."

Who?

"This video also fits with the known fossles all of wich I have seen pictures and looked over close up profile pics for all of them"

This video sites the fusion of 2A and 2B chimp chromosome to produce C2 in humans that was proven imposable this year.

Thanks.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

No lab work that meant we have an opinion not facts you lose.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Combied gentic facts with FOSSILES.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 Like the genetic fact that information (DNA) can't write itself?

That fact?

How about that DNA needs DNA for DNA to exist.

How about the fact that RNA produces a protein that is only found in RNA.

So how did the RNA get there?

What about that fact?

At least I show you the facts.

You just throw bits of info out with nothing to back it.

For example, what fossils are you talking about?

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

In fact the only place I found your bull was Creationist sites LOL!

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 The established atheistic scientific community would never contradict themselves.

That would mean the existence of God and to them there is no thought more abhorrent than that.

So they created their own religion with a god called "Father Time".

Father Time made the earth.

Father Time made life.

Their nuts.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

More opinion I win.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

More opinion I win.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

You can see evolution in a lab. Exam the evidence test it and repeat your work.

You can't deny the fossil record with out lieing or genetic evidence with out discarding facts that contradict your belief system.

What you just did was an opinion based counter but refused to show your fork for the creation myth.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 "You can see evolution in a lab."

Do you really believe that?

Show us what you mean?

Realize that in order for us to have "evolved" from simple lifeforms to complex life forms, new information needs to get created.

So evolution has to be able to create information or we would never get past the first blob.

Now tell us about the lab where we can see "evolution".

Thanks.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Nylon eating bacteria.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985

A damaged Gene is not evolution.

No new information was written.

Information was lost in this case.

If the bacteria keeps on loosing information like this it would eventually "evolve" itself out of existence. LOL

What the scientists actually accomplished was genetic manipulation.

One other thing.

The inventor of nylon used proteins as the example for the molecule.

Nylon is close to what protein eating bacteria eat.

Evolutionists like to make the gap wide but it isn't.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Your source this is not what I seen.

You still ignore the fossles and what we see in the genetic record.

You lied about your information on genetics the only thing about it I found whereon creationist websites.

And you admitted it was based on opinion not what they see in a lab.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 WIKI Chimp Genome Project.

You mean to tell me you couldn't find that?!?

Please don't write me again.

Thank you.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Talk origins website has 100% peer review material is has refuted countless creationist claims you are full of shit.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 I give you direct evidence and you give me nothing.

If you won't believe science then how can I help you.

Science just this year has proven without any doubt that we do not have a fused chromosome from chimps and we are very very different from chimps.

The complete data isn't even in as the chimp genome project is on going.

How you can ignore science is the stuff of religion.

Keep your religion to yourself.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Combine th FOSSILS with the gentic evedence we have testble proof of macro evolutin that you can see you are covering your ears and going back to opinion based counters from creationist websites.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 Once again you give us nothing.

DNA proves design.

DNA is information and information does not write itself.

A single cell has enough information to fill a 3 Gig hard drive.

All that information has to work together or the organism dies.

The point where all the information just happens to come together in a "soup" is imposable.

The faith required to believe that is beyond religious and enters into insanity.

DNA is proof of a creator.

DNA needs DNA to make itself.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus sediba, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus robustus , Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, Homo floresiensis

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 "Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops," etc. etc.

Which one would you like to talk about?

Which one do you think tells the evolution story best?

Thanks

[Therooker0]

@FlyingBlindfolded The notion that all humans descended from two historical persons is impossible. Genetic studies show that current humans descended from a group of at least 10,000 individuals, and to account for the observed human genetic variation, mean that it would've taking an impossibly high mutation rate, if all humans descended from two individuals as creationists suppose.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Macro evolution is observable testable fact

Human chromosome 2

Matching retroviruses between apes and humans. resdual limbs a tale bone at base of the spine. recessive genes.

Progressive patterns in comparative genes

Junk DNA

Single strain DNA.+multiple dating methods that agree with each other with less than a 1% margin of error proving the earth is old enough for the time needed for macro change.

Ring species.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@TheMrgoku1985 "Macro evolution is observable testable fact". No it isn't. "Human chromosome 2". It's a chromosome. "Matching retroviruses between apes and humans." It's an interesting virus, what's your point? "resdual limbs" None exist. "a tale bone at base of the spine". It's a bone, not a tail bone. Too small "Junk DNA" What ever DNA you don't think you need, just remove it and see how that turns out LOL. Are you actually going to say anything about these or just bore us?

[lapmarty]

@FlyingBlindfolded your understanding of evolution is really primitive, it is a bit like a child asking questioni, you know, when they first ask mommy where do baby come from? or mommy does people in china walk head upside down?

please, dont make a fool of yourself,

replicating cell were a big step in the formation of more complex organism,

but your -The point where all the information just happens to come together in a "soup" is imposable. it didnt, go read some more,this is pathetic

[TheMrgoku1985]

@FlyingBlindfolded

Let me guess Answers in genesis website?

[tonhogg1]

yet where is the species that would have to be between ape and man.  They fail to explain this. So did an ape just pop out a human baby. I make that a joke but really there are some very large holes in this theory. It is just a theory remember. Many of these in between species should have survived today.

[geonaturaleza]

@tonhogg1 they never said that man came from ape but that we share a common ancestor and our chromosome no 2 proves that.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@geonaturaleza chromosome #2 has been found out with the chimp genome progect that fusion is impossible.

See ya.

[geonaturaleza]

@FlyingBlindfolded watch the collapse of intelligent design watch?v=Ohd5uqzlwsU&feature=ch­annel_video_title,

after that if you still believe in a designer you are not a serious person

[FlyingBlindfolded]

@geonaturaleza Ok, for you I will watch it because I like and respect you so much.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

Can you help me find the video you want me to watch?

I get a Justin Bieber video and Severe Teenage Acne when I search for it.

Sorry.

[FlyingBlindfolded]

Can you help me find the video you want me to watch?

I get a Justin Bieber video and Severe Teenage Acne when I search for it.

Sorry.

[geonaturaleza]

@FlyingBlindfolded fusion of genes impossible? Read an article about cancer 'First Recurrent Gene Fusion Identified in Ovarian Cancer'' an article in internet. Nobody designed us, we are not robots we are the product of evolution

[geonaturaleza]

@tonhogg1

Richard Dawkins: Why are there still Chimpanzees?

watch?v=wh0F4FBLJRE

[geonaturaleza]

Another argument against creationism

watch?v=TKgUeuO8xJc

from Galapagos

[davrothelegend]

The one dislike was froma chimp

[Judicial78]

Amazing. I wonder what creationist explanations for this would be. I guess Jesus took some Ape DNA and used "Gluon" to fuse them together to make his special little animals the humans LOL