Loading a cannon by pouring gunpowder down the barrel! From the bung in the side of the barrel! All that would do was blow the loader up as the powder was set off by the residue of the previous shot.
Never mind the history (crap) what idiot was technical advisor on this film!
@Tareltonlives Almost EVERYTHING said in the movie "Shaka Zulu" about the English is pure baloney. The show starts off with "Lieutenant" Flynn getting orders to find Shaka. Flynn (only a MIdshipman) was a trader, and went to Zululand seeking a fortune. No more, no less. He had no authority except his own.
It shows King Cetswayo insulted at Windsor Castle and told he couldn't have his kingdom back, when the OPPOSITE is true.
@Tareltonlives, the History of the series is off for sure, the military tactics & scenes even worse in this case. But, this the only major miniseries to actually thell the story from yhe African Zulu side for a difference. So, take the usual historical errors and tactical flaws in stride, they make the series even more fun, you know.
@youse12132 Shaka fought Zwide twice, at Gqokli Hill and at Mhlatuze River. The British played NO PART WHATSOEVER in either battle. Shaka never saw firearms used in battle, in fact. This is just a movie, and just about everything this film says about the British is just baloney. Farewell and Fynn weren't on an official mission, for example, they were just adventurers seeking their fortunes.
@a0e0roberts on the contrary the british did help him in wars .he wasnt that impressed by the firepower .because he saw they had to reload after every shot fired that gave the enemy an advantage they could move in and as soon as they got close enough shaka said the gun men would be mangled ..ive read it
@fashizze I said that the British played no part in the Battle of at Gqokli Hill and at Mhlatuze River. SPECIFICALLY. Perhaps the books I've read are out-of-date. Maybe new information has become available. I'd love this, btw. Most of what we know is based on the self-serving and contradictory writings of three English traders. What books have you read?
@a0e0roberts my info comes from several bios ive read on sites about the man. you said he never saw fiearms .so that means your saying the british never fought in any zulu campaigns
@fashizze I said (and you can look for yourself) "Shaka never saw firearms used in battle, in fact." He saw them when the traders came to visit him. The ONLY time firearms were used in battle during the time of Shaka was against the Kumalo, and the result was widespread panic on both sides ("The Zulu Kings," Biran Roberts, p.115-7). Shaka was NOT there at the time; he would probably had his lieutenants executed.
Some of those muskets look like pea shooters. And the Europeans uniforms are crap. What they need are a bunch of Martini-Henry's and some red uniforms and some pith helmets.
The Europeans had on Zulu uniforms along with European clothing. And the Martini-Henry rifle didn't come into service until the later part of the 19th century, 1871.
HAHAHA You see what a small group of Europeans can do to thousands of Zulu's. The Zulu's got raped at Rorke's Drift. 4000 thousands Zulu's against 100 British soldiers, and a bunch of the soldiers were sick.
That´s not a proof of bravery. Is only a matter of having better weapons.
Would have been interesting sending the british against those zulus with no guns nor armor, only a spear and a shield, 1 to 1, so we could speak about superiority or bravery. But that´s impossible right?
But, if you want to speak about technology and development that´s another matter.
@miguelitoven Actually it is bravery because those were a lot of motherfuckers. I don't care how many guns your have your can't kill a whole army with only 9 ppl. If Shaka didn't send his troops they would have surely died from the rush or the lack of ammo. If it wasn't bravery then they wouldn't have been scared before.
@LordWellington15 if shaka wanted to he could have killed those guys. and the zulus defeated the british once with shaka so what are you talking about stupid.
like everyone else shaka thought the white man was there to help and all they wanted to do was take over. never never trust a white man. that dude looked crazy when shaka said that b.s. about the christ in is heart will defeat anyone crap lol
It wasn't the white man, it was emperial European conquest. The white expedition went in with there racist preconceived notions that they could scare the zulus with their rifles and technology. Then they got to know the zulus and wanted to form an alliance but the British government refused. Do to colonial arrogance, thousands of Brits died to achieve what Zulus would have given them. Land and goods in trade for technology and education.
Zulus needed land to grow food and raise cattle. They certainly did not want overlords.
Shaka wanted something from the Whites - to know his potential enemies, to understand their powers and to give his own people a foil and potential enemy to keep himself in power.
Shaka had a wonderful sense of strategy, terrain and timing. What a pity that the Brits were too stupid/racist to make him a General or Viceroy.
@gene15644a They weren't stupid. Shaka would have tried to rise to power u can't keep a king, a warrior king at that as a second string. They want to lead everything not just a portion.
@RiftRaft123 Perhaps... The British were able to co-opt Rulers in other nations. Perhaps Shaka could have been persuaded to be a vassal of the British Crown? We will never know, but part of me wishes that the Zulus could have been part of the Empire rather than a conquered nation within the Empire. He was a worthy opponent of the Empire, including members of my own family who died in the conquest of Southern Africa.
@gene15644a I know but even though he unified south Africa and spread the culture, his home rule was brutal. He should have worked on his home rule better. Shaka kept the enemy at bay but when his half brother assasinated him it is believed that his last words were that the white man will take the land. It would be better if they were a peaceful empire but it was an empire lead by a conquerer.
Shaka is like the African version of Gengis Khan.
@gene15644a Its like if Carthage would have beat Rome in the Punic wars. They were very close but it didn't happen. If they dead then they would be the sole super power and much of history would have been different.
I don't believe for one moment that Shaka believed that the white man was there to help him. He was a man who took what he wanted in life, and probably understood that people don't come long distances to "help" others. Especially since there was already a a colony on the Cape of Good Hope.
Shaka believed that he was all powerful. Dutch settlers were no match for Shaka's large armies, so he probably initially thought that the British were no threat and would easily serve him. Once he saw that the gun was superior to the spear, he tried to form an alliance to avoid being colonized. Shaka had land to burn so giving the Brits land was a small investment in perserving Zulu hegemeny. He later saw that his efforts would do nothing so Zulus thereafter pressed up against the Brits.
Shaka didn't believe such a thing. He repeatedly put the whites in a position that exposed there lies because he never believed them. He was smarter but not as well armed.
Did you watch the movie? Shaka did his fair share of conquest and "taking over" to make it out to be a "white trait" is ludicrious. It just so happens that the white man was more powerful.
I believe Shaka could've driven the British out of Natal to the sea. He had tens of thousands of warriors. Sure, he'd have to convince his men not to fear the British "magic" weapons. Not impossible. The Zulu shamans would've concocted special juju herbal potions that would give the warriors a psychological boost. And once the regiments of Zulu warriors closed in on the British it would be hand to hand combat, bayonet to spear.
"Our bullets run out. And those bloody spears don't." Zulu Dawn.
"I believe Shaka could've driven the British out of Natal to the sea" Shaka could have killed all of the British. Single handedly. In the real world, there weren't more than a dozen of them, and they were the most unlikely bunch of adventurers possible. They were always trying to back-stab each other (figuratively speaking), each one trying to be the great white chief of Natal. The only reason they survived is because they brought new trade goods with them. They were no threat. 10 years later...
Certainly... the man had 80, 000 well trained warriors @ his disposal. The Zulu warriors did not fear da "magic" weapons of da whites because Shaka had indoctrinated dem 2 da point where like the Aztecs da Zulu's felt dat death on da battlefield was da best type of death. If dey were ordered 2 attack the Whites there would not have been the slightest hesitation by any warrior, as Piet Retief's party found out in 1838.
"Why didnt they blow the crap out of the zulu??" Huh? They were trying to form an alliance with the Zulu.
Shaka was fighting Zwide and the Ndwandwe people. Is that what you mean? I don't think they had much powder or shot. Everything they had was pulled off a sinking boat.
Anyway, this is all fiction. Shaka beat Zwide without help from the British.
I don't recall anyone making these comments on the post for 300. Greece is but a shadow of itself. Anytime Africa is shown in a light, other than shanty towns, we need to pick away at the greatness.
The africans are still doing what they were doing at those times which is killing each other.At those times they were killing each others with spears , now they kill each other with the guns that the white men sells to them.
Even in the villages in africa people are doing witchcraft on each other in order to exterminate each other.
i cant help but to chuckle some at the part when the whites start falling back because of to many warriors advancing and its funny in a way lol first the old man gets stabbed in the side and screams "yeeeaaa'lol and the the other yells while swinging his rifle "get back u savages get back get back yeeaaaaaaaaaa" lol has me chucklin every time that part comes up lol hahahahhaha funny
from bibical days ppl have been killing certain of their own to saperate who's wut! Whie ppl killed Jesus so you kno they dont care as long as they r on top when the smoke clears. I love that movie to death.
"I don't believe it was safe for a missionary to dare enter the Zulu territory at that time." They did. As Cetshwayo said "First come the traiders, then the missionaries, then the red soldiers."
The old 300 Spartans trick, forcing superior numbers of enemies to attack into a narrow front. A well trained & armed small force can stop or defeat a larger one that way.
he was testing their faith in their god so he wanted them to prove that with christ in there hearts they were unstoppable thats the problem with people of faith they hesitate when put to the test or get scared and renigg
The man was a power hungry bloodthristy killer.. killing thousands of his own people over the death of his mother and also having his son killed how can anyone rationalize the actions of this man Shaka
@allahndong Um in whos education is napleon a superstar he was a military genius but he led his men to death in russia and also was a butcher in spain. Maybe in France they think of him as a superstar.
@fashizze And what did the western world do to Africa? With a man like Shaka to unite them they had a chance. Those were different times, it was kill or be killed.
@bcibibcibcpCB even after his death the zulus were still a powerful empire .and used his war tactics and still lost to the europeans in the anglo zulu wars..as for your excuse for what he did to thousands of his own people .thats rationalization definition =creating false but belivable excuses to justify inapropriate behavior
@fashizze In the proces of maturity our society had to go trough thoser fase. The Romens, Napoleon, The Kelts,... The spreaded their language, their culture and knowlidge. Without them we would all speak different languages and the world would exist out several tribes. There were men needed to unite people. Europe, America, the whole western world is a product of men like Shaka.
@mistermateriel alexander was a conquerer extending his empire .the only way to do that was by war .in wars people die..this man shaka was a genocidal mad man .he killed thousands of his own subjects through murder and starvation .the cold blooded bastard had women and their babies killed at his meetings if their babies cried ..and if someone sneezed they were quickly put to death. the man was a cold blooded maniac
Shakka was one of the true kings. He posessed mre than just heart, he the understanding and was on his way to becoming truely enlightned. His power was real and evident which is why so many were wiling to ride and die with him. He earned everything including his crown and the title king of kings. Had he not been murdered, through the power of thought he would have eventually transcended his human form and became dietised and rose into the sky to dwell with other true, non fictional kings.
You are either stupid or crazy for sayin some stupid shit like that about a man who was a crazed mass murderer who slaughtered thousands of his own people and even stupider for sayin if he would have not been killed he would have asended into the sky you are a nut or just plain dumb.. don't post stupid crazy ignorant shit like that it makes u look pathetic
well put fashizze,well put.its kind of a sad tale,you can see what shaped the man that he was.but still no excuse for what he did,its like praising hitler or something!??!that other dudes nutts,i think his brain assended in the heavens.
855muppet your a white man and you have the nerve to judge anyone on murder.Your ancestors have killed millions under God the american indisns were over 50million before the white man came to america now the are reduced to reservations.Your pathetic
I Love this Battle scene spacially when they used the Cannon lol
mitsubishidiamante 4 days ago
first time i hear about shaka
JaSamZaljubljen 2 weeks ago
Loading a cannon by pouring gunpowder down the barrel! From the bung in the side of the barrel! All that would do was blow the loader up as the powder was set off by the residue of the previous shot.
Never mind the history (crap) what idiot was technical advisor on this film!
freebeerfordworkers 1 year ago
It`s amazing how the ridiculous and ignorant quotes from that work of fiction, ie, the bible are brought to nought when exposed to the real World.
serberious 1 year ago
What the hell are English guys doing here? By the time they met Shaka Zwide was dead and Shaka had been king for a long time.
Tareltonlives 1 year ago
@Tareltonlives Almost EVERYTHING said in the movie "Shaka Zulu" about the English is pure baloney. The show starts off with "Lieutenant" Flynn getting orders to find Shaka. Flynn (only a MIdshipman) was a trader, and went to Zululand seeking a fortune. No more, no less. He had no authority except his own.
It shows King Cetswayo insulted at Windsor Castle and told he couldn't have his kingdom back, when the OPPOSITE is true.
ImperialistRunningDo 1 year ago
@Tareltonlives, the History of the series is off for sure, the military tactics & scenes even worse in this case. But, this the only major miniseries to actually thell the story from yhe African Zulu side for a difference. So, take the usual historical errors and tactical flaws in stride, they make the series even more fun, you know.
Wolfen443 9 months ago
Wait which battle was this?
youse12132 1 year ago
@youse12132 Shaka fought Zwide twice, at Gqokli Hill and at Mhlatuze River. The British played NO PART WHATSOEVER in either battle. Shaka never saw firearms used in battle, in fact. This is just a movie, and just about everything this film says about the British is just baloney. Farewell and Fynn weren't on an official mission, for example, they were just adventurers seeking their fortunes.
a0e0roberts 1 year ago
@a0e0roberts on the contrary the british did help him in wars .he wasnt that impressed by the firepower .because he saw they had to reload after every shot fired that gave the enemy an advantage they could move in and as soon as they got close enough shaka said the gun men would be mangled ..ive read it
fashizze 1 year ago
@fashizze I said that the British played no part in the Battle of at Gqokli Hill and at Mhlatuze River. SPECIFICALLY. Perhaps the books I've read are out-of-date. Maybe new information has become available. I'd love this, btw. Most of what we know is based on the self-serving and contradictory writings of three English traders. What books have you read?
a0e0roberts 1 year ago
@a0e0roberts my info comes from several bios ive read on sites about the man. you said he never saw fiearms .so that means your saying the british never fought in any zulu campaigns
fashizze 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fashizze I said (and you can look for yourself) "Shaka never saw firearms used in battle, in fact." He saw them when the traders came to visit him. The ONLY time firearms were used in battle during the time of Shaka was against the Kumalo, and the result was widespread panic on both sides ("The Zulu Kings," Biran Roberts, p.115-7). Shaka was NOT there at the time; he would probably had his lieutenants executed.
a0e0roberts 1 year ago
it is a powerful warning from history... just hope that someone will learn from it... yeah! well.. not much chance of that then!
TheStevewhelan 1 year ago
When I first saw this movie way back in the 80's it gave me nightmares. Now as an adult I can enjoy it. Henry Cele was perfectly cast as Shaka.
hollywoodwerewolf 1 year ago
Shaka was an extremely brave, brilliant, psychotic leader and mass murderer.
ReinhardtvonMeinhard 1 year ago
If your Christ wants to be the lord of the Zulu's he must deserve it...
Guluva69 1 year ago 2
@Guluva69, love that line.
Wolfen443 1 year ago
Some of those muskets look like pea shooters. And the Europeans uniforms are crap. What they need are a bunch of Martini-Henry's and some red uniforms and some pith helmets.
LordWellington15 2 years ago
The Europeans had on Zulu uniforms along with European clothing. And the Martini-Henry rifle didn't come into service until the later part of the 19th century, 1871.
TheBaltimoreKnight 2 years ago
HAHAHA You see what a small group of Europeans can do to thousands of Zulu's. The Zulu's got raped at Rorke's Drift. 4000 thousands Zulu's against 100 British soldiers, and a bunch of the soldiers were sick.
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!!!
LordWellington15 2 years ago
That´s not a proof of bravery. Is only a matter of having better weapons.
Would have been interesting sending the british against those zulus with no guns nor armor, only a spear and a shield, 1 to 1, so we could speak about superiority or bravery. But that´s impossible right?
But, if you want to speak about technology and development that´s another matter.
PD: I´m not black
miguelitoven 2 years ago
@miguelitoven Actually it is bravery because those were a lot of motherfuckers. I don't care how many guns your have your can't kill a whole army with only 9 ppl. If Shaka didn't send his troops they would have surely died from the rush or the lack of ammo. If it wasn't bravery then they wouldn't have been scared before.
RiftRaft123 1 year ago
@LordWellington15 if shaka wanted to he could have killed those guys. and the zulus defeated the british once with shaka so what are you talking about stupid.
Remedave1 1 year ago
@Remedave1 Yes but you see he didn't, therefore I declare him stupid.
LordWellington15 1 year ago
he had to believe they were of help. he actually thought they had the power to make him look younger.
BSteady14 2 years ago
There was not many (Half Caste) (Mixed Race) people in those days ..Obama never existed our people didnt come about ontil like 100 years later
rottwieler20 2 years ago
like everyone else shaka thought the white man was there to help and all they wanted to do was take over. never never trust a white man. that dude looked crazy when shaka said that b.s. about the christ in is heart will defeat anyone crap lol
BSteady14 2 years ago
It wasn't the white man, it was emperial European conquest. The white expedition went in with there racist preconceived notions that they could scare the zulus with their rifles and technology. Then they got to know the zulus and wanted to form an alliance but the British government refused. Do to colonial arrogance, thousands of Brits died to achieve what Zulus would have given them. Land and goods in trade for technology and education.
TheBaltimoreKnight 2 years ago
Zulus needed land to grow food and raise cattle. They certainly did not want overlords.
Shaka wanted something from the Whites - to know his potential enemies, to understand their powers and to give his own people a foil and potential enemy to keep himself in power.
Shaka had a wonderful sense of strategy, terrain and timing. What a pity that the Brits were too stupid/racist to make him a General or Viceroy.
gene15644a 2 years ago
@gene15644a They weren't stupid. Shaka would have tried to rise to power u can't keep a king, a warrior king at that as a second string. They want to lead everything not just a portion.
RiftRaft123 1 year ago
@RiftRaft123 Perhaps... The British were able to co-opt Rulers in other nations. Perhaps Shaka could have been persuaded to be a vassal of the British Crown? We will never know, but part of me wishes that the Zulus could have been part of the Empire rather than a conquered nation within the Empire. He was a worthy opponent of the Empire, including members of my own family who died in the conquest of Southern Africa.
gene15644a 1 year ago
@gene15644a I know but even though he unified south Africa and spread the culture, his home rule was brutal. He should have worked on his home rule better. Shaka kept the enemy at bay but when his half brother assasinated him it is believed that his last words were that the white man will take the land. It would be better if they were a peaceful empire but it was an empire lead by a conquerer.
Shaka is like the African version of Gengis Khan.
RiftRaft123 1 year ago
@gene15644a Its like if Carthage would have beat Rome in the Punic wars. They were very close but it didn't happen. If they dead then they would be the sole super power and much of history would have been different.
RiftRaft123 1 year ago
aaw, cmo'n, trust us. you know you want too!
jaishua 2 years ago
I don't believe for one moment that Shaka believed that the white man was there to help him. He was a man who took what he wanted in life, and probably understood that people don't come long distances to "help" others. Especially since there was already a a colony on the Cape of Good Hope.
gene15644a 2 years ago
Shaka believed that he was all powerful. Dutch settlers were no match for Shaka's large armies, so he probably initially thought that the British were no threat and would easily serve him. Once he saw that the gun was superior to the spear, he tried to form an alliance to avoid being colonized. Shaka had land to burn so giving the Brits land was a small investment in perserving Zulu hegemeny. He later saw that his efforts would do nothing so Zulus thereafter pressed up against the Brits.
TheBaltimoreKnight 2 years ago
Shaka didn't believe such a thing. He repeatedly put the whites in a position that exposed there lies because he never believed them. He was smarter but not as well armed.
Badjohn007 2 years ago 2
@BSteady14
Did you watch the movie? Shaka did his fair share of conquest and "taking over" to make it out to be a "white trait" is ludicrious. It just so happens that the white man was more powerful.
LambadLambadLambda 2 years ago
best true story movie ever it goes right into the hart of africa the root of it all
rottwieler20 2 years ago 2
Shaka was a military genius..
mkwapower 2 years ago 10
thats very stupid you need real fire arms like machine guns and then
stauf09 2 years ago
Give it fire
NobleTravelsEast7 2 years ago 16
It all comes down to blowing their heads off.
alextubeta19 3 years ago
man, you should on a board of directors, your role would be to give one liner presentations at the end of the meetings :D
kubikmaster 3 years ago
If Lieutenant Farewell were Alive today, he would make a superb trial lawyer. He twists everything that is said with such skill and ease.
alextubeta19 3 years ago
So true but id still wager the brisitsh if we had proper commanders.
Colour Sergeant Bourne: Because we're here, lad. Nobody else. Just us. ZULU
Sorrellz 3 years ago
I believe Shaka could've driven the British out of Natal to the sea. He had tens of thousands of warriors. Sure, he'd have to convince his men not to fear the British "magic" weapons. Not impossible. The Zulu shamans would've concocted special juju herbal potions that would give the warriors a psychological boost. And once the regiments of Zulu warriors closed in on the British it would be hand to hand combat, bayonet to spear.
"Our bullets run out. And those bloody spears don't." Zulu Dawn.
hollywoodwerewolf 3 years ago 2
"I believe Shaka could've driven the British out of Natal to the sea" Shaka could have killed all of the British. Single handedly. In the real world, there weren't more than a dozen of them, and they were the most unlikely bunch of adventurers possible. They were always trying to back-stab each other (figuratively speaking), each one trying to be the great white chief of Natal. The only reason they survived is because they brought new trade goods with them. They were no threat. 10 years later...
a0e0roberts 3 years ago
to defeat them you to attack from sea air and water.i bet them spears wouldn't worth shit.
stauf09 2 years ago
Certainly... the man had 80, 000 well trained warriors @ his disposal. The Zulu warriors did not fear da "magic" weapons of da whites because Shaka had indoctrinated dem 2 da point where like the Aztecs da Zulu's felt dat death on da battlefield was da best type of death. If dey were ordered 2 attack the Whites there would not have been the slightest hesitation by any warrior, as Piet Retief's party found out in 1838.
Eldosmuchacho 2 years ago 2
Zulu, true warrior.
okiedokies 3 years ago 2
Without a doubt.
hollywoodwerewolf 3 years ago
Shaka treated the missionaries assigned to his country with ambivalence, first receiving them warmly and then turning on them.
challengeauthority 3 years ago
"We will see who is the true King Of Kings... who is Power. If your Christ wants to be the Lord of the Zulus he must deserve it ... as I have".
One of my fav miniseries
deSantos25 3 years ago 4
they have a cannon. Why didnt they blow the crap out of the zulu??
LordWellington15 3 years ago
"Why didnt they blow the crap out of the zulu??" Huh? They were trying to form an alliance with the Zulu.
Shaka was fighting Zwide and the Ndwandwe people. Is that what you mean? I don't think they had much powder or shot. Everything they had was pulled off a sinking boat.
Anyway, this is all fiction. Shaka beat Zwide without help from the British.
a0e0roberts 3 years ago 2
coz they were hosted by the Zulu, otherwise they would not have escaped alive...same goes for Hernan Cortez conquering Mexico
kubikmaster 3 years ago 2
AEY MAN! POST THE REST OF THE FLICK!
Firelogger 3 years ago
Cool movie. Shaka was a hard c*nt.
evltoy 3 years ago
I don't recall anyone making these comments on the post for 300. Greece is but a shadow of itself. Anytime Africa is shown in a light, other than shanty towns, we need to pick away at the greatness.
Suckerman12 3 years ago
what do you meen by Greece is but a shadow of itself.
uiopytrre 3 years ago
What's the name of the mowie whom is taken this clip?
Fritzkarraldo 3 years ago
shaka is dat nicca he kuld talk someone into killin theyself
ttymejr 3 years ago
The africans are still doing what they were doing at those times which is killing each other.At those times they were killing each others with spears , now they kill each other with the guns that the white men sells to them.
Even in the villages in africa people are doing witchcraft on each other in order to exterminate each other.
And the whole africa is sinking
thkalas 3 years ago
So have whites, and thats why america is sinking. Thanks to capitalism, and its imperialistic nature.
zerohero35 3 years ago
shaka zulu ne croyai pa en jesus kel con hhihihihi
rogodrogba 3 years ago
Shaka is the Greatest Thanks for uploading this can u upload more of this especially the battle before he becomes king
Sekhemresementawy 3 years ago
Thanks for post man :D!
Memories 'sigh' :(
BobOehOe 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
man cavemen could beat these fools
they aint no spartans
not even romans
spears and cowhide shields
RP1117 3 years ago
u are stupid and u need to shut the hell up and watch the clip spartans my ass these men were scared of shaka if you were watching
remedave 3 years ago 2
The movie 300 is highly exagerated, just because the warriors are not white doesn't mean they dont know what they are doing.
And the 300 sparts owe alot to their navy if anything. Otherwise they would have got owned a long time ago by the persians.
zerohero35 3 years ago
ZeroHero: Sparta didn't HAVE a navy. Athens did, but was usually opposed to Sparta. The Athenean navy crushed the Persians at Salamis.
The Persians had already burned the city of Athens, but the Atheneans got their revenge.
a0e0roberts 3 years ago
i agree
uiopytrre 3 years ago
i cant help but to chuckle some at the part when the whites start falling back because of to many warriors advancing and its funny in a way lol first the old man gets stabbed in the side and screams "yeeeaaa'lol and the the other yells while swinging his rifle "get back u savages get back get back yeeaaaaaaaaaa" lol has me chucklin every time that part comes up lol hahahahhaha funny
fashizze 3 years ago 4
"their magic is working!"GREATEST MOVIE OF ALL TIME!!
cdoggs1 3 years ago 2
I SAID ATTACK!!!!
saanzacs 4 years ago
One of the movie's best parts!!! Thanks for posting!!!
saanzacs 4 years ago
from bibical days ppl have been killing certain of their own to saperate who's wut! Whie ppl killed Jesus so you kno they dont care as long as they r on top when the smoke clears. I love that movie to death.
sfboss16 4 years ago
all of the africans knew of jesus that was nothing new to them
swazia73 4 years ago
yea but Shaka didn't. I don't believe it was safe for a missionary to dare enter the Zulu territory at that time.
ImAntiConformity 3 years ago
"I don't believe it was safe for a missionary to dare enter the Zulu territory at that time." They did. As Cetshwayo said "First come the traiders, then the missionaries, then the red soldiers."
a0e0roberts 3 years ago
neway the point is Shaka had never heard of Jesus,
ImAntiConformity 3 years ago
The old 300 Spartans trick, forcing superior numbers of enemies to attack into a narrow front. A well trained & armed small force can stop or defeat a larger one that way.
LC65 4 years ago 3
"do you not have christ in your heart"?
kromeuno 4 years ago 2
he was testing their faith in their god so he wanted them to prove that with christ in there hearts they were unstoppable thats the problem with people of faith they hesitate when put to the test or get scared and renigg
fashizze 4 years ago
The man was a power hungry bloodthristy killer.. killing thousands of his own people over the death of his mother and also having his son killed how can anyone rationalize the actions of this man Shaka
fashizze 4 years ago
just like napoleon who is a superstar in the education we receive whereas he performed real crimes against humanity
allahndong 4 years ago
@allahndong
" he [Napoléon 1er] performed real crimes against humanity "
Oh yeah ? Which ones ? When ?
Briselance 1 year ago
@allahndong Um in whos education is napleon a superstar he was a military genius but he led his men to death in russia and also was a butcher in spain. Maybe in France they think of him as a superstar.
Lumotaku 1 year ago
@fashizze And what did the western world do to Africa? With a man like Shaka to unite them they had a chance. Those were different times, it was kill or be killed.
bcibibcibcpCB 1 year ago
@bcibibcibcpCB even after his death the zulus were still a powerful empire .and used his war tactics and still lost to the europeans in the anglo zulu wars..as for your excuse for what he did to thousands of his own people .thats rationalization definition =creating false but belivable excuses to justify inapropriate behavior
fashizze 1 year ago
@fashizze In the proces of maturity our society had to go trough thoser fase. The Romens, Napoleon, The Kelts,... The spreaded their language, their culture and knowlidge. Without them we would all speak different languages and the world would exist out several tribes. There were men needed to unite people. Europe, America, the whole western world is a product of men like Shaka.
bcibibcibcpCB 1 year ago
@fashizze
And Alexander The Creep wasn't?
mistermateriel 1 year ago
@mistermateriel alexander was a conquerer extending his empire .the only way to do that was by war .in wars people die..this man shaka was a genocidal mad man .he killed thousands of his own subjects through murder and starvation .the cold blooded bastard had women and their babies killed at his meetings if their babies cried ..and if someone sneezed they were quickly put to death. the man was a cold blooded maniac
fashizze 1 year ago
Sort of like the English.
GAZANUTYUN 1 year ago
@fashizze ever heard of context and ''spirit of time and culture''??
FOKKERization 1 year ago
@FOKKERization he was a meglomanic savage bloodthirty murdering tyrant
fashizze 1 year ago
WOULD JESUS- fire a gun?
CoCoColey 4 years ago 2
CoCo-- Yeshuwa wouldn't have to......
nozybtch1 3 years ago
Oh shit!! Shaka is the man, tryin' to kill those white
guyz like that. Do you not have Christ in your heart??
Fuck he got them there!!!!
olecs 4 years ago
How long did the white men stay in south Africa to learn zulu language. You see the problem with Africans they are just too friendly.
Zarasha1 4 years ago
Shakka was one of the true kings. He posessed mre than just heart, he the understanding and was on his way to becoming truely enlightned. His power was real and evident which is why so many were wiling to ride and die with him. He earned everything including his crown and the title king of kings. Had he not been murdered, through the power of thought he would have eventually transcended his human form and became dietised and rose into the sky to dwell with other true, non fictional kings.
fullerparkboxing 4 years ago
You are either stupid or crazy for sayin some stupid shit like that about a man who was a crazed mass murderer who slaughtered thousands of his own people and even stupider for sayin if he would have not been killed he would have asended into the sky you are a nut or just plain dumb.. don't post stupid crazy ignorant shit like that it makes u look pathetic
fashizze 4 years ago
well put fashizze,well put.its kind of a sad tale,you can see what shaped the man that he was.but still no excuse for what he did,its like praising hitler or something!??!that other dudes nutts,i think his brain assended in the heavens.
cdoggs1 3 years ago
probably did ..what a wacko
fashizze 3 years ago
And yet famous white kings and queens, and warriors did this and you see that without a problem?
zerohero35 3 years ago
All religion is bullshit. It is just a way to unite large groups of people under one banner and control them.
fullerparkboxing 4 years ago 3
Jesus is the only king of alllllllllllllll kings
jayblac 4 years ago
shaka is a murderer he killed over 10,000 of his own people
855muppet855 4 years ago
855muppet your a white man and you have the nerve to judge anyone on murder.Your ancestors have killed millions under God the american indisns were over 50million before the white man came to america now the are reduced to reservations.Your pathetic
producerbigsouth 4 years ago 3
PLease just give me one gattling gun (chain gun). The one like in Predator. You could win the war in a minute!
Domzdream 4 years ago
Actually the gattling gun was what allowed the British to eventually win the Zulu wars, so you are right there.
jkibler1112 4 years ago
shaka said by the time it took them to reload they would be manggled
remedave 3 years ago
Shaka rocks!!! King of the Kings!
sonofburma 4 years ago
jesus christ thats a massive army shaka has got id say he has bout 40,000 warriors i dont no but its deffently more then 7000
s1l3ntsh00t3r 4 years ago
BLAM!
gone!
Domzdream 4 years ago
shaka is the best.
remedave 4 years ago
not even his feathers were left--blown away!
graz45654 4 years ago
wela wendovu
pagola 4 years ago
its weNa wendLovu
stbrant 4 years ago
wow thanks for the correction teach me moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
pagola 4 years ago
hai wena its Wena Wendlovu....not that
mzimbipt 4 years ago
teahc me zulu and i shall teach you my language
pagola 4 years ago